People Are Missing The Implications

As Ammon Hillman is the guy with the ball (still has it even though he also drops it now and again) when it comes to ancient texts to do with the Western (which is of course, actually Eastern anyway) social-cultural-religious mindset - Ross Coulthart is the man with the ball when it comes to any official revelations about UAPs.

His interviews with a dozen US media and news outlets this week, chiefly springing from the Morning in America feature piece where he is a regular contributing editor, included footage of a pair of 'lights in the night sky' - not stars, not planets, not drones, not satellites - closely attended to by a number of military helicopters.

This footage I happen to know is authentic.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=etTpjpBFs0Y

[These things are much more obvious and visible in RL. No 'dreams' or 'visions.' You should be seeing them yourself if you followed what I said here before - and if you are not or have not, yet, then you are not doing it right]

Don't worry about how (I know it's authentic) - and more than that, all of you who have been playing around with the techniques talked about broadly in here, should have already seen exactly, and I do mean precisely and exactly, the same kinds of things; the government helicopters I think are just a co-incidence. Well, put it this way, they are that vis-a-vis the 'moving lights' themselves, but maybe with the Coulthart incident things might have been a touch 'planned' in terms of being able to get military-grade tracking recordings and vision.

The person who was 'key grip' 
on this photo-shoot
by Helmut Newton, when Karl
Lagerfeld ran second to Yves Saint
Laurent in the Sydney Opera House
Art Competition - was a personal
friend of mine.
All of them very, um
'complicated' fellows.
And that's being light on it,
isn't it, Antony Kidman?
Except he's dead and I never met
him and he's not the guy I'm talking about;
just wandered around in the same circles.
9 Circles.
LOL
Shouldn't have done that.
 

I raised the whole thing with my Russian analyst friend next door and he just outright interjected straight away before I had hardly said anything much - 'what's the connection between Hillman and UAPs?'

...See I had actually mentioned Hillman with the matter to begin with.

And so I said, hey look, so what if people are going out somewhere - although that is definitely not a condition of anything in itself - and 'doing something' specific, and then these things are genuinely turning up as if 'on request,' as it were?

Like - then so what though?

They (the objects) go away or disappear, everyone goes home but what are these people thinking in their minds?

Humans being what they are, are going to manufacture narratives, and they'll all be false narratives, made-up things based on speculations and biases - and that might be a bit of a dangerous thing to indulge in case for instance, these 'visitations' either have a purpose we don't know about, or even be actually dangerous; in other words these 'orbs' and the intelligences behind them have malicious intentions.

No question at all but that all of the religious systems around the whole world have narratives to do with 'supernatural' events and visible strange things and so on - but there's nothing at all entailed in current religions anywhere, that have things actually turn up 'on demand.'

This is my view:

All of the religions, and that includes Eastern/Oriental ones, are merely people trying to claim authority by copying what they or someone heard and or saw at some point in the past.

They don't really have any idea about what is actually going on, but they can easily enough make up something and tell the dummies in the public, that thing -, and that is what they do and absent of any contradictions (occasionally of course they kill those people who have genuine contradictory information), they get away with it and all the dummies follow the grand and stupid false narrative.

Islam does not have any kind of official supernatural thing go on with any of its rituals, albeit the culture itself has an enormous number of superstitions and concepts about 'magical' and 'demonic' and 'genie' stuff.

There's nobody sensible in the Catholic rite that believes wine turns into blood (and this, by the way, is in any case the opposite of what the meaning of the original source texts are saying, namely that the wine is the blood of some Divinity; not that the wine becomes someones human organic blood - far from it. And the proof of this is that the early religious writers repeated the Greek story of the Ichor 'blood' of the Gods being lethal to ordinary humans... Which is why a human has to undergo the rites and rituals in order to 'become' something that can handle it).

The great Scribes - had 
great paper.
Very expensive.

But still, this is a religion or religious practice which does have an existential 'supernatural' element going on in situ and in present times.

Same goes for a few of the Sufi sects; they have roughly similar ideas and rituals.

So let me put it another way though - there's no religion which outright claims to have 'lights' actually and really truly appear at some moment in a religious ritual. There is this thing about 'holy flames' and so in Coptic churches and Eastern Christian ones in Jerusalem but this is nonsense and everyone knows it.

But come on, Ammon - where does this occur perhaps, somewhere deep in the past, long long ago...

And I'll tell you why you need to tell us Ammon because we need to look at the thing hard:

If - and it has been put beyond dispute now because of the Navy-filmed and tracked Tic Tacs and the fact that Coulthart and his mates and Greer and all of them, are literally having these things appear 'on order!' ...So, if it happens -.

