A Short Word on Bustani

RT news broadcast an interview with the inaugural Director General of the OPCW (Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons), Jose Bustani, in which Mr. Bustani made a comment on the latest US National Security Advisor-designate.

Now I am quite sure that what Jose Bustani said is completely valid. And, he basically said that John Bolton was not someone you can 'have a dialogue' with - I guess that means he is one-sided and presents people with a fait accompli position.

Chemical Weapons prohibition place in Europe...

John Bolton, if you examine his history carefully, has most certainly been an assertive and argumentative personality as far as diplomatic niceties have been concerned.

His advantage though, is that he is not as easily (mis)lead by various malicious factions inside of the Security Establishments and can 'hold the line' against these sorts when they try to pull a swifty over the President and the government generally.

He is on record as saying that the Clinton email 'hacking' was not a hacking but a deliberate data download and in all probability, even started out life as a 'false flag' affair. I mean he is ON RECORD as saying this.

And that's a good thing.

An extremely good thing. Because as National Security Adviser with this kind of view he is going to have enormous sway over what stance the White House will have on Robert Mueller... ...who may have been intrinsic in such a 'false flag.'

Jose Bustani is undoubtedly a good man and an honest man. And he may well be quite right about Bolton. But in my view the single biggest threat to global security today is people like Robert Mueller and the fact they have to be stood up to by people who can do the job. 

Al Waleed

I guess it's time for me to tell you all the truth about Prince Al Waleed bin Talal bin Abdulaziz al Saud.

He was not involved in the 9/11 affair. 

It's been very convenient for a lot of people, myself included, to employ his high profile as a coverall Arab 'name' to turf about in connection to the attacks in New York that indeed had a large number of Saudi and Kuwaiti and Qatari people behind it - but not excluding some others who are in the European Petrodollar and American-Saudi Oil Cartel 'elite' circles.

The fact that his name appeared in a US government investigative report could relate to the idea that he has close financial relationships with the bin Laden Family via the Saudi bin Laden Construction Group - which has never specifically been implicated with the acts of terror in question; or any other ones for that matter.  

Prince Al Waleed - beautiful Marol bespoke shirt...

Al Waleed is half-Armenian.

...But he is extremely high-ranking as far as the genuine Saudi aristocracy goes because he is a grandson of ibn Saud himself.

For me, it stands as mildly amusing that the new White House, in collusion with the Saudi Crown Prince, Salman, together put the thumbscrews to Al Waleed to find out as much as they possibly could directly from someone who conceivably did know what actually had happened.

Now you know, you can thank me later or never at all, I don't mind, but don't you find it funny that the corporate media made all that fuss about waterboarding being used on a few people, some with very vague connections to bin Laden if at all - and now none of them are doing anything to stand up for poor old Al Waleed, who was taken to the Ritz-Carlton and interrogated.

The only contact that Al Waleed ever had with anyone even remotely associated with those who planned and carried out the attacks, is the Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi, who does have some knowledge but no more than as an investigative journalist himself who knows some of those involved by reputation and having interviewed Osama bin Laden at some stage.

Nobody pays me enough to say what I know and I have many times been given 'dire warnings' by Australian agents of A.S.I.O. who are essentially my ex-colleagues. I was never 'in' A.S.I.O., but I was in some other government place very close to their personnel and in fact, my direct boss in that department was the then middle-aged son of a previous head of A.S.I.O.

I come from another country entirely than Australia although I was born an Australian national on account of my mother who insisted on the arrangement from my birth.

As most of you know, my father's grand-aunt was Dame Gertrude Bell, who assisted ibn Saud become absolute monarch in Saudi Arabia.

I certainly do know who did the thing. ...Wasn't 'the Jews,' anyway. Nor really 'the Zionists' depending on what you mean by that term.

The man who owns this didn't do 9/11, now did he?!

The fact though, that Salman - who is very close to Trump and his people - agreed to pursue this plan about Al Waleed, tells you that neither of the two really know for sure enough about what happened on 9/11. ...And now, it turns out (much as I personally already knew and believed) that Al Waleed knows very little as well, if anything at all.

All that these identities with money in the Gulf who may have been giving funds to various religious groups in the past, really know, is that a lot of people hate or resent Israel. They have absolutely no clue about who did 9/11 nor actually, why.

And neither do you... ...actually know why. You might think you know (EG 'promoting conflict in order to sell arms'), but you would be wrong.

The world is not necessarily a safer place today than it was a while back but at least the shuffle board is kilted in the direction that I would want it to be, in order for ordinary people to be at less risk. There is a kind of a 'fire blanket' being put down now by Donald Trump and his people and those friendly to him around the world and that's a good thing.

But you can also see in the recent bullshit Skripal poisoning narrative that those on the losing side of the political equation are quite prepared to go to some lengths to gain back some ground.

John Bolton too, is not the villain that people paint him out to be - his reason for being in the White House is that he can keep his mouth shut and he is a patriot who can carry out instructions. He is not quite the war hawk everyone makes him out to be, so long as there is a governing plan that makes sense towards achieving aims without actually making war. I think his actions if he wildly disagreed with this White House, would be to walk away rather than con them into something. I don't think he or anyone could 'con' them, frankly. This is a very good team.

Clearly, Steve Bannon's shift had to do with his ownership of Cambridge Analytica, not any falling out with Donald Trump.

The media is 'all over the place' these days with what is really going on, and maybe only someone like Lee Stranahan has a solid enough grasp on basic facts to do with the Trump team and the entire Mueller/Russia nonsense to give you any sound insights.

From Here Where You Are - To There

Where are you, in your life?

Do you know?

Do you want to be... ...there.

Let me take you there.

...Guys, you know, because all of our ordinary worker-day audio-visual communications equipment generally accesses only the usual corporate media sources, we tend to see a lot of people telling us things that they want us all to believe is really 'where it's at.'

Alexander Downer 'overheard a conversation in a London pub...' For example.

Trust me, folks - there's going to be some things happening from around just about exactly 'now' onward, that are really going to hurt some people and not the ones who have been the victims up until now.

...There's a massive problem with this bullshit story about Russians having poisoned anyone in England. And the leader of the local Australian idiocracy has also fallen for the 'god must have stamped this' decision and now we must expel diplomats too along with 'our' powerful friends in the Borg.

And what's going to happen next is REALLY GOING TO HURT.

This is a cocktail bar at the top of the Shard in London,
and it's not the place Downer went to

Have I been wrong yet?

Hot Towel Massage (KGB 'old school' stuff)

I suppose one of the most galling things for the corporate media these days, is that the President of the Commonwealth of Independent States, is just so glossy mag-friendly:

From: Gettyimages - Vladimir Putin at a recent
Russian Institute Graduation

There's not a lot going on in the world of glamour, luxury, and frivolous spending these days. I'm not certain why, and I have been toying with the notion that maybe for a few years there has been this global elite with a vast gravy train of money driving the luxury lifestyle platforms and that suddenly they've all disappeared - also taking their gravy away, too.

Me personally I am being forced to revert to pretty ancient classical standbys of the luxury lifestyle ('lifestyle' is a compound noun, by the way, as my eleven year old autistic kid has recently pointed out to me) - the word itself being more than just the sum of its parts; after all, one could have a poverty-stricken 'style' of life, and no one would refer to it as a 'lifestyle' with quite the same glow of meaning!

It's at times like these that the value and worth of a damned good butler can be clearly demonstrated. Butlers are nothing if not mild forms of 'entertainment directors.' Private household staff are extreme rarities these days - but I know of at least one wealthy South African chappy who not only has a butler in his home, but a female one at that. Seriously!

I have yet to see this kind of extravagance proclaimed by those 'wealthy global elite in your face' *-holes who messed up everything in the world, of any meaning and substance, since around the time of the dolt Margaret Thatcher. Even the latest James Bond flick is being 'delayed' until maybe 2020 - the fact being of course, that it never made enough money on the last go-around to extract sufficient cash from that particular gravy train to fund the next iteration in a self-contained way. See what I mean? They messed stuff up. They chose to ignore the classical truth and reality, and started all of this nonsense about twisting what the Bond character was about, and twisting the story basis, and twisting everything save whatever suited their insane 'globalist agendas.'

Poljot 3133 Chronograph - 'President's Watch.'

You will still get the same stupid voices - 'oh but that's just your opinion, some people liked the new Bond, and it still made a lot of money.' No, nobody likes the 'new' Bond except fools and mentally defective knaves, and no, it didn't make any money. 'Published' movie revenue figures have been cons for years - they are based around forced pre-sale agreements with the distribution chains (cinema chains) who are all basically owned by the same coterie of families (mostly just one family - Kirby) and incestuous un-audited Swiss-registered trusts; they certainly don't represent audited actual ticket sales numbers at the Box Office.

The Bond franchise turned into rubbish produced by your typical nouveau riche non-entity with absolutely zero creativity and even less taste or class. If I see another movie wherein the idea of drama is portrayed by actors rushing about with pointless appalled looks on their faces as someone throws marbles into the air, or on the ground, or down the drain-pipers - whatever...

Drama - in case you were presently lacking in a truly plangent sense of it - is when an old expert barber cautiously unfolds a very hot towel, and gingerly places it entirely over your face, having first sprayed it with an exclusive and very privately-patronage'd properly, natural pernambuco-wood aged, and fermented, Bay Rum. 

Amber Rudd says not to jump to conclusions about who did the 'nerve gas' thing this week in England. It wasn't the Russians, that's for sure. What happened was so lacking in creativity and so old fashioned. It has all the hallmarks of the team that supplied us with Alexander Downer, and Christopher Steele. 

The Tragedy Of Today's Media

Yesterday I suggested to some people elsewhere, that I thought the corporate media, and consequently, much of the public, had now lost sight of the rabbit down the rabbit-hole.

At this point I could tell you 'a story' - one which is perfectly true and accurate in every detail, and you certainly would not believe it, but the telling of it would put David Icke to shame.

But I can't really tell you... Not that whole entire explicit story, anyway. I can maybe, fence around it a bit.

When you watch the basic media, you get the impression there are 'good guys' and there are 'bad guys.' And any specific person is targeted as 'a bad guy,' or in the obverse, 'unquestionably a good guy.'

Well, you realize of course, that 'the good guys' are not good for you or me; they are only in it for their own 'good.' And the bad guys are merely those against the first lot...

Thus as Carter Page told Chris Hayes, 'the propaganda deliberately sent out against me based on known false information...' And as often the case with Carter, the rest of the sentence consists of an eye-raise. But in any case, what you are indeed watching re 'the good guys' v. 'the bad guys' is propaganda, and only propaganda. And it is propaganda on behalf of 'the first guy;' (IE, the theoretical 'good guy/s').

Now the media has become so blinkered, so narrow-minded in its pressing of the propaganda it has been told to push, so tunnel-visioned and fixated, that it doesn't observe when others appear on the stage, as it were. And we have had 'others' appear on the stage... There is now a 'good guy,' a 'bad guy,' and a third guy.

The third guy is kind of like the White Rabbit in Alice in Wonderland. He's crucial to the story, in fact.

The tragedy of today's media is they cannot tell when their masters miscalculated badly, and dangerously - that is to say, resulting in risk that could be catastrophic for everyone.