The 'Suda' is a 10th century Byzantine fraud. It has nothing to do with ancient - original - ideas and narratives about various figures of mythology or deep antiquity.
The Suda records various stories about Perseus being some actual 'king' or other and founding the city that Paul the Apostle went to (Ikonium, because it has an icon of the Medusa there that Perseus slew) - but these are ludicrously later fairy tales designed to undermine the actual ancient narrative that Perseus was from a Divine Father and a mortal woman.
Medusa is regarded today as an awful creature, and 'evil' - but she is not that. She was overcome with grief that her children were being killed by Poseidon who continually raped her within the Temple of Athena.
High on a mountain...
Athena therefore, turned her into an object both beautiful and at the same time deadly - so that even the Mighty Poseidon was unable to approach her.
Perseus, being a god himself, was able to terminate the Earthly life of Medusa - and so also, end her own suffering.
Dreams of snakes are widely misinterpreted by popular explanations.
'Snakes' in the spiritual sense, are the visceral effects of feelings of injustice - and be these small or large, they offend the Gods, and a good person will feel such things inside their stomach.
These spiritual snakes also possess venom, with which they can either strike out against an adversary, or if the adversary is not available to them, they will in fact envenomate their own human or semi-human (part-Divine) carrying body.
Again, the head of Medusa had supernaturally living serpents on it, that, even were a certain head of one of them to be cut off, it would grow back again two-fold. So, even though thinking and using logic were albeit capable of delaying the poisonous effects, they could not actually defeat the problem and only served to make matters worse by effecting a sleeplessness in the person who had the unresolved injustice held within them.
Or flying in the air.
Only a God can solve the matter.
Which is why there is this dynamic force inside humans - when they are soundly-footed. An unsound or actually evil person, has no sense of the feelings that injustice must bring to a sane person...
So hence there is a concept about the serpent force arising within someone, and going up into the clouds and meeting the Immortal Dakinis - and these must be struck with the fangs of the snakes. or serpents, and they understand the problem then, and transmute the poison into 'medicinal magic' (pharmakeia) whereupon only then, can the person have rest and sleep.
And the matter of the Injustice, becomes turned over to the Gods, who devise the appropriate solution.
Perseus never died.
Today, to begin to deal with 'dreams' (these are in fact Divine Visions) of snakes or serpents (these are always the ones that come from the stomach), one must employ the golden Persian medicine - saffron.
If you wish to encounter the supernatural dragon spirit serpent Ladon (he is dead now; not living on the Earth materially as such), who guards an impressive Treasure (literally is a material one), then you add oranges and kumquats.
To appease the most dangerous children of the early Gods on Earth, young maidens offered frothy wine mixed with Poppy Mallow flowers rather than what some people think 'Poppies.' There's plenty of Poppy Mallows in America.
Hercules killed Ladon. Hercules was the son of Zeus and the most beautiful semi-human woman - Alcmene - whose great-grandfather was Perseus.
Dakinis always are linked with flowers, because flowers aspire to see the Sun...
Have you not observed, the absence of modern-day 'divine phenomena' - like for instance in the matter of the demise of the last Pope in Rome, how that he lies 'in state,' as they say, and none of the Angeloi descends in full view of the hundreds of thousands of onlookers in that square where stands an obelisk in the middle, thrusting itself into the sky, to take him to some heavenly abode...
Have you failed to observe the distinct lack of response, to the imprecations of those under the gun (and the bomb and the knife and the missile) against heaven, or the fervent prayers voiced into the silent skies?
Fervently they pray to the Gods - or to 'One' God as the Monotheists will have things. And nothing happens; there is no reply.
Once Upon A Time...
Let me take you into history, and observe with you certain ebbs and flows -.
Before the French Revolution of 5 May 1789 - and we are approaching at least that day and month soon, otherwise it is no particular anniversary thereof in terms of the years - France's intellectual scene was housed in the salons of rich women.
This began in 1610 with a distant relative of the consultant to 'Men Who Stare At Goats' - Guy Savelli - Catherine de Vivonne, marquise de Rambouillet.