And filming them and having the military film them as well - and all on command.

If - then why?

Ammon is of course not going to tell us. He's not following this trajectory of the whole thing. His angle is that churches tell lies. Well, we know that.

Greer has been edging closer and closer to it, because he gets the implications and he's knowledgeable enough in the broad sense to have started to put two and two together.

Sure some Aboriginal 'Wangi men' can get the Min Min lights to turn up on request but they never impart the 'why' to the rest of the tribe because it's a completely esoteric and strictly limited-access thing.

The past is better, see.
The human race has not moved an inch
since Medea was in the Bronze Age.

So are there are any ancient accounts or records in writing, of people doing something or some things, having lights appear, and then something else happens?

So far these guys like Steven M. Greer and Ross Coulthart have just been getting the lights to appear. Is something meant to happen after the lights?

Well yeah!

LOL

They ain't gonna tell you because they don't know.

It's possible they will find out and it may or might not, be so pleasant.

I think if you play around with stuff you don't understand, and it could be stuff way more powerful than you are right now, it could be a dangerous thing to be doing unguided.

I mean of course I do know what's going on. And I will tell you but as I have said all the way along - sometimes, mostly in fact, it is much more helpful when people  kind of work things out themselves without being totally spoon-fed the answers. People believe themselves more rather than accept if someone just sets it out for them.

The question therefore is, and remains open: is there anything in past literature that tells us about these lights appearing following any rituals, and then, do any of those accounts tell us anything about anything that is meant to happen next?

Before there was 'Eyes Wide Shut,'
there was Vadim's 'Night Games.'
See the thing is, in these 'horror/pseudo-Goth/fairy-
tale' stories, first time the
heroine (or hero) sees the God,
they get scared and run the hell out of the castle,
usually firstly down a spiral staircase.
And there's no particular significance
to the staircase; I'm just sayin'.

Stay with me here guys. Coulthart and Co - Greer included - all of them could get themselves in above their heads. But you never will be above you head.

If you just keep 'following the bouncing ball' here, as they say.

Do any religions or religious cult rituals talk about lights appearing?

Now let me tell you something straight up - not everyone is going to find out. I mean, yes you are but I mean not everyone out there.

As in - the rest of the world. I don't care how 'worthy' people all think they should be viewed as being.

This is a strictly limited doorway. Very narrow. Very limited.

And what's the pay-off? 

Well, has there ever been anything in the past, in the ancient past a long time ago... ...et cetera.

Ya haft think like this - 'Yeshayau' is what the Jews say is the Hebrew name that we say is 'Isaiah.' And Ammon Hillman says they're both wrong because it is and always was, a Greek word used by the Hellenistic Judaic period people, and came from much earlier texts and ideas. And he's right.

Book of Isaiah of course is the big thing modern Christians hang the Old Testament proof for the prophecy of 'Jesus' on. But if there was no 'Isaiah' a person, or a specific named individual person called 'Isaiah,' then who also, by the same token - is 'Jesus?' 

Because for sure those texts do explicitly predict the coming of someone that looks an awful lot like this 'Jesus' character that they are all so intent on naming like that. By the time of Muhammad of course, Jesus Christ do they muck it up - 'Isa' (so close and yet so far) ibn Mariam fergawdsake, whose brother was 'Aaron' as in the biblical Aaron, brother of Moses. See how far people can walk off the planet when they are willfully stubborn and insistent and utterly blind but have a whole bunch of names (or words/titles/descriptions in a different language) to play around with.

Theo-Gen-Yios. God-Engendered-Son. Dionysus. 'Isa' is feminine; means a pet-name for the Goddess of Wisdom. There is no 'Isa ibn Mariam!' This is a mis-reading of an extant Greek heretical text in the hands of the Nestorians.

There is a 'Yios' and a 'Yioson' (Jason/Iaison/Iasus - the Greeks 'tune' the endings of personal family lineage names), and a Rhea (the Mother Goddess aka Ma-Rhea), and a 'Yasa' or Yasara aka Ashera.

There are, as Dr Ammon Hillman repeatedly points out, zero as in none at all, libraries in the Hebrew language anywhere in Jerusalem or anywhere else, at any time within half a millennium(!) of when everyone claims 'the Bible' was put together or the first books of it, written. And there are insufficient unique words in the vocabulary of Hebrew at that time, to have managed to make the Bible. LOL 

Lyrics start a few minutes in: