Nevertheless!
These are the facts. These are not exegeses of religious texts from ancient times when it would totally have not been possible to 'go the scientific route' (there are one or two virtually completely inaccessible Greek texts which do it). Those religious texts by necessity were forced to stand at some distance from the facts, and relay complex events by way of symbology and layman's words and terms.
 |
| Farmhouse Biscuits shortbread with strawberry & clotted cream. These ones (from England) are actually quite good. ...On the theme of Fairies and so on -. |
But let's say - as in, that I mean this is the reality - that some 'Cosmic leading species' turned up on the Earth and formulated human DNA as it is; and but then literally 'stepped into it' themselves.
That is, they 'disappeared' themselves to re-emerge as 'humans.' And that is what we are.
Or, if I can put it this way: 'we' are, because some of 'us' are not.
And, they also installed the way back out...
And then though, another, different, yet still quite advanced and 'competing' species, seeing what was going on, also installed themselves into the DNA long-cycle of 'the human race' on the planet.
However, because they did not possess a complete grasp of really what was going on, and never actually had the adequate technology to accomplish the matter as a whole cycle thing - they neither saw (realized), nor ever installed, those segments which permitted the full control of the cycles and the safe re-emergence.
But 're-emergence' to where?
There are semi-autonomous, machine system-controlled platforms not far out in space from the planet here. And, there are also 'beacons.' All of these are mostly autonomous systems, not formally manned all of the time at levels that would be needed for, let's say, numerically, the whole entire human race.
And what is the purpose of it?
See, when we say 'a human person' what we are doing though, especially gene scientists (I mean Earth human scientists), is stating a generic thing: '(a) human.'
 |
| A lot of the males of this 'species' under the light here, get into the 'dark' themes, and the females absolutely detest it! This is the Kempinski in Oman, where the remnants of the IRGC families are currently residing. |
But that is not what humans are!
Humans are individuals.
Well -, except of course, as even the most cursory look around yourself today, you will observe, no they are not. They are indeed, quite generic. One is as good (or bad) as another.
The point of the exercise (that is, the 'Earth Experiment,' you could say), the whole point of it - is aesthetics!
It's completely obvious. Or it should be if humans were smart, which they are mostly all, not very.
Individual aesthetics is not ever a generic thing. Genes are generic in the sense they all will give you the result of 'a human;' but not necessarily an individual person.
This is where Epstein's money funding gene research into having people 'jump bodies' and take their consciousnesses into the newly 'grown' body - was just a waste of time.
The only way you can do it, in terms of actually having results of 'Marilyn Monroe,' 'Charles Chaplin,' 'Edgar Alan Poe,' or whoever - is literally to have a complete human race run over billions of iterations through a linear sequence. aka - the Human Race as it is.
What these so-called 'Grey Aliens' (there are good ones) are doing is taking DNA from out of subjects that the system wishes to preserve, and then grade them, and then digitally store the exact individual codes/sequences.
And then all you are doing is getting the physical form in a sinusoidal way, because each person also is modified in situ, and has sharper characteristics determined by the material conditions of their life as they are growing here.
 |
| Hey, we are humans in here! No Fairy food for us! And yes, there are no actual 'beef-eaters,' Meg, in London, and no animals in 'Piccadilly Circus.' Meg. You child. |
You see, look at it this way - people who cultivate 'prize roses' don't do it to get simply generic results. They are not looking for 'just a rose bloom.' They are looking for amazing (new) examples of the 'Rose Plant.'
As I have pointed out before in here, the Bible does not say the 'Tree of Life' gives life...
That would be redundant.
'Zoe' gives Life Everlasting.
'Zoe' is encoded into some humans but not most humans.
Most humans today are genetically incapable of 'Joy.'
They substitute 'pleasure' or 'sensation' or 'happiness' for Joy but Joy is a much more complex idea than any of those things.
Try this. Next day you walk around any city (safe city, so that excludes pretty much the whole of the United States, sorry), or large Mall say - have a look at the people and see if you can tell if any of them 1. have Joy, 2. are able to express it -.
You will find that almost none of them is able.
Now.
Leaping across to this matter of other kinds of living intelligent beings here, and specifically going to the Phaeacian kinds, all of them have the characteristic of appearing to be able to change their size or height.
Without naming who, but certainly one that we have never, I think, from memory mentioned previously in here - there is one very well-known Hollywood actress who stands five feet eight inches without shoes, and most of you will have thought, from watching her interview with Dave Letterman, sitting in that chair - that she is not tall, maybe even diminutive.
In heels she stands at least six foot.
All of these beings have this rather childish, if not tone of actual speaking, then they come across as that because they are that. They are 'children' Elves and whatnot.
 |
| Now that would give you a bit of Joy, right Bill! |
It is very very rare to have a mature person from this tribe or species whatever you want to say, exist here in the form of what looks like a normal human living a normal human life.
Billy Crystal, by comparison, is much shorter.
Now. That is to say next time, I hope to develop a bit more this technique of looking for the people whose genes - and it is literally inside there - have the natural capacity to find and use 'Zoe.'
And when I say 'Zoe' I mean in the Divine Ancient Greek terminological sense. Which is not something you will have been taught about in school.
Meanwhile, compare and contrast this with the last track played here. Once your ear can 'hear and comprehend' then it will be so much easier for your mind to 'see.'
So, what's the deal with the competition between USA and China to establish manned bases on the Moon? It seems to be a waste of time and resources if governments are aware of the presence of ET among us. It would seem that resources would be better spent in trying to fathom ET's mode of movement through the 'ether' and 'adapting' to alien environments, than continuing to utilize rocket technology and constructing Bucky-ball environmental domes on planetary surfaces, right? Just wondering.
ReplyDeleteWhen the actual 'reveal' of ET here occurs - and it will except nothing like in the way everyone thinks, because that CAN'T happen (I'll explain in a second) - it will become much clearer that well, human life goes on (too). As in, it must proceed as it will. So on the one hand it is a matter of spending (okay, also wasting too) A LOT of money going to the Moon just because that is 'technological progress,' on the other hand really super high-tech stuff like dimensional portals, time-space folds, whatever, have 'black budget money' spent on them already with the objective of 'getting there soonest with the mostest.' Governments have no 'backing' to ANY of their currencies now, so they use Space Programs as employment avenues and quite a bit of military use and communications capability - but they can spend as much as they want, really. That's why 'trillions are missing' at the Pentagon. They're not missing. They are deployed in places they won't let you know about.
ReplyDeleteLet's go back to the base hypothesis that there IS for real, 'bad Reptilians' or something like that, here. In other words, this is contested space and the people living here are 'up for grabs' to some extent. Everyone in all of these commonplace now online 'Space Alien/Disclosure/Ascension/Rapture' and so on discussion area are all sure 'WE' are trapped here BY the (bad) Reptilians. Whereas, it is THEY who are trapped here, if not altogether 'captured' as such, here. If THEY knew precisely how to escape, and then maybe commandeer a few of the craft around the place, also the beacons set-ups, then 'we' are all in a spot of trouble. So, there is not going to be an obvious WIDELY shown or said or 'disclosed' ET Alien presence happening - but there will be a small, misleading-to-the-Reptoids and others, kind of disclosure to some humans. Once 'they' find out enough, they will 100% for sure grab a bunch of humans and try to rip those key gene segments and copy them into themselves. In fact, there have already been lots of attempts. They have a half-baked conception of what it's about, but they're really nowhere near finding out the correct thing. I have to talk about WHY we are seeing so much mainstream or at least online talk about this matter. And also explain WHAT the 'false invasion' really is (and is about).
