Insights Into Real 'Mind Control'

The only possibility to create 'impressions' that are false compared to objective outside reality, by means of some kind of remote 'beam' is if you develop sufficient energy, and which is directed very precisely, so that lesions are formed in parts of the brain; especially so-called 'unilateral temporal lobe lesions.' You can definitely create hallucinations in that way. And permanent damage, of course.

Every now and then, you get some phrase that turns up in a body of science, and it is repeated over and over in many sources, basically because it is an excellent description of something.

Here is one of those: 'the temporal lobe is a part of the brain that is used in processing sensory input into derived meaning.'

Trust me -  I'm about to do some 'mind control' on you...
So watch your step.

One of the most important and valuable areas of neural science these days is 'neural encoding.' All neural encoding comes from so-called 'temporal rate signaling.' The fact is - or, has very recently been ascertained - that the rates and packets of waves and spikes that networks of neurons perform when in various stages of action, are able to encode both digital as well as analog information. And the information is highly discrete, and we don't fully know how it is done. I mean, some people do know, but this is not knowledge available in published studies as yet. And it is a contested area because the leading-edge research demonstrates there are iterative templates pre-existing inside memory cell structures that provide feed-back for types of 'spike count rates.' Richard Dawkins has tried to say that such advanced complex (for one  instance - 'moral' meaning...) 'templates' which are there before birth are due to 'memes' being part of evolution. I mean this is probably the most hotly contested subject there is in modern science debate.

Anyway, here is the point you might look at in terms of what this Blog is usually about: designers, and I mean fashion designers, architects, design engineers and design planners - they all realize (the best of them, that is) that the human brain already contains very highly advanced and complex, sophisticated frames of reference; be it aesthetically, as well as why we 'think' a thing is utilitarian or not. That is to say, even human concepts about utility relate to weight we GIVE to meaningfulness of objects and desired activities - that is not really there in an objective sense at all. The train tracks go past the stadium BECAUSE we play football matches THERE. And football is important. In fact it is a matter of life-and-death. ?? And dominates our economic thinking due to that reason.

Could be, I suppose. And we are thus a bizarrely ornate evolved species, if so.

Watch it now, it's happening under your nose...

Real 'mind control' engages in temporal encoding strategies which play on our pre-existing templates of emotional significance. Theoretically. Because as I say, not a lot of the leading-edge material is published in standard academia.

'Temporal' does mean the signals themselves have timed rates of firing, and they also go in waves that have spikes and troughs. It can mean assigning meaning to sensory inputs, and it also deals with itself like a 'clock rate' inside any modern computer, in that there are ways to 'fudge' our own individual personal sensations of time passing.

Tchaikovsky is probably one of the most clear-cut manipulators (using beats and sound) of how we sense time - he has music that will give you the feeling of time slowing, or you moving more slowly, whereas Camille Saint Saens is the opposite and appears to always be rushing about; I mean even his famous danse macabre is an example of that when everybody else's danse macabre is a slow thing.

Smell sense is signaled, neurally-speaking, also through temporal encoding once the stimuli is picked up in the olfactory organs. Everything is signaled in the brain via temporal encoding. And so - at least in theory - there might be some connection in the spike count rates, perhaps some harmonics or harmonic ingredients, in common in Tchaikovsky music, and say, olfactory signals from vanilla (which has the property of making people feel that 'time is slowing down').

Now the key to what is picked up by the hypothesized memory structure templates, is in spike drop-offs, those distinct differentiation features in any run of rate average - and these are the things which eventually lead to distinct patterns forming which theoretically link up to the discrete emotional 'memex' or template (categorized, logged archives of discrete appropriate emotional responses). 'Edge detection' is a crucial area of modern computing and signal processing.

Now this all does NOT mean that merely because something is being repeated via your daily media - such as in a normal advert rotation, for example - people are seriously in a deeply and modern scientific way trying to 'mind control you!

In fact it's not about repetition at all. It's about playing on templates already existing within human beings - but which are beneath the surface. Human beings have been playing at the game of 'mind control' forever. The technique of how we do it, is known as 'art.'

'Mind Control' - Really??

The recent 'disclosure' in the wider press about some kind of documented methodology a covert (US) government department has, to do with the capability of exerting 'mind control' over selected members of the public - has a few problematic aspects.

