Autism Project Donations:

Autism Project Donations here - https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=23MBUB4W8AL7E

Tuesday, 2 October 2018

The Complicit Media

Well I'm not sure all of them are complicit, but those that aren't are all the same too deep down the rabbit hole of lies over too many years now to be able to pull back some and give coverage to unpalatable facts - at this late stage.

I mean people like me and a few of those who read and participate here are all in open public view! It's not as though we are hiding anywhere. It's not as if we haven't actually been threatened by actual, real government spy agencies to 'shut up;' we have!
Sisters-in-law of Chris Blasey Ford

One time, they actually busted in on a Murdoch media office based on something we were doing, thinking that I/we were working for old Rupert!! Talk about guilty conscience. Even at the time it caused us a bit of a chuckle, despite the 'dangerousness' (that's a word, why isn't that a word?!) of the events.

No. No mainstream media would not have the guts to contact.

In fact, I think this is the real problem with Julian Assange - the minute he gets before the US Congress or Senate and spills the best beans he has, there is no way the US government, plus more than a half a dozen other governments could face the consequences of having to admit how much they pulled the wool over the eyes of the public. It isn't 'aliens' turning up in flying saucers that would undermine confidence in society and religions!! It is what the government itself has been actually doing. And it's way worse than the worst 'conspiracy theory' you've ever heard.
Shaved Adam's Apple bone - that's just a fact dudes

Bluntly I said that Blasey Ford is a trans-sexual, possibly not the original 'Christine Ford' who may have genuinely attended any of the schools in question, and a CIA operative - or at least, an operative of a faction inside of what was the CIA and I'm telling you categorically is not now; now things have been dramatically changed from within.

(And then I had to delete a whole bunch of stuff because I would have got into a whole bunch of trouble!)

Sunday, 30 September 2018

'Q' Will Confirm This Re Blasey Ford

"She was there to torpedo a very well liked, highly-respected judge."

That was one of the things regular RT legal expert and political commentator Lionel Nation just said in one of his YouTube video-casts.

You take any ordinary person, and have them appear before the 'high council' - that is one or other or both of the US Houses in Washington D.C. and see what happens to their demeanor.
"Honest, judge - I seen it all: I seen him, running through the pole-beans,
nekid as a jay-bird!"

Not to repeat over-much that in this case she was expressly there to run a guy out of putative office and out of town. F* me, but I would hire a gunslinger like Blasey Ford any day if that was what I needed.

Right in your face too, the whole thing is presented to the broader public like this - she is fifty one years old, a Professor or at least PhD Doctor, just a statistics expert from an upper middle class background who just well, has a job and role at an institute of higher learning, and is a - in the words of her sister-in-law - 'very private person.' 

Very private all right.

I recall this time once back in the exact same '80's in which the said-to-have-happened 'incident' with Brett Kavanaugh is placed - when I was messing around with these people who made regular trips to Medrugorje to insert high explosives into the bridges there, after which the er, 'War in Yugoslavia' miraculously er, also 'happened.'
This is Rizzo-the-rat, well, actually, it's
John Anthony Rizzo, a senior (then) CIA attorney -
could almost be a clone of our friend from 'Five Eyes' Bill, couldn't it,
one 'Neil Anthony Loftus.' LOL

All of them were 'of a certain age,' and all of them were being presented as Christian pilgrims to the supposed 'appearances of Mary of Medrugorje' that were taking place at night there when certain others of their 'friends' in the old firm would switch on the back then, latest in holographic projectors.

Some of them were Christian 'nuns' - Sister Mary this or that - and some of them were very lesbian-like individuals, albeit deeply deeply religious in the way that only Americans can be.

Now you gotta remember something here, namely that they were more or less working for the objectives and planned outcomes of the Albanian Muslims!! So there you go when it comes to true ecumenism, I guess...

Now the media wants me to believe that Doctor Professor Christine Blasey Ford is fifty one years old and was seventeen back then in the Eighties.

Couldn't tell you for sure about this here Professor Doctor Sister Mary Christine Blasey Ford, but these 'women of a certain age' in Yugoslavia were stone cold killers. Very good actors, nerves of steel.  
The hard jobs go to the oldies, see...

...Actually I could tell you for sure but then I would be facing the same scenario that Mr Julian Assange is and, well, we would not want to be doing that so everything I said here is just entertainment and purely for science fiction purposes and urban mythology and that kind of thing ha ha.

