The Market Truth

There's a famous guy - you might have heard of him - his name is Leo Burnett.

Should I stop there?

Okay so Leo Burnett is not with us anymore but he has left a legacy.

Leo had a file in his office labelled 'Corny Language.' He collected words and phrases that he heard people use which he felt had the certain 'corny' touch that people, so he believed - and he was right - were attracted to on a 'common, everyday human level.'

Screenshot capture from "Ingress"

Leo was responsible for most of the cartoon-style adverts for breakfast cereal and whole vast array of consumer products of the last well, more than fifty years.

Now let us look at what has been making the main news over the last few days - apparently an iPhone game phenomenon called 'Pokemon Go.'

Pokemon is a stupid name from a stupid Japanese kids' cartoon series.

Years and years ago an innovation called 'Ingress' that was designed and produced by the Google-owned game company Niantic was released worldwide and it made a little tiny impact, mostly among what marketers call 'the early adopters.' Ingress is the same as, and better than, Pokemon Go - as far as being an actual 'game' goes. But so what? People cannot handle 'better,' they can only handle 'corny...'

The Fed says - and everyone believes them - that they can produce money out of thin air, and also, that they can make money 'free.' And everyone believes them.

So, if you are a serous professional investor - and most of those who read here are - then it will pay you to continue to note that Rolls Royce the car company, does not chase numbers; it chases those who aggregate money. And such people are few, and rare. Now Ford, on the other hand, or Kelloggs, well they do chase numbers - and they get them too. And so do politicians chase numbers because that's what democracy is all about.

Even Rolls Royce the aircraft engine manufacturers today announced they would be stepping back their output of engines because of the Qatar Air purchasing situation, but that they would still be highly profitable. 

Tony the Stock Market Tiger will never Crash,
because he is a PVC punching 'doll.' 

When you chase numbers, and your margins are thin, it is easy to forget where your vulnerabilities are... They are in the numbers. So long as the Fed has banks to absorb the bond issues for collateral and liquidity, then it has no problem. But we are actually a long way down the road from banks actually 'making decisions' about the form of their collateral for loan liquidity. They need to use the Fed's bonds and its pricing of money. And that is because of the outlandish size of their obligations - and of the obligations of their clients who create the demand for their money. You see no one will undertake the risk of funding the capital required to meet the on-going debt bill from the past that has carried through to today - not with 'street cash' anyway. There are no retail equity investors. And don't let the media fool you about it; there aren't any.

I would be looking exclusively at small output, small number, real money ventures only, as far as investing is concerned. Everything else, in spite of the unlikelihood of a market Crash this year, is fantasy fiction and it will never return you any profits. 

Chilcot V. Hutton

The Hutton Inquiry - not the Report, the very existence of the Inquiry itself, is crystalline proof that Tony Blair has a problem that the Chilcot Report is blurring over.

Sir John Chilcot's two million word Report about whether or not Tony Blair or his government is responsible in some legal or ethical way for the Iraq Invasion categorically says that the intelligence services 'evidence' for Saddam's WMD's was overstated.

But you see, someone needs to explain the death of Dr. David Kelly. The Hutton Inquiry was about his death, but at the time it was not set up to deal with the substance of Kelly's actual infamy, namely that he accused the spying agencies of sexing up the evidence about WMD's.

Everybody knew what the 'story' with Dr. Kelly was - it was that he was a whistle-blower about the faked WMD intelligence. And that 'story' caused there to be an official inquiry into how he might have died... LOL. 

Let's blame the Russians! - hint: it wasn't the Russians...

He was murdered. It's simple as that.

Or well, maybe he wasn't murdered because Hutton never found there was conclusive evidence that he was murdered. Same way though, that there was conclusive evidence of course that Saddam had WMD's. Ha! What a laugh. 

But Chilcot DID find that Blair overstated the case for war with Saddam for no valid reasons...

Okay so then why did Blair ignore or dismiss Kelly's complaints? What is the reason today, that Tony Blair gives for his not having taken any note of what Kelly was saying back then?

He's not given any reason, because he has not been asked. Two million words and not one question about this crucial item.

Why, if Blair was aware of charges of falsity over the 'evidence' about WMD's at the time did he justify using the WMD's as the excuse for war. At least Chilcot has the decency to say this critical point: 'war was not the last resort in this case.'

No indeed it was not! For of course, we all know it was the first resort; the main resort, and the only resort.

You see it's not really open for Blair to say 'I misjudged;' for he made a decision based on knowingly potentially false information. He knew that Dr Kelly was raising objections about the veracity of the information. He didn't misjudge anything. He blotted out the contrary information, he obscured it, he deliberately disregarded it, and ultimately, someone killed off the officer waving the flag about it.

So - do you think everyone in the UK upper echelons and the elite are 'okay' with this? Do you think 'M' of James Bond fiction would just 'turn a blind eye?'

I'd have a 'Jill Bond' or a 'Jane Bond' in this saga, and she
would have a car like this, above. There'd still be a 'James Bond' too.
There'd be both. It's a modern world, you know.

No, certainly not. 'M' might well ask if there was something behind the war escapade besides just plain stupidity and the weapons industry lobby.

He might resort initially to Katherine Graham's UN Commission Report of the 1980's into Western industrial involvement inside Iraq in illegal weapons and arms manufacturing.

And he might consult actual people inside say, the German chemical industry, and heavy machinery industries, to find out the 'inside skinny' on what was going on (that is to say, if he didn't already know).

Lord West - he's a top man

Now see if I were running the UK government (LOL!) I would quickly move to have (retired) Admiral Lord West head MI6 right away. And Lord West, not being a Conservative, might easily decide to take an axe to the Department and throw out all those who had been installed inside there from recommendations and support from so-called 'allies and partners' with a lot of money and pull and who fund and push their own people through higher academic degrees to make impression on the recruiters at these places.

And if I were not running the UK government, and I were Lord West, and knew what was going on all the same - as he does do - then it would tempting to have some zillionaire benefactor help me pull together a private 'think tank' or 'institute for the advancement of...' And personally, I would be recruiting people from ex the Black Watch and the Coldstream Guard and this kind of thing, or World Champion athletes, perhaps from the Martial Arts or at least certainly of World Competition Class. And the purpose of this organization would be to go and ask the questions that political Inquiries don't, and to find out the unbiased truth - as most government inquiries do not either. 

And I would make those Reports very very public indeed. With the zillionaire's money of course. 

And I can tell you right now I know where our new 'W' would send his agents and get them to look.

And boy would you find some 'skeletons' and some dead bodies buried away!


  

White Painted Guns

Here is the beginning of our new, latest, let's call it 'fan-fiction' Bond story. 

If you have a lot of money you can get credits as part of the production - personally I would like to talk to Katy Perry's agents and suggest she collaborates with Illenium & Said The Sky to do a duet with Cristina Soto on the Main Theme Song (the video below). Frankly I don't see how the production wouldn't generate up in the billions of dollars.

Our Bond is going to have a tiny gun - he won't need
too much anyway, something for genuine close
personal protection that's all. (5-shot S&W 60)

But believe me, the one challenging consideration will be the way I depict modern spy agencies for you and it won't be happy for them, as the old days 'Bond Franchise' has let them get away with being seen as...

In fact, it's doubtful if my Bond will be working for MI6 anymore. But he would be taking a close look at the previously 'migrants without a green card' who volunteered as medics or translators under Obama's plan (not to mention the idiot Tony Blair had the same thing going on) and who ended up in the military or in the White House or in the CIA. Oh yes. You can rest assured there are a WHOLE BUNCH of Islamists inside these groups you pay your taxes to and for.

But watch the video. There are people who know what is going on and if they play their hand it is not going to be pretty for the media and the PC world. You might even think there really are aliens or angels involved... Put it this way - it's going to take more than what the CIA and the entire military of the United States has got to put this right now. So you'd better hope and pray that there are benevolent advanced agencies around.

How It's Really Done

You've never heard any report about what was found in the bloodstreams of any suicide bomber or terrorist who was apprehended or whose body parts were recovered.

And I will leave that part right there because if I tell you what is found in them people will know I have certain knowledge I shouldn't be disclosing. Partly though, there is a high concentration of a cannabinoid derivative - and this already places a focus on Saudi Arabia because it is produced in chemical laboratories owned by Saudis; and no where else.

So at minimum we know that drug techniques are used.

The President of the United States of America, bows to 'King' Abdullah, a dynasty set
 up by my family thanks to my father's aunt, Dame Gertrude Bell of MI6 

I think it's most unfortunate that people like CNN are employing CIA propaganda agents to divert attention away from actual Muslim sources of terrorist training and insisting on drawing a false trail into, for example - 'ex-Russian military trained personnel.' That's just outright rubbish in the first place but it is also desperately dangerous a thing to say because it serves to distract and take attention away from where it should be focused in order to prevent future attacks.

You HAVE to pay attention to how it becomes possible to get a young person to be so prepared to give up their life doing violence against others, and often, against civilians. Nobody sensibly believes citizens and voters REALLY have that much control over modern Western governments. For Godsake! Even in Austria today we find that elections are rigged sufficiently for an independent court to rule that they must be held all over again!

No sensible person will hold an ordinary civilian personally and directly responsible for any act of their government even if you took, for example, the Palestine cause as the justification. Which has some arguable merits, but then, these are not clear-cut either when you examine them very closely. If you simply go by what is actually in the Quran, it specifically says there that Palestine belongs to the Jews!! So, the conflict CANNOT be an Islamic one - it might be a Palestinian political one, but what makes it something Islamic terrorists need to adopt...?

So we are not talking about genuine grievance here; we are talking something much different from that. 

We are talking about a systematic ideology (and an active methodology) that can turn a person's rational mind into a robot consciousness that kills itself in the act of dealing death and destruction to others.

What is this about?

It's about certain clever people right at the top or let's say, the centre of the ideology. And that centre is in Saudi Arabia.

What they do is they plan, and they locate, and they work on young kids mainly, who they turn out as willing suicide agents of death and destruction. And they use secret or covert parallel communication systems inside large major communications corporates that they own worldwide, to enable a fairly secure means of communication.

The main principle behind how they do it is that at some quite early stage, they get the person involved in not so much in (as some psychologists have suspected) 'locus-of-control' manipulation, but in experiences of monolithic consciousness sharing among a set of peers (shared women, shared sexual experiences, shared drug and other arousal techniques) and then they have an unusual technique in which they 'blot out' the actual sense of self or even the actual memory of the individual whilst at the same time hyper-activating their pleasure senses and experiences of pleasure. This is a real thing that they do. There are whole entire facilities designed and built and dedicated to this.

At a point, the individual comes to accept as part of their experience, a daily process of loss of memory - and this why when you look at these people's eyes, they have a certain stare about them. But it's not just a 'blank stare.'

What they do is combine repetitive messages to the effect that the person is somehow 'superior' and by continuously providing them with experiential feedback from drugs and other pleasure sources, the individual becomes confident in their daily regime: what happens, what is happening, what is going on, what is done, what they feel. It is far from the case that the person is drowsy, or 'drugged' in that sense. They are highly 'activated,' in fact. But at the same time they've lost their discriminating personal ego.

Any normal sense or feelings of anxiety about consequences becomes drowned in the consistent and repeated and strong pattern of memory-losing 'sleep' followed by high pleasure centre activations. As time passes, ever higher sensations are needed as the human system adjusts to the neurotransmitter inputs - risk and risk-taking is just another means to achieve more pleasure. The moral justification is provided by the asserted religious ideas, but the personal and moral judgement ego is lost through the systematic 'entrainment' process and procedures.

It is simply not the case that these automaton killers just 'go into seclusion' for months and then suddenly come out with the backpack bombs. In fact there are women being provided to them inside the 'safe-houses.' 

And this is a little-known fact that could be used by intelligence agencies but isn't. And why not? I could tell you but you wouldn't believe me. There are many compromised sections of society in this affair. 

You can't drive this and survive too long if you are on
cannabinoids 

If you think, as the media may have led you on to believe, that all of this is just some 'accidental, incidental, unplanned' state of affairs you are very much mistaken. This is all extremely highly well thought out with ultra malice aforethought, and a great deal of psychological, political, and financial sophistication going on.

But it won't be until sooner or later, the public will wake up when something happens that is just that little bit 'going too far.' Just yet, everyone has been boiled very slowly, and they don't worry that someone needs to be brought to account for all of it even up till so far. Why is that?

If I killed ten thousand innocent civilians over twenty years around the Western World, don't you think someone would wake up to it? Add it up... It's a lot more than ten thousand.

But if I said to you this is all quite deliberately planned by the academics inside the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia you would quail, would you not?

Benghazi?

Beneath the surface of the House Subcommittee Benghazi Report lies a concept that people who read here might be interested in considering - and no one else will, of course.

It is certainly true, as Lionel Nation often reminds us, that in US Courts it is not required to demonstrate motivation for a murder, just that the murder was carried out, including how it was carried out. That is to say -, anything, everything, but not why.

Why, was it necessary for the operatives to change from military uniforms to civilian clothes (which apparently happened several times back and forth from 'military' to 'civilian' and back, as people decided what to actually do)?

The underlying motivation is to do with President Obama - rather than Hillary Clinton, who, if you take her at her own word, said 'what does it matter at this point...?'

Clinton is not the one who cared then or who cares now about whether anyone should have been found 'in military uniform fighting back the Islamic terrorists.'

No no no; this is ENTIRELY Barack Obama's motivating cause. You see under no circumstances does he want it to be seen clearly that there is strong concerted and sustained Islamic aggression against the USA or the West generally. Sure Hillary signs up to this but not because she is the leader of the policy - for one thing, she is neither now nor ever will be, the President. She does not care either way, and she has said so. And in this, we should believe her.

We are not told why, by the House Subcommittee, either.

But believe me, it is the why that is the crucial thing.

Why, is Obama pretending there is not a war by Muslims against the West. There is actually a war.

And let me prove something to you - name me one single thing that ISIS has done which is NOT specifically approved of by Muhammad, or commanded in the Quran. ISIS = Islam.

But you see the problem with pretending that this is not happening, or that Islam is not the thing driving it, means that you and I (the public generally) will not see the enemy coming over the ridge. An honest decent person - who happens to be by birth and culturally, a Muslim - does not necessarily understand what he or she is reading in the Arabic, regardless of whether they recite the Quran or not. Most Muslims are not ever told what the Quran actually says in the language they speak - they recite the thing phonetically and by rote. 

What a good Muslim looks like - or,
what a Muslim looks like, anyway

And that means that by denying the truth to the honest decent person, and allowing the Wahabis to assert publicly and to ignorant Muslims whatever lie they want to tell about Islam, without challenge, a set of conditions is enabled that permits professionally brainwashed killers and suicide candidates to exist within the 'ordinary' Muslim community undetected. And I'm not simply talking about this 'taqiyya' ideology talked about in the Quran. I am talking about sophisticated psychological techniques of brainwashing. 

And worst of all, no one - not even the CIA - knows or understands how these people are being twisted into so easily giving up their own lives in mad attacks. It is possible to understand what the methods used to 'train' suicide operatives and killers, are. These methods are sourced from inside Saudi Arabia but shipped to other places too - and they are practiced in dedicated and quite open institutions and facilities in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia under the purview of the official government there.

I will outline some of the key elements of the methodology - which is highly successful one must add - in the next article.