The Crisis Of Villainy

As soon as someone is cast in the role of a major movie 'villain's' part, or they actually end up playing the character in the movie - whatever movie it is - forever they are 'type-cast' as bad and as evil.

All film-goers (even myself included!), are 'credulous' always in a sense, because we deliberately choose to 'suspend the bridge of disbelief' as soon as we enter the cinema.

Yet, even so, we do still carry into the movie house with us our own actual personal life's context - the whole audience does do that - and so in a sociological sense, our credulity extends only insofar as certain functional internal story elements go; it does not extend past that into completely false ideas about the societies in which we live.

Lukasz Gottwald - 'Dr Luke.'
Very successful record producer.
Came out of a box...

In places that are not free societies - as far as any of us may say that any one of us really does live in any such a free place anyway nowadays - things are many stages removed from actual social context being reflected as truth inside the story up on the screen. You will not watch a film in China today that says bad things about the CCP, or it's 'Emperor For Life,' Xi.

You will smile, and clap at the appropriate key moments.

...In China. ...Watching a China-made film.

Movies like 'Bond' will attempt to reflect the modern social context inside the movie, as part of an audience-accessible 'reality' - especially when it comes to mechanistic matters, say, of science and technology.

The public expects it.

The most fundamental 'functional' elements of a Bond movie are: 'Bond is kind of good, his employers are completely good, and the villains are bad, purest evil.'

And no one believes that any more.

A percentage of the audience takes in with it, the suspicion that MI5 arranged and carried out the murder of Princess Diana and Dodi Fayed. It doesn't matter why they did that, it's the impression now left in the minds of many people out in the public.

A percentage of the global audience takes in with it, a pre-commitment to Harry and Megan, and a general antipathy towards the UK side of things.

Ken McCallum - current DG of MI5

Notwithstanding that such perceptions might be wildly ludicrous (and I'm not saying they are, necessarily; there will certainly be completely opposed views of course), yet it is simply a fact that the audience is today polarized, very divided, and there are reasons for it:

The UK government is, for instance, grossly improperly detaining Julian Assange - there has never been any legal opinion at any level in the 'British legal mind,' to the effect that Justice delayed is in anyone's interests at all.

A large chunk of a global audience is rooting for the UK government and by association the 'Crown' - to fail and to lose.

I am very personally aware of what the 'issue' is with Julian Assange but even I cannot go that far to think or plan about 'assassinating him' simply because I might or could have government backing to do it (we're talking about a movie fictional context here!). Yet evidence is being tendered to a UK court this week to the effect that such a plan was genuinely 'on the table' with some 'arm' of a secret agency somewhere.

Morality does not come in the liquid dregs of a martini coup!

Just because someone 'orders a martini' is no indication that they are morally okay beneath the hard surface!

Czar Peter the Great Mont Blanc pen.

This martini business, yes, is a leitmotif for the Bond character but so what though?

But now I am going to lay something on you that you might not have thought about before...

Fleming was not a member of the active, operational UK secret services.

He was a reporter for The Sunday Times newspaper (not connected with 'The Times').

And now I'm going to tell you something 'funny' about UK newspapers - for one thing 'The Times' is one of the chief recruiting agencies for MI5.

For reasons not known to anybody, all UK spies are gay. 

And so, even though Fleming never worked for 'The Times,' my friends - his whole thing about the womanizer 'Bond' is a joke Fleming is throwing at the London City establishment in their 'shadowy world' where they are all gay.

Additionally, there is another theme running across any of these matters to do with major national issues, and that is that 'class' at the putative 'top,' is also split along various European family lines and ancient loyalties.

Pic sent in by our 'man in the field.' Fact.

'Henry White ' - the man who started The Sunday Times, was not English; he might have been Irish or Scots and way way back, from some kind of Norse roots. Again, on top of that, the White Family is from the British Indian Army circles and that places them firmly not, in the mob from London City; which is the same crowd that backs the Windsors.

Sir Roger Hollis, now, was he actually a double agent - literally was the man in charge for a good long time, from 1956 to 1965, of MI5. He had been, previously the Deputy Director General under Dick White. And there's your problem right there - White was from the 'White' family (The Sunday Times).

Hollis though, was a man with deeply split loyalties, because he would have been sympathetic to White and his moderately aristocratic ties, because... ...Hollis was a relative of the Russian Royal Family. I'm afraid, and in spite of major propaganda by the UK spooks over decades and decades to pretend that it isn't so - it is so.

Now you see the other problem MI5 and MI6 have, with people like me, is you try and pull the wool over the eyes of those not in the aristocracy and well fine, you might get away with it.

But they will be walking up a very long and steep road to even pretend any of them there today have the 'inner linguistics' which are known only to actual aristocracy...

Hollis was partly of Russian aristocratic descent.

Did that necessarily make him the actual double agent the CIA itself and the assorted 'witch-smellers' of the UK spycatcher group - people such as Jane Sissmore (born in Bengal...) thought that he was?

It doesn't matter.

From our man. Or woman, not saying.

What matters for the sake of finding out what a solid, believable movie 'villain' character would be today - is defining what the public hates viscerally today.

It hates being cheated.

It hates people lording it over them with overwhelming power (EG Emperor Xi of Beijing), who have cheated to get there and then cheat to remain there.

I hope though, you are getting the point that no one can really tell who or what 'the UK' actually represents today. It certainly does not represent an ideal system of human legal justice...

And if they have been trading uninterrupted with China for more than two hundred and fifty years, despite what was going on on the surface, then what even is such a thing as 'a side?' Assange got support from Chinese technology people. But the UK is going out of its way to, well, subtly kill him, really.

The US wants him, but funnily enough they still haven't actually got him. The story was floated that the CIA had plans to kill him...

These matters are way too convoluted to be reduced into some caricature of 'villainy' that can be represented easily in a pop flick.

The World War eras - I and II - gave the public the idea that guns and knives and bombs are the weaponry of choice. The presumed sheer potency of a tiny little pistol in the hands of Mr Bond, James Bond, is a weird kind of psychological support to people who had been bombed in the wars. For generations, they all still felt there was some chance of 'fighting back' - defending oneself - with a little gun in your hands.

Human inside? You wouldn't know.
How would you know??

Even today, the most well-equipped preppers all over the place have semi-auto rifles and Glocks and all that kind of thing. They really do feel, that when the zombies invade - or the ET Aliens that look like insects, or I dunno what else - that some bullets will resolve the situation.

The thing that gives Americans the right to have a gun, legally in their hands, is a piece of paper with some words on it.

It is a little bit of a chicken-and-egg question. Which came first, the gun that backed the piece of paper, or the guy with the words and the ideas?

'Power' does matter - always.

But in the same way that not enough people will ever be around in the general public to comprehend the meaning of the pic above about the pen, fewer still will understand this: 'What are you, O mighty mountain?'

The world has moved on since the times of the recent really big wars - WWI and WWII.

So have a certain tiny small handful of people too.

The 'Bond' of today is so scary, so genuinely powerful, that if you actually told it you the ordinary member of the general public what he/she were like, they would possibly want to turn on them.

The 'villain' is also the 'Bond,' in one sense.

Garrison Restaurant - 
not far from those Ferraris. LOL
Not our pic, though.

It is no longer about 'liberating' the public from oppression - the general public has utterly and fully chosen its fate.  

The public is dying.

Its leaders all believe they are living and surviving but they too, are dying.

And I know you don't believe me.

It's the smile you should take several looks at though... 

Happy Playtime

Soon, here, right here in this very place, there will be some matters arrive - which 'are unusual and likely to be understood by only a small number of people with a specialized knowledge or interest.'

If you go Google-search the word 'esoteric,' you will find: 'intended for or likely to be understood by only a small number of people with a specialized knowledge or interest.'

LOL

I would cast this fellow as 'Q' and I
just gave a lot away right there.

Well I'm not exactly sure why they would be 'of interest to only a small number of people,' because in fact, everyone is looking for these things and cannot find them.

See one problem is of course, that no one really expects to find them!

The forward projections of science are just as filled with silly and often really quite trivial too, fantasies that everyone already knows cannot be fulfilled. For example, personal consciousness being transferred into your computer; some latest AI machine... Or, switching off all of the aging genes entirely and then, even integrating some kind of 'self-fixing' biological process into a living human body - so that, when your flying jet-scooter crashes into the side of a building you 'didn't see coming(!)' all of your physical injuries will self-heal in about twenty minutes.

