Saving Lives

Those of you who have been funding the Autism employment project ought to know that you are saving lives.

I know it says in various sacred texts that 'only God in heaven knows what you give in secret' but in this case I also know and you should at minimum know that these things have vastly more value than what people tend to believe.

Last week I read in a national newspaper a whole article about a fund with a lot of money that was managed professionally and it appeared to be handling what is called 'philanthropy' by the very wealthy and is a practice that has pages and pages dedicated to the kind of thing in places like Forbes Magazine.

What the Moulin Rouge was actually like
in the olden days.

I don't know about those things and I have never seen those levels of funds for actual on-the-ground socially worthwhile and meaningful causes anywhere.

There are more homeless people living in the streets today than I have ever seen before.

And there is more money channeled to 'philanthropy' and our national government here is complaining about going over-budget on its bi-partisan 'national disability insurance scheme.'

I've never seen any of that money and I know personally of no one who has.

It's in the multiple billions. Allegedly.

I know that clinically diagnosed anxiety among the public is on the rise and the so-called mental health rates among all ages are not going down either.

But I don't want these pages to descend into time-wasting discussions about charities or causes or the general poverty of the planet.

I want to talk about the fact that very likely almost no one here has actually acquired a copy of 'Hassan' by Flecker and read it to the end and still people wonder why no ET Aliens turn up and show themselves...

You got Hassan, right?
I mean you did get it.
Right??

Ah nah, I don't really want to say that - I already know and expect what people are likely to do and what they have the time to do.

We can't all just drop what we are doing in the moment and go get some all-fired old book just because Calvin says.

(Who is 'Calvin?' Calvin J. Bear is this guy who has been around a long time on a private investment forum started by some serious professionals most of whom are in the services 'somewhere').

I mean put it this way too - how much would the Wall Street Journal pay for access to a person who has actually been on one of these 'recovery' missions??

LOL

You know which ones.

Those ones. Of which there are said to have been nine already.

LOLOLZZZ

Hey no point calling me! I don't know any such persons. And besides, they would all be signed into a 100-year heavy-weight agreement for which there are only jail provisions for breaking the covenants of secrecy and confidentiality. So, no, I don't know such people.

Yeah, and?
What sort of people actually live in there?
Do they all get on with each other?
Are there servants?
What about slaves, are there some of those?
Who cleans the joint?

What I do know about though, is that there are mansions in Oregon and Aspen and so on worth tens and tens of millions and I happen to know one or two of the folk who own them and gee, they are boring boring people when it comes down to it.

I mean most of them are quite nice in the basic way of how people come across socially and none of them is stupid exactly.

None of those people know that I am to be found here.

They would not be shocked with what I have been saying (about them).

One is an inheritor of one of the original shareholdings of a major oil discovery in the Timor Sea. The actual historical fact of it all is though, that those people never did actually extract any commercial oil there and the whole thing was fought over by the government of Indonesia and Philips Oil and then subsequently the independent Timor government backed by Portugal.

This gentleman's entire wealth came from floating the proposition on the Australian and the London exchanges during the era of the 'wealthiest entrepreneur in Australia' back then, Robert Holmes a' Court and in the end it was demonstrated that he never actually owned any rock-solid rights to anything in the Timor Gulf at all and meanwhile... ...he died so it was never shown that he was a complete fraud all along.

During his day no one could say a word against Holmes a' Court because he owned a media empire and all the politicians had fallen in love with his seemingly aristocratic Rhodesian style. Enough said. ...All you Freemasons out there.

Is this a truly wealthy person,
do you think?
What is 'truly wealthy?'
...Are they an interesting person?

Actually, another of his famous crazy investments was that he had bought a huge number of heritage properties in France and the truth of that was that legally - he wasn't allowed to sell any of them!! LOL

So, what he had and what he owned and what was real and legitimately a commercial asset that could be sold in an open market - was moot.

I tell you all of these things in order to explain why 1. you are not barred from being in one of these incredibly beautiful white elephants in Aspen, and 2. you do not need to be intimidated by those who 'own' them.

Those people are nobodies.

The people who are somebodies are the ones that actually gave to a real physical manifest cause to do with social endeavors and the human beings that received the benefits and welcomed those and were grateful are all real and important people. All of them; both sides of the equation.

Who's to know or say whether some day some currently unknown person with Autism suddenly turns up on the public scene as the world's greatest concert violinist?

...I know you want to be in that mansion in Aspen.

But that is where the 'friends' come in.

And they are our friends and they are your friends too. They can take you anywhere. They can 'disappear' you and bring you back in one piece too. And you will not be able to tell anyone what you saw.

On that private almost secret, finance forum I was talking about a few paragraphs above, one person recently remarked that there were rumors that MH370 was 'disappeared' by some top secret amazing technology of the Pentagon... I've seen those short video clips too. 

LOL

The Pentagon has no such 'top secret' technology.

It's not secret, but it is
nice technology.

They can make out they have it all they want as far as I'm concerned.

They can do whatever they want to do all the way to the bitter end.

Because there soon will be such an end.

Meanwhile though, we want to just go find ourselves in one of those mansions, right? With some friends, and some very good wine, and absolutely no one else who should be left behind in the world far below - or outside, as it were.

You are already on the inside.

Can you tell?

I mean you think about it: you got Hassan nobody else got it; you got to read about the funny long-fingered people, no one else did; you got to be told that there is a gooey, oxygenated substance inside those little white Tic Tacs no one else knows about that; and you got told that blue light lasers (LED ones, that's all) shone into halite salt crystals placed over your heart area increase the T-cells in your blood and prevents disease and gives you tons of energy, nobody else got told about that.

Now though, Hassan. Back to Hassan. What did we learn from that?

For lust of being where the common folk should not be, we take the Golden Road to the mansion in Aspen...

For me the one question is who will want to go with me - will I go alone, or do I want others to be there?

I started out more or less alone. I found some fellow travelers along the way though.

Most serious-minded people want love above all else, but they want the love of the right beings:

It's ALL Secret

'Large' as in 'owes a lot of money' property and real estate companies are collapsing everywhere across the world right now - in Sydney a huge one run by Jean Nassif just hit the wall, and in Europe the really gigantic Signa went broke. 

Signa 'owns' flagship London City real estate like Selfridges Department Store among a constellation of large irresponsible holdings.

We're going conservative -
no more talk of ET Aliens...

All of this is on the 'basis' - so the general media outlets say - that because they had borrowed when money was free, now that the interest rates are a minuscule 5/6 % they naturally have to go broke!

Money is never free.

If you thought that funding capital with 'free' borrowed money would permit you to just spend and spend and spend on ever more outrageous and commercially stoopid projects, then it would seem that two other essential aspects to business were eluding your mind all along:

1. the projects should (must!) generate a net positive cash-flow;

2. you have to pay back the money that you borrowed and what was the thinking on that? That money was always going to be 'free' and that selling capital assets would be able to fund/re-fund all initial liquid funds proportions of capital - which was borrowed in the first place?

Which insane banker lent to this kind of lunatic nonsense?

Well - all of them did!

Now you've got two other problems...

Firstly of course, you have the corporate collapses.

And secondly you have what must be technically insolvent banks.

The real problem to the claptrap being spouted in all of the corporate media everywhere right now is that this is the 'end of the interest rate tightening cycle' (there is no such thing as an 'interest rate cycle'), and that inflation is coming down and so interest rates must be - will be - cut by central banks.

Okay I changed my mind.
...What you don't know - but
you now do 'cuz I just told you:
there are these private parties around the
place, where all the rich
men and women
dress in expensive
Fendi modernized Star Trek
gear.
This pic above is the absolute
latest Fendi fashion, and to even
buy it you have to be on a 
'special customer list.'

The idea that because corporate holders of real estate all went broke necessarily therefore the real estate prices themselves must fall is sheer nonsense - banks cannot afford to write back the values of the assets they just stole from the collapsed enterprises or they too will also go broke.

After all they never had any real money to lend in the first place; they took it from those central banks who got it from you the taxpayer and the insane lunatic legal codes and weirdo fake 'democracy' constitutions and whatever else has allowed them to even exist.

Here, right here in this place we do buy silver and some gold.

And why do we do that?

Or, better question - how can we do that?

Well because we have a net positive cash flow that's how come we can.

It's modest but it is not meaninglessly so, and it certainly is sufficient to permit me or Bill Smith to go down the Terrace a few blocks and head into the Perth Mint and buy things there with our registered account/s.

The amount of economy-wide risk in the world right now is absolutely stupendously huge - and there is no way that an expression of that risk equates to 5% benchmark government bond rates in major Western economies.

If you had a lot of money to invest for gain, then in the words of Elon, at 5%: 'Go * *.'

So.

Okay. You're a central bank and my god you are so important. You want to offer to the market of serious professional investors some of your rubbish debt at 5%.

And seriously, you have convinced the whole GD world that real estate is a great investment, and money was able to be lent/borrowed over the last twenty-odd years for nothing, and it can all go into real estate development, and that this is the 'end of the tightening cycle' and everything is fine and everything will be great moving forward.

Yeah yeah no problem.

Fifty million listen to the Fed and all of the TV-land commentators every day, every month, every year.

No one, practically-speaking, comes here and listens.

Every day on
the Golden Road...

And that is why the Golden Road starts here and it even ends here as well.

This is the Golden Road and you are on it.

Jesus did not quite come back already yesterday.

...But the Wise Maidens sure as heck are here.

And they have the oil for their lamps.

Am I right?

No one else has any oil for their lamps - and things have never been darker.

I know some of you look at the recent jumps in commodity gold, and say 'Gee if only.' And Calvin said not to.

Calvin s-a-i-d stay here.

Here, we don't self-indulge in two per cent 'leaps' or get emotional about fragile rises, or seeming rises.

We get upwards of twenty per cent annually and take massive multiples in capital gains and if we can, we avoid taxes too!

I mean we're not supposed to, right. I get that. You can get fined and even jailed if you do that intentionally or you do it on some grand scale.

And we would never do that.

At least not intentionally so that we could be found out.

It's all secret - all - the Golden Road, the ET Aliens, the private parties, the way out...

You just happened to find your way here. What will happen next?

The GOLDEN Road

What kind of road was it?

A golden one.

And that is not a hint about the gold commodity price - which of course does seem to be rising a touch.

The trouble with the gold price in recent times is that it is in fact quite volatile for anyone who is actually messing around with leveraged positions. Don't do it, is my suggestion.

Buy gold?

The golden stairs, the golden walls,
the golden chandeliers...

For sure you can.

Slowly, with physical delivery, and over a long time.

The 'road to Samarkand,' though, is golden.

What is this 'Samarkand' and why was it regarded as a worthwhile place to take a long journey to?

Well, your history books will tell you nothing.

However 'Roshana' means from the stars, or an actual star. And the stars that fell from the sky and landed leaving mounds of stones (Classical Greek: marak/s) - which same word is the actual basis for 'San Marco Piazza' in Venice (because that 'Marco' has nothing to do with 'Saint Mark' as most people believe, although it has been syncretised with the modern Christian religion) are thought of as sacred to the God Hermes. ...'Sa'Marak'Qand.'

There is much more to the ancient traditional folklore involved here than the superficial stories that are still vaguely intact from the past. But one clue is that Roshana (the wife of Alexander the Great) dedicated herself to the God Athena.

The whole entire basis of Muhammad's account about meeting with a being who appeared at first like a star and then either held a bow and arrow, or was - who stood and communicated - a shot bow's length away from him -, comes from this specific ancient cultural folklore about beings who flew like arrows through the night sky (aka 'Sogdians:' those who shoot arrows) and were stars or from stars.

Personalized, etched wine glass.

To travel to Samarkand means to travel to an unearthly place, which had direct connections even to the stars. 

After all, Hassan and his friends already had all the valuable silk and confectionery and spices; which they were bringing with them to trade - so they were not going to Samarkand for those things. And sure, maybe there was money to be had there but then, so was there in Baghdad where they were leaving from.

So why make the long and hazardous journey to Samarkand?

Was the ruler there better or wiser than the Caliph of Baghdad?

Could have been...

But the story is essentially about human life and human death, and not the difference merely between earthly rulers.

As we move into the next phase of heightened mainstream media reportage about what the CIA apparently 'knows' and also what it organizes and coordinates for outside-of-official-government military equipment and weapons technology manufacturers to do with the suggested finding of nine separate ET Alien craft including two that are fully intact - and the re-engineering of or the back-engineering from, all of this 'recovered' hardware - let me just re-state what we have been saying here for five years or longer:

None of this, what the media is talking about, is true at all.

Rotations in the aerial silks...
Round and round and round.
While you hear the music blasting 
from the track below. 

The truth is more esoteric, more exotic, more sinister, and more 'conspiracy thinking' aligned than anything about what the CIA has or does with supposed 'recovered technology.' 

If you, for example, were a person who had found your way to Nevada, out to the desert there, and were actually beginning to engage and very modestly, communicate with ET Aliens - the secret cadres within government who monitor these things would hunt you down and they would stop what you were doing and sometimes that would be very aggressively done.

They tend not to do it with the women who go out there, and the crazy post-modern 'Hippies,' because they can control those and even manipulate them and certainly, they can insert 'plants' into the groups and subvert their thinking quite easily.

Plenty of fact-based details emerge into the public arena but these are also brutally messed with eventually and end up as part of a very mixed-up 'story' in the public's mind.

The biggest mistake anyone can ever make with all of this is to think that 'the government' (that is to say, those who are active there in all of this, whether the OGA or the CIA), is also 'searching for answers' like anyone else might be doing.

The government (IE 'the government') knows 100% what this is all about.

They already have access to a lot of super-advanced technology and do not need any from ET Aliens that are trying to reach out to us.

...But if you keep your eyes and ears open, and just be more skeptical of the official propaganda and consider things more using your own logic instead - you will probably not miss the key moments and the key understandings that are required in order to make sense of any of it and then see through the trajectory of events as they unfold.

You would be surprised how much ET Aliens are interested in beer, as much as they are in golden roads, and how they place themselves (they are here) in altogether mundane places so that people are mostly all none the wiser.

I've already said too much.

The other big mistake is to do with trying to have all and sundry 'know' about stuff.

People generally who think they have stumbled onto some 'mighty big secret,' just want to tell the whole world.

Except the world that you are in does not consist of all the same kinds of mindsets within the people here.

Do not be naive.

You can 'get out' in the 'dead of night -,' more or less alone.

Here We Go - Giggle Giggle

You know of course that I was not going to say what this all-fired thing is right here and now, but heck I've changed my mind.

But first - all the jokes that only good (and not to mention also rich!) Muslims will understand.

This text is an authentic hadith, brother! And it is graded hassan - which means good, strong, sound.

Also means 'handsome,' by the way, which is why so many Arab kids are named 'Hassan.'

How can you not know it??

Vaguely, very vaguely - a clue for you.
No, no. Not 'The Travels of Marco Polo...'

What? You do not know it?!

Astaghfirullah!

Now when you get it, you have to read it properly.

Start at the beginning, and follow the thing properly all the way through; it is not long at all.

Each page, why each line, is a fruit from Heaven.

Unless you read this and see the whole thing, you will not be able to follow along when we start the journey into another world, another place entirely from here.

You will otherwise get lost in the maze of this world.

And be side-tracked.

Who can compose such a writing as this?

For who can compose even just one verse like unto it, whether they be Jinn or Man...

So can you, by the way, guess what the text is? 

It is written in the form of a play.

I suppose, well not 'I suppose,' it is essentially true - that only those who are able to observe those things of the past, maybe of their own personal past, that are not let's say, ideal, not the way they would choose to act and react: they are the ones who can accommodate 'a heavenly realm.'

Others simply cannot.

Where the wealthy go...

We are, as humans - as Plato considered - half way between the mortal and the divine. What keeps people back in the enclosure of mortality is that they cannot see.

It is completely easy to see rich things, to see a wealthy lifestyle, to admire nice things and to desire them. These are material things. 

But so too are the inner emotions and understandings also material things - they are true and they are real, if unseen by the fundamental optical vision of the human eyes.

One cannot enter into the realms of heaven without an intimate knowledge and understanding of moral right and wrong - and this can only come from experience in the dynamic mortal realm of existence.

Which is why some religious thinkers posit some intermediate place, a place not Hellish at all, but not yet truly Heaven as such either... This is where the souls of the deceased innocent children go, in this hypothesis.

The religious concept (and which is also a primary psychological one described by Jung and also Freud in his own way) of 'forgiveness' is highly complex when examined closely. One cannot simply just choose to abandon the ways that do harm, and then by the same token too, say that one has 'forgiven' others who do wrong to you.

The shawl of the traveler...

And this is because we all have bio-chemical and neuro-chemical processes going on that demand that we feel in certain ways!

We did not and do not intend to install such processes inside of us; they are already there.

We can no more choose to not feel them than fly to the moon on a magical camel.

The essential problem also involves the human ego - what it really is. 

Is it intrinsically my own consciousness of self?

But what if I had a different composition of those bio-chemical process structures...? Would 'I' then still nonetheless be 'me, myself?'

The logical thing is that neither can I expect to be free of wrong-doing myself, nor am I able to pretend that I have 'forgiven' any others, when I know those others have not changed in their own internal construction; especially of the bio-chemistry and neural responses of which they were made up as a particular identifiable 'self.'

In the human world I have choice, but I do not have supreme power.

There is a great and a totally commonplace mistake that most if not all Christians mistake in this matter, when they talk about 'forgiveness.'

They misread what the words in the sacred scriptures are.

They read it as 'forgive others that you may be forgiven.'

It doesn't say that.

It says, 'Forgive the transgressions of others.' Not forgive what people are. People who are evil cannot be forgiven; they are evil. God hates evil, and He hates the evil (people, diabolic, diabolic beings).

You can forgive what a person does, but not what a person is.

And because people are not finished beings, they must be left behind if they cannot change - you have to also leave behind the things of this world, in order to see and to be with the things of the next world.

The text is 'Hassan' by James Elroy Flecker.

The Story of Hassan of Baghdad and how he came to make the Golden Journey to Samarkand...

The power of the forgiveness of sins is a power endowed by the application of logic.

Logic comes from Truth and God is Truth.

You, if you possess logic, have the power to forgive yourself, what you have done. You are though, a person that understands the difference between Good and Evil - this, what you are, does not need to be forgiven. If you possess logic, you possess a power of God. Thus you indeed are somewhere between the mortal, and the divine; in part. 

Next, you must go to the next stage...

Jews, generally speaking, do not have a concept of 'sins.' Each year they 'sweep the mischief they have done under a carpet' (Yom Kippur) so that they can just go ahead and do it all again next year, because at the end of the year, they have Yom Kippur again.

Muslims do have some sort of concept of bad deeds and evil acts, but these are presented (in the religion, not in their own families) in the Koranic context that says that Allah decides who does what, where and when. So it's a bit fatalistic.

Star Trek is the only ideology that maintains a discourse along the lines that beings, typically human and/or humanoid beings, can change and become something better than they had been.

Vulcans all abandoned emotions because they saw these as the sources of evil.

The humans of Star Trek apparently, somehow viewed virtually free energy as the condition for a post-scarcity economy and thus, it was that scarcity was the source of Evil in societies; to the humans, of the Star Trek Universe.

And yet text-book Abrahamic Faiths do not think that scarcity is the source of Evil: in fact quite the opposite, if anything. 

After all, it was a tree that was there, in the Garden, and from its fruit came a desire whose fulfillment held evil consequences for people. 

Frankly, seeing the World, you would have to say that this tree was very very abundant indeed, its fruit not scarce at all.

The lust for money is the root of the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil.

But lust itself is not wrong.

Humans who are 'of the right stuff,' lust for the heavens and for a better life and a better world.

Might As Well Explain...

Okay, so I was hoping that, yes sure, we can make some money, no problem...

But I wanted to do it slowly and steadily and not shake anything around or make any waves at all.

I'm going to try and stick to that plan as much as possible but it really does look at this stage that we will be making a whole lot of money and maybe sooner than I had originally expected.

Really what I wanted to do was fly so far under the radar that not too much in the way of government-scrutinized anything would be required, at all.

That is probably not going to be so desirable in any case now.

To cut a long story short, and you all know this side of it anyway - there is far greater funding available when you have government-registered official status as some venture that can be a deductible expense to others.

So. Enough said on that already. Won't talk about it any more until something completely concrete actually happens. Will it...?

At this stage the option for it is on the table with strong government arena support in the mix.

So that's all good as far as it goes. I guess.

And to be fair, in the end it's all about the kids who benefit.

Can I keep - will I be able to keep the mainspring of everything completely hidden, and well-hidden?

Yep.

Silver Digital Dirhams will not feature anywhere and no one needs to know that anyone around this place has ever been doing anything other than just commenting - making commentary - about the stuff that the US Congress is talking about anyway.

LOL

But I've made no secret about spelling out clearly where and what and who, actual real ET Aliens are - if, someone ever came up with say, a million bucks so that I could go hide quickly afterwards!

We have plenty of natural pink salt 
down here in Australia.
And it's pinker than Himalayan pink salt!

Well, looks like those kinds of numbers are gathering and if they ever become a hard reality in a directly-controlled account somewhere that I can personally move around nimbly, then I will try and give out the information anyway, although my concept always was to hand it on to much younger people so that they would not be pushed around by the ruthless and the malicious when it comes to the ordinary human 'man-in-the-street' who gets manipulated and exploited viciously.

And to be able to get the attention of the junior set, you have to market the truth - you cannot just hand it to them; they've never seen it, and won't be able to assess or understand it and appreciate what it is and how to use it.

There we were, just happily skipping along, doing as we pleased, talking nonsense and some not so nonsensical things now and then, very occasionally...

Humans are half way between Life and Death.

I am by no means any kind of standard human you have ever encountered.

The smart thing to do is to move toward Life, and steer away from Death. Death is a real thing. 

People all think they know what Life is. They have no clue.

What is this - some kind of
Italian ice cream thing going on here?

They imagine that 'saving someone's life on the battlefield' or in the hospital or somewhere is something to do with Life.

Humans are living creatures but they are not fully Alive.

You can't 'save' the life of someone who is not even yet fully Alive. A consciousness is subsisting within a material and dynamic moving frame with biological processes in train and electro-chemical systems powered-up and neurology making cause-and-effect memories to be stored in cells. That is the status of a human being.

All that you are doing is -, and what you are being intent on 'saving' is - simply the maintaining of a certain status quo of an object not a person in truth and in the full dimensions of that being's potential complete reality.

In other words yes you can maintain a state of effective robotic activity and even then only up to point, beyond that point of course, is what you term 'death.'

And even that is mis-describing things: what you are describing is the break-down of some materially connected processes in a self-contained 'sarca.'

The tuning and the harmonics of the electro-neurological circuitry is what is truly intelligibly  'Alive.'

The future is the future...

Richard Dawkins and deGrasse Tyson are continuously intent on saying that there is no evidence for either 'God' or para-natural things like ET Aliens and so on.

But for people who claim to be scientists, and who must at least subscribe to mathematics more than just in name only, you would have thought - for such people they are indulging in extreme wild walks in probability and gambling when they then next 'conclude,' for instance, that they will not go to Hell when they 'die.' Because, as they assume -  'Hell does not exist' and so on in the long list of their presumptions.

It is an intellectual mistake to simply and rashly assume that they will not go to a literal Hell - when all the religious teachings say that they will.

Because they certainly will do.

And they are taking extreme gambler's odds against it in stubbornly insisting on not facing the essential moral intelligibility of the problem:

It's intelligibly sensible to make an investigation first, before merely assuming such things when the consequences are so great in the negative.

You'll be driving this, Bill.

These are the same people, by the way, who would jump at the notion that with the aid of a neural implant, one will be able to transfer one's consciousness out of a dying body...

See the problem is not really if or whether or not one is able to do that - the real problem is where do you wish to send your 'consciousness' if that even were a thing, and a real thing...

I am going to teach you all - and this is from literally advanced, super-advanced ET Alien knowledge and understandings - what this key, in fact essential quality of desirable environment, is and is all about.

It's about the desirability of the environment; not the putative practicability from some strained contemporary woke-y 'science' perspective of it, is.

If you promise to actually go and read this thing I will name in while here - it's not something written recently; it's from something written in the late-Nineteenth century.

Do you promise?

Because I will certainly ask questions afterwards.

And if absolutely no one reflects back the 'harmonics' then -, why it will be pointless going on too much further about that subject.