Autism Project Donations:

Autism Project Donations here - https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=23MBUB4W8AL7E

Friday 21 October 2016

If You Thought You Knew Conspiracies...

Well I guess the interesting thing about the Wikileaks email stuff is that it basically confirms every single thing the 'conspiracy theorists' have been saying all along. 

It was not so much that there were a few 'wild theories' about the place, but there was a sustained and very firm belief voiced by a large number of people about the criminal corruption of the recent political 'holders' of the White House, and of a number of government agencies under them. It is difficult now to 'get around' the factual basis for these allegations.

But I must tell you all is not (it never is, is it) exactly as simple as we might initially think.
Afternoon tea...?

Yes of course it is crystal clear now that there has been large-scale unethical behaviour and compromising of ethics in senior government officials and elsewhere 'highly placed.' 

None of the revelations of the last few weeks ought to have surprised you - you've seen them all before albeit in the guise of mere 'conspiracy theory.'

The apparent 'fact' that an email - which is a written or at least printable document - provides 'evidence' has altered the media's discourse from mere conspiracy theory hinting, to direct and open challenges to various specific individuals over their precisely detailed errant behaviour.

And so, it seems that 'evidence' has moved things up a notch from just 'conspiracy theory' talk all the time whenever these opaque and possibly sinister matters are forced into the media's lap.

But I want to take things right up into the nose-bleed conspiracy nutjob stratas. I want to discuss the 'what if' aspect of the space alien references in the leaked emails. It's clear the media and even Wikileaks themselves have soft-peddled on some of the items, and the inwards emails to John Podesta are not exactly evidence - not those that we have seen so far - that the government really believes space aliens exist and come and visit us. What they show is that the government leadership group is open to extended talking about the matter; they give it some time when you would think they would have no time for it at all.

However I am going to tell you something now that no one else has ever discussed openly or in the public.
A host of the heavenly stars

There are certain aspects of the - let's call it 'talk' or chatter - in high government circles, about external to this planet, alien intelligent life, which proceeds from ideas and especially 'phrases' and terminology, that is taken for granted by all the 'obsessed' (if you want to still say its a conspiracy theory) when it comes to UFOs, and also by just plain ordinary government and military officials too.

For example, certain words we all think we know mean one thing - like 'asteroid' for one good instance of this - actually have more than one meaning. And, let's assume again, that there are space aliens, and that they have at some stage or that they sometimes still do, communicate with certain designated officials in government... As far as all of the 'conspiracy theories' go, space aliens are concerned about nuclear war, and in some other 'theories' they wish to dominate or exploit us. Sometimes we hear they give us technology we have to back-engineer in order to understand. 

But I can tell you of one subject of 'talk' about which you will probably be familiar - there certainly are military and NASA teams who concentrate on so-called NEO's that is, 'near to Earth objects' that might have some risk of hitting us and causing a lot of destruction. 

However I've got to tell you something about this that you will read or see or hear nowhere else: the word 'asteroid' does not actually mean what you think it means, that is, what we all commonly take for granted that it does mean.

'Asteroid' as a word has never formally been defined as a piece of rock or ice or other hard object that is floating around in space or on a path through space. The word actually means, in Greek: 'star-like.'


And what this means is this: if your were to read, let's say, in the Bible, that a star-like object will proceed from somewhere and land on the Earth creating 'disaster,' it might not mean an actual hard object... It more means 'star-like' as in those bright light bearers that descended over the shepherds out in the fields guarding their flocks by night. Star-like is a Greek phrase which means a being that is from the heavens and is very bright, or angelic.

And so, if you were to come across a current conspiracy theory to the effect that an asteroid is to fall into the water near Puerto Rico this month or so, causing havoc to Florida and the vicinity of - this might not mean an actual physical hard object falling to Earth. In those ancient writings we now say this is sort of an augury thing being talked about, albeit admittedly the Greeks and Persians also regularly personified these virtually astrological 'signs' and 'forces' and talked about them in terms of there being some intelligent force behind them, like a divine spirit, or sometimes they said, 'a god.'

Whichever way you choose to look at it though, I will guarantee you we are not talking about a hard physical piece of rock from space falling down into the atmosphere and crashing onto the Earth; which is what everyone thinks. 





If You Thought You Knew Conspiracies...

Well I guess the interesting thing about the Wikileaks email stuff is that it basically confirms every single thing the 'conspiracy theorists' have been saying all along. 

It was not so much that there were a few 'wild theories' about the place, but there was a sustained and very firm belief voiced by a large number of people about the criminal corruption of the recent political 'holders' of the White House, and of a number of government agencies under them. It is difficult now to 'get around' the factual basis for these allegations.

But I must tell you all is not (it never is, is it) exactly as simple as we might initially think.
Afternoon tea...?

Yes of course it is crystal clear now that there has been large-scale unethical behaviour and compromising of ethics in senior government officials and elsewhere 'highly placed.' 

None of the revelations of the last few weeks ought to have surprised you - you've seen them all before albeit in the guise of mere 'conspiracy theory.'

The apparent 'fact' that an email - which is a written or at least printable document - provides 'evidence' has altered the media's discourse from mere conspiracy theory hinting, to direct and open challenges to various specific individuals over their precisely detailed errant behaviour.

And so, it seems that 'evidence' has moved things up a notch from just 'conspiracy theory' talk all the time whenever these opaque and possibly sinister matters are forced into the media's lap.

But I want to take things right up into the nose-bleed conspiracy nutjob stratas. I want to discuss the 'what if' aspect of the space alien references in the leaked emails. It's clear the media and even Wikileaks themselves have soft-peddled on some of the items, and the inwards emails to John Podesta are not exactly evidence - not those that we have seen so far - that the government really believes space aliens exist and come and visit us. What they show is that the government leadership group is open to extended talking about the matter; they give it some time when you would think they would have no time for it at all.

However I am going to tell you something now that no one else has ever discussed openly or in the public.
A host of the heavenly stars

There are certain aspects of the - let's call it 'talk' or chatter - in high government circles, about external to this planet, alien intelligent life, which proceeds from ideas and especially 'phrases' and terminology, that is taken for granted by all the 'obsessed' (if you want to still say its a conspiracy theory) when it comes to UFOs, and also by just plain ordinary government and military officials too.

For example, certain words we all think we know mean one thing - like 'asteroid' for one good instance of this - actually have more than one meaning. And, let's assume again, that there are space aliens, and that they have at some stage or that they sometimes still do, communicate with certain designated officials in government... As far as all of the 'conspiracy theories' go, space aliens are concerned about nuclear war, and in some other 'theories' they wish to dominate or exploit us. Sometimes we hear they give us technology we have to back-engineer in order to understand. 

But I can tell you of one subject of 'talk' about which you will probably be familiar - there certainly are military and NASA teams who concentrate of so-called NEO's that is, 'near to Earth objects' that might have some risk of hitting us and causing a lot of destruction. 

However I've got to tell you something about this that you will read or see or hear nowhere else: the word 'asteroid' does not actually mean what you think it means, that is, what we all commonly take for granted that it does mean.

'Asteroid' has never formally been defined as a piece of rock or ice or other hard object that is floating around in space or on a path through space. The word actually means, in Greek 'star-like.'


And what this means is this: if your were to read, let's say, in the Bible, that a star-like object will proceed from somewhere and land on the Earth creating 'disaster,' it might not mean an actual hard object... It more means 'star-like' as in those bright light bearers that descended over the shepherds out in the fields guarding their flocks by night. Star-like is a Greek phrase which means a being that is from the heavens and is very bright, or angelic.

And so, if you were to come across a current conspiracy theory to the effect that an asteroid is to fall into the water near Puerto Rico this month or so, causing havoc to Florida and the vicinity of - this might not mean an actual physical hard object falling to Earth. In those ancient writings we now say this is sort of an augury thing being talked about, albeit admittedly the Greeks and Persians also regularly personified these virtually astrological 'signs' and 'forces' and talked about them in terms of there being some intelligent force behind them, like a divine spirit, or sometimes they said, 'a god.'

