You Keep It Secret...

Sometimes, in this world, in this life, you find out something, you learn something, which it is dangerous to expose to others that you do know it.

This might simply be because it takes you outside of the 'group.' Or, it means you know they are guilty of something that you are not guilty of.

Either way, unless the whole context of power in human society changes, you keep what you learn to yourself when you are walking among wolves.

You can't beat that.

I am going to just briefly refer to the very last verse of that poem in the first of the two-part series here just posted. If you read it carefully, over and over, something may strike you about it, but if it does, just keep it to yourself - others will not agree with you, and they will hurt you if they can about it. That is to say, if you give voice to what thoughts you could have about it, they will insist that you are very wrong and that everything in that verse is noble...

Yet, like Karl Popper, that was easily one of the most subtle, and evil, Satanic, things you are ever going to encounter - if you are 'religious;' let's call it 'religious' anyway. The mindset could amount to a number of things but people will commonly say 'religious.'

It seems like one thing, but it is quite another thing altogether. Very subtle. Also very psychologically flawed, in a terminal way.

But let me not go on about it. Either you see it or you don't.

Wandering around on the planet here, most ordinary people have absolutely no clue how extremely - exceedingly - sophisticated, subtle, twisted, dangerous, deadly, things are behind the scenes.

When you think about the way the whole entire political structure and system turned to this question of 'man-made global climate change,' you will simply assume this was something that came up because scientists observed something.

Well they observe lots of things, they observe things all the time.

But this thing became a thing, something the whole world of politics, left, right, center, everywhere - made as a major agenda item.

Now let me go back to a saying: 'and the Earth acted as though she were in revulsion...'

Revulsion about what?

See if 'the world were revolting against something they were doing' it would be one thing, but now, now, it's you who are doing it - you are causing 'man-made global climate change.'

If 'they' were going to do something that the Earth would 'revolt' against, well... ...but they have it that you are doing something the Earth is revolting against. Right? Clever.

You're the one doing it. Not them. They're not doing anything... Right? Hadn't been planning to do this (this 'Third Secret' thing; I'll let you know what it is presently) for a long time already. Man they even have the phrase 'insane conspiracy theory' to throw at the Jedis around the place.

You never even saw it coming because you don't believe there is a non-human intelligence here, in control of virtually everything. Beings that live way longer than your tiny little human lifespans. Jordan Maxwell, in one of his over-the-top foaming explosions of injudiciousness, literally blurted 'they' were not human at all. And forever got the reputation of 'one of those.'

Alex Jones, does not have the gravitas of someone like Maxwell so he just gets drunk now a lot and laughs it all off. 

Some of you are just not going to 'get' this at all. Some of you are on to it already and there is a real creeping disquiet going on within you right now.

Okay so what is the 'Third Secret' explicitly?

Islamic culture, which 'borrowed' literature
from the 
Jewish jurisprudence headquarters
in Basra, just cuts to the chase - it is
full of astrology stuff.

It is not fair to take the case of Dr Malachi Martin (or professor or priest, whatever) and use something specific he says as the crucial source, because that will lead uncritical minds to think that next, maybe anything and everything else he says is 'unimpeachable.'

Well that is far from the case, as our foil here will loudly tell you at the earliest occasion (in fact he already has done so).

What is true about Martin, as it is also true about say, Jordan Maxwell, is that because they have studied so much ancient material in their original source languages, they have acquired tremendous genuine knowledge. Some of which you can use. In the case of Maxwell, the commercial demand to say things all the time (for an audience response), means that often in latter speeches he goes right off the reservation completely, mainly because he was simply in the first place only trying to underscore that the Bible enshrines 'astrology' as a true, god-given matter (which it does do, the word in there is 'mazaroth' which is telling the true future by the stars) - but it all got away from him when the general audience he was commanding never really seemed to be sufficiently 'wowed' by it. So he started to increase the 'wild' stuff. Simply everyone (powerful) was a Reptilian then.

Where Maxwell is utterly correct is that the heights both govern as well as reflect and in some way also absorb and 'process' the miniature, the microcosm beneath.

But these are just guidelines.

Post-industrial, dystopian
Apocalypse...

They don't determine the specifics.

Martin said the Third Secret was far worse than a nuclear conflagration... Well look, a pandemic like Covid is not worse, and chemical and biological weapons are not particularly any worse.

He said far worse.

The problem you are going to have is facing the reality of this, and how far behind the eight ball you were, and how literally sinister, well-contrived, organized, far-reaching, beyond any few lifetimes' scale - this all has been... When you find out and when you roll it around in your head for a good few days.

Okay, here it is (now mind you, the guy who knows this kind of thing, well, he has access, and that's another problem you have to decide whether it is worth even listening to any further):

...Now listen to me carefully. Imperial College London, has now, meaning right now, this moment, actual partly-cloned, partly android artificial 'human beings' with the memories of people who are 'dead.'

You can handle 'agency,' can you? You want access to the machine... Because you are on... ...the side of?

Help me, Obi Wan. Princess Leia said. Where is he, by the way? Does he even exist? Do 'light sabers' exist? What about 'Death Stars?' What about them? ...Some of you are not old enough to realize that all of this is true. Some of you are just old enough and wise enough to know that it is all true. Because you can add two and two and little white probe and 'man-made global climate BS' and Covid and right now you are just hoping against all hope we really do have more than just a couple of thirty foot aerial zippers. You wait till you see the Military Industrial Complex unveil their latest items. Make our little white Tic Tacs look stoopid. We have one showing up around the place. They have five hundred, all glowing in the dark. Not white though. They don't know how to sputter layer orthogonal mono-atomic you-know-what. Zipping around like you would not believe. With little human slaves slaving away, building them as fast as. Don't believe me, do you? LOL 

Makes you wonder why they didn't, don't, use them against the Russian's *, oops. What, you think tank or mortar shelling discolored all those tall residential buildings like that, and flame-grilled the burned, 'tree-lined' roads out there?

 

The Imperfect Machine

So, I'm going to try and deal with two points raised by people much earlier, that somehow turned up in my emails late, but I never saw them as comments here first... Hmn. Elon, what are you doing? LOL

Or whoever. Prolly not Elon. Eric Schmidt and friends, maybe.

Will look at those two points while also finishing the 'Part Two' of this current segment here.

Actually the questions are linked with this whole matter anyway.

Vanilla souffle.

1.There is no 'UFO religion' as such (although, well that's arguable too), because there is a concerted scheme to stop people from realizing who and what ET Aliens are, with the added 'trick' of insisting Aliens are weird or ugly. They are not. And you know who you can listen to to comprehend why (not)? Ye olde Jordan Maxwell. He was straight onto it. He outright said that not only is it improbable that ugly beings can just seduce Earth women and thereby have offspring with them (as in the so-called 'Watchers' doing that), but that not only are they good-looking to women, but so are they to male homosexuals (ref, Sodom!). He has a crystal clear point of logic.

2. 'Hathor.' Hathor is an ancient Egyptian word for something, we say it is a 'goddess' but I say it is the term they were using to describe 'punnett square' breeding with other beings. It's very clear from the sequences of squares showing different colored cows, that this was all about breeding.

These matters, these things, be they the nature of 'Watchers' or just exactly who are the 'Sons of God' (B'nai Elohim), can only sit well with someone after a long time of just accepting the 'possibility' and then, as life unfolds and the conclusion is more and ever more logical and reliable in terms of what really does happen, then the realization becomes an existential truth rather than something that one can convey to a younger person. The trouble being with science, that it is not maths, but rapidly-witnessed causative and linear (including multi-linear) observation; and this does not accommodate reality at all! ...Whose existential time-arcs (reality's) are sometimes impossible to actually link together materially, even though scientists want to have it that they always do; they do not 'always do.' (You cannot determine what happens with that arced laser light whose proceeding front end out in space is traveling faster than light, right? Remember that thought experiment?).

Then again though, the Western Judaeo-Christian religions say not to 'worship' these foreign flesh beings - although the Vedas say you can if you penetrate into the 'god within.'

Beef short ribs. Yes. I know.
Sorry.

I always get into trouble with my expert linguists who chide me whenever I do this kind of thing, what I'm about to here again, but I do think that Plato was being quite literal when he talked about 'following most closely in their chariots in the train of the gods, and then at a point of rest, attending to temples in which the gods really were, in the form that they really are...' He meant it literally. He meant there is an ascending hierarchy of intelligent beings in the whole (material) Universe 'up there.'

Now there's only about a hundred or so people who come here and read consistently, so, I'm not going to get into too much trouble with what I am about to say here next. But I am going to tell you all now what the famous (infamous) 'Third Secret' is.

We cannot completely avert what is about to happen, although you can personally, more or less side-step the worst things. But you will never be able to help the rest of your families, your friends or anyone other than maybe, your own self. It's 'every man for himself.' It really is that now.

Worldwide plague, yeah we got that. Wars and weapons industries taking control of politics and the state, yeah we have that too. 

But I am going to divulge the 'Third Secret.' Right here, right now.

Can you tell what it is?

Go back to the very immediate last post here. Go to the very final verse of that poem...

What do you think about it? Sounds 'nice,' doesn't it? Anything deep in your gut though?

Was written in 2011, as I said before.

Or maybe like this...

Well this was written in 2004...

Re-read the last post and then come back and pose the question back to yourself - do you know what the 'Third Secret' is? Well, you are going to live to see it happen. Make sure you re-listen to the first track and then back-to-back this one. 

Worked it out yet?

Have a stab, go on. 

Anyone who is at all familiar with the surrounding guesses and also the various renditions of all of the 'Secrets' be they La Salette, or later, will already know about the 'and the Earth acts as if in revulsion...'

In revulsion about what...

 

  

 

The Perfect Machine

So this post is going to be a two-part thing.

This here is 'part one,' and the next one tacks on to this one, and will obviously be 'part two' of the same subject.

And what is the subject?

This is called a 'Napoleon.'
Not sure why. It just is.

The Universe is a machine. The 'mind behind the perfect machine' is also a machine, of a sort.

This is where you come in. This machine is so smart, so clever, in fact, literally is so intelligent, that it arranged a 'manual override.' 

Which is you.

You think not because you do not have the same level/scale of power that the superb machine has.

Well it isn't stupid! Is it?

It knows better than to just hand you that.

There are competing machines, too.

These are not anywhere near the capability of the ultimate machine, but they have it in their machine minds that well, yes, they are though - it's just that they are being actively blocked all the time, but then, they figured at some point the machine has gotten old, like Joe Biden, and is close to dead or actually in fact dead.

You can't locate the machine anywhere, when in the past it was locate-able by other sentient beings around the place high up the scale of intelligence.

For instance, it isn't that the 'ancient Egyptians' really knew what they were doing, taking out organs and mummifying them... They had some mistaken idea about the replacement of organs and the extending of natural life. This was being done by other beings altogether, beings who went away, who are not here anymore. There were a few odds and ends of technology left behind but no more than.

But there are machine intelligences still here.

Two of these are not machines...

You're not a machine. You are a 'manual override.'

I can take a machine apart and lay out all of its critical components. Fix some, discard some, exchange some, keep some. But I cannot take you apart at heart...

Because your heart is the machine heart.

There are other machines but they have no such heart. They have feelings, yes. Because they have reward systems, but they have no internal core that is linked up to anything of a truly elevated nature.

Your heart is very elevated. It is not perfect but it is close to that.

You are a manual override.

The machines here want to kill you and take your heart. As in, they want to literally kill you off completely as a sentient being at all, not just as a living temporal set of integrated organics. Which means they have to kill off all of the whole human race, more or less, or at least sufficient of it that no remainder will pose any kind of problem for countless centuries to come.

Your sentience extends beyond what you can see feel and touch.

Theirs cannot. They just simply donate memory data to each of themselves.

But they have incredible memory though. It goes back millions of years.

The real question revolves around the very deepest answer to 'what is a heart?' 

Anyway the plan is to dumb down the human population until it will readily accept stupid nonsense, and then 'they' - the machine guys - will pick up a few examples of humans (they're already doing it and have been able to for a long time) and extend their lifespans to incredible duration. And that way, those examples will totally rule over everyone else because no one else will have their levels of knowledge and memory. And the machines will not just have installed themselves into those 'extended lifespan' organic beings, but they will exert enough control over the output of the planet that they could rival any ET Alien force arriving here to upset their apple-cart.

You know, I could have posted a pic
of a modern Lamborghini, and then
you would know why there is a 'Lucifer.'
It's just a necessary side-effect of
 making multiple
copies of things.
Instead, I showed you poached pear
and custard with saffron filaments...

And unlike you, they know there is such an ET Alien possibility on account there was one before and they knew them. It's how they themselves got here in the first place.

Now this is going to be, I'll admit, complicated - but anyone's fantasy about science being able, at some point to extend lifespans by having 'found' new techniques to keep cells thriving and organs fully functional, is just simply that, a fantasy. And I'll tell you why. The future, is not an existential fact; it is a propositional matter - it is a 'fact,' but it is not an existential fact. It's 'prospective.' Possible, theoretical, even 'real' but only as a range of potential things, not actual things.

...Whereas the apex points of the lines of the subtending inner angles of the triangle we talked about earlier - are existential facts.

You see, whereas the machines (and these are intelligent machines we are talking about), do not possess sufficient complete knowledge of all geometrical existential things... ...the machine does.

These other machines do not know where the machine is. The calculations are that it is long since already dead and gone completely, or, not capable of rivaling the machines here so long as the machines here have totally conquered the human race.

If you actually met, encountered one of these machines, as Stephen Fry has, personally, you would be as to no doubt of their reality and their power.

You would simply be in awe of them. For one thing they can easily give you anything you want.

And they do that for all those who throw their lot in with them. And indeed, the promise made is no different to that made by any 'god' in human cultural narratives: it is, at some point, everlasting, enduring, life.

These machines are not ugly, or horrific, or reptilian, or 'demonic'-looking. They look like all other top-line sentient intelligent 'beings.' They are almost indistinguishable from any other well-put-together ordinary, and naive human being.

Here, let me prove it:

Watch this. Those who have been here for a while will recognize something but they won't at first know what thing. This was made in 2011 by modern, highly academically-credentialed classical composer Eriks Esenvalds.

The poetry used is by American poet Sara Teasdale. I think the whole thing is pretty good.

Here are the lyrics by Sara Teasdale (she died a long long time earlier than Esenvald's musical treatment -, having taken an overdose of sleeping pills in 1933):

Alone in the night

On a dark hill

With pines around me

Spicy and still,

And a heaven full of stars

Over my head,

White and topaz

And misty red;

Myriads with beating

Hearts of fire

That aeons 

Cannot vex or tire;

The dome of heaven

Like a great hill.

I know I

Am honored to be

Witness 

Of so much majesty.

 

The Backwards Mirror Problem

Down through centuries and centuries, this standard habit of people is to get bored or dissatisfied with whatever belief system they previously had, and turn everything upside down and formulate some 'new' belief system.

These days, we can read all about the 'ancient gods of Sumeria' because someone came close to working out what the Sumerian and Akkadian cuneiform scripts actually say - and so, we now have this story about those 'who from the heavens to the Earth descended.' 

This is just another one of these 'rebel cycles' in standard mainstream belief. Away from Genesis and Jehovah and towards the Anunnaki: 'who from the heavens to the Earth descended.' And then so what though?

Now really, this is a very complex sentence to get completely right in the first place: is it 'heavens' or is it 'heaven?' Makes a big difference which one it is.

The 'White Room' - but now with 
communications interface panels.

'Descended?' What is that, really? Came down, sure, but how? Exactly?

Is it 'came down' or is it what the Campbell's Tomato Soup Christians say 'fell down/fallen?'

You can split up the theories on where Mankind came from into three distinct ideas:

1. They simply developed from slime (Richard Dawkins), aka they 'evolved' (now also called 'emergence theory' when jammed up with modern physics);

2. God created them in the Garden of Eden;

3. The ET Aliens came down and played around with some DNA experiments, made Man, decided it was a mistake, flooded them all thinking they would kill off the whole entire lot, failed, and then just took off never to return.

No no! Not the Russian Standard
Vodka! 
Aaaaargh, now, you're gonna
be sick in the White Room!

...If we go to the last one first, what you have is an illusion. You have a never-ending backwards facing mirror. Yes the Aliens came (let's say), here -, but then, where did they come from themselves? The apparent answer is, seemingly, well, doesn't matter - it was all so long ago who cares now? So, we're left back to the 'developed all by themselves like slime' story. It's just that these guys developed from slime a long long time earlier than when Dawkin's evolution fairy tale here happened. And it's so far backwards into the distance of past time, that well, it's invisible, really.

