Interlude

It's a million degrees and I'm in the city again, fixing up some deal from a Swiss client with the Perth Mint.

The Gold Price is running hard, and the person's IBAN (International Bank Account Number) is not 'clicking' the list of numbers the Mint holds that it is allowed to deal with - except it is UBS and they deal with a large number of those clients.

It's hot out there.

That's not Kidman but it's like
Kidman (kinda was).

I have some time to 'waste' and I don't want to leave the place right now and lo and behold, right in front of me is the Palace Cinema Complex, in the heart of the city and that place is air-conditioned to the max.

I'm going in there!

What's on? Now that's going to be a problem because I seriously detest modern movies and I've already seen the only one doing the rounds that is any good as far as I'm concerned (Widow Clicquot).

Jeeezus. The only thing on is this Kidman 'click bait-y' thing - Babygirl.

I've read no reviews and I'm not going to.

So anyway I'm going to watch it now and I can walk out if I can't stand it (which is what I'm expecting).

Movie starts and I've gone through my 'medium' Fanta or whatever thing it is that it is supposed to be, from the actual soda fountain.

The start seems cringe-y to me. The opening 'orgasm' scene looks faked (but don't make a hasty judgment here; I'll tell you why in a minute as you 'get' what this is about).

Frankly although I don't think most other people are going to say this about it but the start scenes are slightly unpleasant to me - the characters are not empathetic. At least I don't think they are.

I notice this kid actor Esther Rose McGregor, right away out of the blocks is a quality item; delivery outstanding, a small sentence and steals everything from big name actors Banderas and Kidman.

There's one scene where the 
guy sends Kidman a glass
of milk - and she drinks it.
Yeah, you wouldn't want to
be drinking a 'glass of milk'
that I sent anyone!
LOL

This is a very difficult movie, very hard to direct, very difficult to perform by the actors - I realize they are doing a stellar job though...

This is a severely flawed movie but only in the perfectly characteristic way that all modern modern movies are flawed: they need to get you over the 'propositional' gap - the disbelief that would attend a real-life situation but which you must suspend because they want to tell you a story and they have no time to tell it. (Nobody has any time these days).

One of the lines in the movie that occurs twice is when Kidman's character tells this 'intern' that he has 'seven minutes' of the ten scheduled because she has no time.

She is playing the character that is the CEO I think of some huge and tremendously successful robotic warehouse technology corporation whose whole objective is to 'liberate people using AI and robots in order to give people back time.'

LOL

Was a good line and a bright idea.

Unlike in past days, movies now are about sex and 'relationships' (usually problematic ones) whereas previously they were about murders and spying and only incidentally with the 'spice' of adult themes thrown in over the meat and potatoes.

And unlike Widow Clicquot, this remains a 'difficult' movie virtually all the way through although I begin to realize this is being carried by the staff (the actors) and Kidman should win awards for this and so should the kid.

The male protagonist who is not the husband (the husband is played by Banderas) is not good, but he is authentic in the portrayal of a 'contemporary' concept about some kind of post-modernista 'dominant.' As far as the directing and the intent of the movie, maybe it's better that he is not at all a sympathetic character; the movie might not make as much sense if he were.

I know this is feeling to me like a re-make of in part Demi Moore and Michael Douglas/Donald Sutherland's 'Disclosure' and something else that I can't place - but the ending lines are definitely things I have heard before. But it does have a contemporary twist that has to do with lots of nuanced things.

What ze actual f*! Oo iz zis guy Bill Smith?
I'm sure ah dohn no 'im...
U noh 'im, Bill?
You see 'im somewhere before
maybe?
'e look a bit familiar to me.

It's a much better movie than I was expecting.

In these pages here we have been talking about solutions not dysfunction without resolution.

You can't say I have no sense of humor because hey, I went to see this flick, and I really did enjoy (in a sense I enjoyed it...) it.

The basic theme is that (some, certainly not the husband played by Banderas) humans are tied to their deep core physical feelings, their senses - you could say it is a very sensual move, that is true enough - and there is no spirituality that can resolve anything after that.

An interesting line in the film delivered by Kidman is: 'you're confusing morality and ambition.'

I find that an interesting thought.

It's juvenile but it's still a thing that people 'act out' on.

And then there is a sort of movie-land resolution and it quite works and then all of a sudden, when taken as a whole, the whole thing works and some ideas revisited at the end dove-tail back to the start and you realize things were not exactly, necessarily as they seemed when you saw the opening scenes.

The husband is a successful stage director and producer and he was working on a season of the Ibsen play 'Hedda Gabler' and there you also have this dark(-er, slightly darker than it already is!) theme of suicide and what could lead people to do that.

Nobody commits suicide in the movie.

Everyone's quite rich and everyone's very successful and of course they seem to have time to f* up their lives but really, at the same time they have no mindset that can handle what is being presented to the viewer as this 'deep, dark. innate,' psychology thing that (some) humans have that make them interesting to all of us lurid voyeurs.

Nobody 'flies away on the 
nightflight' in this movie...

LOL

I didn't think Kidman was capable of doing this role at this time -, I did think she was maybe a bit 'past it' but then, that is not actually the character (the one I was expecting) she is playing here - she is openly playing an older person; a much older person. McGregor tells her (she is the daughter) that she 'looks like Grandma' and Kidman's character never blinks at it, not one time.

There are a few 'modernistic' gender aspects present (with the daughter) but the movie is not preachy in any way at all. Which is different to what you get everywhere now.

It's a good movie, it's a very valid set of ideas in there and people deserve to get awards for this - I think it would have been very difficult for people to act in and the director and producer to make properly. But they do it.

It resolves nothing of course. 

We resolve stuff in here.

...I leave the cinema, it's still a million degrees outside in broad daylight, and so hot that I am not even hungry.

The reality is Kidman is getting richer but she is not getting any younger.

I am getting younger.

LOL

Fact.

It's partly a time-dilation thing but then at some point...

You know the rest of the story or at least by now you should do.

I'm not going away anywhere yet though so don't worry. There is a lot more 'delivery' to achieve here. As well as a lot more monkey business. 

      

 

 

Grappling With What To Say...

Or, how fast to say it, that is.

Anyway.

So...

So.

I stuck this page up on FaceBook see. And lo and behold it got swamped with responses.

And now I'm stuck with having to maybe cut a whole long saga short and go to the end stage before traveling through the middle!

LOL

Ah well. That's not new for us here, is it.

[First I wanna mention this. I went out for a walk last night, past the local MG Dealership,  and the yard had about fifty new cars there. Right in the middle of the showroom behind the big glass windows, was this old, but extremely well-renovated MG TC. It was a work of art. All the rest of the stuff was complete rubbish; utterly worthless. In human life, there is something that originates something, and then after that it descends into nonsense and rubbish, taken there by idiots who have no clue]. 

Anyway, the thing is this - Ammon Hillman wants to tell everybody that the Christian story is about drugs, and sex -, I guess he would want to say.

And he tells everyone there is this thing called the 'Porphurious' and so on, and how this was used by the earlier oracular traditions.

So what. Unless he tells us what it is and how to do it.

I mean, no Tik Tok videos - no God/god, no ET's, no UAP's no nuthin'.

It's the modern world, come on.

God appears on the Mountain to Moses - Moses must take selfies with God, right. Otherwise no can do, sorry Moses; you can keep your 'Ten Commandments.'

Suddenly, we want to go from this
world, to some other, 'better' place.
And that's because we have no clue
about what is going on.
For sure there are 'other places'
but they are also interwoven with 'here'
places.

...So I'm going to tell you about the 'Secret' Book of the Three Sovereigns. This is a great Taoist Classic that I am entitled to speak about on account of having been inducted into the tradition and a particular 'lineage' (aka Sect) in China some time ago. And I stuck the pic of that onto the FB page. And literally I got a couple of spam or I don't know what, 'queries' anyway that maybe I was using someone else's photos!

LOL

Ah no. That's truly me and yeah, I am the guy they patterned 'Men Who Stare At Goats' on. Oh but yes indeed-y.

