Two days ago I got a phone call from Nathan Burley, the marketing manager, I guess - although he is a capable wine-maker in his own right too - of one of the greatest wineries in the world today -, and he was just such a wonderful gentleman. We talked a little, as a side-note, about Dennis Lillee, arguably the greatest fast bowler (cricketer) of all time, who lives not very far from my present daily hang-out in front of some pretty sophisticated computers, and who is off to visit Nathan Burley's place in a few days...
But mainly we talked about some wine.
Right now you won't necessarily see any connection with what has been the usual fare on these pages but not long from now a few things will eventuate and everything will make just a little bit more sense.
I don't personally know Dennis Lillee, but a senior business partner of myself and a couple of people here, Bill Cocks, not with us anymore sadly, knew him quite well enough to be more than just a passing acquaintance, and I've met Lillee briefly in that context (of high level professional sports and also business affairs).
By this November it will have become clear that not only has the Ukraine and NATO and the US lost the war in the Ukraine, but that they have done that comprehensively so.
...Anyone imaging that the Kremlin will not decapitate Kiev when that place is finally fully exposed and weak and vulnerable is living in a fantasy.
The risks therefore, are now tremendously high that the US will provoke a nuclear exchange to try and turn around what is otherwise an impossible situation.
So that's what you are looking at, in terms of the near future and what that future holds for the world, for the planet.
You might be a person living in a daydream that you are 'on the right side' or on 'the side of the good people,' but the governments of the Western World lost all credibility once they permitted the illegal detention of Julian Assange without trial. Lost -, not 'are losing;' actually lost.
We are living in extremely dangerous times -, and no, not just dangerous; perilous.
But I am expecting all of you to have your wits completely about you, to have your brains working - and working well.
Most others will lose their heads.
Don't you do it.
It's kinda crass, but hey, still looks pretty cool tho.
Okay let's say you are thinking 'no, no way will there be a nuclear exchange!'
But you are not using your brains here, in thinking that.
The principles that guide the hands of the ruling elites are not the ones that you were raised in school to believe are the principles, and which therefore you are attributing to those who sit in government, and whom you may have thought were just people from your own ranks.
At all costs they must maintain power over you. They have nothing else to fall back on. They cannot farm, they cannot fish, they cannot actually hunt, and they cannot gather - they can only rob and kill: you.
This is Cain.
And this type of affair will explode on the world stage over the next few days and weeks and months.
There will be killing, that is, murder, and there will be mass destruction.
Meanwhile, we'll be drinking the wine.
Hmn. ...And from out of his treasury, he brings the old, and the new. Matthew 13: 51 - 53
Because, the wine-press is being brought into the picture.
'Come, tread, for the wine-press is full; for their wickedness is great.'
Doubt this at your extreme peril.
These things are in Joel 3: 13 - 14, which talk about multitudes upon multitudes in the Valley of Decision; otherwise referred to incorrectly as 'Judgment' by modern commentaries.
And also in Revelation 17.
You are going to be drinking wine.
The amount of lying in the media and by governments is going to prove simply astonishing to you. That is, prove to have been simply breathtakingly audacious.
Wasn't 'rocket parts,' by the way... Rocket parts don't send gas plasma beams shining straight ahead before them as they slide sideways across the sky.
There are things going on that the world does not know, does not understand - because it does not know us.
Whatever your current situation in life, you are part of a circle. And that circle is very powerful, except not in the way power is regarded in the ordinary day-to-day world.
This circle has the power to do things others will never be able to do.
This means something to one of you...
And you yourself know the way. You know the 'door' and you know the path to it: you can go in and return back.
...Maybe you are only just at the arrival stage yourself, to the party.
But persevere. Stay on in there.
Open the big doors.
Most people are quite oblivious to what is going on. And some people think they know but they don't know.
People are carrying on like they always did: 'as in the days of Noah (the fourth from Enoch - who was taken by the Elohim and was found no more here on the Earth).'
You know that saying.
Well that saying is true.
***
Team JES just sent a wonderful personal video message to the MERRIWA Primary School where I am on the Board there, and where 'Amanda' and 'Bill' and others here are massive supporters - and which is also the location of the 'front-end' of our work with the Autistic (mainly) kids as well as other kids with various disabilities - and they are going to be blown away when they see it.
She (JES) is part of a group of very talented musicians and composers who have worked on massively-successful mainstream projects like 'Finding Nemo' and 'The Fast and the Furious' and 'Lara Croft: Tomb Raider,' and 'Die Hard Trilogy 2: Viva Las Vegas...' Among a huge swathe of amazing output. But above all they are really nice people.
This is pretty 'fast and furious!'
There is a lot of connection with this league with 'Downunder' where I am, because this same sort of musical genre and circle includes people like Emma Hewitt and Tyson Illingworth (EH: from Sydney and 'TyDi:' from Brisbane), not to mention that MaRLo although usually regarded as a Dutch musician, is in fact mostly based just up the road from me here just north of Perth City - to say nothing of the fact that Darude (of monster global EDM hit 'Sandstorm' fame) comes down here very regularly to the Bar 1 facility at Hillarys Boat Harbor (nothing to do with H. Clinton! lol) to DJ live (and to the park across from me to skate-board! He's an avid, virtually pro-level skate-boarder).
I won't play the personal video message here until the School Board and kids there get to see it first which will be at least some time after the next Full Board Meeting this month later.
Plenty of music clips anyway in the meantime.
***
We'll save up the JES videos and the BT and TyDi videos for later. Right now let's spin a recent release that is hitting it on the serious heavy Trance and 'Intelligent Digital Music' dance-floor (did you even know there was such a thing? Well there is...) scene with DJ's the likes of Farius and Markus Schulz.
Find us in the circle; find your place in the circle.
Hayla - sings below:
[Doorman: 'You have to advise re necessary age requirements.'
As much as we all want to go back to 'a happier time,' or what seems in our memory as such a thing, we are all in a process of moving from one state of being - to another.
And that earlier state is one of a temporal curve with an ending. In that condition we are always materially changing, adding bone and tissue and sinew: a woman at fifty has an underlying fifty-year depth of literal layers.
No matter what you do to your outer appearance, at fifty there is a certain kind of specific substance beneath the surface.
It's just olive oil...
Pictures of a person at any given age are just snapshot cross-sections of the whole being in view.
Great ancient religious and philosophical texts attest to the fact that people have to change from the terminally changing 'thing' that each of them is, to an immortal one. But each 'snapshot' image is still totally a valid expression of that person, that individual - and yet, who they are as a complete being, is something quite different to just any one particular snapshot taken in time.
When we wish to steer away from relating to reflections and representations of individuals, we have to accept not to try or try to simply 'go back.' Because you can't go back in that way - not back to the mortal condition.
Representations (of people which they make themselves through manufactured self-expression) are tricky things to the psyche because they are really like the person in question; after all they represent that person. They stand for that person.
Humans grow either towards the new, materially different, and completely real - or else they just go ever further into the representational only; which is death in the end. That's why people talk about and cling onto memories at funerals.
When you look at by far the majority of all the people that you meet in the course of the day, their 'self-expressed' personal image is false - it is engineered by society, which itself is driven by falsehood and the worshiping of advantage. That someone is born with material advantages tells us nothing about the person themselves.
That someone rises to positions of advantage tells us only that they met certain necessary conditions of a given historical moment.
So...
To express yourself as you truly are, is not just a representation of who you are, it is who you are.
To meet the conditions that take one out of the dying and transitory material trajectory what are the necessary elements?
Plato sets them out.
LOL - Oh yes he does.
Some Vedic scholars have an insight into them.
Parmenides did too but crucial verses of his written work are lost.
The Biblical word 'Apocalyptic' - as Paul Wallis correctly explains - means that someone is reporting an experience so strange to them, so lacking ties to the previous 'usual,' and 'normal,' that some kind of revealing of truth is required. So it doesn't actually mean that in the Biblical text itself where the passages are 'Apocalyptic' things are being revealed; it means they will be revealed when there is better information later.
