Shergar wins the Epsom by a record margin in a canter |
I suppose one of the greatest surprises of Ed Snowden's expose thus far, is that there has been nothing related to any of the more 'out there' covert programs that are supposed - by the usual speculators - to be in active operation. Sure his work is mainly to do with meta data, but within that framework there have still been able to be some military or strategic political programs exposed too - such as the Five Eyes spying agreement with the governments of New Zealand, Australia, Singapore, and the United Kingdom.
But no aliens, flying saucers, or any of that other usual 'out there/X file' stuff.
No cloning stuff...
lol.
Me personally? On one level, when I think Shergar, I think muslims. And cloning.
Of course, when I think Saudi's, I think London, and even Hatton Garden... And wherever that leads back to.
Funny thing about horse racing - when you see the evidence of past performances, in hindsight, it should have been a 'certainty' that 'such-and-such' a horse wins this or that big race. But it never is beforehand because gamblers - people on the outside looking in - can never believe what is right in front of their own eyes. People want evidence. But then they also have a floating view of what evidence really is and once they actually have evidence or proof, let's say, what they want next is money as an entitlement to bet on the certainty; in other words, they are on the inside and still they want to be on another 'inside' further along yet again. The 'inside,' is a never-ending horizon.
But that is still only viewing things from the 'outsider's perspective.'
Carlyle Group backed Obama.
And the Carlyle Group, is the inside. Or part of the inside.
When you already have everything, you get cut flowers! |
The question is, how far ahead of popular knowledge, is the inside, and how much absolute control, is the inside elite actually wielding...? Well, it's absolute, isn't it?
They already have absolute political power and they are the inside. So how much further inside then, do they feel they want to go to next?
The question is, what are they planning next - as the next objective? Not, what are they doing now.
People want evidence and proof but they already have a track record to go on.