'Pop Culture Does Not Represent Them.'

Those are some of the words of one of our commentators here - they posted a comment down below the last article basically to the effect that there are modern cultural styles that are authentically presenting masculine figures, but these are out in the non-urban areas, and they are virtually never given much positive attention in the popular media. 

When you are living out in the rural regions or in the wilderness or any less-than-urban areas, by force of necessity you have to be capable of solving material problems and you have to deal realistically with real situations - in short, there is little scope to 'explore,' to 'meander' into the modern urban effeminate affectations.

I have no problem entertaining dispute or debate about what really constitutes 'effeminacy' as I seem to have pitched the term here just now.

Actually I am not someone who believes there are no such things at all as naturally effeminate individuals, or even that there are no such things as naturally homosexual people - I just do sense there is an agenda at work in the modern day however, which is in essence and at heart not at all interested in the rights of any such people. And I further think there are grounds to believe the agenda is extraordinarily dangerous and capable of ripping power from individuals as vital human participants in human society, and substituting a top-down ideology in which you cannot see who is sitting at the top.

You see people can argue, they can debate, they can tussle and tug at each other's hold on the moral prevalence at any given moment - because even if it were the case that we had some amazing mathematical calculus for 'solving' precisely, the given questions we have about gender, sex, equality, social rights and responsibilities and even duties, the fact is life is dynamic and many things about it change continuously. Which is the reason many minds have to present their various views and the best judgement reached in important matters.

Some absolute principals always hold but only in the same sense that Pythagoras's Theorem always holds - yet it NEVER materially exists by nature nor can it be found in a perfect template in the material Universe, and many things change all the time around the non-material but absolutely real, principal that governs the theorem.

I guess what I mean to say is that there are sound logically and philosophical grounds to grab onto a 'vision,' or many aligned visions about what it means to be a good human being, a good man, a good woman, a decent person - and just for right now, icons of traditional masculinity, and traditional femininity, are pole stars. They are important. Because via them you can see what 'games' other people are playing who are only seeking to deliberately confuse and to unsettle. We are smart - we know how to distinguish between irony and dissembling.

Here's Dorothea Taylor - she's a pro-drummer who recently went viral with a short video clip of herself hitting the skins on 'Down With The Sickness' - a heavy HEAVY piece by 'Disturbed.' 

Now as you all know well and truly by now, because I've been on about it for a while, I am right now finishing a collaborative effort with some women who are still highly 'active and not yet ready for retirement' - I think that's the phrase I was given... LOL

And over the next few articles there will be a few 'interesting' bits and pieces for ya, leading up to what will be released into the 'Q'-a-sphere as 'Disclosure - Rainbow Bombs.' But you don't need to know about that yet. I'm just letting it DROP here and now in case the seeping out that is already on-going gets to people who say hey why didn't you tell us?

I have been telling you. But some of you are still worrying about the wrong things.

So, 'Q drops,' eh... Rainbow Bombs. That's what will drop.

Remember what I just said.