Group Sick Think

So this 'former CIA official' was in the media just a minute ago, saying that the idea of a China Study Center will foster 'group think.'

Yeah? Well, what's wrong with group think? As long it is not group sick think.

The announcement of an actual 'China Study Center' is a statement that the US government will now have an open public access-media(!) focal-point from which it will launch deliberate counter-propaganda, against the prevailing, and fairly long-term China propaganda kinetics.

'Elijah, what are you doing here?'
'Never mind what I'm doing here - who TH are you
and what are you doing here?!'

It is not as if 'suddenly,' they came up with the idea of a 'China Study' group.

The sure signs of an approaching war are organised systematic national propaganda efforts, and governments messing around with maps - I'm not saying that was what the US sub ran into, some 'unmapped' oil rig, because I do think it was fired upon with an unarmed torpedo.

When it comes to modern ideas about how people think at all, and how they have 'opinions' (because of course, as you know, only sci-entists, and global man-made climate change experts know Truth, and possess 'real' facts...) - the internal machinery of all of these government-sponsored propaganda groups is interesting to me.

The 'theory of mind' itself is pretty interesting and entertaining.

Now it wouldn't matter, shouldn't even matter, to most of you whether what I'm about to say next is true or not true...

...but I am not in that group of souls who looks up at the night skies, plays LED (or gosh, even actual expensive real laser beams) lights up into there, holds hands with other people, 'thinks' about how peaceful our intentions are, and then has imaginary encounters with invisible 'beings' or 'presences.'

Louis Vuitton. LOL. Imagine
wearing a stoopid thing like that
in the city streets! Not.
Never would happen - not
unless you're very brave.

I actually get a little note on my desk, which is an invitation almost always, to a brand-name fashion show or something very similar, and then I turn up to it at the correct designated time and place, and there will always be someone to meet with me.

There's no point sending such notes to labs to find out how they were made or where they really came from - because they are all actual 'invitations' from large-scale commercial businesses. It's just that I'm not formally on anyone's 'special invite guest list!'

The funniest thing was this one time, in a fairly large semi-government organisation, a middle-rank manager 'left' after having been there a few months (after the job was done) - and then no one could find the employment records and they couldn't even find if such a person really existed, for real. They all knew the person - had been working with them for months.

Anyway, anyway. It is important at this stage for us, sorry me, me - to drop off as many people from reading here as are going to say, 'aaargh this guy is just crazy, let's all go home.'

As for the rest of you mutually-crazy people, I do not 'see' ET Alien 'ghosts.' I do not have 'visions' about them or about anything else (I do have nightmares about that other 'crazy' - Uncle Xi).

For, in fact, no no - we get to have actual 'meet ups' in person.

And I have a ton of questions, but I keep them all in the back of my head nowadays.

They clam up all of a sudden if you ask something they don't want to tell you about.

For example, just yesterday, I was at a Louis Vuitton thing in the local city here. And I was walking outside of the place I was supposed to be going into. And there was 'so-and-so' right out the front there, waiting. Six foot tall at least. So taller, you see, if they are wearing designer high heels.

I never noticed the side
of this building before...

Ordinary dark blue jeans, decent expensive office-workers day blouse. Ah, but you know, it will not take you long to realize and recognize -, this ain't no 'human human kind of being.' Looks human - except not if you actually look hard.

But people don't look.

Me neither.

So she says hardly anything and nods upwards and looks at the side of this building, see.

Now I have worked in this street - Mill Street, Perth, Western Australia. I almost leased an office in one of the really good new buildings there one time. I definitely answered to people literally exactly across both roads (it's a corner building, the one I'm looking up at the side wall of, now...) in big-time government offices there.

For all of the decades I have lived off and on in this city, I never not one single time consciously registered that the side wall of this building I am looking at now - was not flat.

Well but I have to admit these people really are very good-looking and it's quite fascinating to just stare at them - unless that means they are going steal the food off your plate at the Belgian Beer place; that's not so great. Especially if it happened to be really good food, which it mostly always is there; really good.

Anyway I was about to just stare while asking 'yeah okay I never saw that before, that's amazing that I never noticed that - what about it, though?'

And they just nod and say nothing and head off into the 'show' and I go there too, and there is an actual small queue at the entrance to check your invitation and they get to walk around the queue, right through and then... ...gone.

Was a good show, too.

Empty Paris streets, after the rain.

You can be as smart as all get out. But it's many many times all about the assigning of importance and value to particular things - that allows your brain to notice, to genuinely observe everything that is staring back at you, there on the page, 'in the picture' as it were.

I realized from a very early age,  literally as a child growing up in a tropical rain-forest jungle, that at night, in the dark there were countless eyes on you: beetles, other insects, geckos, owls, lots of night things. And in the day, if you were walking inside the jungle itself, there were hidden eyes in the growth, in the vegetation, up in the trees and between the vines, on the vines, too.

Some of those 'eyes' were your friends, and some were potentially not your friends.

In much of the modern literature they always say 'and such people ascribe to various coincident and not connected things, causal meaning to certain particular events or effects.'

And that may be true, too.

There is a kind of an 'architectural affectation' on the side wall of that building that I only just yesterday noticed. All the way down from the top right to the bottom - a large inward scooped panel section.

I have absolutely no idea what 'special meaning' there is at all, either to it itself, or to my having only just then noticed it after having walked past it for decades.

...All the people are walking around in the city streets.

Some of them may have noticed and been completely aware of that architectural affectation on the side of that building. I certainly was not. And I'm a very observant individual.

But for me now, it gets to a point where I admit, we are blind as bats. We are walking around seeing absolutely nothing. Because what we 'see' is centered around what we pretend is important.

Because we carry in our heads, points of attention; things that require our attention.

'I have to go pay this bill.'

'I have to go fulfill this obligation to this person.'

'I have to go eat.'

Okay, okay, no wait on that last thing - I want to go eat some nice stuff. 

One day, very soon, I know that I will be pointing out, right in here something: 'Hey, did you notice this?'

And those who are still here will say to yourselves, 'Oh dear. Now what??! Now that that is real...'

Don't worry. At that time you too will - and some of you may already have - 'invitations.'

I'm actually not really the best guy to be getting those things anyway. I only ever have one type of 'question' that I want to ask.

LOL

I mean how they get here doesn't mean anything to me. What science and technology they have to share is of exactly no interest to me at all!

And the question?

'Are you susceptible to alcohol and do you want this thing shaken or stirred?'

Except I already know the answers to that and they know I know.

'They.' Right? These are the invisible things that no one else sees, apparently, and that I must be imagining or hallucinating.

It's actually quite wonderful that some you are still prepared to believe that foolishness.

Here we are, literally hidden in plain open sight. To all.

You ('you') fancy that you are sailing around, above the water, deep below the water, at least through the water, and you know everything that is there around you...

I can only laugh.

And then one day you hit something, that you never thought was there. Your problem, not mine.

The real question is this: what makes Elijah so sure he knows who he is talking to?

And if you get that, my friends, you get 'the all!' Go to work, Bud Fox.

Gratifying?

Just today, somewhere, somewhere in 'prestige lifestyle magazines...' ...somewhere, they took something from right off these pages and ran with it.

Won't say where, or which publication.

Just shows you what a few of us have been complaining about here for months on end now: the world has 'lost it.' By which I mean 'the high end,' all the 'smart folks' with their big budgets and outrageous silly ideas well downstream from any silly ideas that people have been coming up with around here!

When you are a big criminal politician
or judge, you can go to Mayfair
to an Aston Martin 'boutique' there
and pretend that you are James Bond.

My Russian analyst friends always talk about how the internet world has become increasingly 'atomized' - talking about the way people with special interests just all gravitate in the exact same places and with most of those places being 'put there' anyway by Google.

People with the money, supposedly, literally have no ideas left.

And that, even given the fact that for much of the time they were just regurgitating what some Parisian scribbler invented three hundred years ago. At least they did a bit of tugging and adding to and re-forming what they 'borrowed' in the first place.

Now they just have seemed to have completely lost both the will, and the ability.

There is no passion in any of it.

Is it gratifying to see the Bond franchise drive itself off the road into a ditch? Nope.

Is it gratifying to see people hive your stuff off and use it in so-called 'mainstream' publications and movies? Not particularly. I don't mind 'attention,' you know, as in 'being noticed' but then, it's all about who you are being noticed by, right?

I mean what if they all die (die out!) now - kill themselves through boredom and kill everyone else the same way?

But if you're my GF, I'll give you
this instead.

The business model of 'influencer' is riddled with question-marks about what that was all about to begin with, and who is influencing whom for whose profits' sake.

Were any of the 'very private club magazines' ever about influencing anyone? No, not really. How could they have been? People were in those places who were the influencers in the first place. They wanted to hang out among their own kind, and they wanted to do that privately.

The matter was already 'atomized' in a very real sense.

Today, we have this whole mentality, this mindset about hugely criminal people and their highly criminal enterprises, hiding their illegal cash in an 'atomized' private club, essentially.

And who are they? Basically, all of government high officials, all of the political elite, all of the media groupies and talking heads, and a couple of Russian banksters thrown in to show some kind of 'those guys are really bad' thing.

Honestly, today's so-called
'rich people' are second-rate.

How come apparently, everyone who stole money from voters and tax-payers and citizens all stuck their money in the same money laundering place? Which turned out to be way short of truly private and secure!

The bottom line is this Pandora nonsense is just the tip of the iceberg. They're all doing it, in multiple places, some of which have not as yet been 'exposed.'

Naturally scientists and doctors and academics are all immune to moral compromise at all times and they never tell lies nor indulge in fancy stuff to trick you.

It's only the obvious usual suspects - you know, African politicians and the King of Jordan.

So how come the US government jailed whatsisname, that actor - Wesley Snipes - for openly and not exactly even 'hiding his wealth' but invoking a flawed idea about the Constitution regarding paying your taxes?

Is anyone ever going to be jailed for all of this 'Pandora' actual clandestine money laundering?

No.

No one. In fact, you watch people actually get shot first before the whole thing is 'deep sixed.'

I want to give at least the smart people who come here some 'ways' - some 'ways ahead...'

Sure I could get '*' (someone very special) to come here and talk to everyone every now and then.

But it is not time yet. Believe me, not just yet.

Right now, just imagine yourself walking in a French forest somewhere.... Somewhere like, here, in this pic.

There is absolutely no one else in there with you. You are alone.

I am alone.

We... ...are alone.

There's just us.

...But if someone appears on that path, walking towards you from the other end, are you going to take to them all of the stupid nonsense baggage that has attended your every single waking ego-driven moment since you were, um, oh I dunno - twenty-three?

What is it that you are so sure you know?

And I am not talking to every single person here because I know there are many of you who do not deserve this scolding.

If you think, in your wildest 'rational expectations' that we are not about to produce something so absolutely extraordinary on the world stage that it will clean blow your socks off, well, you have not encountered the little kids were were brought up in the back-alleys and bazaars of South East Asia, in the monsoons, and big tidal wave floods, and incidents with the stolen circus tigers let to roam around the competitors stall areas... 

If that kid tells you there is a 'f*ing' tiger in the dark in there, there is a tiger in there! Those kids, see, make their reputation on telling the truth, there is no value to them in 'calling wolf.' They have to trade next week and the week after, and the week after that.

Yes CIA is about to take on Beijing's CCP.

Good. Now they will learn just how many animals are here in the forest, where, you know, you thought you were alone and there was no one... ...but you. In there. Walking along.

LOL

Let's see everyone bring their A-game to this knife party this time.

Because not many are going to walk out of this one alive.

What's coming down the line is astonishing. Big big tigers. Big hungry, wild, untamed tigers.

