Now admittedly, this is not the sort of 'help' that most people entertain; that is to say, that they even want/desire at all.
Yet what I mean by my being able to give some service - and that is in the intellectual sense, by way of turning concept shapes and forms around so that they are seen better - is ultimately not about what I am giving that you haven't already got, but helping brush away other people's quite intentional acts and actions to do deliberate harm, and to obscure knowledge.
![]() |
Stupid movie, but scenically great and does have some drama, but utter mindless nonsense too! Was not made by Vadim. |
We might well ask a question however - look, how come (and let's allow the first proposition; namely that there are much more advanced beings around) if those more advanced beings know and see that their valuable input is being blocked from people here, those beings don't simply act to remove the blocks immediately?
Now we could go for a long time trying to answer that valid question, but sometimes it is easier and better, to look at something, let's say, something that is an example from out of our known affairs - and by treating that matter in connection with this question, suddenly to 'have a realization.'
A realization that we would not have grasped by going round and round in circles treating the whole matter as simply an intellectual exercise with no material root in the ground, so to speak.
Roger Vadim was an identity in the big league of wide public - we'll call it - entertainment, who is on record in an interview saying the following (I may be paraphrasing a bit but the transcripts are available easily on-line, so you can check):
'Oh yes. I made a deep research into the occult and found that most people in that line lied a lot because they did not really understand their experiences, as I do not understand my own experiences of this kind either, but I believe them. I am, myself, an ultra-sensitive medium. I was able to move tables, shake them and so on, from a distance just by holding out my hand when I was a youngster. I have had many prophetic visions, and I have seen and met with my own Doppelganger twice in my life so far.'
Now if you notice, he did not say that he had met his own Doppelganger every weekend or twice weekly or every day or night - but (only) twice.
And I assume that being the European intellectual that he was, he was most certainly using the term in the most specific kind of Jungian - or at least certainly Germanic/folkloric - way possible.
I am going to jump, now, to the matter of the Villa of the Mysteries, in Pompeii.
This place is being 'conservator-driven' by the same people that the criminal Zahi Hawass is a leading member of.
When you go there, or look at images of the Dionysian Frieze (the long length of sequential scenes depicted on the wall of the ritual dining room) you will suppose these are the original scenes completely intact, albeit restored to some extent in terms of coloration.
They are not.
They are paintings made not that long of whatever is behind them as they now stand, set onto those walls.
Naturally, the 'experts' all declare voraciously that these paintings are completely faithful renderings of exactly what lies behind them (which you are not allowed to look at, of course).
This is the same thing that Zahi Hawass has been doing with the Great Pyramids for decades. He says one thing, and everyone simply must take him at his word, and as soon as an independent scientific group comes along to for example, use the latest scientific equipment - he immediately denies them access.
What is going on? Is there anything quite sinister going on?
Well -, in the case of the Dionysus Wall, the paintings are quite faithful depictions. Almost exact, in fact. It's only that now, we are able to see what the original colors were like.
![]() |
Woman running in the dark. Not because she saw something that frightened her. Because she's a fitness person, um, well, running in the dark. As you do these days, right? |
...Except.
You could go through thousands of pics online, and you will be unlikely to even notice one particular scene: the scene of the fauns.
Right now, 'conservators' are 'filling in cracks' in that scene, with plaster of some special kind, to preserve those parts of the wall from falling off - which the head and face of the Divinity seated in the middle window of the Frieze, has done apparently some good long time ago.
This is a bit like Cave Seven of the Dead Sea Scrolls area, which was blown up ('accidentally') by the people who first deciphered some of the scrolls - and so now only a few fragments of the absolutely and utterly guaranteed contemporaneous to the life of Jesus Christ, Gospel writings, have been recovered from there...
LOL
The Dionysian Frieze was made around 60 BC.
So - right around or before the entry onto the scene of 'Jesus of Nazareth.'
Anyway my point is this: Roger Vadim has over and over, made film versions of the 'Mystery Rites' visually depicted, if not specifically explained, by the wall images in the Dionysus Sanctuary at Pompeii.
![]() |
Kristy Thirsk, trained Operatic soprano converted over to trance music. Also is a composer and song-writer. |
The fauns in those images, have elongated ears and very large almond-shaped dark eyes with no pupils clearly evident. And it has come to pass recently, that these features have actually been changed in the painting sections, and definitely altered by the plaster filler activities underneath.
...In life, it is the case that every now and then you get a person who is 'naturally gifted' or I would prefer to say has an innate set of exposed functions - which in the rest of us are 'masked' and require our diligent focus to 'unmask' for ourselves in order for us to be able to make use of them.
Vadim is one such individual.
Now.
I'm going to add some words to what Roger Vadim was saying about his own Doppelganger.
People that you see, and that you know, or at least know of because they're in the public eye...
...are not the same exact individual actual person at different times or moments when we see them.
Huh?!
If you try and look around online for some explanations or proposed explanations of what the scenes in the Dionysian Frieze are about, you will observe that they reflect what I just said.
It's not all that easy to notice that they do reflect what I said, but when you roll it over and over in your head, and think about it a lot, you could come to that conclusion.
It is possible though not guaranteed or certain, that you might, suddenly, when you are reading about Vadim and his 'friends' and watching his films - have a realizing.
And it is after such a realization (I also deliberately call it a 'realizing,' because it is more immediate, more in-the-moment definite) - let's not call it 'a moment of enlightenment,' that's too loaded these days - that you might then be able to look better at why super-smart beings are so stand-offish, so 'not there,' so self-deliberately hidden and not making themselves known when it comes to the wider human population.
![]() |
Just up the road from where I live. |
And at the same time, this question then really glares in our minds, as to why certain groups and certain powerful people in the world are absolutely intent on never allowing ordinary people access to the thin strands of information that exist about this matter.
There is no question but that those 'powerful secular and also often religious authorities' are themselves nowhere near close to being in contact with such Alien strangers - and we can know this by looking at the lives of those people, like Roger Vadim -, who clearly are (were/still are in fact) in touch with this realm.
You cannot know or understand the Eleusinian Mysteries, the Christian 'Mystery School' rites and rituals, the Dionysus Cult secret rites, without touching first, the real examples in real physical human lives, of what these things mean in human reality.
The Pope, is as far away from the actual inner knowledge of Christianity, as the Paxtan government is from telling the truth about what it claimed to have 'shot down' this week. The fact is both the Pope and the Paxtans 100% act as if and as though they fully believe what they are saying and they 100 million bazillion per cent invite you to certainly believe it...!
And why, why are they lying?
Why do people need to lie on such grand scales?
What are we dealing with? Who - are we dealing with? Do you believe 'they' and you, are the same kind of creature? 'They' meaning Pope ppl and Paxtan government ppl and Mullahs and Jihadis and so on.
I don't.
Is there a connection between Sodom and Pompeii?
What do 'they' absolutely know, that they are perfectly unwilling for you to know or to find out?
You know, you're not going to find Vadim's 'Night Games' anywhere that easily; it's no longer kept on any mainstream distributor's lists, but you can get it through independent people making more or less boot-leg copies.
I mean, come on, Vadim is one of the greatest Producer/Directors of all time. The reviews for the film are consistently that it is rubbish.
But I don't think so.
Kristy Thirsk sings below. She is the vocalist on the track immediately previous to this post.
This track is in the Phrygian Mode - that's the thing the Ancient Armies used before they went to war, into the actual battle. As you know.
Nice music, and thanks for your long term efforts to help us ...
ReplyDeleteThe scale of the lie is including ...
lying by omission ... that leave out crucial information to mislead us with genuine sincerity of scavenged little exploded pieces of data missing context and glue.
Oldest online archived book with the communion wall painting pictured black and white, of Villa dei Mysteri is dated year 1918.
ReplyDeletePage 69 of "Dionysos Mystes. Contributi esegetici alle rappresentazioni di misteri orfici" on
https://archive.org/details/rizzo1918/page/n68/mode/1up
Is theorically picturing their "eyes" before 2013 restoration. But I would remain cautious as kind of mandela effects have causes and can alter material and digital archives.
Essentially, the original concept of the faun (Roman/Latin word) - or 'Satyrs' in the Greek, was that people said they were half goat and half human: their eyes were depicted as goats' eyes - elongated, almond-shaped, dark, and without the same kinds of pupil shapes that human eyes have. I have seen several quite different versions of that same panel (of the Villa of Mysteries) and in recent times the ears have been completely altered. Admittedly these pics seem to abound in very 'unofficial' kinds of places. But it's hard to even find it at all because of the abundance of every other panel EXCEPT this one. I have personal views of how many actual 'scenes' are behind the painted panels and that there are more than what has been painted. Virtually the only sculpture of a faun whenever you search it online, is the one in the so-called Garden of the Faun, but the fact is, Pompeii had lots of sculptures of fauns, regularly very child-like albeit also quite impish, and not like the one that is now commonly shown. I think it's also a question of examining the relief section of the eyes, around the actual obvious eye socket, in the Villa faun scene, to see if these are actually not obviously visible in any of the photographs - which is what I do believe.
DeleteOriginally fauns of Roman mythology were ghosts (genii) of rustic places, lesser versions of their chief, the god Faunus. Before their conflation with Greek satyrs, they and Faunus were represented as naked men (e.g. the Barberini Faun).
ReplyDeleteLater fauns became copies of the satyrs of Greek mythology, who themselves were originally shown as part-horse rather than part-goat.
Romans believed fauns stirred fear in men traveling in lonely, faraway or wild places. They were also capable of guiding men in need, as in the fable of The Satyr and the Traveller, in the title of which Latin authors substituted the word Faunus.
Fauns and satyrs were originally quite different creatures: whereas late-period fauns are half-man and half-goat, satyrs originally were depicted as stocky, hairy, ugly dwarves or woodwoses, with the ears and tails of horses.
Satyrs also were more woman-loving than fauns, and fauns were rather foolish where satyrs tended to be sly.
From my own personal past experience, I found older sculptures with almond shaped eyes, pointed or rounded hears, and partly animal body shapes in several cultures, including in Cyprus and Egypt locations, before Fauns and Satyrs ...
Here is a Cyprus sample from 600 BC on two pictures, from a dual Sphinx protected Goddess:
https://www.verenigingrembrandt.nl/nl/kunst/cyprische-beelden-en-figuren
Here another Egypt sample from 300 BC, from Ram-Headed God (Khnum):
https://art.thewalters.org/object/22.330/