Now I am quite sure that what Jose Bustani said is completely valid. And, he basically said that John Bolton was not someone you can 'have a dialogue' with - I guess that means he is one-sided and presents people with a fait accompli position.
Chemical Weapons prohibition place in Europe... |
John Bolton, if you examine his history carefully, has most certainly been an assertive and argumentative personality as far as diplomatic niceties have been concerned.
His advantage though, is that he is not as easily (mis)lead by various malicious factions inside of the Security Establishments and can 'hold the line' against these sorts when they try to pull a swifty over the President and the government generally.
He is on record as saying that the Clinton email 'hacking' was not a hacking but a deliberate data download and in all probability, even started out life as a 'false flag' affair. I mean he is ON RECORD as saying this.
And that's a good thing.
An extremely good thing. Because as National Security Adviser with this kind of view he is going to have enormous sway over what stance the White House will have on Robert Mueller... ...who may have been intrinsic in such a 'false flag.'
Jose Bustani is undoubtedly a good man and an honest man. And he may well be quite right about Bolton. But in my view the single biggest threat to global security today is people like Robert Mueller and the fact they have to be stood up to by people who can do the job.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Your considered comments are welcome