The Uncompleted Tower

Wikipedia says the 'Tower of Babel' is an 'origin myth.' And then it even more arrogantly says something like 'purports to explain...'

The Tower of Babel is no myth. 

However, when we look at translations of Genesis 11: 1-9, yes, we do have problems about what it actually 'explains.'

Superficially, it might seem to be an explanation about why people have different languages.

But, when you take a close look at the original language wording, it is not that at all.

The main problems come in the words 'speech' and 'confound.' And then probably also 'the land of the whole world...'

'Haaretz' can certainly mean 'the land' - but what it actually means in spoken language, is 'civilization;' the civilization that owns and controls the land.

So, we are talking in Genesis 11 about 'the civilization of humans.'

'Speech:' - no, not 'speech,' not language, not 'tongue...' The crossing margin between water and dry land, the lip, the embankment, the transition, the interface for exchange.

So we have 'Yahweh Elohim' going down to a place called 'Shinar' (means 'Sumer' and also, 'where the humans were young') - and what does He do? He 'confounds their language, so that they may not understand one another's speech.' That is Genesis 11:7

But what did I say in the last several articles: the human is three distinct things, 'boundaries'/'bounded segments' which are concatenated, by a continuum of 'something' that amasses in any one of three (those particular three boundary 'fields'). But it is critically important which one of the three, the center of gravity forms inside of.

By moving the boundaries, or shifting around the 'embankments,' a characteristic 'persona' is developed, and which is different to what it should naturally be, or maybe let's not say 'naturally,' but optimally.

If the continuum, is like water - then all human beings can exchange that water and flow it inside them and then across to other 'individual units' that is, over to other people, and back again

Now there's no real point people saying all the time - like they and you have seen it in some of the commentary right her - 'there is only one Universal Conscious and we are it' but then, they don't really believe it because as soon as I say, okay give your consciousness up to the ET Aliens (for example) people quickly go 'oh no no, we can't do that!'

Okay how about to Shiva?

The oak is seamless, yes, but is wine
a continuum? Are friends electric?
Thanks Bill! Yum.

The Hindus all lie and say 'ah yes we do that in our meditations.'

Really? Did you give up your University of Calcutta Degrees at the same time then?

What about if the Christians 'die to themselves' and 'empty themselves of their Ego' and become 'possessed' by something that can raise the dead, heal the sick, walk on water, and turn water into wine? At least one of you guys here sends me these bottles of wine... ...so, hey, maybe something's happening there.

Honestly, personally I don't have any 'faith' to go brave the cold water out in the seas right now our here! And anyway 'though shalt not put God to the test.' So I won't. Beauty! Got away with that one!

I don't want to 'lose my consciousness,' my 'awareness' let's say, just to 'prove' some damn silly ancient religious myth!

...Now what actually happens in the myth narrative (let's go with Wiki for the sake of the matter right now), is that Nimrod shoots arrows up into the Heaven/s(?) - he says that he can shoot his arrow into the rainbow which is the thing that encircles the Throne of God.

And then, God don't like that (not sure, maybe He is up there after all, inside the rainbow encircling His throne. Wallahi! Astagfirullah!) and He comes down and messes people up.

Anyway I really wanted to go into why people are not just 'straw in the wind' but we have gone by another route, but heading in the same direction nonetheless.

This 'God' never caused people to have different languages, at least not right away. What He did was shift around the internal goal-posts, as it were. He shifted the banks of what keeps the continuum of human consciousness 'held' in a person such that that person - if the 'pools' were all optimally formulated - is consistent inside with every other person...

And, we are not.

Are we?

Or are we?

If someone said to Joe Biden - give away everything that you have, and give it to the poor, and come follow us and KP as we read 'The Key' by Whitley Strieber - he would laugh! He'd say 'I already have the key boys.'

If someone said to Bernard Arnault of LVMH, 'Bernie, give away half of your billions, so that you could...' He would really laugh!

Today's bows and and arrows. Pretty mean -
same as they always were though.

It is still more important for the Nimrods of today, to shoot arrows up into the rainbows, in order to demonstrate to you how powerful they are, than it is to be nice to other human beings.

So, on the one hand, it doesn't look all that nice of 'God' to come down and mess up the human race back then just because someone was shooting arrows up at Him - but then, what about now?

I don't want to go further than this here. We are getting close to a 'witch hunt' day and age as it is, believe me. You wont necessarily see it obviously just yet because nothing 'bad' has happened just yet.

Well, it has happened, it's just that the media doesn't heard about it yet. And I ain't sayin' because, you know... ...FBI. Believe me. They'll come knocking! LOL

...Unless they have their hands so full.

The Tower of Babel, in any event, was left uncompleted.

And neither Bernard Arnault nor Judge Brenda Penny are wine-makers. Enough said.

Epstein Versus Jay-Z

Today, the latest psychiatric terminology (and the one that is much better) for schizophrenia/multiple personalities is 'Dissociative Identity Disorder.'

This terminology is now shifting away from simply 'personas' or even 'personalities' and towards 'identities.'

An identity is who a person is.

'Brand personas...' Multiple personality
disorder brands! 

The word 'Allah' is a title and a description, not an identity, and not a name. In Urdu, some polytheist can easily say 'such-and-such' a 'god' (so-called 'idol') is the Allah, or is an Allah; even if that is not strictly grammatical from the Arabic in which 'Al Lah' is already saying 'the' something-or-other: 'Alhamdu-li'LAH...' Lah is the effective name of the Arabic 'god.'

Equivalently 'God' is not a name in the English language, but a title that covers a particular description of something.

Every single religion there is - that is, every systematized public form of 'worship activity' and prescriptive belief system, has this persistent idea that when you die (even if it is a 're-incarnation' type of religion, still there is an 'end point' reached) your soul goes to Heaven or to Hell. Buddhism is not quite the same thing because of so much 'process' entailed in the narrative. Even so, it is not clear that the personal individual is anything other than 'one' thing.

You know... ...so -, do multiple personalities go to different places...?

LOL

I have been told by a handful of people running commercial operations that I am not to mention certain things here about this, but that I can sort of 'fence around it.'

So that's what I am doing.

Lenin Versus Jay-Z

What I can tell you without any equivocation at all, is that psychology and science and medicine and religions all have it completely wrong: the Ego is not one simple, amorphous, monolithic thing.

It is, in absolutely every case of the human being, three distinct things, one of which is 'in charge' ultimately of the somatic decisions made by the 'person.'

In modern neuro-science, there is a body of researchers who believe they have substantiated that you can effectively employ something called 'neural de-coding' to ascertain various conditions, even thought patterns - which yes, can be validated using FMRI and also invasive brain implants (internally placed electrodes).

Neural de-coding simply means that sufficient energy is being discharged in the neural networks in the brain, that they create momentum waves out at the cranial surface and the skin. Most current day leading-edge neural de-coders extend this to say that whole muscle structures as well as a number of other parasympathetic nerve pathways are steered into particular observable patterns.

One example is the face of Jay-Z. Neural de-coders will assert that this person is not as consciously awake or aware as you might suppose...

Not 'Jay-Z' - and much more aware than you know!

But it goes even further than this - an animal in the sun is also not 'fully consciously awake or aware' either but it has atavistic impulses still highly active. And I can say no more about it than that.

To play chess very well, you not only need to have a good 'move retentive memory - forward as well as backward' but you need to 'see ahead.'

The human brain being as powerful as it is, could Jay-Z play chess? Well yes he might be able to. Could he compete with a master? Not at all.

Not ever? Not ever ever.

The atavistic Ego formation is stuck in the driver's seat there.

To succeed at chess the atavistic Ego one-third is there, but held back in reserve after another part of the tripartite Ego formation has actually played the moves first...

Now I'm not supposed to go on with this any further but I can tell you, that a neural de-coder will certainly pose the question, when you think you are looking at 'Jeffrey Epstein' are you sure you know what you are looking at...

You - your personality and your actual 'I,' your 'Ego' - is a concatenation of three separate and distinct 'whole things' in and through which a 'center of gravity' of 'something else again' goes in and 'takes a position.'

Still not 'Jay-Z' and anyway, I am not going to
post a pic of 'Jay-Z.'

This is something you can completely prove with FMRI scanning. The default blood flow always goes to only one of three distinct regions and network structures with well-known functions.

Do you know how much that one piece of information is worth in a practical sense, if you knew what to do with it?

LOL

If you knew what someone's default position was all the time - just from looking at them -  marketing companies would be interested.

Don't waste your time trying to work this out on your own - it has defied the whole of human society, all the religions, all of politics, and all of science for ten thousand years.

You have ten billion dollars - one million for each thousand years (is that right, yeah I think it is...) humans never knew this or worked it out - and I will tell you.

You are just a carbon based life-form. Don't ever forget that.

Why Not

It isn't that you cannot, but that you should not... ....because,

you will simply be feeding a monster.

There are whole industries - not just an industry, but many of them - that go into long and complicated ideas about human personality. Some talk about 'colors reflecting personality types,' others deal with 'data graphics' in order to design branding schemes, others are heavily tied up with academic studies such as Myers-Briggs and Holland Codes (which is a theory about career choice).

Miriam Lancewood - a young
Dutch woman who with her English
husband live 'wild' in New Zealand,
I believe.

There are 'communication styles,' and there are 'personality tests' - and most of it now has academic approval.

And this is of course, due to big business paying money out to try and grab the holy grail, as it were, of customer and consumer access and capture.

Like I said - I can easily, and I mean easily - force someone to do something they might not have thought they were going to do, or were even likely to do, especially when it comes to money, for one good example.

But when you do that kind of thing what you are effectively doing is throwing that person under a bus they are themselves errant in driving at all in the first place, to say nothing of when they drive it too fast.

If you just apply cold objective common sense to the 'labels' that are attached to ideas like 'color wheels and personality' what you could as easily conclude as you might 'conclude' that the words do apply appropriately - is that they apply anyway because they would do so at various intervals no matter what. The most self-involved, introvert person could in particular given circumstances, be a lion! ...As always happens in hot wars; it's a maxim. The loudest, noisiest, most self-aggrandizing bully is always the biggest coward when confronted with an obviously more serious and real threat than they themselves are at the given moment of challenge.

'Red' is aggressive - but why isn't 'pink' aggressive? Well, it actually is!

It's all about how you think about something.

Miriam is 'cute' but she is also potentially deadly
dangerous and obsessional.

So, if I go back to the 'white room,' scanning is looking at what someone is generally, or most automatically 'defaulting' to, when they are looking at anything.

Now I'm not going any further, or more deeply into this here because it becomes stupendously significant, beyond this point; as soon as you 'see' what the system or structure is, it changes a lot of things - none of which I want to be responsible for changing. I am not a prophet to Mankind - I am the undertaker to it.

I'm not saving anyone.

If you're smart enough you'll be quite able to save yourself anyway.

But I will tell you about a problem that is already here, not just 'coming up soon.'

The Plague of Sheroe (627 AD - 628 AD) killed off fifty per cent of the population of the Western Sassanid Empire. But... ...or maybe and - it killed the ruler.

The Sassanids self-destructed virtually immediately thereafter and the mercenary or 'client' armies they had been previously arming with expensive weaponry, jumped into the power vacuum, rampaging everywhere and looting and vandalizing everything from which the developed world never recovered not for a thousand years.

How to be wild and deadly dangerous
in the city...

The whole of Egypt was plundered and wrecked, Ctesiphon and Baghdad too, and the need for further, in fact continuous plunder to feed this hungry and not self-sufficient monster saw the expansion of it all the way to Spain.

On-line, there are hundreds, no, thousands and thousands, of pages of details about 'strategy' and 'battles' and even named individuals and places - none of whom or which ever existed in history.

All of these on-line reference sources will have a little phrase tucked in there somewhere, that says: 'these details are principally from Islamic tradition.' 

In fact, that 'Islamic tradition' comes from only one man, ibn Hisham, who wrote a recension (supposedly of an earlier text, not one single copy of which exists at all, nor even any fragments therefrom...) more than two hundred years after the various 'historical' episodes themselves, for which there is in fact, no history at all; as in 'absolutely zero.'

The 'Pact of Umar' (copy document) is an obvious forgery made hundreds of years after it was meant to have been made/signed, and there are no indications by anyone at the time that such a thing occurred.

Plagues - real ones - have the uniform habit of killing off the leaders, and altering the political and economic prevailing structures and doing so with effects felt for hundreds of years.

Conspiracy theorists could say, oh this one we're having is not a real plague - but yes it is and I'll tell you why: it has already altered the economic and social/political structures that had been in force.

Animal in the wild...

Superficially, it would seem that because of modern medicine and technology, leaderships are capable of protecting themselves relatively successfully, in the face of a global viral pandemic.

Scenario modelers however, using sophisticated 'data-graphics' will tell you a different story. 

They will say, that some critical structural girders underpinning why those leaders even existed in the first place have already been removed - weakening the whole system.

Buildings exhibit lots of problems over some time before they just completely collapse altogether under their own weight, if they are no longer structurally sound.

Isn't that right?

Eric Weinstein, who raised the basic alarm about the media's treatment of the Epstein business, shone a light onto a basic fact regarding the whole 'Epstein model' - which is that little did we the ordinary public know or realize, that arms of government, the powers of the state, were being used to compromise people, and especially public figures, for a long time.

Well what you also don't know is that right now, there are small groups of people who are going to take politicians, judges, lawyers, 'activists,' bankers, police, 'secret police' out under the cover of darkness - and skin them alive and present the hides to you. (I should say 'in ways that you might not expect could happen' - you know, so that the cops don't come knocking on my door).

You think not?

Are you betting? And do you have enough money to lose?

POSTSCRIPT. I just had this video come through my YT feed for no reason that I can think of - it was just in with a bunch of other general TV interviews, but this one was one of Caitlyn Jenner, in which Jenner mentions that there was one single idea going through the head for forty years, every single day, all the time. So, that's a good example of what I'm talking about. Stick such a person into a totally somnolent state, shutting down their incessant verbal explaining about things they are actually lying to you about - and you can use EMF scanning technology and 'read' the neural network pathways that are heavily used. ...I can explain to Jenner what was going on - and what still is going on - but I don't need to do that; no one has asked me to, and I might not anyway. The fact that a human being is mys-organized inside is no crime of that person's. Super advanced cultures and species are so far above what the human paradigm is though, that 'agency' on behalf of the flawed human being is nonsensical as an absolute principal. Humans are mediocre things at best as an 'average' of the whole group (of 'humans'). Jenner's conclusions appears to be something along the lines of 'being true to oneself...' What does that even mean though? 'Oneself?' Oneself who? He wasn't 'himself' the whole of his life but even in this interview he openly claims to have been 'successful' in having raised his kids and in acquitting a range of other... ...social expectations. ...It's totally possible to make someone happy, though, just by reading what their inward neural inclinations are all the time - and the mistake people make is in thinking this is from something outside of themselves, something put upon them; in fact it's who they are. The only choice you get when you die, is - do you want to be who you claimed to have been? LOL 

Davin R, Hawkins says that; I'm just repeating it. I don't know anything. 

 

Complicated, But We'll Try

This is another one of these situations where as soon as you mention it, then people will all go 'yeah we knew.'

(I try to make these short - but hell, this is into the intense stuff now!).

And, the knowledge will alter the course and direction of something, at least, substantially different to the present direction of things.

Where AI research and even development will get it all wrong, is in this idea they are all on right now (and you're not going to see them shift themselves off the path) - that is depicting 'the brain' and 'consciousness' and 'intelligence' as oriented towards 'body-object interaction.' (They mean body to object...). It's termed, in the scientific communities that are involved: 'body-object interaction.'

The gestures of Nature...

How they came to this conclusion is that the present status of actual hard research can factually show that the blood flows in the human brain, go to discrete regions and specific areas, for specific word-ideas (EG 'old man,' 'throws,' 'stone' 'lake). Studies have been conducted using FMRI, in which there is a greater than 85% accuracy of the interpreting by a computer, of such blood flows, across a large, a really large, selection of languages (IE different actual words) but using the same meanings, obviously. 

So because it appears (and likely is to a great extent, the case) that a computer can 'read' what someone is 'saying' or thinking in their brain, regardless of which language they are using - this has steered the thinking on AI down the path of semantics and that the 'human being' is located in their brain, and in the neural networks up there, as a direct reflection of motor action, and object interaction, plus desires and aversions.

So...

If we were to say 'oh okay so-and-so is really the case' and then describe and show how and why, then all of a sudden, if this works its way out into the general discussion and debate, sooner or later the current pathway will change.

And I don't want that to happen. I am a strong advocate of AI. And I am at the same time a strong advocate of the fact that humans are bound to FIU and FUBAR, too.

The white room has a subject individual in a state where there is only 'white' as the sensory input baseline. What this does is high-light the 'grooved in' neural network pathways - especially, as long as you know what you are looking for, those to do with more or less obsessional thinking and thinking that is flawed, but nonetheless, obsessive.

They say 'color-personality' but
I don't believe it.

'Flawed' here, will be those brain neural patterns, that have cut off 1. affective/effective pathways, and 2. cut off or diverted sensory signals.

The Wikipedia does not have any entry for 'mys-osmia.' It has 'anosmia,' 'hyposmia,' 'hyperosmia,' and 'parosmia.' Parosmia is the closest to mysosmia. Parosmia is a persistent false belief about certain things giving off a bad odor.

Medical science today too, does not have a standard concept (or really, any conception at all) that there is a condition that should be termed 'mysosmia.' 'Misos' means hatred in Greek, so we are not really talking about that; we are talking about 'mysos' which means mixed up, heterogeneous, and with incompatible parts attempted to be mixed in. Now don't try and go look it up and come back with what the broad modern version of 'mysos' is - that is wrong.

'Mysos' means incorrectly mixed.

Plainly though, people suffering even from what is called 'parosmia' are getting incorrect - IE false - signals via their neurology.

This condition is a well-known attendant to certain pathological states like schizophrenia (or the current terminology for the same thing), or bi-polar disorders, or amphetamine and heroin addiction materially/organically very adverse conditions.

Consequently, you should be able to guess, that 'consciousness' and the human individual persona is actually not just located entirely in the brain (in fact it is not 'located' there at all, but we won't go into it here) - but has a diffused arrangement through actual organic features and cellular and organic interactions.

Two spoiled brats. I met one of them.

Humans have two major signalling infrastructures: the hormonal ones, and the neural (nerve) network system.

Hormones are molecular signalling things that give the active dynamic functioning body, signals between the organs and the cells there and around there, related to the 'optimum function' directive in (also 'of') the whole organism.

Nerves convey affective and effective signals to and from muscles, and to a certain extent from the joints as well.

Nerves also convey information to and from the largest organ of the body - the skin - as well as to the sustentacular cells. Also the auditory canals and eyes and so on.

But the question is raised now, if an individual's brain flow habituation, is for always cutting across or cutting off the optimum performance and function of the whole being -, IE its living body - is that something in fact, that the inner person intends?

So where is this 'inner person' and how did they come to be 'there' and what, actually, are they even - at all?

If we go to Veda knowledge, we see the apparent hypothesis there that there is a totally objective 'knower' which is Universal Cosmic Krsna, or Vishnu, or Shiva. In the Vedas, according to the modern interpretations of the religious Hindus/Vaishnavas, there is the ultimate proposition that everyone merely 'goes back' to Krsna and that 'we' were only being lent to us anyway, in our lifetimes! At the same time, this is actually not what the Vedas actually say at all. 

This 'Vaishnavism' is in fact atheistic - it is the same mish-mash nonsense that obtains in the Western religions, but it is here in the Eastern one.

However, what is able to be drawn from this Veda teaching, is that there is a neutral, objective knower; and that is all, in fact, that the Vedas say.

The 'persona' though, is neither objective nor neutral.

Now I am able to stick something down in front of an individual, having observed them a little, and working out various things about them - and have them pick that thing up 100% of the time without saying anything at all. It is also possible, to have a bank manager give you a grossly illegal 'non-recourse loan' of a lot of money, and not say anything at all to them, not hold a gun to their face or anything like that, and have them obsess all day long as to how to give it to you.

This is all very interesting of course and you don't believe me. Because, how come I don't do that then? Right?

However let's look at a large commercial organization that is about to market a new product.

Karl Popper, as I have mentioned here before, produced this 'falsifiability template' for science - and in so doing, he altered actual 'science' as it is found around today.

If that 'large commercial organization' employed a Popper-grounded modern science graduate, they would fail eventually, or at some certain point - essentially because they are not using actual science, but Karl Popper-science; which is not only wrong, but maliciously so.

Popper 'science' uses the commodity value of authority, not the commoditized value of function.

The notion that '21 black crows' is a basis for 'falsifiability' since it retains the open possibility of the next crow being white - is a false piece of logic. But it is what all of current science is built upon.

A 'white crow...' is not a crow.

Crows pecking each other's eyes out...

If you were to ask a European in the old old days - what color are swans? They should answer you that 'swans are white.' And then, if you were to ask an Australian Aboriginal the same question they should answer you: 'swans are black.'

Well they are neither black nor white; swans are both black and white. Even John McAfee 'bequeathed' that item of Boolean programming 'gold' to the kids just before he apparently, died.

There is no such thing as ' a black swan event.' Such a thing is just another 'swan event;' just another 'event.'

Boeing built planes on the 'authority' of Popper science - and people paid the price with their lives.

You keep on betting that it cannot be done what I just said can be done, with your customer, and you will keep losing your shirt. So - keep doing that.

As far as making money is concerned, I would simply pick one person or a few of the same kind, and take their money off them. Simple as that. I don't need to talk to a committee, or a board of idiots trying to build the 'camel.'

Next post, we will take a case example, and employ Alien tactics and strategies, and see where it leads us.

The White Room

Professor John Mack was a well-known American psychiatrist who published a book in 1994 - 'Abduction.' The titles of these kinds of books are often dictated to the writers by agents and publishing houses who have an eye to selling books. 

Mack had already won the Pulitzer Prize way back in 1977 for a book about Thomas Lawrence.

Mack can still be seen on-line in his interview by Charlie Rose (no comment... lol. But he's a good man, Charlie, our Charlie).

Mack began a decade-long research study into Alien abduction scenarios as presented by subjects who had not exactly presented from psychiatric situations but who had emerged in various ways into his psychiatric field.

John Mack in the Charlie Rose interview.

Mack was a Harvard Medical School personage of some considerable weight, even though at one point there was a 'secret committee' of other academics that wanted to censure his work on these 'Alien abductee cases' - or possible/potential cases.

Now I won't go into the possibility that Mack was receiving help and support from covert official agencies but he was - he interviewed Edward Teller for some joint work with other major scientists on a kind of a 'wrap' on the nuclear bomb. However, anywhere you go into 'looking back' at the nuclear bomb you will encounter covert units that exist and are fully intact up until this second.

Oops, next second too. How 'bout that.

Anyway.

'The white room' was one of several key elements of apparent possible abductee cases.

If we can just step around all the facade of what Mack's research was about, you know, how that he was 'just' motivated by his own curiosity, not to say that he was not all of that too; and how it was 'independent.' There are listed filters that covert units apply - nowadays because of the data acquisition and analysis that could emerge from John Mack's work - on people's stories and describing of particular events, to decide whether or not someone is in the cohort of 'authentic' contact persons.

So - you can realize that too early public mentioning of things like the 'white room' will certainly mean that people will simply 'lift' the element and drop it into their own account about something 'unusual' and then it will 'fit in' to the profile. 

Best kind of thing I could find on-line. Leave out the
funny 'designs' at the pedestal area of the raised
floor sections. No raised, or lowered floor sections, smaller
computer screens. Not so much curvature.
More 'whiteness/brightness').

The 'white room' is already out there in the public space and it is not the only thing that is common among those with let's say 'possibly' authentic experiences/encounters. 

In the past when no one knew about it, it was a tell-tale marker to start treating that individual 'level up' as they say. I am not damaging anything talking about it now. I don't think. Besides there are other ways to tell (if someone should be regarded as 'authentic').

Human industrial so-called 'clean rooms' do not really describe an ET Alien first entry area 'white room.' (Human) industrial clean rooms are intended to test machinery and equipment - so they can have inside them, things like smoke alarms and fire extinguishers and a lot of little things that a human being will look at, observe, notice, and then from there their mind will start automatically moving into speculative thoughts instigated but these things.

A 'white room' is a completely known space; like say a kitchen or galley area, with a few very ordinary items of furniture and features - table, chairs, maybe even a door or a turned off computer screen.

Scanning technology is then used to 'see' into the human being subject individual - which examines what the person is generating on their own without visual or any other stimulus above a base threshold level of nervous energy. And from those readings, the individual can be and is, matched with other people who have the same nervous energy structures.

Pod groups of these individuals are then created and developed over time. Nobody fails to interact positively with the other pod group members because they are all essentially internally 'tuned' the same way as it were.

When people are returned back to their human environment, they report this experience of the white room.

This whole fairy tale about 'putting subjects into a calm hypnotic condition to retrieve deeply placed memories, or traumatic memories' is rubbish. It was and still is one of the things that those covert units whose responsibility it is to look into nuclear security matters, use to try and get out what was clearly coming up via Mack's research, that certain pod groups were being given instructions that were to be held absolutely secret and away from the rest of human people who were not already in those particular pod groups or who did not have the apparent 'clearances.'

Which there are said to be, clearances codes. This was reported actually by the subjects themselves quite openly.

What's their cunning li'l plan? What are they gonna do? Where are they all headed? ...Me, I'm headed right now for another black coffee.

Actually I should add something to this. Human beings are incredibly complicated, complex creatures inside, as you know, but they are a lot different to what you might suppose, and different to the way society, especially modern society attempts to present them (us? lol). This is probably something we could profitably discuss much more and at greater depth and certainly, we can extract things from the 'less public' 'research' material, let's call it that - which will give indications of what the scanners are looking for 'up there' and how to heuristically locate certain key indicators in human subjects, even without a lot of sophisticated equipment. These things 'could' have enormous commercial value but to hell with that. Let's just talk about it - because! Just because, that's why because.

People look like one thing when they 'package' themselves here in society, and they are a whole lot more inside...

This audio contains what I was mentioning previously somewhere - micro-polyphony: