Illuminations From The NSA

Accidents of course, do happen throughout history. The original insignia of the United Kingdom's MI5 contains a lot of similarities within its imagery to the whole modern Illuminati folkloric symbology.

The present logo is different

Everybody knows that the Illuminati was originally a Bavarian secret society. It doesn't help though that that original MI5 insignia is also similar to an insignia of a Nazi death squad within the Wehrmacht. Or that modern theorists link Heinz Kissinger with the beginnings of this theoretical and modern 'Illuminati' that runs everything by sinister means.

Even Fox's 'History Channel' insists on re-visiting the occult dimension of Nazism, and the influence on Nazism of mythologists and writers like Karl Wiligut and Edward Bulwer-Lytton - and thus there are still persisting hints today about modern 'Illuminism' and its transmission from the Nazi era via Kissinger.

Yes, accidents do happen. Planes hitting the twin towers was no accident but meteorites hitting the MI5 buildings in London would be.

Depardieu in Moscow is an accident and a co-incidence, and the direct targeting by the NSA of communications by French officials is co-incidence; the NSA bugs everyone - including all the Asians in this picture:

Everyone from the most junior clerk up in the Intelligence business knows that any information line goes both ways, upwards and downwards.

My own view is that certainly the Western Intelligence establishments have lost all control of the Snowden affair and they have gone well beyond running the risk of giving themselves away in very poor strategic ways.

The fact is, for sophisticate computer systems people, it is easy to know and to 'see' when a foreign government agency is 'watching' your electronic communications. And it is basic logic to realize that when they do it over something that is sensitive to them, then it is an admission of guilt, really.

Hurley in Grozny,
with Dip-a-de-do

I mean I've already said here that there was outside interference in the death of the Total Oil chief in Moscow. I don't know who would be sensitive over that except someone who hand their hand in it.

I've just chucked in the pic of Hurley because there's a Brit army name if there ever was one. Just co-incidence though. 

Satanic Way To Billions

For me, one of the abiding beauties of the internet, is the demonstrating of precisely how ignorant, pretty much anyone claiming to be some kind of authority on many subjects - the arcane ones in particular - really are. 

Take the on-going internet frisson about the Luciferian symbology all around us, nowadays given urban myth nomenclature covered by the term 'Illuminati.'

As you must know, this is linked to symbols that include pyramids and seeing-eyes.

Tony Colman, the music producer, gives an interview
to a Latvian interviewer, about music being
maths. I do not have an English translation.

The meaning of the words 'Annuit Coeptis' is claimed to be from the Latin epic the Aeneid and has something to do with God giving consent in a nod, and this 'gesture' is hinted at in Kubrick's movie 'Eyes Wide Shut.' Everything on the dollar bill has two meanings though, and most of them are straight-out puns. Even commonly, people presume the words do mean 'Providence nods its assent' to your venture. These words however, have to do with how they are actually sounded out, by cognoscenti. I am not going to say explicitly here, what they mean.

Traditionally, people of external authority say that the pyramid and the see-eye is to do with the 'chief cornerstone,' which is a biblical reference, and is supposed to be accepted as having to do with Jesus (the chief cornerstone).

That is not the case, though, in reality. The actual and real biblical reference, is to do with an item that is 'rejected by the builders,' and is NOT the chief cornerstone at all, but - in Greek - something at an extreme distance which has a specific geometrical significance to Greek philosophers and mathematicians. The word is 'akrogoniayos,' and the entire sentence or phrase that is used says: a small piece, rejected by the builders, has become the thing upon which everything turns, and is at an extreme distance from the mentality and conceptions of Mankind. 

No Masons will ever comprehend what this means. Not Freemasons, not High Masons, not stonemasons. There is no point people pretending to some special arcane knowledge they really do not possess - whether they are in secret societies or not. Whether these societies are large and materially successful or not. People do it though, wherever they can get away with it. In humanity, material success almost seldom equates to what the higher intellect can attain to. And so it is not any contradiction that materially successful people are regularly unsound on many other fronts.

Again many people, down through the years, have taken the sound 'ayos' (in 'akrogoniayos') to imply that it is an eye that is being spoken about.

There is an eye in the highest ranks of Freemasonry; it is an eye associated with an Underworldly being, which, when it gives assent to someone's venture, that venture is sure to succeed and to make vast amounts of money. No one in the highest ranks of Masonry are unbelievers in something, because they are shown experiences that are not on the material plane of things.

But here is something no Mason knows about when it comes to the word 'akrogoniayos:' This is a very ancient word and it means - 'extreme point, turning and opening out.' In modern English we can say, the Apex, as in the very Apex, but much more accurately, the correct concept is 'axis point.'

Such a thing, is at an extreme distance to whatever the endeavours of mortal material Man can ambit. According to the New Testament of the Bible.

Month For Running Second

And so, a week after the moderate run of the race horse Shamal Wind in the King's Stand Stakes, we learn that the mare will go to the Irish stallion Sea The Stars - considered by authorities on the sport as one of the greatest race horses of all time! And if you don't believe me, just Google it!

Now I can tell you what this might imply as far as the last run of the horse is concerned but to cut a long story short, no one risks a mare that is accepted for such an illustrious stallion in any kind of 'violence' racing at Ascot - which is known as a track with let's just say, 'peculiarities...'

For one thing, the prize money is ridiculously low and that generally implies the place has more to do with showing a horse to the breeding industry than actually racing it.

His Highness, Aga Khan

Sea The Stars won the Prix de  L'Arc de Triomphe, and the Epsom as well so it is some special kind of horse.

Not only that, it stands at the Aga Khan's Stud in Ballydoyle in Ireland. Recalling, as we must, that the Aga Khan owned the greatest race horse of all modern times - Shergar. That was the one the IRA stole and killed.

Now I gotta tell ya I have a high opinion of the Aga Khan so I won't be indulging any conspiracy theories about any of this, other than to point out that the Aga Khan has been determined to breed close to what Shergar represented as a 'type' of racing animal. 

And so as far as I'm concerned, if, three or four years from now some Aussie horse starts somewhere as a rank outsider because everyone has forgotten what its dam-side really is, then it won't be any kind of surprise to me if the horse won by the length of the straight and made someone a quiet fortune.

Webber does an advert for Porsche

Anyway it has been the month for Aussies running second - Brazen Beau, the ten million dollar stallion, just ran a close second in the Diamond Jubilee Stakes at Royal Ascot, and Mark Webber drove for his Porsche team into the second podium position at Le Mans.

'Impeded?'

Somehow, the horse I was interested to watch, Shamal Wind, became 'impeded at the start' and really didn't have much of a chance after that even though it finished better than mid-field.

Once again at Ascot, the ground surface saw the entire body of horses drift across the strip-cut and rather high turf, from the left to the right for some reason only the jockeys will know for certain.

What d'you mean 'impeded?'

Muthmir hit the boards for a solid third.

I'm not quite sure what the phrase 'impeded at the start' means...

But alas, of course, this is in the nature of all matters where money is concerned.

Though as I indicated I did not personally bet on this fascinating race. The race is fascinating for reasons that I will not go into here, but those reasons are well-known to seasoned race horse gamblers.

Fashion is another reason to go to these things although the dress rules are too rigid for me.

What 'Was' The Middle Class?

A better question is - how can you go to Bilderberg when the 24 Hours of Le Mans is on?

And another important question is - why was the Middle Class...

General Motors' Chevrolet Corvette is the answer.

The new Corvette ZO6 - or its racing version at least - just won the GTE Pro division of the 2015 Le Mans race, and it was a bullet-proof exhibition.

For such a fantastic looking car in real life,
there are very few really good pics of it...

Fans of this icon brand and design ethos know that it represents many significant cultural things - it embodies a kind of practical futurology realized into a 'now' practicality, it embodies hope, it enshrines later Post-War industrialism and the prosperity of an American Middle Class at its zenith.

It ought to have receded into cultural nostalgia but the latest iteration of this design mode is probably the best sports car in the world today using advanced technology both in its construction and contained in the vehicle itself.

Le Mans is the 'holy grail' of world motor sport. It is the pinnacle challenge of speed and endurance, reliability and performance.

The standard news media studiously avoids giving much attention to Le Mans, who knows why? One can but speculate...

In the spectrum of what is available for money, the Corvette is not expensive. Especially not for what it actually is.

I don't own a Corvette but I am spiritually 'a Corvette person.'

I may pine for the late Fifties halcyon social and family cultural era - but I'm only going to think about it like a song. Or maybe... like a sonata.

Not like some 'always faithful' chant. Not like some 'Sempre Fidelis.' More like a real song.