The Unconscious Versus McFreedom of McSpeech

Thanks to 'Rasputin' for that. (A guy's handle on a private investment forum that some of you here know well).

So if you go 'Google-Search' the collective unconscious according to Jung you instantly get a definition from Britannica claiming the Jung said it was a form of the unconscious - in brackets next then [that part of the mind containing memories and impulses of which the individual is not aware] - common to mankind as a whole and originating in the inherited structure of the brain.

Now that's just about as far away from what Jung actually said in his fairly precise English and his very precise German as well, as the cow is to the moon.

You look at it from the perspective of a grasshopper and you could think the cow did jump over the moon though. 

He definitely never said 'only containing memories and impulses.' God, and impulses - I don't think so!

Come inside. It's warm in here.

See the thing is with these diabolically slippery words in the hands of a toxic criminal class of supercilious so-called 'elites' who want to control everything especially you and your life, is they are excellent at spinning words and dissembling.

Stephen Fry is a great example. He will sit there, wiggling about, tapping his ankles as if everything is real jocular and he will take this utterly self-appointed position as knowing more than anyone else, and tell you, that the French woman in some Flaubert novel, is 'looking up in awe at the colors and the grandeur...' of the cathedral or whatever.

And he even has the hide to continue on and say things like: 'In her simplicity, she appreciates...'

...Whatever it is he is pretending she is 'appreciating.'

And then the idiot interviewer, who claims to be a physicist, nods and adds that someone else said they 'did not enjoy the rainbow any less because they now know how it works' (or how it is made).

Oh you actually know, do you, how the rainbow is made?

Okay so you tell me where the energy went after the violet band then.

Carl Jung never said anything like that. But what he did say is sufficiently verbally like it that Britannica and whoever is continuously pushing this Karl Popper-style line can easily get away with saying what they have said, because the new kids will never 'get it;' get how deceptive and tangentially these people's words depart from the meaning of anything Jung ever did say.

For a start Jung never did say 'brain structure' and he did not say 'inherited' pure and simple  -like you would take that to mean 'from the DNA!'

Or only from the DNA.

You need to be warm, kids,
it's going to get cold soon.

What he actually said was we do not know what the unconscious is at all!

Not - we are not attentive to it in our conscious states, or 'unaware' - he said and he meant 'really not knowing about it at all!'

He said we can observe, maybe, if we look really hard, some signs and that these are the same things across all cultures and hence it is a collective thing (IE the collective unconscious).

The surreptitious, and quite deliberate reason people like Fry put out this 'positioning' of themselves intellectually above you - unless you agreed with them and even then, you will find it is not all that simple either(!) (...They won't let you do it) - is that it deprecates then, the observer reliability.

And that is actually not a prima facie fact.

But once someone has uncritically just accepted it that it is a prima facie fact, then it's easy to hit them over the head because the wool has already been pulled over their eyes.

Except the observer could be both honest and reliable. Certainly they have no obvious hidden agenda, whereas if you have the board of editors at the Oxford University Press behind you and all of the press and media pumping that is going on, there most certainly is a hidden agenda and a very strong one. It's about research grant funding attracting, it's about political power, and it's about controlling the field of ideas.

There is no 'freedom' of 'speech;' there is McFreedom of McSpeech which is a generic label for in this case the particular brand of OxCam Freemasonic propaganda which is a literal one-way flow, in a drive-by take-out for ideas and 'philosophy.' They vend, you suck in, and you also pay and you pay dearly. 

Stephen Fry will tell you if you asked him, and he will tell you floridly and rapidly, that he does not see God, nor any evidence of God and even were God to exist then God has to answer for His Theodicy.

Yeah, I know. You vegetarians
don't want to eat this!
Bill and I will have it.
Heck, there's not even that much to
go around on that plate! 

And then...

Wait for it.

Wait for it.

Can you imagine what is going to be said here now - next?

What? What do you suppose?

Imagine me as the interviewer though, right...

Just imagine it.

"Hey Steph. You're familiar with Genesis, aren't you?"

Fry rolls eyes. He's thinking: (What does this low-life intellect think he is going to 'challenge' me with?! Humph. Scoff. Snort).

"That snake guy, he was the most intelligent, maybe even the most intellectual, certainly the smartest, cleverest and most self-important arrogant slimy bastard around, right?"

Fry: 'Huh? So what?'

"Well did he see God then too after he got tossed out of G-of-E, or like you was he not ever able to see God either..."

But see, the cunning lowness of people like Fry, is even in saying that above there that I said -, it does not diminish the possibility that those who 'see God' are just simply wrong, because after all he's already positioned them as stupid. ...Unable to tell the difference between 'dream' or imagination, or wish-fulfillment - and reality.

Susana.
DJ and prominent Euro
trance singer - sings in
multiple languages.
We're backing Susana
around here now.
She sings the trance song below.

But what I said was that super super-duper advanced intelligent (EG ET Alien) beings, come here, can do so, do do so, materially and physically, not 'metaphorically,' but that they do it under the blanket of either other events which take precedence in the attendant minds of humans generally, or in places that they are not being watched.