Firstly, the 'research' or at least 'documentation' that was released under an FOI application by the US journalist Curtis Waltman, to the Washington Fusion Center - involves nothing but a litany of ways to do damage to someone, remotely, using electronic fields and waves and so on; nothing to do with actual mind control as such.

Secondly, the whole thing fits in neatly to the YT channels dedicated to disaffected individuals complaining about 'how the government is attacking them using remote beams...'

Remembering that it was Vannevar Bush, and not Richard Dawkins, who originally coined the term 'memex,' as well as the actual concept behind the word, which has now been modified to the word 'meme' - then, we can presume there could be some kind of 'meme' being effected here, rather than there actually being either any technology which delivers thoughts, ideas, and feelings, and images, into people's brains. (I should add, 'via extra-sensory means!').

Mind control technology...

Even if there were a technology that 'beamed' an idea, or an image, or coherent sound, into someone's brain, how does this equate to 'mind control' unless there is an accompanying tool which alters how they feel about that sudden 'image' or purely neural-activated 'auditory signal?'

It doesn't.

Typically, all we are looking at are another bunch of destructive things - sure, using remote transmission techniques and... ...well, so what, but?

Complex propaganda, and highly sophisticated whole systems and layers of data or information might be able to be used to manipulate people's emotions - that seems reasonable enough. It may well be that at some future stage, there could be highly-integrated micro-sized but very complex electronics, adapted into 'wearables,' which provide a sensory atmosphere or 'environment' or 'sense bubble' to the individual wearer. That's possible. And that is not what is constituted by the details in the 'accidental release' of documents to do with government technology on 'mind control.'

There are kinds of advanced prototypes that are down this research path - but they are not in government hands, and they are not destructive instruments.

Mind Control? ...An Issue with Wikipedia/Academia

I have been scathing, recently, concerning the under-reported massive funding of UK Universities and so-called 'military strategic think tanks' by Middle Eastern dictatorships. My view now, is that the only reason there is to possess any modern academic qualification is it's monetary value when you are prepared to lie on behalf of someone paying the money for you to do so - the ordinary member of the public, pushed on-wards in this uncritical adventurism, still 'believes in' anything anyone with a degree or Master's or Doctorate, says.

Wikipedia also has this unfortunate tendency to go by anything someone on a campus somewhere tells it. With the effect that a large number of entries are very misleading. 

Now I'm going to give just two examples, and these are from areas of interest that I have, and which I don't expect others to necessarily share as particularly 'interesting' in and of themselves. But nevertheless, they are still good examples that demonstrate what I mean by 'misleading.'

As a side-note, though, I know there are still a few people coming in to look at the post for the 24th of April, and so I will briefly repeat the link that is contained there: 

https://drive.google.com/open?id=1uW7p1fk0thQm0LXceAi4mZya20MV3BIz

...Which has nothing whatsoever to do with today's subject! But anyhooo...

On matters of culture and 'cultural folklore,' it's not genuinely justifiable to suddenly come out of nowhere to gainsay what the currency of that folklore already is - merely because you have some academic process of 'verifying' some odd thing here or there! 

'Jimmy the Hat' Allard

...I mean, 'Jimmy the Hat' is already a well-known race-track identity, you can't suddenly turn around and suggest his name 'ought to be' for instance, Jimmy the grey mustache!! And just because it happens to be a most certainly verifiable fact that he does indeed possess a tiny grey hint of a mustache, just plain does not allow anyone to change his actual folkloric name. 

But this is the kind of thing going on in Wikipedia all the time - some academic puts up some undoubtedly 'true (-ish)' thing, and all of a sudden, the really important key matter disappears altogether, in favor of some utter, and highly misleading, balderdash - that is, with respect to the significant issue entailed in having a Wiki entry at all.

Damien Oliver's (winning) riding style

Take this example: Damien Oliver is recognized around the world as one of the greatest race horse jockeys in the world. Now I know D. Oliver - his brother rode horses for me, and many a time early in the morning my sister and/or I would drive Damien or his (now deceased) brother Jason to and from track-work. I have no idea who posted or contributed to the entry for Oliver in Wikipedia. It has become, as a result largely of Wikipedia, a 'fact' repeated in the sports media, that Oliver won his first ever race as an apprentice licensed rider on a horse called 'Mr. Gudbud' at a track called the Bunbury Race Track in Western Australia. And that is true, and it is 'a fact.' And that is all that is recorded in Wikipedia.

