This is not really a private private message, but it is a piece in a certain way, just for our 'Bill Smith' - who will know exactly what this is about... ...or at least, he will know from personal experience, as much as what I know about it!
This week, here in Australia we had the first showing of the new 'Loki' made-for-television series. Which was of course Loki Episode One.
'Loki' - Tim Hiddleston, 'Episode One.'
The story arc apparently - since I haven't watched it - has something to do with Loki being detained by some 'time-travelling police' or something and then it all goes from there.
Loki has broken a bunch of 'laws' or 'time rules' or something, and has been going and doing things and being places he is not supposed to 'go to' and 'do at.'
And this despite that Thor has also been there and done stuff, but somehow Thor gets a pass and Loki does not.
Well, I'm not going to take issue with the writers - it's their story after all and they are making the stuff all up.
Francesca..
Now Bill and I though - we are not making stuff up, are we Bill??
The trouble with what we have been saying here for a while - is that we are not making anything up.
So you have not been reading 'speculation.'
Do human beings have anything worth coming across Galactic distances to 'take?'
I dunno. Do they?
The music below is a composite of four pieces by the great and largely unknown German female composer, Amanda Maier.
I like this stuff. It has a certain 'modern' touch to it yet retains all of the classic modal meanings and all those technical affectations like glissando elements within emotionally uplifting or sadly falling arpeggio runs.
(Honestly, I was so hoping and even planning for this to be a calming, quiet, and beautiful article. It isn't going to be).
Wouldn't it be so simple, for that the ET Aliens simply descended upon the front lawns at the White House, and explained to us unambiguously and in person, all that we needed to know and understand, of time (travel), and the ethical and moral value requirements, that would allow us entry to the Galactic Federation (or so Joe Rogan says that there is one because he has interviewed important people who have direct knowledge... ...right?) - if we agreed to adopt those values?
Now I have deliberately chosen the form of expressions used in that rather long sentence above, in order to describe to you, some of the problems with Genesis 6:3.
'Descended' is 'nephal.' 'Nephilim' does not mean 'the fallen angels.' It means the descendants, of intercourse between Earth women, and other beings.
'For that' is what is known as an Aramaism - which is something along these lines: They err, and he dies because thereof (it; the 'erring'). Aramaic has a habit of using the plural at the beginning of a sentence, but then using the singular to categorize the subject, although the clear intention is that all or many thereof (them/they) are affected by whatever thing is said to be happening.
What Genesis 6:3 is actually saying is this:
'In erring about his nature and substance, Man causes his form of flesh, to die at around 120 years of age on average; and he does not thus continue in a straight way forever.' This phrase 'in a straight way' is exactly what the text actually reads, and is almost always translated incorrectly as 'contend against.'
Man lives here on Earth. He does not travel anywhere either via Einstein-Rosen bridges, or by another means or in any other fashion contradicting the constraints of time and space.
The 'trajectory,' (meaning profile) of human organic life, is along a very limited path which falls short of being actually 'long,' in any meaningful Cosmic duration (space-time).
There is a word, in the Bible - 'falling short' - and that word is 'amarteia,' and it is Aramiac and also Greek. The word in the Hebrew means 'doesn't pass' or 'passes astray/goes this way and that but not straight along.'
All these words really, are about 'passage,' and duration of passage and line of passage.
So what is going to happen to you, if you pass your life as an ordinary human being, is that your organic life will fail at some point, and the cells will not self-replicate in a youthful condition and then mostly not at all, and they will wear out, and you will die.
And that is not what happens to the beings inside of the 'flying Tic-Tacs.'
Ion shower
In fact, we are pretty silly, really, given that we do know quite a good deal about our DNA and what some of the messaging in there does - and it is very clear (because why are aging packets of DNA so discretely in there in the first place?), that it has been 'interfered with' if not exactly 'interdicted,' in that, if you even just simply eat something pretty banal like young broccoli sprouts, your 'aging genes' will be turned off and there is opinion to suggest it may even 'be reversed' up to a point for some cells.