You will notice that after hardly two hundred years, certain males took extreme and indeed violent, exception to the style and atmosphere of culture.
After 640 BC, the courtiers of King Josiah, altered the entire religion of the Jewish people, eliminating all references to the female divinities who previously, were intrinsically part of the culture and the religion.
He changed the practice of using the Medea Cult 'Phoenician Purple' on the prayer shawls, and eliminated the women priestesses and oracles who presided in the Tent of Offering.
...And have you not noticed that for some reason specific to 'the Gods' (or to this Unique Entity, the Monotheistic 'God' so people say), the Realm of Divinity somehow requires people who write things down - scribes, writers-down of words as it were, and laws and rules and stories and histories.
...And she went into the forest and got lost.
In the Sanskrit, Saraswati employs the large-brained god Gan, to rapidly scribble down everything She inspires him to record as She speaks to him telepathically incredibly quickly.
In the Norse system, Saga pours out a particular kind of 'water' of knowledge taken from a hidden spring beneath the Universal Tree, in a place where they both more or less also get drunk, I believe -, a place which has the name of a sunken way, full of hidden treasure.
Naturally today we wonder why a God would not merely have an electronic tablet with unlimited memory, powered by a Chinese 'eternal battery.' Why would such a powerful being need some lowly human agent readily capable of many mistakes, to write things down?
The Gods do not require humans to write things down for the sake of the Gods, but for the ways of human beings.
And while they are capable of great devastation, the Gods style is to rule by subtlety.
And even so, that whole system can be usurped, turned over through the violent material rages of demonic identities quite intent on preserving their power over Mankind.
The Earth is allowable to be traversed by the rulers of each of the Three Realms - the Underworld, the Cosmic Ocean, and the actual Heaven.
She had spent too much time hunting for mushrooms to make a fine stew for her grandma.
Far from being this putative 'Paragon of Animals,' Man is a citizen of Chaos - but this word does not mean what people nowadays think it to mean according to their 'Bible studies' (remembering that these are from Josiah, and from the French Revolution, and Descartes and Atheism, and from the Mohammedan Revolt): in reality it means formlessness, without form, void of clarity, purpose, meaning, shape; yet plastic and ready and able to be shaped.
It can be shaped by the Devil, or it can be shaped by a God.
The Nature of God is always that it is fully Good.
The second you understand the Nature of Who you are dealing with, and converse with them in their style, as well as on your terms - you will discover that they answer you back.
And then of course everything changes and you will look upon the countless masses, as Arjuna the great warrior did, as he conversed with Lord Krishna, saying - 'Behold! The vast armies that were arrayed against you are wandering blindly into your mouth, and you are consuming them.'
And at once he was filled with compassion for the doomed.
And he continued his speech, which is recorded (by Vyasa the Sage), thusly - 'And as I beheld the scene, Krishna, alone and unarmed, was defeating all his foes one by one, inexorably, and I was filled with remorse for men and for their fate.'
Naturally, since we are all raised with the traditional Fairy Tales from early childhood, we fail to see that the world has moved on from simple forests and trees and carriages and hooded capes and wolves and wood-cutters.
Yet the narratives will be the same, and the style completely the same, and even the figures and the personalities exactly the same.
This is actually a book, would you believe. Produced by the German coffee table publishers Taschen for Ferrari.
...Somewhere there is a glade, or a sunken bench, or a depressed grove of walnut trees, not far from where there are black laurel flowers growing.
Jacob Grimm himself says that 'the gods share their power and influence with goddesses, and that the liquid that Saga and Odin drink is both the drink of immortality as well as poesy. With the Greeks the Musa is the daughter of Zeus. Saga can be none other than this.'
As it is still Easter in the Orthodox tradition, in the spirit of Jacob Grimm, we must add that Odin and Zeus themselves 'hung three days on a tree.' And that if Grimm has it that the Musaea have the power of sacred writing (or at least inspiring the human writers to write that), then you have never read the Gospels, unless you have read those dictated by women...
It was Medea who taught the art of the mystical Phoenician Purple.
You have never read the Christian Gospels unless you hear from the women who were there.
Don't argue with reality and truth and fact - your brainwashed mind will of course try to.
But the results of where your brainwashed mind will lead you is straight into the Jaws of Death and Destruction.
When you see the Truth, grab onto it. And never let it go. Use it.
Prior to around 320-something BC, there are literally no as in zero at all, references in any writings, documents, stones, monuments, coins, in Hebrew or in Greek or any other language, of any of the figures of the Old Testament - anywhere; not in Jerusalem or that broader area generally.
'Abraham' simply does not exist as a figure. And there are no names associated with the Torah identities in Hebrew or Judaic records - no 'Isaac,' no 'Benjamin,' no nothing. Maybe if you take Sanskrit words, you can force in 'Abram' and 'Sarah.'
The poor man Falernus, made this kind of thing to give to the God of Wine, when He visited.
The standard religious beliefs say that Abraham was around maybe at 2000 BC.
Now this actually does not mean none of the stories have some true basis, what it means is that the things passed down are unreliable.
And that does not make Islam and the modern interpretations of that involving this idea of 'corrupted Jewish literature' correct at all - far from it in fact, because the Quranic literature is literally the worst for borrowing other earlier stories and frikking around with them.
I will explain some very obvious and key elements and then attempt to ensure that no one is suddenly left thereby in a vacuum of religious beliefs and ideas!
The infamous Book or Books of Enoch, is a perfect example to look at:
There is only maybe eight-odd pages of sacred verse form writing in those texts that can be authentic.
And that is also, not an explanation of why it was not forcefully included in Canon because it is definitely somewhat in there... Jesus quotes Enoch directly and so do plenty of other places of the Gospel Writers and of the Letters.
The verse form sections are Enoch. But that is all that is actually from Enoch. Surprisingly, people seem not to notice that all the other parts are written in the third person in 'profane prose' (as Ammon Hillman would say) with some quotations claiming to be of what Enoch said, presumably to some other recorder!
Everything else, whilst in some places making reference to things that were culturally known and/or folkloric incident knowledge (was based on incidents that happened and were passed down or were part of group memory) - were made up in order to justify the use of force and violence by dictators and leaders and rulers and have nothing whatsoever to do with Godly things; the same is true of the whole of the Bible and also the Quran in particular.
It is well-known for instance, that drinking alcohol is forbidden (aka 'haram') in Islam, but what is never talked about is the reason specified in the Quran (Surah al Maidah) - which is that when you are killing people, it adversely affects your capacity to kill efficiently if you are drunk...
None of these books have anything to do with 'God.'
And the God of Wine rewarded him.
Steven M. Greer is getting better and better by the day, and it is because he is firmly underscoring that an individual's attitude is critical to interaction with advanced intelligent beings located just off the planet.
Greer recently made mention of the fact that he had been offered some items of technology, some devices, by the Russell Targ group and the military intel 'remote viewing' people, which mechanistically placed a person in that 'communication mode' with ETs. But he declined to use it because it circumvented the reality about a person's necessary intention in making contact at all. And he is completely right.
When we talk about 'electron spintronics' I could put together such devices but they are entirely unnecessary. [Which is not to say that I am not putting something together for you, because I am but it is an extremely cut-down version].
Greer is now providing quite a lot of video of the 'lights' responding to whatever his Ce5 groups are doing out in Joshua Tree and other places - and unless those of you who have already got some basic techniques via here are either not implementing them because of insufficient time or other reasons, or really not 'doing it right' - by now you yourself won't absolutely need to see videos of stuff like that because you have already personally seen the responses and could be a lot of other things besides.
It is completely obvious - when you know about Greek sacred oracular verse - that the Book of Enoch contains only a tiny section which is really 'Enoch.' And that section or those relatively few short sections never talk about anything violent or any sort of retribution by God except in the most generalistic ways: 'sin and the spirits created by wicked mortal flesh are destroyed...' He doesn't say people are destroyed and he never says in any of the verse form sections that the so-called 'Fallen Angels' are done anything with in particular. These are all utterly ridiculous stories added in later.
What is ridiculous about them is simply that either God is this incompetent power-mad over-reactive entity with absolutely no foreknowledge of anything at all (especially with not even a slight suspicion of what is an obvious likely consequence of having good-looking females enter the scene where there are powerful 'Watchers!' lol), or well -, the stories are lies.
Yes it is true technology is such a thing that as it advances, it is capable of producing ever more powerful weaponry; that is an obvious fact about it.
In our day, a poor man might not even have that much to offer (the vegetables). And there are already plenty of rich people that surely the God of Wine would better like to visit - yes?
So I would say make sure you don't so obviously show an ego that simply needs to have prime billing all the time, and that you can work with others and as part of a team where such a team is lead by the consensus formed around the best logical argument.
And that does not mean you cannot strongly argue a particular point or the merits of a case. It just means that a stage is reached where the winning logical case is uplifted by all, not just by some; that is not by only those who argued it in the first place where the others did not.
Here is how Enoch puts it:
'These words are for a remote generation, at a time far in the future when people have learned a great many things, and those who are not evil are selectively supported...'
I'm out here, on my own, it's getting dark -, and...
Nah.
Is nothing like that. Too much. LOL
Was in the Perth Mint on Monday - the queue was pretty long and it took me almost five hours to get to one of the bullion dealing cubicles. There were people both buying and selling, now that the price is seeing new highs. I mean to be sure, there's sellers around at any time, but right now they all want to advertise that they are obviously 'taking profits' or that they had been smart or something, I dunno. Or their grandmothers left them a heap.
Artwork; obsolescent technology.
The real reason for the lengthy process these days is that last year, the government here went into a flap because of the appearance of money laundering going on or being let through the systems, and so the systems have been tightened up almost to an extreme.
One consequence has been that it is making buying gold look like waiting in the artificial lines outside of Louis Vuitton!
But the point is not whether to buy gold or to sell it right now, the point is what the heck is happening in the financial markets, and in economies generally.
I've been sitting in late night coffee places last few days (as you do) and jotting down notes about capital and flows-of-funds in the economy - and this scenario applies right around the whole world these days, because of the alignment of global politics and banking.
So I've posted a pic of one of the sheets from my note-pad, and here you will see that I have described what I have termed 'bank lending stock' - this means mortgage-able land and buildings (and nothing else anymore), with the wholesale rate of money being the ten-year government bond rate and then a line for bank costs and a theoretical margin. This gives you the effective nominal average borrowing rate for real estate mortgages.
Where I have a problem understanding what went on, is how they ever got to the valuations (which is the modeling sample that you see in the oblong-ish box denoting '$100 billion').
This is nowhere near the size of any actual national property market that I had in mind, it's just a notional figure for ease of looking at the model itself as a dynamic interaction.
My scribbling.
Whatever the actual figure, say, for the Australian national market is, for real estate, it all started in its current form after the Stock Market Crash of 1989 - and where anyone got the moneys to float that property market after that Equities Crash I have simply no idea: there was massive unemployment everywhere in the world, then there was the Gulf Crisis, there was also 9/11, there was the so-called 'Sub-Prime Mortgages Crisis' (a fraud, in my view, when you look back in hindsight and the 'infinity liquidity' proposition of central bankers since that time).
There is no transparency at all as to how any figure for the market valuations of viable real estate was arrived at by bank lending and policies of central banks after the Stock Market Crash of 1989.
In fact, to highlight that, the Basel Agreement (which is two things, the Accords on banking regulation, and the Conventions, on hard core asset backing of debt and national currencies for transboundary movements of funds) has no meaning anymore and had none after the Crash of '89 when none of its items were adhered to by anyone; so they simply altered the key elements and watered them down to nothing and to meaninglessness.
What really happened was that governments and banks appropriated land and buildings, and/or also 'created' them, and re-valued them at absurdly high prices and then sold them to themselves for ever-decreasing interest prices on the basis of no securities and no ability to pay, and then on-sold them at a margin to the idiots who are called the citizens and also to foreign investors, who are just as much idiots possibly even more so.
The elimination of the hard-core asset ratio for lending and debt allowed for the accounting opacity to what has become the media-led and thus overtly political pressure to lower interest rates - against a backdrop of incredibly high risks and zero effective real liquidity, let's put it this way, in hard money terms - which is always expressed by the price of gold.
If I could really scribble, I'd pen designs like this!
You cannot actually lower interest rates unless the through-put on capital (so, over at least ten years worth of trade banking) has been providing an excess over the wholesale rate of money after bank costs and profits repatriated to shareholders - none of which has happened.
The real money comes from the tax receipts that governments have attained over the ten-year term of the domestic circulation of money (aka 'the economy/commercial sector profits'), otherwise you are denuding the currency and it must fall - Saudi Arabia, for instance, will charge you more for energy if they think you are making lots of money and can afford to pay; they do that by either literally increasing your gas prices, or forcing your currency down, or both.
This is what is happening in many countries around the world recently, and Australia has been one of the finest instances of it, with the local currency dropping like a stone every time the central bank (the RBA) claims loudly that it 'has lowered interest rates' and everyone claps their hands and thinks they are better off and can 'pay their mortgages.'
If you look again at the sheet of paper, you will realize that by up-valuing the figure in the oblong box (say to double; which is easily what has happened over the last five years), in fact the quanta of money increases dramatically where you see the '2%' and the 'plus 3%+' (total 5%+).
That's what people don't see and they don't understand and they don't want to understand.
The amounts of money are dramatically escalating and where is it all coming from?
Well I'll tell you where 'it' is coming from...
And then we'd be able to have nice things like this.
It is coming from your lifestyle, your quality of life, your health and well-being, the standard and quality of available products and services - in short everything is going to meet the mortgage debt of the citizenry.
And so because like rocket-ships, it looks impressive and it is real up to a point, it also means that it sucks all the attention and everyone, especially businesses, commercial enterprises, departments stores, leading brands, are stealing from their own past normal cost lines to feed an ever-more voracious mouth.
Advertising and marketing is shoddy or non-existent, service standards decline or even disappear -, and so on.
There is no room for anything other than the feeding of a fantasy, which is the magical increase in the 'in the oblong box number.'
It is no longer a case of an economic scenario - this is an event sociologique.
People are wasting their time looking at economic modeling and economic scenarios from this point on.
The outcome to this will take place on the social front, not the economic or the banking one.
When you look at the amount of hate everywhere for these women that went up on that dangerous damn rocket of Jeff Bezos's, you are looking at the overflow of deep negativity which springs from the mass subconscious knowledge that there is something drastically amiss in the society and in the economy at large.
The biggest argument against celebrating what these celebrities did was that they are all rich entitled brats wasting money when everyone else is suffering...
Suffering?
Nice things for females.
How? People's properties are going through the roof. There is virtually full employment. People are working lots (giggle). Money is free. Why are they complaining?
But it was a fraud. The rocket didn't really go into space. It was probably done with smoke and mirrors on a sound stage in LA.
Yeah. So what. Your mortgage is a fraud its apparent rise (in value) to the moon is done using smoke and mirrors and filmed on a sound stage in the back rooms at CNN and Fox...
Now none of this means property prices and values are going down any time soon.
What it means is there is a lot of anger in the hearts of the public.
The women of the world today, despite that they can go into space on tragically old-tech rockets, are not brave enough to send donkeys to the senate in place of their men (like the women did in Roman times)...
And that is what I mean by dumbed-down and stupid.
The end of this is going to be tragic. Although probably not for any of you because you have the inside run on things.
And like I say often enough around here - there are more animals in the forest than just bulls and bears.
...Never make the mistake of thinking that what you saw the other day was so fantastic and somehow genuine because it was using real rocket-ships and real material motion and travel from this planet up to high high up there. It was genuine in the same sense that some ancient Chinese emperor one time strapped himself to a large kite in order to fly 'to the clouds' and again another time had bamboo firecracker rockets tied to his chair in order to get that to take off when lit.
