Okay so we're doing a 'prospective project' right now. And it's A BIG BIG SECRET. So I caint talks 'bout it, dudes. You know, and I'm sure that you do know, there are a few slight problems now and again with the ethics of any spying agency. I mean if it gets serious, are we really going to shoot someone? Hell I don't know; I'm not in one of those outfits. But you know what I mean - hypothetically... I will tell you this much - I can tell you this much and it isn't really deceptive or misleading or any kind of misdirection: sometimes, governments that we are all participating in, here in the Western world, require a public gloss, or some means of propaganda to change the baying for blood that might be going on and which might be ill-informed... ...AS FAR AS THE AUTHORITIES ARE CONCERNED. Soon, Maxwell will be coming out into the glare of daylight, to answer some carefully framed questions.
Now all you guys have to pay attention, right? Because this is important. And the very next article I post here, assuming no one gets assassinated or that asteroid doesn't impact in the meantime tonight... ...will relate directly to what you are about to witness, and that you should take something from and retain in your consciousness somewhere:
Yesterday, '60 Minutes' - a major television current affairs program in Australia - ran the story about one 'Wang Liqiang,' a Chinese spy who has told the Australian secret intelligence agency ASIO, that the Beijing government has hit squads out around the world, has ordered assassinations in the past, even here in Australia. Now that was interesting timing, because my sources for this story have no connection whatsoever either to any media organisation, and especially not to a government propaganda arm like '60 Minutes.'
Wang Liqiang
So what was this? An attempt to 'get the story out officially' in order to 'control the narrative,' as they say - since it must have been clear that there were numerous intelligence agencies around the world who knew about it and were drifting the story out themselves already. Ah well. Who cares? Not me. It's up to them to see if they can control either the narrative, or the actuality of hit squads out there!! ...Which they won't be able to and I've already said Xi is a nutcase. So... What a * mess, is what 'so.' Serves them all bloody right. Xi is a nutcase... ...but some of these clowns in governments and intelligence agencies around the world are sheerly stupid. And stupid is worse. By far.
There's stuff going on behind the scenes that would make your hair truly curl, if you knew.
Everyone's looking at the location of where the ball should be that their attention has been directed at.
You know you'd do a lot better to just switch it all off and look somewhere else where no one is expecting there to be any 'action.'
Lovely scene, stupid movie. '6 Underground.'
Ostensibly, it would appear that Washington leaks and that even the CIA leaks at certain levels and over certain political matters. But that would presume to say that both the CIA and 'Washington' actually 'know' anything in the first place. You know, anything truly significant.
I have never made any secret that I look askance at today's UK intelligence services and the academic thinking that is behind all of it there these days. So they're not paying me any money now are they. So I won't be volunteering anything to that crowd.
The Australians are too small fry in the whole scheme of things so I won't be volunteering anything to them either and they're not asking and not likely to be asking; certainly not me, anyway.
Bluntly I will tell you that Moscow is very Moscow-interest-centric and they don't have any fixed agenda as far as I know in the area I am talking about.
...But I think the Chinese government has hit squads out in the world somewhere right now. And I don't mean in Hong Kong.
$150 million California mansion - safe from China money hit-squads
God only knows - seriously, god only knows - what the governments in the West are going to do when this all hits the public square. Because it will. We are all in for a big helluva showground ride now. Xi is a fucking lunatic and he is already out of control. And who's going to stop him? The New York Times? Are they going to be able to?
Oh believe you me, he has the plan all right. Whether he pulls the trigger on it a touch 'too soon' and therefore gets called for starting the trouble himself is moot but only just for these next few seconds, days, or weeks. I don't think he can resist. And you're going to see a lot of slack jaws afterwards. All the big-heads with the big talk are going to be put to the test of their own intestinal fortitude. Will we go to war with China? Let's see it. Big trouble in Chinatown. Coming soon.
So this very close associate, family member (what of it still exists! LOL) says to me the day before yesterday: 'Calvin, at our age, we have just one run at it left." W-a-a-a?! I said - Whaaaaaaat?! So I quickly resorted to some old cricketing parlance - 'Nah, we are the nightwatchmen here. We are batting till morning and after as well. We're winning this game, dude!'
One of the greatest 'thought experiments' ever made was by a gentleman of the 10th Century, Abu Ali Sina, widely regarded as one of the most significant physicians, philosophers, astronomers, and writers of all time. He devised the 'floating man' thought experiment through which he deduced the nature of the human soul - and I must add, the actual texts that he wrote about this are all largely obscured from examination these days and all we are left with is a summary and a distillation of what he wrote. Most Muslims - even the most highly trained modern Islamic literature and religious belief scholars are ignorant of the real understanding behind what is presently repeated as 'Qul huwallahu ahad' which is supposedly directly from the Quran. Well look, nobody knows exactly WHAT the rendering of the symbols in there really ought to be in the modern world because there are no grammar points available in the original source texts from the ancient world - which were made from a sound, IE aural/oral recitation from someone's memory only. ...Other than the explanations from great scholars like Abu Ali Sina. Abu Ali Sina, however, explains it thus... 'mahiyya, wujud, WAHID AHAD.' No essence other than its own existence, and unique. UNIQUE - 'wahid' + 'ahad;' it is 'One of' 'One.' The present-day rendering of the Quran that most people say, makes it appear that 'God' is 'one of...' But nothing else. One of what then, exactly? They don't understand that the verse really says and intends to convey uniqueness - exactly as Abu Ali Sina outlines.
Abu Ali Sina
Abu Ali Sina was moreover, not exactly a Muslim in the present-day sense of the word, and the Emir at the time where he lived tried variously to dispose of him, although he had to keep relenting when he himself - the Emir - fell ill and required the services of this great doctor. At the same time it is clear from historical accounts, that Abu Ali Sina practiced Islamic religious rituals and praying and he was an expert in Islamic textual recitation and jurisprudence. Abu Ali Sina is an occult figure, by which I mean to tell you that there is considerable mystery in open records about him and his life - he was trained by some 'roaming healer' whose name is never given, and apparently, his mind was next opened to the mysteries of metaphysics from reading a book by al-Farabi that he purchased for the tiny sum at the time (for these sorts of books) of three dirhams. Abu Ali Sina was regarded by Bacon and Newton and the Earl of Oxford as having scientifically demonstrated both the existence of God, and of the human soul... These 'proofs' exist today but are never talked about at Universities. Abu Ali Sina's works on this matter are written as mathematical 'proofs' and not simply 'arguments' but they are referred to in common sources - by those who have never actually read them - as 'arguments.' And this is a quite deliberate and malicious deceit. Even during the lifetime of Abu Ali Sina, major library sources for his studies were burned by those who opposed his ideas - because a wider exposure of them would have undermined their political standing and power.
And so, we have an example of the narrow gate. What did Abu Ali Sina know, that most of the rest of the whole world did not... As we all get older, we assume that we have a lesser chance to 'make it' materially speaking. Whereas in fact - and since no one really knows that we are the Abu Ali Sina's of our day - we have the knowledge, the power, the capacities and real status of esteemed physicians (by any who really wish to be cured), the mathematics, the dynamic mind, to procure material wealth; but we also can make the necessary transition from the banal and simplistic, to the sophisticated and 'un-Earthly' at which point we also have to place a 'cover' or cloak across our activities and knowledge, for fear of being presumed witches and sorcerers!
