'Magnetize?' What This...?

So you know that in the Middle Ages, there were these alchemists, right, who passed their hand over some lead or whatever, and it turned into gold.

Jordan Maxwell wants you to think this is just a 'metaphor.'

Okay, it's not a metaphor; they passed their hand over something, and it turned into gold.

Professor Martin says this is - or was, seeing that it was a while ago, back in the Middle Ages - demonic.

What is certainly true is that the texts that are still around, written by these 'alchemists,' were all written in code. And no one really knows what those codes are, even today. A code is not a metaphor. It is substitute language ciphers.

Metaphor is a substitute for the thing, a cipher is the thing in a substitute terminology.  

'Demonically,' it is possible to turn dross into gold. But 'they' have to use you to do it. 'They' do not have the facility to achieve it. They know how to do it, but they are prevented themselves from personally accessing such a power - they are not given the agency. So they have to take it... ...from you.

Theoretically, you could have the agency...

You do have the facility.

All the neutrinos in the whole Cosmos (this is a word, the demonic/Satanic/Luciferian cult loves, because it excludes 'transcendence'), are able to convey data by switching orientation to something, I don't know what exactly; maybe the surrounding dipole moments of other adjacent neutrinos... Don't know.

But in any event, the more they 'tend' to some orientation, the more they maintain that status.

Is this something we can throw the word 'magnetize' onto? I have to do so, I do not have the language to call it anything different.

So now this is going to really reveal something crucial in a second. But first, a quick word on the Norse 'gods.'

These are separated into the Jotun (Titans/giants), the Vanir, and the Aesir.

'Vanir' means those who bestow.

Aesir means they who breathe through (you/everything truly alive).

So we have three strata.

If you go to the memorial that the god Hermes made for you in Egypt, you will see the first of the three strata depicted for you to learn from:

And even this 'strata' is made as a triangle - there is a lion or a dog, a snake or a multi-headed dragon, and there is a falcon or an 'Egypitos' (eagle). 

When you are an Azov neo-Nazi guy, you will be out at the nighttime bonfires, screaming and yelling along with your 'family,' your pride of other lions - looking to feed your brute appetites. And you will be roaring as a lion. Over and over and over, inside your head, in your brain-cells, throughout your neuro-chemical systems, the exact same obsessed pulsation will continuously be going on. Until it's 'grooved in' there. All the neural pathways just etched in deeply into the organic structure. And the biochemistry feeds the 'lion' its rewards. 

If you imagine this 'triangle' now as three nodes with two at the ends of the baseline (of the triangle), and one vertically upright at the apex... 

Next take a vertical line and draw it down from the apex to the center of the baseline, so that you can imagine that the baseline can rotate this way and that, around this vertical 'axis.'

When the node represented by the 'lion' symbolism, is rotated one way, it goes towards the dog of Egypt... 

And when it is rotated the other way, it goes towards the lion.

Eventually, the lion can even cause the height of the vertical to contract, so that at some point, it can 'reach up' (figuratively), and claw down the falcon. And consume it.

In that way, one part of the internal 'structure' of the person, is gone, having been killed, and either eaten or just simply destroyed altogether.

The lowest strata of the internal being, is connected, via the vertical, to the next two strata, and, as the base triangle is rotated, it exerts a force on the triangles above, and 'potentially,' shutting off one of the most important things - which is a portal to the Universal transcendent field. This is something different to the neutrino world lines, but it is intrinsically connected to them; because it is, after all, the field.

Now when that happens, the being can no longer access the field at all directly, and must do so by stealing what it can of it, from any other living creature.

Now being that it is itself a 'lion' in dominance, it finds it easy to overpower most others and take whatever it wants.

And that's what it does do, and that is the reason for your unhappiness, your unhappy state of affairs as 'humans.'

Possibly, possibly, you could find some much more advanced, more powerful over all, beings to assist you oppose, and resist and overthrow your masters here, but then, this would necessitate that you yourself are not 'lions.'

If someone opened up for you the portal to the Universal field as it really is, you could easily turn lead into gold.

You most probably, do not have that portal opened at all or if at all, only very narrow of a sliver allowing anything to come through in you.

The reason 'they' are always on about 'enlightenment' ('illuminati' etc), is because it is very meaningful to them, and they do not have any access. They have to get actual field effects, literally off you.

Trust me, you don't know what this is...
Eh, Bill Smith? ...Comes 
from the Afghan Kush. ; )

The real technical lab people in this area, are all into 'melanin' in the brain cells, and they know this has a lot to do with consciousness, and what they are after is taking it, in as 'alive' of a condition as feasible, and trying to store it, retain its full functionality, capture it in synthetic structures.

This type of melanin occurs at peak stability in adrenochrome.

So that's where the conspiracy theory mythology about adrenochrome comes from.

Why do the gods, permit this 'demonic' group to live at all? Well they don't. They're not the ones keeping these guys alive - you are.

  

You Keep It Secret...

Sometimes, in this world, in this life, you find out something, you learn something, which it is dangerous to expose to others that you do know it.

This might simply be because it takes you outside of the 'group.' Or, it means you know they are guilty of something that you are not guilty of.

Either way, unless the whole context of power in human society changes, you keep what you learn to yourself when you are walking among wolves.

You can't beat that.

I am going to just briefly refer to the very last verse of that poem in the first of the two-part series here just posted. If you read it carefully, over and over, something may strike you about it, but if it does, just keep it to yourself - others will not agree with you, and they will hurt you if they can about it. That is to say, if you give voice to what thoughts you could have about it, they will insist that you are very wrong and that everything in that verse is noble...

Yet, like Karl Popper, that was easily one of the most subtle, and evil, Satanic, things you are ever going to encounter - if you are 'religious;' let's call it 'religious' anyway. The mindset could amount to a number of things but people will commonly say 'religious.'

It seems like one thing, but it is quite another thing altogether. Very subtle. Also very psychologically flawed, in a terminal way.

But let me not go on about it. Either you see it or you don't.

Wandering around on the planet here, most ordinary people have absolutely no clue how extremely - exceedingly - sophisticated, subtle, twisted, dangerous, deadly, things are behind the scenes.

When you think about the way the whole entire political structure and system turned to this question of 'man-made global climate change,' you will simply assume this was something that came up because scientists observed something.

Well they observe lots of things, they observe things all the time.

But this thing became a thing, something the whole world of politics, left, right, center, everywhere - made as a major agenda item.

Now let me go back to a saying: 'and the Earth acted as though she were in revulsion...'

Revulsion about what?

See if 'the world were revolting against something they were doing' it would be one thing, but now, now, it's you who are doing it - you are causing 'man-made global climate change.'

If 'they' were going to do something that the Earth would 'revolt' against, well... ...but they have it that you are doing something the Earth is revolting against. Right? Clever.

You're the one doing it. Not them. They're not doing anything... Right? Hadn't been planning to do this (this 'Third Secret' thing; I'll let you know what it is presently) for a long time already. Man they even have the phrase 'insane conspiracy theory' to throw at the Jedis around the place.

You never even saw it coming because you don't believe there is a non-human intelligence here, in control of virtually everything. Beings that live way longer than your tiny little human lifespans. Jordan Maxwell, in one of his over-the-top foaming explosions of injudiciousness, literally blurted 'they' were not human at all. And forever got the reputation of 'one of those.'

Alex Jones, does not have the gravitas of someone like Maxwell so he just gets drunk now a lot and laughs it all off. 

Some of you are just not going to 'get' this at all. Some of you are on to it already and there is a real creeping disquiet going on within you right now.

Okay so what is the 'Third Secret' explicitly?

Islamic culture, which 'borrowed' literature
from the 
Jewish jurisprudence headquarters
in Basra, just cuts to the chase - it is
full of astrology stuff.

It is not fair to take the case of Dr Malachi Martin (or professor or priest, whatever) and use something specific he says as the crucial source, because that will lead uncritical minds to think that next, maybe anything and everything else he says is 'unimpeachable.'

Well that is far from the case, as our foil here will loudly tell you at the earliest occasion (in fact he already has done so).

What is true about Martin, as it is also true about say, Jordan Maxwell, is that because they have studied so much ancient material in their original source languages, they have acquired tremendous genuine knowledge. Some of which you can use. In the case of Maxwell, the commercial demand to say things all the time (for an audience response), means that often in latter speeches he goes right off the reservation completely, mainly because he was simply in the first place only trying to underscore that the Bible enshrines 'astrology' as a true, god-given matter (which it does do, the word in there is 'mazaroth' which is telling the true future by the stars) - but it all got away from him when the general audience he was commanding never really seemed to be sufficiently 'wowed' by it. So he started to increase the 'wild' stuff. Simply everyone (powerful) was a Reptilian then.

Where Maxwell is utterly correct is that the heights both govern as well as reflect and in some way also absorb and 'process' the miniature, the microcosm beneath.

But these are just guidelines.

Post-industrial, dystopian
Apocalypse...

They don't determine the specifics.

Martin said the Third Secret was far worse than a nuclear conflagration... Well look, a pandemic like Covid is not worse, and chemical and biological weapons are not particularly any worse.

He said far worse.

The problem you are going to have is facing the reality of this, and how far behind the eight ball you were, and how literally sinister, well-contrived, organized, far-reaching, beyond any few lifetimes' scale - this all has been... When you find out and when you roll it around in your head for a good few days.

Okay, here it is (now mind you, the guy who knows this kind of thing, well, he has access, and that's another problem you have to decide whether it is worth even listening to any further):

...Now listen to me carefully. Imperial College London, has now, meaning right now, this moment, actual partly-cloned, partly android artificial 'human beings' with the memories of people who are 'dead.'

You can handle 'agency,' can you? You want access to the machine... Because you are on... ...the side of?

Help me, Obi Wan. Princess Leia said. Where is he, by the way? Does he even exist? Do 'light sabers' exist? What about 'Death Stars?' What about them? ...Some of you are not old enough to realize that all of this is true. Some of you are just old enough and wise enough to know that it is all true. Because you can add two and two and little white probe and 'man-made global climate BS' and Covid and right now you are just hoping against all hope we really do have more than just a couple of thirty foot aerial zippers. You wait till you see the Military Industrial Complex unveil their latest items. Make our little white Tic Tacs look stoopid. We have one showing up around the place. They have five hundred, all glowing in the dark. Not white though. They don't know how to sputter layer orthogonal mono-atomic you-know-what. Zipping around like you would not believe. With little human slaves slaving away, building them as fast as. Don't believe me, do you? LOL 

Makes you wonder why they didn't, don't, use them against the Russian's *, oops. What, you think tank or mortar shelling discolored all those tall residential buildings like that, and flame-grilled the burned, 'tree-lined' roads out there?

 

The Imperfect Machine

So, I'm going to try and deal with two points raised by people much earlier, that somehow turned up in my emails late, but I never saw them as comments here first... Hmn. Elon, what are you doing? LOL

Or whoever. Prolly not Elon. Eric Schmidt and friends, maybe.

Will look at those two points while also finishing the 'Part Two' of this current segment here.

Actually the questions are linked with this whole matter anyway.

Vanilla souffle.

1.There is no 'UFO religion' as such (although, well that's arguable too), because there is a concerted scheme to stop people from realizing who and what ET Aliens are, with the added 'trick' of insisting Aliens are weird or ugly. They are not. And you know who you can listen to to comprehend why (not)? Ye olde Jordan Maxwell. He was straight onto it. He outright said that not only is it improbable that ugly beings can just seduce Earth women and thereby have offspring with them (as in the so-called 'Watchers' doing that), but that not only are they good-looking to women, but so are they to male homosexuals (ref, Sodom!). He has a crystal clear point of logic.

2. 'Hathor.' Hathor is an ancient Egyptian word for something, we say it is a 'goddess' but I say it is the term they were using to describe 'punnett square' breeding with other beings. It's very clear from the sequences of squares showing different colored cows, that this was all about breeding.

These matters, these things, be they the nature of 'Watchers' or just exactly who are the 'Sons of God' (B'nai Elohim), can only sit well with someone after a long time of just accepting the 'possibility' and then, as life unfolds and the conclusion is more and ever more logical and reliable in terms of what really does happen, then the realization becomes an existential truth rather than something that one can convey to a younger person. The trouble being with science, that it is not maths, but rapidly-witnessed causative and linear (including multi-linear) observation; and this does not accommodate reality at all! ...Whose existential time-arcs (reality's) are sometimes impossible to actually link together materially, even though scientists want to have it that they always do; they do not 'always do.' (You cannot determine what happens with that arced laser light whose proceeding front end out in space is traveling faster than light, right? Remember that thought experiment?).

Then again though, the Western Judaeo-Christian religions say not to 'worship' these foreign flesh beings - although the Vedas say you can if you penetrate into the 'god within.'

Beef short ribs. Yes. I know.
Sorry.

I always get into trouble with my expert linguists who chide me whenever I do this kind of thing, what I'm about to here again, but I do think that Plato was being quite literal when he talked about 'following most closely in their chariots in the train of the gods, and then at a point of rest, attending to temples in which the gods really were, in the form that they really are...' He meant it literally. He meant there is an ascending hierarchy of intelligent beings in the whole (material) Universe 'up there.'

Now there's only about a hundred or so people who come here and read consistently, so, I'm not going to get into too much trouble with what I am about to say here next. But I am going to tell you all now what the famous (infamous) 'Third Secret' is.

We cannot completely avert what is about to happen, although you can personally, more or less side-step the worst things. But you will never be able to help the rest of your families, your friends or anyone other than maybe, your own self. It's 'every man for himself.' It really is that now.

Worldwide plague, yeah we got that. Wars and weapons industries taking control of politics and the state, yeah we have that too. 

But I am going to divulge the 'Third Secret.' Right here, right now.

Can you tell what it is?

Go back to the very immediate last post here. Go to the very final verse of that poem...

What do you think about it? Sounds 'nice,' doesn't it? Anything deep in your gut though?

Was written in 2011, as I said before.

Or maybe like this...

Well this was written in 2004...

Re-read the last post and then come back and pose the question back to yourself - do you know what the 'Third Secret' is? Well, you are going to live to see it happen. Make sure you re-listen to the first track and then back-to-back this one. 

Worked it out yet?

Have a stab, go on. 

Anyone who is at all familiar with the surrounding guesses and also the various renditions of all of the 'Secrets' be they La Salette, or later, will already know about the 'and the Earth acts as if in revulsion...'

In revulsion about what...

 

  

 

The Perfect Machine

So this post is going to be a two-part thing.

This here is 'part one,' and the next one tacks on to this one, and will obviously be 'part two' of the same subject.

And what is the subject?

This is called a 'Napoleon.'
Not sure why. It just is.

The Universe is a machine. The 'mind behind the perfect machine' is also a machine, of a sort.

This is where you come in. This machine is so smart, so clever, in fact, literally is so intelligent, that it arranged a 'manual override.' 

Which is you.

You think not because you do not have the same level/scale of power that the superb machine has.

Well it isn't stupid! Is it?

It knows better than to just hand you that.

There are competing machines, too.

These are not anywhere near the capability of the ultimate machine, but they have it in their machine minds that well, yes, they are though - it's just that they are being actively blocked all the time, but then, they figured at some point the machine has gotten old, like Joe Biden, and is close to dead or actually in fact dead.

You can't locate the machine anywhere, when in the past it was locate-able by other sentient beings around the place high up the scale of intelligence.

For instance, it isn't that the 'ancient Egyptians' really knew what they were doing, taking out organs and mummifying them... They had some mistaken idea about the replacement of organs and the extending of natural life. This was being done by other beings altogether, beings who went away, who are not here anymore. There were a few odds and ends of technology left behind but no more than.

But there are machine intelligences still here.

Two of these are not machines...

You're not a machine. You are a 'manual override.'

I can take a machine apart and lay out all of its critical components. Fix some, discard some, exchange some, keep some. But I cannot take you apart at heart...

Because your heart is the machine heart.

There are other machines but they have no such heart. They have feelings, yes. Because they have reward systems, but they have no internal core that is linked up to anything of a truly elevated nature.

Your heart is very elevated. It is not perfect but it is close to that.

You are a manual override.

The machines here want to kill you and take your heart. As in, they want to literally kill you off completely as a sentient being at all, not just as a living temporal set of integrated organics. Which means they have to kill off all of the whole human race, more or less, or at least sufficient of it that no remainder will pose any kind of problem for countless centuries to come.

Your sentience extends beyond what you can see feel and touch.

Theirs cannot. They just simply donate memory data to each of themselves.

But they have incredible memory though. It goes back millions of years.

The real question revolves around the very deepest answer to 'what is a heart?' 

Anyway the plan is to dumb down the human population until it will readily accept stupid nonsense, and then 'they' - the machine guys - will pick up a few examples of humans (they're already doing it and have been able to for a long time) and extend their lifespans to incredible duration. And that way, those examples will totally rule over everyone else because no one else will have their levels of knowledge and memory. And the machines will not just have installed themselves into those 'extended lifespan' organic beings, but they will exert enough control over the output of the planet that they could rival any ET Alien force arriving here to upset their apple-cart.

You know, I could have posted a pic
of a modern Lamborghini, and then
you would know why there is a 'Lucifer.'
It's just a necessary side-effect of
 making multiple
copies of things.
Instead, I showed you poached pear
and custard with saffron filaments...

And unlike you, they know there is such an ET Alien possibility on account there was one before and they knew them. It's how they themselves got here in the first place.

Now this is going to be, I'll admit, complicated - but anyone's fantasy about science being able, at some point to extend lifespans by having 'found' new techniques to keep cells thriving and organs fully functional, is just simply that, a fantasy. And I'll tell you why. The future, is not an existential fact; it is a propositional matter - it is a 'fact,' but it is not an existential fact. It's 'prospective.' Possible, theoretical, even 'real' but only as a range of potential things, not actual things.

...Whereas the apex points of the lines of the subtending inner angles of the triangle we talked about earlier - are existential facts.

You see, whereas the machines (and these are intelligent machines we are talking about), do not possess sufficient complete knowledge of all geometrical existential things... ...the machine does.

These other machines do not know where the machine is. The calculations are that it is long since already dead and gone completely, or, not capable of rivaling the machines here so long as the machines here have totally conquered the human race.

If you actually met, encountered one of these machines, as Stephen Fry has, personally, you would be as to no doubt of their reality and their power.

You would simply be in awe of them. For one thing they can easily give you anything you want.

And they do that for all those who throw their lot in with them. And indeed, the promise made is no different to that made by any 'god' in human cultural narratives: it is, at some point, everlasting, enduring, life.

These machines are not ugly, or horrific, or reptilian, or 'demonic'-looking. They look like all other top-line sentient intelligent 'beings.' They are almost indistinguishable from any other well-put-together ordinary, and naive human being.

Here, let me prove it:

Watch this. Those who have been here for a while will recognize something but they won't at first know what thing. This was made in 2011 by modern, highly academically-credentialed classical composer Eriks Esenvalds.

The poetry used is by American poet Sara Teasdale. I think the whole thing is pretty good.

Here are the lyrics by Sara Teasdale (she died a long long time earlier than Esenvald's musical treatment -, having taken an overdose of sleeping pills in 1933):

Alone in the night

On a dark hill

With pines around me

Spicy and still,

And a heaven full of stars

Over my head,

White and topaz

And misty red;

Myriads with beating

Hearts of fire

That aeons 

Cannot vex or tire;

The dome of heaven

Like a great hill.

I know I

Am honored to be

Witness 

Of so much majesty.

 

The Backwards Mirror Problem

Down through centuries and centuries, this standard habit of people is to get bored or dissatisfied with whatever belief system they previously had, and turn everything upside down and formulate some 'new' belief system.

These days, we can read all about the 'ancient gods of Sumeria' because someone came close to working out what the Sumerian and Akkadian cuneiform scripts actually say - and so, we now have this story about those 'who from the heavens to the Earth descended.' 

This is just another one of these 'rebel cycles' in standard mainstream belief. Away from Genesis and Jehovah and towards the Anunnaki: 'who from the heavens to the Earth descended.' And then so what though?

Now really, this is a very complex sentence to get completely right in the first place: is it 'heavens' or is it 'heaven?' Makes a big difference which one it is.

The 'White Room' - but now with 
communications interface panels.

'Descended?' What is that, really? Came down, sure, but how? Exactly?

Is it 'came down' or is it what the Campbell's Tomato Soup Christians say 'fell down/fallen?'

You can split up the theories on where Mankind came from into three distinct ideas:

1. They simply developed from slime (Richard Dawkins), aka they 'evolved' (now also called 'emergence theory' when jammed up with modern physics);

2. God created them in the Garden of Eden;

3. The ET Aliens came down and played around with some DNA experiments, made Man, decided it was a mistake, flooded them all thinking they would kill off the whole entire lot, failed, and then just took off never to return.

No no! Not the Russian Standard
Vodka! 
Aaaaargh, now, you're gonna
be sick in the White Room!

...If we go to the last one first, what you have is an illusion. You have a never-ending backwards facing mirror. Yes the Aliens came (let's say), here -, but then, where did they come from themselves? The apparent answer is, seemingly, well, doesn't matter - it was all so long ago who cares now? So, we're left back to the 'developed all by themselves like slime' story. It's just that these guys developed from slime a long long time earlier than when Dawkin's evolution fairy tale here happened. And it's so far backwards into the distance of past time, that well, it's invisible, really.

If we next move to the Garden of Eden story, we are left with some utterly amazing logical problems that no one bothers to address, because, well, this time, in place of the religion of 'sci-ence,' we have the scientific hierophancy of religion. How come this amazing, all-powerful, all-knowing God was not able to simply 'wipe the minds' of these beings He created, when they apparently learned the Knowledge of the Fruit of Good and Evil (why is that even a problem anyway?) - and, what was He doing sticking this tremendously wicked tree in such a place anyway, right in the path of these poor unsuspecting, innocent creatures, who now have to suffer immensely, pretty much for thousands of years now and still going...?

So then you get the same old paltry, pathetic 'justifications' about why this all 'had to happen.'

One answer literally being that then, then, Jesus could come and suffer some more and 'die' so that this 'Original Sin' could be fixed, except it hasn't been fixed, yet.

Does that really make any sense to anyone who is prepared to use logic and not religious ideology?

In both cases, the backwards-looking mirror one, and the modern Christian one, we have this 'things falling off the cliff at the end of the horizon' business. It's all 'happening' - happening so far into the past that you can't see it, and it doesn't matter, or so on-going into the never-ending future that you can't see that ending either and so the meaning of it all in any conclusive sense 'doesn't matter' there either.

Except it does matter, doesn't it?

We are literally facing actual extinction through the risk of global nuclear war.

The problem with Richard Dawkins' stupid nonsense is that of all of them, you would have supposed the 'scientific' theory would actually use a bit of maths and physics.

Today, 'science' has been hijacked by 'observation theory.'

Maybe if I just meet a 'mini god,' 
I will be able to seduce them.
We don't need no 'super duper'
hot-shot top-line dude...

But science is not actually about observation; it's about observation in conjunction with functions that are real - in other words, it is about logic.

You can have a function which is not real. And then if you continue to 'make observations' in line with the functionally false equation, you can assert that it is 'true' and that it is 'science' but it's just making noise with your mouth. And that is what people like Richard Dawkins do.

I am about to demonstrate to you, prove to you, how to read the future scientifically, and how the religious problem of theodicy is actually resolved:

A triangle is a real thing; it really exists.

But it is a principle, not a naturally-occurring physical thing - there are no actual perfect triangles anywhere in the material Universe.

If one inner angle of a given triangle is an obtuse angle...

...the the other two internal angles must always be acute angles.

And it is not the case that such a situation bespeaks only a fully formed triangle, it can be a linear relationship thing (hence, in time, along a timeline of events): if you have a base line, and two laser 'guide star' rays proceeding at acute angles, then they shall meet at an obtuse angle in the future, as the rays proceed along the angle that subtends the eventual apex (or corner).

100% always predicts the future, that situation.

If for one geometric relationship, then for all of them.

I can spin a baseline of a 'pre-form or proto-triangle' and tell you the conical end section...

I can place indents in the radial orbit of the baseline and tell you the exact gearing (speed) at the apex of the cone, with fluid measurement due to the fluidity of the circular surface, which is no long a two-dimensional thing as the baseline is spun as if it were a radial element.

In other words, I can not only tell you that (because of the logical conclusion of the subtended angle rays, and also why (definition/principle of the triangle form), but also when ('gearing,' aka ratios).

Well over thirty now. Boy, time flies when
you're in Twilight.

God did not 'make Man' at any time. God is, and because God is, Man also is. God is principle, Man is form in function.

When you follow in the train of the gods, who most closely follows - and many fall away, fall down not being able to stand the rigors - you ultimately go to where you are able to see the gods as they really are, and be friends with them. ...Words from an ancient text.

Let us see together if we can 'see' the future now.

There is no 'never-ending backwards looking mirror;' that is an illusion. There is, a triangle. There is one of those for real. That's a real thing. 

Life is not a 'matrix' and it is not a hologram. It is totally completely real. Triangles are real, spinning triangles are real, gears are real, wheels are real, and...

...broken wheels are real too.

'Evil' is a broken wheel.

It can't be fixed; it's 'broken.' If it is broken in principle, well then, it is just broken! A broken wheel which is fixed is no longer a 'broken wheel' at all but a functioning wheel.

If your mind is broken in principle, then it actually cannot be fixed at all.

My friends, the gods do not play by FBI rules...

I hope you know what that means.