The jet-bikes will happen, the other stuff will not.

But still, today's scientists are pulled on by the adventure of thinking and talking rubbish and fantasizing about an impossible future.

And then, big-noting themselves to all and sundry about 'how much promise science holds.'

Science is limited by geometry.

This is 'M.'

Actually, the correct wording is 'delimited.' It means having fixed boundaries.

People fantasize about finding certain things, but they don't have genuine hopes of realizing on those things.

Let me give you a banal example, though one which is timely, and one that I have been rolling around in my mind for years now:

The Bond Producers cannot write an authentic contemporary 'Bond villain,' see. Never mind that they have been living off those villains that a long-dead Trans-Atlantic Brit invented out of an era that...

...okay, partly, I come from that era. Let me tell you what would have happened to a woman in high society who told her mother, aunts, female friends - that she had been raped (whether by Bond or someone else).

They would have slapped her face.

That is something you, if you are from today's generations of youngsters (I mean people younger than sixty at least!), would not even begin to have the first idea about why that would have ever even been the case.

Trust me, my friends, there were no dumb women in upper class society. Not as a general rule. Sure there might have been dumb women, but I never met any.

But there are dumb women today. Plenty of them.

Kristen Stewart is not one of them.

That is a proper Hebrides wool tartan
on the right and a 'certain' armorial
family colors on the left.
And none of it, is by accident.
Poor Andrew. LOL

All of you who have been reading here for a very long time, know that I am a Stewart - as in, literally that kind of Stewart. So is she. 

Those of you who have read that book of ours 'How She Should Make Love - The Witches Of Demeter' should have just fallen off your chair then, unless you too are pretty thick, which I know you are not.

When you watch the trailer for the just-released hit flick 'Spencer' you will hear K-Stew deliver the lines 'Here in this house, there is no future; the past and the present are the same thing.'

For those lines alone, she should win the Oscar outright 'by panels of fencing,' as they say.

I am an aristocrat make no mistake, and an authentic one. The Windsors, in our eyes, are middle class people - they are not aristocrats. They never came from aristocracy and they have never been aristocracy.

K-Stew is the very epitome of aristocracy.

LOL - got it yet?

I'm not sure because I haven't Google-searched it (Google is truth, Google is God), but I think last year the twenty-five year embargo period on the Crown Coroner's ruling and the summing up in the trial of Dr Stephen Ward was up - but the UK government slapped on a further twenty six years to keep those things secret from the public.

Now why would that be, d'you think, if they had nothing to hide? There is no 'Communist threat.' There is no 'Soviet Union.'

This is real 'liminality' here
in this pic. Very good photography.
...It's turning to evening now, see.
Time when the monsters come out.

I mean of course I could tell you what the 'Profumo Affair' was really all about. Same as I could divulge secrets about the government of say, Singapore, for example, that would curl your eyelashes.

But I'll not do those things.

Just yet.

Another problem with the latest iteration of the Bond films, is that they know perfectly well the villains are the UK 'secret services' themselves which are all linked up to global banking and finance and the top tier accountancy firms, not so much the lawyer firms which are American-based albeit with 'global head offices' in Switzerland.

Deep down inside people's souls, they have this disquiet that 'if' the UK secret service somewhere, killed Princess Di and Dodi, then they - the audience, the public - cannot whole-heartedly give their support to Bond.

So yeah, I want Orlando, Katheryn Pereira's wife, to be the next Bond, but then again, I really don't want him caught up in all of that saga. I know he's working out heaps to get a 'buff' body and all... He wants the role.

...See how I neatly took y'all away from the esoteric matters that will soon crop up here.

Bond is playtime, nothing more.

Oh yeah he can do it, all right.
Don't you worry 'bout that!

But nothing less though, either!

Maybe just one time more, before we go into the esotericism here, you can all indulge me, just one more time - as I set out for you what a really good 'Bond villain' would be like, in the next exciting article.

And hey, if you have ideas too about that let us know.

And if you hated what I just posted, well, as Brie Larson... Nah nah, you can let me know that as well.

