Autism Project Donations:

Autism Project Donations here - https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=23MBUB4W8AL7E

Saturday, 24 May 2025

The Dumbing-Down Of Common Religion

So, to address the question of 'Moon rituals,' I posted a short reply to the comment in the last post here.

But in fact this whole particular post now, does pertain a lot to the same underlying themes.

It is impossible to shake most people up from their entrenched and misleading concepts about - especially with Christianity - standard religious things, because it's basically, too late. The whole of society plays follow-the-lunatic-dictator in this and obliges that complete lunacy all the way into the abyss!

Little Orange Racing Car,
on its way to see Grandma in
the foggy trees and mysterious
forest.


And because of the strong social bindings, people just are unable to mentally break out from false ideas, no matter how obviously and clearly false they are.

The oxytocin addiction is way too powerful.

Oxytocin modulates the human chemo-sensory decoding of many signals coming into the brain, and so they are indeed physically - physiologically -, incapable of shaking off the bad ideas.

And Ammon Hillman is not really helping matters. On the one hand he is helping me explain things with some outside, totally independent support to do with the critical language elements involved - on the other hand he is not helping people because of his own monomania about the drug implications of ancient religious texts and his refusal to acknowledge the 'prior art,' as it were, when it comes to the Christian narratives as they have been transferred down to modern people.

Let me clarify it specifically - there is no place anywhere where the Hebrew/Judaic texts refer to Jehovah as being anyone's Father. He is not recorded as 'the Father of Mankind' rhetorically or otherwise, nor of the Jews, nor of Adam nor Moses for that matter; literally he is the Father of no one.

So it's actually not possible for the 'Pater Noster' to be about Jehovah. Period. Full Stop. End of story there.

That's gotta be 
a North American Sweetgum
on the left there.
Contains 'telepathin...'
Don't tell anyone!
You can imagine how the trees
will all get damaged, and
the government will stop you from
using them.



And there simply is no history of the Jews where they actually had any kind of religious literature. Hillman does say that.

But then he does not infer the obvious, which is namely that the real history of Judaism in its modern sense (meaning, post the exile from Babylon), is via the conquest of the Hebrews and Jerusalem by Alexander the Great 332 BC - and therefore was a Hellenic religion!

He does talk about the Hellenic thing but he never states the obvious about it.

Which is 'the obvious,' being - in other words - that Judaism fought internally between its way way earliest origination as a Phoenician diaspora group, and its diversion really, into the Babylonian priest-caste whole thing.

'Judaism' as you see it and 'understand' it today, is a false thing; it is false to its own genuine authentic roots - its own narratives say that too but they don't worry about the fact! They literally say (in their texts) and show you that during the time of King Josiah, the priest-caste people altered the religion and which Deities they followed... And they try to justify this by saying 'monotheism.' Whereas none of the preexisting literary and oral tradition sources say that there are no other gods... They actually say the exact opposite.

'666' is the two triangles interposed.

The Christian texts are composed in Greek. There are over 700,000 words in the Bible (both Testaments) and Hebrew simply never had sufficient unique words to convey the concepts that are in there.

But the problem is this, you see - if I said to you the 'Father' that is being referred to in 'the Lord's Prayer' is Indra... Well, you can imagine!

Yet everything about Indra and Zeus, for example, is the same, even all the way to these concepts' appearances in ancient Sumer and Assyria along with those 'creatures' standing as protection outside of the Throne Room of God in Heaven (IE Lamassu, the Kheruvim - aka 'Cherubs'). 

And there's not a lot of difference there when it comes to the Norse 'Odin.'

'Jehovah' is a not a father to anyone.

It's only magical
when you know how...


It is not possible for Jesus to be making prayers to your Father in Heaven, and be referring to anyone 'Jehovah.'

Indra lives in a City of Light - the dwelling place of the Beings of Light.

When you try any kind of really advanced 'process' that seeks to establish a strong harmonic 'tone' or chromatic series of tones within your living human body, what you are doing, is trying to establish contact with Beings - intelligent Beings - of Light. By 'really advanced' I mean not just going to a Beethoven Symphony, and being absorbed by the sound alone.

And you know yourself that you don't want to be overwhelmed with some non-human super-heavyweight intelligence, some over-the-top powerful being that will look down on you as if you were some 'ant.'

'Compassionate' though they may have the reputation of being, you know you are not going to be 'on their level...'

The instant you wake up to this, and are able to shake off the dumbed-down stoopid 'megalithic monotheistic' crazy stuff, the sooner you will actually make contact with intelligent slightly higher beings, and you will definitely see the orbs that 'everyone else' (well, a handful at least) is seeing in the skies. And that'll be just the first thing.


Julia Church.
Sings below.

Megalithic monotheos means no space for anyone else there. This is lunacy. This is narcissism. This is the ego-mania of a narcissistic psychopathic. 

...Someone who wants to kill you if or when you disagree with them.

That is not a 'father.' 'Fathers' are tolerant and paternalistic.

In fact all the fathers I know, are long-suffering! 

LOL

Not funny. LOL

(I never even got to talk about the little tiny book that will stop you from being addicted. Next time).





9 comments:

  1. Are you familiar with Laurent Guyénot?

    I see him and his views as a hope for the West. (Of course, my greatest hope is for ET to land. But, be that as it may...):

    "Dechristianization is irreversible, but it does not mean the death of our civilization, because Christianity is neither the first nor the principal root of our civilization. For good or bad, Christianity has nourished our civilization for a time, but did not create it: we are still the heirs of Athens and Rome, far more than of Jerusalem and the Vatican. We are Greco-Romans in a deeper sense than we are Judeo-Christians."

    https://radbodslament.substack.com/p/renaissance-genius

    ReplyDelete
  2. There may be different ways to the same goal.

    If there really was no good past Divine Mother and Father figurehead for Humanity individuals, maybe these orphan species composing Humanity searched and found that "will be in future" ...

    ... or beyond, what was before the start, and will remain after the end. From Alpha to Omega and back again ...

    Is it crazy to have blind faith ? May be. But any sincere compassion to our crazyness may still be honored.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Let's see. How crazy am I today. It's the caffeine. I'm getting.... "particle physics, which is about boundaries (a particle is here, and not somewhere else)" "the boundaries between self and other, which appears to be a psychological concept" and then there's the "hymn a la vierge" set by Pierre Villette (who kind of made it famous) The second verse begins "avant les astres vous étiez présente, Mère du Créateur, "

    and then there's Carla Rueckert channeling "Ra" saying something to the effect that when the ETs showed themselves to humans, the humans could not understand the ETs as "other selves" and so things when kind of wrong. went kind of wrong i mean.

    okay. crazy time over and out.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If only Ra had been embraced by the West as the One-True-God of the multiverses, instead of the Hebrew tribal god! How things would have changed!

      Delete
    2. "Carla's Ra" says that Ra was also a lie!

      Delete
    3. Ra IS embraced by the West, He verily lives to this day, in this VERY day of ours. ...Changed his last name though from 'Ra' to Hillman. LOL

      Delete
  4. One man's 'lie' is another man's 'myth', is another man's 'allegory.'

    Dunno.

    I'm just standin' here / Waiting on a friend...

    ReplyDelete
  5. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Typos!! ...Academic people for centuries have given endless explanations of how come the Theogony (Hesiod) starts with more or less THREE completely 'different' beginnings (it's a bit like Genesis that way come to think of it...) or even you might say parallel beginnings; similar wording but kind of different slant. The reason is because the Muses are literally telling you straight out that although the narrative IS true - a truthful description of things as they really are - nevertheless they are rendered metaphorically in the poem. The actual metaphor of WHY certain gods behaved in certain ways is so astonishing that if you untied that metaphor it would cause you to question who composed the thing and question why did they compose it to be seen by humans at all. Hesiod is the first time in any written text there is a clear statement about 'the Greys...' And Homer repeats the 'myth;' except it's not a myth. We'll eventually talk about it in here.

    ReplyDelete

Your considered comments are welcome