Searching Without Disappointment

This is an important post...

But f-i-rst - one of our friends, Lachie K., is about to make a visit to Europe: going for several weeks each to Rome, Florence and Venice.

Lachie - in Florence (Firenze) there is the oldest pharmacy in the world, the Santa Maria Novella Pharmacy. Do not come back without going there!

Now, back to the normal program.

Rich kid, Lachie. This is not his house,
but it is like his house.

LOL

Whether it is in the pursuit of some scientific objective via pure research that has no certain outcome, or whether it is a deep religious conviction that drives someone farther and farther into some misty territory of the mind and of the spiritual sensitivities, ultimately one either attains a hoped-for objective, or else one dies at last in the truth, at least, of a knowledge of the error of one's path if not of one's journey.

To seek via an authentic scientific method, is never a totally wasted endeavor. Because if a final decisive truth is discovered that a certain hypothesis is definitely not true, then this is of course a scientific success not a failure at all.

When it comes to ideologies and religious matters though, one is faced with a slightly different variable, namely, that the basis of internal satisfaction is not exactly to do with (some) particular defined truth as such a thing is able to be confined in a laboratory for endless repetitions thereby establishing its veracity to the faithless mind expecting failure and defeat.

For it seems that 'Cosmic' truth or truths matter to the seeker only insofar as they can meet internal and highly personal bars of human individual feeling, not lifeless equations separate from the very human observer.

And yet, it is almost necessarily the case that here is the place where actual truth is more important, more critical -, and self-honesty completely and utterly indispensable; because there are too many ways to defraud oneself in sensory matters...

The oldest pharmacy in the world
Lachlan.

In other words, the outcome may feel right, yet it may not be right.

There are cults in Northern India, to do with Shiva, and in these cults, the standard practice is to imbibe heroin or other powerful narcotic substances. In the end, the cult practitioner may certainly feel that they are 'touching the face of god' - and nobody at an objective distance from this feeling and sensation will agree that the subject is really touching any divine living being's face.

Our good friend Lachie, whom we spoke of first here, might also go to some Florentine cathedral and feel in there a sensation of something 'sacred' and 'holy' and he would not have been imbibing anything stronger than some remnant wisps of incense and candle-wax, but still it will not mean that he is experiencing anything more unusual than the effects of particular kinds of architecture. Hitler's architect Albert Speer achieved as much with his stadiums and official government buildings.

This all circles back to this question of the Theodicy of god - why He, She, It, or They, permit the existence of evil.

Evil is a thing however, the nature of which only exists within some framework of a sufficiently advanced consciousness being involved, and is not something with any separate objective or mathematical existence apart from the feelings and thoughts of sentient beings who are able to apprehend it as the product of dynamic cause-and-effect functions where that sentience has adjudged a qualitative scale of beneficence and maleficence and the potential existence of an intangible spectrum of such polarity.

There is only one system of human thinking which provides an objective format along which pathway one is able to 'search' or to seek out, an ultimate result. This is the proposition that there are objective, virtually (or in fact really) mathematical, irreducible elements behind all of material reality, and that the dynamic interplay of those elements is what the reality of the Universe is, including that sentience itself also has irreducible (thereof) minimum core elements, the dynamic interplay of which becomes the equations or the formulae if you will, of moral and philosophical outcome (assessment by that sentience as to those things' status of qualitative 'benefit'). 

One of the best coffee places in
Firenze, Lachlan.

When you proceed along this path, you will end up at the stage where it becomes clear that whilst much that is sentient is able to formulate for itself, what seems good to it, individually, beneficial to it without direct reference to any other -  not much at all is as readily able to 'see' itself in all or any other external units of sentience; which is why ideologies and religions that become expressed as political practices and domination-centric or also self-elimination practices that are socially enforced (the correct way to put this is 'societal-ly' enforced but there is no real English word 'societal-ly'), cause evil.

Neither can a person reach to any 'ultimate satisfying objective moral reality' without passing first through the shared multiple sentience point, yet nor can one who has gone past there and reached actual final reality, go back and 'convince' anyone who is still living as a sentient island using 'proof and evidence...'

BECAUSE ALL SUCH PROOF IS ONLY AVAILABLE TO ABSOLUTE SHARED SENTIENCE.

We have an example of such a 'thing' though, that is - we have an example in physics and material reality, of compound location.

It is found in nature in the thing known as 'time crystals.' These are not crystals like you will imagine bits of glass and gems and so on, but lattice structures that hold together, but whose atoms interchange - rotate constantly - but in exactly the same structural positions on each discrete pulse, making the whole thing 'solid' and having structural and material integrity yet possessing real internal movement and cycles.

Hannah Arendt, the German-American historian, in discussing the nature of evil, in context of Adolf Eichmann the Nazi official said this: "...an inability to think from the standpoint of somebody else."

"And the Devil took Him up to a very high
place, and said: All the kingdoms of the world
I will give you, for they are mine."
And they are that to this day.
Except the time is running short.

And again: "His motive was to diligently advance his career in the Nazi bureaucracy."

I would place a stress on the word 'diligently' in our modern times, because you will see it used over and over by academia today, by politicians, by accountants, and by promoters of the orthodoxy of society as it stands today - and you will be able to note how each of the people using that word and those kinds of ideas, are unable to see past themselves. Anyone familiar with, for one good example, the life and career of the UK top spy at MI5 for decades, Stella Rimington, will be able to detect the reflected values of this 'modern' vogue of society and how she is at pains to critique other people from out of some strata of academia, sometimes treating them positively and often negatively with the implied meaning of her own competitive worth.

'Productivity' not production; 'diligence' not success.

The self-honesty of all of these minds is literally non-existent.

The Pope is not self-honest.

Hamas is not self-honest.

And ultimately no one who cannot produce a 'god,' a 'Jehovah on the Mountain,' or a return of Isa ibn Maryam (there are many 'al Mahdi's') - is being self-honest; and yet all of them will cut your throat.

You do not need drugs to see god or to 'touch the face of God.' 

All you need is to be able to live in another person's place.

This is also Florence, but it is not
the same Florence, Lachlan.
No, wait a minute...
Might be the same Florence...
Not sure...

Granted, I myself would not live in just any other person's place...

But that is not a condition. The condition is not that 'I' need to be able to be in all of the useless derelicts of the world's sentience location (aka 'see things from their personal ego perspective').

And it is certainly not that you or I ought to be jumping into the sentience spot of deliberately selfish and self-involved people.

If you 'search' as a Protestant or a Catholic or a Muslim or a standard mainstream Hindu or a Buddhist you will come to nowhere in the end. In the existential end, you will die; you will be dead.

If you search as the Pentagon for ET Aliens you could also get a slap in the face first while you're at it on the long road to nowhere.

We often forget to observe how complicated, how immense, how teeming - the Universe actually is.

It's also a hierarchy.

It doesn't matter what Stella Rimington thinks about how 'high up' she is. Same goes for anyone at the Pentagon today.

You can lie to yourself - and people like those lie to themselves continuously - but you will still end up where most humans end up, which is dead, and buried.

Therefore step one is stop lying to yourself. ...If that's what you are doing.

You need to, absolutely do need to be able to, place yourself in others' shoes.

All the way in.

Not part the way in.

You see, here is a pay-off for you in this: if someone goes ahead, becomes super-advanced, is literally let us propose, some kind of sentient being light-years evolved into the future, for sure they will care for weaker beings, but those on the path that is a shared path with them.

And they will reach back - to you, maybe.

And pull you forward. 

And the number one best way to ensure that it happens, is for you to start out doing the same kind of mind-set approach to the life all about you...

Yes life is difficult these days on this planet, in this world. But it doesn't have to be.

The 'problem of evil' literally doesn't exist for those who have advanced into the future beyond the kind of 'stage of evolution,' let's call it, of the people who characterize the human world here today. The problem of evil is a problem that is existentially true only where there are selfish entities.

All of material reality is a set of profiles, a complex pattern of sine curves, Gaussian waves; there is a 'right-hand side.' There is 'ultimately advanced sentience.' And you, you as yet still ordinary human, are not it.

There is ultimately advanced sentience because it is an existential logical necessity of material nature by the Gauss Curve. You don't need any 'evidence' - or any other evidence - for the fact. What you do need to do is live and act on the basis that since it is true, well then you'd better start complying with the frikkin' rules! Otherwise you're never going to see any Aliens. Why would they let themselves be seen?

...By spiritual criminals. Human beings are spiritual criminals. All of them.

When you go to a judge, in a court, to seek justice - you are going to a spiritual criminal who is a self-liar.

That is how come there are wars and people get killed. This is all just a place on the Gauss Curve.

So where will you search so that you will not be disappointed? Now don't lie about it.

Not some future time to come where 'all will be revealed.' Not some threat or promise beyond the now horizon.

Not some place where it feels powerful and sacred because the architecture was from a more cultured past.

Not some place where you feel a part of a group because there are a lot of other people there doing what you are doing.

 

  

Way Too Scary For Children...

Listen to me carefully. In this world there are things that no media company, not only would not even dare to talk about, their people would literally not be able to psychologically handle the information if they had it.

This week Tennessee Representative (to the US Congress), Tim Burchett explained a few key things to several news agencies, following his participation in a 'SCIF' - which as I understand it, is not necessarily 'being read into' the top secrets, but under secrecy provisions being given access to a 'Secret Compartmented Information Facility' - in this case which was specifically to do with the current Congressional inquiry into whatever the government knows about Aliens and UAP's.

Quote, Rep. Tim Burchett: 'Americans should know
what the government knows about UFO's.'

His direct statement to the news people was exactly what I have told you from several years back, namely, that there is known to be something, but it is outside of the FOIA process because the knowledge and details are in the hands of what he termed 'quasi-government groups' or companies with government funding who were essentially private now, if they 'even existed here at all any more...'

What exactly he meant by that I'm sure I cannot say.

And then he went on to say that unless someone stepped forward with evidence from those groups, it would be virtually impossible to force access through FOIA.

But why would anyone come forward gratuitously though?

Secondly, the whole aspect of 'with proof and evidence,' well what does that mean - that someone is going to give you anti-gravity technology, for example, for nothing?

What I mean by 'way too scary for children' is this: let's say there are some secrets which involve genuine, completely authentic matters to do with at some earlier point, official government engagement with beings not of this planet. (And we'll get to the key point presently).

...All of the currency of any kind of source opinion, of the very raison d'etre at all, of such beings coming here since the 1940's, or at least making themselves known, was always related to the nuclear bomb and what happened during the two major World Wars and the immediate aftermath context of a nuclear threat. No one from any quarter has ever posited another reason.

There is a small amount of factual basis to the insinuation that 'UFO's' were responsible for temporarily closing down some North American nuclear missile facilities.

But what is not made so clear by those saying that the point of their 'appearance' was some concern about nuclear wars - is not so much that they could prevent it, but whether they actually would do so...

Well there are no ancient tales about otherworldly 'agencies' preventing calamity; the stories are all along the lines that the calamity took place.

Sodom and Gomorrah, Atlantis, Tyre and Sidon - these were all ancient accounts of their utter destruction. Ironically, I guess, in the case of Tyre and Sidon, their stone remnants were taken and thrown by Alexander the Great into the sea to create a useful causeway.

You see the thing is this - the phrase 'the nuclear option' in modern parlance does not mean someone is going to use nuclear weapons to overcome an enemy in a battle; it means to blow everything up on the way out because they are actually losing.

When the nuclear bomb was first used, it seems to have been used to demonstrate to Stalin that the West had a very serious means of countering any Stalinist agenda and ambition in the West.

Iran does have nuclear weapons and very sophisticated delivery systems. So does China.

These places are in the first place ideologically driven -, not primarily driven by reason of actual threats against them.

No doubt both of them would argue though and say that 'regime change' is already an open goal by the part of the West that is led by the United States.

But 'way too scary for children' does not refer to these things.

Way too scary would be what you would find out, not so much if you were to see who, just who is involved with ET Aliens in 'private organisations and corporate entities or groups,' what they do, where they are situated -, but by the counterpoint, namely who are those opposed to such groups.

Because there are large scale, national 'arrangements' - some wealthy governments here and there, some 'philosophical' and ideological, even 'occult' you could say (and I'm not talking about Freemasonry in this specific context here) trans-global conglomerates - which are mortally opposed to anything that would give new and advanced power into the hands of a broad cross-section of the man-in-the-street human world.

We are not so much just on the threshold of major global conflict catastrophe, but we are rather close to the introduction of anti-gravity technology and also extremely light but strong materials technologies. These things would radically alter the topography of global economics and politics forever.

Over the next two years, you will see the stepped exposition in the public arena of various new 'advances' in technology (where they come from, who's to know) that will completely overturn governments and government systems all over the world. 

Unless the overlords can tie you to a 'home,' they cannot cause you to fight and die for a homeland.

In the coming weeks, maybe month or so, not a hundred miles from right here, there will be a very special wine tasting thing being held - somewhere - involving a wine of exorbitant price and value. If I can get a cam into there, I will show you a person, or even some people, who are literally of the kind that Rep. Burchett was talking about.

Now just keep in mind, you are only a few people, who come here and read at this place. This is not widespread knowledge and it never will be.

And we can truncate it real quick if things got too 'complicated' for any of us. Not being over-confident either. I acknowledge that when one team takes the field, the other side will also turn up on the day.

Hearing Voices??!

What?!

As people who are generally supportive here of fairly esoteric training programs like the ones provided commercially by the Monroe Institute, and since I certainly talk about some of the elements of those things in detail here - it is very important to create some considerable distance between anything like what is being reported in the news about people who go off the rails and do some really atrocious things (the Lewiston shooter), and sophisticated controlled processes to better and more functionally engage deeper levels of the human mind.

It should be made absolutely clear that there can be no linking the 'hearing of voices' with anything that Monroe Institute-style programs, advisedly speaking, enable.

There's nobody in the world that can tell you
this, other than someone who knows and can
say - Karl 'may have been' for many
years, not only just an 'asset' but an
operative of MI6. But he might have also
abandoned that at some point too...
I'll give you the secret that is 'traceable:'
it is to do with his shirt-makers.
Fact. Inescapable. Ask
Stella Rimmington.
Anyway they were Savile Row...
'Not many peeple noh dat...'

There are also a large number of modern chemicals - for one specific instance any kind of methamphetamine for example - that speed up the signal traffic between neural networks and brain centers, and their connected afferent and fundamental sensory terminating point nerves.

By tampering with the speed of those connections, it is always at least potentially possible, to have the brain cell memories of words and even phrases triggered in the immediate conscious receptive awareness, before any actual proper physical sensory stimuli went off (neural semiotic signal threshold). The jumbling of neural patterns and afferent/efferent responses is common with chemical stimulant use (or abuse, of course).

This can give rise to impressions in the brain of disembodied words and phrases, even whole sentences, being 'heard.'

We should all be committed, intellectually committed, and intelligently fully committed, to the view that we do already have our plain existent senses, and these must be the natural pathway to 'seeing' and communicating with very advanced intelligent beings - and not some other, mysterious pathway that becomes impossible to verify by external and independent, critical observers.

That advanced Alien intelligent beings often choose to behave highly surreptitiously, denying access to verification by others, other people, that is independent observers - is not strictly speaking our etiological problem or even our or an epistemological problem.

The Monroe Institute has as its most basic process requirement in the programs, that there is always someone there with the subject who is meant to be doing the 'targeted visioning.'

That person ideally should be trained to follow rules of objectivity in practice.

This does not mean that the observer should bear a demeanor of continuous gratuitous doubting, such as you would always find with a person like Richard Dawkins - and also de Grasse Tyson. Because that would itself necessarily already defeat the premise of true objectivity: by which is meant that the person there is someone capable of dispassionately recording what is going on, and what was said by the program subject in the 'mind state process' time.

Karl was her stylist at the end of his life.

In the very first place, the point never was to 'see' what was not there, when organisations like Eastman-Kodak's Hawkeye facility and Bell High Altitude Photographics were having specially trained and 'augmented mind state' map readers look at developed film...

...It was to have them virtually subconsciously interpret the images in front of them using what was presumed to be their 'deep mind,' absent from the normal (normally conscious state) doubt fear and anxiety about getting things right or having to 'see' anything at all from the highly classified intel maps and images.

What happened of course, was that they discovered that most of the subjects reported a much clearer set of sensory impressions than what they would normally experience in the ordinary waking state - not a more vague or dream-like condition. 

Like spectral colors that are additive primaries, when they all combine they create 'white' -, then in the same way intensified capacity to sense along the fundamental sensory pathways all at the same time together, as an actual meta-meaning (haptics plus semiotics) connected symphony, becomes something that is much more accessible in terms of a communication style, to super-advanced (possibly Alien) intelligent species.

And that is all that there is about it.

You're expected to hear their spoken voice coming from out of their 'ordinary' physical mouth. Not imagining something that appears to sound like a voice, or having some internal brain impression that seemed like you heard a word spoken or some snatches of words.

'Old school' stuff.

I can easily teach someone, one-on-one, to get to this state of play; but it is both impractical and very likely problematic to try and do such a thing simply on-line, via some 'cold medium' and some text.

It's also not the point that people just follow a process path that someone, no matter how good of a hands-on instructor they are, shows - when the core reality is to do with one's own deep inner outlook on the Universe as something they are living in, being actually present in.

Because most people today, and I say most and I believe it is that - are seeking to escape from their reality! So consequently it is just too easy for people at arms' length (IE on-line and at a physical distance), and un-monitored -, to try and use these kinds of techniques and ideas to get sensations just for the 'ride,' and also of course (flawed) sensations of 'release...'

I mean what kind of crazy person in any case, is hearing voices and then going ahead and following those voices -, when they say 'hey go kill a bunch of people!' 

That's totally nuts.

Actually, it starts to become suspect whether such a thing was even true, or, to phrase it better - just what are we talking about here, when a psychiatrist reports so-and-so claimed to be 'hearing voices?' 

Why would a person merely hearing a voice, then convince themselves that voice was more to be complied with than any other voice?

No I think we can discount that it was just a matter of someone hearing voices. 

If it were even true at all, then what is much more important is what the content of those messages or instructions were, and what then compelled the person to follow any of them.

Even crazy people who are organized enough to carry out major physical violence using tools, are not so random that they fail to follow linear logic altogether. They have assigned a moral content judgment and given a moral value label to their victims. How did they do that?

This whole thing about 'hearing voices' needs to be elucidated better in the media if people are expected to accept that was the only thing that was going on in that crazy person's life and brain and mind.

It's specious.

Also 'old School' but updated. Though actually
I just like the photo composition.

It's specious to think the cause of the deadly mischief was the hearing of voices.

When it comes to engaging with, or potentially engaging with; communicating with -, actual ET Aliens, what is the content of what that communication is...? What is it expected to be, from your side...? What are you seeking from them?

And that leads us all straight back to the greatest texts on morality and ethics and epistemology and mathematics and geometry and physics and aesthetics - the world has ever produced. Nothing less than that will do.

I'm afraid not. We cannot expect to come half-baked here!

Given that there is such greatness in the human background, why would you choose to leave it 'behind at home,' so to speak - when you were presenting yourself as a valid example of the human race to a truly sophisticated advanced other intelligence?

Who would you 'bring with you' as the paramount examples of humanity, to show to some incredibly advanced ET Alien beings: 'Hey, this is what we want to tell you that we are like at our best...' 'And we are not necessarily any single one of us right now as good or as great as that particular example/those examples, but that is our aspiration and our intention (to be like) and how we would like you to view us...'

; )

Did that give you a clue?

I mean did that just give you a really big clue?

Just remember - to avoid being 
hammered by the authorities(!) what we
will sometimes do, is
show 'connected' pics' but in upcoming, later,
posts here so as not to make things
too too very obvious.
Just like what you will find in the below music if you
bother to listen past halfway in...

Are you as to any doubt whatsoever that we cannot deliver here?

Matthew 13:52

LOLOLOL

Were not expecting that, now were you? Tell the truth now.

Trust you actually listened to the music clip in the last post here, right? Because...

Fundamental Comparisons

It is impossible to sell debt securities at virtually zero percent, when the obtaining market benchmark rate for debt is five percent.

Hence what we have going on all across the Western World right now is a fundamental illiquidity of mainstream capital.

And, certainly, that mainstream capital (paying mostly all zero percent coupons) is almost all entirely in the hands, not of private investment banks like it would have been in the past - but in the hands of government via their central banks.

In all the world, the place where
I found the most obvious,
casual and quite overt displays
of real cash wealth among the
people there - was Vienna.

Secondly, the basic and critical intrinsic reason no one is able to sell existing debt (IE not new lines at current rates or ahead of those - as will be necessary) is that governments insisted on forcing (borrowed money) capital investment into building projects and real estate (because these things are immobile and are easy to extract taxes from the 'owners' of) and stone does not produce anything, as the ancient Egyptian pharaohs eventually discovered.

Zero percent... Five percent. Zero percent. Five percent.

Well you will be soon enough looking at some percentage that it would not be advisable for me to say here right now.

And energy prices are going up.

So what happens next?

LOL

Not sure.

; )

'I - am - not - sure - that - I - can - say.'

I guess if you go down this doom-sayer thinking to what looks like its logical ending, you would have to think there is little or no point buying expensive wines - that is, 'investing' in them hoping to realize some kind of profit in the future.

But it is one thing to speculate about what a certain trajectory looks like from a present standpoint, and another thing to say that you know for sure nothing good ever happens from out of the blue.

Plenty of women still wear
opera gloves there.
In Vienna.

As our poet friend set down in verse in the immediate previous post comments section -, you could be suddenly blessed by a gift from some divine source.

That is indeed what the world needs right now. 

It does not seem, on the surface of things that human mortal leaders are capable of discovering any new solutions to literally age-old problems.

But why will you be blessed?

You are certain to be blessed.

You.

Maybe not others but just you.

Coming here you have opened a door - entered as it were, through a portal.

To another place.

Where bits of broken ceramic are all put back together with gold... (The Japanese art of kintsugi).

Shall we invite some people around and offer them the best wine - to be drunk from some kintsugi?

Shall we though...

We shall see.

 

Sinning With Wine

Well, it feels like sinning, anyway...

So you're at this restaurant, see. With people who know you and think they know what kinds of things you can get up to.

It's the sort of affair that someone like John Brennan might attend: there's career local Navy guys in their fairly dry-cleaned and pressed whites...

It isn't like the old days when Commander Bond was an authentic reflection of many people in the Admiralty (of Great Britain).

Royal Tokaji wine.
Last you easily two hundred years.

Today, Barbara Broccoli hasn't got it quite right - she says there is a credibility problem with 'old Bond' in the modern-day context. But there is no credibility problem with Bond; there is a credibility problem with the Empire.

'Here, John Brennan, you like to do transgressive things -. Here's something right down your alley."

Brennan: 'Who TF are you, pip-squeak.'

'Never mind that -, have this, casually vandalize this in three minutes.'

Hand him the small glass filled with its amber-golden thick liquid that definitely has a sulfurous scent.

Actually, preferably it isn't a glass, but a large glass spoon. That's the traditional way of having this thing.

You continue: 'It has taken fifteen years to have this ready for bottling, and this particular one has been in its bottle for a further fifty years. It takes a long long time to ferment and it hardly reaches 2.9% alcohol by volume even at the end.

'You can wreck this now in just two or three minutes.'

When you think about just how long it takes to turn out a very good Hungarian Tokaji (or Tokay), and you think how blithely one downs the thing until there is not even a single beading drop left inside a decent bottle, it certainly feels like sin doing it. I feel guilty about consuming, making something disappear, that took so long to make.

Very old fashioned style.

But there is a great secret here - Dionysus the god, himself caused humans to forget themselves and what they were doing in the moment; Jesus did the same thing when He 'gave out the wine.'

What goes cannot come back...

...they say.

But what would they know, John Brennan?

What would they really know?

Still, it still feels like an act of sinning to me.

Think of the years it took.

You can keep a bottle of Tokay for two hundred years (and people have done) and it is as perfect after that, or even better than, the day it was originally bottled.

Here we are, we humans, taking things that took so long to build, and consuming them in a moment.

Very old fashioned style.

This strange person told me, one time: 'Every mouthful that you take, think about what went into its making, and hope and pray that all of what it took becomes a part of you going forward.'

There's that phrase again. It's a 'Company-speak' phrase btw. Same as 'non trivial.'

Well, let me tell you - drinking the greatest wines in the world of all time is a non-trivial thing.

How do we go forward from here?

They say you cannot take things out with you when you go from here. That's not true. Because in any case, how would 'they' even know?

You need to find out what someone who has gone and come back says about it.

Going forward from here, take things from the past with you.

Nothing good ever just disappears forever. 

Find out what 'all of you' is, what it means - and then take all of you into the future.