This is why when some disciples who met the risen Jesus on the road to the Hot Springs (Imwas/Emmaus) - and did not recognize him - He 'revealed to them the Scriptures that previously no one had understood.'
They only recognized Him - even after having had these mysterious passages' meanings revealed to them - when He broke some bread; which was the key ritual they knew that was to do with His dying and leaving them.
He must not have looked visually the same as what they had been used to seeing, prior to then, in their old material lives.
Right now some of you might be thinking, okay well, armed with a lot of new(-ish) and quite interesting information and psychological techniques, I will just (would like to just) meet some cool people and they will get on with me and I will get on with them and we will all have fun together because we are all so amazingly good now, at relating.
So then fine but what happens when y'all get lots of wrinkles and sick from old age and then all eventually die? No problem, right, because everything being so great well you'll just put up with it and feign obliviousness and live like every other schizophrenic human being on the planet.
...You can't go back.
But let's go back to an Apocalyptic passage:
"And the Ark of the Living God was opened for the first time in heaven."
"And light shone from it and thunders pealed and lightning was witnessed and voices and great hail."
"And the nations were angry, and thy wrath has come."
(It's probably not in order because I'm quoting it off the top of my head but it's all roughly in the same place).
...When those of you who have been able to go to the White Room, do that, what you are doing is using only one of three dynamic internal mechanisms that you have.
[So I've just removed the technical details of the rest of the matter, but -].
Anyway.
When you think about what you are meant to be looking for, it's a huge door, that opens outward from left to right - not completely wide open, just enough to let out an impossibly glaring bright light and inside of which, inside the door, is where you are supposed to head.
Don't think about anything, what you want, who you want to see or meet or anything. Just go into the light.
And listen.
Talla and JES have a visualizer that goes along with this song which they posted onto Spotify and I'm trying to get them to stick it onto YouTube (because my PC gets stuck with Spotify!) - but their visualizer is basically pretty much what I have been talking about here except they have the colors upside down! Red at the top (very funny, guys). WATCH OUT FOR THE VOLUME ON THE TWITTER VERSION WITH THE VISUALIZER CLIP - very loud...!
Personal consciousness of self is divided into two things: one is a doorway through which most people never go.
The other is a system of the organic brain, that relies on brain cell memories of experiences perceived via signals from the material senses - which are held to then represent personal consciousness.
In this paradigm things go like so - "I was here back then, and I was here and here -, I am here now."
However even 'now' is a brain cell memory created at least 1/20th of a second earlier than the brain-aware statement of 'now.'
And this paradigm also dominates the whole of human society.
There is a reason the mainstream establishment including academia largely decries it or dismisses by feigning obliviousness about the discipline of psychology, and that is that all psychologists from Freud through Jung and Reich and anyone afterwards concluded that the world is dominated by the narcissistic psychopath mindset.
What this means in practice (this pathology) is that people seek material objects from which are derived materialsensory stimulus: a person is an object, a social group is an object, the products of high craft are objects...
All of modern economics and economic value is based on the practical exercise of money in exchange for objects of perceived benefit from the acquisition. There is a pill that cures pain/infection/diabetes/cancer; or purports to do that.
You take an object, you acquire an object, and then its possession procures for you the brain sensation of gain and betterment and even just simply sensation for its own sake alone - as in anti-anxiety medications and beta-blockers and 'serotonin stuff.'
If you take melatonin, then it will allow you to spend more time during the wrong hours, working to acquire material objects - instead of sleeping or resting during those phases that naturally the human body requires in to be authentically productive.
This mindset is completely sophisticated, very wide-ranged, totally superficial, socially overwhelming, utterly pernicious - and completely misleading.
What you are looking at are people insistent on getting brain cell memory experiences from instant sensory signals from their perceptions of material objects - all the while literally advancing inexorably towards their own complete physical and actual deaths, in the bodily, in the material sense; without giving a second thought to the effects of natural aging and the incapacity of their thinking mind to plan and strategize away from anything that is not purely instant or relatively immediate gratification of a nervous response.
'My under-eyes are puffy.' Says the person with a massive gut overhang and no rotational movement in their lower torso where their kidneys are... The kidneys being organs without any muscles to force them to move to do the work they necessarily have to do to flush fluids - and so the person seeks a pill to do what exercise is the only means of doing. They cannot imagine doing any actual real work; they can instead only insist on 'going to work' in order to have the economic means to acquire objects, and sensory stimulation from objects.
A person is also an object (in this paradigm). And so, the whole of society has set up this grandiose arrangement, in which people go around observing how others react and what they respond to, and then they portray those triggers in order to acquire (as possessed objects, in essence) the reactions of those people they have targeted.
Governments do it, Big Pharma does it, advertising agencies do it, the medical fraternity does it, 'romantic partners' do it - and in our modern times they have all learned to do it exceedingly well.
But there is a philosophical 'mind-trap' involved with all of this, a metaphysical reason why society went this way at all to begin with: personal consciousness of self is the only thing in the Universe that scientists cannot observe as a first order matter with a third party observer control.
Something new(ish)...
That is, you and you alone are having the sense of, the feeling of, 'personal consciousness' (of self; if you need to add that).
No one, no 'scientist' can honestly say that they are truly 'observing' or feeling what you are exactly feeling.
So it's easy for fools to turn around and pretend 'well okay, your personal consciousness of self does not exist' (and therefore I can manipulate you, and have no actual empathy with you; only a fabricated, a reflected portrayal of what can be passed of for empathy).
Scientists cannot measure it, so it's convenient for them to act like it does not exist, or at least, does not need to exist in a healthy human society.
...And which is the reason all psychologists say that there is no sane and mentally-healthy society in existence today.
And naturally then, the reason also why the rest of academia hates psychology in its purest form.
There is no obvious 'scientific' proforma for anyone literally and actually 'getting inside the heads' of another individual that is not themselves.
Human empathy, in the modern world, is hypothetical. And not real. Not genuine at all.
So what does the converse of this picture look like?
One of the problems for me discussing this in any way openly, to a 'general public' audience, is the sheer paucity to begin with, the poverty, of those tools that should be available to advanced intelligent people - and are not, in the framework of the modern human race.
The leading current neurophysiologist and computational neuroscientist (notice how he does not say 'psychologist!') Christof Koch when attempting to explain consciousness, goes off on this wild goose chase, misleading everyone about how the optic nerve is not the actual 'place' where sight and vision take place, and talks about the energy of the stimuli and the electrical energy in the nerve pathways and so on.
Koch wants to imply that vision is somehow key to consciousness. Which it is not.
But the authentic fact is though, that the whole of modern human society has been skewed off into this lunatic fantasy mentality of material stimulus by acquisition - because they have all put a price on sensation and sensory entertainment.
Look, look - frankly it's just entertaining for 'you' to go to your doctor and get 'prescribed' some nonsense in the form of a chemical or substance that will give your biological system a process interruption, disruption, modification, or even do nothing at all organic - whereas it is very hard work indeed, to throw in your job, run twenty miles every day (and/or night), suffer the psychological pressure of the disdain of your 'friends' and the continuous marketing pressure by governments to have you one of the 'fully employed...'
Which is - 'employed for them,' of course.
Oh I certainly can get in behind your eyes and see what you are seeing and feel what you are feeling.
And but then I might detest how you deal with what you are seeing and sensing...
And I might then choose to go behind the eyes of those I have a higher regard for.
But what does that mean 'have a higher regard for' (that is, meaning how they think, and not of course what they think)?
I do not want to necessarily go into your head!
But well why do I respect that person? Or this person, this certain individual, as opposed to any other one or lots thereof (of human beings)?
And so we go back to this thing about 'do unto others as you would have them do unto you' - but that categorically takes us away from 'do unto others what will make them act in a certain way towards you...'
But then isn't that what the whole world is doing at the moment? Causing fear and panic to make people jump in certain ways, inciting anger and emotional responses to issues requiring cold strategic thinking, inflaming basic sexual responses to convince audiences of highly commercialized 'sex positivity?'
Where are the empathy equations?
These are few and far to be seen.
Personal consciousness of self is the only thing in the Universe that cannot be observed by a third party as a scientist observes a germ in a test-tube to identify and know and understand everything about that germ, every mechanism of the germ.
Except it isn't.
Except Christof Koch is not the person that will ever find that out.
He has a completely arrogant and opinionated view that is endemic to all modern scientists
He cannot find it out.
Everyone knows what they're doing... Okay correction - someone there in each place knows.
He simply cannot understand that what he is only speculating about the energy running through the nerves linking the optic system in the human - is in fact testament to his ignorance about nervous energy and neurons; not testament to his science and science knowledge.
It's testament to his ignorance of science, all dressed up in peer esteem as therefore serious knowledge.
There are many completely precise and accurate objective external tests of the sense perceptions and feelings of an individual, as opposed to speculative opinions (as Koch gives) about what so-and-so is feeling.
And the fact that there is (or are) discounts totally his theory that people cannot know what another person's personal consciousness of self is... So why did he ever even propound such a fatally flawed position?
And the fact that there is or are... ...can extend forward as a trajectory of reasoning, to the idea that consciousness is fundamental; namely, it's an actual thing.
Are you an actual thing? That is, one separate, individual, thing?
You know numbers are things, and each of them is composed of sets of the same exact 'unit thing' but different by ascending arithmetic proceeding to the order of 'one added (same) thing' each time in the linear arithmetic sequence to Infinity.
So could I exchange with you, on the assumption that you have some 'things' of which I also already possess some of those things too - some 'thing spaces' in your mind?
I mean if you and I had the same, or more or less the same, number of 'thing spaces' but a different number of filled thing spaces, then maybe I could spare some, or you could spare some - especially if we both had some redundant sets. Or maybe even there were some sets that would benefit me to have, and benefit you to have less of. And vice versa.
Oh but my friends, human beings are nothing if not extraordinarily complex creatures.
So why make things hard on yourself?
Why go for just anything when you could work on something (I mean someone) truly personally opulent.
Actually let's go another way to make the point. Why are you wasting your time doing anything less??
At least be the person who could, who would, who can.
Men die. Mankind is grown only to burn, to be burned -, to ashes and to dust blown away in the wind.
One of the 'problems' or at least let's just say 'issues' with the latest pronouncements by officialdom that the US Navy recorded some objects of various tracking devices and systems, is that nowhere does anyone explain exactly what was different about these new pieces of technology that allowed them all to start capturing many UAP's all over the place - and which they still are doing; same as the China Beijing government is also doing since it has the same equipment.
Well look it goes like this: The Russians have way the most advanced radar and combination sensor technologies in the world and they term the way these are used for military purposes as 'net-centric' by which they mean any effective military 'field of operations' whether for defense or attack, is a net formed by the active electronics systems linking all the materiel components together in a dynamic cross-talking network. In this way multiple means of 'seeing' some enemy are formed up by ultra high-speed computing into one single screen monitor 'signal' available to the pilot or to ground and sea weapons.
Because 'stealth' technology dating back half a dozen decades now caused the disruption of incoming signals plus the temporal 'scattering' or phase-shifting of actual sensor data - the technology was structured then to try and unpick the electronically and otherwise artificially phase-shifted signals by searching in specific periodic cycles (micro-seconds).
Your brain gathers only the visual data available around 50 milliseconds cycles - that is, you 'see' static optical information every 1/20th of a second, and then has your mind pretend it is seeing everything smoothly as 'motion.'
Anything which is existentially materially actually there in cycle gaps of smaller than 1/20th of a second, well you just don't see it.
So what does material existence even actually mean??
Is a thing 'there' or is it not there during the moments (in regular discrete cycles) you don't gather any optical data?
Are there things actually physically there but you don't ever see them because your brain is not functioning fast enough - even though it naturally can do, although by organic nature does not do -?
Because you are assuming (as well as most people do) all material things have constant continuous spatial presence, and therefore existence. Whereas for sure you can project electrons as radio fields in exact precise phases (temporal cycles) and 'they' are not actually 'there' even for the percentage majority of the steady flow of time...
This kind of thing is a material hologram with form and substance.
It is nothing to have 'you' removed out of your organic mortal body and project you all over the place.
'Heels and Horsepower' - Houston private exclusive club for women who own expensive sports cars...
Right now you are trapped within an organic framework with a specific frequency-locked phase shift of perceived material existence and in that way also 'consciousness.'
The truly huge scale of mass human destruction events like Sodom and Gomorrah and Hiroshima/Nagasaki fits into the order of 'hundred/hundreds of thousands' only.
But the idea that killing people (that is to say human people) in the order of magnitude of 'great numbers' somehow automatically means that those left behind alive would change how they thought - is foolish reasoning.
You will have noted, as an adult of some life experience, that most people are dominated by their own pre-existing beliefs and almost totally by a view that they are themselves the ultimate arbiter of all truth and completely know better than you or me or anyone else including 'God' what truth is all the time. It would only ever be because someone lied to them, or gave them incomplete information, or something external like that - that caused them to ever make any mistakes and actually, they never make mistakes.
So. Killing people would not alter that total commitment to their own perfect capability of judgement.
This is not, however, the teaching of one 'Jesus Christ of Nazareth.' He taught that only those who were 'poor in spirit' (IE who realized they had little or nothing within themselves alone, to rely on to make absolute judgments) would possess the 'kingdom of heaven.'
So how would some super-advanced intelligent species approach the problem of getting human beings to accept and to realize that they were basically and fundamentally dumb?
And requiring external engagement with something vastly superior, in order to justify that they were 'intelligent' creatures in the accurate sense?
Haliene stuck this pic up on her FB page to coincide with the Congress testimony about us... Er, sorry, I mean them, about them. ...Some people think it's marketing of course.
Leaping to some damn stupid conclusion that AI is somehow this instance of a 'vastly superior' intelligence is exactly the kind of ridiculous and arrogant if not even completely lunatic position that one expects from humans all the time.
If I can manifest, say, one small 'miracle' by an authentic and legitimate physics means that is empirically true (always repeatable) - then the scales of things need only be whatever was framed by whoever could control those necessary physics mechanisms and processes (logic and systems): you could effect millions and billions instead of just kill a hundred thousand.
And this does not say or imply that 'effect' means completely change or alter them from their lunatic attitudes and prejudices to something higher and better; especially not something so functionally higher and better that they can 'enter some unearthly domain!'
But what you can do is turn the tables on all the idiots walking this planet and running the place - and show them the power and where they all get off.
And if you think nothing is going to happen soon, or that killing thousands (or even anyone at all) is the way to impress these idiots well just get that out of your mind.
You can't really 'impress' these clowns. They are clowns - painted-faced pretenders.
Things are going to happen very soon that will blow your mind; that is if you have a mind!
So how you can tell the difference between marketing, or the government running some game on its citizens to take their eyes and minds off the ball - and persons and things that are here also masquerading but not in any clownish way?
How can you tell an old school Rolls Royce or Aston Martin from a piece of industrialized junk pretending to be high quality and then being 'sold' to you for extravagantly expensive prices?
Evelyn & Crabtree's latest set...
Well, because real quality is palpable. Whether it comes at 50 milliseconds cycles or at only 1/12th of a second intervals, or at some vastly higher speed, the functional effects and quality is real and genuine; sensed, felt, and used for its value.
Hidden in plain sight is a well-known aphorism.
And sometimes you get so close to a thing you take it for granted that it should be there and that just anyone can make it happen like you're experiencing it...
LOL
Know what I mean?
Nudge nudge, wink wink - say no mo'ah.
The rest of that old advert about the 'Nudge chocolate bar' - also an English thing like Evelyn & Crabtree - went: 'Do you know Plato?' '...Knew 'is wife.' Nudge nudge, wink wink, say no more. (Was pronounced 'mo'ah' when Eric Idle delivered those lines).