Just don't dip your fingers into the same bowl of water that our young friend Christine Blasey Ford does if ever you are planning to be some revolutionary person a la Jesus Christ or something because there could be poison on her little fingers and you could choke to death and end up in a wheelie bin, taken out to the furthest pine plantation in the dead of night and burned to ashes with a military grade incendiary in such a way as they would never ever find your body or even any remnant of it that could be identified as ever having been it.

If I had to make a stupid guess about her age I would hazard seventy or thereabouts.

This is fifty-odd:


Kelly Preston - 55 years old this month




Wednesday, 26 September 2018

Why They'll NEVER Work It Out

Tomorrow we have 'Mally No-Show' day at the US Senate Judiciary Committee. 'Mally No-Show' was the code phrase an off-book betting sheet run by crooked cops used, to take bets on whether Clint Eastwood would be able to bring in a protected witness - Gus Mally - alive.

Jeff Flake has been on the Senate floor literally begging that Professor Doctor Lawyer Pope Goddess Blasey Ford shows.

And who knows? She might. You can't stop stupid.
Clint Eastwood in 'The Gauntlet' -
a good movie, lots of violence, but we don't
like to do violent pics here... 

...I am on the verge of revealing a few handfuls of genuine authentic global power secrets here on these pages.

It's still just that touch too soon though and even the prospect of Jeremy Corbyn getting into the highest political office in the UK under the radar of those who claim to be 'the elite' does not give me sufficient satisfaction to blurt it all out.

Corbyn is not anywhere near as deeply informed about today's world as would be necessary for an effective leader of government to procure some positive change - but he is without doubt as yet uncorrupted; an uncorrupted personality. And that might be 'good enough' for right now.

Nigel Farage has recently I suppose, disappointed those who wanted to see him permanently anti-Muslim, anti-Arabic, anti-all immigrants and bluntly racist - an Australian social media interviewer/reporter asked him a few pointed questions about Islam and Muslims expecting him to spew forth undiluted hate-speech but he basically deferred to a fairly conservative outlook that far and away the majority of Muslims were ordinary decent law-abiding citizens!

The key for those who can rise up to the level of discussion that we mess around with here, is in what Nigel said in his added aside about early chapter Biblical values not being acceptable to modern Britain, either (IE any Middle Aged-thinking).

Nigel is wrong. That is, he is engaging within the constraints of the ignorant public. He sounds right... Except he isn't factually right. But he still might be morally 'acceptable.' And that is the best the ordinary public can get to go on.
A clue about Intelligence Services,
and global power - or just power.
Donald Fagen from Steely Dan

You see -  there are no Christians who believe that 'the Elohim' are/is(?) the Father of Jesus; no Christian prayer that features a certain 'Jehovah' identity at all! Yet most people do think the whole of what is in the Bible bespeaks 'the Christian Bible' per se. It does not. Not in terms of 'rules' or 'laws' or who is an authoritative figure.  

Most people (including Christian people) commonly completely misunderstand what is actually in the Bible. Same as most Muslims don't really understand the Arabic used in the Koran and what it actually says. Either way it doesn't matter.

So what do people really know?

Nothing. They have opinions, often powerfully felt, strong ones - and these are always short of truth and fact.

The media and Intelligence Services hold views and express views but what do they know - in both cases we may legitimately suspect them of with-holding truths they possess and of promoting perspectives they want us to have. But in any case is it always true that they themselves have the complete picture on any given thing, know the full truth about it? 

Now I'm going to give you a clue about the up-coming 'revelations' - not that these will likely ever be acclaimed anywhere in the larger public sphere - and it will but only vaguely hint at real facts, yet it ought to be sufficient to serve as a reminder that there are people in the public eye, who have vastly superior mentalities and intellect than could even be comprehended by most. So much so in fact, that the public will gravitate at least in sufficient numbers, to some 'message' or some attractive element, not having the slightest foggiest clue as to what the kernel is, and which could in fact, only be apprehended by the most learned type of intellect.

What it is says on the outside is one thing; what it is on the inside is much more.

Here is the best quality recording on YouTube I can find - but there are considerably better-sounding versions of the same thing - Steely Dan's 'Kid Charlemagne' :








Tuesday, 25 September 2018

The Paris Syndrome

The Paris Syndrome is a term given to the appearance of psychological, pathological effects, in many people who go to visit Paris for the first time, and are let down by what they see and experience, compared with their romantic ideas about the place.

A Japanese psychiatrist, Professor Hiroaki Ota, is credited with coining the term as well as diagnosing the condition, in 1986.
Look straight up, and not around you, or
on the ground

There is another condition - almost exactly the opposite - known as Stendahl syndrome, in which a person experiences heart palpitations and dizziness and even delusions and hallucinations, from coming into close proximity with some well-known or otherwise remarkable work of art.

Apparently the Japanese are the worst affected by the Paris Syndrome because of the incessant depiction in Japanese magazines and media that Paris is nothing but stick-thin women wearing Louis Vuitton high fashion. 

...All the same, I have some sympathy for the sufferers of the syndromes in question, because I must say that very few things that are 'famous' really live up to expectations in reality and moreover, there are very few places that when you get there, are even anything like the pics of them in the tourist brochures.

London, in my own opinion, is one of those places that completely fails to live up to the hype about it, although admittedly, that hype died down I must say, after Thatcher compared to when I was a younger person. It's actually not too bad today, visually, in the sense that when you are walking in the notable streets like Oxford Street - especially the Oxford Square junction part - or Bond Street, the property developers and owners/managers have made things look a lot cleaner and 'newer' than say even ten or twenty years ago when it was still all looking pretty run down on the whole.

But inside the shops and boutiques, all you get is poor quality product substitution... And that was partly the point of my immediate last article here - modern marketing companies behind 'brand names' and industrial-scale output 'sell' descriptions of things that were they the actual real thing, would be fantastic, but they are not; yet they are expensive nonetheless. 
A great camera shot - cleverly lit

It's not so easy to wend one's way through the vast ocean of substitutes masquerading as the real thing, to find the tiny few things that are 'the real thing.' I have long harbored strong doubts about all of this 'billionaire' nonsense. I don't think there's either that many out there, and what there is of them, have so many 'ties' to the money involved, that for all intents and purposes they are more shackled in spending money than the guy on the street corner holding out a tin cup.

Synarome - What They Do

Nactis-Synarome is a French corporation that manufactures synthesized versions of organic molecules.

It is an old company, more than ninety years old in its current corporate form, in fact, and older still in earlier component corporate formations.
There is no such colored-Iris in reality...

Synarome - as it is more commonly referred to by industry insiders - operates as probably the largest commercial synthesizer of strictly organic-source flavors and fragrances; in other words, of compounds that originally came from nature -, natural compounds. This is distinct from modern industrial and commercial laboratories which create flavor chemicals or fragrance chemicals that, whilst they fall within the spectrum of molecules and compounds that can be 'sensed' by the human being at all - have in fact no real analog in nature. An example is the taste of certain artificial 'sweeteners' - they are factually not similar in taste to natural sugars at all, and neither are they 'created' along the molecular lines of natural sugar but are chemicals that fall along the spectrum of sensation in the human's sensory perceptions as 'not too sour/not too salty/not too bitter' and are picked up by the same areas of the tongue as sugars are - and therefore can be made to be accepted in the brain as falling in the category normally called 'sweet.'

Another example is various artificial aroma compounds said to be reminiscent to the human perception as what the color 'purple' might smell like. These are artificial scents and flavors used in children's candies often purporting to be 'grape-flavored.' They are in fact more closely related to compounds found in passion-flowers, than anything at all to do with real grapes.

Whether some of the artificial or synthesized products are pleasant or not may not be in question. The science of these man-made compounds has never taken into consideration new understandings of how such chemicals really work - knowledge of molecular electron chirality is only very recent to science. And yet there is already a substantial body of scientific work demonstrating how it is a factor in the human sensory process.

And so my larger point is that you can easily have many decades of 'false trails' in fact, that are built around redundant 'scientific' concepts - and these institutions whilst they could have commercial value, are also potentially so flawed that to rely on them as a kind of 'Biblical' version of some picture of 'truth' in any given field, brings with it the seeds of disaster.
A modern 'Russian cocktail' - made with synthesized colorant 

The preferred model of 'science' must always be a 'functionalistic' model, and not a political or ideological one - a thing is valuable to you when it actually functions to provide you with what you are seeking...

For years now we have been 'sold' on the notion that mere sense titillation is what we want and all we may ask for.

Most people today have been made so ignorant they do not even know what to call 'the real thing' in order that they can demand to have it - and I'm not talking about Coca Cola.