And Suddenly The Future

Everything in popular human ideologies is about the future - what will be if only (usually you do this or that or the other thing).

So I'm reading this summary of a dozen psychologists' inputs from literally fifty years ago (this is the thing to do with the fake Alien invasion), and to cut a very long story short, because my family was at the very top of a national education system somewhere (in fact all over the Southern Hemisphere because they advised on the formulation of the Oxford & Cambridge Matriculation Exams for all Brit Commonwealth countries way back some long time ago now) - because of that, I personally ended up knowing families who were at the time and for decades afterwards, the owners of the main Western (though not so much the German who now dominate everywhere) publishing companies. All of them. One way or another.

The pen is cheap.
the ink, not so much.

But what that also means is that if I wanted to get access to all the scribbling, the notes, the original editor's points, the fly leaf notes from galley proofs still around archived somewhere, for major published works, to some extent I could - although not so much now because most of those families have 'died out;' or else the kids are doing other things entirely and in one or two cases literally sent all the archive material to the rubbish tip.

That's 'to cut a long story short' and also to avoid breaking contracts if you know what I mean.

In other words, if it's vaguely stuff that could be construed as 'out in the public arena already,' well then I don't feel too obliged to keep a lid on it.

So, 'summary of psychologists' recommendations.'

I'm reading in here their definition of 'intelligence' by which they are intending to mean sentience and human intelligence, and by a particular narrowly-defined extension in the instance in question: any kind of sentient intelligence including from elsewhere not this planet.

They say: a being that can take care of itself, can maintain it's own life, and reproduce.

Well that's just ridiculous, but it is the typical kind of stupid Richard Dawkins blather you will get from any one of half a dozen current 'science presenters.'

Today, the brands are 
kind of 'fake' - the
industrial houses
that make the fabric and
dye it are what drives
the highest end.

The real definition of a sentient intelligence centers around only one thing apart from cognizance of itself (the Ego): the permanent need to solve problems.

Take the Christian God - and let's even grant that It has solved 'Death' and is both Eternal Itself as well as is able to make dead human live (again).

Still It has problems to solve!

The biggest one being that while It has absolved some humans of their past bad behaviors, there remains the problem of how to have them co-operate with this 'plan' not to keep doing said bad behaviors from a fundamental internal character fracture...

The way that the usual pop followers of the Christian fashion, style it, well, 'God' being All-Powerful just blinks and nods like Jeannie in the TV Sitcom, and everything is 'fixed' kun faya kun.

And, humans are not so happy with that idea and psychologists are definitely not happy with it.

Thinking minds want to know about 'the process!' 

The Doctor/Pharmacy racket has a process, which is to 'disappear' through the use of mind or neural signalling line-altering drugs, that a person ever even had a particular desire, let's say in the more obvious scenarios. It isn't quite 'kun faya kun' but it does involved a certain disappearing act section of the process. So, pretty good; pretty magic.

Brainwashed people don't want to know or need to know about the process.

Everybody else wants to know about the process.

Gary Numan (real name Gary Anthony James Webb) was channeling the mind-controlled individual Philip K. Dick (at least, that's what Professor Darrell Hamamoto says that he was and I'm inclined to think he might be right) and the movie 'Blade Runner' when he penned this intense experience that you can witness yourself in the video clip below.

And all of them Numan, Dick, Ridley Scott - were peering at a future through the lens of Sci-Fi, which as you know is a front for Anglo-America 'Intelligence' and public programming (Hamamoto cites Marion Bradley as a tell-tale fingermark of it, and again, he's completely correct).

Pure, Nazi Germanic, even
Weimar pre-WWII
iconography.
Is Helmut Newton work.

And they were coming up with this idea about manufactured 'beings;' androids with some kind of sentience and definitely a high level of intelligent - so much so that they would pose a threat.

Now I don't see things that way myself, on account I have actually seen androids - built beings with 'inserted' intelligence as well as sentience; but we are really talking about gigantic leaps ahead of the technology and science of the human race as it is today.

When I look at the standard pop culture - and by this I mean what pervades all University campuses worldwide - I look at cultural figures of the modern 'art world' such as Helmut Newton.

I never met Helmut Newton but I knew his 'key grip' and actual negative film developing person well (there were at least two that I was aware of, both of whom I knew -, one much more than the other).

The one I knew well, was a game-fishing partner of the actor Lee Marvin.

Helmut Newton was one of those who originated from Germany and was not part of this 'Operation Paperclip' thing in a big way, but might have been in a small way as a 'sideways' intel asset however; put it that way. It really doesn't mean anything that he was a Jew, because half the German Nazi scientists were Jews!

My own view is that Helmut Newton was more than just 'enabled' by his wife June. I think to a large extent his work was her psychological framing of his pretty run-of-the-mill pre-WWII Berlin social ideology (or 'socio-sexual' ideology).

Helmut Newton photographed Marlene Dietrich and not many people, I think, realize that.

Gary Numan's work has this troubled or disturbed dream sense about it. Not a nightmare, but an unsettled dream.

This - is a thousand dollars.
This thing alone, all by
itself, is one thousand
dollars and you need to
know how to tell 
this kind of thing at twenty paces.

The music and the art of Numan's work lies in his ability to convey the unresolved and undying, lingering desire (of the human). The longing for partnership that is equivalent on the most rigorously democratic of terms.

Along with the ludicrous definition of intelligence, came another nostrum about how (and this was a modern - new - addition to the old paperwork; gulp, just gave away something there) studies have been done that show that males look the same way at a good-looking female regardless of how the females are dressed, but that females look at males very differently depending on what the male has on.

Just shows how modern scientists and psychologists have themselves been so dumbed-down by their own relentless propaganda and Tavistock-ery, that they missed that dynamics between the sexes - what used to be called 'the War of the Sexes' - is asymmetric warfare when it is conducted.

It's not so much that women 'see' a man differently, but that both of them behave differently and react and respond differently -, when they have set themselves into particular contexts.

You can tell me all you like about what your research study 'discovered' but I am not then necessarily going to tell you, KP (lol, you heard me) what to wear...