'Richard Martin's Wake Up Call'

Very occasionally I get the chance to recommend something - another site or news service or as in this case, an esteemed analyst who has a podcast service.

http://www.richardmartinswakeupcall.podbean.com/

The thing about pooled analysis of the kind that goes on in what are effectively social media control rooms belonging to GCHQ or the GRU or even the FSB, is that all those who end up with decent Intel-driven conclusion reports, started with a group of people around a large table, all of whom can easily have quite individualistic perspectives.

The point being, of course, that they all also have an adequately advanced mindset fully-equipped with good intellectual tools at their disposal.

It's 'old school' but it's not really old school...

I can say without hesitation the podcast I am recommending here comes with all those credentials, having been able to demonstrate them over decades in one form or another. 

Factually speaking, and I would say that it is a fact - today, none of the big agencies I mentioned above are only 'head-quartered' and centralized; they have distributed nodes of analysis experts 'out in the field' be it in the corporate city blocks of major financial centers, or inside research facilities of many different kinds - IE., Fabrica in Italy, other European design centers and especially also, in general academia. Almost all major masthead newspapers have editors who regularly sit on (government) Intel Committee panels.

And these basic government institutions now have a lot of 'competition' from big organized internet communications companies, to say nothing of how the Chinese government operates in the on-line and digital data collecting space.

Japan always had 'JETRO' and this was well-recognized as a benign and even a useful universal corporate intelligence dissemination agency - but of course, they definitely had internal analysis and policy directorates driving a Japanese government policy stance on things. And that's very fair enough, I would say. 

My school...

'Independent,' I would say - if you mean highest level, educated, independent analysis - probably fits neatly into the simple nomenclature of stock standard ethical old school, um, Alphabet stuff... ...that is, absent of sophisticated and surreptitious infiltration by political and/or particular moneyed interests, then your stock standard Harvard or Cornell or MIT and especially Brookings along with their panoply of orbital relationships - ISO and Amacom publishing - academic team-people, is what we would serve with the same set of defined characteristics and also report to at some point, that is, to the same democratically-elected policy leaders. Albeit, for all scrutiny that could be shone, independently.

Hey! Who's that? Now that's 'old school!'

I don't have a problem with that. I would tell the explicit and complete truth to the CIA if they ever asked (not that they will) and I probably would as well to quite a number of others not restricted only to US-led Western government authorities; unless I was told to shut up which I have been from time to time (LOL). And I would recommend the same stance to others to take; these guys are not nearly as bad as pop media and conspiracy thinkers make out. 

Boris Johnson is going to have a lot of trouble pulling the UK government and bureaucracy octopus into line though... I don't have much time for those guys unless I see enough evidence that the right people are back in charge there. The Five Eyes has been a big mistake. But... ...well, not my call there. We'll see what happens. 

We are heard in the courts of kings and princes, so let's
all be respectful about what we do and say and the way we do things around here, not that any of us
ever have been anything other than that... 

You see, how many of you know that the infamous Alexander Downer, was on on the board of Huawei...?

See what I mean?

What Does 'Deep' in 'Deep State,' Mean

"THUNDERBALL!" Ghislaine Hoch took that pic above...

Now as I write this, there are not too many people in the world, who know or are able to say, where the much-wanted Joseph Mifsud, is.

Right now Joseph Mifsud is in the Kimpton Fitzroy Hotel in London, England. How long he will remain there I cannot say, because I do not know.

What I do know, is that very unfortunately there are connections between Harvey Weinstein, Joseph Mifsud, Jeffrey Epstein, Stefan Halper, 'possibly' Prince Andrew, the Clinton Foundation and so on of that vast spectacle of an 'elite' crowd.

Kimpton Fitzroy - a chintz-y, re-worked, fake 'olden days'
facade of a place... Kinda nice inside, but very fake.

And what I do also know, is that there has been some speculation by a few of the team members in some pretty highest level 'analysis' circles - that the person you are seeing who is called 'Ghislaine Maxwell' is not the person who was Robert Maxwell's daughter; Maxwell, as you know, having disappeared from the deck of his boat the 'Lady Ghislaine,' at around some time after maybe 4.45 a.m., on the 5th of November 1991, off the Canary Islands.

Now, what you may not know, is that, regardless of the information about Jeffrey Epstein owning an island, or several islands - there are in addition other places out at sea, where this particular group goes, can go, does go, is...

These are undersea structures - I kid you not - as well as floating sort-of 'ships' of a kind.

Maxwell's real name is 'Hoch.' And he was born in the Ukraine and all of the narratives about him claim that he is a Jewish person. Which would make him, it would seem, a Ukrainian Jew...

And I'm not going to tell you what that means, or certainly might mean.

What I am going to show you, is the place where Prince Andrew entertained that young gal who is currently in the news on account she is a witness against Epstein in his case.

'The Tramp' private club, in London

And I'm also going to tell you that the Ziff brothers, the inheritors of the US publishing group developed and owned largely by William Ziff Jr until his death in 2006 - were on Harvey Weinstein's board of directors. Until they resigned when the negative stories broke into the wider media. And the Ziff's donated heavily to the Clintons. And, blah blah blah what a sad tragic damn mess.

And so, we cannot go much further than that at the moment and we don't really need to and in all events it's all very sordid and frankly, boring.

Yep, that's Ghislaine, getting out of a sub

Of course we don't like what happened - must have happened - to little kids. And perhaps the law will take its course there.

Robert Mueller was intrinsically involved in the * of a lot of money from the Ukraine. I say '*' but there are all these other phrases that are also used like 'pur*'d according to my purview.' Okay I made that up. 

It's not really an 'lol' thing, is it.

All those of you who are already in touch with us here privately, that is, by private contact via email and so on, are already getting some additional 'inside stuff' that is probably quite valuable. And we need to be most quiet about it all too.

The world has never been in a more dangerous, and frankly vile, place, when it comes to the big leagues of the money business. No one else needs to know, what you will come to learn and to know. And to have.

Our very own 'Russian friend' is leaving for Moscow in the next two/three weeks, and they have the brief to acquire some Russian er, er, some Northern Snow Marten glandular secretions, and some Siberian Musk... And maybe a sable hat or two.

Sable hats are very useful when you are out in the cold. And they're even useful when you come in from the cold, and get to say to the idiot across the table: '...Meanwhile, I have the sable hat, and you (still) don't.' And I hope you're all whip-smart enough to know the ins and outs of the movie scene from which that saying is taken.

Here... Here is a pick of a guy I once knew, not long ago passed away, who was a fishing buddy of the great Lee Marvin. That guy (not Marvin) taught me all I know about Martinis. His name was 'Martin,' as it happens. And he was a Fisher.

That's Martin, there, Bill, on the right next to Lee.
Obviously it was taken when they were both 'young enough.'
And by the way, thanks for EVERYTHING Bill re the little 'episode'
recently. You know how grateful we all are.

Why The Future - Because Nostalgia

What are we working towards?

What is the vision we hold in our minds, that we are endeavoring to construct some material components of, in order to realize that vision in the physical now?

Am I nostalgic? Yes. Of course. I experienced the high life in an elevated as-yet-still Colonial and then yet again, privateer, corporate social milieu - and that was many decades ago.

I think this works as design - it's modern, slightly futuristic,
but it's also authentic as a reflection of what it's supposed to be.
And I do think it is 'luxury.'

Those parts of it that I have an affection for, were very good parts indeed. The only things I saw that were negative - for the most part - were the unbreakable (and insane, as far as I was concerned) intent that quite a lot of people had, to engage in political and financial corruption in order to 'get ahead;' but not just 'ahead' as in what the modern middle class does or attempts to do, but 'ahead in the upper echelons...' They wanted to have the titles, the social position, the reverence that a handful of others appeared to command. And I most certainly saw the poverty of the outre. 

There was ugliness - as there still is. But there was the simply glorious, too.

Today, for me, the thing which stands out the most about the 'glory,' is its authenticity. If you have a lot of money today, and you are from the recent decades, you may not even know, what authenticity is... You see you can't substitute a synthetic simulacrum for something that carries a name, and a description of what it is - or is meant to be - and a manifesto of what function it performs, simply because the modern volume demand means there is not enough of the real thing to go around: you can't use a substitute, and pay the price of the genuine article, and think you are experiencing the thing.

'White musk' - is fake, you see. It isn't 'musk' at all. It's a synthetic chemical molecule made in an industrial laboratory.

And why is that a bad thing? Well it isn't a bad thing - it's just not the thing; and also it can't do the same thing, that the original genuine article can.

The characteristics of life style, of living, in the world, is changing, and will continue to change, and at some point widely deliver an experience of human life, of human society, of modern life style to many people that is a direct reflection of technology and advancement.

And there will be plenty of people with lots of money who will only assume they are living the high life, and they will not be - but you might be (living a very high life)...

One simple case example is to do with modern fragrances, aftershaves, perfumes (and by extension flavorings in alcohol and wines and other food and beverages). You see, yes, the modern chemistry lab can render amazing molecules that mimic sensations and feelings and memories about places and things. But no, they are not the things themselves. And they are not because modern industrial chemistry has a long way to go to comprehend the mechanisms of sensation, and memory especially emotional memory, and the electromagnetic dynamic mechanisms of molecular communication systems. The revered perfume expert Luca Turin (worked for the US Military under a research grant at some point...) has the best grasp of what these mechanisms are, and he is just about the only individual whose work reaches the public; others are under wraps by big industry and the military.

'By the fireplace'

You'll be paying BIG money for a European brand name men's fragrance product - such as for instance something from Maison Margiela's 'Replica' line. I cannot even say that a large component of that price is going to marketing, because I don't think it is. Maison Margiela is a brand which produces fashion for women, some fashion for men, and only has the fragrance line 'on the side' even though it is regarded as a really important modern perfume and fragrance brand. But it's not their main thing.

So, you can have a bottle that literally does smell like 'by the fireplace,' or 'at the jazz club,' or 'at the barbers.' And very clever it is, what they do; no doubt about it at all.

And you will encounter many reviewers talk about these products the same way traditionally people did about complex perfumes and French Fashion/Designer House fragrances.

But they are not the same kinds of thing; these new things are molecular constructions that are simulations of something else. And so the experience you will have when wearing them, or using them, is different by great gulfs of sensation, when compared to the real thing.

But what is this 'real thing' you are speaking about, John?

And we'll talk about that side of it in more detail in the next article. 

Rusbridger And The Money Trail

As one of our readers pointed out via a linked article he posted in his comment (see 'Wreck Stuff' blog article here) - there is such a thing as 'over-fit' where people drawing conclusions from theories that could be seen as 'conspiracy theories,' needlessly include 'hot button' things extraneous to what is required to make the actual theory fit into the observed picture.

Over-fit can be misleading. And the fact of being misled at all could take you away from the critical, even the sometimes dangerous aspects.

I mean why do we talk about any of these kinds of political things at all, really? You know - why at all, anyway?

Well, it is because they have a crucial part to play in understanding what money is doing at any given geopolitical 'time.'

Can the price of gold rise? Can and will the price of silver rise? Can BitCoin rise more? What is the future of digital currencies? What about inflation or deflation? ...And so on.

Alan Rusbridger - the chief managing editor of The Guardian at the time Edward Snowden was leaving the West with his information, and Chelsea Manning handing over troves of material to Julian Assange - is a very sophisticated (and important) example of the strategic analysis dangers of 'over-fit' to any 'theory.'

Alan Rusbridger - when he was chief editor
at The Guardian

Rusbridger basically 'let Assange down.' He 'backed him in,' as far as to get Assange to work through The Guardian as the privileged mainstream conduit, and then dumped him when Rusbridger (along with some other big name media corporations) chose to bend to the conditions and controls of the US Intel agencies' panoply concerning the most significant Manning-origin data trove.

Now Rusbridger is one of the most intelligent people in the whole world today; no question. But he is conflicted by his elevated position, and his previous 'good relations' with the US Intel people and government. He has wealth and he has lifestyle and he has position. Everyone can have an ego and even if Alan Rusbridger would like to keep his own ego 'on balance' just how do you turn on your previous 'friends' let's call them, and say to everyone, well, those guys are criminals and cold-blooded murderers who acted with no legitimacy in certain cases...?

That kind of stand takes moral backbone which can see the peril of the likely consequences, and still stand up straight.

This is not 'conspiracy' - not any kind of dark conspiracy, which is needed to explain things: this is stock standard ordinary daily lifestyle impact decisions with a moral dimension.

Rusbridger would lose money, power, friends, reputation among the elite - in short, everything he was enjoying - for being a journalist who acted 'without fear or favor.'

Typical engineer's or consulting manager's conveyance...

In Australia, there are opaque rules called 'Journalist Information Warrants' which are roughly-speaking, similar to the US FISA Court warrants; except that these also empowered Federal Police to intimidate reporters, journalists, basically anyone who has any sensitive material that is regarded as 'to be kept secret' by government (and of course, which could or might damage the reputation and/or power of the government at that given time).

'The money trail' just leads to people who are in love with money. For me, because they are illegitimately using government mechanisms of power to suppress knowledge going to the public (at basic minimum) - it's not their money; it's yours.

Now... We can get money ourselves too, you know. If we knew what game others were playing at and that we needed to start 'playing against' them. Even though others are continuously seeking to have it all for themselves all the time.
  
Yeah... Why do I get the feeling things are about to change in ways the 'elite' and the mindless drones who have been propping them up all these decades, do not have the wit to perceive is coming down the pipeline?

URGENT KIM PHILBY

interq.ward1@gmail.com

Social Chain?

In one of this week's local newspapers, was an article about a large marketing company now with a 'digital space' division called 'Social Chain.'

I think I've mentioned this company before... briefly somewhere. And probably just tucked inside some other matters.

'Social Chain' maintains a network of online users, including so-called 'influencers,' with the object being that economic value is created by having hundreds or thousands of online people positively review something - creating the impression to innocent online readers or viewers that something, some product for instance, is very well liked and that there is a strong demand for it.

To me this seems more like fraud than 'marketing...' LOL

However, what is certainly true is that decent numbers give 'currency' to an online activity.

Here at this Blog our numbers have a good upward long term trend line in the data chart of visitors and readers and users.

If it hits a certain threshold now it will be able to generate commercial revenue here for doing nothing else than what it always 'merely' has. 

And so if you ever have the capacity to bring a few more readers and contributors into here, we managers here will be grateful and we'll all of us old-time readers of 'Old Money Savoir Faire' share the proceeds - I'll set up a utility token for us and thrust it into the 'BitCoin' space by making the token an 'AltCoin' exchangeable for ordinary currency and BitCoin and direct ALL of the Blog ad and other Blog-related revenue into the utility token.

...And then each of you could perhaps also earn yourself a paid fee for writing and contributing something to the Blog.

Best Wishes

John E. N. Ward
Blog Chief Editor and Site Senior Manager

Sinister And Occult And Deeply Dangerous

I've had to think very carefully about this article... I've had to think a lot about choosing words carefully.

Firstly because I certainly do not believe making sweeping generalizations are appropriate to expressing my own thoughts on the matter. Of course, I could, like anyone casually expressing a gut reaction or 'feeling' or superficial impression - make sweeping generalizations!

This is a 'two pipe problem,'
this one!

But I'm not going to.

But then I'm also a bit stuck too, because we are positioned in a world in which 'standard definitions' for words, and common beliefs about what some old writings say - are not the same as my own understandings concerning them. So I don't know, and I'm not sure whether readers here really share similar understandings.

For example... Every church in the whole entire world is convinced there is a word 'fornication' in the Bible, Old and New Testaments. I mean, yes, there is in most translations into English, however after all the thing was not originally composed in English and Hebrew was not a written language at the proposed or presumed time of Moses and indeed there were no modern grammatical forms of written Hebrew even at the time the original Septuagint was actually written down.

So... So... Where does that leave me...

Well... The original Greek word, and the proto-god-only-knows-what - Sumerian? Sanskrit? - or the primitive Aramaic word... ...is 'ekporneuo.' 'Ekporneuo' does not mean 'fornication' - in fact so much so were early translators aware that it does not, that they notated their simplistic truncated (though final textual) translations with the phrase: 'give themselves over to fornication...' So what we have is the translators really saying this tautology - 'fornication (being the word we settled on) means 'give oneself over to er, er... ...fornication.'

A meaningless exposition, frankly.

No. It does not mean 'fornication.'

Thus, according to me and pretty much no one else, even if there were 'Watchers' or 'Fallen Angels,' who 'fell' (there were not any of those things; not in the original texts, not in reality, not at any time in history ancient, deep past, or now, or ever) their problem was not that they 'committed fornication.' Their 'sin' (and again, there is no word 'sin' originally, and certainly not as is commonly understood today as a word cast about in every church).

If you want to see someone go into a supernatural trance,
have a look at Kristian Nairn's 'trance DJ set' on YouTube.
Nairn is the actor who plays 'Hodor' in GOT, and he's also a
very good DJ.  

No. They 'exceeded all satisfactions of greed and lust even to the point past barbaric vandalism (of course, 'vandalism' not a word at that time).' Ekporneuo. And that has a 'subtle' (not!) meaning beyond simple unlicensed sex.

There is no passage in the Bible in which Sodom and Gomorrah were obliterated because of gay sex or homosexuality. No indeed, for once again, it is for 'ekporneuo' - and in fact worse; they were about to violently rape certain unusual-looking strangers under the protection of Lot.

There are many words used by Jesus Christ which have all been translated as a bulk job lot as 'sin,' but they have very very complex and subtle nuances of meaning with very important implications: the words are 'be defeated,' 'not be ideal,' 'not perfectly beautiful,' 'sinister with cunning,' 'not in the divinely perfect way...'

But no single word 'sin.' Nowhere. Not ever. Ever. Period.

So which 'Jesus' are any of you listening to? The guy that fell down in the last shower of rain at a local church on your television? Or the guy who may have lived, might have lived, and according to some did not even live, albeit at least we can all agree - the actual chronologically original 'Jesus Christ?!' ...of the texts from more or less around that time in question?

So what then is the problem, if any, with transgender anything, or perhaps, with the present political agenda that I have termed it deep and dark and occult and utterly dangerous?

Well, I can tell you my own thoughts let's say, as pitched to maybe an actual transgender person - what does going too far mean to your mind, to your sensitivities about other human beings, about your friends and neighbors...? For all I know you might be some alien hybrid, or just plain alien (ET) who is legitimately needful of gender re-assignment surgical intervention. I don't know. And I don't care, since for one thing I am neither a medical doctor, nor a surgeon, nor any kind of professional psychologist; those guys form part of the fabric of ordinary society - I do not - and that's all of you guys' business, not mine. If they have some factual basis of reason to do something well, that's that as far as I'm concerned, and if they do not - then they go too far pretending to a knowledge and powers they do not have.

So here's another thing you will not read or hear anywhere else... I'm sure you have heard it said that somewhere in the Bible, someone said that 'the Seat of Satan is in Pergamon (Turkey).'

You've heard me say this before - the gods love puns and plays on words.

Okay so the people referred to in the infamous passages in the Book of Enoch and also in the mainstream canonical Bible were never called 'Watchers;' maybe they did do 'watching' but they were not specifically named 'Watchers.' They were described as, and named 'Gegenes.' You see there's 'homogenes,' and there's 'heterogenes,' and there's 'gegenes.'

A big tall individual - well over six foot tall.
I think by name 'Gena...?'

And the Gegenes were so terribly excessive in their strength, and in lusts and in their lack of compassion (mostly, not all of them) that they were able to do whatever they wanted, and they were eventually cannibals, and highly destructive of animals and men and even forests and trees (so the story goes). And when they died out (don't worry for what reason) some occultists were able to invoke their deceased spirits and have them in-dwell living people bred to accommodate their power (nephesh-philim: 'Nephilim') and so they were great warriors, great athletes, great 'beings' and did all kinds of extravagant things.

If you mess around using certain highly toxic drugs (and of course the US Military research units are already a long way up this road), you can fiddle with the Sella Turcica (Turkish Seat) which ensconces and usually circumscribes how much endocrine activity and flow can come from the pituitary, and you can 'create' gigantism or acromegaly and those subjects will start to have extended ranges of vision ('see' things which do not appear there to the rest of us), off-the-scale rage and anger potential, and immense strength and stamina and the ability to withstand pain.

