Film And 'Aerial Hycon 73B'

So, this is the thing that was used in U-2 recon flights in the early Sixties. They used wet-plate high resolution film made from ESTAR Base. And these sorts of cameras can film at incredibly high speeds and with extraordinary precision measurements if they are land-mounted as a so-called 'cinetheodolite.' 

Now... here is the thing though. Sure the film can be - in fact has to be - processed very quickly from when the exposures were shot. But, when it comes to the detailed, in-depth analysis of the processed negatives, all of that work was done in CIA highly private facilities, well, I don't know all the places but I do know some of the places, and I've mentioned them before. Highly skilled people at special divisions of Eastman-Kodak 'High Altitude Labs' did the work. And maybe some people at Boston University did as well.

A modern cinetheodolite.

The NASA astronaut Gordon Cooper was rather famous or infamous, if you like, for having set up an Askania Cinetheodolite system at Edwards Air Force Base in 1957 - which subsequently managed to capture a flying saucer object that made no sound landing and taking off. The shot film was processed into its film negatives and Cooper was told by the Pentagon to make no prints of it, but to send the whole lot by courier in a locked courier pouch to them. He viewed the negatives, not having been told not to look at them, and he has on many occasions said that what was on the film confirmed what his ground people who set up the camera system told him, which was that they had seen and filmed a flying saucer that particular early morning in question.

And... the film has never been able to be tracked down since. Although there is no doubt that it was shot, processed, and sent to the Pentagon.

But I'll tell you where it is - that is to say, where it went and what happened next.

These kinds of films go to CIA special photographic analysis people - the same people I mentioned in some paragraphs above. Firstly, because they were the best at the job, secondly because all the significant classified U-2 film went to them (since CIA ran all the U-2 projects at the time) and thirdly, because this Cooper film being to do with 'unusual aerial phenomena that had been filmed and treated as classified material' could have been 'captured' into the CIA 'intellectual property territoriality,' if I might put it that way. 

Now what did they do with it?

F-35 over Edwards Air Base.

I'll tell you what a smart person would have done with it, assuming they had no previous knowledge of what the 'strange objects' were - a smart person would have set up more cameras all over the place everywhere they had any indication might be the kind of place these things were 'appearing;' at least, especially like this one - at an actual Air Force Base!

The common 'theory' has always been something along the lines of: See? The US had this secret advanced aircraft R&D program and when Cooper filmed one of these objects, the CIA just took his film and 'disappeared it.'

Well now you see, that wouldn't be right, because if they had this stuff at all themselves, why did they let Francis Powers get shot down in a high risk mission when they could have just silently flown in a flying saucer thingy and even landed it close to where they wanted to film something, and then silently and at ridiculously high speed, fly the thing back out again?

Nah. They never had anything like it. 

So they never just 'buried the film' because they never had any reason of their own secrecy, to do that. What they did was what smart people would have done, namely, set up more cameras and shoot more film.

So the question to ask Ratcliffe today is, (Part A) 'Does the Pentagon have ten years of film showing absolutely no further instances of UFOs like the initial one Cooper filmed at Edwards? (Part B) Did the CIA analyze the first film and what analysis did they make? And, (Part C) Does the Pentagon have ten years of film showing many incidents similar to the one that Gordon Cooper's ground people filmed in 1957?

And if the answer to Part C is 'yes,' then, what did they do about it and/or what happened next if anything?

There were a lot of great pilots, but this was certainly
one of the best - John Young. Passed away in 2018,
at 87 years of age.

Because as of now, today, we have a Part D as well, being that Navy has also got film of the same thing but very recently filmed.

So anyway, I happen to know the full and complete answer to all parts of what is essentially, just one question. And there is nothing I can say about that. At the moment.

...I just had to delete about seven or eight paragraphs that came next!

Anyway. I'll try my best.

And this is not the place to go into details.

NASA is scientists and engineers and doctors and academics and technicians, and some accountants and a few politicians masquerading as managers and program directors.