ReplyDeleteWhen you watch TV news, the political goal is to 'manufacture what appears to be consent.' And the theory of that is, that BECAUSE there is a lot of talk on a certain SUBJECT, THAT MEANS governments HAVE CONSENT. To engage in money-spending and action ABOUT that subject. 'Consent' has been manipulated from agreement, to acknowledgement. We 'ACKNOWLEDGE' there are ET Aliens and we KNOW they are 'demons;' therefore we can kill them, harm them, act against them, and so on. It's never, 'looks like there might be Aliens, so, what are they...' You have already seen this in the media. So there is no point me or anyone actually SHOWING you an Alien, because 'they are demons' and 'they are bad.' JD Vance said so. Must be true, right? Some people already know how to 'get up there:' Desoray Kencayd, Marston Fries (add an 'a' in there and what do you get...), Kory. Shirley MacLaine. And those are just the people actually 'in the ET discussion space.' But they had better watch their steps from here because while still none of them is actually showing you craft landing with people getting out or being in them, well, no one will take much notice -, five seconds after they film what they should be more careful filming, they'll be 'disappeared' and/or have their DNA looked at.
ReplyDeleteI often reach back to Arthur C. Clarke, and wonder if he was prescient, had gifted insight, or was just a shill for those who want to control us?
ReplyDeleteFrom "2001: A Space Odyssey" -
Call it the Star Gate.
For three million years, it had circled Saturn, waiting for a moment of destiny that might never come. In its making, a moon had been shattered, and the debris of its creation orbited still.
Now the long wait was ending. On yet another world, intelligence had been born and was escaping from its planetary cradle. An ancient experiment was about to reach its climax.
Those who had begun that experiment, so long ago, had not been men - or even remotely human. But they were flesh and blood, and when they looked out across the deeps of space, they had felt awe, and wonder, and loneliness. As soon as they possessed the power, they set forth for the stars.
In their explorations, they encountered life in many forms, and watched the workings of evolution on a thousand worlds. They saw how often the first faint sparks of intelligence flickered and died in the cosmic night.
And because, in all the galaxy, they had found nothing more precious than Mind, they encouraged its dawning everywhere. They became farmers in the fields of stars; they sowed, and sometimes they reaped.
And sometimes, dispassionately, they had to weed.
The great dinosaurs had long since perished when the survey ship entered the Solar System after a voyage that had already lasted a thousand years. It swept past the frozen outer planets, paused briefly above the deserts of dying Mars, and presently looked down on Earth.
Spread out beneath them, the explorers saw a world swarming with life. For years they studied, collected, catalogued. When they had learned all that they could, they began to modify. They tinkered with the destiny of many species, on land and in the ocean. But which of their experiments would succeed
they could not know for at least a million years.
They were patient, but they were not yet immortal. There was so much to do in this universe of a hundred billion suns, and other worlds were calling. So they set out once more into the abyss, knowing that they would never come this way again.
Nor was there any need. The servants they had left behind would do the rest.
On Earth, the glaciers came and went, while above them the changeless Moon still carried its secret. With a yet slower rhythm than the polar ice, the tides of civilization ebbed and flowed across the galaxy. Strange and beautiful and terrible empires rose and fell, and passed on their knowledge to their
successors. Earth was not forgotten, but another visit would serve little purpose. It was one of a million silent worlds, few of which would ever speak.
The first explorers of Earth had long since come to the limits of flesh and blood; as soon as their machines were better than their bodies, it was time to move.
First their brains, and then their thoughts alone, they transferred into shining new
homes of metal and of plastic.
In these, they roamed among the stars. They no longer built spaceships. They were spaceships.
But the age of the Machine-entities swiftly passed. In their ceaseless experimenting, they had learned to store knowledge in the structure of space itself, and to preserve their thoughts for eternity in frozen lattices of light. They could become creatures of radiation, free at last from the tyranny of matter.
Into pure energy, therefore, they presently transformed themselves; and on a thousand worlds, the empty shells they had discarded twitched for a while in a mindless dance of death, then crumbled into rusty dust.
Now they were lords of the galaxy, and beyond the reach of time. They could rove at will among the stars, and sink like a subtle mist through the very interstices of space. But despite their godlike powers, they had not wholly forgotten their origin, in the warm slime of a vanished sea.
And they still watched over the experiments their ancestors had started, so long ago.
From our present-day perspectives, given that so much has been disclosed into the general dialogue by a retinue of those with either insider military or insider deep intel knowledge, when you read all of that from Clarke now, it shows a far greater 'knowledge' you could say, at least of what is being said in the public arena now by various parties, than he ought to have 'known' at that time. At the same time though, he is for me betraying this exact same 'overlords to the humans' characteristics you find particularly in the Quran for example, which continuously denies any of the standard definitions humans have and have had since forever, for 'God.' Clarke literally asserts 'Mind' as 'the most precious thing they had found.' And then proceeds to install it into 'machines.' God by standard definition, is Absolute, All-Knowing, ALL-GOOD, All-Powerful. Islam and Clarke have this characteristic that 'God' cannot enter into general Creation, and is 'absolute' but not IN the 'relative.' But this is complete nonsense - since God, if Absolute, MUST NECESSARILY also be Absolutely ALIVE! And if 'Alive,' then sensibly alive not theoretically or nominally alive - He MUST be part of the material Universe as an Alive Being... And therefore He MUST be greater than mere 'Mind,' because 'Mind' alone can be Evil as much as it might be good. Thus 'Mind Alone' is NOT the most precious thing for intelligent sentient beings to have found - but rather, Mind that is Good; which means Mind that Loves and that supports and relates. ...There are Reptilian creatures here and there have been for a long time. They have techniques to 'shed their skin' but retain their memories and consciousness into the next skin/s. And Clarke is one of them.
DeleteAlthough the standard narrative is that Islam is 'monotheistic,' it is in fact mono-ATHEISTIC. It's Deity fulfills none of the standard definition elements for 'God.' And therefore they are using the term itself as a parallel substitution fraud; they say the word ('God'), yes, but have another meaning that no one else has! The 'God' in it is not existential, but formulative, proposed, unseen in material form - aka proposed to be 'in the future and (claimed) in the past but never right now today in the material.' Yet, it is claimed to be 'One' just like the so-called 'Monad.' Thus it is 'mono-ATHEISTIC.' aka 'One' (thing) yes, but which is NOT 'God!' The Jews, by contrast are able to fulfill one of the standard definition elements for 'God' in that the whole entire Nation of Israel literally saw 'God' on a mountain one time, and the current 'witnesses' of that is the culture which asserts their antecedents did not lie. Same with the Christians who say 'Jesus is alive and here now.' Without validating either of those two groups and their 'witnesses,' however, logically and ontologically they do fulfill the definitional requirement - that God at least 'BE,' as in 'exist sensibly for real and apparently to the human senses.' And that is because 'if Absolute' then Absolutely Alive and Existing, not externally existing in some unknown, unseen pseudo-reality which fails to cover actual reality. Clarke also performs the same linguistics 'miracle' in that he says 'they had not yet become immortal...' But why should they? Ever? They are MATERIAL and therefore Gauss-bounded - they increase, fall, die. But then he inserts 'Mind' suddenly as if 'Consciousness' and 'Mind' are one and the same thing in toto - and then suggests his Aliens will at some stage build machines into which they insert their minds; alas, THAT IS EXACTLY NOT, 'immortality' of THE MATERIAL CREATURE but of an invisible 'mind' only. Real humans by contrast, want immortality, literal immortality of themselves AS sentient bodies.
DeleteTo make matters worse, he even outright says 'latices of light.' Bejeezus! That is categorically what the Bible says Satan masquerades as. I mean come on, just even try to avoid that...! Beings can have light in them, and use light for various things such as communication and signals, even semiotics, but they don't need to BE 'light.'
DeleteIt's funny. It is Clarke's apparent categoration of 'Mind' as dispassionate, and seemingly beyond all dualities of Love/Hate, Good/Evil, etc, that I find so appealing.
DeleteI listen to this with a glass of port:
https://youtu.be/3xvTgG9UTnM
Heck, the writing is super intelligent so yeah it's appealing! ...Let's see how you feel though, when Elon runs his 'Neuralink' into your brain via the Vatican. LOL
DeleteThe problems that the Artemis astronauts are having with their toilet is a perfect illustration of why this frail organism we inhabit ain't made for space exploration. Clarke's biomechanical entities should be our next step - the mind-machine amalgamation, yes?
DeleteAs for Elon's Borg-collective: could it be any worse than the clown show we're currently living?
Oh hey. Are "people particles of intention." People Particles. No. Actual people. What.
ReplyDeleteI think 'intention' is an aspect of 'people.' A single particle? You are veering toward the 'Monad.' Or 'the god particle.' Good luck.
Delete"people are an aspect of intention" oh boy. what. yes. and the language of fairies is light. that's why he's so "spaced out". not particles of language, but "embeddings of length 768" oh yeah. space is "particles" particles are boundaries. you are here, i am there, are there grapes in the kitchen? oh yeah. uh hum.
Deleteanalogy gratis "vector embedded databases." are there "grapes in the KITCHEN." tricks with particles on either side, but oh in the middle its "cosine distance." what? vibes.
Delete'Information' and 'data' are not facts OR knowledge: they are topography. And even a fact is pointless and even can be dangerous if it is not adequately understood in the hands of the person holding it.
DeleteA friend is interested in reading the Gospel of Mary Magdalene. Can you recommend a translation? I have one by Leloup and I think there may be some mistranslations at the most important part. His translation says the thing that sees is the Nous and is between the Psyche and the Pneuma, but he equates the Psyche with the soul, not the human brain's mind. And Nous is "intelligence" according to wiki, which I don't think is exactly the same as Ousion (though that is intelligent).
ReplyDeleteThe one I have in my library is by Simon Gathercole, King's College, Cambridge. I take your point that there are a lot of key words such as 'Psyche' that are too often changed into 'modulated' English words - even Crazy Ammon Hillman says just leave such words ALONE, and call them as they are right there in the original texts. The reality is you have to try and pick your way through the language, through the weeds of variable word meanings and somehow get to a satisfying conclusion. It's not easy and there is no perfect way - other than, that once you have a lot of these texts under your belt, so much more becomes obvious that is literally impossible to explain to outsiders, people unfamiliar to the sources, and how just go by 'Grok' and other AI summaries.
DeletePsyche is depicted as a woman with butterfly wings. Is Psyche the soul or instead the brain's mind?
ReplyDeleteAlso, something you said here a while ago now just came back to me. Children of a dragon and a fairy. Mists mixing. Is Pneuma and Psyche, no?
Yeah good point/question. Not the soul - because that is a composite structure of MANY elements. 'Psyche' is a Divine Archetype and exists as a real 'person' if you will, somewhere; it's like a stage drama in which various people play various formal roles with very defined characteristics. On the one hand, 'wings' simply means soft, fluttering, easily scared off, difficult to catch in one's hand - on the other hand, when actively performing in the role, literally IS a winged being... But you don't have to believe because mostly no one does; except small children. Who know much more than adults though.
ReplyDeleteAnd if you notice, whenever someone 'gets it right' in material reality and therefore in human culture, it becomes a motif, a long-lived, enduring image of something that has a defined meaning. The Rolls Royce 'Spirit of ECSTASY' is EXACTLY Psyche: and, just look at the word there - 'ecstasy' aka 'Zoe,' the Giver of Eternal Life to humans.
Delete