'My Hand Beats Yours'

Except it's not a game. And - no, we won't be closing the comments section just yet.

But let's just look at the current war in Israel.

There are idiots all over the whole planet - and we are talking really well-credentialed idiots, 'scientists' among them as well no doubt, most of them wokey-wokes (well, actually all of them), who have never seen any problem with Biden being in the White House. And they are telling you, Iran-backed and funded Hamas, is throwing a few rockets at the evil Apartheid Israel.

I don't wear 'Pringle' cashmere, unless
you include when I spill Pringles crumbs onto
my German brand cashmere.

This is like when Ken Russell brought out his 'sexploitative movie 'Crimes of Passion' and people thought Rick Wakeman had really composed the melody in the theme song 'It's A Lovely Life...'

Where is the border between Iran (which is currently under massive embargoes and restrictions enforced by the USA and NATO) and 'Palestine?' ...Such that the totally broke-as-a-crack-addict Iran, can transport ten thousand missiles to Hamas-controlled Gaza?

With the memory of a two-day old swamp bug, all the wokey-wokes are wailing about the poor oppressed Palestinians, and the evil Zionist JOOOOOZ.

Even my very good friend Moh Hijab went on a tirade this week about the history of the State of Israel and how their leaders had associations with the Nazis and how they killed people blowing up that hotel and all of that. And how the six million present Arab population of Palestine all possessed that land since when the Arab Abraham settled it for them. And when the Arab Adam, was given his commission by the Arab Allah, after he was kicked out of the Arab Garden of Eden - but that was when Allah had a turn being an evil JOOOZ ('royal plural,' right, same as when Allah says 'we'). Sauce for the goose, sauce for the gander.

Arab population in the whole of Palestine 1947 including the present-day land area of 'the State of Israel:' 470,000 maximum.

Present population of Arabs: 6 million. No slavery in Islam, right? Because that's not who has been shipped into there from every Arab place on the planet.

A private salon - 
private means only some
get to go in there.

Do you think, that cousins of the Sultans and Emirs of the Middle East, would be allowed to live in the squalor that the 'Palestinian' Arabs are being forced to live in?

Of course not. 

Meanwhile, the wokey wokes are telling you 'Iran,' right?

And where were the CIA and the FBI when China unloaded the missiles from 'Ever Given?' Because let me tell something for no money - 'sex toys from China' do not get shipped DOWNWARDS from the Mediterranean going OUT of the Suez. This ship was heading the other way - to Gaza.

The war is being mounted by China, with the supine compliance of your friend in the White House, China Joe Biden. 

It's not really the time to indulge people with cavalier attitudes to global security. That kind of thing is apt to mislead people into complacency due to the deliberately contrived atmosphere of sarcasm and idle banter.

We are in deep now with all of this - it has completely escaped people's attention what is really going on. China is taking brazen shots at the West, is what is happening. And they have all too many enablers.

If I do these apparent wild pivots in these Blog articles - well, actually, they are not.

They are to inform you, that other people, with better information generally speaking on a daily basis, than you have... ...know something.

David Solomon. Current CEO of Goldman Sachs,
also, regular EDM trance music DJ at
public live performances and festivals.

And there are also many other people, who have already told you bluntly, they are only in it for themselves anyway: 'what is in it for me?' And they say that enough times for you to get the message that they have absolutely zero interest in you or anyone else gratis -, at all, or your welfare or your safety or anything about you.

And that is because they have the game beat, see. Whereas they are quite sure that you do not (have it beat). They are sure they will survive, and thrive, and that you will by the same token, most probably screw up.

They don't have the game beat. It isn't a game.

Other 'they' are here. And those 'they' will help you. (Some of you caught what was just deleted here - lol) 

War. If war many die; you die too. Better face this now.

Hush! ...Secret!

Right, so that was Fab Morvan from Milli Vanilli, doing the music and total production of that last music vid. Brilliant genuine musician.

Who can doubt the authenticity of The Monkees? Mike Nesmith wrote and produced songs for Michael Jackson, Lionel Ritchie, and others and is still active in the business now at 78. The Monkees were almost the exact reverse of the Milli Vanilli situation, because they were designed as no more than a television program group of actors play-acting a pop group. And then a large market actually gravitated to them knowingly anyway - and it turned out they really could sing and play very well which made them a huge commercial success as an actual live performing act. Their drummer was not originally trained as a drummer, but that didn't stop him becoming way good enough either, along the journey.

...So, the point was raised 'but why should any truly advanced ET Alien group coming here, and possessing so much more advanced technology than we have right now, require a contract, or need to have any kind of contract with us?'

Well okay, let me say this from my best best and direct 'understanding' let's call it - they don't really have a contract that they intend or need to abide by from their side of things. But yes there is an actual agreement, and some circles including in the military who have very great power and a wide brief well know about it and align many things they are doing up with their side of that particular specific bargain.

Laura Eisenhower is not completely wrong...

But she hasn't answered the basic question either. Okay maybe you're telling us 'the truth' Laura, as you know it, but still - why? That is, why the agreement/contract at all? We could not possibly deter them anyway. We could not prevent them doing whatever they wanted to do.

There are two parts to the full answer, one part I will submit to you all now:

Close up of the stage set design from
the pic earlier above.

Let's say for some reason, the whole world just took a poll, about who to give the 'red button' to the most powerful weapon, to. Literally was only one person given that 'button.'

And the officials had placed everyone's name into a large hat -, and pulled out KP's name.

Now I am not saying this intending to animate the lyrics from ABBA: '...the gods rolled the dice, their minds as cold as ice.' I don't say we are dealing with a random type of gambling. Advanced beings are not indulging in some kind of gratuitous 'throwing of the dice' here or anywhere.

So anyway, now we have KP with his hand on the button. Is that okay with you, KP? Everyone else okay with this? Yes? No problems there? Everyone happy?

So we're all happy, right.

Firstly, There IS A Veil

All those who have been reading here for some time, will already be distinguished apart from other people by certain important characteristics.

In any given situation, anyone of those at all, you will access all available data that you can, and you will make strategic analyses, and arrive at the optimum key decision better than anyone else on the planet.

Serge Mansau design

Without noticing it, all of you have had exposure to Democritus, and to Atomic Number Theory, Plane Geometry, Mechanics, numbers in motion, shapes and sizes in motion, and especially exposure to how these things works together aka to the highest form of mathematics, which is known as 'music' at Oxford and Cambridge.

You know which things fit into what spaces. Maybe by now it is instinctive, intuitive, but you know.

And you do know, that if I mislabel something critical, then poor results eventuate in the usual 'cause and effect' structure of our world.

If someone deliberately mislabels something and has you continually using that incorrect label, then they are acting with some kind of mal-intent. They can get people to the point that everyone becomes totally convinced this thing is to be called 'so-and-so' when really, it should be 'such-and-such.'

With this strategic mislabeling, whenever someone goes to pick up that tool for something really important, they pick up the wrong thing.

Fabrica - Engineering research center, Treviso.

And nothing works in that context where that specific tool was needed.

Now once that has become a blanket social 'rule,' then you begin to deal with an additional phenomenon, which is different to the first problem - that is, you have to deal with human emotions themselves, with human feelings, human psychology OVER AND ABOVE the facts and the truth.

We - that is we here (only) - should be able to think of the human existential situation as 'Gaussian:' it consists of a bell-curve of all times, all people, all places, all duration... And, it consists of a large number of items inside those curves.

You should readily be able to perceive that without asking like Mr. Permanently-Seeking-Evidence, 'whether' it is so or not.

Scientists know, that if you tried to 'reason out' a deadly situation such as a tiger leaping out of the bushes at you, and perceive it consciously and 'reason through' a response, you'll be dead.

And so, Mr.Permanently-Seeking-Evidence - this is you. This is your mindset and where you are at.

Tomorrowland - Belgium

'ET Aliens' spring out at you from behind the metaphorical starry shrubbery - and you have to 'reason out' whether they are benign or dangerous. Alternatively, the government is planning a big scam in which 'ET Aliens' are going to spring out at you from behind the Hollywood thicket.

You're dead.

You're already dead meat.

'Jehovah -' well that was simple, he just demanded a few hundred virgins as 'heave offering.'

His obvious power was so superior that of course, it was impossible for Moses to argue too much about it.

But hang on a minute - those 'Tic Tacs' are also vastly superior in their exhibited technology. So what now? More 'heave offering' virgins? We're in big trouble now - we are, afterall, the Mocconna planet: 'we had virgins, but er, we run out.'

So, moving on... (LOL Pivot warning).

Milli Vanilli. Remember them? Were very successful and then ran into a brick wall over the allegations that they were lip-synching their pop songs.

Must be true, right? Everyone said so - the music industry media, the general news media, everyone.

Frank Farian's music was so successful that he became the single biggest producer/artist above and beyond the major studios and he was totally independent. He was so far out in front, they had 'gold albums' - he had diamond ones as well. Frank sang the main male lead of the radio track version of Milli Vanilli's hit songs, but it was a different act where he sang tracks himself unstated and then also used an actual 'stated' singer - who was Bobby Farrell - and that act was Boney M.

All the bad publicity was aimed at two young bunnies with no management - Fabrice Morvan and Rob Pilatus. There is nothing at all in the Wiki entry about Boney M regarding any kind of fraud. Boney M were selling 100, 120 million records per hit - which in those days, still means a billion dollars per hit, when you factor in actual shows and merchandise. Actual billion, those days, actual money.

The substitution 'fraud' was to do with Frank Farian's belief that the market did not want to see his white German face singing that kind of music.

Fabrice Morvan

Only a division of Sony - Arista records - and Morvan and Pilatus, were ever sued.

So far, in this story, the narrative is that the kids in Milli Vanilli are frauds, and not really singers or musicians, and that Arista Records too, for instance, are hiring, contracting the kids not knowing that they are not musical...

Right?

So, Clive Davis, who produced Aretha Franklin, Dionne Warwick, Janis Joplin, Whitney Houston, and on and on and on - Carly Simon, the Kinks, Lou Reed, and on and on; well, he couldn't tell these kids were not musicians, right?

I mean really, how stupid are human beings?

Or just how twisted and deceptive is the social-political-economic structure that all humans are stuck inside of, really?

So seriously, some of you - one in particular - actually knows what 'evidence' is when you see it in front of your eyes, right? You sure about that, right?

Once you see the light, it is
downhill to there.

When you go out into your local city, or your fav hang-outs, you are seeing through a veil. You are looking at the legs of a really swish, naturally tall, lean, ridiculously well-dressed girl, fishnets, designer short pants, very high heels though not thin stiletto heels, more like mules, flowing hair. A few meters up the shopping street, she is not wearing fishnets but opaque nylons... And, she's never been inside any store in your eyesight and recollection, nor ducked into an alley or anything.

No more than fifteen minutes, max. But you never observed the stocking change. And neither did anyone else.

Same as no one here noticed the 'tower of Babylon' in the sci fi art pic in a previous Blog post here, and matched it to the design of Serge Mansau. Or did someone?

And on the Gaussian curve, where does the fifteen minutes of the long-legged woman lie? Meaningless, right? Tiny tiny fraction of the curve.

 

Constitutional Reflectivity

We use 'cause and effect' to establish what we are calling 'logic' in our human mindsets.

Religions are reflections of the prevailing political situations. And that is all that they are.

The religious texts in tyrannies are characterized by threats versus propositions.

Let's go into the future now.

The religious texts of democracies are limitless: there is a 'constitution' around that will suit someone, but not one in particular that must suit all. There are never-ending constitutions, never-ending amounts of religious ideas and beliefs and it's all like a bazaar in which people can just wander around, picking and choosing whichever one suits them for that afternoon.

(I mean none of these things are sayings that are mine, at least not in this lifetime for sure! Other people wrote them a long time ago).

The religious texts of monarchies are high mythologies of the 'Golden Age' from which, out of the dim mists of antiquity, lineages proceed/have proceeded, and which are to be preserved.

Unfortunately, human beings, being what they are, well they adapt to bad situations so much so that at a point, it becomes impossible to prevent them from feeling emotionally displaced, and worried and troubled, when you 'free them' from some, let's say previous condition of enslavement.

To just look at possible narratives from the past about 'encounters' we need look no further than the story of the so-called 'Tower of Babel.'

Islam is not quite certain about exactly why Allah, in that case, decided to destroy the place and confound/confuse the people. Possibly 'Nimrod' (Arabic 'Namrud'/'Numrud') built this structure, possibly with the intent of 'climbing to Heaven to confront and even to overthrow God...'

Or possibly, either the tower was built so that two angels - Harut and Marut - could descend there, and from whence they then taught Mankind various 'magical arts:' which included cosmetics for women, chemistry and poisons, and how to make various weapons of war.

This narrative also exists in the Judaeo-Christian system, via the Book of Enoch certainly, though also in various places of the canonical Bible.

'Tower of Babel' bottle design by 
Serge Mansau.

We are left, however, with a significant contradictory set of narratives: either God destroyed Babylon and the Tower of Babel because Nimrod wanted to 'ascend to Heaven,' or because angels came down there and taught Mankind advanced forms of mischief.

Now frankly, let's assume you or I are actual 'God' in Heaven, and we are sitting there and someone on Earth decides to construct a very tall tower in order to 'get up to us...'

What we do? Logically, we would most certainly go: 'Okay, off you go then. Keep going. No problem.'

Doesn't make sense, right - that any real God would be even in the slightest bit concerned that anyone was going to get to Him any time soon by that means.

Meanwhile, later on in the Bible, this 'God' who meets and greets Moses -, has protruding nostrils ('apayim') on his face, breathes smoke and fire from out of them, spits burning coals down to Earth from out of his mouth, flies in smoke and clouds, lives on a mountain, possesses and hides a treasure, demands a percentage of virgins as 'his sacrificial share,' consumes heifers and goats and sheep and even people, gets angry a lot and destroys stuff.

??

And, even - he has a squadron of winged flying brass-like vipers that he liberally sends out to bite people, including his own 'followers/worshipers.'

This whole thing is not as simple (as many people want to think) as 'oh well, that's because God doesn't exist...'

No. What we can take from all of the accounts may be something along these lines: somebody built a very tall tower. We don't really know why.

Dome angel in Madrid, 
sculpted by Federico Coullaut-Valera.
It is called 'Winged Victory' (Victoria Alada)
and was completed on the 'Day of Athena'
which is 11 October. 

Something 'weird' happened but we really cannot say what, but something did.

And subsequent textual narratives reflect the politics - Jews are essentially enshrining a monarchical form of politics (KING David); Muhammadans are enshrining a Caliph-style tyrannical system (ONE ruler, reflection on Earth OF God, many many threats of extreme violence, plus propositions about what you will get in the future after you are dead, so long as you agree to become a slave).

And now we have Campbell's Tomato Soup Xtians all going along with the standard Jewish narrative - whereas this, is actually what their putative leader (Jesus) actually said about the Jews and their 'Moses:' "Moses gave you the Law, BUT..."

Huh?? But? But what?!

This is real God talking now, right - according to 'Christians' (so they want to claim they are, and from where they are deriving their form of the equivalent nonsense) - and He has just then whole-ly disavowed 'the Law of Moses!' 

Christians make it all the worse, when they insist on calling the individual concerned: 'Jesus' and 'Yeshua' (which is supposedly, the Hebrew form of it). Well, but that is not His name... Is it? This 'Christ' guy is an 'El' figure, not a 'Yeh' figure... (Isra-EL, EL-ijah, Dan-i-EL). So what's His actual birth name and why don't people use it?

The Quran (hopping over to there in my recent type of 'hopping and skipping' that has become all too noticeable, even to me!) - Allah says 'you must call someone and know them if you are to give respect acceptable to me BY THE NAME OF HIS FATHER.'

So - what Muslim can tell me what is this 'name of Muhammad's father' by which you are supposed to call him, to address him, and to refer to him?

Anyone? Anyone?

Dawn... (Refer music below)

...The point of all this, is for me to ask you to please consider, what would happen two minutes after some really good-looking hot ET Alien arrived on your doorstep, with a bottle of 'Big Red' telling you, that she (or he for that matter) was lost and needed to find the house of her (his) grandma's before evening - while batting their eyelids, all lengthened through their advanced arts of cosmetics.

You would annoy them no end, by having far far far too much difficulty, adjusting to a new reality, in which the morals (KP mentioned this) and the ethics and the 'rules' of what is understood to be a Universal Deity to truly advanced sentient beings - was nothing at all like what you (whether right now you care to admit it or not) had become so used to, that every five seconds around these people you would be questioning inside your mind (which they can easily read) whether something was 'right or wrong.' To say nothing of the fact that you would be assigning all kinds of consequences - that canon on through your emotional psychological being as 'perceptual realities.' 'I feel such-and-such.' That is a reality. It is known by psychology as 'perceptual reality.'

How much energy, do you think it is taking, on the part of advanced beings, to underwrite the nonsense going on in your head? 'Underwrite' meaning -, tolerate, and then spend time and energy on, un-doing. All the damn bloody time.

People who are moving fluidly through space-time, understand that 'cause and effect' in time-line frames of reference, is only a small part of logic and reality.

You want to have an advance intelligent being meet with you 'now' and so they can 'give' you some helpful things, maybe even 'hook up' (I believe, is what they say, the kids these days?).

How about you just keep your mind still, and observe...

Plenty of tall towers there!

But note, as you do, that the political situation of 'angels' (a la Harut & Marut) or of whoever is in touch/in tune, with actual Universal 'Deity,' is not tyrannical, certainly not democratic, not monarchical, and not technocratic. So what is it? And how will you 'get into it,' without dragging along all of the baggage of the human race that has built up inside of you, whether you like to acknowledge it all that readily or not, just yet.

'Republic' does NOT, mean, as the current definition maintains 'a type of system in which a state is ruled by representatives of the citizen body.'

It means equality between its members. You need to be equal. To meet any advanced ET Alien overtly, and for them to acknowledge who they are to you and to stay - you have to be their equal.

And you can do that. Yes you can. You can get there.

Understanding The Guardians

I watch a lot of arguments and discussion between people. When you're at Law School (which I was personally in, in the mainstream system though, only for a short while because I rapidly went into a government role that had its own 'in house' system of legal training...) at some point you will participate in 'moot court.' By standard definition this is a 'mock court at which law students argue imaginary cases for practice').

Depending on what your motivations are, you might always throughout the whole of your life, observe these situations - but you might do it with 'an edge,' so to speak, and not simply because you like watching politicians speak.

Supercar Blondie - not 'Barbie' although...
lol Can drive though. Damn yeah!

At a certain stage of your build-up of knowledge or what must pass for it in this world - you will observe that many good people, even those with very sound basic 'positions' on some crucial matter, will, when they are 'flying freely' in the subject, start to parrot off things that have been around for a long time, and that others have said as part of the 'dogma' if you will, of the 'position.' They are not really thinking about what they are saying.

When we are considering the peculiar subject of, say, ET Aliens being here, many people look back into the past and make suggestions a la 'Ancient Astronaut Theorists.' LOL

The fact is, it is wrong to say that anything we can see as 'artifact' from the past - at least in the form of any created object - was ever made by advanced ET Aliens.

Even the pyramids are clearly the work of human beings. There is nothing in respect of 'materials' or construction tools that evidence the advanced technology even of ourselves here today.

Sure it is advanced, and clever and industrious work, - but human, and human from a nascent time of Man's development albeit Mankind possessed great skills and intelligence.

So a great problem with human thought as we see it today, embodied in ideologies,

regardless even of whether they are scientific ones, and not simply religious or belief system ones - is that they are all heavily subject to open blind ignorance as soon as people feel free to speak gratuitously. Which is all the time. It is such a trap too, that in most cases it becomes impossible to explain to that person espousing the position, exactly how off-the-trail they really are. People get things right, and from there, they quickly throw in loads of rubbish that is completely. They never seem to be satisfied just 'sitting pat' on clear-cut truth at all. And staying there.

If you are not already capable of doing it on your own, certainly I could take you, over just a few weeks, stick you in a darkened room most of the time, and at the end, you won't have any difficulty at all knowing the difference between imaginary friends, or hallucinations - and actual encounters with actual people who are not at all from this planet!

There is a widespread modern pop cultural - although, it has more than just the dimension of being a teen thing and is supported by the older generation (on account of the strong Confucianism social environment there) - idea in Korea, that 'K-Pop' groups must not have boyfriends or girlfriends and only 'fans,' and that they cannot even marry anyone. If they do, they must leave the group.

Rabindranath Tagore - great poet of modern Korean
culture. Huh? Oh, but you knew, right?

The story is 'they have the pure morals/moral purity of angels...'

So - would it be possible to point out to Xtian ideologues, for instance, that in the standard New Testament text, 'angels' are really really sexed-up creatures??

No, you could not say that to anyone; no one would believe it. But it is there starring everyone right in the face and no one appears to 'get' the words they are reading.

Alternatively, the Quran makes a fuss of Jesus coming back to 'break crosses' because the competing ruling Abd' ul Malik wanted to envision the destruction of the Byzantines. He even caused Islamic eschatology to say that the rise of an apostate regime would stop at 'Rum.' He meant - Constantinople; which he wanted to take complete control of and which he believed would remain an ideological battleground into the future, even after he took it by force.

Why couldn't Jesus come back to um, I dunno - say, Lhasa and 'break Buddhas?' (At least that would have shown whoever wrote the Quran really did know the future and things that hadn't happened yet at the time of the first exposure of the Quran) Or how about Sri Lanka and break 'idols?' Because none of those places had any relevance to Abd' ul Malik!

...So.

Where does this leave us?

The big three religious/philosophical/morality systems in the world: pop Xtianity, Islam, and Vedic (which includes Buddhism) though possibly with some exceptions with the Vedas because they are so diverse and wide-apart morally in places - all have this concept of 'judgment' because you have or are 'breaking' someone else's law; it's not your personal internal individual law code -, it is from outside of you/outside of your life.

Suzanne Chesterton - 'trance singer'
lol... Is. Honest. Nothing more, nothing less.

And all of them force you to this notion that there is someone or something outside of you, that has so much greater power than you, that you must accept their/its enforcing, delivery downwards onto you, of its rules. And you have to fit into it, because you are essentially not 'it' inside.

However, there is an entirely different notion that is quite unfamiliar to most of the world, and it is around in places, one of those being the texts which speak of 'Guardians' that are subtly here and extremely powerful but whose aggression and aggressive is hidden because they don't even want to be known of as forceful and overpowering. They have no money, no wealth, no position, no social entitlement, but they are really, the actual gatekeepers to you. To what becomes of you.

And, they are hidden, in disguise, but actually present under your nose. All the time.

There's documents about them. People don't talk about those. If they have even encountered them, they think it's just a speculation. Virtually a pointless speculation. Taoism has some similar ideas. And even there, in that ethnic context, it is Confucianism that rules on the surface.

You see, it is utterly cruel to expose to everyone else, that you got out, and that they didn't and nor could they ever at this stage of their um 'development.' So there is a gulf between 'you' (if you 'get' the idea, the key - the golden key, which isn't 'gold' at all, of course), and the values that everyone else has, and what they all hold is important and valuable...

So...

This track is a ballad, not really the style that we have been posting recently, but it is from Sue McLaren and Suzanne Chesterton.

It's called, 'Guardian.' Interesting vid.