To The Most Corrupt Places

The most corrupt people go to the most corrupt places.

Anyway...

In the ancient Vedas, in all the skandhas, and basically as the underlying philosophical dichotomy (as explained in the Bhagavata) of all the living beings in the Universe, is the concept that the majority of beings consist of those who are under the belief that it is possible to annihilate Shiva in particular, and the Trimurti as a whole group thereafter, by literally denying Shiva's existence, and by continuously taking and then exerting absolute control over all material things, all matter - which they see as 'without mind' and thus able to be subjugated.

This is how I remember Malay women,
when I was growing up. Naturally,
it wasn't always exactly like this,
because they did more things than 
play around in water all day long.

This dichotomy is understood as a war which is going on. And which war never fully ended with the Mahabharata.

So these texts describe 'demons' but the concept of 'demons' in the Vedas is much more complex and detailed than the social-cultural and folkloric concept about the word, in the West.

'Demon' is not always just a Titanic monster as it is depicted in Jewish traditional literature, and it is not even the case that Titans, Reptilians and/or preternatural snake-beings (the Nagas), are all 'demonic,' but only that kind are -, who are 'a-suras.'

And this means those who totally abstain from wine.

'A -' not (having), 'sura,' alcoholic nectar.

'Nectar' you can get from 'Surya;' the Sun.

And I previously told you how.

The greatest of the Asuras was Shalva.

He possessed a massive space ship which was like a whole city. However there was only darkness inside there, with some kind of glow from crystals and jewels. But otherwise there was no light, and absolutely no entry points for sunlight - or starlight, or moonlight. In other words no light from natural objects which gave light from their existential dynamic 'heat' - because, in fact light from crystals is on account of entrapped electrons that are released. The 'dynamic potential action state' of the crystals - if they were acquired from Nature and not synthesized artificially - is pressure and the entrapment, containment, and 'holding up' of electron flow potential.

All ethnic Malay people, men as 
well as women, wore a batik or 
gold or silver threaded batik
form of folded headgear called 
'tanjak' or more generally
'tengkolok.' Some of the women
wore only combs in their hair and 
no headgear at all.

A lot of people in the 'New Age Guru' business have recently been asserting that 'grey ET Aliens' are demonic, malevolent, and bad/evil.

They are not, however, and it is easy enough for someone to ascertain whether anything masquerading quite possibly as an ET Alien, is not in fact a demonic thing: they will not imbibe alcohol. 

And this is attested to as well, in Timothy in the New Testament - 'for such (people) forbid sex and enjoin abstinence from certain foods (and drink), giving heed to seducing spirits and doctrines of demons.' 

Some modern Vedic scholars suggest that 'Asura' means a being who resides in a different dimension, in the 'aether', on account of the fact that 'sura' can also mean 'the essential spirit' or the 'ethereal' - but that is not correct because directly stated in the Vedas themselves, is the idea that 'Surya' is partly also composed of 'aether' which is because it is itself ('svayam' - means 'itself' or 'himself' or even 'yourself') also existing in the ethereal 'world' at the same time that it is here with us in our plane of material existence.

'Asura' means a being, a person, an entity, who does not imbibe alcohol. And this is also why you will find atheistic materialists all claiming to be 'realistic' and rationalistic thinkers, and never 'out of their minds' - and they are the very first to point the finger at anyone who disagrees with any pronouncements they make, as 'crazy' or 'out of their mind;' whereas they themselves never are that. ...Are they.

Even when they use medications, it is because of 'mental health' and not because they are refusing to face reality...

I have never ever seen women
attired like this in Malaya when I was 
growing up. This is Arabic, Middle-Eastern
desert clothing. It is not Tropical
attire at all.
When I was growing up, and you 
went to rice fields where there were
bullocks plowing, often these were run
by Malay women (and women and men both planted
and cut rice) - and they were bare from the 
waist up. I mean to say, entirely. And that
was also the case in the fishing villages. Not always
because it was not always hot and humid,
there were Monsoons too.

Or if they ever indeed 'use drugs' it is because they are doing so 'recreationally.'

Their strategy to control material things and the material Universe, and to compete with each other and never to share anything unconditionally, is demonic, and leads to their acquiring a lot of material wealth and material power.

Material wealth itself is not evil or bad, but it is in fact the only form of viable external 'negotiating' power that an atheist may have. And that is why they must have it.

Often a person who is exploring the psychology of economics on this planet, will experience and also witness incredible 'controls' being imposed on the flows of all dynamic forms of energy. And this is necessary to make a 'franchise' out of atheistic materialism. You can imagine, for example, if you were to be able to simply -, 'toil not, neither spin' and yet somehow have wealth and make money.

Yet you will see, albeit not so commonly, and you have to look for them very hard to discern them - certain types of people who live materially quite successful lives without serving the obtaining system of strict atheistic materialism. These people often, if not almost always in fact, disguise their lives - and they make themselves look like one thing, whereas they are something else entirely.

But then again they only disguise their lives from the foolish and the ignorant. They are, if anything, out there, hidden in plain sight.

I wonder if I can find one or two examples, in coming days, perhaps identities who are not with us today, because we don't want people heading off and annoying anyone now, do we?

Anyway, for now, back to the normal trance programming and away from all of those tears:

  

The Mystery Of Human Life

Somewhere, in one of the great texts of the great thinkers and philosophers, maybe even in something said by Saint Anthony (this is the ascetic monk of Egypt, 3rd century AD) although I doubt as much him, necessarily - there is, fully explained to us, in a way that we can easily understand, the mystery of the human being, and of his life.

Interestingly in the case of this very wealthy guy, Anthony, who gave away all of his material riches to live in the desert or something ('off grid,' I suppose), he once questioned God about how come some people die at great age, and some good people very young, some are very wealthy, and some hard-working honest people remain not wealthy their whole lives... ...to which he received a reply from an angelic source, more or less delivering the pronouncement of God to Anthony: 'Ah shut up and mind your own business. Don't worry about them, just worry about your own affairs.'

What do people learn, over their lives?
Wendy Matthews - Canadian-Australia
singer, songwriter.

Even though he, Anthony, did go off on his own largely, although people came to visit him and inquire of him his thoughts on various matters - even though he went 'off grid,' let's face it, there was no television in those days, and he was often visited by demons and 'phantoms of women.' Well, I must say though, this is pretty cool, Anthony. It's all very well you sending them all away all the time but come on man, they must have kept you slightly entertained to some extent. 

I mean I know just actual real women can be damn annoying sometimes and you would like to just 'send them away' too but you can't... 'Phantom women' who were trying to tempt Anthony away from his austerities would have had to have been 'not so outright annoying' because they would have been trying to 'tempt' him rather than simply 'be there' accompanying him in his ordinary affairs and offering endless gratuitous 'advice' like they all do. 

Yeah, I dunno Anthony. I think apart from your initial great act of giving wealth away (which is pretty meritorious), the rest of the stuff is just a lot of side-tracking, distractions in the way of nothing very special at all. I have never read any account of Anthony's demons that explained what was so atrociously bad about them. So... Demons. So... Phantom wenches... And the point of all of that is what?

Of course, I am being unnecessarily hyper-critical and perhaps unkind too, I suppose. After all, he did give away all his money.

They learn all kinds of stuff.
I don't know what (they learn).
Because that ain't me.
 

There's nothing about this Saint Anthony's life that explains the real underlying mystery of the human existence. He kind of says something to the effect of that you must focus your mind on God, and he doesn't really say 'pray to' or 'worship' or 'submit' or anything like...

Interestingly to me, he does say 'turn your complete attention to -, all the time.' And that is interesting.

There's nothing either though, in the reports and accounts given by others of what that actually means - what are you exactly focusing on, Anthony? When you say 'God' what are you looking at?

When the Old Testament (the Tanakh) says 'dew of heaven' it almost certainly does not mean this was some actual substance that literally came from actual 'heaven' that people all mean when they mean that 'supernal' place and not just simply 'the sky' or 'the clouds.'

If it was dew from actual heaven, then, hey, it might have had some amazing properties and given some amazing sensations... And then Nebuchadnezzar would have been having a good time, being out in the open, with everyone thinking he was in a sad state of things - but he was getting drunk on this 'dew of heaven!'

Alas however I do not think that was the situation.

We're just out here, being in the desert,
being drenched with the dew of heaven...

I am myself not into these 'turns of phrases' just doing for important places and important matters. You know, like it's all just a metaphor.

Nah nah nah nah.

If Anthony of Egypt gave real wealth away from his own material possessions, then God has to give him real heaven, not 'metaphorical heaven!' 

As for the other 'Saint Anthony,' the one that helps you find things - his real birth name was Fernando. And he was from Lisbon, Portugal and he lived in the 12th and 13 centuries AD, and he started off trying to preach to the Moroccan guys who had beheaded five friars - but his ship went off-course and he ended up in Sicily and from there went on to Tuscany, I think.

All these poor human beings, living all kinds of different, and often slightly mixed-up, and sometimes rather mixed-up, lives.

Some are Nebuchadnezzar, and some are the Moroccan King Yusuf II (who denied the attributes of Allah because they were incompatible to his Oneness) who beheaded the first five Franciscan friars when they would not convert to Islam, although, to be fair, they were annoying him as well, since they were trying to 'convert' him as well...

And some are the Anthony who went 'off grid' in the Egyptian desert, and some are the ABBA kids who went to the desert in the dark, at night, under the stars to have photos taken.

And there was one time, this guy who came along, and said that not even King Sulaimaaaaaahn, in all his glory, was arrayed as magnificently, as a single flower bearing the dew of heaven. I added the 'bearing the dew of heaven' bit. Because I can.

Actually it's not even the 'arrayed more magnificently than Solomon in all his glory' part that I'm interested in. It's frankly, that 'and they toil not, neither do they spin.'

You know -, men toil, and women spin. ; )

    

Trying To Keep It Simple!

Hah! How is that gonna happen here?

LOL

Never mind; what can you do...

So, why we are not all 'one consciousness,' and why you are unique...

And then the next thing -, what is all this I see almost everywhere about 'a different reality?'

If it isn't real, it isn't real!

The young girls wear a garland of
dry figs, not dried rose petals!
'Consider the lesson of the fig tree,
when it is time for it to bear fruit.'

The key to 'personality' is not 'thinking,' 'feeling,' and 'behaving.' It is feeling.

Current attempts at developing AI focus on processing, and speed, and numbers of complex connections. You could construe this as 'thinking.' I would not completely reject that.

In some sort of Boolean operator system, a FI/FO process could go backwards and forwards between 'itself' on two parts of a circuit board(!) and that might even be construed to be a kind of 'self-awareness.' Given let's say a primary directive to 'exist' and to stay existing, a thing using Boolean logic gates in a viable moving, and maybe actuator-enabled 'work' mechanism, would react to various sensed signals - hence it would 'behave' in a certain way; exhibit 'behavior.'

See, frankly, it's only the feeling part of psychologists' fairy tale about what personality 'is,' that actually determines unique behavior. You could suppose that there were hard and fast 'boundary conditions' which made certain actions, behaviors absolutely inevitable - and that might be true on the one hand, but then it doesn't cater for the whole Gaussian profile of existential reality. 

We are like steam plumes rising off a hot pool, or snowflakes falling into someone's palm. The attempts to employ ideas like 'Chaos Theory' to salvage some conclusions about the predictability of steam plume spirals or the exact shape of freezing raindrops is bogus. The actions of the spirals are unique moment-to-future moment (within certain parameters) and the shapes of the snowflakes are all actually unique.

Then the girls have a feast of
sizzling garlic prawns...
No they don't. Sorry. Just tryin' to
use 'Chaos Theory' a bit here.

Now I could say something about girls carrying baskets in which there are seeds for various colored flowers, and not each girl's basket has the same number or type of plant seed - but if I did that it would give way too much information to lunatics masquerading as scientists at places like Imperial College London. But in short, there is 'trade in seed' going on... Isn't there?

Every one of you has six 'Caryatid' flower maidens inside of you.

Instead of talking too specifically about that, let us step away from that dangerous area, and just talk about the young high-born virgin maidens, who spend two years (now no one in the whole history of the modern world has ever told you this before, on account it was a close secret even back then when the Parthenon at the Acropolis was 'alive') collecting dew from flowers, until at the end of those two years, they go deep underground into a secret place, where they exchange their dew for something which they carry back up, under a cloth covering. This is called the 'Arrhephoria' rites.

Then, over the next seven years, they learn how to make and bake a magical bread which lots of people can eat, even though there seems to be little of it. 

And then immediately after that, they go back down into the underground place, where they learn the secrets of death and resurrection - and this is called the 'Canephoros' rites.

Which religion is this?

LOL

Frua-designed BMW - when cars
were still on the rising side of the
Gaussian profile. As soon as they are starting
to hit the peak of the curve, parasites and
zombies quickly close in and wreck everything.
That's how it is. For now.

None of this stuff is simple, though. 

What is simple is to know that you are unique. And that no, there is no such thing as 'consciousness is only one consciousness and we all share it and therefore...' Therefore whatever they are trying to say. 

And it's simple enough for you consider this concept that you are permanently entering into potential situations giving you opportunity to exchange types of flowers with others who are fully functioning within.

It's the 'flowers' that really allow you to have 'feelings' at that super complex depth humans can have them, might have them, and in fact however, rarely do experience them. They want them, but they rarely get them.

You, on the other hand, might get what you want.

  

Go To Sources

Well this is no revelation! 

See the thing is, there is so much confusion about ideas from the past these days. 

You can take something quite interesting like Fowles' The Magus and read way too much into it. All it is fundamentally an idea that individual people repeat or 'play out' or mirror, big things that happen across the whole of society, on the national and world stage, and in a sense they also follow in line with concepts of 'labeled' divinities (of the ancient past, of mythology).

Candice Bergen as Artemis, in
The Magus.

The problem for me being that people take what they see there in these sorts of books and films, and impute whatever is in there, to the actual original descriptions about the 'gods' that ancient people had.

I'll give you a really good example from right now, today.

If you look up 'Lucretius,' the first century BC thinker and poet - who wrote 'The Nature of Things' (apparently in five books, all composed in verse form) - all you find is a vast echo-chamber across the internet saying that, 'despite Lucretius being probably the first person who proposed Evolution, and the first who explain atoms as the building blocks of everything, he also ended his first book declaring the absurdity of the idea that the Earth was a sphere, even though this was by then an established view among most thinkers.'

Yeah well you find me where he actually says any such thing and I will give you a pat on the back.

He never says it! At all. He was writing in Latin to a retired Roman Tribune who was intending to purchase some land nearby where Lucretius lived, with the view of building a property there where he (Memnius, not Lucretius) and others were going to write pornography. Lucretius was trying to dissuade Memnius.

For the vegetable-loving people:
blistered padrons.

And he uses some words like 'mundus' which never meant 'the Earth' back then, and which Lucretius is clearly using in terms of the visible, manifest, material Universe of things, everything, including things in space. And he is actually describing Universal gravity or gravitational forces - and saying that what others are suggesting about it is absurd -, and it is in the context of what he is talking about.

But how are you ever going to get to every single remorseless ignorant uneducated idiot, who keeps saying that he said something that he never said?

You'll be wasting your time. The lesson they all never learned at any stage, was to go consult the actual sources.

And then, in any case afterwards, you'd have to go 'fix up' the next piece of, and every other piece of bloody nonsense that is just simply everywhere these days, masquerading as 'facts' and 'information!'

Unfortunately one combined total overall effect of this kind of thing is it promotes this notion that, well, these 'smart' people of the past, yes they were smart, about one or two things, but see, they didn't know this or they were foolish and ignorant about that... So therefore just don't go looking too closely at them or go too deeply into what they can teach, because we know everything - and they didn't.

It's completely the other way round.

And fennel and almond soup.
Not too bad this stuff...

So did Jesus really morph on that road into a different-looking body or body structure and face, or was it maybe a completely different body altogether - when those two 'did not recognize Him because He appeared in another form to them?'

You will even get mainstream church people actually say: 'No, He didn't.' And then they'll give all kinds of weird explanations that are not found in any source text at all to justify what they are wanting to assert to be true.

The actual source text unambiguously says 'He appeared in another form to them.'

Now you can really split hairs here trying to make the word 'appear/ed' apply just to what the two people witnessing something were doing exclusively (IE 'seeing' thus apprehending that which 'appeared' lol), and but not, apply to the existential minute specific dimensions of the actual figure itself/Himself. 

Yet the text does not say 'appeared as if like another form;' it says in another form.

So yes, Christians have more than just three 'gods:' they have Father, Son, Holy Ghost, Mary (LOL I include this for Dr Zakir Naik and his followers), Baby Jesus, Jesus 1, and Jesus 2.

Which leads us nicely back to my real point started up by a good questioner here earlier on: What is Personality?

The Christian 'Father' God, does not have the same personality as His Son -, 'Jesus.' And by all accounts this 'Holy Spirit' has quite a distinct character and personality as well. But they all have 'God' powers. And they all have the same 'God' powers. And which makes them all equally 'Divinity.' 

Lucretius puts this type of conceptual problem this way: '...emerging from the arrangements of distinct particles.' And I agree with him.

The Caryatids.
Sort of '5 of 5' I suppose.
They are the 'Maidens of Karyai,'
who as real people in real life
carry baskets of live reeds on their heads as if they
were dancing plants.'
; ) Sacred to Artemis.

'7' is integral with '9' and with all of the Nine. But she has an individual separate real personality. So they are several persons who are one thing (when integrated).

Did Jesus 2 have different particles in Him, compared to Jesus 1? Or was it just that the arrangement of particles was different?

LOL

This is what is known as an Irish Catholic Question. What happened to His fingernail clippings, and His hair? The Muslims have much more 'rugged' questions about it but along the same lines.

Look. Look. Don't break your mind on this. This is just me being silly for a while here.

And yes, I could easily drift into the 'And Loki kept all the nail clippings in order to make a ship from to save some people in the world at the Ragnarok later...'

This is the 'Holy Blood, Holy Grail' kind of thing again, you see. Do Jesus' nail clippings have all the Divine powers of the rest of the particles which make 'Him' up...?

Aaaaaah! See it all turns on what we are proposing 'Him' to even be.

Don't worry, I'll distract you
well enough that you won't have seen
part of the super secret here.

Same goes for 'you.' And 'me.' All of us are something about what we are on the unseen inside, and which thing has zero need to tie any single particle or set of particles on the material 'outside' to the 'us,' the real 'us.'

But believe me, the worst possible thing, would be for some staggeringly advanced thinker or philosopher way more advanced even than Lucretius, to perfectly pin down what that set of internal compositions was, which made up the personality that could move from one 'arrangement of particles' to another and yet fully still be the same actual person. 

Because then you'd have AI promoters and CGI companies all literally manufacturing you.

Meaning human beings as such.

Luckily, it's a mystery. That they will never find out. And this, my friends, is why people such as Pythagoras and especially Orpheus (and Ovid - do you read... ...Ovid?) had 'mystery schools' that required initiation into and all kinds of very serious oaths and so on to be taken before certain levels of knowledge was imparted. I don't have this kind of stuff to impart though. Whew. Got away with that one pretty good for the moment.

Great music (relax, lay your head down on this):

'A' Problem With Reading The Bible

Look, we have a real problem with reading the Bible as modern, pretty much fairly super-intelligent people. Actually we have two or three problems: and I will just briefly mention the first mundane ones - these are that it is 1. A text consisting of details of some very intelligent, highly intellectual in fact, albeit they are in ancient eras, and socially responsible, and at the time socially-credited, creditable, people, and their views and opinions. 2. It has some socially-consented witness accounts of 'god things;' the literal interaction of God with men. Let's not worry for the moment about how reliable these witness accounts are, simply accept for argument's purposes that people made witness statements literally 'under oath to a Supreme Being/Divinity;' and let's not add our own 'and witness accounts of what they thought they saw...' 

Let's go for coffee...

That's an utterly pointless argument from this moment in time now looking backwards. It's maybe appropriate for archaeologists and excavation people -, those looking for artifacts, things; it's not appropriate for people examining ideas.

See if someone gave you 'the Laws' or a law, that's already an idea. It doesn't require any verification at all that the identity who ordained the law was real or true or not or whatever. If the idea behind that law is nuts, then the giver is automatically already equally nuts, and that's all there is to it.

And but THEN THEN THEN (and here is the important part), there are, or 'maybe' because these are so announced in the text - actual 'speakings' of actual 'God,' which are also written down, and appear in the whole text of 'the Bible.' The Bible is not therefore 'the' Word of God, it is some words 1. about God, 2. about people's witness statements and accounts, and finally 3. some words of God.

If you go into the weeds about 'whole thing is inspired by God' well that actually runs into so many real factual problems it isn't funny and it just isn't practical for smart people.

But by far the worst modern-day problem is that the translations themselves are problematic.

The best modern resource is BibleHub online, but this is constantly peppered away at by people trying to hack it or create DNS issues because there is a very silly modern antipathy to just 'having religion around' in any form. And that is nuts because scientists don't block information. They can question it always, but they don't pretend to deny its existence.

Nevertheless...

So here's an example of something problematic: you go to BibleHub, Mark 4:19 'the cares of this life, the deceitfulness of riches...' And so on into the rest of the sentence.

Well right there we have a source for all of this Puritanical anti-wealth, anti-materialism, love and glorifying of poverty that is completely abundant in the West.

Where are the gods hiding?

Right down the bottom of the page at BibleHub, however, you will always find - right down at the very very bottom - the original Greek and/or Aramaic. And so often you will be just left scratching your head going: 'How did they get from this, to how they are reading it commonly now in English??'

'Cares.' The word is merimnai. It doesn't mean 'cares' it means the solicitude. Which maybe can be construed to include caring, but really, it means that someone or something is solicitous, as in the archaic implication of soliciting, calling for, pulling in, begging.

'This life' is almost impossible to say to people now -, that if you consider it in context, it means people living in the Messianic Dawn era, who are actually 'left behind;' who are simply a remnant albeit a powerful material existential social group/a society; the (human) society - but not in the Messianic Realm at all.

'Deceifulness.' The word is apate, and boy could I take you back into 'Apophis' here! Because how can you get away from the fact, that this 'Jesus' was fourteen years in Egypt. What was He doing there? Many early exegetic texts give accounts, and they are basically that He trained with Egyptian temple priests! The end. That's the end of it.

Actually no, not the end - the actual word literally in Greek, means the personification of lying greed; like a snake thing. So, Apophis.

'Riches.' It's not riches - it's pletho or ploutos, the Underworld or Earthly god of overflowing treasures, jealously held.

And there's way more.

Here we are, stuck today, in total nonsense everywhere. 

Amazing person. Was just starting to be
successful at 18 - when both her parents
passed away within a year of each other.
Haliene. Just an amazing person.

How do you get - and the Quran commits this sin totally, too - 'and Satan refused to bow down to the creature made from clay...?'

God, the Creator God in this case, made a dynamic thing from clay, and breathed His own breath into it and it lived.

Well Satan is not being asked to, as a form of action, 'bow down!' As in for thousands of years, a whole world of idiots have been making pictures showing Alexander prostrating like the Persians and then everyone who submitted before Alexander also prostrating, aka bowing down to...

But hey look, the thing is - God's own Divine Breath went into the clay man, and when He bid the angels and the rest of the Council of the Elohim and all of this to follow Him into there, Satan said, 'I'm not going into that!'

The Jews cannot show you Jehovah.

The Satanists cannot show you Satan. They can do some bad and very hurtful things and you will think, for sure, that is pretty awful... Must be 'Satan' right? Nope. Nothing physical you can see and touch at all, in terms of an actual being.

You maybe want to see some beings from other worlds, with masses of great high technology, new to us.

But I can absolutely show you, well, why don't you pick anyone at all, of the ancient figures ancient cultures and societies thought were 'gods,' and whom they considered really and truly to be real, and able to manifest for sure: Hercules did, so they say. Many others.

You know exactly where they all are. Because I have just told you and that indeed does make me someone who can 'remove the veil.' Because in fact I just did do that. Now you go find your 'Aphrodite.'

Easy peasy. 

Roasted cod with cognac cream sauce and
tarragon, and, and...

Instead of being merimnai'd by the remnant world, why don't you peitho it and merimnai it back, or, as in this example, her back. Or him too, if you need - there is a 'him' of that side of things.

Don't tell me, after you have read this you do not know where the gods are all hiding!

Did the early churches and religious scholars and rulers know? Well it's like this, you see - here's the hint:

Amr al As, during the rise of Islam, completely overran Alexandria, where Alexander the Great had placed this stela, the 'Apophis' one (and by the way, nobody has translated the glyphs on it at all so don't bother seriously considering what people think the stela says) - and he was burning all of the religious texts, not just the Christian ones, but 'somebody' luckily took the stela away before he could vandalize it, and then later later later on, funny, but the Muslim Ottoman ruler, Ali Pasha, when he wanted to get some favors from the Austrian Empire, 'suddenly,' he found it in a Franciscan Monastery wall in 1829 and presented it to Prince Metternich, from which act we now get its modern label the Metternich Stela.

Freyja, of course, the Norse Aphrodite, does have a space ship which she shares with her brother. And this is Skidbladner. She also has 'chariots.' Just sayin'.

You need to be looking closer to home... (But with great headphones, right?).