There are plenty of 'gentle giants' around and there always have been. And there are even these 'gegenes' who will do you no harm.

Those are not the guys we are worried about. The guys I'm worried about are the 'poniria' - the ones who are sinisterly cunning. And the ones that are incredibly organised. 

'Wreck Stuff'

It was a few articles back when I posted something about the Theresa May clique being willing to wreck things before they get turfed out.

A lot of people are hurting their heads worrying about 'who leaked' those emails from Sir Kim Darroch.

LOL 

Boris Johnson is not a Freemason...

Boy are they intent on smashing things up before they go. The emails themselves were just plain rude. On what basis was any of it even remotely true? The telling thing is there is nothing in the actual body of any of the emails which contains any facts on which those blunt judgments are based.

In fact, on the contrary, as Donald Trump himself points out, 'the economy is the best it's ever been, the job numbers are great and the military is far and away the best in the world...'

'Inept?' How? How does that get to be a fair call on the face of any facts? No, it's a deliberate and calculated effort to irritate the White House, and then damage the UK's Foreign Office for Boris Johnson to have to take over a poisoned chalice.

And then you have a handful of large corporations saying they are going to sack thousands of employees in the UK. And in a couple of cases, actually sacking a few hundred already.

Brexit = Doom, Trump = Bad, Prince Andrew and his buddy Jeffrey Epstein = ?

Yeah. Right. 

Reading the news - or making the news?

But... Hey... How is this all even happening? Boris Johnson is not, a Freemason. How is he winning? How are the 'elite' in such a damn mess and losing everywhere? 

Maybe there are good Freemasons, and bad Freemasons... More LOL. 

What I am willing to bet though, is that the more they lose now, the more willing they will be to turn even more nasty and damage more stuff on the way out.

I have these conversations with some very worked up people these days, and mainly, would you believe, the arguments are about this new 'trans agenda' stuff. You cannot read or watch a BBC report or page now without having to wade through endless guff about LGBTQ matters. 

Most people don't know that 'Midnight In The Garden Of Good And Evil' was a
true story written in the fictional narrative style - with a publisher statement in the
book saying it was a true story. ...And the thing they really don't know, is that it is an occult story.

...Now I 'could' tell you a story about a case I *** ******** er, 'heard about' oh, forty years(?) ago now, to do with a very senior police detective becoming involved with someone he didn't at that time know was transgendered. From what I gather, people were doing part of a vast team's project work of 'background research' to check whether what was going on had any political or other exploitation purpose. And I'm not going to tell you because the thing would still fall under a secrecy agreement, and those involved would not like me speaking about what they told me. Which they prolly shouldn't have.

However if any of you think this subject is a new one, to government, to the education system, to psychology -, you're wrong. It's very very old.

And so yeah, why is it featuring in so much of the media now? Trust me it's not innocent. And it's nothing really to do with the rights and welfare of the rare cases of these individuals - although that's what the same old susceptible people will be worked up into thinking.

In the next article, I'm going to take you all on a ride into the occult - into the deepest, most sinister, and most dangerous part of occultism that any of you will ever in your lives encounter; and you will have never previously encountered this.

Before Eyes Wide Shut, There Was...

...There was the hard Right Winger (lol) Clint Eastwood's 'Midnight In The Garden Of Good And Evil.'

And well before today's 'LGBTQ+'s' hysteria - there was Grace Jones in a Bond movie, and the quirky Anne Carlisle in Slava Tsukerman's Liquid Sky.

And long long before any of those there was Virginia Woolf's Orlando.

This was about to be Wikileaks' high security archive physical vault
location in Sweden - I have knowledge on what they really had 'locked away...'
It's basically several government Intelligences' data banks of every corrupted official
and VIP around the world, and how and where and when they were bought.

I mean do we really need to go into all of those other examples as well - Marlene Dietrich, or Joel Grey in Cabaret? 

A reader here just raised the interesting question as to whether Stanley Kubrick was giving out some kind of warning with his much-mulled-over 'Eyes Wide Shut.' 

