'Evidence-free media narratives..."
This is what we've been getting from virtually THE WHOLE ENTIRE BLEEDING LOT OF THEM.
...Plane falls out of sky, however there is no plane.
...Russia kills people with Novichok, a WMD that could kill a whole city block in the amounts claimed to have been used in Salisbury - however there are no bodies... And you can forget the miscellaneous old lady who died weeks later elsewhere.
...'Journalist' murdered in Embassy - however there is no journalist.
Any pattern there?
Nevertheless, sharper than tacks, we have an IMMEDIATE geopolitical position pumped out across the board of all of the whole panoply of the media everywhere - meaning, even whatever is left of the non-biased, objective media, has been totally sucked into the black-hole of disinformation.
The Saudis, expressly Crown Prince Salman himself (who happens to be close to the Trump Family) ordered the obvious murder of Jamal Khashoggi himself, and we must all pull out from any co-operation with him and with Saudi Arabia; he is not acceptable as the leader of Saudi Arabia, especially since he is a serial rapist who was at the party thirty-whatever years ago, with Brett Kavanaugh and he was absolutely blind drunk because Professor-Doctor-Lawyer-Accountant-Brain Surgeon and Astronaut 'Chrissy' Blasey Ford-Prefect says so and she must be believed!!
Zero, absolutely zero facts whatsoever.
Erdogan, who jailed thousands of people even vaguely suspected of being potentially opposed to his dictatorship (he is a dictator categorically ever since he combined the roles of chief elected minister and head of state of Turkey) produced one external video camera clip and allegations about recordings of a brutal murder carried out by Saudi operatives inside their own Saudi Embassy. Bad bad Saudis.
Meanwhile, the facts we do have are these: John Brennan lost his security clearance and so did Hillary Clinton and then suddenly lo and behold, Jamal Khashoggi is either dead or missing, or missing and dead.
If you refer back to my article here of the 18th of April 2018 concerning the history of the Saudi Secret Intelligence operation under the old Saudi regime, pre-Salman, you will see that it prominently noted what Adnan Khashoggi's role was with the Petrodollar elites. Jamal was the cousin of the late Adnan and from all of the published views of Jamal Khashoggi, he (Jamal) was a chief strategist for the modern-day Muslim Brotherhood. He's no journalist! He got given a whole entire newspaper to own and run in Saudi Arabia by the old Saudi Foreign Minister. Other than that he has no track record nor any qualifications as a 'journalist!'
Yet even so, does that mean the Saudis killed him in their own Embassy after having lured him there, and then - as Erdogan's mouthpieces have it - dismembered his body after torturing him first...?
If this is true in any measure whatsoever, and Erdogan wanted to press some leverage over the Saudis and gain favor with the Trump Administration, he would have immediately invited a specialist team of forensics experts from the FBI.
It did not happen. By which I mean the media's speculation that Khashoggi was lured into and then murdered by Saudis in the Saudi Embassy is based on a fiction.
Autism Project Donations:
Autism Project Donations here - https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=23MBUB4W8AL7E
Sunday, 14 October 2018
Saturday, 13 October 2018
The World's Richest Horse Race
The media is guilty of this nonsense of trying to qualify the statement like this: the world's richest horse race on turf.
Turf racing is horse racing, all the other things are rink-dink fake pretend horse races where the track-owners either are too cheap to spend the money to look after a proper turf circuit, or else the environment 'on course' is so artificial due to the local climate, that growing proper grass for racing on is impossible. To say nothing of the 'help' to soft-conditioned super wealthy people's toy race horses that float and bounce on rubberized surfaces...
The Everest held in Sydney, Australia, is the world richest horse race.
Redzel - whom we have spoken about here before, won it again, for the second year in a row.
And the trainer, Peter Snowden - one of the best trainers in the world today - was totally overcome during the interview immediately after the race. This was a 13 million dollar race and he's won it twice in successive years. He talked about god in the interview... And there were tears threatening to pour down his face.
LOL
As someone with a past in the world of professional gambling, I should point out that professional gambling is not about trying to win any particular single race, or attempting to put all your stock into 'the next race' - but rather, to organize your stake and calculate ways of profiting over several races on average and achieving the best odds (prices) not just any odds on what you think is most likely to win.
At the same time I have a genuine appreciation of what it takes to be an owner, or trainer, or dedicated follower of horses, and these sorts of highest level events are a source of admiration for me of the unique traits of race horses, and of the love and the dedication of owners and trainers. I find I generally cannot bet on these events. Some people assume that for trainers and owners it's just about the money - it's not about the money. What horse racing can teach you, if you are observant, is a certain baroque depth about life that almost nothing else can teach you consistently - maybe opera, some classical music, some old school heavy rock music, also can (teach)...
This weekend we saw some authentic star race horses. And for some reason the last seven or eight years have produced some of the best horses all in the same general era, that I have ever seen over fifty years.
Today, in terms of prospectives, rather than seasoned older horses who have very restricted opportunities, we also saw the second best horse in the world, in my view - second only to the great mare Winx. And that horse is 'The Autumn Sun.'
When you invest in something, 'gamble' on something, the correct way to 'strategize' about what you are doing is to find the spot where the best outcome is joy, the worst outcome is joy, and the optimum outcome is joy - and if any of them are hitting up against fear, you're doing it wrong.
Turf racing is horse racing, all the other things are rink-dink fake pretend horse races where the track-owners either are too cheap to spend the money to look after a proper turf circuit, or else the environment 'on course' is so artificial due to the local climate, that growing proper grass for racing on is impossible. To say nothing of the 'help' to soft-conditioned super wealthy people's toy race horses that float and bounce on rubberized surfaces...
Redzel |
The Everest held in Sydney, Australia, is the world richest horse race.
Redzel - whom we have spoken about here before, won it again, for the second year in a row.
And the trainer, Peter Snowden - one of the best trainers in the world today - was totally overcome during the interview immediately after the race. This was a 13 million dollar race and he's won it twice in successive years. He talked about god in the interview... And there were tears threatening to pour down his face.
LOL
Peter Snowden was completely overcome at one point |
As someone with a past in the world of professional gambling, I should point out that professional gambling is not about trying to win any particular single race, or attempting to put all your stock into 'the next race' - but rather, to organize your stake and calculate ways of profiting over several races on average and achieving the best odds (prices) not just any odds on what you think is most likely to win.
At the same time I have a genuine appreciation of what it takes to be an owner, or trainer, or dedicated follower of horses, and these sorts of highest level events are a source of admiration for me of the unique traits of race horses, and of the love and the dedication of owners and trainers. I find I generally cannot bet on these events. Some people assume that for trainers and owners it's just about the money - it's not about the money. What horse racing can teach you, if you are observant, is a certain baroque depth about life that almost nothing else can teach you consistently - maybe opera, some classical music, some old school heavy rock music, also can (teach)...
This weekend we saw some authentic star race horses. And for some reason the last seven or eight years have produced some of the best horses all in the same general era, that I have ever seen over fifty years.
Today, in terms of prospectives, rather than seasoned older horses who have very restricted opportunities, we also saw the second best horse in the world, in my view - second only to the great mare Winx. And that horse is 'The Autumn Sun.'
When you invest in something, 'gamble' on something, the correct way to 'strategize' about what you are doing is to find the spot where the best outcome is joy, the worst outcome is joy, and the optimum outcome is joy - and if any of them are hitting up against fear, you're doing it wrong.
The Autumn Sun |
Monday, 8 October 2018
The Mohallil Everest Horse Race
Coming up on the 13th of October is The Everest horse race at Randwick Race Track in Sydney - which will be the richest horse race on turf in the world, offering 13 million dollars to the to be shared between the winners and place-getters - and to so some extent all the 12 starters wherever they come because the basis of the race itself is quite unusual:
People, wealthy, in fact very wealthy, people, invest in a 'slot' (one of twelve such slots), and then having secured their slot, they 'invite' a horse they think can win into taking up the slot and racing for the actual 13 million dollars in prize-money. At the moment, the going rate for buying a slot is $600,000. The slot-owners negotiate with the owners and trainers of their invited horse (or horses) for the percentage split-up of the eventual prize-money.
As far as I can read it, this would all be in compliance with the concept of 'Sadaqa' racing in Islam, with the transacting over the prize-money and starting slots known as 'mohallil' business.
This is all of some interest to me because I am currently working on an aspect of this with some 'rich kids of Dubai...!'
Anyway, The Everest horse race is a fantastic idea and this year - as in the small number of previous years in which it was run - the twelve 'slotted horses' are extraordinary animals. The race is a sprint race over 1200 meters and it is without question the most interesting serious racing horse race in the world for professionals in horse racing and wagering - or, to put it in the appropriate form for this Muslims around the place, 'transacting over the starting place and the prize-money.'
Given the nature of the process of 'inviting' horses to a starting slot, I would presume that either part of, of an additional sum would most certainly be given to the owners and trainers just for plain accepting the slot.
For me this is going to be a sensational, truly exciting event - something I really enjoy at this rather late stage in my horse racing 'career.' Smaller contests generally cannot get me to stake meaningful sums any more, and most of the well-known traditional 'big' races for me at least, are 'spun' as entertainment by Turf Clubs and are no long true contests of horse, rider, and trainer and owner. This thing - The Everest - is.
They can whinge all they like about the people in Sydney Horse Racing using the Sydney Opera House as a gambling advertising billboard! Too bad.
People, wealthy, in fact very wealthy, people, invest in a 'slot' (one of twelve such slots), and then having secured their slot, they 'invite' a horse they think can win into taking up the slot and racing for the actual 13 million dollars in prize-money. At the moment, the going rate for buying a slot is $600,000. The slot-owners negotiate with the owners and trainers of their invited horse (or horses) for the percentage split-up of the eventual prize-money.
13 million dollars The Everest horse race, diamond-encrusted trophy This is real horse racing! |
As far as I can read it, this would all be in compliance with the concept of 'Sadaqa' racing in Islam, with the transacting over the prize-money and starting slots known as 'mohallil' business.
This is all of some interest to me because I am currently working on an aspect of this with some 'rich kids of Dubai...!'
Anyway, The Everest horse race is a fantastic idea and this year - as in the small number of previous years in which it was run - the twelve 'slotted horses' are extraordinary animals. The race is a sprint race over 1200 meters and it is without question the most interesting serious racing horse race in the world for professionals in horse racing and wagering - or, to put it in the appropriate form for this Muslims around the place, 'transacting over the starting place and the prize-money.'
Given the nature of the process of 'inviting' horses to a starting slot, I would presume that either part of, of an additional sum would most certainly be given to the owners and trainers just for plain accepting the slot.
For me this is going to be a sensational, truly exciting event - something I really enjoy at this rather late stage in my horse racing 'career.' Smaller contests generally cannot get me to stake meaningful sums any more, and most of the well-known traditional 'big' races for me at least, are 'spun' as entertainment by Turf Clubs and are no long true contests of horse, rider, and trainer and owner. This thing - The Everest - is.
They can whinge all they like about the people in Sydney Horse Racing using the Sydney Opera House as a gambling advertising billboard! Too bad.
Sunday, 7 October 2018
MI5 'Official' Permission To Do Crime...
The 'Third Direction' - official permission for MI5 people to commit crimes!!
The thing that occurs to me most of all at the present time, is that it seems that a lot of people, all across the whole globe are over-playing their hands right now.
What is going on? Do they all feel some zeitgeist they don't like, coming upon them?
Xi Jinping is a prime example - what on earth is he doing? He'd already secured absolute power 'legally' but now instead of living in the strength of that, he's jumping at shadows everywhere. It's almost like he feels less secure than ever.
Communist China has a track record of instability among the 'power elite' at the top, with murders and assassinations having happened many times but always presented to the public as 'air accidents' (Lin Biao being the biggest political figure) or 'retirements into oblivion.'
Xi Jinping is already the walking dead - for two reasons, firstly, if he succeeds in foiling all the coming attempts against him, he will utterly lose control of the country as the economic giant it was becoming; he does not now, and cannot by harsh dictatorship, actually control the manufacturing industries of Shanghai, Hong Kong, Guangzhou, or the inland regions - in other words, he controls nothing if not by 'general assent' of the people and the administrators. So he controls nothing. Period. Beijing's appearance of control over Hong Kong is superficial now. And they have zero chance of overpowering Taiwan at all now. The days of rampant stealing of high technology are over. So what does China have? Nothing. It's finished.
And this makes him, Xi, incredibly vulnerable to the Trump foreign policy style and strategies.
But all of this is because he continues to overplay what might have been a very strong hand, had he just built up his position through benevolence - he's done exactly the opposite and now he's got no aces left. No one trusts him and no one can now or ever will. The only question is how gruesome will his end be. Yes yes, I know he thinks he's 'the Supreme Power Under All Of Heaven' and that he is doing the 'good + bad' 'yin/yang' thing but he's not doing it right; he's coming across like a power-hungry, power-mad, idiot.
In the same way, this recent Christine Blasey Ford thing just exposed the hand of the 'Deep State' - and if anything, it ended up proving there really IS such a thing as the 'Deep State' and that it's not a conspiracy theory at all.
Same again, with the latest revelations in the UK about MI5 (and we only know officially about MI5 and not MI6 because the Information Writs were only applied for for MI5) - namely, that there was an official scheme known as 'the Third Direction' which allowed MI5 assets and operatives and paid informants to participate in criminal activities.
I mean really, there is no such thing as 'permission to commit crimes!!' It's not legal in any sense of principles of Law, it's not even legal in any black letter laws. It's just underhanded nonsense schemed and carried out by criminals masquerading as politicians and top-line administrators.
This fellow - 'Lord Justice Sir (can you see all the BS?) Adrian Fulford' - was set up to do 'oversight' on this arrangement to ensure that, to ensure that, to ensure what, exactly -, that no laws were broken too much while they were doing crimes??? God, what a laugh.
What a lot of bloody nonsense and claptrap. It's purest insanity.
Did MI6 also do this - overseas? In other countries, foreign countries, stealing things and money from innocent, naiive business-people?
What d'we think, Bill? A possibility?
Hey guys - you have my address. Put the money back. Bring it in cash, in big leather bags or paper bags, we won't mind, will we Bill.
I kid you not here - a couple of Australian Federal Police Officers came to my door one day, and they asked me this question (as they did, I think, my mate around the same time whose name shall not be revealed and who was and still is a business partner): 'what questions or items would you like addressed, IF THERE WAS A JUDGE PERFORMING OVERSIGHT ON WHAT HAPPENED (TO YOU)?'
I remember I just laughed because it meant I/we had caught them red-handed.
And do I expect any re-imbursement, ever? Nope. I just hope to keep on grinning as another and another fool falls. And the show ain't over yet, not by a long shot.
Meanwhile, take note of the negative words from people on the Right like Jack Posobiec and a lot of others, about Jordan Peterson. Peterson is another of these 'over-played,' 'wrong timing' hands, exposed now, played too soon for zero effect. A wasted investment. And a big investment. Wasted. Amazing.
...It's like, well, all the pawns are keeling over and some knights and bishops too.
What the hell is going on? I'm sure I don't know.
I just want you to know though, this has been a very sophisticated, big league game with lots of strands and layers and vast networks - all coming asunder now.
It's simply amazing.
The thing that occurs to me most of all at the present time, is that it seems that a lot of people, all across the whole globe are over-playing their hands right now.
What is going on? Do they all feel some zeitgeist they don't like, coming upon them?
Xi Jinping is a prime example - what on earth is he doing? He'd already secured absolute power 'legally' but now instead of living in the strength of that, he's jumping at shadows everywhere. It's almost like he feels less secure than ever.
Old School |
Communist China has a track record of instability among the 'power elite' at the top, with murders and assassinations having happened many times but always presented to the public as 'air accidents' (Lin Biao being the biggest political figure) or 'retirements into oblivion.'
Xi Jinping is already the walking dead - for two reasons, firstly, if he succeeds in foiling all the coming attempts against him, he will utterly lose control of the country as the economic giant it was becoming; he does not now, and cannot by harsh dictatorship, actually control the manufacturing industries of Shanghai, Hong Kong, Guangzhou, or the inland regions - in other words, he controls nothing if not by 'general assent' of the people and the administrators. So he controls nothing. Period. Beijing's appearance of control over Hong Kong is superficial now. And they have zero chance of overpowering Taiwan at all now. The days of rampant stealing of high technology are over. So what does China have? Nothing. It's finished.
And this makes him, Xi, incredibly vulnerable to the Trump foreign policy style and strategies.
But all of this is because he continues to overplay what might have been a very strong hand, had he just built up his position through benevolence - he's done exactly the opposite and now he's got no aces left. No one trusts him and no one can now or ever will. The only question is how gruesome will his end be. Yes yes, I know he thinks he's 'the Supreme Power Under All Of Heaven' and that he is doing the 'good + bad' 'yin/yang' thing but he's not doing it right; he's coming across like a power-hungry, power-mad, idiot.
In the same way, this recent Christine Blasey Ford thing just exposed the hand of the 'Deep State' - and if anything, it ended up proving there really IS such a thing as the 'Deep State' and that it's not a conspiracy theory at all.
At least this guy actually tells you he's an actor! |
Same again, with the latest revelations in the UK about MI5 (and we only know officially about MI5 and not MI6 because the Information Writs were only applied for for MI5) - namely, that there was an official scheme known as 'the Third Direction' which allowed MI5 assets and operatives and paid informants to participate in criminal activities.
I mean really, there is no such thing as 'permission to commit crimes!!' It's not legal in any sense of principles of Law, it's not even legal in any black letter laws. It's just underhanded nonsense schemed and carried out by criminals masquerading as politicians and top-line administrators.
This fellow - 'Lord Justice Sir (can you see all the BS?) Adrian Fulford' - was set up to do 'oversight' on this arrangement to ensure that, to ensure that, to ensure what, exactly -, that no laws were broken too much while they were doing crimes??? God, what a laugh.
What a lot of bloody nonsense and claptrap. It's purest insanity.
Did MI6 also do this - overseas? In other countries, foreign countries, stealing things and money from innocent, naiive business-people?
What d'we think, Bill? A possibility?
Hey guys - you have my address. Put the money back. Bring it in cash, in big leather bags or paper bags, we won't mind, will we Bill.
I kid you not here - a couple of Australian Federal Police Officers came to my door one day, and they asked me this question (as they did, I think, my mate around the same time whose name shall not be revealed and who was and still is a business partner): 'what questions or items would you like addressed, IF THERE WAS A JUDGE PERFORMING OVERSIGHT ON WHAT HAPPENED (TO YOU)?'
I remember I just laughed because it meant I/we had caught them red-handed.
And do I expect any re-imbursement, ever? Nope. I just hope to keep on grinning as another and another fool falls. And the show ain't over yet, not by a long shot.
Meanwhile, take note of the negative words from people on the Right like Jack Posobiec and a lot of others, about Jordan Peterson. Peterson is another of these 'over-played,' 'wrong timing' hands, exposed now, played too soon for zero effect. A wasted investment. And a big investment. Wasted. Amazing.
...It's like, well, all the pawns are keeling over and some knights and bishops too.
What the hell is going on? I'm sure I don't know.
I just want you to know though, this has been a very sophisticated, big league game with lots of strands and layers and vast networks - all coming asunder now.
It's simply amazing.
Friday, 5 October 2018
Sophisticated And Sinister
Kudos to 'Zerohedge,' the on-line news and politics journal which has basically uncovered close involvement of DNC staffers with the attorneys for various 'witnesses' (they actually witnessed nothing) to do with the accusations against Judge Kavanaugh. This 'close involvement' really constitutes influencing and manipulating of witnesses.
In any case, probably even more significantly, Zerohedge has brought to light the 'political communications' firm (TSD Communications) behind the strategy to wreck the confirmation of Judge Kavanaugh. Key to what the Left's problem with Kavanaugh is, appears to be the largely political question of whether or not Presidential 'over-reach' and 'executive power' needs to be curtailed or reigned-in. And they have targeted Senator Jeff Flake and Senator Susan Collins as individuals who may regard President Trump as 'needing to be reigned-in.' But very specifically, the senior brains in the key strategy group openly has also told its followers, that whether not Judge Kavanaugh is confirmed, they can damage him politically for a long time to come, if not permanently poison his confirmation. I rarely link, but here is the excellent ZH article: https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-10-05/blasey-fords-fbi-polygraph-buddy-pressured-woman-mystery-groping-party-change-story
And that's the way these people think. But even Zerohedge will never be able to tell you exactly how these strategies are actually implemented or what goes into preparing of the 'accusers' and 'witnesses' and the 'image-making' behind the theoretical strategy elements.
It is much more sophisticated and cunning and manipulative and organized than you can imagine at first glance - and it involves large networked groups and highly-placed people.
You could sit back and listen to the voice of Ricki Seidman from TSD and think: 'Hmn, that voice does have that odd upward inflection of word-sounding that Chrissy Blasey Ford has in her accent and vocal delivery,' but would you jump to the conclusion that these two people are either really close colleagues in the same political agency or one has literally 'directed' the other as in say, a director would their main star actor. You should. And it's much worse than that - as I have suggested previously. This is done at the level of the Office of Entertainment Liaison at the CIA, using panels of public image consultants including George Lucas.
Who you are looking at, when you see this 'identity' 'Chrissy Blasey Ford' render testimony to torpedo a judge in the Senate chamber, is someone - an actor - who is a proxy for Seidman and for TSD Communications.
I don't need to go 'too far' here and actually voice what would be viewed as quite bizarre conspiracy theories, except to say that you will never find anyone attesting to having known this 'Chrissy Blasey' at that school at that time in question, other than individuals who are inside the same circle of DNC staffers, and TSD Communications.
In any case, probably even more significantly, Zerohedge has brought to light the 'political communications' firm (TSD Communications) behind the strategy to wreck the confirmation of Judge Kavanaugh. Key to what the Left's problem with Kavanaugh is, appears to be the largely political question of whether or not Presidential 'over-reach' and 'executive power' needs to be curtailed or reigned-in. And they have targeted Senator Jeff Flake and Senator Susan Collins as individuals who may regard President Trump as 'needing to be reigned-in.' But very specifically, the senior brains in the key strategy group openly has also told its followers, that whether not Judge Kavanaugh is confirmed, they can damage him politically for a long time to come, if not permanently poison his confirmation. I rarely link, but here is the excellent ZH article: https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-10-05/blasey-fords-fbi-polygraph-buddy-pressured-woman-mystery-groping-party-change-story
Ricki Seidman |
And that's the way these people think. But even Zerohedge will never be able to tell you exactly how these strategies are actually implemented or what goes into preparing of the 'accusers' and 'witnesses' and the 'image-making' behind the theoretical strategy elements.
It is much more sophisticated and cunning and manipulative and organized than you can imagine at first glance - and it involves large networked groups and highly-placed people.
You could sit back and listen to the voice of Ricki Seidman from TSD and think: 'Hmn, that voice does have that odd upward inflection of word-sounding that Chrissy Blasey Ford has in her accent and vocal delivery,' but would you jump to the conclusion that these two people are either really close colleagues in the same political agency or one has literally 'directed' the other as in say, a director would their main star actor. You should. And it's much worse than that - as I have suggested previously. This is done at the level of the Office of Entertainment Liaison at the CIA, using panels of public image consultants including George Lucas.
Who you are looking at, when you see this 'identity' 'Chrissy Blasey Ford' render testimony to torpedo a judge in the Senate chamber, is someone - an actor - who is a proxy for Seidman and for TSD Communications.
Christmas ('Chrissy') Noel Snow, in 'American Graffiti' (1973) |
I don't need to go 'too far' here and actually voice what would be viewed as quite bizarre conspiracy theories, except to say that you will never find anyone attesting to having known this 'Chrissy Blasey' at that school at that time in question, other than individuals who are inside the same circle of DNC staffers, and TSD Communications.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)