I have never not mentioned here that I trained at the same place that that movie production's technical consultant, Guy Savelli (US Marines Unarmed Combat trainer), trained at - only I was there a lot earlier than he was.

What I really want to do is engage with some hard-core modern Christians though, because it seems to me they are up in the air about what is 'demonic' practice and so on, and what is trad values stuff.

They are supposed to be very well conversant with sacred 'Chrism' and yet, I suspect absolutely none of them at all, knows or realizes that this is a Shaolin and a Taoism thing - it's called 'Bai Shang' in those systems and it means a scared oil made using Myrrh.

Now, although everyone wants to say the 'Three Wise Men' from the East... ...were Arabs and Muslims (anachronism but then, Muslims say everyone was a Muslim originally, even Abraham who met with THREE Divine people at the Oaks of Mamre) -. Or Egyptians at minimum.

This color is called 'Orange
Cinnabar.' Real Cinnabar is a toxic
substance of course, so when you
read the typical Chinese 'occult' or 
'secret' books, I'm not sure whether
you should treat them seriously, frankly.
Because a lot them carry
on about 'Cinnabar.'

Shaolin monks have been being sent out from the Temples (and who knows when these even started - just because three major ones described in history books were burned down does not mean there were not already more than three previously) since forever.

The Shaolin Temples were repositories of medical and physiology knowledge just as much as anything else.

Here is the thing though:

It is the Western system that has the best understanding about why the rituals and practices as described in various sacred texts, work.

Take for example the Christian idea - 'God' is this 'Total Divinity,' see. And an aspect of it, that is existentially present all the time, is a Spirit which pervades absolutely everywhere all at once.

Now.

Now... You and I are going about our profane (worldly) affairs, and yet this Divine Invisible Mind is still around and cognizant but not engaging.

How do you change the setting of what you are doing, to engage with the Utterly Superior God thing?

That is the point of ritual.

That is what it is all about.

You are inviting the Divine Being to engage with you personally, when you change your mode away from the merely profane.

And this does not mean you do not suddenly need anymore to be a material living person.

It just means you have temporarily stepped away from the mundane and the profane, into the different, realms.

Now here is where what you are hearing from me is a quantum step away from what you read about in books made by people with no actual direct lineage practical knowledge.

In undertaking the rituals
to do with 'relationships'
you must use a peach-colored
silk blindfold.

Whereas in books they say 'there are three worlds - the Underworld, the Human World, and the Heavenly World;' I say, the Underworld simply means the Past, the Human World means your moving present and linear time experience of the 'Now,' and the Heavenly World literally means 'the Future.' 

And although one might incorrectly presume 'the Future' therefore means an as yet non-existent reality albeit a potential one, in fact it is an orientation.

All those who live in the Heavenly Realms, are always creating, making new, building on the past, being innovative, listening to the Present, and choosing between various potential options.

That is all.

'Hell' or the Underworld, means being stuck in the dysfunctional Past.

The Present is just your mortal life now - which is capable of taking you right back to the Past again, or leading you into the Forever Future.

When inducted people practice the secret Taoist or Wu Shu rituals, they are blindfolded, and the colors of the silks used, are there to communicate to the Hidden Realm beings, what your intention is on that occasion, and also what your status as far as being a protected being, is.

So because of having to rush a little on the other page, I will explaining to them there about one of the three things people are most commonly interested in, namely, their relationships.

This requires the Orange or Orange-and-Gold silk scarf used as a blindfold.

I have not told them yet that there is a process whereby it becomes possible to literally see, in these other places (although I mentioned it here) - but this thing is related to what Hillman is always going on about but does not really know practically-speaking about or how to do.

Dior - Chinoiserie.

I hope you are noticing that nothing you have been being told here recently, is not actual practical step instruction that you can yourself do, and achieve direct experiential results from.

And believe me, I can give you line-for-line categorically modern science for why these things work. 

And I can tie them back to statements made in ancient holy texts that you are well aware about but have never been explained fully concerning.

All of you who have been financially involved here in the past will get accurate and complete details about the process that 100% no question at all, will literally have you, like, switching some previously seeming hidden faculty on and you will see, into another place; into other places.

The very first time you 'make it' you will jump back with a shock about how real it all is.

Right now I am only dickering around a bit in order to sync up with what I am doing on the FB page. 

Being Rich In Today's World

This is not easy!

Yesterday night, I walked around the whole city, from East at the river ferry place, to all the way across town to the end of the North (basically food/Chinatown/ethnic-y) section...

It has been very hot here, and it was quite warm in the evening yesterday.

What did I find?

I ended up just having a coffee.
Not here and it wasn't in the
morning anyway.
But it was pretty much like this.

Queues outside of every single place that sold sit-down food and drink. Literally was queues.

Tonight - which is significantly cooler - there is hardly anyone around anywhere. Fair enough it is Sunday night here right now and people are I guess thinking about the beginning of the working week ahead.

But that is not entirely it. I have noticed this before: when it is ridiculously hot, people go out into very uncomfortable situations, and mill around in noisy crowds and end up some place packed to the gills, where the noisy crowd is compressed in an enclosed space, even if it is air-conditioned so what; and the tables are full and the service cannot be as optimal as it might be, put it that way.

The signs that the mass of the population - and this applies anywhere and everywhere in the world today - is inclined to change habits if you presume they envisage things could be made better through change, do not exist.

Those signs of an inclination to think ahead, and to formulate better ways - never existed.

Cycles of change have happened as the result of the introduction of new technologies, and the population-wide economic distribution effects of large-scale deaths through plagues or war or both.

Human beings are not forward-looking proactive in terms of style of intellect.

Some individuals sometimes are, and these are deemed 'reformers' or eccentrics.

And so we make a mistake when we think of the great religious conceptions of the world that include in their picture, otherworldly beings - 'higher' beings, beings of greater fundamental intellect and certainly, of greater knowledge - and think that all humans simply because of the teachings, are able to quickly access such realms or to hold the kinds of thinking that meet the 'normal' standard of those putative higher minds.

The fact is, even the Bible New Testament clearly says - 'you shall seek me but where I go now you cannot follow (yet)...'

Cannot follow.

Fleming patterned Bond on
this guy and Hoagy Carmichael.

And that was not a statement made simply to presage the actual death, because of the phrase 'you shall seek me.' 

And then the rest of that is about 'in my Father's House there are many mansions,' and 'I go to prepare a place for you' and so on. So it was not an initial statement about death.

So how do we 'not make the mistake' - of thinking that anyone can easily understand or fit into the places and among the people of very advanced societies?

First we have to know what the 'mind of the wonderful' means.

It's a pointless exercise meeting wonderful people if we do not appreciate that they possess 'a mind of the wonderful;' they are wonderful.

All of these images across the popular internet and sponsored in any case by the general media anyway - depicting these weird-looking, gaunt-faced, huge bug-eyed creatures theorized as being what ET Aliens look like - are just so much utter rubbish.

The only difference between an ordinary human being and some being from a very highly advanced culture and civilization somewhere else, exists in the way of thinking that that other being has compared to what a typical Earth-bound human has and exhibits.

To meet with them on terms that are realistic for both sides (considering that both claim 'intelligence'), we must enter into the presence of the mind of the wonderful; we must enter into a field of which we seldom experience here.

This one is a bit too exotic for Fleming
to impute to Bond, but then, it hadn't been
created at that time anyway! 
It's pretty good however.

We must become part of that field.

We cannot keep looking at things the way ordinary mortal - and restricted - human beings all do.

But what is the difference? How can we make the jump across?

We must possess a mind of the wonderful. Our own mind must be wonderful in every way itself - or at least start to be like that.

Human beings tend to lose things. They lose their mothers, fathers, sisters, brothers, pets, possessions, money, position, status (according to the rest of standard society).

You are all about to get completely shocked with what you will soon learn, and I am not delaying that approach to the knowledge.

...A smart person will already begin to be able to, as they say, stick two-and-two together with what I will show you next (now). I won't show it all but I will point to the beginning thereof.

What Ammon does not know about...

Dr Ammon Hillman thinks the people in the early Christian cult stuck something over their eyelids that enabled them to see; just like the original Cult of Medea was able to at some unknown time in history but certainly more than a thousand years prior to Jesus of Nazareth.