CIA, on the other hand, believe it or not, is filled with Christians; they are literally religious people and not only because they pretended to be that just to insert themselves into the Serbian and the Croatian communities in Yugoslavia that one time. There are two and a half (roughly) billion adherents to Christianity on the planet today.

There most certainly are atheists in the CIA, too, but there are absolutely zero agnostics, and I'll tell you why. These people - all of them - spend the whole of their lives learning things, every-thing, things. They know it all, I'm not being funny, because really, they pretty much do. And, they are experts at making judgments about what they read and see - so they either have, on the basis of what they've read, decided there is no God, or, that there is. The baseline of their general knowledge is so high in reality, and also they never would allow themselves the fault of it not being adequately high at minimum, so you see, they are compelled, psychologically within themselves, to 'come to a judgment;' come to a decision.

For years and years every man and his dog opined that when we met ET, it would confront and challenge religious beliefs; it doesn't. It makes people genuinely scared, especially when the real person in front of them is scary cool! So either this is a literal demon, or a demonic entity masquerading as a humanoid person, or a 'fallen angel' - as the typical pop religious paranoid raving has it. Or it's an alien person from far far away at another location, another planetary system or something, just really far away. Who has come here, for some reason, that we don't know about other than what we have various speculations about, which 'they' (the 'others') never confirm or deny.

Jesus, being part Egyptian, drinks beer too, you know!

If it is a demon, this does not, confront or in any way challenge typical religious beliefs. In fact that buttresses the paranoid ideas and fears.

This is what got Claudie Haignere into a spot of bother back a bit - she really got a touch freaked out there.

So I am going to give you all, atheists, agnostics and believers -, the exact same 'advice,' Saint Paul did, way back a long time ago: 'Do not let anyone envious, and... ...intruding into those messages which you have been given access to, which he has not seen, vainly confident in his Earthly mind, force you into things different to what you yourself already know but yet cannot disclose.'

'That Cows Have Tails.'

So, by now this figure should be dancing in your head: $2,500. 

TWO THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS PER BOTTLE!

That's what that damn Evelyn & Crabtree silly thing is.

That's reality. And we only talk about reality here.

Are there real, genuine ET aliens around and can you meet them?

What is that? Starlight going 'up,' or a star coming 'down?'

So, this French astronaut from out of the European Space Agency blurted out a very silly thing one time, and nearly ended up out of a window for it.

Big 'conspiracy theory' promoters all say she has had encounters with ET aliens and tried to warn the world of an impending invasion, before she tried to commit suicide - but failed. The public factual account though, is that she had an episode of 'burn out' and got into some personal emotional, maybe psychological depression or something.

It doesn't matter to me either way - she is currently head of various big time organizations and doesn't do any more stunts like she did that one time.

Now look, all of us that have been in some kind of confidential official government programs 'know things,' some of which are dead boring, others of which would get you killed quite easily.

There was this huge banker/entrepreneur here in Australia in the Eighties - name of Laurie Connell; (my sister actually worked for him) and my business partner knew him personally, was godparent to one of his daughters. We both 'were allowed' up to the top secured floors of a government office when the then Prime Minister Bob Hawke came over to either scold Laurie and his mates, or maybe lecture them or whatever - but Bill and me were the guys (and Bill was a hugely successful top-of-the-tree local businessman of senior age) who brought the tea and coffee in to those meetings. Not even the State government official cooks, service staff whatever, were allowed in there personally - which kind of does mean that, well, yeah, some monkey business was at hand.

Look, they're just doing their best. Do you see it
in context now? Just, doing they're best. Not 'the boss.'

So anyway, Laurie died pending a huge trial over the 'collapse' of his merchant bank.

'Now what do you want me to do?'  - I asked someone from an agency that I once worked for. 'Do you want me to get in front of a judge and swear that, whatever the secret is, blah blah blah...'

Which judge would that be - who never borrowed money from Laurie's bank and didn't owe him a bundle when the bank went down during the Eighties' Crash?

Which judge would that be then... So I turned down the offer. And it is kind of an undeniable fact, that the then head lawyer of a Royal Commission, John Quigley, made that offer to me. He is the current Attorney General for the State of Western Australia, which is a prominent new Southern Province of China - so don't go banging on his door, he is busy and he's a nice guy as well and I like him and he knows me these days in a different context altogether and he probably wouldn't even put 'two and two' together visually, but if he were told, he'd fall off his chair again. He does amazing things for people in genuine need, so just don't.

Unless you got a million bucks from a newspaper and even then I wouldn't say anything anyway, but you could try. 

Same way, which 'top-silk' identity in the USA doesn't owe Jamie Dimon? Well, I mean Dimon is a rank nobody; he is just a front. But you get the main point here.

I keep my mouth shut, and I'll never say anything. I'll never expand on what I just said and no one can make me. Sleeping dogs and all that.

The 'Valknut.'

Anyway, so this French woman - Claudie Haignere - who has been up into space in the Mir, I think, she said something very silly about space-time once you move away from large mass sources of obtaining gravity.

Here's the really important thing that I can say on this ridiculous 'out there' subject of ET aliens, and it comes in the form of a question that has been posed elsewhere in mass circulation journals of some respectability: 'Are the ET aliens super condescending?'

LOL

Are they...?

Could be.

Claudie is behaving these days, it seems.

But this is not about what ET aliens could care less about - because they are very condescending towards human beings, as far as I can ascertain - it is about what official government and MIC figures want the public to know; that is, not to know, about.

There is some, possibly apocryphal, story that a friend of mine told me recently, about Davy Crockett: one time, when there were a swarm of flies and insects annoying his party around this campfire, see, one of his companions asked him why, if there were a God, and that God was good, why then did He create flies... ...and biting insects?

To which Crockett rejoined:

'Well, if there were flies that had religion, maybe they would be asking why in the heck did God create cows with tails and human beings with hands!'

Bridget Nielsen - has a lot to say...
LOL
She has a women's retreat in Maui, very recommended.

That cows have tails is a fact.

The so-called apocryphal Gospel of James, contains these 'fairy tales' about Mary the mother of Jesus being sent to 'a temple' and raised there, and looked after and fed by 'doves' descending down from heaven.

And, in those other canonical passages about when this 'unseen' wind, breath, force, whatever you want to call it, descends down on people, in one case John the Baptist, and in other cases various followers in different circumstances, you can see it in the form of a dove.

And, in the Norse Eddas, when the Valkyries come down and pick up the souls of slain warriors fallen in battle, they make a loud screeching noise like falcons. 

The source words are: Peri-asteron, Valk-eiree, and Peregrine, and you can add even 'Desire' to those. (De Sidere Esse - Latin phrase).

None of them means what everyone thinks or widely says, they mean. So you probably should actually look all of them up yourself, and you might find they are all '2,500 dollar' words, and not just David Attenborough vocab.

Three delta symbols entwined with the peaks pointing upward, is a military field signal symbol for calling down for 'help.' And the same three-part symbol facing downwards, means this is the 'help.' In the German and Norwegian and Swedish armies it is called the 'Valknut.'

Nora... ...in Maui

However, I do take the same view that both Corinthians 11:10 proposes, as well as one of our friends, Bridget -, namely, that it is predominantly women who are 'vulnerable;' to being 'picked up.' Not 'men fallen in battle.' Or maybe men, but I don't know because I haven't ever been actually on a field of battle, although I have seen people massacred. Apparently though, no one much is really interested in human males.

So, I am unable to say how successful any male here is likely to be, in attracting over some super-condescending, albeit incredibly intelligent and knowledgeable ET alien who might, or might not, be in the business of messing with human genes. And that is despite that I have handed over every single piece of info you will need, even where to typically find...  

So that's enough of this now. Never ever again, shall we speak of this nonsense because it's all just entertaining nonsense.

...Until next time when we need some more entertaining. And some 17x speed of sound Kratos Dynamiks UAV flies past yer head in a hurry for some reason.

Because you know, we smart humans invented them, right? Can't swat flies or kill germs, but yeah... 17x S-of-S, no problem. And the band played 'believe it if yer can.'

3 Delta Down. Keep your eyes open.

The Problematic Hunt Brothers

Nelson Bunker Hunt, the leader of four brothers, was charged in 1985 with manipulating and attempting to manipulate the price of silver futures contracts. (The eldest of the brothers, Haroldson Hunt, was never involved in the silver incident at all - because he had been lobotomized for 'erratic behavior.' He lived to old age).

Nelson Bunker had, for more than a decade earlier, been accumulating large amounts of silver - to the extent that the media regularly says that he tried to 'corner the silver market' and to 'gain a silver monopoly.'

There's some silver for you...

Well that's an impossibility for several reasons - the chief one being that the Earth, the ground, rocks and stones, are the source of silver, not some human being. To have an actual monopoly, you need to be the sole source of something, to be able to control the source, and not merely to have the power to constrain delivery. Because as every economics student knows, it is the hardest task of all, the be able to protect a real monopoly.

Generally speaking, governments too don't like you to have a monopoly. Not on anything people really need. So you'll find you are up against them as well.

To make money from a monopoly, you have to possess the actual source, and be able to disguise that you have it, and then, give the impression that no one really wants the thing anyway... ...all the while taking advantage of selling into a steeply rising market, and controlling supply as you go so that the steepness of the demand curve versus its supply, is not negatively affected.

It is very very hard to even give examples of real monopolies - usually, you have effective monopolies, and still, academics will argue over definitions and various nuances of the thing.

Through the secret door, right? To the
magical realm of mythical 'profits...'
You have to be able to find such a door in the first place! 

Here is an example of a current-era effective monopoly - it's something that comes from only one place with respect to the nomenclature (similar to what the French government has achieved with the word 'Champagne'), and has been 'owned' by the Chinese government for at least ten years now, placing the actual supply and processed output, into, well, in fact what looks like exactly zero worldwide supply whatsoever. Just what they are doing with any new production I do not know.

Technically, the Chinese government cannot 'own' the sandalwood trees nor even their output in India, but reports put the whole situation down to 'widespread corruption.' All that actually happened was that the supply itself became ridiculously minuscule, even though in reality, the auction prices themselves actually fell.

In the commercial, the retail scene, the world's acknowledged number 1 producer of a product known as 'Mysore Sandalwood' cologne and aftershave - Evelyn & Crabtree, an American-owned originally British manufacturer, seems to have either literally gone broke, or been split up into a Canadian arm which produces a different style and branding level, of product, while the American arm has completely abandoned its previously top selling lines.

There is no suggestion of 'China corruption' there, of course. Right?

Anyway, a few of us over here, ten years ago and more, would go through at least one to two bottles of this concoction each every year. It was okay, well, yeah it was pretty good, but frankly, I am not the world's greatest fan of sandalwood, though this particular product was very good in its own right. I used to complain when it was going for around fifty dollars a bottle at the end of production - when it was oh perhaps twenty or thirty for many many years previously.

And the price? Well go on then - you look it up on Ebay...

Could I find something of exactly the same standard and quality somewhere - elsewhere -  today? Yes absolutely. Apparently no one else knows how though - since you can see what the prevailing price is for 'old stock' and that is, if you can even get your hands on any!

Is this the monopoly I was earlier speaking of? No, it is not. I don't even think this really is a monopoly as such - it's more of a 'collector's rarity' thing with a limited market. But, it will serve to show what utterly ludicrous prices are commanded by such things where somehow, the market, or 'a' market suddenly takes it into its head to go after that thing with a fervor.

Bunker Hunt also funded a bunch of Christian University Campus organizations the largest one being what is today known as CRU, which is a so-called 'New' Evangelical Christian organization. They are going to secure a monopoly on God, salvation and you going to heaven, by re-branding Jesus. I say these things quite deliberately to provoke not necessarily you, the reader, or at least that one who may be a Christian and an Evangelical and so on - but just those guys with a ton of money and unlimited stupidity. Too much money, really, for one to suspect that they really have a purchase on what it is the Good Book teaches.

'Sufficient money' will do. And let it fall as the morning dew... Of course, this is in Christianity - in Islam, adequate provision is called 'rizq' in Arabic. Sadly. So we don't need any of that today. No 'rizq' today, thank you. 

The Problem With 'Disclosing'

In this case, sadly, I don't exactly mean 'Disclosure' as in you know ET!!

I mean if I open up a little more about my past history...

This creates its own problems because more often than not people, some at least, will be apt to go 'oh he's big-noting himself/name-dropping' whatever.

Macalister Mansion, Penang. This is where I lived.

But I'm doing it now to give some basis to how I ever would have been able to get 'access' in the first place. I'm not an industrial chemist and I know little to nothing at all about engineering; at one time I had a strong grasp on circuit design and some cutting edge ideas to do with electronics. God I'm look a million years old now, I'm less than useless in that area now - I've lost it all because my head is full of 'other matters.' Besides which it's all 'drop in' modules and software in chips. Nobody's addressing 'new function innovation' anyway.

So look, my adoptive step-brother was head of the Secret Intelligence Service of a country won't say which one and you'll prolly guess it wrong anyway. So don't. He is by birth from literally the same family as Kamal Adham the founder of Saudi Secret Intelligence.

One of my uncles I think I've said before, was the second of the two-man team who had sole access to the secured 'special ingredient' Wrigleys stuck into their latex processing for chewing gum manufacture. Whenever they used the ingredient, both people had to bring one key each to open the safe.

I'm going to post a pic of a house that I lived in for a few weeks and then we moved next door to a MUCH BIGGER place where we stayed for years and years. The American ambassador's residence up the road a few miles, not many, was EVEN BIGGER STILL.

Sir Norman Macalister, the governor of Prince of Wales Island, built the house in this pic. It is today, an hotel - of 'eight rooms.'

And... it's a hotel now

Even back then when I was a kid, it never had a grassed front yard, only granite rock chips or 'blue metal rocks' or whatever you call the stuff. Sayid Arafin, one of my dad's teaching student lecturers, lived there with his family - because he had a big family and he was the only local with the necessary aristocratic profile to 'accept' what the others were too shy to take. For some reason my mother didn't like the place and we went to an even bigger, but more sprawling place next door.

...So this US major, see, escorted around by the US ambassador surname 'Gordon' who went on to work for several White House administrations and had even at one time been involved in the Nixon, I think, earlier failed tilt - well he had some 'grunts' and some other muscle with heavy machinery, cut a patch in the rainforest, and they literally descended an air-conditioned PX cabin there, while they were 'exploring' something. Next to that, a quarter mile away, was the mine where the local government cut the granite rocks from. And what were they doing in the 'small patch' right in the middle of very very deep and thick multi-layered rainforest and canopy?

Well, I can't say, see.

And you wouldn't even believe me anyway. It was 'just a project' and nobody would have asked any questions. And those that actually knew, well, they were people who kept their mouths shut - and they were mostly academics but in uniform. One of them - Munroe Leaf (well his actual name was 'Monroe;' Wilbur Monroe Leaf) - was one of those academics. And I've mentioned him before in connection with my personal life. Man, come on guys - I'm not sure that you are EVER going to get any closer to it all. I mean - there is Cathy O'Brien... You know, funny, she is about the same age as me. Everyone thinks she's nuts, I think. I think she's probably just 'injudicious.'

Cathy O'Brien - conspiracy theorist 'MKUltra' LOL

Anyway.

And I absolutely 100% ironclad guarantee you, that at least half a dozen different objectives were part of that 'thing' going on in the rainforest: taking flora samples, testing the earth for hundreds of yards down, photographing 'new plant species,' testing new equipment, seeing if they could find or extract new chemical compounds from whatever was there. Even testing the Eastman High Altitude cameras to see what they could 'see' into the forest canopy. So... So, tucked away in all of that - which were all absolutely important, valid things - were these academics, see; and what they were doing, which no one was allowed to ask about.

Anyway. Any-w-a-a-a-y... 

There's lots of hard 'legacy' I have retained from those days - those days when my sister's godfather, head of station Singapore, et cetera... And my uncle at Shell.... And my other uncle... And and and. 

Listen. There's stuff I could tell you about people that would make your head spin and catch on fire.

And what is the good of it all? Well - I could possibly give you a 'heads up' as and when and we are pretty close to the 'when.'

17x the speed of sound. No, honest!

I 'might' get some early warning.

And meanwhile, I have already 'did get' some (LOL, can't help the lack of grammar) uniquely trade-able commercial things. And so that's where we're heading, that's the actual plan. We're going to make some money.

The rest is I feel some sympathy for atheists - I am not one - because some here will have been through the Vietnam thing and some the Korean thing, and I doubt the youngsters who were in Iraq or Afghanistan can leave their NetFlix and come here... So I can't say no one has seen what is about to happen and that's why they 'don't have religion.' I don't think we've ever seen the mess that the world is in right now though.

But what will really change? Nothing. People will die, and you're going to have to pick your way through the dead bodies.

Maybe I have provoked some of the atheists here to answer the fundamental question: 'what does it all mean??'

Everybody has plenty to say before the blood starts really flowing though. Then you find out what people really 'believe.' The rest doesn't count.

Are we there yet? Not yet.

I'm not waiting. I'm doing 'Kung Fu defense' steps already. How about you?

Philosophical Comfort...

It's a difficult decision for me - well, I have to give it some thought anyway - as to whether to go the route of just demonstrating how we suddenly made some pretty sizable money here, or whether to deal with that second to establishing a basis for being able to intellectually rest within a solid framework of understanding our world, and our life.

Which one do you think is the more difficult...?

That was a Jesus question too, or so I recall from some old texts. You know, as in, He asked the people around him whether they thought it was easier to 'forgive their sins' or to do material miracles.

Mystical fire... LOL

I know there are some, what I would term 'kids' by which I mean people, who read here - actually they would have to be rather smart people - who are much younger than most of us who venture here!

Now they're going to potentially fall into the trap of becoming too wrapped-up in the 'cares of the world,' as they say, where in fact, they would be far better off in some effectively, Benedictine-style Monastery!! LOL Well, okay, maybe not so extreme of a life of seclusion from 'the world.'

Just earlier today, I had a discussion with one of our closest colleagues here, who happens to be a Muslim, perhaps more of a 'Westminster' version - as in, like a 'Baronness Warsi' of the UK House of Lords-style of Muslim. And this conversation was to do with the Iraqi scholar Sheikh Ahmed Al-Gubbanchi. Al-Gubbanchi is one of the top three Arabic language and Islamic scholars in the world today, the other two being Mufti Abu Layth and Christian Prince, the latter one being a Christian not a Muslim albeit he is formally trained in Islamic Jurisprudence.

That's one of the Maktoum's shaking the Sheikh's hand.
Ahmed Al-Gubbanchi is on the right.

Al-Gubbanchi is widely misquoted in the West and also misquoted and completely misunderstood in the Middle East as well. Most Muslims want to cut his head off.

However, what he has proposed is that the Quran is a text inspired by some 'spiritual wind,' yet otherwise it is the expression of men and not exactly the actual written speech of Allah.

And the meaning of this is that the words in it, are an expression in the context of the times, of various ideas, which require re-interpreting into our modern language and context. This is more or less exactly the same proposition that Christian apologists have regarding the Old Testament - namely, that it is a human-made narrative account of people's interactions with spiritual morality and also of what they perceived as encounters with 'God.'

I am mentioning this in reference to a rather peculiar notion I am, let's say, slowly edging forward here, namely that again, let's say, you suddenly see a whole lot of money being 'miraculously,' as it were, made here, and maybe you even get a piece of the action rather easily - then what happens next, though? Do you sit back, waiting for super-advanced Alien intelligent beings to knock on your door, and take you away in their space craft to some phase of extended physical longevity but which is still more or less 'burdened' with the problematic nature of human proclivities and regular tendency to do 'wickedness?'

There's no point making money unless you can relax with it.

What would be the point of that?

Right now in the American Christian mindset, there is a clear dichotomy between the so-called 'Progressives' and 'New Age' Christians, and the regular Scriptural Christians, who consider things like 'Yoga' and 'Reiki' and other Eastern or Oriental teachings clear-cut 'works of Satan' and demonic and 'non-Christian.' Of course we just don't need to even go into where atheists or agnostics stand in the considerations. 

Older readers here can look after themselves at least to the extent that they will have already found some way to come to their own judgments about things, especially any new things that they see. Everything does have to 'sit well' in the experienced reality... The closer you get to death the more you come to some form of terms with what that means - and categorically, what it does mean, is that it is natural.

So really, you (the mature people) want to make the money, and if it looks as though - oh dear, this was made by some 'very very strange process;' it doesn't necessarily matter that you spin your remaining years out just living a natural life then, thereafter. That was going to happen anyway. You don't need to go for a ride in a space craft that travels even faster than '17x the speed of sound' (Donald Trump's recent admission about the latest US missile technology). Not if you have the latest M3 BMW in the garage.

But for the younger people, their feet are going to get itchy. Especially if they 'see' something, get a real inkling that something funny has been going on. And so what I am suggesting is, that you need to get your mind into a real, a realistic, place of being comfortable and completely satisfied in its framework of understanding how the Universe works, aka 'what it is all about.'

Stupid stupid joke - 'blague' is the French-Swiss word for it.

And that is completely possible. You're not going to find it at any University anywhere on the planet. Give that idea up.

And I'm not going to give any ideas away too openly here.

But it is possible. You can get there. And you should try to.

Because you see, you cannot get 'up there' unless they know, you are not going to stab them in the back. Promises promises, right? Humans. SMH. You keep on telling yourself that you are trustworthy. Are you so sure? Really?

The 'Yoga Christians' are just falling prey to commercial enterprises, oh maybe there are a few 'demonic forces' around too - I mean, if there ever was a 'Reptilian' it would have to be that Kenneth Copeland(!) So sue me.

The Scriptural Christians are nearly there but even they will not face those 'never spoken about' passages that none of them even know, apparently, although they'll quote you every other thing in there and preach at you about all of those all day long.

I would definitely entertain anyone who wants to challenge some of the things I have been saying - there must be someone who has fixed, firm views, you know, strong-minded, beliefs that run way counter to what I am saying. I'd love to take on the smart, learned American Christians like Dr Michael Heiser - he has some decent ideas... Or Melissa Dougherty. The trouble is they have material lives - I don't. So I really don't feel like messing with them too much. I can afford to risk my life, and they can't. So they're mostly stuck in the blinds even though they see the cracks of light. Like the men of Hindustan, they're partly right...

The video below was one of the brand new things she played
in the live-stream, out in the open, in the cold, at Gstaad, Switzerland
just the other day.

So... When, not if, WHEN, you start to see the money turn up in force here - I am not going to signal punches to any potential competitors at all (and that's just plain standard operating procedure, 'across the Universe' as far as I can ascertain) - if you're a kid and you start having 'moral philosophy doubts/questions/cravings for information' then by all means contact me privately. Not yet though; wait till you see the green of the green-backs!

Right now, as in, RIGHT NOW, we have been able to acquire something not too dissimilar from 'ten tiles of gold-pressed Latinum.' LOL I don't even know what the whole stock is worth, I haven't calculated. But it's extremely valuable, in very rare supply, has a stunning high demand among pretty much only very rich people, and yeah, I have it all; as in ALL. I have the monopoly.

Protecting a monopoly is a task. You can never show what you're doing, or how you make the money, because in this day and age, as soon as you do that, all the sharks rush in.

We're so far in front now though, it hurts.

Any Bartok classical music fans here: