'Number, and Craft.'
These subject headings are the very basis of science.
Ignorantly, young people assume that science is some fact of eternal existence, or that being so in fact existential and real, that clever humans (the clever ones, at least) more or less always employed some form of it, and that we, in today's world, are so outstandingly clever and possessed of such amazing instruments, that we are the premier scientists and that this is the Age of Science.
Because of the subject matter in the painting, a lot of people think this is Camillo Agrippa, but it is his contemporary, Luca Pacioli, more or less the inventor of modern accounting. |
It might be the Age of Science; it is also the Age of Abject Stupidity.
There is nothing valuable about 'science.'
You see, there has always been a hint of a dispute between the thinkers of the 'Austrian Circle' and those who emerged from the very Renaissance itself. Thus, we have what all of modern academia calls 'the Zilsel Thesis' - which holds that the aristocratic layer that housed the abstract and rational purist thinkers, came together with the craft workshops in Italy and Spain and Poland and Germany, in the Renaissance, which practiced rule-of-thumb habits following basic experimentation; and then these two bodies of human endeavor when joined, led to 'science.'
...And, by contrast, we have the position enunciated by Camillo Agrippa, the world's greatest fencing master and (fencing) thinker who ever lived.
Agrippa maintained that number and space and time existed objectively, and that the combinations of number in space, and number in time, produced 'motion' and all perfect motion was beautiful, and decisive.
Agrippa never needed to doubt that 2 + 2 = 4 whereas Karl Popper (not actually ever a member of the Austrian Circle) spent the whole of his life doubting it and at the same time suggesting it couldn't be proven nor could it be falsified and therefore it was not a scientific thing.
Eow-kayyyy.
Agrippa lived during a time at which it was possible to 'wear swords' and thus, he composed a vast treatise on 'the wearing sword.'
Bruce Lee never needed to wear a sword. And he was aware of Agrippa and spoke about him.
710bhp F8 Tributo - science or Renaissance art? |
See that kids? You don't know anything.
You watch the Hollywood movies with the little old grey or green guy who 'raises rocks with The Force,' but you cannot do that yourself and you don't even think it can be done for real.
Yeah it can.