Whichever way you choose to look at it though, I will guarantee you we are not talking about a hard physical piece of rock from space falling down into the atmosphere and crashing onto the Earth; which is what everyone thinks. 





Monday 17 October 2016

Chinese Government Arrests Crown Casino People

Ah well. What did I tell you?

Poor old James Packer, eh?

Never called me, that's for sure. I could have told him to watch his back.

Not so funny now, though, James, is it...

I have been completely forthright and even, explicit, right here in this very Blogspot.

Anyone who doesn't know what I'm talking about hasn't been reading here over the last, oh at least year or more!

Enough of this sad affair, though. It doesn't really interest me any longer except to say that if this is the way the Australian Security Intelligence Services 'protects' its own country's top ranked, wealthiest of citizens, then they can all go and get f*.

Did they not know? Did they not care? I dunno. I don't care anymore. It's not my problem.

It was of interest to me once when these clowns tried to steal some stuff from me once upon a time. I recall what happened next but I can't say. Anyway it all ended up 'being finalized' in New Zealand.

The house of cards all came tumbling down, as it were. 

Soon, better, prettier things to talk about. 

Friday 7 October 2016

The Dark Arts

Someone was encouraging me to read some of the 'official' journals of modern psychology yesterday - which I did - and I think I was supposed to be 'amazed' or something by what I was reading.  

Now you people ought to regard yourselves as 'awfully' lucky because I sometimes say things here - not knowing what any of you are like, or even look like - that I would never say to the vast majority of people who ever talk to me face-to-face.

I have had the personal experience, of having worked inside one of Australia's largest Merchant Banks during an era in which there was every man and his dog from everywhere, including especially Academia, coming in and talking about money for research and projects. And in this environment, occasionally, very occasionally, you would encounter one person, or one thing or project, that would have the attention of some important people.
It's just a trainer, it's the new Boeing T-X,
but it is a beauty.

Now in a 'field' of defense contractor representatives whose names were of this unlikely nature of things: 'Willard something The Third!' and 'Jake de-something very fancy,' and 'Tiborg von something else again...' in this environment, when a guy got 'picked up,' by the 'industry,' trust me, strange things happened and there really were black limos in the dead of a very dark night and so on.

One such individual had the surname 'Prevenslik' and much more than that I'll not say but he literally disappeared 'without a trace' other than to confirm to friends that he had been 'given' a full laboratory facility on an island somewhere in the Mediterranean, AND an incredible sum of money. And no one ever heard from him ever again. There was another instance of a guy who was given a blank cheque by FOUR large international accountancy firms joining together over him - but that was all to do with a, um, I can't say, but it was a financial matter rather than any kind of technology.

One of the things that arises in my own experience as carrying with it a red flag, is anything to do with AIDS research or Third World programs for AIDS drugs or testing. Clinton Foundation? Anyone? Anyone? 'Nuff said.

Prevenslik had nothing to do with this but right now, I can tell you that one of the real 'hot' areas of development at Harvard has to do with micro-drones.

I am a great supporter of this (micro-drone) technology and I don't worry about loss of privacy and all of this.
No comment!

You know, if you are a clever person, and can exercise your own imagination and run a few scenarios by yourself, you might realize that sometimes - well in fact all the time - it is better that certain inventions or innovations and developments do not get out into the public so that they can be used with the element of real surprise about them; used against violent criminals, murderers, even serial killers and the like, and they can save a lot of lives of unfortunate people who might otherwise be at serious risk and danger without the availability of the equipment in question.

There is a Japanese inventor who has a complete digital holographic process in a full functioning stage. And this is another of the sorts of people who you will tend to hear little about for a long time while the Military and other official types exploit what he has.

For me though, it is still of much more interest to know or try and understand what is going on in the brains and minds of the truly aberrant who yet manage to get under the guard of people and escape detection while they practice their insane ideologies unimpeded by anyone.

If you could tell, and I mean scientifically say for sure without conjecture, from signs at a distance, about the insanity of an individual, it would be an important understanding; we are not there yet, though, I don't believe.

Being insane or being too easily manipulated are sometimes two sides of the same coin, though.

I don't want to have to rely on advanced and even somewhat risky technology or weapons to stop a person after they have gone out of control. I want to get out of the way before, or be able to stop them and destabilize them enough to stop their plans before they do a lot of damage.

I am interested in technology, but I am more interested in psychology.




Friday 30 September 2016

The Art of Darkness

There are only two books I have ever deliberately thrown away, or burned - in my whole life, and recently I have (think I may have...!) relented about one of them:

I eventually had to cast out 'The Call of Cthulhu' because every time I even just merely thought of the word Cthulhu, weird things started to happen. 
Our young detective hero is driving around in this,
going up to Gothic mansions to pick up his girl...

And being a gambler with all of the superstitions that are attendant on this occupation, I simply had to do something severe.

And the other 'book' of course, was the Generous Quran; it isn't 'holy, as you know by now of course, the words used by Muslims themselves to describe the work as: 'Al Quran Ul Kareem' - which means 'generous,' not 'holy.' There is simply nothing holy about it.

It - the Quran - is a mixed up piece of disjointed gibberish full of repetitive phrases and some of the most crude language you can imagine, it's just that when various 'translators' (such as the disaffected Anglican cleric Marmaduke Pickthall) render it into English, you have all of these diacritics turn up that were not there in any original document, and the subsequent version heavily laden with parentheses explaining in the translator's own words, what is meant by whatever the actual verse is.

The Quran stays in my 'bin it' category.

Cthulhu however, I have always considered, contained some nice interesting turns of phrase early on, almost straight detective-fiction style writing, before the writer became affected by whatever 'bad trip' he was on later in the work. There is a certain modern-ish - at least if you consider the Twenties, modern - wallowing in gleaming black paintwork and chrome and steel, and glorying in new silk and satin dresses by the damsels... This is all before the Cult of the other-dimensional 'Cthulhu' starts to be visited upon the innocents.

As far as honest literary history goes, we have to say that the Alien Predator creature in the Schwarzenegger/Glover series, is very much based on Lovecraft's Cthulhu.

I feel there is a gap in the market though, so-to-speak, in today's world of literature (although, hardly, can 'the Quran' in any sense be termed literature; fiction yes, literature no).
They drink some Silesian-owned Cognac, whereupon,
not long afterwards, inter-dimensional monsters
beset them!

The kind of atmospheric literature about which I am thinking, thrives on mystery of some kind - and for me, how much of the world even survives these days is a very big mystery to me. Although, truth be told, I am not very interested in solving that mystery. I am by no means a sort of altruistic type of person by nature, I have to say. Hillary Clinton has nothing on me as far as cold distant responses to the pain and suffering of people at large goes.

And that is because to a large extent I view the pain and suffering of people on the whole as a logical inevitability. Whereas what worries me about Cthulhul is the sheer appeal to outright chaos that H. P. Lovecraft made in his books. The monster is from chaos, carries out chaos, and its followers (acolytes, as Lovecraft called them) possess some inner and personal and deep commitment to chaos - for whatever reason I do not know. Lovecraft's ideas unfortunately, may have some basis in facts about humankind though...

'Chaos' for humans in actual human society, results from the deliberate misapplication or failure to allow words to have their actual meanings. The Quran is one of the most categorical examples of this: for instance, the word 'ransom' is used in the original text, and Muslims fundamentally have no idea of what this word means. The word 'soul' is used, because it is lifted straight from an earlier Hebrew source, and in today's renderings, the phrase in which it ought to be used is this: 'if someone kills a person, then it would be like they killed the whole world...' The actual verse says, 'For We decreed to the Children of Israel, that whosoever seeks to destroy a soul from among them, it would be like unto as though they had been responsible for murdering the whole world of Mankind.' 

In the Quran, Allah ransoms Isaac with a mighty sacrifice (which is not detailed) when earlier it appeared that Abraham was about to slaughter his son. Who does Allah give ransom to?

Who is so powerful, that he can extract ransom from Allah?

This we will never know from Muslims because they are an absurdity.

I personally feel however, that Allah is paying ransom to...

CTHULHU!