Autism Project Donations:

Autism Project Donations here - https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=23MBUB4W8AL7E

Saturday 9 December 2023

Before The Next, Um, 'Insight'

Before there is any kind of 'revelation' about something very important, it is absolutely necessary to go back over one or two key issues.

The common viewpoint around the place in mainstream society, especially within the professional credential-centered world of contemporary academia - that there is no genuine 'spiritual' dimension is a fatally flawed position.

The problem being that when we use a facile description of the 'spiritual' as simply something that is highly intelligible but completely unseen, we are flying in the face of the latest factual knowledge. 


Yes we of course 'see' things on the outside of the human body (using that as the prime case for intelligent consciousness), and we can see reactions and effects and volition exercised by the physical and organic person - but what we do not see on the outside covers a vast array of complex arrangements inside the organism; the neural networks and connections.

On the one hand the most ardent common atheist will completely aver that beneath the skin there is certainly biochemistry going on and electro-biochemical actions that are an intrinsic part of the living intelligent human being - on the other hand it seems they are unaware of what that actually means once you look at it through the lens of the best and latest mechanistic factual knowledge of these things...

All of the neural network systems when they are 'alive' develop biophotons which may be observed using sophisticated and quite sensitive computerized equipment and technology. These photon releases are in the ultraviolet and low visible light range and this itself raises a significant question mark about what is happening.

In fact it is 'science' or at least 'modern/contemporary science' which is unscientific and pseudo-scientific about this because it cannot explain - has not yet explained - how come there is sudden entropy at the ultraviolet frequency when the energy is on a fundamental spectral trajectory?

We have discussed this here before.

Let us then rather than merely speculate -, let us propose, a very advanced piece of equipment which can give us a real-time view of the organisation and patterns of biophotons as the human being's neural circuitry works in real-time.

It used to be nice in Chicago...
...around this time of year.


Firstly we would be able to witness the links between incoming stimuli and what could be said to be the brain-level thinking that is going on to do with that stimuli, and then a split-second later the responses and reactions throughout the organism as a whole resulting, putatively, from those thoughts and nervous responses; with each neural electro-biochemical event throwing off some biophotons in varying degrees of intensity.

But secondly, over periods, we would be able to detect patterns. Some subjects would consistently have similar patterns when it comes to the particular stimulus, others would be less consistent, and some might be fairly neutral - but over all, when comparing a range of stimuli, then you would see some patterns (of responses) were very predictable in some people.

Let us 'speculate' that with some people you would see something very like the stanzas of poetry - with meter and rhythm and some kind of analog of rhyme.

This is the 'spiritual dimension.' 

And it is in fact very obvious - and very obviously existentially there - in human beings.

But light - aka a 'photon' multiplied - is not contained in organic structures ordinarily speaking. 

It can be asked to flow through fibre-optic cables but we do not have fibre-optic cabling running through our bodies and moreover, a lot of what causes there to be a release of photons in the human neurology, comes from electromagnetic fields and flows of EMF potential.

Find the door...
Find the right door.

In other words, not only is the human being, the material organism as such, susceptible to EMF externally, but it creates and develops its own EMF potentials and flows and so can 'communicated' to something outside of its own bodily containment - for instance to sensors and to sensing equipment.

Any experienced radar screen operator would be able to look at computer vision of some human 'subject' just being depicted as a 'radar plot' of real-time biophoton activity, and identify one discrete particular subject from any other one the same way that they can pick out particular whales from particular dolphins or submarines: without actually visually looking at the 'real thing' but only at an electronic signal-generated depiction on a two-dimensional screen (or a three-dimensional one).

What does this mean?

It means your neural activity coded as biophotons are identifiably 'you.'

As a parallel matter though, we must state that as far as is evident, the life process is a 'sovereign' process in the linear-Time Cosmos; that is to say, an individual may and can uniquely change 'over time' as the result of linear experience/s of things and dynamic relationships around him. A person can change and they can get 'better' - for example they can become better musicians, better artists, better at mathematics, whatever. And then no doubt some of their internal biophoton patterns would be modified.

Yes you are 'you' but you can also change. 

Is the 'contained' person's action of biophotons - all those patterns - what constitutes 'consciousness?'

Vulcan candle ritual...
Right?
Right?!


No because as previously said, light is not containable within any finer structures; it requires to have very manifest 'hard' barriers and counter-forces in order to be channeled at least - and there is nothing in the human person's physical structure that is in the order of an EMF barrier.

In other words, 'consciousness' where it is defined as coming from active dynamic neural organisations in electro-biochemical play - is connected to all other light.

Yet we do experience ourselves as discrete individual units for the most part, unless we engage in some kind of 'meditative' process or the like.

And so there is necessarily something to be called 'personal individual consciousness.'

I say all of this, or at least, somewhat repeat it now (because it has been said before), so that when we look at what any external other intelligent being is or might be, then at minimum we can notice that for the most part all of the other human beings around us are pretty 'vegetative' or 'automatic' - they are on some kind of very dumbed-down autopilot even though they like to think of themselves as super smart.

I mean you can prove it to yourself by realizing in a very mindful way that people are these networks of biophotons all going off inside of them in sophisticated patterns hopefully, just like a piece of highly complex music -, and then going walking outside around in some populated place and observing how many are really at all like that...

And that would be virtually none.

When you encounter such a person though, who is operating with very vast and complex and sensitive internal neural networks, it becomes immediately very obvious how different they are, and how interesting they are, once you look at them through the mind's eye that is considering how their patterns and networks of biophotons are working.

Although Alex Jones recently kind of misquoted Plato, one thing that Plato wrote that is much more astute and accurate than most suppose, is where he spoke of people 'seeing' only as one might see shadows cast onto a wall...

Ultraviolet in the deep green forest....
It's a catastrophe of science.


If you are a person who experiences life at depth, and I do mean physical things of life, then the first thing you realize upon reflection, is that there are shortcomings.

The most peak experience of the human being is only a momentary snapshot, and then declines and fades and the material structures involved all decay and eventually are effectively destroyed in time.

Energy and light however, cannot be destroyed.

And therein hangs a tale for you to think about when it comes to deciding what is 'God' and where God is.

And only when you have a resonating relationship with something clearly outside of your organic containment, will you be able to find Truth. That is to say, the Truth of which you are a permanent Seeker whilst ever you are just a mortal.

Every single thing you can buy in this world, is 'mortal.'

It does not matter how materially 'rich' you are, I don't care; it matters not one jot to me.

And I mean that most sincerely, and after having read this you know that I do sincerely mean it.


You cannot 'buy' a being of light to stand before you and communicate with you.

Theoretically, according to Paul, I think -, 'Satan is transformed into an angel of Light.' But Paul is wrong.

Satan cannot be literally transformed into any kind of Light at all; he would be destroyed. 

I think Paul means that he - Satan - tries to make out that he is a messenger of knowledge - like scientists do.

Satan is a manifestly physical material automaton. He has no consciousness because he has no Light in him.

Satan is process - or, a process.

Light is a thing. 

A material molecular thing not light itself that has organised dynamical processes can seem to be 'alive,' or it is alive for some terminating linear phase. But that's all it is.

If you ever had a being of intelligent light standing in front of you, it would never ever be anything Satanic; and it would not be Satan.

You already know who 'Satan' is or at least what it/he is: it is the organised neural network contained within a human-like physical structure, with deficient biophoton patterns.

And you can identify Satan all over the place when you look for him/it.

A scientist who cannot communicate with Light is not a scientist, he's a fraud.



3 comments:

  1. Johhny Depp: "Why the Devil?"

    Barbara Jefford: "I saw him one day. I was 15 years old and I saw him as plain as I see you now. It was love at first sight."
    - The Ninth Gate

    https://youtu.be/XmrBIlZIBlo

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Not the devil again. I'd rather get back to "Irene"

      Delete

Your considered comments are welcome