When you read media articles and 'news' in which the phrase 'science' is used - or anything like 'scientifically based,' or 'proved by science' and so on - I think it pays to be aware that for those of us who are deep conspiracy theorists(!) consider that there is a deliberate legal use of the word (and phrases) going on there.
One-time Head of MI6, on the left there. |
There is a legal standard for the use of calling upon 'science' as any kind of evidence for anything. This is called the 'Rye-Daubert Standard' and it came into existence in 1923.
After 1923 the formal standard was altered and modified several times, the last time being in 1993.
It is my view that the standards suffer from genuine, serious deficiencies. And that these have been 'allowed' in there deliberately. They are designed to deceive, and to mislead, and to exploit people's ignorance for malevolence and someone's illegitimate gain.
Consequently, you cannot rely on anything - billed as contemporary science - widely spread about, and in the media certainly, as being something you can take for granted as really having been proven anywhere at anytime in terms of logic, mathematics, or functioning factual knowledge (which is the real definition of 'science.').
What are these guys? Politicians, lawyers, scientists...? |
No comments:
Post a Comment
Your considered comments are welcome