So there are high society secret sex parties. So? So they are secret and people try to keep their identities secret and revealing them could be deadly for the person who reveals those identities. Even - so? Corrupt deals are done via such secret circles. Okay so somehow anyone cares now, do they? That is, apparently then, these secret cabals are not so extended into every facet of officialdom that maybe, maybe, some cops and courts 'might' act against some of the corruption, if it were to be found out. 

Really?

I don't believe that.

No. That's not what I believe. If you're 'in' you can and you will get away with anything and everything... ...so long as it has been sanctioned by the highest 'lords.'

'The Lady Chablis' - out front of the cast of 'Midnight In The Garden Of...'

No need for warnings there. The secret elites are still in power and in absolute control of all worldly affairs. They are at the top and they will suppress and oppress any eccentric officer and/or underling who has the temerity to try and go against them.

It might be that Kubrick was just enshrining a statement of fact in his body of work.

It might surprise some that for many years there have been learned reviewers who always assumed Ian Fleming's 'Le Chiffre' was based on the London occultist Aleister Crowley, whom he knew or knew of through the UK Intelligence Services that they both worked for during WWII.

Less talked about though, is the possibility that the 'Specter' organization was based on HP Lovecraft's dark and sinister occult 'underground' network that he proposed existed, whose members all worshiped some kind of sea monster a bit like a primordial, and supernatural 'octopus' entity. What they did was surreptitiously enter into some thriving organization and kill it from within, taking it over for their own maleficent ends. The members of this occult network had frog-like eyes, and strange mouths, and were hardly human at all. They wrecked everything they touched.

The Heralds Of Pain

Because of a view I have that recently there were some people monitoring these pages who possessed some malicious intent - I am disinclined to clearly spell out things of a relevant current events nature.

And that's a shame for those innocent parties.

Not to worry. I am able to chew gum and walk at the same time.

The balloon seller in 'The Third Man' -
kind of!

...So what we'll do is describe a few things not related to specific immediate matters directly. But these 'revelations' will nonetheless give you a new insight into how to apply important tools to your perception of what you are seeing in the press, as well as how to penetrate into the real meanings of ancient narratives, ancient texts.

There is evil in the world and that evil consists of a specific mindset that is both arrogant, and adamant of its own 'correctness' about whatever it is a-judging. But you see, people want things and there is nothing wrong with that, but the way in which they set about to attain those 'things' very very often is highly conditional: for example, some people want, I mean literally intend right from the outset, to cheat you, that is, to cheat others, even their partners, and 'get the absolute upper hand' in a transaction, in any 'deal' so to speak. They don't 'want' something, as much as they want it in a certain way.

And never, not one single time, do they ever see that their intentions are clearly seen from the start.

And so they get defeated. That is, sometimes they do get defeated by people far far far superior to their own intellect; and these people need not have 'defeated' them but that they forced it upon themselves by more or less challenging the superior party.

It's like the poker games where there are a bunch of big-headed big-mouths, laughing and scoffing and intent on pushing the thrill of scam movies about cheating and swindling and say something like 'Oceans 11' by one example and so on - and then some kid at the table they totally wrote off totally takes them to the cleaners. Right in front of James Packer's lawyer... I mean what an insulting type of behavior.

What happened?! They say in shock afterwards. What happened was they were fools. And fools and their money, are quickly parted.

As we - all of us - live in today's world right now, and witness geo-politics and the things that are presently going on on the world's stage, we will see the weakening of 'elite' powers. Naturally, when rats are cornered, and they see themselves 'going down,' they get desperate and bite and kick and scratch and all of that.

Keep your eyes open for the same 'signs...'

So what though? They're finished. Exhausted. Losing; and 'lost.' You just have to be smart and stay out of physical range of their 'last rites' of raging insanity and slowly they will actually die away, die off, die out. Finished. 

Now, when you look at even some of the most enlightened popular movies, for instance, what you are looking at is often-times unexplained and certainly misunderstood by the broader public.

I am going to give the example of the 'red mask' scene in EWS. Everyone thinks this character, this 'figure' and 'identity,' is some kind of powerful 'kingpin.'

He is not. His attire is one of the herald, and that is all. A herald has no power. He is a functionary. This occult image is one concerning the herald's circle. In authentic hidden events, this is a moment in which some announcement is being made privately to a restricted circle of people. In all ancient texts, the outward appearance of some 'character' is highly significant to the 'story' or at least, to the point of the story. What someone is being made to 'look like' or to appear like, is incredibly important and is almost always a coded message about what a thing really is, to those who have been given the keys to unlock those parables.

Those who have power are never seen for what they are and their uniforms are seldom understood. Now this is the precise bit about which I am prevented from writing right now, openly, and publicly. But if you really want to know, you can always email me privately. 

Algerian Billionaires

What I'm hoping to do over the next few weeks and months, is irritate a few people who are peering into these pages sufficiently to have them just plain make themselves quite sick reading here!

Take a go-o-o-o-d look deeply at this picture, you shadowy person who is not welcome here...

So let's begin, shall we...

If you read the bulk of the press easily available today, and watch media facades such as the BBC, you're getting such a limited presentation of the actual events and incidents really happening in the world today, that you're being very seriously misled indeed.

Take for instance the detaining of the supertanker the 'Grace I' by the UK Navy off Gibraltar. According to the mainstream news stories this ship was potentially on its way to a Syrian refinery. The disallowed part of that whole thing being that Iran is embargoed, not Syria, albeit there are 2011 sanctions by the EU against Syria, not specifically to do with oil but transport generally. Syria is not functionally a proven participant at this stage - which makes the stopping of the supertanker curious up to a point.

Any 'Syrian' refinery is actually Russian technology, literally under armed guard and supervision of the Russian government - there is no such thing as 'Syrian' refining technology. There might be (well, certainly there is) Syrian located plant and facilities that produce refined petroleum from raw crude, but there is no such thing as crude oil refining technology and carbon cracking columns provided by Syrians.

Syria is able to buy raw crude but maybe not at the price (EG 'free?') that Iran would like to take to some external refinery. On the one hand for sure Iran is already transporting some crude to Russia via its Northern borders, land and sea (Caspian).

Some learned, well-read people will understand
the phrase 'to show someone your shin...'

Probably the most idiotic part of the story handed out to the world by the BBC and others, is that there is some need on the part of Iran to ship raw crude via sea to Syria. 

I mean Jesus Christ Almighty! Baku is one of the world's biggest and most efficient oil refining centers, and right next door is Turkey which borders Syria.  

Anyway...

Just so as you dimwits monitoring here can get really *-off, one of my personal friends is a guy called Ahmed Stambouli (not the artist guy), and he's an Algerian who happens to be a billionaire. 

Trust me when I say this, that when people like Stambouli get irritated, they just commission someone to go out and put a bullet through your head.

Now, that's why I am very friendly, towards him, see. I don't want to get on his wrong side.

So, what were the UK Navy actually up to?

Now what the hell flag is this boat flying?

The story is that the Americans said 'jump' to the UK - and they did.

And jump what? Something big and fat and obviously sailing to Syria. LOL

The trouble with propaganda is it has the power to turn your head into quicksand and you will sink in it and you will suffocate.

I make no secret of the fact that I use these pages as propaganda.

Many more types of poison than just Novichok and some of it is not only more surreptitious but a whole lot more far-reaching and toxic because you will not die, but you will live with the pain of the poison and the sound knowledge that you yourself opened the box you were told not to go anywhere near. Because it was poisonous.

Here's the problem with real propaganda though - it pulls you into a death spiral and you cannot get out:

the BBC interviewed someone who knew one of these Paris 'terrorists' and was himself also from Algiers - and he told the blatant lie that French people and well, just everyone, really, despises Algerians... And disregards them. To the point that it gives some basis to understand the hatred of an Algerian for Parisians so much so that his animus makes him knife someone or shoot them or run them over or blow them up.

Er. Oka-a-a-y.

As for me, I don't have that perspective of Algerians. And neither did Jim Morrison of the Doors. He used to read Albert Camus (born in Algeria). 

There are a lot of occultists particularly, as well as literature scholars, who have read the Golden Ass by Apuleius. 

I think probably Shakespeare read Apuleius.

Apuleius was an Algerian.