Hard To 'Preach' Good Times!

Well it is!

How easy is it for you, right now, to believe that times are good?

Where do you have the time or the 'brain space,' right now, to focus on and pay attention to all those important things which will bring you ever greater and great happiness?

The apparent obtaining situation across the whole entire globe, is not good. People are beset by many problems.

The iron ring where 'Buraq'
was tied...

Nevertheless, right here we shall go - very briefly - to the false and the foolish ideas that people hold, and the silly things they do, which gain them nothing at all in the end, before we look at what we ourselves must do.

In the Dome of the Rock in Jerusalem, there is a spot on a stone wall, in which is located an iron ring, onto which the flying Buraq was tied, after it had taken Muhammad salla allahu alayhi wa ali wa sallam... ...to the Masjid al-Aqsa (Dome of the Rock). And from whence he further conveyed prophet Muhammad salla allahu alayhi wasallam... ...to all seven of the seven heavens.

Unhappily, Muhammad salla allahu alayhi wa ali wasallam... ...Huuuuuuugh (deep breath in) was not provided with an iPhone with which he could have taken some snapshots and uploaded onto Snapchat so that in our times, astrophysicist Avi Loeb could have examined these as primary evidence to adjudge for us - since none of us are intelligent enough to tell fact from fantasy.

However, an indication of exactly how stunning and fantastic the power of Almighty Allah (subhana wa ta'ala) and his magnificent creatures, is, can be understood from the fact that Allah (Azzawajal) possessed transporter beams long before Gene Roddenberry had them on Star Trek...

...since the iron ring on the stone wall is down four flights of stairs into a cave that has been turned into a small rectangular room, a long way down under the Dome (of the Rock).

The passages that lead to this room are rather narrow and certainly no horse is able to go through them, even if it was able to float down several flights of stairs.

Transporter room. See? How there is a
'control desk' which controls the beam -
'technology of cause and effect.' LOL
It's absurd of course, in terms of actual meaningful
explanation. 
But it's a fictional movie.

In an adjoining walled off space, there is another 'flat stone' or 'rock,' on which the angel Israfil shall one day blow his trumpet signalling the end of the world..

Nevertheless, you will never find anyone dispute that any of these beliefs are impossible or that that may not be 'facts.'

I know the large shops at Christmas vend 'reindeer food' for Santa's reindeer but I think this is still meant to be placed outside and not indoors near the hearth of the chimney (usually a 'deco' fake chimney these days) where Santa comes down by some magical means, again - perhaps using his transporter beam too.

Still, interestingly 'Buraq' possesses a name (which is - 'Buraq') that is very suspiciously close to 'Blitzen' of the Santa reindeer nine. Both words mean 'lightning.'

It cuts all ways though - you can also have a really 'materialistic' and 'hard-nosed' individual, such as Herod, and he said a few words to the people gathered around at a certain occasion, and those people shouted 'this is a god speaking' about him and his delivery - but not five seconds later, he fell down dead from gangrene poisoning or something.

The power of ordinary human beings can be very far-reaching, very damaging, very hurtful - and this power can cause much suffering: millions can die. But then again all such 'gurus' fail at last.

And that is because they do not have the power that you want to have...

It is not true to say that humans have no power; they have power.

Someone's going to come down there,
and blow a trumpet, and - EOW!

It's only a certain kind of power. It's the active human power to do anything by connecting a cause to the effect - and it can be actively enabled so long as the person doing it is alive. If someone was delusional, but succeeded in making others also believe in their delusion, certainly, the effects of their delusional behavior can happen again and again, but still only through the actions of the next crop of 'living' agents of that delusional 'cause-and-effect' template that the instigator promoted.

So nonetheless we have seen that just because someone dies - which event particularly contradicts their own assertions - this does not mean that people stop believing whatever nonsense the person was saying.

The Caliph Umar said he was not going to die and the 'angel Jibreel' was going to heal him - but he died.

Herod claimed to be a kind of a literal 'god' and in the very instant he proclaimed that, he dropped dead.

The problem does not stem from the fact that someone is a damned liar and a self-serving criminal - the problem arises out of the standard time profile of events when it comes to most things 'human.' We feel the bad longer and more keenly, and we tend to forget the good moments altogether, after awhile.

And in addition, people cannot be entirely blamed though, without applying mitigating factors because they are just being self-protective or do 'bad things' in superficially 'absolute terms' by religious standards - but those things were arguably necessary to defend against the much more powerful who are practicing very great evil.

The situation of 'the human race' is that the human individual is inside a massively large frame in which there are many forces of compulsion - and these forces are external to the person.They happen to him, they do not necessarily simply come out from him.

Over thousands of years, people have arrived at the idea, that there is a natural 'human social' ethos, a moral ideology, which says that we should or we must, as humans, do things that lessen the negative impacts on those around us while we live, and benefit those who come after us after we have died!

And this is the thing that prevents us from 'going too far' in our own lives, in order to get our way and to get whatever we want if we have the superior power compared to our fellow men.

This is sort of, 'secular humanism.'

The whole thing depends on human beings needing a cause to justify an effect.

And all of this applies to things -, not to people...

That 'effect' which is 'a good person,' an inwardly decent person with no doubtful aspects, a person who is mature and subtly nuanced in what is even their inner 'character' of 'goodness' - depends on no material cause at all. Yes politicians in particular, make justifications whose object is to convince others they are 'decent' and 'good.' But this is typical post factum fallacious argumentation.

EG: 'I did a bad thing, but really it was a good thing, because...'

Forget the justifications after the fact - tell me what makes you always tend to do good, as a pre-existing stance that is to do with you as a person.

See, I do not want to open a thirty year old bottle of Napoleon - since as de Balzac said, we should not open a Napoleon brandy under around thirty years of age - and drink it with Kamala Harris or Jeff Bezos, or any of these kinds of 'famous' people.

The 'cause' that really connects to the effect of me opening some Napoleon brandy with someone is actually about the effect itself anyway and not a non-intrinsic material cause.

The truly great gurus, the 'siddhis' - they can make things appear without resorting to the cause.

They are the effect.

I would open a Napoleon,
in here...

But this is a complex argument to do with the complete permanency of that which is 'good.'

And most people are so delusional, so deeply steeped in the lunacy of 'human society' that they will spend all of their energy disputing what was just said here.

Humans are both the cause of, as well as the effect of, everything they experience as members of their own social groups.

By nature, people are unwilling to accept that things can change. They see the material things in the hands of some moron, and desire that thing, or those material things, but they think 'there is only one way to get those things' - yet what they will want, no sooner than getting the 'thing' is to have some people that they like around them.

And they spend so much time and energy going around matters that way, that the morons and pretty distasteful crew always keep control of a lot of those material things - because their ethical standards laugh at the moral standards of the rest, but those aspiring people cannot and will not become evil like them in order to get those things.

...If people went around the other way, seeking the people that they can like first, what happens is that the unlikable people become alone.

But the most important lesson that people learn doing things this way, is that they learn to stop always needing a cause to justify an effect, and instead learn being the effect itself.

Yes I understand things 'might' make us happy. But not for long. We want 'happy,' and we want things. We want both, we want all.

'All' is beyond 'human power.' All is a 'god power' thing. But 'god' is not a guy stuck in the past... God is not an artifact. Not an 'iron ring.' But what is He exactly? Does He even exist? Well, He is certainly not an iron ring, that's for sure. The Christians say, He is there in the midst of you... ...when you are among those you will open that Napoleon for.

So is that true? And if it is, can we just have that BMW now as well?

; )

Why 'Evidence' Is Problematic

If you look at the Israeli physicist Avi Loeb, it isn't difficult to see him as completely sincere, completely honest, open-minded certainly - and apparently realistic.

Recently in an interview he said, something like: 'what we need is high pixilation, dense pixilation photographs, images - you know, where we can see, maybe, rivets, signs of technology...

San Francisco 1%-er's. You won't be allowed in
there - where they are having fun while some
thousands are homeless in the streets.
Not even Laura Ingraham would be allowed
in there now! 

'And like someone walking along a beach and finding old plastic bottles, we will be able to say for certain that we have the remnants of someone else's technology. And we have the technology in private hands now, to be able to search and to find it, if it is there to be found; and we happen to know it is there. The problem in the past, about governments releasing such information, had to do with the secrecy of the sensors that were being used. But we have that technology ourselves privately now, even better technology too.'

I mean you have to admire firstly the man's sincerity, and to the casual observer, his proposition is very rational and realistic.

Except it isn't.

And I will tell you why. ...He also said that 'witness accounts' or 'eye-witness accounts' do not constitute sufficiently testable evidence - but in saying that, he forgot who the actual subjects were, he was assuming were even able to distinguish facts from lies. And he leapt to an entirely problematic (in fact, it is an outright and demonstrably false) presumption, that all people have no hidden, malicious agendas, and are willing to expose 'truth' without politics.

When you look at, for instance, positive proponents of the 'ET Alien hypotheses' that are all over the place (and never really 'left town' since forever anyway!) - anyone can see that the 'narratives' and explanations are simply riddled with some bad thinking, some 'illogical thinking' (fallacious thinking), and occasionally there might be a tiny handful of people whose voices are actually mostly all virtually drowned out completely by the idiots.

So then, someone turns up with a really stunning 'piece' (it might even be lots of evidence! Would not make any difference at all) of 'evidence.'

What happens?

Actually does have an 'age statement' - blended
obviously, and is supposed to be of course.
I haven't had this one... ...yet.

You think, and I'm sure that there was at least one person here whose first inclination would be to say 1., no one ever will (come up with any actual hard evidence), and 2., the evidence doesn't stack up.

You see the problem is this:

Avi Loeb might be honest and direct and open and sincere, with no major 'ulterior motivation,' but what makes you suppose that his example reflects what everyone else is like?

There are many people for whom it would be completely against their interests if it ever should become the case that the general public found out about super advanced ET Aliens - both that such things are real, and more significantly, what such beings are all about.

And what makes anyone think that you cannot completely undermine good evidence, by being outright malicious for your own reasons, and rushing onto the scene, and spouting utter crap, making out that you are 'being honest/scientific/'skeptical' when you are actually, not - and literally using the exact same poor standards, or even non-existent standards, of 'logic' and rational thinking, literally interposing faulty logic, fallacious thinking across things to deliberately muddy the water, so to speak? In other words, to do what is nowadays called 'astro-turfing?' In other words, this is the symmetry argument for irrationality, and/or fallacious thinking.

Within a short time, the 'hard evidence' would become the same type of thing that science itself has become over the last fifty years - that is, political; aka 'Karl Popper' science. You literally cannot go to any top-research grant funded University anywhere in the world and not 'learn' Karl Popper-cult 'science.' It is just plain not science at all - it is Karl Popper-flavored 'academia' (and even that is a completely fraudulent misnomer) 'science.'

Snobs insist on
'Glencairns' these days.
But I like these too, and they are 
a completely
different experience to
the whole 'Glencairn' thing.

'Political' is just about who won the 'tussle,' not who was correct in the absolute.

'Remnants of technology' - like discarded coke bottles in the South African movie 'The Gods Must Be Crazy' presumes they (the Aliens) leave rubbish lying around... ...and in any case, it is not active functioning technology, as such. 'Advanced Alien technology' is something, that if 'possessed,' as in - has been granted to anyone - will simply be used by them without them really telling anyone else.

But here is the other problem simply no one will face honestly at all. Let's say that 'prophet Muhammad' really did encounter a 'being who came down from a light in the sky, and whose skin was strange, and different, glowing bronze or golden' and who gave 'Muhammad' something that allowed Muhammad to completely take over virtually the whole civilized world of the day.

No sooner had that actually happened, though, than that Muhammad started beheading people he didn't like, and in one case, caused an old woman to be torn asunder between two goaded horses.

So. Let's say that 'Muhammad' did receive 'unusual' knowledge and especially, power. But then, like all human beings who have power - it went straight to his head.

In his case, he claimed that he was only slaughtering people 'to save their souls (maybe) and the souls of those around them who they were influencing.' Well is that a good enough 'justification' for getting your way when you can? By killing people? ...Must have been a pretty sub-standard 'Alien' (if that's even what it was; but let's just say so for the point) that Muhammad encountered, in my view.

'Umar' (who was either the actual identity now called 'Muhammad' or else his nearest 'Caliph' - aka successor) - died of gangrene from being stabbed in the side, after three days although he had told his followers 'the angel Gabriel' was going to cure him, and that in any case, he would 'rise from the dead' (if he died) after three days. However he just died is what happened.

What makes it the case that any one of us, who, receiving some specialized knowledge and technology, from super advanced ET Aliens, would not ourselves succumb to what always gets the better of human nature?

Really though. What's the absolutely decisive answer to that?

Do you have one?

Well what is it?

Give me the hard evidence, that you really are a trust-able, trustworthy individual...

All of you 'skeptics' and atheists out there - you better hope like hell all of this 'ET Alien talk' is just rubbish.

...Which it ain't.

But it isn't quite 'game over' yet anyway though, and I'll tell you why.

'I like to do you slowly,' that's what Paul Keating said; not me. I never said it.

'Slowly' by the way, is how you sip whisky. It should take you about an hour to 'do' what is in that tumbler in the pic above. Yes, a whole hour.

And the evidence, of if the stuff is any good, depends on the people that you are drinking with.

How To Make Millions

So let's talk Teodorin Obiang Nguema - good friend at one time of Barack Hussein Alhamdulillah Obama and 'Michael' as well.

Oh, I forgot to mention one 'Jeffrey Epstein.'

Jeffrey traveled quite a bit to Equatorial Guinea, where Teodorin's daddy is the boss-man.

Well, he's actually the under-boss, because Chevron owns the place. It is the, around about, 43rd richest country in the world. Its people own nothing and are supremely happy living on about two dollars a day. Although not quite two dollars, according to the formal published 'world research.'

Teodorin spent a bunch of cash at Gucci,
apparently, for his woman. I think he has
just one of them. Wow, you'd have to wonder
if CIA is turning her file over to um, 'Vera...'
Except Vera's 'on long leave' right now.
So at least you are safe Teo, for the moment.
That is unless, Christina Mikkelsen isn't already
'on the team...' She's suspiciously been in 'all
the wrong places...' LOL 

But we'll round it up, okay.

France and Macron and before him that Hungarian guy who was 'front man' there and who took all the oil assets of Libya when they invaded it just after the 'Gulf War,' got a bit mad with Teodorin - no connection at all with the fact that France's oil companies were frozen out of the Equatorial Guinea smorgasbord.

And speaking of smorgasbord, Teodorin's wife is a hot Danish woman who is or was, and maybe even still is, a beauty queen and model and everything like that.

You cannot deny Teodorin's taste and style - according to the trial submissions, he amassed some 300 bottles of vintage Chateau Petrus.

Which I believe he still has, although the French court walked away with a fine ruling against him and a brace of super-cars which poor Teodorin foolishly garaged in Switzerland.

And a 'suspended jail term.'

Teodorin will eventually be the absolute ruler of Equatorial Guinea and whatever thing the French supposed they were achieving going hard against him that time, well, good luck to them on that!

Now if you stuck that 'directed energy weapon' into Teodorin's hands. Well, I mean, can you just imagine it!

How come 'old school' had so much style?

Tut tut. Such a thing would never do.

Which is why those sorts of things are in responsible people's hands.

And that means, by implication, those things are not, either, in the hands of people like Chevron! LOL

Erik Prince? Well, good question...

Well just whose hands are they in though? Space Force just declassified some stuff probably with the view to try and impress, well, you know, those with the actual weaponry.

Doesn't impress me much though, I have to say.

Jesus! Just had five hundred numbers added to the 'off balance sheet' Blog 're-posting.' You didn't know we did that, did you?

Look at this, Teodorin!
Look at this, man!

Oh yeah. We're up, high up in the stratospheric numbers right now. Implied. Let's just call them 'implied numbers' for now. And those people don't even know there is a Blog - this is a private Blog here, see. We 'mess things around a bit' so they can't trace or track. Not properly. And also, not enough 'full conversions' yet, however.

So, no celebrations yet, boys and girls.

And nah, we do not have any 'secret stashes' of Lamborghini Venenos' in Schweiz land.

We do not!

Honest. Eagle Scout promise. (Actually, I was never an eagle scout. Just a cub scout...).

Fish In A Barrel

Reuters is reporting that the reason Kamala Harris's retinue was delayed from leaving for Vietnam was an 'incident of Havana Syndrome.'

Havana Syndrome, as you know, is some form of 'directed energy' acoustic weapon.

Weapons are dangerous of course, and must not be used. Especially, they are not to be owned by private citizens. You know, like, in case they have more ones and better ones than anyone in government, and can * the government anywhere, anytime.

Bad, see.

Looks like 'the Titanic' to me,
that stupid bit on the top. ...When you look
closely.

Bad stuff. Very bad stuff.

Given that Singapore is probably the premier 'surveillance state' on the planet, it is a little surprising that the person or people deploying such wicked devices, such weapons - were not interdicted in the very act, nor have they been apprehended as of the minute.

The Kremlin immediately rushed to press declaring - 'wasn't them!'

The American Embassy in Havana in 2016 was 'afflicted' by chirping crickets or something, though so much so (loud chirping cricket noises) that embassy staff were 'falling to the ground' and have experienced in some cases what appears to be permanent health damage, and possibly even 'organic' types of mental health damage. So naturally then, at that time, the Russians were blamed, since they have been buddies with the Cubees since Bay of Pigs and Krushchev and all of that. And everyone assumes they have 'the technology' for this sort of thing.

Now, this is another one of these situations in which, resorting to a blind belief that Wikipedia 'knows it all' (I mean, yes, it is certainly a know-it-all, but that doesn't mean that what it 'knows' is even vaguely correct, often) is a big mistake.

You know, funny thing about these
'beautiful' pics - when you can see
into all the tiny cracks, and see all of
the people there, and all of their 'issues,'
you're not interested in the place anymore;
it becomes literally worthless in your mind.
This is the problem with 'over-arching power.'
Anyway, I personally never find the 'little people' worthless.
But I absolutely do find that most of the 'big
people' are. Lucky I have no power.

Yet, I can assure you that the CIA is, actually relying on Vanity Fair and Wikipedia as the best information nodes, tying in various Karl Popper-style scientists there, to give them the best insights into what is going on so that they can report back to Kamala the 'sit rep.' 

Hey, if you think I'm joking, the mere fact that we are all still here, over here, in the office punching keys, and haven't been arrested - just shows you how far off the page of facts these morons all are right now.

Though really, if you think about it, and are practical and rational about it, it is just a case of mass hysteria.

...Oh, and weather balloons. Definitely those. Because if there is even just a small pin-prick sized hole in a very large weather balloon, the escaping pressurized air makes a high-pitched noise that hysterical people can easily conclude (in typical 'conspiracy thinking' mentality) is a 'sophisticated directed energy weapon.'

Clearly, the officials, and the 'security details' - all those tough, black-suited thugs in full-face masks - are nothing but a bunch of delusional complainers, given to exaggeration, hysteria, and hallucinating. They're prolly on medically-prescribed drugs too anyway - amphetamines to make them 'hyped' and 'tough.'

Shaun Evans. He should be the next Bond.
He won't be, but so what? He should be.
And that's all that counts.

Singapore also has a track-record of, er, 'Mexicans' being seconded into the local rapid response and also armed security forces for all kinds of very proper reasons. So, 'Mexicans' could easily be mistaken for Cubans...

Interestingly, there have been no reports that Kamala got hit with any 'directed energy beam.'

Although of course, when you do strategic analysis, you can easily see all of the cannonball effects when you take out a 'top leader.'

So what has to happen first, is that the CIA, and Vanity Fair, and especially the New Yorker, to say nothing of Cuomo at CNN - they have to all firm up on who is to blame, and what the technology being used actually is...

...And all of that before anyone with genuine brain-power is likely to take out a 'top leader.'

Which they will do, however, at the right moment.

You know funny thing about 'better bows and arrows.' They always get used.

And then the world changes to accommodate the new paradigm. Which is really just the old paradigm being played out onto new people, as they say.

Wasn't me though. Right?

Well it wasn't!

I'm not even in Singapore. None of our people are. As you know.

So what happens next?

We release the night. Is what happens next. 

Don't worry about a thing. Nobody can touch us. It's all already over. And the pain, is going to hurt. And this time, no one is going to make it back from the pain and hurt. There is not gonna be no '...And Cain lived in the land East of Nod, until the days of his life ended.'

Go on - 'laugh clown.' Laugh. Isn't that so, Kamala? It's funny now isn't it? See how funny it is?

   

Watch, Remain Unperturbed

Shortly, right here in these pages, there will be sudden influxes of much larger numbers of people stopping by.

And you will see ridiculously absurd articles, but that could have the effect of making you rush off to raid your own piggy bank.

Well don't do it, right.

What is happening, yes, is bound to alarm some, disturb others, and make some throw themselves into a frenzy.

But just relax, no one is going to miss out. And you are not going to miss out either. On anything which could even vaguely be made public.

Some things are highly dangerous though, aren't they?

It isn't until one is actually confronted with some reality that previously one had considered dubious in the extreme...

I know what's in the thing and it is, absolutely mind-blowing.

For me I find it ever so slightly amusing that literally no one, anywhere across the whole internet makes any kind of statement declaring that they are able to 'produce actual physical meetings with ET Aliens, virtually at will, or at least upon reasonable request.'

Given that everyone (else) you know is simply an 'expert,' right...

LOL

I am making that statement here though.

Hmn, water. Nice. No bubbles...
Wa? Where's my bubbles Charlie?

You're not going to miss out on anything but let me tell you something very brutal - these 'beings' are extremely dangerous.

This is not some silly escapade that the US government woke up one morning and decided it was going to pull you, the tax-paying citizen, along for a tax-dollar funded ride over.

This is not something the whole entire panoply of the FBI can take on 'with their drum machine guns in hand and say - ' come out with your hands up, you are completely surrounded.'

I am sure a lot of you are still saying to yourselves: 'he's crazy or he's joking (badly),' or both.

Nah but I'm not joking, see.

I could be crazy but then so what?

Anyway, all I'm really saying is be prepared to read a few head twisting things in these pages quite soon; I don't exactly know how 'quite soon' but rather soon, I would guess.

And soon, too, there will be this year's NYC 'Met Arts Museum' gala. It is going to take place in a couple of weeks from now.

Eva Longoria will be there and her costume - or dress, or fashion, whatever you want to call it - will be the leading one in this year's theme of 'America and New Identity.'

How do I know she will be there? And how do I know all the rest of it?

Because I know that's how I know.

Collaboration between Rolls Royce and an
Argentine fragrance company -
smells like the inside of a Roller.
Except it would not be that one the
local 'Incogniti' cricket team captain drove
around in - because that was oh, dear me,
cricket balls and creams and sweat and...

The 'VIP guest list' is not published anywhere of course. Way too risky what with one thing or the other.

Me, if I were invited - which I can never see myself as being, thank goodness - I would go wearing a ghutra or shemagh and a thawb.

But then, I prolly would have it hand cut by Davide Taub... ...of Savile Row.

Hey, by the way - all of you should be able to quickly identify where the 'cutting' of a hand-made suit or sports jacket happened.

You should be easily able to pick out Shanghai (laser pattern cutting) typical Shanghainese styles, virtually always, which will include that old school black black Japanese modern royal court style as well as the over broad French styles - from that modern far too tight London stupidity... and of course, there is always the tension between the Neapolitan styles and the Milanese and Florentine modes.

This one here is quite obviously my eternally favorite French style.

There is this place in Europe, right, where if you went certain times of the year, you would think there was some huge engineer's convention on or something - but it's a just a bunch of guys all pretending! LOLOLOL.

The place is Milan of course.

Can't half tell it's French. Jeez.

I know some German marketing people who actually convinced their bosses to actually, literally, have a 'stand' out there at those 'special times' just in case there were some real engineers show up. True! I swear!

Today our Russian friends had Cherries Jubilee that I made for them. They all got a bit worried when I set the 'fire-fall' of nutmeg off under their noses.

The fun never ends around here.

...And stop thinking about spending money, goddammit.

I know what you're thinking. Does he have two million readers somewhere, or only five (million of them)?

Well? Do I?

Do I?

Waddya suppose? Are ya feelin' lucky? Huh? 

Huh?

Take a shot at it.

After the fire burns out...

...I like this piece of music coming up next. It's like the Cherries Jubilee - doesn't ever seem like anything too special once you get around the 'setting things on fire again' part; but then, one day, or more likely one evening, you'll be walking down the road on your way to the Paris-origin mistress that your wife insisted that you had (and I do mean that she insisted for you to have and keep...), and all of a sudden this thought pops into your head: 'I think I need some - some, Cherries Jubilee right now. But Valyeryeee takes so long to get dressed up to go out... ...Maybe I just, I just stop by the King's Street little place and see if any of the private chefs are there for any reason... Just to see, you know, if, they might, might want to, set something on fire and that.'

WTF? Valyeryee is there with you-know-who. Damn. WTH?! They are, having damn Cherries Jubilee! And no one told me!

Talk about cherry chapstick. I DK. D'you think Katy will be turning up at the Met this year?

Huh? Huh? Do yer? 

She is Mrs Legolas the Elf these days. I like Orlando a lot. He has really risen in my estimation, given that he was yes, very great in the small roles he had, but they never gave him the outright best 'full length feature' parts, did they. Silly people. He taught them, though. He he. Good for him. In the gym heaps these days. 'Buff,' is that what they say?

So we at least have Hiddleston and Legolas. ...And Mrs Legolas. And there's one or two other women who can cut it on screen.

You sprinkle different spices in there
and it burns different colors...

God if they only had some material to work with. And Hitchcock. Not Vadim, he'd mess with the ladies' heads. Although you have to say, that would still be a thing to watch, in its own right.

This track, below: 'Dasvidaniya.' That's Sanskrit, in case you though it was Russky.

Well, hey! We are all 'nuovo-Bohemian' as in literally French post the head-chopping and all of that, people around here, you know. I was watching that recent tv series about Christine Keeler and John Profumo, and every time 'Stephen Ward' - who was my father's um, nephew? No, my dad's aunt's nephew! Whew. ...Well every time he turns up on the screen I go, 'yeah, well, awright, I suppose.' It is us, the bad side, anyway. Man I could tell you things about that story that will never appear in any movies, or in any newspapers, ever. I'll give you a clue though. Mrs John Prufomo... She never features very much in the 'back story.' What a laugh. From Country Antrim, she was. Where King James went and hid out that time. 

Well?

Do you feel lucky yet? Eh? Who wants to have a shot? Bring the whole *'n Navy with you, right. I mean the UK Navy not the good guys. And not the Russian Navy, either, with all of their gravy. Or is that my gravy - in that advert... I forget. And it doesn't matter.