Ascot When Not At Bilderberg

It's high summer in England and that means the race tracks are not as much of a quagmire as they otherwise usually are, and Sheikh Hamdan is likely to be in attendance on one of the major tracks somewhere.

Shamal Wind - will probably be wearing
different colours, maybe red and white,
in the King's Stand Stakes on Tuesday. 

10 million dollars buys you a day at the ISIL front if you are the US government, or a truly great racehorse - say something like the Sheikh's new acquisition, Brazen Beau.

Although entered for Tuesday's King's Stand Stakes at Ascot, the horse will more likely appear in the Diamond Jubilee Stakes a couple of weeks later on.

Another horse, Shamal Wind - which is quite a different kind of horse, has the ability to do amazing things in the King's Stand Stakes but it will depend on whether the surface of the track is not too treacherous and is able to provide some reasonable footing for genuinely attacking sprinters.

These kinds of races are not the sort of thing I gamble serious money on but they are intensely interesting all the same, partly because of the sheer frisson of the Ascot Track itself, and partly because if the really quick horses run to their capability on the day you will witness something truly special indeed.

Shamal Wind has one of the most amazing finishing bursts of any racehorse I have ever seen and is a sight to behold on her day.

How can the Sheikh be expected to waste his time at the Bilderberg Conference when he has the Ascot King's Stand Stakes to go to!

Interesting people do interesting things,
like have tea and Persian Fairy Floss.

He's a sensible man, the Sheikh. He owns a different horse in the same race - Muthmir - which isn't a bad horse by any means, but it isn't as exciting as Shamal Wind. This is definitely a fascinating race to watch. 

And I will be watching it. I'm not interested in things like the Bilderberger silly nonsense anymore. Unless Alex Jones or someone can come up with something entertaining about it. It's a bunch of crooks holding hands. And? The point is?

So they don't want us to know what they are talking about...So what. I don't want to know. Because no one there has any brains and they are never going to be able to say anything of interest to me anyway... I'm just not interested.



   

'The Greeks Imagined...'

For reasons that are unclear to me, you will see, all over the internet, when searching for information or commentaries about many subjects, very repetitious stock phrases that use presumptions that are virtually never challenged anywhere, but become the substance particularly of academic peer reviewed studies and of course, conclusions.

Here's an example: 'the Greeks imagined the Universe to be like the inside of a large brass bowl, with stars being kinds of jewels that are placed as adornments in the heavens.'

Oh very poetic.

Which 'Greeks,' I wonder, are being referred to here.

The Ancient Greeks imagined a forest
to be a bunch of trees!
Well fancy that.

Would it perhaps the satirist playwright Aristophanes, who was trying to poke fun at the wives of Athenian politicians left at home in the kitchens whilst their husbands were considering lofty matters of State elsewhere...

Or perhaps it was one of the speeches of a droll character inside one of the comedies.

'The Greeks.' This is a blanket presumption that all Greeks of ancient times all held the same view about a particular something - or about anything; which is so absurd an idea as to be more than slightly bizarre to my mind at least. And yet - this is the kind of taken-for-granted statement that abounds in today's world in which 'scientists' are completely right about everything all of the time.

'Hadron' comes from a Greek word that means 'huge.' And so the massive equipment that causes small particles to collide into each other at the stated 'considerable energy,' certainly, if nothing else, comes at a huge monetary cost.

It is not easy to challenge the various speech-makers everywhere on Ted Talks and other platforms for the mainstream mind-leaders, because no one will ever be afforded the chance to ask one of them, 'well, what Greek have you ever read fully?' I remember getting into an argument with the Dean of the Philosophy Department at the University I attended when I asked why it appeared the main lecturer seemed to only know of commentaries on various ancient Greek texts but had never seemed to know actually what was in the source texts themselves and never had a single source text on their book list. 

Moreover, once it comes to exact definitions and translations of words, we get into the rarified atmosphere in which virtually no one at all lives these days! So much so that proper names get regularly mistaken for ordinary nouns and their adjectival uses go missing.

BUT - someone seems to know what are in some of the old texts, because a lot of modern science (albet admittedly using modern instruments to 'produce' 'data') is just the re-naming using modern era words, and the attribution to modern people, of things that were long ago discovered or known. And then, when that won't do, there is this 'cutting in two' of some mysterious object (like a sub-atomic particle) and the consequent pronoucement about some new discovery of a particle or its force or characteristic.

Max Planck

The last truly great item of quantum science that was really discovered was Planck's Constant - if for no other obvious reason than that as an actual number, it is not some '1' (unity) or its opposite (and therefore '2' in total) or the 'up' or 'down,' or left or right spin through some axis of some otherwise perfectly unknown 'thing' said to exist.

Will Self, the radical journalist, after having been given a guided tour of the CERN facility, said he thought the whole thing was a scam designed to extract a whole of money from a group of governments - but it could not be that. Scientists are never motivated by money. Or power.

Being motivated by money and power would put them back in the time of the 1738 CE (means also 1738 AD) creation by the Rajput king Sawai Singh of the mysterious Jantar Mantar - which is widely and incorrectly translated these days once again all over the internet as the 'calculations formulae' structure. In fact it means the HUGE MAGICAL OCULUS - a machine or mechanism through which the king could see into the past and the future and all over space, and also via which he could cast magical chants in order to exert power over anyone or everyone. 

The trouble with people who find much to argue with me over this perspective, is that none of them have read any of the Greek texts that go into the ontology of arithmetic, and the ontology of geometry - and the calculus extensions in those texts into what we now call quantum level mechanics, and the nature of the Universe.

What is true is that 'the Greeks did not imagine,' anything about the Universe - except those Greeks who were writers of fantasy stories. And as far as 'the IIluminati' goes, well, Pythagoras never imparted anything to students who were not with him consistently for fourteen years! So I'm not sure how 'what the Greeks knew or imagined' is known to anyone not actually inside those Pythagorean Schools for one example of 'the Greeks.'

The functional value of Planck's Constant appears in the nuclear bomb. The functional value of the Higgs Boson, much to many people's disappointment, has not yet appeared anywhere.

However, I note that the 'Higgs Boson' is the symmetrical opposite (thus 1 thing of 2 things...) of either the fundamental particle or force or unit type of energy of the ordinary electromagnetic field. It is opposite because it cannot be turned off. And because it cannot be turned off, we can not ever observe it by differentiation. Scientists however know that it exists. As surely as there are grant funders who exist. 

The Delhi Jantar Mantar. Inside the structures and outside all around
are strange metal devices and instruments,
beautifully made and with obscure symbols all over them,
though at least one of them, is a sundial.

Trust me, if you invert the Higgs Boson field by causing it to rotate around its own axis ( if you could find one thereof) incredibly fast, you can create a black hole in the positive pole, whereupon it can eat itself continuously and yet spew itself back out through the negative pole - however each subsequent packet of spewed re-circulated particles is a new Universe; which is a way we get into 'String Theory.' String Theory, as you know, is a bunch of numbers but not just any numbers, they are the exact same numbers we ordinarily use every day, it's just that er, er, er, they are named after a prominent modern scientist that fell down in yesterday's shower of rain in Oxford or somewhere. Lucky us. Everything is so different because of today's science. So, so, different.

God people were so stupid in the past. Up until Planck, people looked at atomic and sub-atomic particles, but after Einstein, we can now look into 'space' and 'time!' 

Tomorrow, we will be able to to look into smoke and mirrors too. Smoke and mirrors do exist, because they are possibly the symmetrical antitheses of space and time. Not ordinary 'smoke' and 'mirrors' of course, you understand, but 'smoke x 2 to the 1/3 power >*&^$^&*^^$#' and 'mirrors x square root of !%$#$%$#%^.'

The Ozymandias Economy

So, if you go to the 42nd floor of the Leadenhall Building in London - which is an 'events dining venue' rather than an actual commercial restaurant - you will see the typical wine and water glasses, silver knives and forks and spoons, and candelabra, and white table clothes, of the Georgian style of London upper class dining.

Leadenhall Building is the tallest, triangular thing

Which all seems a bit peculiar if you consider the actual building itself - which is all steel and ballistic-proof glass and hailed as ultra-modern.

Down below somewhere, if you look at the skyline of all these new buildings in the City of London - down below near the Leadenhall Building somewhere - is the old Leadenhall Market which I showed you last week.

The Leadenhall Building is on the site of the old P&O premises designed by family connections of mine so I'll have to admit to the potential for prejudice. All the same, modern architecture conducted for the large trusts that bank pension and superannuation funds largely, is missing the elements of true modernity when it comes to actual modern life and lifestyle.

Koishimaru silk interior of a high end spa

If you compare what interior designers do for the high end luxury private spas around the globe, you will find not merely the usual 'modern-esque' commitment to simple and clear lines, but also the desire to be around luxurious textures, and emotional motifs. Today's expensive architecture of tall buildings on the other hand is really just an extension of Brutalism, and a fetish for certain materials - glass and steel and aluminium.

 

For me it is a wonder that so much money in the hands of mindless and talentless and artless committees can have stayed intact for so long - there is no possibility they are making the right decisions over the investment of those funds just as they are very far short of what modern technology and materials innovations and genuine architecture and design can do.

But then, there were also Pharaohs for a long time too, and it was only Shelley the poet who really put the final line under them two thousand year after they had already long died out!

Often, because we are living life, we neither see what we are looking at, nor comprehend what we are witnessing, nor do the ants themselves understand their own position. The ancient classical Sanskrit philosophers knew about ants - they wrote that every one of them thinks he alone is the King of Worlds. If it's not hydrogen embrittlement, it is Osama, and if not Osama, then some asteroid.

Asteroid? Did I say, 'asteroid?' Mistake, I'm sure. 

Some Back-grounding

I suppose, as far as everything that is publicly known goes, one could hardly go past Sydney Biddle Barrows to see who operates the naked masked parties filled with sexually available females - so long as the price is paid... A la 'Eyes Wide Shut' of course.

But my point today is, that the world progresses, too. It changes, goes forward, moves ahead and away from the motifs of the past.

So for this post I shall show a few scenes of the past, and ask readers to realize that these images no longer fit into the world as it is now. And yet, the propaganda lingers on in the popular conspiracy mindsets that are everywhere; even mainstream reporters joke about it.

This is the City of London Masonic Hall
the Latin above the architrave says 'Heard, Seen, Silent.' 

And so here we have the fairly typical Manly Hall astrology, the major star symbol, its effulgence, the ladder going up to it, the pillars, and so on.

The City of London is a place full of old and old-fashioned places and shapes - yet, they mostly all date to just after WWII, because everything was flattened in the War. 

It's May and the Chelsea Flower Show is on. I am not a great fan of this, it's a bit olde worlde for me - another thing that has this lingering attachment to a not so-great-past though one that has a reputation, if undeserved.

Leadenhall Market, London

But I do like Leadenhall Market inside the City of London - here you will also find flowers, especially at this time of year.

Leadenhall is old too, and makes a play of it oldness, but somehow for me, it never seems contrived nor pretentious.

I think Masonry and Illuminism is highly contrived and pretentious. But it attracts those who seek advantage through knowing powerful people who they assume to be in charge. Everyone wants to believe someone is in charge up there.

No one is.

I hear, I see, but I am not silent. No one is watching here though. I hope you were listening when the mainstream media announced that ISIS claims it can have a nuclear device within a year from Pakistan.

We're going to see a horrible, horrible set of events unfold and I'm not so sure the so-called 'power elite' have the foggiest clue where this will all end.

Too bad. And serves them jolly right too. 

After this 'backgrounder' we shall be moving back to the modern world in the next post here.

And Now We Strike

In theory, around this time of the year - May - London should be bathed in sunshine. I've never seen the sun shining in London at any time myself, so I don't know whether the theory stands up in practice... : )

Here's a pic of the London that I know:

Outside the Stafford Hotel -
a nice, small place, but with some genuine style.

You may find some old gentlemen in here or hereabouts, who would have a copy of something Manly P. Hall somewhere. Up the road a little you will find Julian Assange, who could easily have a copy of Raynor Johnson too, or even Douglas Fawcett.

All revolutionaries no doubt, even whilst sipping their afternoon tea...

The super-duper wealthy elite, as Chris Hedges tells us, buy and sell these old places - such as the Stafford - at will and on a whim, apparently. They care little about culture and tradition, and even less for actual people. They are themselves of course, not people, but greedy people with no boundaries their egos cannot cross.

London Stafford 'gentleman's tea'

Not for them the dainties of high tea. They require more substantial fare after forking out a quarter of a billion for a rather nice modern art painting. And even Osama bin Laden, the Arab billionaire, required more than tea and biscuits after expending some money knocking down a couple of tall buildings in Manhattan - no, indeed. He, fed his mind on Manly Palmer Hall, the Rosicrucian. It's a gross mistake to characterize Hall as a mason, although he was known as one, considered one by others, called himself one... Hall was one of the very first in modern times to point to 'Illuminism' as possibly the name to call the secret and highly-placed power elite who conspiracy theorists like to say run the world.

Hall is only a mason the same way Sherlock Holmes was accepted by the dark crafters, or artists, as one...

Manly Hall is of course, as you will all know, required reading within the CIA.

Anyway, on to matters of tea. May/June is the season for cocktail parties among the wealthy elite. And I have been invited to some over the coming few weeks.

Now I don't know who the 'ruling elite of the world' actually are, myself, but I know there was only ever one Caesar, and that all the rest of the subsequent little 'Caesars' wanted what he had. 

'Let me say just this though, and let me make it perfectly clear -' (This was a favourite phrase of the now-deceased ex-Premier of New South Wales in Australia, the estimable Neville Wran). Caesar would not have been seen knocking down one or two buildings. Maybe the entire city of Washington, sure. Or Tel Aviv or both at the same time. 

You will not find MPH in my library, at any rate.

If you want to rule the world, you must lead. Not throw something and skulk away. Not that I am particularly criticizing bin Laden for skulking exactly. But neither was he ever any kind of revolutionary leader nor are any of the faceless men running the Big Five accountancies who are the ultimate Masonic chiefs - any kind of leader like Caesar was. Caesar Augustus is probably the patron saint, as it were, of accountants - he wants to take credit for everything and he definitely succeeded in marketing the idea that he was something special.

And when you look at the so-called tech and new economy billionaires these are not leaders either. Not in this way of political and social 'Pharos.' 

A real leader, in the modern era - today's era - most be able to franchise an idea. That is to say, have people be drawn by logic to a compelling new idea they themselves never saw before but know in their heart-of-hearts, is true and valuable and useful to them.

I say 'franchise,' because I don't think that, now, simply everyone can grasp what is necessary to comprehend about where we are all going and what it will look like there and what the power mechanisms will be.

Chris Hedges makes an extremely important point in some of his interviews and writings: 'it's not about the level of education of the criminals who have wrecked the world - it's not about educated people, it's about greedy people.'

Understanding the psychology of greedy people... is something Osama bin Laden would have been better advised looking into, than any mystical concepts either masons hold, or that the formation of the United States is based upon - whether simple freedom or liberty, or notions about democracy and endeavour and capitalism.

I think I am more dangerous than Osama bin Laden by many multiples.

I know how to pull the actual levers of the so-called 'super-wealthy elite or oligarchic rulers' rather than simply yanking on a chain you wrapped around their collective necks.

And so do you know how to do it, if you think about it...