Al Waleed

I guess it's time for me to tell you all the truth about Prince Al Waleed bin Talal bin Abdulaziz al Saud.

He was not involved in the 9/11 affair. 

It's been very convenient for a lot of people, myself included, to employ his high profile as a coverall Arab 'name' to turf about in connection to the attacks in New York that indeed had a large number of Saudi and Kuwaiti and Qatari people behind it - but not excluding some others who are in the European Petrodollar and American-Saudi Oil Cartel 'elite' circles.

The fact that his name appeared in a US government investigative report could relate to the idea that he has close financial relationships with the bin Laden Family via the Saudi bin Laden Construction Group - which has never specifically been implicated with the acts of terror in question; or any other ones for that matter.  

Prince Al Waleed - beautiful Marol bespoke shirt...

Al Waleed is half-Armenian.

...But he is extremely high-ranking as far as the genuine Saudi aristocracy goes because he is a grandson of ibn Saud himself.

For me, it stands as mildly amusing that the new White House, in collusion with the Saudi Crown Prince, Salman, together put the thumbscrews to Al Waleed to find out as much as they possibly could directly from someone who conceivably did know what actually had happened.

Now you know, you can thank me later or never at all, I don't mind, but don't you find it funny that the corporate media made all that fuss about waterboarding being used on a few people, some with very vague connections to bin Laden if at all - and now none of them are doing anything to stand up for poor old Al Waleed, who was taken to the Ritz-Carlton and interrogated.

The only contact that Al Waleed ever had with anyone even remotely associated with those who planned and carried out the attacks, is the Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi, who does have some knowledge but no more than as an investigative journalist himself who knows some of those involved by reputation and having interviewed Osama bin Laden at some stage.

Nobody pays me enough to say what I know and I have many times been given 'dire warnings' by Australian agents of A.S.I.O. who are essentially my ex-colleagues. I was never 'in' A.S.I.O., but I was in some other government place very close to their personnel and in fact, my direct boss in that department was the then middle-aged son of a previous head of A.S.I.O.

I come from another country entirely than Australia although I was born an Australian national on account of my mother who insisted on the arrangement from my birth.

As most of you know, my father's grand-aunt was Dame Gertrude Bell, who assisted ibn Saud become absolute monarch in Saudi Arabia.

I certainly do know who did the thing. ...Wasn't 'the Jews,' anyway. Nor really 'the Zionists' depending on what you mean by that term.

The man who owns this didn't do 9/11, now did he?!

The fact though, that Salman - who is very close to Trump and his people - agreed to pursue this plan about Al Waleed, tells you that neither of the two really know for sure enough about what happened on 9/11. ...And now, it turns out (much as I personally already knew and believed) that Al Waleed knows very little as well, if anything at all.

All that these identities with money in the Gulf who may have been giving funds to various religious groups in the past, really know, is that a lot of people hate or resent Israel. They have absolutely no clue about who did 9/11 nor actually, why.

And neither do you... ...actually know why. You might think you know (EG 'promoting conflict in order to sell arms'), but you would be wrong.

The world is not necessarily a safer place today than it was a while back but at least the shuffle board is kilted in the direction that I would want it to be, in order for ordinary people to be at less risk. There is a kind of a 'fire blanket' being put down now by Donald Trump and his people and those friendly to him around the world and that's a good thing.

But you can also see in the recent bullshit Skripal poisoning narrative that those on the losing side of the political equation are quite prepared to go to some lengths to gain back some ground.

John Bolton too, is not the villain that people paint him out to be - his reason for being in the White House is that he can keep his mouth shut and he is a patriot who can carry out instructions. He is not quite the war hawk everyone makes him out to be, so long as there is a governing plan that makes sense towards achieving aims without actually making war. I think his actions if he wildly disagreed with this White House, would be to walk away rather than con them into something. I don't think he or anyone could 'con' them, frankly. This is a very good team.

Clearly, Steve Bannon's shift had to do with his ownership of Cambridge Analytica, not any falling out with Donald Trump.

The media is 'all over the place' these days with what is really going on, and maybe only someone like Lee Stranahan has a solid enough grasp on basic facts to do with the Trump team and the entire Mueller/Russia nonsense to give you any sound insights.