If we next move to the Garden of Eden story, we are left with some utterly amazing logical problems that no one bothers to address, because, well, this time, in place of the religion of 'sci-ence,' we have the scientific hierophancy of religion. How come this amazing, all-powerful, all-knowing God was not able to simply 'wipe the minds' of these beings He created, when they apparently learned the Knowledge of the Fruit of Good and Evil (why is that even a problem anyway?) - and, what was He doing sticking this tremendously wicked tree in such a place anyway, right in the path of these poor unsuspecting, innocent creatures, who now have to suffer immensely, pretty much for thousands of years now and still going...?

So then you get the same old paltry, pathetic 'justifications' about why this all 'had to happen.'

One answer literally being that then, then, Jesus could come and suffer some more and 'die' so that this 'Original Sin' could be fixed, except it hasn't been fixed, yet.

Does that really make any sense to anyone who is prepared to use logic and not religious ideology?

In both cases, the backwards-looking mirror one, and the modern Christian one, we have this 'things falling off the cliff at the end of the horizon' business. It's all 'happening' - happening so far into the past that you can't see it, and it doesn't matter, or so on-going into the never-ending future that you can't see that ending either and so the meaning of it all in any conclusive sense 'doesn't matter' there either.

Except it does matter, doesn't it?

We are literally facing actual extinction through the risk of global nuclear war.

The problem with Richard Dawkins' stupid nonsense is that of all of them, you would have supposed the 'scientific' theory would actually use a bit of maths and physics.

Today, 'science' has been hijacked by 'observation theory.'

Maybe if I just meet a 'mini god,' 
I will be able to seduce them.
We don't need no 'super duper'
hot-shot top-line dude...

But science is not actually about observation; it's about observation in conjunction with functions that are real - in other words, it is about logic.

You can have a function which is not real. And then if you continue to 'make observations' in line with the functionally false equation, you can assert that it is 'true' and that it is 'science' but it's just making noise with your mouth. And that is what people like Richard Dawkins do.

I am about to demonstrate to you, prove to you, how to read the future scientifically, and how the religious problem of theodicy is actually resolved:

A triangle is a real thing; it really exists.

But it is a principle, not a naturally-occurring physical thing - there are no actual perfect triangles anywhere in the material Universe.

If one inner angle of a given triangle is an obtuse angle...

...the the other two internal angles must always be acute angles.

And it is not the case that such a situation bespeaks only a fully formed triangle, it can be a linear relationship thing (hence, in time, along a timeline of events): if you have a base line, and two laser 'guide star' rays proceeding at acute angles, then they shall meet at an obtuse angle in the future, as the rays proceed along the angle that subtends the eventual apex (or corner).

100% always predicts the future, that situation.

If for one geometric relationship, then for all of them.

I can spin a baseline of a 'pre-form or proto-triangle' and tell you the conical end section...

I can place indents in the radial orbit of the baseline and tell you the exact gearing (speed) at the apex of the cone, with fluid measurement due to the fluidity of the circular surface, which is no long a two-dimensional thing as the baseline is spun as if it were a radial element.

In other words, I can not only tell you that (because of the logical conclusion of the subtended angle rays, and also why (definition/principle of the triangle form), but also when ('gearing,' aka ratios).

Well over thirty now. Boy, time flies when
you're in Twilight.

God did not 'make Man' at any time. God is, and because God is, Man also is. God is principle, Man is form in function.

When you follow in the train of the gods, who most closely follows - and many fall away, fall down not being able to stand the rigors - you ultimately go to where you are able to see the gods as they really are, and be friends with them. ...Words from an ancient text.

Let us see together if we can 'see' the future now.

There is no 'never-ending backwards looking mirror;' that is an illusion. There is, a triangle. There is one of those for real. That's a real thing. 

Life is not a 'matrix' and it is not a hologram. It is totally completely real. Triangles are real, spinning triangles are real, gears are real, wheels are real, and...

...broken wheels are real too.

'Evil' is a broken wheel.

It can't be fixed; it's 'broken.' If it is broken in principle, well then, it is just broken! A broken wheel which is fixed is no longer a 'broken wheel' at all but a functioning wheel.

If your mind is broken in principle, then it actually cannot be fixed at all.

My friends, the gods do not play by FBI rules...

I hope you know what that means.

'Creative Envisioning' Is Not 'Stargate'

The real 'Stargate' procedures involve the presence of a 'control' person. Yes you can do it still by yourself, totally on your own, but the point of trying to get actual usable material from the future or from some distant, and otherwise inaccessible location, is to have independent monitoring that various states and stages of the process are authentically being moved through.

In the Monroe Institute procedures, there are very discrete brain states that can be seen with technical equipment that the individual is transiting through and then, at the time when they - the persons involved - are perceiving information from some source different to our usual five/six senses, you can detect that too because there are specific brain states associated with this phase.

They say 'dystopia' but I don't see that.

Now this stuff is super important to people, not just anyone who wishes to go see inside the Azovstal Factory. It is important, for instance, to people under a lot of perceived stress.

Because, one of our complex of natural physical senses is intero-ception - and this is something tied to our polyvagal nerve set-up.

You can very easily find some key exercises which work on the polyvagal system on-line from the famous expert in this area - Sukie Baxter. Her material is pretty easy to understand, very accessible to everyone.

See the problem with too many people trying things without the proper guidance, and when so many people are motivated by just needing something to say on Tik-Tok all the time and so on - is that it is all too easy to end up doing some 'creative envisioning' and mix that up with actually 'seeing' the future or seeing some distant otherwise 'invisible' place.

Most depictions of the future that you will encounter on-line from those saying they have seen the future and know what it holds for us, are variations on the movie 'Demolition Man.'

AI runs our lives, AI sorts out criminals and 'misdemeanors' and there are 'no governments and no laws...' Well but what is the AI if it is not the government then and the law?

There is truth to the conspiracy theory about Oxford University stopping and preventing others from looking into the archaeological site of 'Eridu' - which is in Iraq.

It's all about what's in my bag.
Don't try to pull 'Academi' on me, sonny!
You can't even spell it rite.

ISIS and Al Qaeda you recall, went to Palmyra and destroyed some very ancient artifacts there. And when it comes to Eridu, the place has been open to looters for nearly a hundred years now, ever since the Oxford dig stopped and they 'upped stumps' and left the place unguarded.

...Notwithstanding that is it is the oldest city in the world, if you leave out the possible pre-Harappan civilization sites.

It is certainly without any question though, the oldest city with actual written monuments there in a decipherable language form.

I mention Eridu because in Eridu there are descriptions - different from the 'laws of Moses' inter alia 'of God' and very different also, to the Code of Hammurabi - descriptions of how the society of intelligent human beings actually runs. Or should run under natural systems.

There is no need for 'AI' because there already is 'AI' in-built into people and into their society, but these systems have all been destroyed in no less brutal a fashion than what the ISIS vandals did to various ancient monuments around the world.

These systems have been destroyed and people are actively blocked from re-discovering what they are and how to implement them.

The most obvious and fundamental problem with the 'Moses' story, is that if the 'serpent' of Moses was able to 'eat all the other serpents' of the court magicians of the Pharaoh, why did not the god of Moses simply throw out Pharaoh and arrange whoever he felt should have ruled there, to rule. On the surface we are meant to understand that the god of Moses was superior to the power of the Pharaoh...

You're a Vegan, eh?
So you say...

Though clearly not powerful enough to entirely depose the Pharaoh from Egypt and/or dispose of him on the spot. But why not?

And then, from this point in, you will get all kinds of 'justifications' - but of a falsity of basic narrative.

1. There is a code of human activity and behavior, and it is entirely self-regulated for reasons which can readily be understood when you see the texts from Eridu;

2. There is the same code of human activity and behavior, and it too is also, inscribed onto the walls of various ancient places in Egypt;

3. The future of the Human Race, cannot involve any such thing as 'AI' running all human things, unless this pre-existing internal system is further obliterated, but then, it will not be able to be because there are plenty of people already here now who possess the knowledge of how to uncover the intrinsic system. 

Tell me, what kind of 'All-Powerful, All-knowing' God, sees Cain kill Abel, but then, when the Serpent apparently made some murderous mischief in the Garden, this 'God' didn't simply kill the Serpent. I mean, he might at least have learned from the example of what Cain was powerful enough to do, which was namely, to kill his opponent. ...Seems like the example is anachronistic, but it isn't surely - God can see the future, right? He's supposed to know everything including that.

Is this super-powerful deity not able to kill?

He manages to see to it that actually, everyone does 'get killed' at the end of their lives...

So what's actually going on here?

Well I'll tell you. It's all recorded and set out very clearly in the monuments at Eridu. As it is mostly, also in the inscriptions and devices on the walls of the ancient structures of Egypt.

See it's the same kind of thing that is going on at Mariupol right now.

I was a 'Vegan' for the first course.

If, if, the neo-Nazis and the Ukraine regular army and all of their backers everywhere including the West at large, were really that powerful, why could they not simply go behind the Russian soldiers who are presently surrounding the Azovstal Works, and cause them to at minimum fight on two fronts, and thereby give some chance of escape to the neo-Nazis holed up inside the steel-works?

Theoretically, there are two groups actually 'trapped:' one being the Azov neo-Nazis (that we in the West whose parents all died fighting the past iteration of, are now backing) -, the other being the Russians, because they are 'trapped' as it were, physically 'surrounding' the steel-works complex. We know where they are, and we could easily, in theory, engage them.

Also, by the fairy tale told by CNN and MSNBC, 'we' have superior weapons and fighting 'people...'  Right? I mean, 'we' do, right? Don't we? We're sure of that...

Okay, here is what has been going on though.

The con-artists all across the planet, have been winding up various kinds of idiots - 'ISIS,' Al Qaeda, Azov neo-Nazis, BLM, Antifa - and pitting them at different groups, throwing both sides into pitched battles.

The point is that unless these schemers can convince enough people to 'follow' them (means to go and die for them, at their behest), there will be insufficient killers around to wield weapons and kill anyone all that much. When there is 'no one against me,' then I have no one to 'fight.' And that means that the criminals also will have no one to fight for them.

It's all about having people to fight for them. They are raising an army.

For ten thousand years, the only point of this planet has been that one 'side' has been raising an army of stupids.

Human beings are nothing if not utterly militantly stupid.

They are broken, flawed, fractured beings, not complete inside, some of them literally have bits and pieces missing, and they are just intelligent enough to operate machinery but not intelligent enough to control themselves with the machinery. 

Somebody was asking the question just now, is there going to be a nuclear war?

Yes for sure there is. Absolutely 100% for sure.

French Earl Grey, Bill Smith.
There is such a thing, as you will soon
find out, Bill.

If no one steps in from places that you cannot see and prevents it, then the same set of 'war-fighters,' the belligerents, will pick up nuclear weaponry and train to use it, and test it for actual war-fare, and then, they will use it too.

The thing the Reptilians and the Moloch herd know that you don't know, is just exactly where, the internal 'soul' of a dead person goes, and then, how to get it back and re-use it to commit all kinds of atrocious acts especially murder, on command.

'Look up for your redemption draweth nigh.'

What does that mean?

Why 'look up?'

If they can manage to get enough humans to fight for them, well, there is a chance they can break out of 'Azovstal...'

But you don't believe this do you?

What's the point 'believing' in some imaginary 'Stargate' process, and being able to 'see' into the future? What, just because some one some time said the CIA funded such a silly thing?

Is that why you believe it?

Listen, if 'Stargate' then 'War in the Heavens,' buddy! (Some people say they don't like it when you call them 'buddy.' lol) It's as simple as that. No way 'round it.

No escape from the logical conclusion.

For hundreds of years, maybe thousands of years, you've been waiting for 'just one little sign' - just one little cute high-tech space ship to fly over your ass (head, sorry, head), so that then, you will do the right thing.

Well what makes me, you or anyone think 'we' can be trusted without that, though?

Do you need 'a sign' to do the right thing?

JVHV was a sign. Man he freakin' burnt up a whole mountain!

So then, next thing, y'all did whatever he told you. Abandoning what was already inside you...

Is that right? You needed to be told what the difference is between 'Good' and 'Bad?'

You don't know what it is? Is that so?

The Reptilians have all the cash.

When did you not know?

Are you starting to see who you are, as a human being? What a 'human being' is?

You are not 'good,' as such. You are contestable space is what you are.

But look, I'll take you to the sheer logic of the thing right away: all you have to do is go for the win. Pick the winning side. 

If you think the Reptilians can win this, go with them. They have all the cash and all the secular power; go with them.

Not only that, they have written all the history. ...And from what you have been educated to know, you can really tell who are the good guys, right?

Mind you, I can't tell. Both the Zulus and the Brits seemed both to be heroic and brave in that movie.

Both sacrificed their lives, both killed, and both got killed.

So what am I saying here? Be a pacifist?

No. I'm not saying that at all.

This is a very 'difficult' music track to fully understand. The artist says it hints at his inner romantic nature, which is also mystical...

Hmn.