As something in the Book of Psalms also says: 'For He remembered that they were but flesh, a passing breeze that does not return.' Psalms 78:39.
You do not have standing, to meet with ET Aliens. Joe Biden will be dead within *.
And there is not a single thing, that you, on your own, are able to do about it.
The human mind desperately needs cause and effect, logical argument which is sound according to its own understanding of what 'sound' is, before it can have faith in something which it has not before, encountered in any clear way.
Why are you, you yourself as a person, an individual, also only just 'a passing breeze that will not return?'
The insidious subtext - which you cannot immediately see - in otherwise great Hollywood movies such as 'Nine and 1/2 Weeks,' is that it is only moments, and thus even only those 'special,' 'enshrined' good ones, that you ought to regard as 'real.'
This puts a commodity value on 'special moments,' and sells them to you.
Is that how you want it to be?
Only one special moment left for you...
'But if - what if you just took me up just one time, on board your space craft, so that I was able to see, with my own two organic eyes... ...Then, then for sure, well, maybe I still wouldn't sign up to what you ET's are saying, but I will seriously consider it for sure! Meanwhile, fuck you because I am so smart. You cannot do anything damaging to me. And anyway why would you? Right? Why would you? I am so great, after all. My governments and leaders are so honorable and good. We are so woke.
'Prove to me, Calvin, prove to me with scientific proof and evidence, that what you are saying is true even in the slightest. And then I will believe. And then I will do everything you advise. Because I always have done in the past.'
If someone said to me, eat that last bowl of noodles down at Newton Circus, and hold it in your memories, enshrined, as one special moment... Because that's after all all you will have/might have, anyway.
Would you?
Facing truth is apparently, either intrinsically impossible for humans to do, or by nature a huge struggle.
Shall we do a re-cap, or just walk straight into the magic right now?
It wouldn't be as much as ten who will 'get this' now - what is about to be said - maybe three or four and then even you will have a hard time really believing it or at least you will feel slightly uncertain...
Ah well, let's just go right into it. This thing is published by Neue Welt Musikverlag Gmbh & Co. Kg.
Pine needle tea...
...Same kind of people who do our 'free-to-read' site where some of you have been reading a few longer narrative things.
So, anyway, thanks to Mr Hans Loders and Agfa-Bayer for their continuing support to the arts.
If you go Google-Search pics for the word 'exhilaration' you will find endless images of people falling - skydivers, divers, people leaping from cliffs, all kinds of things like that.
If you take your life savings and plunge them into some 'nuther Stock-Market proposition, the last thing you want to be fighting against is gravity.
As you know, and I'm sure that you do know, the national flag of the State of Israel is not the Star of David; the Star of David has only five apex points, not six. The Shield (or 'star') of David is formed from lines over the three dots of the segula. The segula, or segulot, is the base structure of the revolving cycle (which is 'gal gilu') God employs to re-cycle 'souls' inside of types of bodies in actual specific, 'eras' that have defined characteristics. As He destroys them.
However, even Wikipedia of course blatantly lies and literally outright shamelessly declares the central symbol on the national flag, to be the Star of David. And probably, millions of Jews even think that it is.
I detect, of course, that some here will cling onto these run-of-the-mill popular fashions like 'the Secret' and 'manifesting through concentrated focus' and all of that. If you imagine obvious popular anything contains actual secrets, well good luck.
But this here where you are is not a popular place.
So, back to the three of you...
Fairy... ...floss. Has anyone seen any fairies - right there in their living rooms yet? You're not trying hard enough.
The symbol on the national flag is also inverted, when it comes to claiming that it is the Star of David. Same with the two blue borders, they are not exactly inverted but they are on the wrong edges if they are intended to symbolize the prayer shawl.
