Confronting Major War

I think we have to confront the on-coming major global war - or, face the fact that we are actually in one now. This is only prudent.

Those of you who have been consistent readers here will recall a point about a year or so ago when I voiced great disappointment that 'something' had happened, and events were being spoken about, in dark circles, that I could hardly credit.

Valerie Plame - or Valerie Wilson

Valerie Plame, the outed CIA operative, whose cover was blown by Dick Cheney, wrote in her latest book - 'Burned' - that Islamic State had the potential to get its hands on a small nuclear device of some kind. In her book, she pinpoints Paris and Amsterdam as important places where the terrorist networks are highly active and dangerously poised.

In doesn't really matter at this stage, whether or not her books are merely CIA propaganda exercises, that she has had to allow be published in her name in order to secure her own personal security. What is relevant to the larger public, is that so-called 'terrorism' is sufficiently well and truly out of control, that a formal multi-front, multi-national 'war condition' is declared by various governments.

For my own part, I fully accept that a lot of what we see in the news media, be they actual real events having taken place, or concocted, highly stage-managed, arranged affairs - are driven from well behind the scenes in places from where conspiracy thinkers regularly locate the ultimate blame. 

One could hardly forget that Pearl Harbor is openly said by many authoritative historians, to have been 'exploited' by the US hawks, in order to break a policy of so-called 'splendid isolation.'  And the only way such a thing might have been achieved, if you accept the proposition that it was indeed done this way - is that central banking, global media, and war industry together with politicians, all have to conspire together at once.

But as I say, the reality of who and why and even 'whether' is moot; the practice is that such a thing is openly unfolding before our eyes. One could hardly think that Janet Yellen is in a different position from Bernard Baruch, or that Netanyahu is less of a warmonger than Stalin... No, today, it's all exactly as it was prior to Pearl Harbor.

If people really wanted peace, they would and can act differently to the way they are acting.

Instead, we have President Obama doing the 'Egalite, Fraternite, Liberte' speech in a very bad attempted French accent, and promising to act against terrorists 'who are attacking our citizens...'

In front of 'the gates of Janus' - the two-faced 'god.'

What he should have said is 'we are going to stop them and make everyone's lives safe again.' But he didn't say that. What he said was - or, it amounted to: 'we are going to let them kill citizens, and then we are going to kill Jihad Johnny and' (he literally did say this next bit) 'we are going to work with all our media friends to get/show what we do out to the public.' Let me explain.

History, if it maintains the record of what he said and what he says, is going to look back and say, 'well we know exactly what he said. And it is clear enough what those words actually mean. He certainly never lied to anyone.' You see he never once said anything like 'we are going to STOP them attacking out citizens.' What he said was, 'we are going to act WHEN they attack our citizens.'

You have to factor into your plans, and the plans for your own life, as if and as though we are actually in a state of major, global, and very likely catastrophic war. This means massive numbers of dead. That's what war means.