And why are natural things capable of opening doors to an unnatural realm?

Because Genesis does not start like this - 'In the Beginning;' but like this in actuality: 'THE Beginning CONTAINS ALL THINGS Good as well as Evil and from beginnings to endings, the Alpha through to the Omega and everything in between.' 

What the heck is this?
I think it's a Duesenberg.
That's more Sayers than Fleming...

You, you -, contain the capacity to have a mind of the wonderful. It's already within you.

Things that you pick up on the seashore...

Have purposes undreamed of by the common.

We make light of death because we never make light of the Force and Power of certain other things. ...Things which the common think they can have, or that they do have, and most of them believe they will have, on account of money.

LOL

Okay, Got The Go-Ahead

'In the world, you will have tribulation...'

So what other world is there though?

We know this one, we live in this one, we see this one every day.

Is there another place; some other different place? Or is it another world - like this one but different. Or maybe there are many different other worlds.

Where are they intending to go with all of this talk about UAP's and weird stuff that is claimed to be linked to those - like psionic communication?

I don't know what they are thinking.

And, I'm not all that interested.

A reason that I have been suggesting - and quite hard - that people do some of their own 'ground-work' so to speak, and test their own ability to access the deep mind you could call it, or try and uncover hidden faculties that allow a person to see beyond the narrow ranges of sensory inputs that our normal consciousnesses are used to, is that if you find the correct path; the correct tools and mechanisms that allow for such faculties to be found and used, the results are intimidating.

Believe me you are not prepared for what you will see.

And the single biggest reason that these faculties are hidden from people, is that they have not yet developed to the stage where they can handle the 'life consequences,' let's just call it.

The context for the original statement above here, is the difference between a mortal framework and some other framework.

People die and that solves a lot of their social issues!

The separation between the Gaza people and the HAMAS people - and the Jews - is so enormous that the situation literally is un-resolvable in terms of their ever 'getting together.'

With the best wills in the world (see, in the world; aka this world of mortality and 'ideology' and 'I am better/smarter/more morally correct than you') all the nations of the world cannot solve this situation, and neither will be able, any of their leaders. 

I have gotten the 'okay' to point you to some extravagantly amazing things, some knowledge that has been around but is not well-exposed for reasons of certain events in ancient history. And these things will give you total and complete as well as easy access to a faculty that changes everything.

Literally your life will never be the same again. It cannot remain the way it has been.

Not once you have seen.

And the issues and demands and noisy accusations and assertions by all of those people that you now are able to view as being on one side or the other - will look stupid. No not just stupid but beyond stupid.

And yet you will see that all of these people's lives end in the same outcome: their own personal death.

Ideologically, the completely non-factually asserted position held is that then, later, beyond death, a 'judgement' is made by some source and the cause of war and strife is thus justified (in that judgment; although why it is, no one is able to produce a single sensible reason for saying).

Why do I say 'no sensible reason.' 

Because the proposition is always that a Perfectly Powerful Supernatural Entity, needs to 'judge' you but then, it apparently never had the ability to teach you while you were alive, what to do or how to think good things and have good ways of handling others - and certainly, it was not able to control all the human beings and their behavior; which resulted in continuous tribulations between peoples.

So it's obvious this 'Being' cannot have been All-Powerful and it certainly is not All-Good either since it persists in allowing gross human degradation and violence and horror and complete evil.

And yet, billions upon billions of the walking mortal (meaning the walking but inevitably dead) stubbornly hold onto this lunacy.

They literally do it to their deaths.

What we must comprehend then (as thinkers without bias) that it is our status, our own position - the mortal human one - as being the thing that requires more focus and not imputing some non-factual attribution of intent to an unseen 'Entity' that we cannot really, 'examine;' in order to resolve the question of Theodicy.

We cannot ask questions of God because He cannot or does not, answer us back. Those politicians that claim to talk to God, well no one believes them!

We can ask questions of ourselves however, as ordinary mortal beings with whatever senses and sensibilities that we have and that are very evident to us.

Well of course we can pose questions out to the Unknown, and address those questions to a putative 'God.' And books give accounts of various distant past times when 'God' answered and all heard or saw. And none of us can 'see' or 'hear' ourselves today other than second and fifth-hand via old texts.

The context of the original statement is very clear. It moves the human from mortality to something else.

And the 'something else' is the thing that requires thinking about because this would certainly completely upturn the way people have relationships with each other.

What will fall into your hands (meaning into your knowledge) shortly, will make your life richer, deeper, more profound, than you have ever experienced or ever thought possible outside of fairy tales.

I am not decrying religion - as Ammon Hillman for example, does do.

It's not complicated, you know.
It's just hidden in plain
sight is all.
...Simple, but good.

What I am saying is that there is religion and faith, and then there is delivery.

Where you should have gotten up to, by following the systems suggested, is that you will fall asleep with your eyes, albeit with eyelids closed, 'reaching out as if to see' and seeing mostly just dark space - the backs of your eyelids, or just blackness and some odd moving shapes maybe or some sprinkles of what 'could be' lights but that might just as easily be optical memory elements of the brain.

But the constant overthinking should be not as prominent as with normal people who try to 'see' with their eyes shut.

Good. From there, we start.

Over the next one or two posts we will slip away into quite different themes, and this is not to distract or divert but to place things back onto the ground -, whereas then at some point the whole thing will switch up to the completely esoteric except it will underscore what is back 'on the ground' that much more. Do not dismiss this world.

The Short-Sightedness...

So like you, I have been noticing the commentary videos and even some 'legit' journalism stuff following the Jake Barber interview, and it is starting to feature titles/captioning like 'the government psionics teams...'

And then if you go into any of the items all you will get is some indistinct commentary about there being literally government and/or military units designated as formal 'psionic operators' and that they 'are able to call up' UAP's.

Well so what if you do though? That is, if someone 'calls up' some UAP activity via psionic means - then what?

Just remember the 'Oriental' stuff
because it will hold some meaning,
later; and no one else will be able
to 'get it.'
 

Has it not occurred to anyone at all making these videos and writings these 'stories' in the media that there is an intrinsic logical consequence of saying that such a thing is genuinely factually repeatable.

It means that - and let's say that they are those beings - super-advanced ET Aliens are capable of reading people's minds.

And what that actually means is apparently something that has totally eluded anyone's thinking thus far.

Let's say I or, really, some 'up there' advanced species can deep read someone's mind. 

And they are able to scan lots of minds and then of course sort people together...

I don't think people have grasped what this means yet.

I have never used the word 'psionic' in here. Not previously anyway and not even now when it comes to how to make two-way Contact.

What I have said is that the usual human consciousness operates on a fairly limited parallel range and narrow-channeled set of sensory inputs and even these are run on low levels of dynamic neural energy, so to speak.

And then what I suggested was that we need to enhance the levels at which we are 'thinking' and increase if at all possible, the synchronous linking of senses and that this then gives some scope to be able to make ourselves more clearly 'heard' and more able to be communicated with.

That is not 'psionic.' That is ordinary neural activity but with better contiguous-linking to our own internal memory cells and neural networks, thereby leading to richer conceptions and more fluid and facilitous accessing of semantical connections.

I can't do this.
Well...
Haven't tried since I was
ten or eleven.

You can, using standard human technology, see the levels of brain energy (literally measure it) and also where the focus of neural activity is in the brain.

This is not something 'woo woo.' This is basic emf scanning and recording.

It's not different to radio transmitting and receiving.

But it is the consequence of such a thing being handled by a counter-party that is, let's call it, not-human but incredibly advanced and intelligent, that is the significant aspect; not whether such a thing is possible. It is possible, what is uncertain is whether or not there are any such things as ET Aliens out there listening to anyone down here!

But here we have a bunch of people saying, or reporting, that they are doing it, albeit on this ridiculously simple-minded basis of having 'someone' wave back at them.

So what now, the conversation goes something like this does it:

'Hey guys...' Waves at them.

They wave back.

Now what.

'Are you going to come down here or are you just going to wave at us and then go away and then, nothing -?'

LOL

I mean seriously, what madness is all of this?

They get themselves into a lather over something, and they flood the internet and even some mainstream media places with all kinds of speculative nonsense - all on the strength of real outright foolishness and simplistic semaphore flag-waving that does not even come up to the standard of old days' Boy Scouts manuals...

Just for you, Bill.
But I think it's a fake pic.
Looks kinda real though.

They are able to flood the internet - millions of views, literally is millions - and it's all utter brainless garbage beyond the first point that maybe someone signaled back on account that maybe someone here 'meditated' cute thoughts or whatever.

Now, it is a bit different when Barber and one or two others just skippingly mention that there are human co-pilots who come from some of these 'psionic teams' also are jointly piloting these craft with actual ET Aliens using the thoughts of their mind... Hey hey hey! Just a minute there.

What did you say??

Seriously, waaa?!

Man you just took one way big step away from just waving at someone 'up there' and being waved back to.

Man and then some fool literally said that a 'crashed' vehicle had been retrieved with human remains in there along with the dead Alien bodies.

No such thing, let me tell you.

No no. What is going on is that all of these people who are deliberately floating these stories - I mean the ones behind the front faces; the people actually driving the agenda - are fishing for responses from people they know are really in all of this.

And which is not any of them.

Like I said before, the uptake would be that here is this super super-dooper advanced species that is able to come across to here from 4.3 light years away, and then they crash, and then they are unable to retrieve anything themselves - because (as is the latest 'theory') apparently we have the strength in our radar systems that interferes with these craft.

What a lunatic story. Seriously.

This is more my style.
I mean the graffiti.
And the alleyway.

You know what I think?

I think there is an 'us' and there is a 'them' and 'us' is me and perhaps you and definitely some 'friends,' and 'them' is the idiots who have absolutely zero genuine access and no clue about what is going on.

And there is a problem with the 'them' because for some unaccountable reason that I couldn't possibly even guess at, they are not taken into the confidence of the smart people from faraway places with more brains than these guys down here, and in fact, they may be quite disliked by the actual intelligent ET species.

I wonder why.

Meanwhile, it's the military see, the military that has all these Special Access Programs and they have all the answers and keep it all to themselves, and are not going to tell you anything (because they know stuff though, right). Always the bejeezus-great military. LOL 

Over coming weeks and months now this year, I will be sharing with you exact precise ways you can communicate and be communicated back to - and it will shock you out of your wits (only temporarily) when you find you can do it and it happens for you. But then, if you just go back to what I said at the start, you should have under your belt by then, a few books of Plato, a little bit of Hesiod, some fascinating nonsense from Ammon Hillman and his clan of silly people but that reveals some ancient important things nonetheless, if you are able to filter these into your brain and discard the stupid click-bait slant of his and his little tribe - if you have all of that solid background, you will make formal actual Contact and see and hear and everything and everything else that goes with it.

And you will more than likely absolutely not, pepper the internet with loud noise about any of it.

Because at that moment you will very fully realize, there is an 'us' and a 'them.'

And one of the two has power.

And that's the problem then.

Just such simple things...

It doesn't matter if you work out how photons function, or where they all come from in the Cosmic physics equation, or that there is a matrix of plastic-like invisible something, spread out everywhere and that electrons and photons do not actually move but transfer information in systematic ways throughout that matrix which then becomes what we call our apprehended reality...

This situation is not a permanent dichotomy.

It only lasts as long as there is an equivalency of sentient balance - but that always changes when one group is able to extend its sensory reach and richness, while the other becomes stultified and is only a simulacrum of infinite intellect.

This is all just a systems question; a question of a system growing, reaching its Gauss Peak and from there rotating into the high-side (RHS) change to whatever the design path objective was aimed at in the first place based on the original system inputs.

'Humanity' is (just) a systems equation.

Some things go forward and some die off.

Nothing important goes missing though, trust that. Trust it because it is a Law of Physics, as you know.

...As far as fun stuff is concerned, are there really human co-pilots who go around blasting things and people with laser cannon?

Did someone say 'Wu-Dang Taoist dancers?'