Evans-Pritchard

E. E. Evans-Pritchard was a leading twentieth century anthropologist whom Wikipedia describes as 'instrumental in the development of social anthropology.'

He was Professor of Social Anthropology at Oxford University from 1946 - 1970.

Fundamental to all modern systems of politics - and how political strategists and their financial backers drive the process - is the understanding described by Evans-Pritchard as 'segmentary opposition.' This is an idea which says that opposed social and political groups suddenly find solidarity in the face of external perceived threats.

"Well I'll be... Yer jest like one of us,
aincha Virgil?'

If ET Aliens had have landed on the Capitol Mall two years ago, and said: 'take us to your President,' 75 mill plus 1 additional person would have all mailed in a message to the Aliens - 'Not my President!'

Today, only 75 million other people would shout: 'Not my President!'

All the same, the working theory that is currently being used by people who could possibly procure a kind of scam 'visitation' ('visitation' by the way, in English, means a ghostly apparition and not, someone just 'visiting') by ET Aliens, is that were they to present the ET Aliens as ghastly and inimical to humanity - then according to the theories of Evans-Pritchard and others, it would act as a 'unifying mechanism' with which to underpin the establishing of a genuine global leadership with all the legal powers and authority of government with armed services and police.

You would suppose, not that one actually knew, certainly, but using rationality and common sense, you would suppose that super-advanced ET Aliens would have knowledge about 'social anthropology' at least as good as E. E. Evans-Pritchard, and likely, a lot better knowledge.

Nothing like Michael Jackson...

I'm certain that it would not be pleasant for me to meet ET Aliens of the kind recently suggested here by the most active recent comment contributor - that 'might have' landed in Ruwa, Zimbabwe - who looked like Michael Jackson and who had really big heads and very large eyes. Uh-uh; not me, 'no thank you Virgil. I mean, Mista Tibbs. No thank You!' 

In The Heat Of The Night: 'No one EVER comes here and visits me - not even ET Aliens, Virgil.'

Well, Rod Steiger's character never quite said that... LOL

And Sidney Poitier's character never quite managed to say this line, either: 'Because if they did, Sheriff Gillespie, you and I both would want them to pull whitey down off the Hill...'

When Major Ed Dames Met The Alien

By now, it will be pretty clear to all of you who watch television, or YouTube, that the first key move of all modern propaganda is to establish within 48 hours of any given significant event, who 'perpetrated it,' if it is something superficially negative - like for instance, the events of 9/11.

And then, second-up, as fast as possible, numerous astro-turfers go into play, laying down suppressive narratives or making derisory comments about whichever important or expert figure they want to switch the narrative away from.

For example, when retired General Stubblebine went into the media to say that according to his analysis of vision and photographic after-shots, no 'plane' went into the Pentagon, immediately thereafter a tremendous amount of the American media went into trying to discredit Stubblebine. Within ten years, George Clooney featured in a sarcastic representation of Stubblebine's career, in the 2009 film 'The Men Who Stare At Goats.' The movie itself was made both with the technical assistance and later, the public approval, of propaganda arms of the US Military and various active military commanders.

Stubblebine's last mission command, was as global military director and head, of all high altitude (by that time it was more than just 'high altitude') photographic analysis.

He retired at age, decorated, and with honors.

One of those under his direct command earlier on, was Major Ed Dames, who had been engaged in programs and projects which to this day I cannot - and nor can others - actually detail, but which were given various cover stories. 

Ed Dames is excoriated widely.

All yours, Bill. 'Jimmy Brings.'

As you know, the Covid-19 Relief Funding Budget, had several side-issues that were related to its being passed, one of which is this famous/infamous deadline (looming in the next few months) by which time the DoD and Combined US Intel groups all must render a report on what they hold on ET's, UFO's, and ET Aliens.

Now unless they give you details and make at least some serous references to the 'High Altitude Analysis' Unit and Major Ed Dames actual meeting with an ET Alien, then the reports are not merely 'incomplete' but an outright, outrageous lie.

Ed Dames is still around but his life is in some danger.

Because Ed was told something by the ET Alien and following his report the Military chiefs scattered like hens in a hen-house with a fox in there on the loose.

And they basically split into two camps, with the predominant camp being peopled by those who have since virtually completely taken over the running of the United States.

Now our recent friend to these pages, KittyP, has given us the perspective that he doesn't 'have a view' on 9/11 and although I am sticking words into his mouth, no doubt, if I hadn't already framed things in terms of what the most senior officer in charge of all photographic analysis has already said - he would suggest 'there is no EVIDENCE...'

Yes there is evidence. There is evidence that a cruise missile was targeted at, and flew into, the Pentagon.

And there is top-flight analysis saying so as well.

I like these, myself, but Jimmy said 'no can
do; not for the bush, right?'

With regard to Major Dames, he was given some very brief but astounding 'information,' you would have to call it, regarding the expansion of the use of satellites orbiting the planet into the thousands (which has happened, of course) and the problems and risks that would ensue from relatively rare kinds of solar flares which would disable those satellites, which the people of the world had by that time all become reliant on in their lives.

Ever since the Dames meeting and that specific 'information,' those who have been on the inside, have created a 'cover story' so that people who were not on the inside, would not be able to maliciously exploit the situation that 'could' eventuate - namely, the destruction of the satellite networks system.

But the real reason some certain people detest Ed Dames, is that his story of the so-called 'Kill Shot' is a cover for something.

And I would be very surprised if you were not able to at least speculate on what that is, KittyP. Go on. Have a go at it.

Where The Three Roads Meet

One of the biggest difficulties in getting straight-down-the-center-line reports of anything significant these days, is the sheer overburden of utter nonsense which somehow gets a huge platform anyway or is thrown onto the pyre of 'academic research.'

There are so many 'competing theories' or hypotheses about any given (new) subject, that no one will ever work their way to something that a sufficient number of objective inquiring minds can look at and form a consensus about - far less 'prove' with science.

Christopher Hitchens was a great speaker and he had what I consider a decent British accent, Richard Dawkins has a very poor, lower class accent in my view...

The fact that one has a good accent, or that one has some University credentials, still needs to be taken in perspective with what actual things they say: Hitchens verbally pouring scorn in his tone of voice onto something absent of any actual supporting argument, means that he doesn't have an argument!

Dawkins is oft heard to use the phrase - 'there is not a shred of evidence...'

During the Vietnam war, USAF radio operators in C135e's, would take down messages, all crystal clear and accurate and fully verified later on - and yet, the equipment through which they were claiming to hear the transmissions, never recorded any such messages. I know this as a personal matter of experience with several people in that official area. CO's knew, and CO's used these messages, but no reports were ever officially filed, other that the CIA did have knowledge of it because the word got out and there were soft inquiries made.

The reason people like Russell Targ and others drifted into the California 'out there' scene, is not because they did not have a basis to go there. They did. But in the first place, 'meditation' and that kind of thing, also gives people some psychological support that they can 'control' something at least about what goes on with the stuff they have been meddling with.

This morning I went down to a major Department Store - I know where it is located, it's been there since before I was born, and there is substantial confidence that I have, that when I go to that address, it will actually be there.

Guess what? It was there too.

There is no such similar clear-cut stable location - any formal publicly-known address - to which you can send messages and have ET Aliens (for example) respond to your questions, and then, that presumes they care to or even want to at all.

I mean - look at it this way, and which is a much more significant way to look at it (given recent well-known incidents): you are the US Navy, and the ET Aliens have been messing with your missions and operations. Now, you just want to get a direct, cogent, official message out to them.

How do you go about doing this?

APB? All channel broadcast? What?

There is no way.

You and I, we just want a 'show-ground' ride and some whiz-bang 'evidence' for our eyes and ears - we don't have any technical, military operations agenda or 'serious' standing.

Ah but, you see, the Monroe Institute does have technological ways-and-means to contact, to interface. It basically consists of micro-level EMF scanners and some digital magnetic field propagating computers. Except they carefully look at even those people with a stack of money who want to go into their programs, and not everyone gets a go at the machinery, regardless of money.

...I am trying to find a way, to 'hand across' something substantial, but also avoid divulging the science and maths, which is at this stage absolute top secret stuff. What I can tell you is that CERN is well off the trail, except they have deadly dangerous high levels of energy being exploited, and it could lead to accidents - but some American scientists have been down the 'hot paths' for decades. And it involves ideas stemming from Planck stuff and 'sine curves.' Wikipedia (and I'm not going to link that actual entry here) when dealing with the key subject, says 'the problem was solved by Planck when...' No it wasn't. Planck described something, he did not explain it. Planck's description in the related thing is just a derivative equation, it's not a formula.

Okay, let me go at a complete tangent.

Blue lava volcano in Indonesia

Snakes can 'see' blue and green colors. And, they can 'see' down into the UV range at nighttime.

It is fundamentally incorrect to say their tongues flick to 'pick up odor molecules' because there is no such mechanism, not even in our own sensory system. They pick up molecules, yes, but these are only first-stage filtered by the sustentacular cells - they don't transfer truly critical information at all.

When people widely sweep these 'there is no evidence' accusations, well here is one that is true but no one wants to admit it: there is absolutely zero evidence that chemical molecules are the actual information transfer process for our sense of smell. They are part of it and the dichroic electron spin function of the molecules is the real information transfer process. No one has exhaustively researched this area up to this very instant.

Snakes 'see' blue and green to catch their prey and they flick their tongues to 'feel' whether the prey is alive. Because electron spin changes when things are dead - or synthetic.

Why they 'see' UV is because they are deadly afraid of what is there 'hidden' in the ultraviolet range...

Typical California 'woo woo' place... Cute, but.

When Sponge Rob expresses the average person's sentiment that we haven't got any power - you can kill a snake with UV. Any snake. Or reptile.

You can, or at least in the ancient mythological religious narrative, someone did, slaughter Sodom and Gomorrah with sulfur from the skies - which burns blue, by the way.

Sulfur burns blue because the heat is so hot, and the thermal frequency so high, that it is in the blue color of the spectrum.

Ordinary calcium burns purple or violet. Things go systematically ('maybe...' lol) on a curve from low frequency (red colors) to higher frequencies (blue+), right? RIGHT? Nod nod wink wink.

Yes. This is called 'alchemy.' Alchemy is, as you know, a way that clever scientists, disguised what they were saying to unwanted eyes. It's not some silly way to make gold from out of lead!

What is the physics of 'where the rainbow ends?'

The Fairy Queen tells something very specific to Thomas Rhymer in the poetic fairy tale. She does not say the wide road leads to Hell, what she says is 'here is the wide road of the Wicked...'

The Earth - the human race - is a crossroads. It contains all things, converging right here.

Things That Really Happened

In 1956, a concert in Moscow of Swan Lake, performed by Maya Plisetskaya, resulted in the KGB running through the audience to stop people from applauding too loudly, and literally dragging some theater-goers out of the theater kicking, screaming, and scratching.

For years, the ballet company had been suppressed by the senior bureaucrats for being 'too erotic' and the opera music 'mutilated.'

Two years later, in 1958, at the Papal Conclave, the first pick of who should be 'the next Pope' went to Cardinal Siri of Genoa - who, as soon as he had received the vote, also got a slip of paper from 'a foreign emissary,' which said (and this is confirmed from numerous reliable authoritative sources and never has been denied by anyone) that if Siri accepted, he would immediately be killed, and all of his family and friends would be killed as well. In fact, the actual closest person to the whole affair, reported that the message was even far worse than that, in that the Vatican City was being threatened with a nuclear weapon!!

Today, I personally don't worry so much about suppression by the general media on matters political - I worry about the fact that you will not find one single photograph or reference on-line anywhere, about why a great French fashion designer like Yves Saint Laurent, was so famous.

...Instead, what you will find are many references to his homosexuality, and of course, even the gigantic investment bank which owns his label today, never refers to his actual name, but only to their products as 'YSL' using a branded logo design to express the line.

This year, the Pantone Color of the Year, is 'Ultimate Grey.'

What made Yves Saint Laurent really famous on the world stage, is that he designed for Plisetskaya and also for Marlene Dietrich.

Yves Saint Laurent and Plisetskaya

In the case of Plisetskaya, he radically altered the usual 'red and black' palette for the productions of Bizet's Carmen Suite Ballet, and during one performance only, at Covent Garden, the costumes were all in Yves Saint Laurent's (later) trade-mark colors of grey, white and yellow. This was such a truly shocking departure that it scandalized the press, but was so amazing visually, especially when presented by Plisetskaya, that Saint Laurent's fame was fully established in the paramount Western fashion capital of London.

If 'the big thing' that present-era global socio-political elites want to shove down everyone's throats is homosexuality, then why though, is there this much much deeper level subtle criminality to do with mutilating the history of what actually made those significant figures - who may indeed have been homosexual - who they became?

Why suppress the very exceptional incidents themselves, that placed those figures onto the world stage - and to be acclaimed for those particular elements of their work?

You can buy a lot of expensive rubbish from LVMH under the brand label of 'YSL' but none of it is what Yves Saint Laurent was famous for. 

What the psychological manipulators are trying to do, and very successful on the whole, is convince you that it was the homosexuality, that was important, and not the work or the ideas that those people had.

Dietrich wearing Yves Saint Laurent

But let me assure you of this - if you decide tomorrow, that you are going to be 'gay' when previously you were some other thing, it will not make you Yves Saint Laurent!

These miscreants that run all of this agenda, are not supporters of homosexuals or homosexuality - they are abusers of homosexuals, denying them their own history of actual creativity and innovation and achievement, supplanting all of that with 'industrial scale' political semiotics and propaganda.

At schools, you will be taught that you have the right 'to be gay...'

You will never be told you have the right to stick it in the faces of the Politburo elite or the global agenda elite, or that you can distinguish yourself above the pack and ahead of what your puppet-masters have planned for you to do. You will never be told that you can be unique and self-made, or at least 'self-actualized.'  

Actual gay people who think that the 'gay rights political agenda' or the 'rainbow movement' is going to enhance their rights or their lives - are fools.

Thomas The Rhymer

"All Hail, Mighty Queen of Heaven! No equal ever before I have seen"

"Nay nay, Rhyming Thomas. That name is not for me.

"I am but the Queen of Fairyland, and I've come to visit thee."

...And riding off the both of them together, over hill and dale and desert wide as far as the eye can see,

Until at last the Lady spake: "Dismount thee, Thomas, now, and mark you well,

"For wonders I shall show you, three."

Schiehallion, Scotland.
'Schie' means 'fairy.'