Carl Jung said that as our scientific measuring equipment got better, it may be possible soon (meaning, after the time when he was making those statements), to observe more and better things relating to the unconscious.

He did not ever actually distinguish - as two different, entirely separate things - between someone's individual unconscious, and the human collective unconscious. All he said was that the personal ego was one clear 'thing,' the personal 'self' was another thing that encompassed the 'ego' and that the personal unconscious was the unconscious whatever that was, especially necessarily including the collective unconscious, interacting specifically to the personal self.

But I will certainly distinguish between people like Stephen Fry or Sir Salman Rushdie, and say, you, and very definitely 'the collective unconscious.'

Stephen Fry is not attached in any way whatsoever, to the human collective unconscious. He is a different creature altogether.

The genius of real scientific thinkers like Stuart Hameroff, is that they can perceive down into the mysterious, previously unseen bits and pieces of things, and, by applying good quality thinking and also adopting these new physical tools that Jung foresaw - they are starting to come to terms with what the unconscious might be.

They already know very clearly, that consciousness is operating on one frame of reference of its over all activity, easily at the quantum level.

And so we can start to authentically envisage the real logic of actual 'collective' connectedness...

But that then asks a question about my assertion that people like Stephen Fry are not 'here' with the rest of us; that they are not connected. So well then where are they, in fact? Where does their consciousness tie in to, if it ties into anything at all. They have a consciousness, it would appear, but they deny 'God' so they are not consciously at least tied to that...

But see hey, why are they so intent on saying 'God does not exist?'

Aaaah. Just relax you 
vegetarians.
Drink your tea.

Because what flows from the scientific understandings and knowledge of leading-edge mechanistic scientists (and I am a mechanist, when it comes to 'Cosmology'), is that at minimum, the entirety of the connected-up human race, albeit 'unconscious' must be a kind of a 'god' - if you consider that it, the human species, will go on and on into the future, maybe even to Eternity. 

Ah now but if someone truncated that 'eternal unfolding...'

In religious thinking 'the Devil' aka Satan, wants to do that.

And already Imperial College is going to establish an entirely 'from a tabula rasa;' an inceptive new 'being' that has AI 'consciousness...

So you've already been shoved to one side, my good friend.

And secondly, Fry has no 'connection interest' with the simpleton woman who 'looked up at awe' - meaning you. He means you - you're the simpleton, the simple-minded fool. Make no mistake about it.

And see you can't really connect to him either, because you will never be as smart as he is. That's what arrogance says, see. He might not say it to you so openly, but it's what every single word and action of his whole being tells you actually!

Now, you have to make up your mind about something though. The human collective conscious knows everything. Jimi Hendrix said so: 'Just ask the Axis, He knows everything.'

And it also has supreme power to do anything and everything, that it, sorry - that you, want.

And you have to hurry up now, and decide whether you are going make any moves right now.

That Austrian medical doctor who was also a psychologist, whose name must not be McMentioned - well he said that all politicians, were unable to be sexually satisfied. And he gave really good reasons for saying it. Uh-oh. LOL

 

A Staggering New Fact

The topical Salman Rushdie said in an interview, the following - he said, and I quote: 'I mean, I do not believe in the literal truth of fairy tales, for example. I do not believe, for instance, that magic carpets fly.'

When the early Persian myth writers said that the Deev captured Peris every now and then, and kept them captive in iron cages at the ends of the highest branches of tall trees, exposed for everyone to view them and exposed to the elements - and that Peri helpers would fly up to those cages and feed the captive Peri fragrances, which is what their fundamental sustenance consisted of, was this true or only metaphorically true? ...Until some human hero would arrive and was recruited to rescue and release the captive fairy being?

The label of 'Prince' in those days also meant a broadly powerful, maybe even a roaming, ruler, but not the absolute ruler.

...This is where I come from.
Up there, beyond that mist line.
There's giants up there, you know.

So when you read in the New Testament, for instance, that 'Satan is the Prince of the Air,' it does not mean he is a Peri - he is not of the kind of being called 'Peris.' And it does not mean that he rules the Air at all! It means he is a traversing, meaning 'uncrowned' but still dominating, power. Albeit for our purposes we are going to say, also an actual real person/being. Not just a 'power.'

I posted previously that I was going to specify which bits of anything that I had written in other places, were absolutely true and correct in all details and materially factual... Meaning, hard matter-type, fact. Not 'metaphysical' fact.

Rushdie next goes on to explain that he still 'believes' in the 'truth' of the metaphysical lessons or teachings.

And that is exactly not what I am going to say.

In this case, let's equate 'magic flying carpets' with 'UAP's/UFO's.'

Everything I wrote about Thomas C. Schelling, Dr Munro Leaf, Lincoln Gordon (CIA) was completely true. Well in fact all those gentlemen were CIA in one way shape or form. Leaf was a top academic in sociology and political science. He was a major government adviser and adviser to the Disney Corporation. The Rand Corporation, Eastman-Kodak High Altitude Photographic Laboratories - all of those groups, everything I wrote about them in context of those gentlemen was also completely true. And they worked for all of them in different roles.