And it is grossly, and I mean, from a racing expert's point of view, grossly misleading. 

Lengths in front as he wins, you see...

The whole point about the prodigy that Oliver is, is not that he won at his first ever race ride anywhere - it is that he won at his very first city track race ride on a main race day, against seasoned, and very good, senior riders - and he beat them pointless.

He rode 'Massingham' and I was there. The first actual mainstream race ride ever by Damien Oliver was on 'Massingham,' not 'Mr. Gudbud.' And he rode against senior riders of note, and he beat them pointless. ...It is extremely misleading to merely note that he won at some nondescript early stage in his training as an apprentice, a weak bush track race against no one.

Wikipedia, in failing to record this, is forgetting and failing the owners and trainers of the city horse Massingham, failing the memory of Oliver's riding teachers, failing him as the prodigy rider that he truly is, and failing in the understanding of just what a talent he possesses. Not only did he beat the other senior riders on the day - it was the way he beat them: his horse made three runs in the race (a nearly impossible thing for any horse to do), the other riders trying to block him and intimidate him, and he slipped through hard and incredibly fast, the horse going for him (meaning co-operating and running fast for his instructions as a pilot, which generally means the horse has confidence in him and trusts him), on the extreme inside against the rail after slipping in and out around traffic up the straight. It was literally impossible to make out the difference between the rider and the horse itself - they were 'as one' going past the post first.

And he's never stopped being that good since.

Second example - and this is taken directly from the Wiki entry on Pierre Lorillard IV:

"While it has been reported that Lorillard's son, Griswold Lorillard, introduced the then-unnamed tuxedo to the United States in 1886 at the Tuxedo Club's Autumn Ball, this is now known to be incorrect." 

'Known' - by whom? Where is any citation at all to this bald assertion?

Here's a bald assertion for you - at almost Seventy,
I'd still cast SLJ as James Bond, and I'd make millions doing it;
because he's AN ACTOR.

Tuxedo Park, is for one thing, originally named and owned by the Lorillards. The entire span of all common folklore about tuxedos is that they were commissioned and hence instigated as upper class formal evening attire by Lorillard at Tuxedo Park, and made by Henry Poole & Co of Savile Row. There are crucial aspects to do with color and fabrics used that are particular to Lorillard and to Poole. There is no other tradition. Period.

What are these present-day 'academics?' Cultural iconoclasts with nothing to substitute for that which they are egotistically removing, or seeking to remove by manipulating the media and information archives.

Why? What's the point of all this? It obtains right throughout a very large number of subject matters as they are represented in Wikipedia. Wikipedia is a first-call reference for almost everyone these days, but you have to be very careful about reaching conclusions based on what you will find there...

Ready For Some Excitement?

Well, here we go...

The link is to a downloadable PDF of selected excerpts from something being circulated in Eastern Europe now, which also contains actual examples in practice, of the digital EMF 'mind control' research of Thomas Prevenslik. The Russian title is, (translated): 'Invulnerable Missiles and Extreme Tactical Insertions.' A new movie of it is in pre-production right now - and it already has distribution through major Eastern European commercial distributors, probably (IE 'certainly;' though might be through a subsidiary in the West for political reasons) including Mosfilm too:

For PDF, click on the link below -

https://drive.google.com/open?id=1uW7p1fk0thQm0LXceAi4mZya20MV3BIz

The Most Sinister Things...

You will have noticed - I am sure - that no one in the media anywhere, not Alex Jones, not ZeroHedge, not Fox, not anyone, is able to give one iota of explanation as to the vicious animus against Russia that the government of the United Kingdom, principally, is exhibiting currently.

There has been no discussion or analysis as to why there is such vitriol being spewed by the various propaganda arms of State - the BBC, The Guardian, all the rest - and no historical analysis of who within government and its advisers, is driving this insane and sometimes quite ludicrous mentality. 

When caught in an obvious pathetic lie, what the government of the UK is doing, is go even further into the Twilight Zone and manufacture ever more bizarre and outrageous stories designed to distract attention from the fundamental deceit of their positions about various 'poisonings,' and 'chemical weapons attacks' none of which even remotely hold up to the slightest scrutiny.

This is 'White's Club' in St James - and believe me,
it is a problematic place

Too many people all-too-readily try to ascribe some 'brilliant if unseen' and therefore 'unfathomable' insight and strategic purpose to the UK political stance and to the insane and bare-faced fabrications and jaw-dropping reliance on people's presumed gullibility. There are no such brilliant motivations behind any of it. 

The scene in the United Kingdom is dominated by two basic issues: fundamental economic dysfunction including insufficient tax receipts, and social instability and anger with the political elites. In this atmosphere, politicians and their managers, are highly susceptible to manipulation by money - they know they cannot last very long, and they know they cannot steal from the public purse what they need to secure their lifestyles in relative safety: and so they take large bribes.

And that is what has been happening in the United Kingdom, though no less in France. The current issue with Sarkozy allegedly taking millions from Gaddafi is evidence of this. 

This is an incredibly dangerous situation for the rest of us all, because unless challenged, the United Kingdom's highest strata of academia (who are all also party to this 'on-the-take' mentality) are apt to be listened to with some falsely-ascribed automatic credibility when they have none any longer. And so, if the Royal Military College, Sandhurst's leading figures tell the US strategic planners that Syria is a 'fragile country' and that it's leader can be toppled, or that 'Russians poisoned the Skripals' then certainly a lot of the ignorant and grossly self-opinionated fools who people the US Congress and the Senate are apt to give these pronouncements automatic credibility.

...And they shouldn't do that. In today's world no one gets a 'blank cheque' about these kinds of things, and least of all the United Kingdom who are literally nothing but a pack of liars nowadays. And they are a pack of liars for money and not ideology or morality or anything fine like that.

Now there are some 'bombshell' things that I am in a position to know about and to say, regarding who specifically, is driving all of this present nonsense about Russia and also pushing for US 'attention' and missile strikes - and it's not all as simplistic as the 'social media conspiracy theory' people are presenting on-line everywhere; it's not 'the Rothschilds,' or 'the Zionists,' or weapons manufacturers (although quite a few of these last mentioned people are totally irresponsible, but not all of them are...)

Olivia Williams -  plays 'Ruth Lang' in Polanski's
'The Ghost Writer.' She would not be allowed in Whites's.

I'm not allowed at the precise present moment to outline any details about this 'bombshell' but what I can say is by way of an example from a fairly recent movie - being, 'the Ghost Writer' made by Roman Polanski. He gets things almost right when he infers in the movie that Tony Blair's wife was a CIA operative, who manipulated Blair into undertaking policies specifically beneficial of US interests. I mean that's actually wrong as a matter of real historical fact, and frankly, rather the other way around: the US was led into undertaking its foreign policy in such a way as it benefited NATO and the Eu-Commission's 'Barcelona Protocol' and the Euro (currency) and the Sunni Islamic World.

The thing that Polanski did get right was his linking of senior academia to the CIA - or, better put, to the Secret Intelligence Establishment all over the Western World and its non-Western 'friends' like Singapore and Jordan and Saudi Arabia and Bahrain and elsewhere like that.

Ex-Australian Foreign Minister, Alexander
Downer - he would be allowed into White's

The most senior levels of academia in the United Kingdom today, combined with the major public relations and chartered accountancy firms, are the Secret Intelligence Establishment - and these are the people who direct groups such as 'the White Helmets.'

But there is a major problem with this cadre (and that is essentially what it amounts to) and which I may not discuss right now, suffice for me to say that I am circling the following two places and letting you have some advanced notice of the possibility of some 'incidents' in the near future: White's Club in St James, London, and University College, London. There are going to be some big problems associated with these two places and I'd remind you for the future that you never heard this from 'Q-Anon' (who doesn't know anything) or from Christopher Steele or from the FBI or anyone else - but you heard it from me.

It's been very hard for me to step away from all of this geopolitical material recently, and I have wanted to just talk about what I like to talk about, but what you have all been reading and seeing in the media at large is just so much rubbish that I cannot help but at least cast a spotlight on where you should really look to begin to understand what is going on.

Cross-dressing UK spy, Gareth Williams;
and he died, and no one, not even the insane UK government, eventually ascribed his murder to 'the Russians'
although I'm sure they tried.