A Weak Grin Over Here

I have to make an admission. Not that I like doing those kinds of things; it is simply not in my standard nature.

What I have been trying to do over recent weeks is not inflame passions and desires for expensive junk.

And believe me, I could!

Imagine you know what a Mandela Effect is...

You might imagine that you are immune to the kind of thing. Forget it. How it happens is very very sneakily, creeping up on the inside of you while you are totally unawares.

But it isn't the only thing I have been avoiding.

I have been also avoiding going even anywhere close to talking about what we are doing here underneath the basic radar. It is far too risky, and dangerous, to open up these particular subject areas.

The whole law of markets and marketplaces is that you do not go around foolhardily pointing out where the 'value' is because all that does is damage your own opportunities. Whilst no one is, or not many are, looking, you get a fairly free go at things.

And there are already a few people in here with a financial interest and so it is just not fair to them blurting out stuff too early and/or unnecessarily.

But where that places me and the couple of other people who contribute behind the scenes, is that we are left, well, really quite lost, in a sense, looking around at what the rest of the world is doing (to maybe showcase that here in the meantime) - and, hey, it is doing not very much!

I mean how many times came you say 'the government is running citizens over with tanks.' They do it all the time. Ain't new.

If you go look at the 'high end marketing literature' circulated to the industries involved there, all you will see are the sorts of phrases like this: 're-inventing the meaning of luxury in the world of climate change...'

Real quality Dry Pink Gin

Well it ain't actually been 're-invented' yet. Were that true, Richemont and LVMH would be making profits which they are not and besides they don't publish real or public figures anyway.

Cary 'Fcuk-You-Naga' totally did 'f-up' the Bond franchise and that will lose a billion dollars right now. So, he never 're-invented' anything there either.

I actually know where the White Rabbit is, I don't need to go chasing down rabbit holes pointed to by losers like Fukunaga.

Who will ever even remember his name ten years from now?

Bet you can't name the stupid Drama Center London plant in the Tim Dalton Bond flick who was the 'Bond Girl' in that?

Not off the top of your head.

'Expensive junk' comes into its own at the right moments - which is not now.

If you are actually for real making money you do not do 'expensive junk.' And the reason for that is expensive junk is always mis-priced. It is not in an actual 'price setting' kind of marketplace in the first place. It exists for rich people and stupid people, or rich and stupid people, to buy.

And the very last thing you want to indulge while you are actively swashbuckling around, is the exercise of being stupid.

Now I can be stupid same as the next man. It's fun. Everyone should try it every now and then. It is highly therapeutic.

This is, the 'White Rabbit,' in Moscow.

Except not now!

...Bet you can still remember Ursula Undressed though, right?

All churches, all religions, and Hollywood movies used to, and politicians think they can do, and advertising companies believe that they manage to, conduct - as you all know - what is called 'enhanced arousal.'

Technically, in the Vedic ideas, they say that Vishnu, when he gives you (well, not you exactly, but some chosen person) 'enlightenment,' he makes you two things.

Those two things that he guarantees you to achieve, are: 1. 'happiness' and 2. 'wisdom.'

Now there are plenty of people in the world who want to deny you, nay, who will deny you if they could possibly do so, happiness.

Wisdom they themselves have not any at all, and better for them that they never saw the day that they were born... ...as the saying goes. For sooner or later they string their own selves up on a tree and throw themselves off a short step.

And that is how it goes.

You see the world is run by depressives. They dress themselves up as any old thing, but never that.

They are not actually 'happy' themselves.

This is where the hopes end. Don't you want to
go, where hopes end?

I'll tell you what 'happy' is. Do you want to know what I think about it?

Well I'll tell you but there are many who will not like this. Just look at that thing in the Gospels where it clearly says 'and then many turned away from him at that point.'

Truth comes in many kinds of disguises but then, it still is actually, the same thing after all.

And what that means is people don't want to hear it.

So I'm going to tell you the truth now, and many will not like this.

'Happy' is when those you are actually genuinely attracted to, like you. I mean, as in they like you as you are. Money is a self-defense mechanism, and one that doesn't work - except most people all think that it can work; it cannot work.

Well I mean there are plenty of people who are not going to like that, especially not hearing it from an arrogant * such as me - but there you are, though, and you can run around in circles as much as you want but there is no amount of money or 'success' as the world wants to define it, that will give you that result absent of the mystical power, as it were, of 'Vishnu.' Yeah maybe you can be 'on the job of finding wisdom' by spending money - so hey, let's have the money; that ain't the issue.

But still that is not ultimate 'happy.' Ultimate happy is when you get to go up to the Elysium space platform with all of your girlfriends too, alongside, and you all remain there for a long long long long... ...and so on.

The Rob Roy.
But in Welsh, the 'Rhi Ben.'
And the leader of damned souls
is called 'Coch Rhi Ben.'

And then, down below, in this pathetic human place, the disasters masquerading as intelligent, sapient beings, all mill around, doing what they always ever did. None of them actually liking any other one of them, but all nodding furiously about how they have... ...sci-ence to back their idiocy up.

You don't have science.

I have science. And why? Because I can so walk on water and you cannot and what's more never will you be able to.

'Who killed Cock Robin' is an ancient Welsh occult myth about a red leader of the damned souls.

But there are still, people right here who will want to argue with me about that.

Well, but to argue, you either need to have the shield and the buckler that can defeat the arrows that can be cast...

These things are not funny jokes at all. They seem funny to the misinformed.

Played this before, here, but still good, and, we are trying to 'steer clear' of the wrong stuff.

No Elites In Our Dystopia

In ancient times, it really was the case that mathematics - well, more particularly geometry - was a cult thing. 

You could not be a member of the Pythagorean school in ancient times, unless you conformed to a whole litany of idiotic rulers and regulations of 'the order.'

Imagine you are a futuristic detective,
looking for clues.
'How to make a million bucks,' for example.

And even then, it took a set - and quite large - number of years before an initiate were introduced to the really core proofs.

A cult is a thing which - and Wikipedia for some reason, is no longer espousing these elements of definition - is a group of people who are devoted to some person, usually, but in addition to some ideas that person holds and promotes to the cult members; but there are different rules for the rank-and-file members as compared to any 'rules' that pertain to the leader, or leadership. 

To be brutally honest, I frankly think Wikipedia has eliminated that aspect about 'different rules' because it would simply make all politics and governments nothing but cults now - which of course, they are.

It is neither a stretch of the imagination to be able to see, nor is it an accident, that Kamala Harris dresses like 'Secretary Delacourt' out of the movie 'Elysium.'

Both in the case of the Pythagorean cult, as well as in the cult of modern politics, it is not that deep inside of either thing, there is not some tremendously important significant item, usually a structured idea of some kind.

The geometry of Pythagoras can do a lot of things, and the exercise of state power by criminal elites who sit atop and are in control is also able to do a lot of things - but still they are both cults.

Looking for clues, or coffee,
and it's raining.

There is nothing being said here in these pages that is in the nature of a cult. They can get you up in a piece of hardware, right out into the Oort Cloud Belt, if need be - that is, physically get you up there. If you are even slightly overweight it may actually feel better for you unless your peristaltic muscle system is not working as it should be doing, normally.

No doubt William Shatner will be under very careful medical supervision all the way from now until the date when it is scheduled to blast him off into space on the Blue Origin platform.

And, his body will be under constant monitoring during the rocket's launch and all the way as he goes into orbit and then returns back down to Earth.

The human body is meant to be optimally functional here on the planet, not in rockets at high G-force or in space at virtually zero gravity.

Just what the US Air Force imagined it was doing not disclosing from very early on, the incidents with UFO's (they were uniformly being called just 'UFO's' back then) in 1967 in Montana and a couple of other locations where there were nuclear missiles - I do not know (well, I do but they are silly reasons to do with the Cold War and not much else at all).

And although the media tends to suggest that it was a nuclear missile site engineer, technician and military commander-operator - Robert Salas - who went public about the incidents, in fact it was an internal military and government decision to cautiously 'reveal' the matter, subsequent to which Salas then confirmed that it had indeed happened.

What I'm saying here is that you can take it as read that UFO's are physical, material objects in which there are real living beings - and that might or could, include you.

There is no reason why it could not include you; at least not technically, nor for any other reason (would you be absolutely prevented).

There are some subtle - and they are very subtle - questions about safety but that's about it.

Okay let's take it the next logical step here...

Gives you ultra-health; makes you
young again.

You see, if and actually it is no longer an 'if' at all but a straight out fact of life - 'if' there are UAV's piloted by living beings, who are in touch with a handful of human or human-hybrid people here, then for a very long time now, those people have been going up in those craft and 'doing things.'

But what I'm saying now is - that could be you. There is no reason why not.

This is not a cult thing.

I mean hey, sure there will be those turning stuff into cult things but those are not the 'real thing/s.'

There are safety issues and there are dangers, but then, there are those things with driving a car down the road.

Twenty years from now we will have quite a lot of air-bikes flying around cities.

Fifty years from now there will be people living on platforms in space orbiting the planet. No question at all.

Seventy-five years from now they will be able to 'transit' your sense of yourself (your 'consciousness') into a machine brain. 

Now what that means is you are never going to die. According to that schema.

That is the trajectory of things right now.

They think they know, but they don't know.

I have never - here - said to anyone, well I simply won't open up the discussion with you because you are locked out of anything for some gratuitous reason. What I have said is that there are dangers both to the person individually and to those others around him/her if they get too deeply into this area.

Money and advanced technology meet 'head-to-head' though in a way, because it becomes clear no sooner than you have introduced anything spectacularly new, that there is much politics involved.

Technology that can fly around and quite clearly in a coordinated way disable nuclear missile launches, can just as easily extract gold from leaves or from seawater or from the ground. Where's the problem? There is no problem.

Arabic legends of Suleiman the Magnificent present him being brought liberal piles of gold and gems by the Djinn.

But he was explicitly denoted as 'Solomon the Wise' and not just 'the Magnificent' or 'the Great.'

We have a massive problem here on this planet and it is a problem which will not be solved by politicians at all -, nor by judges, nor doctors, scientists or anyone else.

The problem is like this - give you just one single 'magic'ed up' ounce of gold the one time and your brain will automatically shift gears to thinking 'how much, how many, how many people, how much personal power...'

Hunter in the snow...

It will never not even the one single solitary time, stop to think, 'hey but who?' 'Who is this that has been doing this all along, and for how long, and what are they like themselves and how do they think and what is it they think is the responsible, right thing to do?'

Ah but, my friends, in any case, you would not be 'the only animal in the woods' here.

Do you get that?

Do you get, that at some time, before anyone gave you a 'heads up' on this like this - there already has been history?

You think you 'might' throw your lot in with the 'future according to the present trajectory.'

And you may think that this trajectory is natural. It is simply something in accordance with the development, the evolution, of Mankind.

Pythagoras was not really running a cult. 

He knew something you don't even know that clearly today, right now today, 2021.

And has to do with the 'bit of machinery' shown in the movie 'Elysium.' The ones up next to the paragraphs above. You think these motifs are there in movies like this because - accident, right?

There is no one here on this planet that has this kind of technology. And they will never have it.

Not unless they steal it. And that isn't going to happen.

The soldier of counterpane.

Because THAT is the reason not everyone gets to go up in the UAV's.

Some of you people are really stupid. Hey, so am I, I'm not slinging off at 'you,' particularly.

Professor John Mack, were he alive here today right now, would be ninety-five.

And that makes some of the people I have posted very very recent pics of, um, seventy.

Got the picture yet?

Yeah go on. Keep on thinking 'no way...'

There's 'us' and there is 'them,' see.

And you have to be very very certain which side you want to be on now.

It Always Sounds Stupid

Till it isn't stupid...

I realize though, that this place is intended for only those with enough fire-power in their intellects to be able to handle the necessary sarcasm which hides a number of things.

If you have the requisite fire-power in your intellect, you will place your treasure where nothing can get at it. Where your treasure is, there shall your heart also be.

This is not 'liminal space.'
Hehehehehe.

And, as for him who built his house on the shifting sands, the rain descended, and the floods came, and the winds blew, and beat upon that house, and it fell, and great was the fall of it.

Ominous words, my friends.

You know when David Icke says that Wernher von Braun's secretary said that von Brown said the shadow governments would manufacture a fake ET Alien invasion (as you can see, this is an authentic chain of narration) - just how does anyone imagine that 'invasion' would be so convincing that the public would all accept that the thing was a serious threat at all?

Well okay, at the moment, they are not having to mount this faked 'invasion,' because of the comparative results they are procuring via the pandemic - which you will grant, is real enough and many many people are dying. Just what exactly they are dying of is another question, but they are dying all the same.

But I guarantee you, there will never be a 'faked ET Alien invasion' without some serious and deadly activities by 'ET Aliens.'

Never really thunked of that, didya??

What? Did you imagine - 'Oh look Martha, little white flying lollies.' And that would be it?

And then everyone would simply just grant massive global martial law powers to some unique un-elected central authority in Brussels?

Why even now, people are installing apps on their smart phones with which to make contact with ET Aliens.

This is also not 'liminal space' although
they like to say that it is.

Tell you how long after we put out the narrative about some HK China spy people releasing the virus, before it 'actually happened' - or at least, the MSM picked it up and the globalists ran with what was already afoot.

Frank Plummer had just run away to Kenya where he was Gareth Williams'd a few months later in February 2020.

So it was a year and a half from when we first put the thing out.

The virus was already out there, but then, here's the thing, see. Everyone believes there is just one 'virus.' There is not, there are two completely different viruses.

Anyway, don't worry about that. It's not important.

What's important is that you factor in the high risks that Turkey will provocate and create a literal war between several proxies - and Saudi Arabia. And this is something going on in the background to what the globalists are seeking to do all by themselves on the incorrect assumption they are making that there are only two players on the field: themselves, and you.

There is not; there is - themselves (Shaytan #2), and Erdo-Khan (Shaytan #1).

Xi - is in with the 'Shaytan #2.' But him and them think they are 'Shaytan excluding all other shayateen.'

How you really drink cognac, is
you rest it sideways into a tea cup of
hot water, and twirl the glass around,
and then drop a spoonful of
also warmed honey into it.

See, 'you' - you are not a big thing in their equations. You, they already have you beat.

You are just 'cows' and/or 'sheep.'

And yes, the JOOOZ have been clinging onto these new chapters of the Quran that they found among the Dead Sea Scrolls which prove that Muhammad was a real prophet...

You didn't know?

Oh yes. You know the chapters called 'the Chapter of the Cow,' and 'the Chapter of the Camel,' and 'the Chapter of the Sword?'

Well there are these others they found proving Muhammad was a real prophet: they are called 'the Chapter of the Nano-Bots,' and 'the Chapter of the Chemical Laser Beam Cannon.'

I mean, miracle of miracles! How could anyone from the Dark Ages, have known of such things?! The only reason these chapters were not included in the past, was because people previously didn't know what the words meant, they did not know how to translate them - because they didn't have the words and concepts to make sense of what was written down there.

Yeah yeah oh yeah - 'Aleph Lam Mem;' stands for 'Alkool' (chemical), 'Lazrrrh' (laser), 'Meme' (which is the ancient high-class Arabic way for saying 'Beam'). But you have to be an authentic Arabic scholar to know this.

What - do you disbelieve??

This is real liminal space!

People believe mostly garbage, see. And when it comes to actual clearly verifiable reality - or even just plain testable hypotheses, they absolutely never go down that road to see what they know they will be uncomfortable with finding down the end there.

There are real ET Aliens, and they can sure as eggs kill you. As easily and as quickly as look at you.

And there are totally faked things too that miscreant actors do with a hidden hand, so to speak, but their motive is easy to read. They want power over you and they want rules for you which don't apply to them because they have 'special rules' for themselves.

This is the test you should apply to whatever you hear about 'some kinds of wild things happening:' if a very prominent political leader or cult personality gets killed by an 'ET Alien' well then, that did happen. But if only a low-life like you died, then it ain't true.

And shaytans do not sacrifice other shaytans. So they will not kill one of their own to make things appear oh so real. They will kill you.

And that will prove that it's fake.

And if you think this stuff is not going to happen well then, it is bound to sound extremely silly of course...

...Until it stops sounding silly at all. By which time it will be too late for thou.