Oh-kay... Here We Go.

So. Human awake-state, alert, consciousness is a function of eumelanin carrying charged ions around in neural networks. Just because someone is anesthetized it doesn't mean their breathing stops - the same way that their surface consciousness has stopped. Which implies, scientifically, that the breathing nerve systems run on a different format even though they also use charged ions to transfer information and act on afferent bio-electrical impulses. I'm just repeating scientific views that are held by reputable people in the neuroscience field.

Ancient Sanskrit Vedas (Tulsi Gabbard may be familiar with the subject here - lol) make a link between 'breathing' or at least yogic breathing, and some kind of 'supernatural' but otherwise intelligible reality. And this is consistent with current ideas from modern science up until the point of 'supernatural intelligible reality.' There is certainly a categorical difference between the charged ion flows of surface consciousness, and the ions flowing in the nervous system accounting for 'breathing.' 

I'm not aware that there is any standard acknowledged 'particular' sections of the human brain that accommodate 'memories' of any 'supernatural' experiences had when in any state such as that following say heroin ingestion or drugging and so on - or, by the same token, any state developed by some kind of transcendental yogic practice, either.

People have though, and they report, emotional feelings, or 'hallucinations' or 'visions' during those altered consciousness states.

'Breathing' neurology is a bridge between the surface conscious format of the brain's memory circuits, and the 'unconscious' or 'preternatural' consciousness intelligible 'memory circuits' elsewhere. That is a proposition I make here (it isn't really mine, but I am unable to say whose it is right now; except I think it is a correct proposition).

Which means - if we take it a step further - that an individual needs to 'connect' their ordinary normal physical brain memory systems to the 'other' external or maybe sub-particle system one, in order to have any substantial recollection of any data or information or experience they had when in some kind of unconscious state. Otherwise, you'll just have been asleep for a while and wake up later with no 'memory' of anything.

It is a scientifically researched fact, that the flight/fright physiological response can easily be induced via sound, and via electromagnetic radiation - the US military currently uses such concepts in the field. UK military research via the Tavistock Institute and certain WWII UK Army Intelligence 'Departments' are notoriously recorded as being the original source of this area of psychological subversion and whatever else you choose to call it.

So it's just plain not scientific truth or fact that there is no such thing as an external intelligible potential source of 'information' - be it false information, or true (information).

There is such a thing; we use it now to inspire fear in opponents on a battlefield.

The question here is, is there such a thing - as a complex higher-order intelligible information 'thing' somewhere out there outside of our physical human brains?

The one thing you will tend to note with a lot of 'transcendent' type 'music' or tone poems, is that people who listen to them widely say they get a feeling of 'sadness,' or maybe 'bitter happiness.' Well, this is because, as people 'go unconscious' from the normal material charged ion pathways, they experience the expected sense of loss.

And - because nobody makes the 'connection' (as I have posited, above, that they must do, or they should do) to the outside para-neural intelligible structures, the loss, is replaced by nothing they remembered or gained in the experience; it's like they were on the edge of something they 'knew' was real, ahead of them somewhere, but they did not see into the 'there.' And so all they have is the feeling of sadness. Mostly. Some people maybe accidentally move further.

Just another small point - the sum of inside angles of polyhedral shapes, does not exactly equate to musical notes ipso facto, because for one thing, any range of notes arranged by discrete frequency numbers, is dependent on the reference note - which we humans always call 'C.' Whatever we started off saying was going to be 'C' then determines what frequencies all the other notes then are. But you can, more or less decode as a language, any piece of - let's call it 'music' - as shapes and as possibly, alphabets too. I know various 'groups' have done this but I personally don't go into all these dry details and I just like music for the sake well, of just music!  

Tavistock typically spent a lot of time 'connecting' subjects with fearful feelings and ideas, and some other pretty negative states. They wasted a lot of time, in my view. So, you can hurt people with noise. So? You can damage their mental condition with sounds. Yeah, great. You can keep unwanted characters away from shop-windows with looped classical music. Great.

You can 'listen to the emotions of whales' if you are from California and you do a lot of drugs. All right.

How many people even remember Dr John C. Lilly? LOL

Trust me though, rust never sleeps.

We are up the road from all of that.

Now the following is just STEP TWO, of THREE steps - it's a rough 'brush-up.'

The five notes are: G, A, F, F lower Octave, and C.

Now This is Going To Be Scary

And I'm not sure how much I will keep posted up here over the next two or three articles...

I'm going to ask for some help or at least your suggestions as to which bits to post first. Would you like the 'whiz-bang' stuff right up front first?

Or would you like some mathematical and logical preparation first?

You remember I mentioned that the sum of the inside angles of all regular polygons was a number that equated either directly to a musical note, or its harmonic derivative...?

The inside angles of a square add up to 360 -
which is roughly the note 'F.'

Now I just want to add to that some very advanced, 'latest' (but mostly not-yet-disclosed) research and the related discoveries, to do with the way electrons are stripped from brain lipids - principally eumelanin - by... um... by magnetic fields and also by all chemical anesthetic agents. You see, the conscious brain's neural networks are bio-electric processes, and they contain charged ions in the lipids of brain cells, well, in fact of all cells. ...And here is something you will never see in any research paper as yet published - but, the fact is (and it is a fact), that intellectual surface layer 'neural network firings' all ARE BOUNDED (Kim Philby, are you reading?) by discrete energy flows, otherwise known as frequencies, but more so also known as musical tones or main musical tone derivatives (harmonics, micro-frequency 'notes,' ultra-low/ultra-high, infra-sound and so on).

And that's just a bunch of colorful shapes...

Which is why, when you lose consciousness from an anesthetic, and your cell chemistry stops in the neural paths, all the other cell functions don't just stop as well and make you die. Sure you can die, but probably from things slowing sufficiently to create secondary side-effects, not from any actual bio-chemical process actually suddenly stopping, the way the anesthetic stopped your consciousness temporarily. (Remember, don't confuse 'analgesic' or calcium channel blocking, or hyper-inflammation, with 'anesthetic')

So.

Right now you are armed with three items: 1. that the brain can be effected discretely (meaning in a calculated and measured way; such as, like in a process of 'language') by the proximity of an electromagnetic field, 2. some chemicals 'steal' charged ions inside the firing neural networks causing them to slow and to stop (aka 'unconsciousness'), and 3. consciousness synaptic activity is bounded by particular frequency limits.

Be prepared for what you are about to see and read, next.  

Communication Out Of Control

If you read here for a mild and diverting form of entertainment, that's good. Because life should be fun, shouldn't it?

At the same time every now and then, possibly as a fore-runner to some outrageous thing or other that appears to me at least, likely to emerge on us all from the orange-y haze of the distant horizon - I will post some 'structural exercises' for the way minds can operate, although they seldom do.

You know everyone you run into is going to say they are all-too familiar with politics and political communication and even just plain basic human communication. And you can't blame them; if you go by sheer quantity of information that would be classed as political debate, or political expression, or just discussion between people on disputed ideas -, then modern people are nothing if not highly experienced.

Okay but so that is, as usual, not exactly the way I would view things...

I want you to consider any polyhedral object with faces, edges, and vertices:

And then, I want you to take any current subject matter featured in the news - brexit, or the Kurds in the Northeastern corridor of Syria, whatever.

Now I want you to imagine two people, represented by two separate polyhedral objects, and that the target of a period of communication, is the adjoining of two faces of the separated polyhedrals such that they are 'sharing the same surface' or 'surfaces' (IE being formed by the same points in Euclidean space; in this case of the surfaces, they would be simple two-dimensional 'areas.'

So... They - the two people - begin as relatively 'far apart,' and each is represented by a polyhedral. Now in normal terms of energy flows, like charges repel. But in this type of process, like surfaces attract because they aim to actually share geometric space as points-of-flat-area-in-common. 

People assign measured value to their ideas and beliefs

And this would all be perfectly functional, and always be capable of being resolved as a structural, or geometric problem of dynamics and organisation - except that two other things must be applied to what people do in communication: they place a term, or a word label, requiring a definition, onto each surface they are intellectually conscious of as something they are seeking to have communicated - and agreed upon by others.

Additionally, they assign inside themselves, inside their emotional networks - inside their memories, neural nets, nervous 'vertical energy' systems and so on - 'strengths' of belief or feeling, and strengths of volition, and orders of priority.

Now here's the problem - you cannot easily get by common human convention any guarantee from any other human these days (or maybe at any time in history with few exceptions) that the 'term' they applied is actually the same as the term you have applied to your surface desired to be communicated, and nor can you get any up-front insight into what definition or definitions they applied, or an agreement that the both of you will use the same terms and definitions or that these need to be standard definitions and usages of words. 

It can even be the case that one person is advancing a face or 'facet' of an argument, and deliberately blurring the facet - as the Japanese say, employing 'haragei;' a dance of diaphanous silkiness in front of your eyes.

Every behavioral psychologist will tell you - 'oh but this is something the human race has devised as an evolutionary common practice that serves the social group as a whole.' 

No it hasn't.

Spa salts...!

This is a process entirely outside of what humans are purpose-built to do and to achieve as an intelligent communicating species.

And you know of no example of what human beings would be like, or what society would be like, if it did the opposite thing to what it currently does in this graphical metaphor of ours depicting 'communication.'

So now you... When you go out into the streets, or to your work, or simply talk with those around you, your family friends and the people who are physically around your space - how are you going to interact with them now? 

Are you going to be all technical in your head and start to closely examine everything?

Well, hell you should.

And don't be afraid of that. Oh yes a lot of people will stop liking you and many will stop talking to you at all.

And now I'm going to lay on you a very big secret. Your eyes are deceiving you most of the time and they can see, as in literally see optically, much more than you have seen up until now. But by social habit, the human race has been 'trained' out of 'registering' those optical inputs in the conscious brain (they may be there subconsciously).

It is the case, and we must acknowledge and accept it, that we need to, we are required for various reasons of necessity, to engage with people we might not really want to, once we can 'read' them with our re-established optical capabilities. And yes, you can buy these 'augmented reality' glasses which help by using computational algorithms that detect biometrics; and that will also have the same or similar outcomes.

Marshall McLuhan

I assure you, everybody you know, almost everybody you know, is marching 'up' a conceptual hill in their subconscious minds, and for absolutely no end purpose whatsoever, with zero true objective in intellectual space, as it were. They have no knowledge of why they have composed the polyhedrals in their minds and in their 'word forms' of communicated language. They have no understanding of the energy systems and structures of intellectual space, be it human or any other one. 

And the value benefit to you, of being able to 'see' this, is that when you see a different individual - you are then 'seeing' someone whose intellectual objectives are clear, whose conceptual planning actually exists, and who definitely achieves and attains, what they set out to achieve and attain, although what they have targeted are regularly quite strange things and very different to what the bulk of humans seek. Now there are also many very wealthy people too, whose money and material substance remains with them for a long time, often for the whole entirety of their lives. And yet too most of these people are 'accidents;' they are accidentally wealthy and only ever materially wealthy, because the world is very vast and filled with physical value and material substance and through many varied causes these individuals have money come to them. And that's okay. It's pretty sad but it is what it is.

The Sky Is Open...

Aerial Silk Hammock Yoga

So, they invent something new - or kinda new - every year out in L.A.

Don't they?

Here we have some pics of the latest thing: silk hammock yoga.

Everything looks pleasantly 'mauve-ish' once the blood flows
down into your eye-sockets

And I must say, as long as I don't have to do much except lie there and shut my eyes and 'concentrate on my in breath, and on my out breath' - then yes, sign me up.

I have often swayed slowly in a hammock at night, looking up at the Orionid meteorites shooting across the sky, and listening to Tchaikovsky through my wireless headphones with the volume pretty turned up high.

Somehow I don't think this is exactly what they all have in mind out there in the rich women's fitness studios on the West Coast.

I could do that...

Wonder what Mark Zuckerberg does to 'stay fit...'

I am utterly not convinced about these recent press stories about how Facebook's digital currency proposals 'are not getting the backing' from some 'major financial institutions' like PayPal and Mastercard and Visa and similar.

Well. See. These are NOT major financial anything anymore - they are has-beens tacking onto the trailing air-streams flying off the latest cyber-space technology. What deal was put to them by Facebook? Was it something like: 'give up?'

Let's just see what happens, yeah?

I can tell you this though - the network of users that FB has compared to the whole entire lot of all the rest that 'pulled back' from supporting Zuckerberg's latest adventure -, and here's the real key; the velocity of discrete units of platform use, is the difference between a gigantic iceberg, and a twig.

Zuckerberg = iceberg. All the rest = Titanic. 

Sounds Silly, But...

(A quick aside: there has been a lot of progress regarding the Utility Token we have formulated. It is already silver-backed and will continue to be after a broader if still quiet launch to key 'closed groups').

Anyway... Back to the saga.

My problem with going too far too soon is that, well, what am I actually expecting people to do? Leave their jobs, their normal roles, and go up to some cave like an anchorite? And what - contemplate their unique new knowledge...?

WTF?

The whole reason for why any of us does this 'let's make a whole bunch of money' thing is that there is then and only then, some kind of justifiable reason for going to 'yoga nidra' practice with all those women and wives ex-Cali or literally just off the private jet from Cali.

If we all had the bank account balance that gave us nothing to do or to think about that was either new or all that demanding, then yeah sure, we might have to go indulge all those silly little oddities of modern/post-modern Hollywood-imaged Western urban culture - like drink stevia-sweetened decaf with useless friends and talk about 'Joker' and why white men are angry. 

Supposedly wealthy, or rich people - are bored people. And that's just the plain fact of it. They're not all that entertaining or interesting to talk to when you get down to it. 

We're not rich people or wealthy people over here.

We are para-wealthy. Wa-a-a-ay beyond the merely materially wealthy. Don't think I cannot do that trick with the water.

For one thing it isn't a trick.

You start with simple ideas, simple structural ideas..
I think this is by Walter Gropius, btw.

And don't think for one second I cannot convey the process of doing it to you. I'm sure I haven't heard that many sane rational people claim to be able to do the kind of thing so I am imputing that you cannot either, yet. So hey! Something ridiculous but new. Stop you from being bored for a while at least.

To paraphrase JFK, today, we stand on the threshold of... well... of something, anyway; lord knows what it is or is going to end up being.

What is all this talk about?

Technology, man. We are on the very threshold of the up-taking of new but quite available, technology. People have discovered things, you see. There have been new discoveries made. I can move blocks of stone with my mind now. Oh yes yes. My now long since retired one-time (ex-)boss used to claim to be able to do something along similar lines - and he was the absolute very last last ever person you would suppose to indulge that kind of nonsense talk. Because it's silly, see. It's really really silly stuff. Isn't it?

LOL

You start with simple ideas, and you spend some considerable time turning them over in your head, and from there things grow, you see.

'Intelligent fabric' fashion/design

So today right now, there are some Tel Aviv companies making all of this 'intelligent fabric' using nanotechnology and other advanced structural materials, and using microcircuits integrated with the fibers and optical tubules and all kinds of things we have mostly never even heard of yet. But there's software that goes along with the physical technical aspects - software that analyses what people are thinking, what their biometrics show second-by-second. You can see from the fabric glowing in the shadows of a darkened nightclub, what they are thinking down to very discrete logic literal words and idea forms, what the neural network harmonic resonances are in wave-forms and frequency strength - and you can transfer ideas to them and they back to you across quite large distances.