They think it is bad because they sense something...
And of course they are certainly right.
A generation of people - those who wrecked everything in the Sixties by taking advantage of the losses of the leadership strata caused by WWII - have wreaked absolute havoc since they were teenagers, consuming things like a gigantic global plague of locusts, and now are old and dying.
Those who have the game beat - are all on their own in empty spaces right now. There's no one else there where they are.
They've left nothing behind.
The world is a complete mess and a cultural desert.
The general public does not have the brainpower to create anything exciting and new anymore.
You just have to take a short journey through the New York subway to see the standard of the advertisements - the marketing to the public - to understand that things could not be more dire.
Meanwhile one of our tribe here - Lachlan K., (aka 'Lachie') - will be attending probably the Glass Slipper party in Venice for this year's Carnival there.
He is not feeling any sensations of something dire or dismal coming up around the corner.
He is from a staggeringly rich family of construction managers and engineers.
Your problem of course is not if or whether you will all of a sudden come into a lot of wealth - but more what you would do with it.
Definitely it is no longer the case that one can sit back wherever one is, in the middle of the disasters going on in cities and the ideological and social car-crashes taking place in politics everywhere in the West, and hope to be unnoticed by everyone else.
It's Winter in the Northern Hemisphere, a late Winter and the cold is still there everywhere. But it's also a kind of 'social Winter' for people too, as their systems of personal interactions run down into the final decline that will 'take out' the world as we know it.
There are secrets about this world that you don't yet know the whole of...
There is a power that has held itself back, in the wings, as it were, while the idle tale told by idiots dominated the stage and took the spotlight.
...Only for the 'idle tale tellers' to be the metaphorical clowns in the glare of that light, as they struggle for air in their own death throes -, and with no help coming to save them.
Jesus is not coming for them. And they are going to die out and be forgotten.
You are the future. You are the only future.
So you'd better have Contact.
It's Winter. 'Civilization' (the old human one) is covered in snow and is dead. But who are the ones of the future? Where do they come from. Where did they come from.
I mean of course there will be stories in the general media over the next few days and weeks that are about current affairs and will be very drawing of everyone's attention because they contain many titillating elements.
They're interesting stories to the extent that they can grab your attention and make you wonder what really is going on 'up there in the big league' of politics and public figures.
They're about money, power, and sex and everyone will jump to wrong conclusions about 'who' and 'why.'
You don't need to wonder.
Pack your intellectual bags. You're going somewhere.
It's all just plain old 'normal' political stuff - some of it will be on the national/global scales.
What I am trying to do here though, is turn to very prosaic matters: how to calculate the actual winding-through-its-curves length of any river... For example.
The answer is that all rivers are in actual length 3.14 times their direct route distance from source to the sea.
We all look at the economic scene and around ourselves and what we have and what we do for a living each day and say: 'If only I won the major lottery prize.'
Yeah? And if you did?
Then what?
What would you do then?
Someone who knew enough of the Forms could easily take a moderately-deep look at any specific present economic context and derive exact calculated conclusions about how to make money with little 'frictional cost,' as they say.
At the same time though, if we took the modern-day 'New Age-y' 'manifestation' proposition at face value -, it is still not so easy to mentally picture, to envisage, what your life would really look life if you suddenly had an additional, say, fifty million dollars.
For one thing you don't really believe that you can make such a sum readily - maybe you could or you might 'win' it but there is no credibility inside your head to the proposition that you will make it as a genuine calculation from some given bases.
Seemingly calm and quiet, it is teeming with life.
So you can't 'see' what really, things would look like when you genuinely had such sizable sums at your fingertips.
Hey I mean it costs around forty thousand dollars a year just for the tires on a Bugatti Veyron...
LOL
Artists can see such things without the baggage of at the same time thinking about having to drive past all of the starving, the homeless... ...people.
You just 'imagine' things like heaven. And places where there are actual, for-real 'angelic beings.'
You don't believe it.
You don't actual believe it.
You might hope it, but you don't believe it.
But I'm here to convince you about their reality.
Not their speculative possibility; their reality.
Did you not yet get the amazing sense of humor of God?!
Long ago, God was the Bread of Life.
This week, I absolutely guarantee you that on more than one occasion, you looked forward to eating with great engagement in the proposition.
Well, the Bread of Life was great for 'in the past.' It's still great but there's more.
Today God is the spicy curry and rice of life.
How do you figure that you will 'worship' - I mean really really worship - a god or His/Her/Their/Its Angel/s, when you have far greater visceral desire and feelings and pleasure from the future prospect and then the act, of eating...
It's good to eat, and very good to enjoy what you eat. Treat it as a real sacrament. Unless you feel, how you can know God?
You meet literal, real God and then what -? Does it make you desire your food more, or perhaps enjoy it better because all of your worries would have been removed then?
God is food though.
On the obvious material plane you cannot live with food.
On the in-obvious plane you still cannot live without food because you are a material creature that needs food to survive.
Consuming food is an 'all-of-the-senses' thing.
An 'all-of-the-senses' thing. God-like... Right? LOL
How can it be that encountering a supremely powerful intelligent being is less of an actual sense experience?
Scientists talk of the bio-chemistry of satisfaction when it comes to the subject of food.
Psychologists know better.
Today we literally have millions and millions of adult people, stabbing themselves in the stomach with an eight-inch pen-like device with a needle that secretes chemicals which lower your (their) appetite.
In order to really get to grips with what the Moses story is all about we must come to terms with some facts and leave behind the various versions that cannot be verified in history or from archaeology.
The story of a prince of Egypt found in bulrushes by a princess is categorically an Egyptian story from actual real sources and not narrated later 'versions' in the hands of completely different ethnic people.
There isn't any historical evidence for a kingdom of 'Northern Israel;' all of that area was sequentially Assyrian and Babylonian - so much so that in fact even modern-day Jews call some ancient literature the Babylonian Talmud/Babylonian Talmud sources.
A 'life force' comes into Thuthmose II's hands...
The story of a super-wealthy and highly intelligent, especially wise, ruler with a palace floor that looked like still water - is a categorically Egyptian one about one of the 'Amenhotep' Pharaoh figures. So, 'Sol' Amun, or Amun-Ra: this is Solomon.
It already is the case that linguistically 'Theuth' is 100% the early Egyptian name later transliterated as 'Dawud' and 'David.'
So, if you remove the surface layer of story about 'Moses' getting to read or to 'see' the written-down 'laws' of God, and move to the actual physical evidence and the independent accounts of what this all is, we come to the capstone images and Plato's statement that his uncle was told by Egyptian priests that there was an archive of important things like that, begun way back by the god Hermes and given to the Egyptian temple priests. These archives contain some depictions of the 'Forms.'
The modern phraseology about the 'Theory of Forms' is not actually from the texts in which those 'Forms' are talked about and explained a little - because in those texts simply nothing about them are 'theories!'
When we go to great modern museums of science and philosophy around the world today, we will see stagnant, static, lifeless shapes that it is true, are the exact things that comprise all atomic structures - but this depiction is a false one which does not follow what the early writers' ideas said.
The actual explanation of things goes like this: there is no separate place somewhere in which somehow 'subsists' or 'exists' a perfect heaven which is nevertheless physically apart from this Cosmos.
There is only this Cosmos.
A new museum of fragrances in Paris - but it correctly links each museum item to specific people of the related time. The true place of 'Cosmic Forms' is not entirely dissimilar, except the people are real people. Unlike the museum, these people are not pictures only, or images; they are actual real beings.
The one inside of which you exist materially and physically.
But what is also in it, are beings - since intelligent life is dynamic and necessarily... ...alive - who are closer to the perfect Forms beneath which all other forms are lesser examples thereof.
And those who are the highest of all such intelligent beings, see and perceive and understand and comprehend these Forms better than all others - and they are the living gods, united to the perfect Forms themselves because the ultimate Form is that of Perfect Beauty and Livingness. So they are all connected up in the same way that the bloodstream and the nerves and so on connect up the human body to its brain and of course to our consciousness.
The format of connection must be something like the neutrino field or something akin to that. It is not lines and cabling and structural material.
Because the Cosmos is extremely vast, and filled with every strata of 'lesser' iterations of forms and also lesser beings too (not in the sense that an animal is presumed a lesser being than a human because it is not...) - then there also are beings, aka 'people' like we find here on the planet, who are in no way even close to the perfect Forms and nor are they at all connected up as one living organism in the Cosmos; but they are capable of seeing 'as through a glass darkly,' that there are such perfect levels and things and relationships and connections and also, the power that falls to that highest layer.
These are the beings, the people, who erroneously aspire to position themselves in what they take to be the Ultimate Throne place - in other words, they imagine that they can be 'God.'
I believe that even the story about some figure, some 'identity' almost every culture calls 'Satan' (in its own language), is correct, but only insofar as it is relating an account of some ambitious character who was never even close to actually 'seeing' or understanding the true apex existential realities.
The Earth is just like one narrow hall in the Great Hall.
These human stories say the Satanic personage sought to gain the ultimate place of power, and fell from there.
That's not a possibility. The closer one gets to the Forms, the more one becomes intertwined with them.
And being intertwined with them, one cannot then do 'Evil' since the Forms themselves are the Good and like fire does not entertain ice, 'Evil' cannot exist in the field of Perfect Good.
...We have been providing essential ingredients and psychological tools to find the Forms and to become physically and materially linked with them.
You will not next become materially poorer as the result of such connection. But you will become materially richer.
You will be richer, but you will also become richer as the evidence of the underlying connection fact is revealed and unfolds.
When we start from the ordinary human level, the process is one of becoming. When we get fairly close the state is a permanent one of life and dynamic relationship with something we must term 'Cosmic.'
This is wrong in that it only shows a static format - although it is otherwise okay; and it would not be so critical if not for the fact that it (not this chart!) was in the early 'Christian' text sections of the Dead Sea Scrolls. You cannot know the Christian conception of 'heaven' unless you factor in this because this is the 'secret sealed books' (sealed up until the Time of the End). A true depiction that is not static, shows people - actual specific people and kinds of people (as Plato puts it, 'those who follow most closely in the train of...').
It is not any more merely becoming, but it is still nevertheless moving and flowing and alive.
As I said before, artists and musicians particularly, gain very direct access to such knowledge and connectedness because they are viscerally moving into various resonant phases of 'intelligible energy.'
I will go through a short list of what you will see is someone 'seeing' ahead what has happened, and then on to an example of where someone 'sees' to what can only happen to narrow groups, and then on to an example of where very small numbers can get close to the much much more advanced things.
Here is the first. You know what this is about.
People like the modern producer Max Martin are deep into the processes of how to 'get there.'
The person who wrote this and played the keyboards on this track below was the producer for Annie Lennox and the Eurythmics.
This world is set up on a mercantile materialistic basis.
The trading is entirely in money.
Money is the mediation between needs and wants and desires and having those negotiated in.
Alongside that though is a system of conditions set up by ruling powers. Jeffrey Epstein could not trade his way out of a situation in which he had risen to hold power over others who did not want him to have that kind of power.
Every main element of this image has an exact correspondence inside of your psychological make-up.
In that situation no amount of money would alter that opposition arrayed against him because fundamentally it came down to a question of absolute power not trade mediation tokens.
Now go back to this context:
A certain small group of people did not wish to be enslaved and dominated, nor to follow or be commanded, by one absolute ruler known as the Pharaoh, and so they substituted that situation for another one in which they were dominated, ruled over, commanded and enslaved by a different (really?) figure known as Yahweh.
Muslims do the exact same thing: they seemingly 'voluntarily' are enslaved by two figures in tandem, one which is putative in Islam as a unique godhead known as 'Allah' but in fact this is jointly with a human figure that is 'Allah's' sole and unique messenger, known nowadays (although in the past many people had the same title) as 'Muhammad' which simply means 'the praiseworthy.' In Islam this is taken to be a specific individual and not all those others in the past who also carried the same title - Jesus did, Socrates did, even 'Bulus' (the Apostle Paul), and Abd'al Malik ibn Marwan who styled himself on several coin effigies as 'the praiseworthy one.'
Human beings are thus, on the whole, culturally, en masse, socially, sociologically, and religiously of course, slaves with absolutely no power and no say - no agency, as it were, over the god-like sets of decisions that could or might be made by intelligent sentient beings.
Well what then really makes 'humans' intelligent?
They claim to be, but are they?
...They seem to be intent on having some quite literally invisible, possibly even non-existent cultural folk legend figure or myth, identity rule over them in an absolute way.
'Scientists' do the exact same thing.
Paul Cox has been on major platforms saying that 'even up till the Sixties, people widely thought that there were whole cities and civilizations on the planet Mars...'
Did they?
Was it not scientists though, in the same years who thought and taught in every single University in the planet that there were not any other stars with planets orbiting them like what was obtaining in our solar system? And then, a decade later they were still teaching as 'scientific truth' that in any case there were no moons on any such planets and certainly no water and no life of any kind elsewhere.
Now there are zillions of such stars and planets and moons and indications of the chemical conditions for life...
What's the difference between any of them?
They're all ideologues who literally actually 'know' nothing for real.
In order to say and to maintain rationally that there is a god, one must be able to evidence the same.
Instead of asserting the contrary position from the absent evidence as the 'true' situation, scientists if they were being honest and intelligent, would simply say 'I don't know what is there.'
What they do is say 'because I have no evidence then the contrary is true.' That is a patently false and a foolish statement or else if knowingly done, then it is extremely malicious and gulling. Yet that is what they do.
There is no one, on the throne seat on her head. Now, if I showed you what is seated on the 'right hand' of the throne, what will you say then? Jesus only came for 'the lost sheep of the House ('House' is 'Pharaoh' in the Kemetic) of Theuth (David). There are no 'Jews' involved. His ancestor was Asaneith. She is plainly Graeco-Egyptian.
We can see plainly that our cells are in a state of constant growth, decline, and destruction and terminating replacement.
If you ever encountered some situation though, in which this was no longer the case, it would turn your world completely upside down.
Because have you honestly and really contemplated the exact situation if you never died at all, your defective cells and hard internal structures were being replaced perfectly and not in declining iterations of quality, and your sensory acquisition capabilities were enhanced in leaps beyond what you currently are able to 'see' with your present senses?
What things then become the prime goals of your sentient desires...
Is it buying the best house in Lake Tahoe or in Aspen?
Or is it having the best people around you and right at that point do you start to 'see' (perceive) how great their shortcomings are in that new situation and context - and then how will you arrange for them to resolve those shortcomings?
This kind of power means you instantly experience incredible temptation! And you have to deal with that and manage that.
The expression of what that all means inside, inside your consciousness, your emotional make-up, your thinking - is the province of the artists. There are some who are reflecting or presenting what they are picking up as fields of information, not words and sentence structures in common conscious language forms.
Here is where you can gain some insight into what the leap forward means.
The leap forward is only prospective, and speculative, when people are theorizing.
Artists are not theorizing; they are presenting as emotional fact, a particular real experienced case - that you can also experience via the specific art form involved.
I'm not sure whether those of you who have followed the recent 'ritual' methodology you might call it, have yet realized what you do with what you feel and what you see.
Islam says 'Allah' is God not Yahweh - but it says 'YaYa' and 'Yusuf' are real prophets; yet those names mean prophets of Jah/Yahweh. In other words, Islam doesn't know what it is talking about either. 'Y' 'H' 'V' 'H' is the throne on which there is no person that you can see. It's not 'there's no one there...'
To put it bluntly, you inspire. You inhale what you receive.
In a womb you do not breathe air.
In space you do not breathe air either. But you do breathe.
Inside these white Tic Tacs nobody has air to breathe. But they do breathe.
...People constantly ask why all this 'meditation stuff' when you are just trying to get into a space craft and fly around in a real, material way.
Well do you just stick on an aqualung and jump into the deep sea? Do you do that, if you are a deep sea diver?
Oh trust me. This stuff is very real and it is completely material and hard, physical technology.
It is something like a radio transceiver system plus a cellular super-positioning digital restructuring computer working on whole electron fields with flows and atomic 'printing.'
You can fly.
Yes you can. You must breathe a different kind of air, imbibe a different kind of light. And then what is in you then (which came from above) can take you back to 'above' where the atmosphere is very different indeed. And, like Courtney Brown who has been there and come back, you will experience the effects of time dilation. He is a lot older than he looks right now.
...the Alien craft, the mother-ships and so on, if they're there, out in space at least not too far from us?
See, 'we' are the enemy. Maybe not you, but the human race at large. And especially in its controlled, restricted imprisoned structure as a species.
The human race is not this thing that all religions want to have you think is some magnificent, grand, creation of God. It is a stock-standard thing, which is everywhere across the whole Universe in great numbers; that is to say, in those places where there is advanced life and there are quite a few of those.
Standard religions teach 'sin.'
Just look how many stars are in the sky. 'God' is an ineffable Being. But because we are among the categories of peak intelligent beings, Divinity is accessible to us but only if you use your brains and employ Wisdom...
No. What it is is 'flawed.'
Take a look up at the night sky. The Universe is vast.
Now I am going to show you something from the Bible, that you have never seen before, and if it were not there it would be fine - except it is there. And that's the problem.
The problem is not for you but for those people who go around declaring what it is they (think) they know and what they assume the Bible says and is all about.
We all know the Garden of Eden story.
There is a word in there translated as 'tree.' And this has always and everywhere had the sense of literally being the Tree of Life for human beings.
Suddenly in the narrative though, you can eat of all of the fruit of this tree except not this certain one - because then you will die.
Except that is actually not what it says. It says some members of the Elohim conferred together (and these were explicitly those who had established this particular 'Tree of Life' in the center of this particular 'Garden of Eden), and they decided something because they feared something about you.
And they said among each other: 'Look, if the humans stretch forth their hand and take and eat of the Fruit of Eternal Life - behold they will become like us, and live forever.'
And what would be the problem with that?
Well in the first place, obviously it was these people (beings/'Elohim' whatever) who had done the errant thing, not the humans - since they feared something both had gone amiss and would further go amiss towards themselves! Religions try to make up a justification for this by saying 'oh well they knew anyway and this was so that humans could be chucked out of this pampered Paradise and grow up...'
What a lot of bally nonsense.
These other beings concerned about humans getting to live forever were clearly worried about their own skins in that regard thereupon!
Now here's your absolute iron-clad proof for this reading of it.
'Tree' is not tree at all. The word is 'Ish-Sha.' And it comes from the Assyrian root 'Asherah.'
All the Asherah symbolism absolutely everywhere (and you all well know this) is literally a twelve-fruited stylized 'tree.' And it is taken to mean the Source of Life and the Tree of Life in the Assyrian system.
Asherah is the feminine form of the real Godhead which is material reality (mater = mother).
Whoever was taking up this position as depicted everywhere in the standard religions as 'The One (Who - says that it - Is/God)' is antithetical to the material existence of human people as rulers of this planet and casts himself (and clearly it is a 'he' form of being) as the absolute ruler and also the maker of all ultimate laws. Well that in the first place is an impossibility: the Laws of reality and material existence are self-existential things and they are many and they are highly complex but they intertwine and co-operate and co-ordinate and do not require some assertion of their power to actually hold power (over literally everything). They maybe require revelation of their power to dumb humans, but to be asserted is to in first place devalue the human form of intelligence. So that's obviously and self-evidently logically a wrong thing, that idea of someone 'asserting (Divine) laws.' They either are, or they are not. And intelligent minds can comprehend them.
In the Christian New Account of things, Jesus does in fact not sit in the Throne of Absolute Monarch God but on the right hand of God's Throne!
I can give you countless Biblical references for this if you wish but it's redundant to do that.
'Jesus' is material 'Son of -.' That is His Title: Son of God.
The 'Ish-Sha' or the 'Asherah' means 'Giver of Riches.' That is from where you get to stop being a 'loser.' Anyway you're not a loser, but I know what you mean - you mean you want to mix it with the 'in crowd' and have all their kinds of material wealth.
Everybody knows this.
Jesus's story was that He was here to 'pull down the ruler of this world' and that it would take a strong man to depose this very strong individual who had taken over the house.
He further depicted the whole thing as this place being like a rich man's vineyard and that the owner had gone away on a long journey of trade or business or something.
So now where does this all lead us?
Well for one thing you cannot go thinking about some 'divine source of Light' in terms of Biblical 'Yahweh.'
That is just the depiction about a character who tried to rule and firm-up absolute overlordship here by force - but even so, he was using this 'Yud Keh Vav Keh' rubric.
Shamanic American and South American and even many other indigenous people have the straight-out concept of 'hey' as the sound meaning of embodied living breath and energy.
Hey Nah Hey Nah Hey Nah - is what American Native Tribal Shamans intone when they are doing certain key rituals.
'I' - yes, we understand that; it is 'I/intelligent consciousness.' 'Hey' or the Hebrew 'Hkey' and the Egyptian 'Heka' - means breathing alive energy.
'Vav' is the same as the Sanskrit 'Om.'
And either the first or the second 'Hey' is the symbolic idea of that breath coming down from some 'heavenly' source - in other words it is a spiritual, and probably also, divine 'breath.'
Categorically the straightforward New Testament Biblical teaching is that there was and still is (the remnants of) a 'War in Heaven.'
Well what makes it that our understanding must evade the question of whether or not - especially when we look up at the night sky and see its vastness - this is and was literally a physical material war between huge intelligent groups of people ('beings' if you insist)...
But let's go back to the proposition that we are the problem here!
If this world is ruled and governed by a set of beings whose purpose was to construct some soldiers for itself, then some humans likely very much are installed with incredibly devious, destructive, malicious, and evil programming.
Garden of Eden stuff. The Golden Age.
How can you tell which people? They all look the same on the outside (means superficially) because they all share similar DNA.
There is nobody in the seat of this Ultimate 'Yud Keh Vav Keh.' Let me say it in a better way though - there is nobody that you or I can 'see' there. There is easily the proposition that such a thing can have a 'deep fake' of it though which is 'shown' to say for example, credulous and also quite innocent humans; and then they all follow that assuming it to be 'God.' And they do whatever that voice tells them to do.
But you, you are maybe not mixed up too much with the mal-intended contrived version of humans - and are mostly the Asherah material componentry.
You will respond to what sounds truly appropriate and not to what sounds extremely suspect.
So when you do any kinds of these remote viewing or whatever, rituals, and sense there is some kind of 'light' or some force coming to you, you will most certainly be able to know whether it is 'Good' or not good.
Try to 'remote view' for an actual mother-ship and perhaps some of its occupants and try to 'tap one of them on the shoulder' to get their attention and have you beamed up.
The opposition force on the whole is completely still intact down here on this planet. And it is dangerously damaged and depleted and with its back to the wall.
But it is cornered nonetheless.
You will be able to get in touch with the proper people. They will organize very highly restricted kinds of interactions and ways and means of getting you material support.
Should we be able to see, literally see off-world ships and their occupants?
Gary McKinnon said he had hacked into a Pentagon list of off-world military units and commands. Stan Deyo said the US had anti-gravity equipment since as far back as maybe the early Sixties.
Well McKinnon they very nearly threw into a maximum security US prison for life and Stan they have tried to kill many times.
What -. Do you feel left out of all of this? Do you want to go fly in those craft now?
.jpg)
.jpg)
