Pompeo Says 'No Direct Evidence.'

The biggest reason I'm noting this item that has appeared very quietly in 'some' of the major mainstream media outlets, is that it will give you another reminder of just how sinister and heavy-duty today's media is.

In almost every one of the reports that I have read today, what the US Secretary of State said, is tucked away as a one-line sentence, even less in some articles, whilst the whole thing is couched basically inside of huge opposing stories and loud gainsaying. 

Given what we have seen across the whole world's media over the last month, you can see how little chance ordinary people have of getting true reports of anything anymore.

Going by the BBC's report today, you would think that Mike Pompeo actually disputes what the CIA has said, whereas in fact, he underlined that the CIA 'has absolutely no direct evidence at all, that Crown Prince Salman is implicated in the murder of Jamal Khashoggi.'

Mohammed Rashid and his son - and Crown Prince Salman
the new face of Perrier Mineral Water

You see, all you have seen in the press, is a 'leaked' report, from an 'unnamed source' to the effect that the CIA's report to the President says there is a 'high confidence assessment' saying that Crown Prince Salman was involved - and that is utterly false; no such report was made, no such report exists, no such assessment was rendered. The end.

So you were outright told a lie.

But not only were you told a lie, but you were told it over and over and over with an ever heightening tone of frenzy. 

And then when the true official report was stated, this was actually deliberately gainsaid and overturned with the counter-narrative.

Why? Why do we need to be told lies? Even if Salman let's say had have actually ordered the killing what is the difference between letting everyone know there is a difficult, a problematic, even a dangerous situation with respect to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia - and instead telling absolute non-factual, in other words, outright lies to seemingly, impress the same point?

You see, it's actually NOT the same point.

What they are trying to do is assign moral judgments (in)to your consciousness: Erdogan (Muslim Brotherhood 'good'), Crown Prince Salman (not Muslim Brotherhood 'bad').

And as I noted a little earlier, George Soros has pulled his operations out of Turkey.

George Soros. GS.

GS. Goldman Sachs.

Floating Petrodollars.

I mean, seriously, don't you think that if 'George Soros' really were some kind of financial markets investor on the grand scale, that he would currently be back in London making merry about the Pound dropping to oblivion and helping it along to do that? Which is supposedly, how he made his money in the first place.

Why now, suddenly, does he not want that, and instead want to secure the power bloc of the Eu-Zone?

Turkish ceramic plates - very nice

Because he's not an investor, and he's never been an investor. He is a front for the Petrodollar capital bloc which includes half of Saudi Arabia, a lot of Jordan, all of Qatar, all of Kuwait, Iran by several back doors, Turkey - and he wanted Venezuela and he got Sri Lanka for a while, and so on and on. So we are talking mainstream big league accounting firms (and these 'management consultancies and global marketing consultancies') and their lawyer firm lackeys. That's all.

Sure, surely I can get out of this politics nonsense soon, dammit! Christmas is nearly upon us!!