LOL
Marshmallow flower tea is different to marshmallow root tea - but they will both give you a nice sensation.
I mean yeah it was real.
And it was genuinely courageous of those people to do it all.
To fly in the air you need aeronautics. Not Chinese skyrockets and firecrackers under upturned garbage bins from LA alleyways. This is antiquated, it is obsolescent technology.
To travel into space you need seriously advanced astrophysics and key new understandings about electron matrix fields and light and how gravity even works, which the human race is nowhere even close to near working out on its own.
- Regardless of what Steven Greer and Bob Lazar say the government has behind closed doors. It doesn't have any such thing.
Later today, in about 12 hours, a bunch of girls will be travelling on the Jeff Bezos Express to just under 62 miles above the Earth's notional surface.
I will be watching the event online of course, rather than from any of these little white oval objects.
...On the other hand -.
Interesting things come in small packages... Sometimes.
Stranger things can happen than what people read about in the media.
Anyway, later on, at least the pod will not make a Splash! down somewhere and thus one could theoretically count on all the members being the same ones as who went up. Ain't that right, Jackson?
Meanwhile, elsewhere Brooke Eden will not be having a concert anywhere and none is scheduled until next month but it will also happen to be in Austin TX not far from where this 'Blue Origin' thing-y is going up.
LOL
If I went to a psychotherapist this week myself, they would doubtless confirm a strong case of Capgras Syndrome.
And that's because I would be quite liberal with the verbiage.
I don't mind telling people stuff. I mean, hey, what are they gonna do?
Why even Britney Spears is carrying on about 'clones' and has even I think written or part-way written a book on it called 'the Rose Project' - which is making the rounds of the Conspiracy Theory world.
Clones is not what is going on; at least not any clones coming from any lab in Planet Earth.
Me I just say - would say, to the therapist - I notice Britney Spears is banging on about clones...
Piastri wins again. How 'bout that. Who wudda guessed.
In the very very old days - and Bill Smith, you know about this from some recent experiences - there were these 'mystery places,' which meant not what it means now, but the actual physical experiencing of what is not natural, and taken by the common people to be supernatural.
Today some of the richest people can go into space or pretty near to it, and that is very supernatural for most of the rest of us.
Yet in the past, the richest people might own, a 'mystery place' - a place for the experience of the supernatural - for example, like the son of the lunatic Roman Emperor Sulla, Faustus, owned, in the the highest of the hilly lands of what is now the Carinola de Casanova.
At this place, which is a 100 miles away from where the surviving 'villa dei misteri' is in Pompeii (also in the region of Campania, same as Falernus), there most definitely was a villa dei misteri, which was likewise with the one surviving now albeit as a renovated ruins, a place where one could experience the inconceivable.
Of course today, in the place of rocket-ships, the ancient mural paintings will mostly all tend to show beautiful-looking people with wings.
But all of you, because you know about it, will certainly note the presence of the purple cloth almost everywhere in the depicted scenes.
This is the phlox porphurios from ancient Tyre and Sidon -, from ancient 'Atlantis' effectively.
This is the burning purple.
Actual mural on the wall of the Villa Dei Misteri at Pompeii.
This is the thing the rich woman, Lydia of Thyatira, was selling to Paul the Apostle and his entourage.
This is the thing that was used in the original 'talit' shawls of the Hebrew priests who carried the 'Ark of the Covenant.'
Faustus also owned, of course, the world's most coveted wine of all time, the doubly eponymous 'Faustian Falernian;' the first part of the double-barreled name being for Faustus, and the second name for the pauper Falernus, who was visited one time by the God of Wine, and who showed the God hospitality even though he had little.
I have no idea what modern religions are about.
They seem to be separated from reality and there is no material supernatural experience in them to be had at all.
Reality is like this - it's okay to be a pauper.
If you were to encounter a Divinity, it's probably better that you were one (a poor person) instead of a celebrity and very rich in the worldly sense - because then they would have many excuses to mess with you and not only with your mind.
I don't know any really rich people who are humble when push comes to shove.
Many of them fake humility quite decently but it doesn't last when challenged.
