So, Silver

What did we say here?

'Silver Dirham' - a relatively new oud-based perfume;
pretty decent too. Shame there's no 'nitro-musk' in it. NM was banned
by the European IFRA regulators and so you can only get Nitro Musk
in Middle Eastern and Indian fragrances these days. Shame... ...because you
can really blow up planes and buildings and back-packs and stuff with Brut 33 original,
if you know how to remove one or two of the added carbon atoms in the base molecule.

'Silver to rise soon.' Was the label attached to our Wednesday, 3 July article: 'Started This Silver Fund.' Price then was around and sometimes even less than 15 bucks in Aussie dollars which have since slipped even further, as the GBP slides freely.

So what are we going to do? It's in a profit and you never go broke taking a profit (or so old Geoff Cambridge, my most ancient stock broker mentor used to say).

And part of the design of what we are doing here is getting a digital utility token off the ground, backed by various hard value and liquid components. Silver being one of them at the moment.

We can sell some, and we can buy some more, too - because, we have a stream of money from elsewhere and right now I am unable to think of anything better to spend the cash into.

What do you guys think? We've made about 30% all told, inclusive of the currency movements - in less than sixty days.

How Long More For The New Technology

See, some of the stuff I would tell you, does not 'comply' with standard modern folklore - even though that 'folklore' has absolutely zero historical authenticity whatsoever...

I know that a lot of people do 'believe' in the standard current 'space drama' narrative about there literally being 'fallen angels' or something, who led everyone on Earth astray - I mean this is, generally speaking, the actual underlying 'theistic nature of Evil' belief structure of more or less ALL of modern Western Christian, um, eschatology(?), would you call it that; probably yep.

Anyway, 'Haram' means 'forbidden' and 'Amon' means 'hidden - and so 'Hermon' (as in 'Mount Hermon') means 'forbidden and hidden.'

What does this do...?
- What does it actually, do.

'Forbidden' means you can't go there; or you're not supposed to go there unless invited and accompanied by some knowledgeable 'guide.' 'Hidden' means you're not going to 'find it' anyway, if you go looking on your own.

It doesn't mean it is bad, or it is a bad place or that there are bad beings there.

Masjid al Haram is simply the Great Mosque in Mecca.

The Book of Jude - which references this infamous damn 'Book of Enoch' specifies what beings are bad, and it doesn't say 'fallen angels' or anything about 'fallen angels.'

And so if you are in that mob that thinks there was ever a 'deal' done between super-advanced but evil 'ET aliens' and the US government or even the Russian government as well, to hand over some 'advanced technology' just so that 'they' (the space invaders) can keep some live humans underground somewhere and suck their blood or something, just forget it; it's idiotic nonsense.

What is not nonsense, is that the human race has benefited from some quite remarkable leaps forward in technology over the last few hundred years, and with an increasing surge over the immediate last fifty years or so. And these leaps have definitely altered the entire 'way' of the human race, virtually across the entire planet.

But have we just now also seen a slowing, maybe even a sudden grinding halt...?

Are people becoming bored with what was at first the novelty of iPads and iPhones, and the internet?

And what does this do?
Is it coming soon? Can we have it?

Are these things failing to deliver on whatever it was people thought 'they' (the 'things,' the technology) promised?

Yes.

And so we will now begin to see the decline and fall of edifices raised up on the promise of what technology could supposedly deliver.

These 'edifices' are social, and cultural, and economic.

...But there is still new technology yet to come.

You will get it. At least you will if you stay around here, and watch and think carefully.

And you will survive and thrive through the mess that is now starting to brew and will soon enough spill over into - well, into everything and into everywhere.

'Fallen angels,' eh. I think not.

The Book of Jude specifies who the problem is.






   

Al Uqsur

Al Uqsur is the Egyptian for what we today call 'Luxor.'

Luxor is in Thebes, and is the place at which Plato said Hermes founded his city, and provided Mankind with the necessary modern ideas for it to establish actual 'civilization.' 

If you search 'the Courtyard of the Kings' in virtually all the search engines, they will take you the 'Temple of Ramses.' And this is not actually 'the Courtyard of the Kings.' ...And this is just the beginning of the deceptions that will be offered to you by so-called 'scholars' and historians, mostly modern, but certainly including some old ones as well from thousands of years ago.

Courtyard of the Kings

There is a problem about Egypt of course, namely, we simply have inadequate, or highly unreliable 'information' of its true history.

As far as the relatively uncontested narrative is concerned dating to authentic Egyptian inscriptions, the god Amun, established Al Uqsur - 'Amun' meaning 'the hidden god.'

In terms of comparative accounts, the Hebrews supposed that certain 'heavenly' identities were present on Mount Hermon, and they did all kinds of things, mostly not that good according to the Masoretic traditions. The ancient Greeks also held a similar version of the story, and they too, suggested there was a group of such beings who established their dwellings in a mountain in Syria, but then, some titanic maleficent force turned up threatening to literally destroy them - as in kill; even 'the gods...' And consequently, they 'hid' themselves in artificial mountains in Egypt, disguising themselves as forms of terrestrial animals, the leader of which was an eagle.

Now...

Strangely enough, you will find this same account in the Christian Bible, except it is almost never underscored that there was an antecedent account, that we today call 'mythology.'

You see, the words used are the same words: 'eagle,' 'uqsur,' 'temenos,' 'oiketerion.'

'Uqsur' means a palace, but 'al uqsur' has the implication of a grouping of palaces. 

The Temple of Hatshepsut

Now how is it actually possible to 'kill a god' - a being who presumably, by very definition, is eternal and cannot 'die.' Well, the titanic being seeking to 'kill' them, was itself something from out of some indescribable place before time itself began ('primordial') - or at least, this was how it was 'billed.'

The leader of the gods in these accounts, sought the advice of some other 'ultimate' divine identities - the Moirai - who assisted him to vanquish the titanic entity. It is literally the case, that the primordial being, is chaos - a preternatural force that is not constrained to behave according to physics, to laws, to nature, to predictability along any set rules at all; it does not obey 'the gods.'

It is part of hypothetical existential 'thoughts' in that it is, the opposite of all things.

Is it really possible to destroy, 'the (theoretical) opposite of all things?'

You can constrain it. I have not yet seen a logical proof to any surmise that it can be fully destroyed.

L'uqsur-fer...' ...means, assistant in the palaces.

There is nobody anywhere in any 'lodge,' masonic hall, or secret conclave of the Illuminati, who will tell you that.

It is difficult, I understand, to get good help these days.

There is literally no point telling Rabbinical scholars that 'malak,' or 'melek' does not mean 'angel' or 'king' - 'm'el-aig(yptos)....' Because they know better, don't they. I mean it's their language, isn't it.

Winged, as an eagle. Divine, of the 'Els.'

'M' just means '(hu)man.'

King is 'ji-n-si-b-ijwys-t.' 'N' is 'of' and 'b' is 'and' and 't' is 'all.' And that is on ALL the hieroglyphics. And that is not disputed by anyone; but they never talk about it either.

MAKS 2019

We have a couple of friends who are attending this year's 'MAKS' - aka 'The International Aviation and Space Salon' just a few kilometers south of Moscow.

The Russians don't refer to it as a 'show' or 'air show' but as a 'salon.' It's partly an equipment and aviation products marketing platform; hence there are intended to be plenty of 'sales.' Oddly enough, the same word is used in France for what were once 'private rooms' in which displaced European aristocrats entertained the arts communities.

SU-57 (I think this is probably a CGI pic)

Not sure if there was anything in the form of 'sales' going on there in Paris of a hundred years ago...

The 2019 MAKS salon finishes this Sunday, 1st of September.

There were some outstanding aerobatics displays once again and for me at least, I thought I saw some completely new maneuvers presented for the first time. This whole thing about the Russian jets being able to fly backwards and float around seemingly suspended in the air and also conduct flat spins has been taken to new levels.

There's some pretty nice aerospace and aviation technology on-line right now, be it from the USA or Russia. The technology from both of those sources is remarkably similar... ...almost 'harmonized' you might say. Although I shouldn't say that because the criminal media wants everyone to forget the space and airspace safety and security co-operation agreements between the two super powers. As if they didn't exist.

Number, and Craft

This is one of the most important things any practical economist requires to know about the modern world.

'Number, and Craft.'

These subject headings are the very basis of science. 

Ignorantly, young people assume that science is some fact of eternal existence, or that being so in fact existential and real, that clever humans (the clever ones, at least) more or less always employed some form of it, and that we, in today's world, are so outstandingly clever and possessed of such amazing instruments, that we are the premier scientists and that this is the Age of Science.

Because of the subject matter in the painting, a lot of people
think this is Camillo Agrippa, but it is his contemporary,
Luca Pacioli, more or less the inventor of modern accounting.

It might be the Age of Science; it is also the Age of Abject Stupidity.

There is nothing valuable about 'science.'

You see, there has always been a hint of a dispute between the thinkers of the 'Austrian Circle' and those who emerged from the very Renaissance itself. Thus, we have what all of modern academia calls 'the Zilsel Thesis' - which holds that the aristocratic layer that housed the abstract and rational purist thinkers, came together with the craft workshops in Italy and Spain and Poland and Germany, in the Renaissance, which practiced rule-of-thumb habits following basic experimentation; and then these two bodies of human endeavor when joined, led to 'science.'

...And, by contrast, we have the position enunciated by Camillo Agrippa, the world's greatest fencing master and (fencing) thinker who ever lived.

Agrippa maintained that number and space and time existed objectively, and that the combinations of number in space, and number in time, produced 'motion' and all perfect motion was beautiful, and decisive.

This is Spanish bespoke - the Spanish cut is quite distinct from the
various Italian, as well as the closer Parisian lines. Spanish bespoke has maintained
a closer tie to its Renaissance heart and roots.

Agrippa never needed to doubt that 2 + 2 = 4 whereas Karl Popper (not actually ever a member of the Austrian Circle) spent the whole of his life doubting it and at the same time suggesting it couldn't be proven nor could it be falsified and therefore it was not a scientific thing.

Eow-kayyyy.

Agrippa lived during a time at which it was possible to 'wear swords' and thus, he composed a vast treatise on 'the wearing sword.'

Bruce Lee never needed to wear a sword. And he was aware of Agrippa and spoke about him.

710bhp F8 Tributo - science or Renaissance art?

See that kids? You don't know anything.

You watch the Hollywood movies with the little old grey or green guy who 'raises rocks with The Force,' but you cannot do that yourself and you don't even think it can be done for real.

Yeah it can.