You think you are tough, boys at the AFP?

Luci Romberg again. The real deal.
And how.

And my god, just think of the arrogance of MI6. They even had 'Felix Leiter' killed in that last 'Bond.'

Hahahahaha. But let's see it. You guys are really tough when you haven't seen what you're against.

Let me tell you guys something - I, as in me personally, I told the Australian Federal Police, that there were teams of Arabs scoping the Sydney Rialto Tower, and they were working from a serious plan to knock over a tall building. They laughed at me. Took a few years but then...

And no one ever came to say, well how did you know? I kinda got yelled at by people from my old office, where I worked once upon a time in the long long ago.

I knew because my adoptive step-brother retired the head of a secret intelligence body, well, in fact the secret intel one, of a certain foreign Islamic country. And, there are bound to be files on me and my family background 'hidden' somewhere in half a dozen 'Allied' Western countries, especially in Australia -  I have no doubt at all. In fact I know so. Unless someone shredded them and I can't see that happening.

This new thing...

It's gonna happen. Nothing can stop it.

Time-frame is who knows and who cares, not me.

You are on that pathway in the forest all alone, remember?

Whereas actually, someone is 'all alone,' and it is neither you nor me. We already won this game. People haven't worked it out yet. ...I know you don't even feel like a winner. Yet. But you will. You stay around here. I'll tell you when to 'duck.'

Part II 'Salt Gift'

Believe me, I was trying to have this post nice and relaxing and fun: designed just for you to actually get something pleasant from.

It's not going to happen. ...Maybe if you pick your way through the minefields, and take out the little personally useful bits.

Yeah... The northern lights do make a nice tinkling sound if you are right under them and it is an otherwise very quite spot where you are standing, or even, maybe right on top of a mountain. It's the electrification of the atmosphere when the massive ion shower from space from the sun flares enters the Earth atmosphere, messing with the Earth's electromagnetic field.

Huge huge ionic forces though. Nothing like what you would be able to measure with a tiny hand-held ozone generator over a few grains of salt.

Anyway.

Benu fountain pen. Remember this - 
it becomes important later here...

 

So yesterday, the government of Singapore announced its new 'anti foreign interference' laws.

These are designed to curtail the local population from seeing or hearing - at least via any locally-available media platforms - anything that would be deemed by the Singapore government and its judiciary, as 'hostile messaging.'

At the same time, in Moscow, the marketing agency in charge of the promoting and publicity for Tchaikovsky music, announced that it too, would issue an edict declaring war on all the people around the world, especially those people with an interest in music - from saying anything hostile to the memory of Tchaikovsky or hostile to the playing of his music anywhere. The Beethoven Institute also announced similar actions, and from now on, no one is allowed to say that the time signatures that modern transcribed Beethoven music all have, are wrong and way too fast.

Anyone found either speaking in hostile tones about timing signatures, or saying they don't like Tchaikovsky's Nutcracker Suite for instance, or voicing hatred of children's joy at Christmas - will be instantly taken out and shot. But they will have the choice to be either 1. shot right away, or 2. stopped from ever speaking again, and have to attend court where they will be found guilty and then shot.

Highly underrated actor, Brosnan.

What does the government of Singapore fear?

LOL

I'm sure I cannot tell you now, because, the local government here - which I have been saying is in the pocket of the Singapore ruling oligarchs, also framed and passed the exact same 'law.'

What does the government of Singapore fear?

Well I'll tell you who would know - the American CIA would know. And, it's about time they grew a pair and told the truth about old 'Harry Lee.'

But that'll never happen, of course. I should not be so harsh on CIA. They got plenty-a-you-know-what's. They have to maintain a politically low profile, so to speak, despite whatever their underlying actual plans are... 

This, is style. You don't need a 'Mayfair'
dodgy tax property to have real style. It doesn't
have to be new, it doesn't have to be 'out-of-
the-box' clean, either.

This stuff doesn't bother me. I couldn't care less, really. No current-day oligarch is about to sit in my lounge and open a bottle of inexpensive Glen Moray 12-year old with me and let the truth be vented in that genial atmosphere. It's all fake with those guys. They maintain this outward pretense of urbane civility and inside they are nothing but a seething pit of vipers.

...And some of you would ask me 'well why, why are saying the rods from God are going to hit there?'

Because, that's why. It's better that you don't know until afterwards.

I mean at this point that 'government' can do all the 'anti-interference' law stuff that it wants - it is not going to stop what will happen there.

There is a thing in the Bible, and it pertains not just to the past but to right now - the words are '...lest I come and strike the land with a decree of utter destruction.'

There is a reason why you and I are not 'God' ourselves and why we cannot go around falling in step with the thing called 'the law of one' and all of that similar ideology which is pretty common around the place these days.

Singapore has 'lights' but they 
are Satan masquerading as an angel.

We simply do not have the moral authority. We have as much, or as little, as the knowledge and memories that we have accumulated in our meager lifetimes, in our heads.

But the same is true of governments too, though. When they act like gods, and claim that their 'corporate memories' are intact - but they lie - then they are playing into the hands of extremely negative historical forces. You see, you do not need to resort to 'god talk' to get this: whatever it was that 'created' the conditions for Hitler, for example, if they were never resolved properly, well, then they are still there now.

If Jews want to psychologize the whole affair and say 'we made a sacrifice of ourselves before our God,' then why bring Him into it at all, if you go ahead and do the same things all over again that led to that disaster in the first place? What 'sacrifice' are you really making?

I'm not actually talking 'Jews' here. I'm using that blaring case as the example of psychological justifications that people all do, who are unwilling to face the facts.

The government of Singapore, and I've said this on more than one occasion before, could not last overnight if you stuck me and two or three others with the same knowledge on a public platform along with some government representative there to defend the government - and we opened up for even just twenty minutes.

Today we live in a world of 'toxic skepticism.'

'Benu' is a Russian-made pen.
Glows in the dark, see.

This means there are a lot of people with the motivation to say 'black' when a thing is 'white.'

And then there is the technique of shifting perspective and distance - meaning, they deliberately go either under or over the 'conditional state threshold definitions.' Well we all do know that atomic structures are mostly 'full' of empty 'space.' So what? You whack your head hard against a brick wall and it isn't the 'empty space' that will be making your head hurt.

...One cruse of salt and Elijah turned the barren land into a flourishing, verdant place.

Just one cruse of salt.

I don't even need that much.

Why do some fireflies do 'synchronous flashing?'

I dunno. I'm not an entomologist.

I do, however, know how to make your neural networks fire synchronously to something, I'm not saying what here though.

This track below - it's all just boring 'beat-matching' time-wasting until 1 min., and 3 seconds in:

  

"When Star Flowers Fall"

Those of you who have been with us for a while are in for a treat. We're going to write a new 'Bond story' right here.

And the really clever ones among you will end up with dollars in your hand.

I am going to take you, step-by-step, through the active process of what would ordinarily be 'outlier analysis' of an official kind - these things come from academia; they don't come from any 'MI5/6' or anyone else anyway - they start where the intellectuals are, or are being trained.

A writer in Dukes Bar, where Fleming
invented his 'Vesper Martini.' 
Or I think he invented it, or something...

But in this case, not only is this not 'outlier' anything, but you will watch it all unfold before your very eyes in real life, out there 'up' on the world stage, and by the end of it, you will be left wondering whether stories about 'walking on water' are not just true, but ridiculously, absurdly so, and that we have all been led down a garden path into nowhere in life -, where we might have been going actually 'somewhere.'

So... Let us begin.

Sometimes, it is a mistake to read too much into certain things. Tamiko Bolton is not a Chinese 'honey trap.' And she is not a Japanese 'honey trap,' either. She is not a 'honey trap' at all.

But that's not the problem.

