Autism Project Donations:

Autism Project Donations here - https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=23MBUB4W8AL7E

Tuesday 11 June 2019

The Problem With Our 'Science.'

I'm posting this article for some friends around the place and also for all of those who read here and are moved to ponder on the hypotheses on their own.

When you read media articles and 'news' in which the phrase 'science' is used - or anything like 'scientifically based,' or 'proved by science' and so on - I think it pays to be aware that for those of us who are deep conspiracy theorists(!) consider that there is a deliberate legal use of the word (and phrases) going on there.
One-time Head of MI6, on the left there.

There is a legal standard for the use of calling upon 'science' as any kind of evidence for anything. This is called the 'Rye-Daubert Standard' and it came into existence in 1923.

After 1923 the formal standard was altered and modified several times, the last time being in 1993.

It is my view that the standards suffer from genuine, serious deficiencies. And that these have been 'allowed' in there deliberately. They are designed to deceive, and to mislead, and to exploit people's ignorance for malevolence and someone's illegitimate gain.

Consequently, you cannot rely on anything - billed as contemporary science - widely spread about, and in the media certainly, as being something you can take for granted as really having been proven anywhere at anytime in terms of logic, mathematics, or functioning factual knowledge (which is the real definition of 'science.').
What are these guys? Politicians, lawyers, scientists...? 
...Because when challenged they will always default to 'having obeyed' the legalistic standard for the introduction of 'scientific evidence' as their unarguable defense, and con you (and if not you now, then certainly the ignorant general public) into assuming this is the same thing as actual scientific proof; it's no more than an admissible allegation - if you can put it in those terms. The fact is, by manipulating the process into simply an exploitable political tool, it's no longer science at all, in reality. They have utterly hi-jacked the word and its authentic meaning. 

No comments:

Post a Comment

Your considered comments are welcome