Remembering that I have said earlier, the exact music we are now playing (here in these Blog posts) is a parallel set to what we might have used, if we were to show you the real thing, but, they will serve to show if anything a more (superficially) clearer idea about things.
So things ought to be quite accessible.
The pine forest grows, almost everywhere, and the criminals come into it, stealing an amount from every tree and amassing all of that for themselves. And they make laws preventing you from taking any parts of the trees.
It is green, it is vast, it is verdant -, simply, it is luxurious. You can use the pine needles, the timber, even the pollen is good for, is good for -, well, you will have to look that up yourself!
Effectively it is 'money.'
I mean if they knew what they were actually programming for, these things would be great. 'They' have them 'out there,' you know.
But what makes the trees grow in the first place? Why do trees grow? It isn't because there is gravity bringing them down, or the machinery driven into the plantations and forests to cut down trees...
If we go back to previous discussions about feelings, and the consciousness levels and direction and flow of ideas, we cannot use gravity to attain anything when it comes to obtaining money. Nor especially, to 'sense' where it is - and as said many times here previously: money is never where you see it, because it is always in motion. So there is no use you sticking your bucket out where you see the money there 'now,' because by the time your bucket has got to 'there' - it is somewhere else. The money, that is.
I mean you must have been alive already a long time on the planet, and subconsciously you know good and well (don't you) that governments have no track record of making money, but only in stealing it. Same goes for banks. But to some extent this is just your 'conspiracy thinking' derived from lots of disappointment. Isn't it? I mean it's only just a 'feeling' you might have that they do this - how clear are you about what they actually do, and what that might be compared against on a positive example side?
Nevertheless, let's define it with a touch more clarity - or, at least, let me position the thinking along certain lines that you are able to feel better; get a stronger internal sense about.
Here comes the magic. I cannot wait for some certain person to say they never 'got it.' : )
Like I said - only three.
Just a slip of simple-minded poetry, right.
LOL
"My thoughts pass away with the coming sea.
All the faces around it was a wisdom for me.
Follow my proclamation for a new experience of life.
I am well aware that vast swathes of people everywhere are deeply invested in basic templates, patterns of thinking and 'girders' in the propositions they count on to deliver their own fundamental outlooks to them - girders that they consider to be facts.
Earlier today I was asked by someone to watch a lecture by a mainstream professional academic - who happens to also be a rabbi - on certain ancient fragments which end up being part of Western 'occult' thinking, I suppose you could call it; running the gamut right through the writings and ideas of Cornelius Agrippa and Marsilio Ficino and all the other standard well-known figures in this area.
Around 2,000 bucks! Not cheap, eh, KP! You know what it is made from, because you said...
This lecturer did much the same thing that everyone else does who speaks on these subjects, and he even made the same claim that most modern academics do about one particular body of writings - namely, he said that while the 'dialogues' mostly all exist still, there are no full copies of the 'direct discourses...'
Now these sorts of ideas are treasured by academics and one cannot disabuse them of this particular specific thing to do with 'discourse versus dialogue.'
This Blog has become now, but a thin thread of silk to grasp onto if even one may do so at all, since I had, since some time ago now, stopped expressing very clearly all the things I had wanted to say, else we would have ended up in the ditch of the same disputes one will have, if they ever tried to say to modern academics something about a certain numbered 'letter' of which we do indeed retain both originals and copies in museums. Were I to even mention the actual number, already smart people would know what I am referring to as well as the key identities involved.
I cannot say it's really a 'dispute' at all either in academia, or between those who are strictly occultists (in a manner of speaking) and the world of purely mainstream institutional academics (which includes churchmen and women of course and rabbinical thinkers).
Encryption. (I just had to delete something from right here! lol)
That is because no one possessing the knowledge would care to bother the academics.
The Fifth Century produced, of course, the guy to whom is attributed 'Gregorian Chant.'
It is not until virtually a thousand years later that we encounter Agrippa and his disputes with the church. But it was in fact Pope Gregory, who was first to face this idea about the lack of substance of the higher mind, and in his case, it arose from a dispute about whether the 'resurrected person' was so subtle as to be impalpable.
In today's world, the exact same argument still persists of course, but it takes the form of an argument between science and the current iteration of psychology - and West Coast American folkloric culture...
Interestingly, I noted this lecturer I was listening to, actually refer to 'Attribution Theory' along the path of his dissertation - but I must tell those of you who are not aware 'Attribution Theory' is mostly today a management tool, since (and you will find this statement right up front in Wiki when you go look, because you will do that...):
'...Humans are motivated to assign causes to their actions and behaviors.'
However most people you will casually encounter who pick up 'Attribution Theory' - as our friend KP is either permanently verging on doing, or he would have now except I have gotten in first around him here, as it were(!) (See, I can do 'future thought crime' blaming too, right?) - and sling it at you, want to use an extension of it, to the (this) effect that: things that actually happen, have causes we falsely attribute due to our own pre-existing biases.
'Substance' = meat + potatoes; impermissible substance = + bacon. ...At least it is for you good Muslims, who insanely come here and read.
By this moment in the route I had set about to follow, perhaps just a year ago now, I was going to show all the people who read here, a systematic mechanism, whereby you will ineluctably gain money, attain wealth - although it will not be from the 'work of your hands' as it were.
You see, a great pine forest grows over several years - starting out from seeds to saplings and then young trees and then to great tall trees. And in that time, many forests must go through very deep winters with very deep, heavy snow.
'Money...' is exactly like that.
Sometimes it is in the deep freeze. Sometimes it is hidden. Sometimes it exists only in seed form. The underlying force, including the exchange or currency substance - is something quite 'other' than paper or even computer digits.
It has flow, it has force, but it also has real substance.
Money does not 'die and go to dollar heaven;' not either as a 'body so subtle as to be more subtle than air and no longer a tangible thing' (the heresy of Eutychius of Constantinople, which Gregory the Great debated against), nor simply because it theoretically has no substance at all or 'actuality' other than its 'currency' and material expression (coins, paper etc).
The only thing different about money compared to a pine forest - is that you cannot see it, in its true underlying form.
Consequently, neither are you able to 'see' when it is covered in heavy snow. And nor can you easily see it, when it is thick and green and prolific. This last thing you would be amazed at knowing fully and understanding at depth - because you would be shocked that it is not at all as you might imagine, namely that you can easily sense when it is around in volume and flowing at a high rate...
Because If you were able, after all, you would not be as poor and broke as you all are!
And despite that you are, the majority of you would yet argue with me like your lives depended upon how strongly you can cling onto the bad idea.
As my friend Bridge regularly says - 'turn up at your house, in your living room, right now this evening as you are watching tv, and say hi.' You see, if that happened, half of you would actually make an appointment with your local lunatic doctor to ask him to tell you that you are not having hallucinations, and most of the other half would tell all their friends immediately without realizing the jealousy, envy and rage they would be inviting on themselves.
As for the remaining three of you - I or someone very like me, is about to show up at your doorstep, or even right there next to you in your living room, and hand you over a set of keys, plus a pair of binoculars with which to see the great, big, deep, green, pine forests.
Personally I cannot fault Stanley Kubrick's last movie, even though it is only a pale reflection of things - yet even so, it contains almost all of the key elements you will need to attain what you want you possess.
And I go back to it often to make some points, although these are generally points being made at arms length. Because believe me, if you were right here, with me, in a very short few moments you would not 'be here' at all!
There are a few of you who wonder still whether I am simply pulling your leg, right?
2 billion people on the face of the planet today are believers in the Quran and Allah. The Wikipedia entry, for example, on the 'Rightly Guided Caliphs' (the first four successors of Muhammad, who led or ruled the believers after his death), is pages and pages long, and goes into great detail about their battles waged and all the territory they roamed into and what happened there, down to the numbers of soldiers who went with them and how many they conquered in various particular specific battles and so on and so forth.
There is not one single item of historical evidence for their having ever existed, however, at all.
There are no coins dating from the actual time they were supposed to have reigned and ruled, no monuments, and no independent accounts of them anywhere - not even from Muslims. The entire narrative begins with a certain 'Muawiyah' allegedly, since the actual documentation about him with regard to his being the emir of the believers, is two hundred years later in a recension by other writers altogether - the main one of these being by a certain Ibn Hisham of Iraq, who is regarded by all classical scholars, as 'not reliable.'
Timothy, a writer of a short 'book' in the Christian New Testament, is - despite all Christians everywhere virtually decrying LGBTQ anything - a gay guy from then Anatolia (sort of Turkey), who was known to have personally hated women all of his life and was eventually stoned to death because of it.
Now.
This is not to say that there are not huge truths in significant ancient writings, because there are - but I would like to direct your attention to that episode in the movie I bang on about all the time, where Tom goes to the gate... ...and gives them the pass-code.
You wouldn't have so much anosmia if you looked at the tower there, and instantly thought: Serge Mansau. But did you? LOL prolly not, right?
Right so there are a lot of people who tell me, rather often: why, if you have so much knowledge and power, do you propose financial arrangements over various things?
Well I don't, really. I try to warn people especially the too youthful and the naiive, to stay away and not mess around with things that are going to potentially drown them and sweep them away somewhere they don't want to go right now.
Daneila Niederer-De Lillo, who just played this track I shall be using in a forthcoming 'thing' - a little something that will certainly spin a few heads - has not uploaded it anywhere properly yet, and so the music I have posted here today, is a substitute item, that is not like the one I wanted to use but it will certainly do - especially if you are still in the mode of quietly just 'contemplating' rather than partying (which is what I'm all about right now).
So after you have thoroughly pushed yourself to overcome your 'anosmia,' and think you are making some headway, and you think you are getting glimpses of 'lights' (lol)...
...then what you need to remember is what Tom did at the gates.
Right?
Remember that?
Okay so right off the bat I want to tell you no one uses 'words' or 'numbers' at all; not for pass-codes, and your personal log-in.
What you should be seeing, are literally plain sort of opalescent, jade or creamy milky colored 'casts of your face,' together with certain symbols that pertain only to you exclusively (although as far as I understand, these are not necessarily unique, there will be others who have similar symbol links that you do - and that will mean they are like you).
Just as I have criticized other narrative accounts of things above, the 'rangavalli' Vedic system is completely and ludicrously mangled up into a bunch of pop culture nonsense.
But for you, it is possible to 'extract' or to maybe 'extricate' some symbols and ideas out of the common material and to use them correctly.
Even the Sanskrit and Pali text regimes described today are very very primitive and no one writes like that anymore anywhere - the actual 'scripting' that is used (so I'm talking used 'somewhere,' right?) is like running writing and leans over to the side, although it does indeed have multiple layers per phonetic symbol or at least you could say, written-down 'phoneme.'
The problem you will be having, when you attempt to make contact - and that is regardless of even if you have spent a bunch of money and are attending some Monroe Institute thing or the like - is that you have not been 'logging in,' and very likely you don't know what your log-in is, or how to get it/retrieve it.
I just included here a copy of the Pali (Devanagiri)/Sanskrit alphabet and number chart. The most basic thing you should know well and be able to recognize, or 'sense' is personal to you, at the very least - is the first letter of your first name.
And by the way - this all happens to be in the New Testament but I ain't telling you where to find it!
Coming up very very soon, will be the next in the series of little prose texts we have been 'putting forth' - and the only people who will be getting this free, will be you. It will give you an insight into things our friend Stanley did not set out in picture form, and you will see however, just how much he was sticking in, though only in the form of symbolism - whereas in this upcoming thing, you will find it in its true form; which will make a world of difference.