...Let me explain something to you that will never make it into the Western newspapers. This week's return to the so-called 'Lux Leaks,' or 'Panama Papers' - although they are now being termed 'the Pandora Papers' - are designed to give everyone the impression that these literally are actual documents obtained or 'leaked' from private banks about secret bank accounts.

Well apart from the fact that secret banking - or 'confidential banking' - does not fundamentally operate this way, in that no such records like these are ever made internally, the source of the 'secret banks' is not in a location where genuine highest level secret banks are.

I don't have a problem with a female
'Bond.' This is Luci Romberg, and she can run up
that wall all the way. And, she is sponsored by
Aston Martin, so I don't know WTH
the Bond producers are doing!!

Oh yes, there is certainly a widespread public opinion to the effect that Panama and Caribbean banking are locations for such things; but it simply isn't true with respect to major private, secret banking.

What you are being 'offered' by the media, are a few African politicians' attempts to hide wealth, as usual too, the Kingdom of Jordan's leadership accounts (Jordan is broke and a puppet of the West) and then, mixed in with those relatively truthful accounts' details, are sophisticated accounting reconstructions, albeit they will proceed from genuine known facts in the hands of MI6 and Europol, but which are not actual 'money' trails but people trails.

To those of you who are very clever, suspicious, and paranoid, the quite recent situation to do with the mistress of the then king of Spain, reveals something: you see, the Spanish king already realized that it would have been little use to him, to use the Spanish 'secret banking' networks... ...to hide his affairs. And so, I am directly asserting that one of the locations of 'secret banking' is Spain, and inter alia particularly those industrial-linked countries that very big Spanish concerns have major associations with - Columbia and Mexico particularly, and I hope you can 'make the connection.' About something... ...that comes from out of those two places.

The Spanish banking scene can handle itself and so it's not a big issue mentioning them here.

And now, I am going to switch back to the recent theme in these pages, to do with assassination. Nobody is free from the 'karma' of killing. Even though I have mentioned in the past, that there is no penalty among the 'ganas' or 'devas' for killing an entity that has not reached the base chakra of the celestial (the human biological 'base chakra' is simply the one you are familiar with, but the 'base chakra' of the divine being, is the violet chakra in the head, or active intentional, willed intellect) - there is a consequence for killing some being that has reached this secondary level, and even for the killing of lesser beings, the higher beings resent that they have to do it at all.

Kris Singh has his Astons
painted with real Moondust. We could
have ours with just plain white paint...
...And the Stardust Melody as its aura.

So their very anger itself is a kind of 'karmic' result.

That is why, by the way, in the Sutras, large earthquakes and volcanic eruptions are said to take place, because they are a foretelling that some major Divinely-ordered killing is going to happen. The anger of the devas is shown before the event, so that afterwards, they do not need to remain angry too much, since the necessary thing has been carried out. It is before the necessary thing that their anger reaches a peak - because they are angry the evil being does not retract from its course and direction while it has a chance to.

When you consider a 'Bond story structure' it looks like there is a 'villain,' but, in fact in all of the books (I can't think of one that isn't this way), there is someone who is not so much simply 'evil,' as unique and innovative in their plan to upset the apple-cart, so to speak.

Goldfinger does not want to steal the gold in Fort Knox - he wants to irradiate it to render it useless to trade. He already has a sufficient 'lock' on enough trade-able gold supplies.

To a large extent before the 'ultimate contest' phase begins - the one in which the ludicrously undermanned MI6 throws it's 'Mr Bond James Bond' into the fray - the 'villain' already has the material in hand that he wishes to exploit.

I don't have to kill you to hurt you.

In the same way, if I were a truly evil and villainous person, with amazing resources, I would kidnap Tamika Bolton, not because I do not already know all there is to know about George Soros - but when I tortured her on camera, and showed it to you, then you would believe what it is about George I already know...

The meaningful consequences flow from what you believe, not from what I already know.

And then, of course, since this is just a story, a fictional fairy tale, we too, can throw in our 'Mr Bond James Bond' and he, or she, or some t-gender or neuter Chinese-plus-mixed-ethnic eunuch who likes to wear bunny ears (because this is, as you know, the contemporary glamour fashion ideal... lol), can 'rescue' Tamika and neuter-a-lize the villain of the piece.

LOL

That's not going to happen in our fairy tale, of course, but you know what I mean.

Here's our opening theme song. By MaryJo Lilac, and man can she sing.

Is It Really Dangerous?

(I shouldn't be so dire! I know, I know. I'll get back to the calm, cute stuff soon).

There is a brilliant Australian academic, one time head of China analysis for the Australian Defense Department, Paul Monk - and one of the things he says about analysis that has to be made from only very limited clear facts, or at some distance of time, particularly, from the thing or the people being looked at, is that you have to have an accountable conclusion; when you reach it.

And that is a very important thing.

The Hollywood 'imaginators' call this
a 'biomask.'

There are too many people at highest levels these days who are simply not accountable, realistically, they are not - and their decisions suffer from the arrogance which comes from that level of personal comfort.

The very idea of accountability is manifold. One can be 'accountable' in terms of the process itself that one is using, but then, one can also be accountable in terms of the actual results of the mistakes in reaching a wrong conclusion.

In academic discussions about risk (and this applies equally to economic risk evaluation), one always considers the weight (the value, or the depth of losses) of the outcome when looking at the 'odds,' or the 'chances.'

So, although the odds might be long against something happening, that may not be a sufficient reason not to assume that 'risk' if the outcome itself (the favorable one) were really exorbitantly huge and the 'ante up' not very big. (Leaving aside for the moment the other aspect of 'comparative risk assessment:' the question of making choices between two or several different things).

EG 'Poor soldier risks his head to uncover the mystery of the dancing shoes' - in that fairy tale. If he 'wins,' he will effectively become a prince and get to marry the princess of his choosing.

He is too old to fight in any more wars, he doesn't have many marketable skills, and he is more or less coming to the end of his life anyway...

You gotta love that! Ferrari 375.

Going back to the thing in view here - if an advanced intelligent species were to make overt threats to kill just one person, the 'accountability' question resolves quite neatly and easily to an assessment of the influence spread of that target, and an outright moral assessment over one person's death.

But if they were to make overt threats to literally massacre a lot of people, the moral dimensions shift to well, why? Why actually kill so many individual living people?

If you go back to the ancient traditional narrative, by example (we have to leave out the so-called 'Battle of Kurukshetra;' it's too complicated for the moment to consider that), of Sodom and Gomorrah, was there ever a point where those people were warned at all? That doesn't appear to emerge clearly from the narrative at all. All it says is many people complained for a long time about the behavior of the rulers of S & G.

I actually was listening to a real 
'analyst' (yes, one of those; a female too)
just today and I'm fascinated that she 
thought she was so smart she knew what 'louche'
meant, having repeated what is everywhere
across the internet about what it is supposed
to mean. ...Thought, she knew, anyway.
I never said anything. I'm telling you I don't
believe what the on-line definitions say. And
I don't care they claim some Latin word origin.

It never says that any 'prophet' was ever sent there and told them 'oh you'd be watch out, because otherwise you're gonna get smashed!'

LOL

Actually, funny because the New Testament says 'it shall be more tolerable for the land of Sodom and Gomorrah in the day... ...than for that city.' Meaning various places that are not doing whatever it is that they are supposed to be doing.

Well how is it going to be 'more tolerable?' How much worse intolerable are things expected to be now??

There are a bunch of places in the Jordan Valley, notable now Tall el-Hammam, where there is nothing but sulfur and salt crystals and smashed silicon from what might have been a meteor collision and massive heat damage.

Well I personally cannot condone slaughtering 6 million people or anything from '1' innocent naive person up to that many (6 mil) - in say, oh, um, some island place like Singapore.

So my vote will not be cast for anything like that.

...On the other hand, it wouldn't be beyond the thinking to do something a whole lot worse still.

My my though, what could even be 'a whole lot worse?'

I don't know! Why don't you ask those who deeply probe the Bible. LOL

They must surely know something, at least.

'It will be more tolerable in that day for the land of Sodom...'

Wow. Really?

Not scared at all, anyone, right?

You see these creatures emerging from out of the depths of the abyss wearing their 'biomasks' and we shall see who's tough then. Won't ever happen, you say?

Uh-huh.

Let me see, where shall we cast the lot.

So, what would even be the point of hitting some 'innocent' place like Singapore with HAARP-style weaponry?

Even now, the US State Department is floating some damn silly nonsense about people literally pumping the sound of 'Indian crickets' into those embassies to distract attention from what they were really using to knock down a couple of people.

You can't stop them, see.

Singapore - very pretty colored lights at nighttime.

They will go and go and go and they will suck the blood right out of you even while you're still alive.

Because they are simply not accountable. If you don't know something, then just say it: 'I don't know.' But don't manufacture stories (leave that kind of stuff to people like me, please!) in order to have the public believe you are on top of things, and can handle them, and have things 'under control.' 

These guys totally do not have things under control.

And it is going to get worse.

You gotta understand something, right - you fellas in Washington (forget the UK, you people are lost) - if China wants to send a hundred jet planes near, right up near, to Taiwan's face, then you had better wake up to the fact, the fact mind you, that they have already fully compromised places like Singapore, right under your noses.

More pretty colored lights in Singapore
at nighttime.

So yeah Singapore is 'under the gun.' ...If you go by the 'theory' that Washington was severely warned in no uncertain terms in 1967, regarding the further and future use of nuclear weapons, then you had better plan for, 'things happening' where neither you nor 'they' (being the CCP Chinese) have supposed that you were actually vulnerable. And where you are both mucking around with nukes. And that would be Singers.

The trouble is, I guess people really do want the pain and the suffering and the hurt.

Human cultural, folkloric narratives are replete with this kind of thing. But every single time, you get the same band of leaders - well, actually, they're not 'leaders,' they are rulers and overlords, falling for the same stupid trap. There's nothing really all that mysterious, or occult or even 'esoteric' about it: some guy at the top does not have any limits, and he goes and does ten stupid things more than he might have stopped at and gotten away with - and because he is manipulating a huge underlying web of things, when somebody turns on him, like, oh um, a spider bites his leg and he gets sick and weak, then those around him attack him in order to take over themselves. The whole web falls apart because the spider in the middle is not weaving the strands now. And then, that is when the earthquakes and eruptions and lava and magma - and all of that drama - follow.

When did we post this pic here?
Can't remember. I'll have to go back and look...
Wonder why we did that?

What's 'mysterious' about that? Since when ever did such a thing not happen? Right now today there are MEK people conspiring inside Iran, but we can't talk about that because we might set the cat amongst the pigeons there. Right now today... Well, maybe let's not say any more.

Historians have never thought about the relative 'success' of Mao. What they never factor in is that China was not any kind of geopolitical, economic threat to anyone back then. They'd had a dirty war with Japan, and the world was occupied with smashing the Nazis. Stalin and Mao 'got away' because of the particular historical context. Not because they were smart and not because they were right. When people talk about 'false flags' they always want to pin that on the CIA - but the guy who will make that mistake is Xi. Except he doesn't appreciate that the Germans have several lines direct into his bathroom. And they know what his every single next move is.

So. Whatever happens, you have a bunch of people to 'pin it on.' LOL

Sure I'd love it to be the case that super-dooper technology could be provided like people provide parks - everyone goes to them and enjoys them: Muslims wearing cricket gear play English cricket, Sudanese and Senegalese play soccer football, mothers take their li'l kids to the swings and slides and sandpit, angry old men and self-involved young women take their dogs around.

But racehorses, you don't train on these wide open spaces with lots of lush green grass. They get small round lunge yards, and very restricted compounds and narrow training strips...

But when they get onto the big wide open bowling-green racetrack... Well...