And this means that somewhere, maybe deep in a government archive somewhere, are government files detailing all of those things about which I wrote concerning those people and the secret or covert government programs that they were working on and in.

Now today, the media talks about 'compartmentalized' classified files, but I cannot see how anything dating to way back then in the late-Fifties, early-Sixties needs to be 'compartmentalized' because you would not 'suppose' there are still any on-going projects or programs, related to those things back then.

Except... I can think of one and it is not anything to do with ET Aliens and UFO's.

I'm not going to say what it is, because it doesn't affect what we want to talk about for right here and now.

And that is specifically, that I have not ever been talking about 'metaphorical' UFO's or metaphorical advanced beings from somewhere else - I have not been talking about Rushdie myth 'magical flying carpets' but about real ones.

So I am not really all that interested the way KP has been characterizing things to do with Dr Steven Greer and all of those groups of UFO chasers, as 'dreams.'

I'm a reasonable guy.

I am going to explain here why people such as Rushdie are intent on hammering away at metaphors when someone else raises the matter of 'flying carpet'-type thing.

Rushdie sees only the metaphorical representation, in the same way that the Deev of Persian folklore, imagined that the top end of tall trees is more or less the region where Peris live and so, keeping them 'up' there would prolong their lives...

Sir Salman would like even less what I am going to say next about him.

Which is that he lacks a range of capacities inside his own structure, which places him more or less on the same standing as the Deev. Deev, have only neural energy which goes up to but not beyond the harmonic multiples of, maybe 550 nms.

At around that type of range of wavelength, there is a 'reflective' mechanism of the Gauss Curve of shortening wavelengths (as we talked about many times earlier, this is just below the so-called 'ultra violet catastrophe' section of the curve). So that all that the intelligent neurological processing is able to do beyond that is 'see' (perceive) the reflections downwards of what lies above and beyond.

So naturally, he says - and he is telling the truth about what he perceives, and he is being self-honest - that everything that we 'think' about beyond that range of existence is only a thing representing some other thing. That's the only way he can think about it.

In fact though - yes what he sees does represent some other thing; a reflection of that thing, not a metaphor for some other thing.

Steven Greer's assertions that there is some exclusively private layer of private corporate involvement, outside of government, but linked with government in the matter of ET Aliens and craft and materials and technology, does fit in somewhat, with what I was saying about those private companies and 'think tanks' of academics post-War (WWII). It's more than possible.

It's strongly possible.

I'm a reasonable guy, yes, 
but man I could still waste a lot of money!
Don't you worry about that!

The split in official policy and thinking at the highest levels, comes about through the difference, the structural difference in neurology between people like, say Dr Munro Leaf, and Sir Salman Rushdie in modern times.

If even an army officer or a soldier comes to a secret panel and tells them 'yes I saw such-and-such' the 'Rushdie's' on that panel will automatically default to the 'and that was a dream/a metaphor/a psychic phenomenon coming from the stress of the risks of nuclear conflagration...'

And so from then on actual policy is determined, governed, not by the actual facts as reported and ascertained - and which might have been able to have been fully validated - but by the 'metaphorical lessons' or the 'moral values' dimension as perceived by people with a defective neurology.

You see, these 'little bluish-grey guys' are not the actual ET Aliens as they live elsewhere. These are functionaries who are alternated backwards and forwards from their real physiology, to a physiology that is suited to being 'perched' like a space bird, not very far out in space from us in order to perform their tasks. Their ears pick up higher-frequency sounds because those are the ones that travel best in low atmosphere and low natural gravity conditions (which affects the atmosphere gases and gas and particulate dynamics), their eyes see better in the relative dark, their fingers can magnetically cling onto surfaces where there is molecular density, their bones can survive Earth atmospheric super high G-forces, and extreme rapid medium changes.

Actual real ET Aliens from very distant places look virtually just like you or me.

You would generally speaking not be able to tell one apart from any other human being down here.

What the hell, JES!
You post these pics, what do you
expect me to do with them!!
And stop 'skiting.' You and me both
are not the ages
they all think...

Imagine though, if a team of serious-minded, senior academics, were canvassing in front of President Kennedy, the need to look at human beings and assess them with regard to what range of neurological wavelengths they actually possessed the structural capacity to use...

I mean there's plenty of ways of using meters - electronics devices - even available way back then in the very early-Sixties, to 'see' these things on a scope. Tavistock was using them.

They're still using them but they just got into a world of trouble experimenting on little kids just then though. Those experiments are not totally wrong - you can definitely reverse chemically-induced organic changes with electronics; not other chemicals. It's just that Tavistock does not have that kind of electronics just yet. But they will though, sooner or later.

You could check Hoover and declare him defective. Johnson - defective. Any number of people.

And what would be the 'benefit' of those human beings with a much greater range of neural wavelength traffic and traffic capability?

Well you can touch an electric heating bar and burn your fingers. But can you touch a high ultra-violet data stream? Can you hear it with your ears?

Can I stick you, you personally, in front of a xenon gas discharge tube and turn it on and after a few minutes will you be able to read electromagnetic signalling through brick walls? Some of you will, some of you won't.

That doesn't necessarily mean you are 'deficient' but it probably does though! Because for all of your life, maybe your lives if you believe that kind of thing, all that you have ever jammed into your head was the 'reflection only' of matter sensitivity above the green codes.

Someone would have to take you away from your bullshit that you are 'smart' and that you are 'scientific' because for one thing - you just ain't!

To take you into a material physical craft that accommodates all of the ranges of neural wavelengths, well that is a thing that your radar can 'see' very easily.

Maybe you could do that, where, oh I don't know, ten thousand people were being pushed around in a massive earthquake and so it would be a waste of time telling anyone 'Hey I just saw a space ship!' Pull yourself together man. You're imagining things because of the earthquake. Or 'stop being stupid. Don't you know it's a crisis right now? You're hallucinating. You're panicking.' They'd tell you.

If I ran an ad, though, say in the Auckland or Christchurch Times, asking how many people saw space ships a few hundred feet above the ground during that massive set in 2011 - what sort of response do you think I would get?

We're just going to have
to take her to dinner, Bill.
At your old house.
(Thanks for this pic, btw).

?? 

Anyone? Anyone?

LOL

I already know what the answer is. No point 'Vera' circularizing that in CIA because that would then 'potentially' mean Vera gets to stay and goes even higher, and her bosses get kicked out - that's if anyone even smart in the White House 'gets the point.' And then they - her erstwhile bosses - all have to come see me and Bill and goddammit maybe even KP at that point - and sit in lectures every week until we 'manually' fix up their missing bits.

Well you try telling that kind of thing to Mr Salman Rushdie! Sir - Sir, Salman Rushdie, hero of free speech and atheism and science and truth and reality.

And if you think 'someone' cannot make massive rainstorms and floods and earthquakes at will, then you got another thing coming!

LOL 

Listen, it ain't 'metaphorical magic flying carpets' going up and down into phreatic pipes during volcanic eruptions and causing volcanic lighting and ionic storms, thereby affecting the weather somewhere else. 

As Suzie Quatro as 'Rio Rogers' said once in a Bob the Builder kids' video:

'That ain't fake singing, pardner, that's real singin'!'

Kick your ass you'll know about it. 'Someone,' if 'someone' does that.

I dunno... Is it time Morgiana, is it time?

Jesus.
Just, honestly...
Just Jeezus.
...It's kind of interesting though.

It is getting very close to time.

But why, why did 'God' make Sir Salman with a neurology which does not extend past his reflection filters level.

Well hey hey hey, hang on just a minute though. There's nothing wrong with just being stuck in that zone for a while. The world still has the need for ditch-diggers too, ya know!

And besides, what makes it that he has to go grab some Peris and close them up in iron cages and suspend them on the highest branches of the tallest trees? That's something he did all by himself.

He is fundamentally evil at heart.

Nobody asked him to damage or 'shake' people's 'faith' such that they were in danger of 'losing their faith.' Just because you hurt a fairy or even kill a fairy does not mean you have proven anything other than that you are an extremely heartless individual. Except they are not just 'individuals' - there's a whole bunch of them.

An ascendant line of species development, still also has to contend with competing descending lines though, sometimes. Not everywhere in the Cosmos but it is so here. This is a sequestered place.

It's like a share farmer in an adjoining field. He knows his crops are screwed because the land he's on is no good, but he throws a bunch of his seeds over to your place. Now don't forget - every single cultural outcome, every slightest nuance of innovation emerging from the field of the 'Evolution' of any particular species, is preserved and protected... ...maybe by the little bluish-grey people. Maybe. DNA is unfolded, iterative magic.

Because as Carl Jung did say, it's all a combination, of genetic start-up plus the 'social incidence.' It's not exclusively one thing or just the other thing alone - it's both things unfolding together, which then results in a Beethoven or a Mozart.

And by the way, what makes it that the next-door share farmer is not stealing all your Beethovens, and keeping them 'preserved' somewhere just for himself? He's a long way ahead of you in this matter. Because for one thing he was not 'you' in the first place. He is your enemy in every sense.

You are a new thing. He is an old thing. 

You don't even know how to use your UV ranges (yet). And he, doesn't have those...

Am I wrong, Tiger? Even just a little bit?

Here's the clue:

The Idea Of Brain-Mapping

I suppose, 'theoretically' (which is, from my point of view, the thing that is really going on with human science on the subject; just theories) - brain-mapping is the way to look at what might be different between a truly advanced Alien species and human people on Earth.

Brain-mapping is something which is done all the time now. And it is much more commonly being used to construct or analyse AI systems, than it is anymore to look at the human organism.

Fundamentally, so much has been assumed to have been already 'discovered' in terms of psychiatry, and even the neuro-transmitters at the level of molecular chemistry, that the human front is not really considered all that 'hot' compared to AI brains. Even scientists know they are just paying lip-service to grant funding motivations when they use phrases like 'only scratching the surface;' they don't really believe that at all. They think they have a pretty good grasp of how the human brain is structured and how it thinks.

Another one I just love the photo 
composition of.

It's only when their narcissistic psychopathy gets the better of them, will they openly say such things as what Anthony Fauci just said when he claimed that more kids are wanting to enroll in medical studies because of 'the Fauci Effect.' Namely, they will say such self-involved and arrogant stupid things all the time. 

So it's going to be complex well beyond any chance here in this fairly simplistic venue to try and seriously examine what 'might' be the difference between how advanced ET Aliens think and how humans are assumed to think...

I have turned this over in my own head all day today and the best thing that I can say is something pretty silly too, on the surface of things: I want to tell you about a common observation by the people who say they have been 'abducted.' And that is that ET Aliens have skin and hair that can glow according to, apparently, the ways they are feeling and the things they are thinking.

Now this is of course very silly and something coming from who-knows-where, right? 

Probably they have all heard the story beforehand somewhere and are simply repeating it to sound as if they really have been abducted by Aliens and making it appear that their accounts are being consistent with some presumed narrative, some truthful narrative.

See, we can do 'healthy food' pics
for people too...
Actually, this is a reminder about the
UV catastrophe in the Gauss 'trajectory.'
You push someone's 'energy'
through that zone and things fall apart
inside.
Sure, you have to know how, though!
Just because something is cyanose
doesn't mean it's toxic.

However. If we leave that to one side, and look at the 'mind-mapping' implications we are left to wonder about the bizarre and complex, and very twisted processes these creatures must have to engage in, if they wanted to lie - which is something humans naturally do and they do it all the time of course.

So if we implicate ET Aliens in the same kinds of deceitful ways that we all get up to, then of course, it does mean these creatures must have to have developed some pretty sophisticated mind tools in order to be able to trick each other; which is what we do and what we, evidently, want to do to each other all the time, presumably, for advantage of some sort.

Believe me, if I had any of you in a lecture theater, and we could kick around some ideas robustly, then you would suddenly be left as to no doubt at all though - that ET Aliens do not think like humans do.

You see, to put it as crudely, but as meaningfully though, as I am able to within the confines of this platform, an electronics circuit cannot hide how it is functioning from a trained technician.

Electricity goes in here, it waits there, it is leveled-up through mathematical wave-form manipulation there, it goes into this gate here, it goes across some transducer, some actuator maybe - and it comes out there as a kinetic effect...

And so on.

You can't really disguise too much in the way of circuit altering.

You bolt on another part and there it is! It's not invisible.

Humans, on the other hand, are left with 'skin resistance' measuring by FBI agents(!), or Mandy Bombard to tell you about body language.

ET Aliens can also see where you are actually getting your 'mind' energy from...

You don't know very much about that at all. Some psychologists talk about it, speculate about it, and the clinical psychiatrists all think they are 'woo woo' and nuts.

But you can't see it and you can't capture it and stick it in a laboratory test-tube.

So it doesn't exist, right.

You don't need alcohol.
Not right now.

Now, my friend KP... You yourself very much do know, that when an electronic circuit has shorted something out, it doesn't necessarily mean the whole thing will not work to some degree - especially if we are talking about complex modern circuitry with multiple redundancy paths.

What it means though, is that the wave-form of energy will definitely be changed in those parts where the electricity is still flowing - that is one of the standard testing techniques to find a faulty panel. In the old days, you looked at the oscilloscope reading on where you were sticking your probes.

Now 'shorted' means burnt out, dead, broken. And that will certainly imply that a clean power wave in the frequency you want or need, will not be available, to the bits where you want that to go...

My friend, the only reason you humans find 'switching' between two opposing forces - two opposing arguments, hypothetical positions, ideas and so on, so addictive and attractive - is because that clean energy wave you should be using is non-existent in your circuitry. You can only 'move forward' or so people assume, by using the energy trick of 'switching' to produce enough force to overcome inertia.

And not only that, such a clean energy wave would not do anything anyway because there are literally parts that are burnt out and don't work at all. They are closed, and they are dead. Also, they are rusted together, completely tightly shut.

Sometimes if we say something out in the public sphere, it is super dangerous, because then some malicious minds will grab that 'thing' and circumvent what we are doing. If they knew what we were actually doing, and how we did it, obviously they could dream up strategies to mess with it.

Using Millennial-speak, it is literally awesome to see for instance, how someone like Justin Trudeau lives, how he survives as an animated structure, a moving being.

You could cut his power supply off in an instant and he wouldn't even know.

You're with me?

It's about to start
'Spring Wildflower Season'
down here.

If it were told just exactly how you could do that -, then you know, trouble and problems.

But 'brain-mapping' is not different from 'circuit design.' If there are, let's say nodes, then those nodes have gates as well - presuming we are saying this is like a circuit design. So if someone alternates the logic gate from 'always positive information on' to 'always ignorance' (IE no flow value; IE it's 'neutral'), and another logic gate from 'always benevolence positive' to 'malice,' and the third logic gate at that strata from 'truth' to 'not facts' (inevitably this means direct lies, but perhaps also let's face it, well, humans... ...these will be designed to be pretty clever lies) - then it cannot be that a clean continuous power flow is happening (vis-a-vis we had a neutral spot at minimum).

So what energy is this person operating on? Where will they be getting it from? Where must they be getting it from?

Answer: other people.

Why, because other people's energy is just in packets anyway and is not a super-continuous flow.

The parasite system uses energy packets, because they are 'moving' by 'electronic circuit switching' anyway.

One time here we already talked about the 'ultra-violet' Gauss Curve and asked the question 'where did that projected trajectory energy actually go?

And that's quite enough that needs to be said before we all get into a lot of trouble. Maybe not just yet but maybe later though.

Believe me I can kill a professional football player taking the field and his ascending reticular neural system is all hyped up like Bruce Lee...

Through the indigo gate.

If you see what I mean. You can burn a vital human 'circuit' out a lot more simply than people know - they all think 'drugs' or knives or bullets.

No one would see a thing and you'd never be able to prove anything either.

Now what makes advanced ET Aliens generally-speaking, even in the case say, of an Adolf Hitler, not do such interventions here?

The answer is you and them are not commensurable, morally. You can be a deliberate liar and they cannot lie at all. So. It's actually you who have them at a kind of disadvantage, although it also places you firmly in the 'forever backwards' species category.

And they already know that. Which is another good reason why they don't just 'show up' here very obviously.

The main reason this 'answer' is not going to convince you though, is because, well, you are a human being and you have been raised to think deception is an option.

Thus, forever backwards.

Except, not forever, because the human race is walking into a mass extinction event of its own doing. Jung said that, not ET Aliens.

Which bit of 'not sufficiently possessed of truth, moral conscience, honesty, facts, or benevolence' do you want to argue about?

Someone comes here from 16 trillion miles away. That guy has maximum, 'all of these things above,' not minimum of, or any old percentage of, including absolutely none of at all.

LOL

Any arguments? We listen to them. It's what we do.

...Seems quite a sad song, this. Human thing of course. They can't see past their own condition and state of affairs.

This Is For Older People, Really...

Except of course, if I were even just fifteen I would have dived into it myself; prolly never would have come back out!

I mean what we have been talking about here recently.

To get the kind of perspective on any individual personal life though, in the ordinary run of affairs, it's probably not so advisable to invite younger people in it - into what is talked about around here.

And you will definitely see why in the lyrics of the music video down below.

Traditional old American-style
phosphate cherry soda.
Remember those days?

Previously I had actually forgotten to mention something - about the 'Elves' and making contact:

This business of placing some small pieces of silver, even just one piece of silver -, out in the bushes in the moonlight, well that is the very example of 'symbolon.'

This is a real token - if you're doing it with the spirit of seeking positive friendship with an advanced being - from the material world; something in your existential material life's world. It's something from there being 'set aside' for acceptance by the other world.

And it is the implicit meaning that is important.

We are surrounded today, by fabricated pressures, false 'imperatives,' false ideas of truth and wisdom, maliciously misleading propaganda about knowledge, information and education.

As I had been pointing out not more than just a few days ago, and well before Rushdie got attacked on an open stage - very vulnerable and exposed as he was in any case, given his situation - it was the American government itself that had literally burned TONS of books and banned the selling and reading of them... ...books by the Austrian medical doctor and psychologist whose name shall not be said. 

??

Free speech?

This is where, exactly?

I tell you what, I guarantee you that those books are far better written, regardless of how much of what they are saying you might agree with or not agree with, than the very weak and poorly-written 'Satanic Verses' by that mustahaqu allawm Rushdie.

Immediately upon his knifing, the Iranian government held celebrations and publicly said he was 'blameworthy!' LOL

Somehow this pic really does give me
the feeling of being back there at that time
and sort of place.
Not even sure why. Just does.

Meanwhile, the FBI was exactly where then?

Given that they actually did have a real enemy foreign government ready willing and clearly able to reach out into American society and 'hit' someone public. And they'd actually even warned so beforehand. You forget though, right?

When you start dealing in a different world though, a place where it is impossible to stab someone in the neck at all - well, maybe it is possible, but it would have no effect - and the objectives of life are radically different to those of this world, then there is more than just a certain incommensurable 'perspective' you will hold about the affairs of this Earthly world today.

And that makes things not so easy to proffer to the youth, but yet, they must have it, those ideas and ideals...!

We cannot, as a species afford any longer to give face to, or credit as 'sensible' the simply atrocious nonsense of the present 'leaders.' They are literally taking billions of years of development, I'll not say human 'Evolution,' to the brink of total annihilation. There is no question about it.

Deep in the gut of every single Muslim on the planet, is the emotional surge, the feeling, that says 'yes, gotcha Salman ya bastard.' And many of them will overtly say not though, and 'we support liberal values' and whatever.

Meanwhile, the ordinary non-Muslim has a feeling welling in his gut to the effect that 'oh you bastard, stabbing a person who was just talking.'

The values are deeply embedded and can provoke feelings, which are human psychological facts.

I love the lighting in the shot.

And then those facts exert forces and have tremendous energy, and by-and-by cause the self-destruction of the whole human race: that is the ultimate logical conclusion.

So what are those values?

They don't exist.

They are facades masquerading as values.

You don't really believe them at all.

So how do you have them?

Salman is allowed to speak but he whose name must not be mentioned cannot.

And why?

Is Salman more 'right' than the other guy?

The Iranian Shi'a mullahs are right but only in this case, because otherwise we Sunni Muslims hold that well, we could kill the rather innocent Ali off no problem and thereby have the false and wrong person be the Caliph, someone who was quite literally an armed usurper - and thus have to say the Shi'as are 'wrong.' Because after all, look at us, we dominant the world of Islam. You guys are wrong. Allah supports the winner, the 'righter.'

Right and wrong about what?

We Shi'as hold that well, look at us, we are bravely countering the evil Great Satan.

Meanwhile we Americans say that 'oh you can't do this, we are supporters of free speech...'

Oh, and we are advanced, of course.

And you are sitting at home, imagining that you really fit into all of this.

So do you? Really?

It's different, but also, sort of similar...

And the Elves come and plant a money-tree in your back yard.

And then next, what? What are you going to do now, because I tell you the helluva fight you will have on your hands!

You will not be able to sway the mentality of anyone around you. The first thing they will say is - 'give us agency, and also, hey, give us a money-tree too. So that we can be like you... ...and -.'

And behold lest the human reach out their hand and take from the Tree of Eternal Life, and live and be like one of us.

Because that's when you'll have the 'utter destruction of everything.'

What's changed since the 'G-of-E?'

This time what would it matter if you actually saw the serpent (again). If you saw God Himself. Human people's story is that 'trust us, trust us, we will THEN automatically change our tune because you have proved with sci-entific proof and evidence that y'all exist - you Fairies, Elves, ET Aliens, gods and demi-gods, and even G.O.D.'

The meaning of 'symbolon' is the token that brings the mindsets together. You have to change. There is no way around it. Look at all the people on Evangelical Christian YouTube channels, who evidently, going on the firmness and conviction with which they recount their stories - they have had 'NDE's and have been to 'Heaven' and so on. ...You tell them one time: 'There was no Moses, right? There was never any such person or any such thing that ever actually happened, and the Laws are taken from the Code of Hammurabi.'

Ay yay yay yay yay.

Symbolism.

And also, by the way, you need to become psychologically attractive to various 'un-Earthly otherworldly' beings, before you will be able to be let back inside the G-of-E where they are all hanging out.

No! No! Jesus saved us by dying, and sacrificing to atone (to someone; who?) for our sin! He was the 'sacrifice' because Moses... Uh-oh.

Yeah right because Moses Charlton Heston.

Meanwhile Jesus... ...yeah I know Jesus. You killed Him. No we didn't do that. Someone else did that.

Christopher Wray is Pilate. 'I went by the book. And then I let the JOOZ kill that guy they don't like.'

Why, Chris, but why? 

'Because well, Moses made rules and we have rules hell otherwise we would be lawless! And then there would be anarchy.'

...Why, Hadi (Matar), why did you stab Rushdie? Was it because he was a pathetic writer and was really over-rated?

'No. Because Muhammad said.'

But Hadi...

'Hey guys -,' turning to the ET Aliens. 'Can we just have the money-tree now? I get it now. So can I?'

'Okay Calvin no problem. But no coffee with that though, right.'

'No yes yes - I want coffee with it. We need coffee man, come on now.

'Oh and by the way, can you show me those big glass tubes again, you know, where you grow the people. I just want to see which people you have in this particular mother ship.'

Check out the lyrics. Not for young people. They need their sleep at night. The guy singing was 86 years old when he was filmed here in this - he's still around, looks the same, does the same shows. His use of sharps and flats in the lyrical melodic context is absolutely masterful beyond words. She is a great singer.

True Secrets Of The Elves

[We will be looking at the opposite to 'diabolos' in this piece.]

Unlike people of the past, most of them, at least - we must not be unintelligent and mindless about certain things.

Relations between the more advanced beings and human affairs and human beings, is potentially a two-way street, but not always so because of the fundamental condition of humans.

The modern style of Kubla Khan's
Stately Pleasure places.

The myth narratives say that it is possible for humans to become actually materially linked to Elves (among many of the otherworldly beings), but that what prevents most of these relationships from succeeding is impatience on behalf of the human, and also a lack of faith about what qualities Elves prize. The common understanding in any event, is that the lifespans of humans in the first place are far shorter than that of Elves - so that's a significant issue.

Secondly, humans consider themselves to be the more intelligent among the Universal species of intelligent life - and that is abundantly not true at all.

Nevertheless, Elves scan the human race and select various individuals at various times for their own reasons, and merely assist that individual 'subsist' in a way, so long as they are humanly alive and thus able to further whatever Earthly aim was the true objective of this one-way street relationship. It's probably not quite a 'one-way street,' but it will be one-sided; not equal.

The Mughal Emperor Aurangzeb (1618 - 1707) decreed many oppressive things to assert his claim of being the 'Universal Caliph' and also thus the leading proponent of the Shari'a.

Most historians believe that a copy of the Quran held in the library of Azamgarh, Nothern Uttar Pradesh, is at least in part hand-written by Aurangzeb himself. ...I am just noting this important fact here now, because later on (though not in this Blog piece), the whole subject of the magical and often occult 'manuscript culture' originating from Persia will become very meaningful to the diligent and the attentive.

One of the matters which concerned him (Aurangzeb) most of all was the playing of certain kinds of instruments. It has become folklore among modern Muslims that the Messenger of Allah forbade music and the playing of instruments save the drum. That is not correct - he specifically banned membranophones... (And likewise 'blowing' instruments which have reeds or make sound through vibrations of air). Membranophones are those instruments whatever they were, whether stringed or also skin-covered drums, but which induced the vibration of other membranes on the drum somewhere.

Aurangzeb explains why. He said that these instruments, in particular the sarangi and the dholak caused musical hallucinations.

If we shift now to a broader perspective about these things, and look at the psychological aspects of 'resonance' generally, we must observe that dreams for example, are a form of resonance inside the sleeping human brain, partly from things of the conscious day-light hours, and partly from things from the completely unconscious. Yet even if we actively 'interpret' those dreams using say Jungian dream interpretation techniques, all we are doing is having a passive stance to the thing in fact: the unconscious 'tells' us something, and we attempt to make sense of that. And that's it.

This is not actually, what we should be doing as intelligent and fully-aware individuals.

We should at least be confident enough of ourselves and our presupposed status as these 'super-intelligent beings' - to actively send messages up-front into the unconscious and indeed, to anywhere else that we conceive might exist even though are not able to see it with the vision of our ordinary eyes and neural-optical capacities.

The Quran is correct when it speaks of the 'Satanic Verses' being those times when the Shaytan cast into the mouth of the Messenger of Allah, certain words.

'Diabolos' is Greek and means to cast in order to cut in two. The key part is 'ballein' which means to cast like you would a spear.

The opposite of that is 'symbolon.'

This means to cast a token, but not just any 'token' but something which really connects and gathers together.

Everything looks better from some distance.

We need not be foolish, ignorant, and unthinking, about the facts and information that we can gain today.

When cultural depictions of Elves and Fairies show them wearing tiaras with jewels in the middle where the forehead is, this is a material reflection of the actuality - which is not about bits of crystal, rock, or stone. If the myth narratives say 'star' then that is what the situation really is. Now we are not so childish as to imagine that in the myth depiction case of 'star' it means another sun-like celestial object; that is ridiculous because it does not accommodate the necessary logical 'boundary conditions' between related things. An Elf is not so large as to be the size of several constellations. Despite the narratives all saying they can change size.

When silly foolish people want to say things about 'harmonic resonance' being a part of occult magic, and produce one or two little 'symbols' then they are flying in the face of all of what we, we relatively unintelligent little Earth creatures know, even about our own manufactured material structures, our architecture, our concepts about physics and crystalline forms.

The procedure for making contact with super-advanced, highly elevated beings, considerably more intelligent than us ourselves -, we must engage our minds, in our minds, in terms of very organised and complex shapes and formations...

Asparagus sauce, morels, and poached
fish. ...We misunderstand the word 'symbol!'

I was torn between not showing this short video clip, since it is in fact incomplete and abruptly cuts off - however it is a clip of the actual recent-era master of the sarangi instrument, whose rendition of this famous piece is the most famous one; the thing banned by Aurangzeb, alongside the Dholak which was widely regarded as taboo not simply because of the Islamic religious ban, but because it has erotic connotations (in the cultural narrative) and erotic powers.

Aurangzeb well might have said 'musical hallucination' and I am saying something a little bit different to that. ...I am saying 'symbolon' in the true Greek meaning.

If you cast a connective token into the astral realms, you will be taking the initiative, and that is the right thing. 

What actually causes the resonance here (and it is a resonance inside of you), is the musical effect of the 'pull-off' from the strings, the after-effect dropping-off sound (which can have started like a shot from a gun though, hitting an acoustic peak), and like certain Chinese Kung Fu techniques, it is the outside of the fingernails that are interacting with the already vibrating strings - because like in some KF techniques, it is literally possible to pull someone towards you by touching them with the outside of your hand, upon the outside of their body somewhere. And when you see it, it looks like the master has magnetic powers. And that's because he or she does!

The point is you can pull someone towards you.

This is a great traditional classical piece, albeit it was not at all regarded as 'classical' Indian music for a long time, on account of that it had been decried as a style and looked down upon for centuries: