Theatrical Pantomime, NOT Illuminati!

There's no Illuminati nuthin' at any of these things like the Met Gala red carpet.

This is strictly theatrical pantomime - and always has been. I would even suggest Diaghilev has touches of the panto - he was most certainly of the 'morally decadent' kind (that Stalinist Russia did not approve of). Diaghilev's costumes was one of the early 'Met Gala' themes...

We're talking the New York Metropolitan Museum of Art Costume Institute (a separate division within the museum organization). We're not talking the New York Metropolitan OPERA (also referred to sometimes as 'the Met').

This is Mrs Martin Shafiroff - and she's a more high profile
New York super elite socialite, basically her husband is a public funds manager...
So the profile in charities works on several levels. But these Galas are totally
different to the Met Gala. And they don't make the media. Usually.

But you won't see the 'costume' part actually attached to the 'Museum of Art' phrase in Wiki's BS page, especially not where it relates to costumes from 'theater.' What the Wiki says is that the thing was formerly known as 'the Costume Institute Gala.' But that's not right: 'THE Costume Institute' IS the NY Met Museum of Art.  

It's just a fact that the modern world is so literally 'dumbed-down,' that countries go to war, terrorism takes place, and acts and actions affecting millions of people's lives proceed from sheer ignorance that is grossly exploited by very malicious but highly-cognizant globalist agenda political groups. And their scheme runs quite broadly.

For example, all you hear these days from the standard supposedly 'Sunni' but otherwise still globalist propaganda machines - be they actual Muslims or just the BBC and the like - is that 1. Muslims 'have' Jesus in the form of some identity 'Issa' spoken about in the Quran; and 2. and Christians dispute that this is so because Muslims do not identify 'Issa' as any kind of literal, actual 'son' of God and nor did he (Issa) die on the cross.

A section of page from the actual 'Blue Quran.'

Well these are not facts. Mu'tazila Muslims definitely have the same conception of the Word of God that Christians do, and moreover, the Quran itself says it. And it says it in several places that are often avoided in this type of discussion.

The Mu'tazil (orginal, actual) version of the Quran is in the New York Metropolitan Museum and so far, no one from any 'Islamic' parts of the world have demanded it 'back.' And that's probably because - in my view - today's 'Muslims' have moved very far away from any real need to understand what the Arabic text actually says or means (the latter of which is called 'Islamic interpretation' or tawil). 

There's a lot of ignorance in today's world...

...the Met has nothing to do with authentic occult rituals or real occult groups. 

If you want real high level occult stuff, you cannot expect to find same in obvious, made-for-the-public-consumption symbolism or activities and festivals. The Edinburgh Festival's 'Queen of the May' fire celebrations which present depictions of the so-called 'Green Man' - some kind of Arcadian figure with horns on his head (ergo, must be the Devil and Satan, yes? LOL)  - is exactly NOT an occult thing. Even though every young man/woman/other and their dog wishes it so.

As I have explained before, 'the Green Man' (in fact it's 'the LITTLE Green Man') in authentic occult circles, is the Sun. 

Authentic, genuine, occult May Festival 'fire ritual...'
The Baked Alaska.