SECRETS for you who read here...

Now look here, I will post this article up, and then after awhile, I will probably simply HAVE to delete it. (Edited/New: have deleted only some parts...)

There are things which, were they widely known to the public and to the media at large, would be apt to be taken the entirely wrong way.

What I intend to do in the upcoming few blog-posts is show all of you who come here regularly and read (and of course, I can see from the site stats that there are a few of you...) how you can make some money basically from zilch to begin with, using social media and advanced sophisticated networks that function on-line. Obviously by now most or all of you know that you can make micro-parts of Bitcoin and other crypt-currencies very easily via the iFaucet sites and processes. And all you require to have is a digital wallet, which is something free to acquire. Still, even this approach may not suit you and, indeed, it was much more favorable when the price of Bitcoin was lower - before its first big climb.

Quickly, to summarize some important elements:

1. Twitter account is free

2. iFaucet registering is free

3. A digital wallet so that you can receive money is free

Now the thing that is something akin to a loaded gun, in the hands of the general media, is that groups like Kaspersky and various RUSSIAN technical consultants were around the place pretty openly about four or five years ago, and were attempting to spread the message of 'expanding populations' on-line and in social media. [A section deleted here] And so, this is the element that I cannot allow to remain 'uploaded' in this or any other post after awhile. [And has been deleted].

Now what 'design aesthetics' is this...?

This is how these things (rapidly expanding populations in a social media matrix) work - the Google search function critically operates off prioritized digital information delivery channels such as Twitter (or most other of the well-known ones - Snapchat, Tumblr, stuff like that). So that, if you have a 'label' or name for a certain commercial product, for instance, it will not necessarily easily show up on people's Google searchers - but if that same 'label' is repeated even just a few times on Twitter and so-called 're-tweeted,' then the 'label' and its web-address leaps to the top of the search results.

[Another bit deleted here].

Now here's a practical instance that draws on the commercial products of someone that I know reads here - he produces a small, highly-portable, flat-pack-able, battery wiring accessory, which makes it possible to have any DC current output from any kinds of available (and different) batteries, and, his product also enables wireless re-charging. This is an amazing thing for the military, for crisis response teams, for those infamous 'doomsday preppers,' for roadside breakdown kits - indeed for many many kinds of applications. And it's a very inexpensive product.

And no one much knows about it.

Well, every one of you here could get a Twitter account, tweet about it using one key phrase, and the next thing you know, he could have ten million people become aware of his product.

...For example.

And there could be a lot of other things you (or 'we') could do - especially if any of you guys come up with some suggestions. 

Absorb This First...

Here is a pic of the latest Zagato Design Center treatment of an already amazing automotive - the Aston Martin Vanquish:

The Zagato AM Vanquish

So, I suppose everyone generally accepts that Italy plays a very strong hand in the world of industrial design. Zagato is an obvious and visible 'name' (to car aficionados) of one of the countless ateliers and industrial design studios that exist in Italy.

American industrialists may argue that it is the US that produces the true leading edge of 'design' in the modern world because of the leading role it plays in high speed assembly technology/automated production lines, and in computing and industrial chemicals - all of these elements have led to widespread and commercial and practical utility that the US provides for markets across the globe. And you cannot argue with that proposition when it comes to ranking which country contributes most financially, to industrial creativity and design... Because of the post-WWII 'Marshall Plan,' it is really American know-how and management that produced the economic miracles of Japan and Germany. 

However another way to look at things is to consider the aesthetic aspect of design - and when you go down this route, you inevitably end up in Italy.

Aesthetics is a study of the mind which concerns how our brains interpret things as being ugly, or beautiful. But 'aesthetics' in the most sophisticated modern sense, is also a language with a large and complex vocabulary - and which spans all the senses. The Italians have a lot of words which convey highly-nuanced meanings: 'spianato' for instance, is a word seen in classical music - EG 'Chopin's Andante Spianato.' It means 'smoothed.' In industrial design you can start with a solid shape that has - begins with - sharp edges, and then when you smooth those edges down you get a different final object, with a totally different visual and tactile sense about what it, the object, is or is meant to be compared with the underlying original basic model.

Because we live in a world today in which it has become 'normal' to have a design 'brutalism' expressed in ordinary usual communications, a virtually only semiotic language with no grammar, complex syntax, or subtlety, we would ordinarily never even realize when sophisticated people are employing a complete language in front of our eyes using some other sensory channel than that of words and hearing...

A photograph taken by Brutalism Architecture
photographer, Deane Madsen

A Slightly Silly Example

Okay well it might seem like a silly example...

Culture, at least I believe anyway, is tied to the economic tides. Because it is superficially the story these days, that everyone cares exclusively about science and facts and evidence (they don't; they are psychologically motivated through feelings and not through logic virtually at all), academia in particular fails to preserve cultural memory and is a deep black sink-hole for social and cultural knowledge memory.

There is no more outstanding an example to my idiosyncratic mind, than when it comes to the recipe for an 'American Sundae.' (There's the silly example bit!).

Fortnum and Mason's American Sundae,
not far off but still not the real thing

All the same, regardless of whether you think this example is silly or not, you will not find anywhere on-line any recipe or photograph for and of a genuine original 'American Sundae.' You will find countless (literally countless) things that look like an American Sundae, but you will not find one single actual American Sundae...  

Now who do we blame for this exemplary evil omission? Oxford University? Cambridge, where Stefan Halper lectures? Harvard? Yale? Princeton? ...Where?

The Sundae is a story tied to technology (the invention and industrial manufacture and widespread commercialization of refrigeration systems), and to war and patriotism, as well as to big money.

What happens if we get 'the Roaring Twenties' again?

John Jacob Astor IV is intimately associated with the invention of certain iterations of the general basic ice cream parfait, which became famous among the very well-to-do and the upper crust. Now I have been into this aspect somewhere previously but this time, I shall simply skip to the actual recipe - or so much of it which will allow you to understand that I am fundamentally correct here: nobody today has much remaining social-cultural memory of what exactly the 'Old Glory Ice Cream Sundae' is.

Categorically, it was first invented by an African-American cook. He styled his invention after the American flag - aka 'Old Glory.'

As you know, the American flag consists of 'the stars and stripes.' And the colors are Old Glory red, white, and Old Glory blue. The study of flags is known as 'vexillology.' The American athlete Martin Sheridan, said: 'this flag dips to no earthly king.'

Some people have proposed that the stars are meant to have originally been gold because gold doesn't tarnish, although they may have been originally silver, which does tarnish and turn black or green.

I have no fixed or firm view of it other than that I know what the original 'Old Glory Ice Cream Sundae' is. It includes vanilla ice cream, and cherry syrup and strawberry ice cream, and something which appears like 'star dust.' And I will not go into the 'Old Glory blue' aspect because I'm keeping most of the recipe a secret; still.

Astor owned the Knickerbocker hotel at a time when the the US was flooded with money, and when the Knickerbocker ballroom actually had specific velvet roped-off areas marked 'champagne only.' And tickets into these areas went for hundreds of dollars when the price of a hotel room for the night was $2. 

Afterwards, of course, you had the Prohibition Era - 1920 to 1933. But until then, the Knickerbocker was probably one of the most alcoholic-indulged places on the planet ever outside of Bacchus's palace!

The 'Old Glory Ice Cream Sundae' contains copious amounts of alcohol. The colt cherries or maraschino cherries used are steeped in maraschino brandy, for one thing.   

Minister Anthony Loke Cancels MH370 Search

I am utterly no fan at all of Malaysia's Mahathir Mohamad, but the very first thing his new Minister for Transport Anthony Loke did when assuming that office, was to announce the immediate cancelling of the search for the missing Malaysian Airliner, MH370.

The total amounts of money that have been spent by a range of countries is uncountable, in the sense that largely, the expenditure is not transparent. Firstly, the so-called Joint Agency Coordination Center was lead by an ostensibly 'Australian' identity, retired Air Chief Marshal Sir Angus Houston, with the Australian government agreeing to spend $200 million dollars on the search, the People's Republic of China spending $20 million, and the Malaysian government $120 million.

Anthony Loke aka Asian rapper 'Ton-loc.' Not.

On top of that there have been various payments to consultants, offshore (mainly US and European) contractors, and suppliers of in one case, $60 million directly from the Malaysian government to one particular US service provider and contractor. Additionally of course, there are insurance pay-outs to families. 

The funny thing about huge troughs of cash... ...especially those initiated by governments and politicians - they virtually never achieve their stated actual goals but do still manage to 'spread the love' around their little circles.

And I'll not say any more about that. Nod nod wink wink, know what I mean?

Sir Angus received the US National Intelligence Distinguished Service Medal in 2011. 

...Let it never be forgotten, that who set up the Pakistan Army in the very first place directly after Partition - who else, than, yes, the Australian Army. They love us in Pakistan and we understand them and why not? You show me the money and I'll prove to you cows walk on the moon too.

A spicy hot-sour soup - Russian chilies in there, too,
as you can see. 

It's all about the money boys and girls. It's always about the money - sure Stefan Halper is a lunatic, but in the end, his masters in Whitehall are not that crazy and need the bribes from those run-away ex-Russian oligarchs that hate VV Putin and friends. What, do you seriously think the average UK politician is in it for the good of the people??? LOL 

The Question Is, Can They Handle It?

The question is whether the slightly-above-average-intelligence, member of the public in the USA, will be able to handle the truth when it all eventually comes out - or whether it will just have to be the case that people such as William Binney or Jerome Corsi will have to live with enough of the truth getting out to enable things getting back on a level keel.

I mean it's just not ever been said - if you notice - just exactly how, realistically, the Putin Kremlin ever did succeed in actually, once again, realistically, helping Donald Trump attain the Presidency. A handful of trolls going on-line simply doesn't cut it.

And although 'they' tried (the MSM and the Democrats and so on) to float the story that Viktor Vekselberg donated a lot of money to Trump, or to the Trump Campaign, and that he and other Russians assisted in 'laundering' money through Moscow for Trump (I mean so what of it, even if it were true which it isn't?!) - it just plain simply did not ever happen; none of those things stand up to hard scrutiny.

Sir Angus Houston
First he was head of the Joint Agency Coordination
Center trying to find MH370, then, he was Special Envoy to the Ukraine to
meddle around with MH17. Born in the UK, emigrated to Aus in 1968

So in what real ways might have Vladimir Putin helped Donald Trump into office? You see one of the problems with the narrative about Russia, is that both Ed Snowden and Julian Assange raised the alarm about what Obama and Clinton were doing long before Russia got into the story at all - and in fact, Russia failed to ever fulsomely believe or accept Snowden's bona fides as an actual 'whistleblower' and honest asylum seeker, and they have never backed Assange either. There are simply zero facts to support any indication of Russia ever having helped Julian Assange at all. Nerds and geeks helped Assange and some of the key ones were even Democrat sympathizers! 

And even right as we speak, the main direction of the ordinary media's coverage is to do with the fact that clearly the FBI was acting on things LONG BEFORE the Steele dossier, and LONG BEFORE they claimed they were suspecting some kind of Russian entry into the Trump Campaign.

So here's the problem see - what if they were reacting to something but not to anything that was obviously Russian as such in the first instance, and what if they indeed rightly feared someone was going to upset their apple-cart and have installed some outsider (IE Trump)? And what if they got blind-sided by their own 'conscience' over having just stiffed the Russians over Yanukovych in the Ukraine, and became obsessed and fixated on Russia when, well, in fact they were initially trying to uncover something real enough, it was just not Russia though that they were 'seeing,' which was simply a mirage they chased that served to cover over the genuine 'thing.'

See people have very weak memories: the scandal was to do with the NSA bugging you... It was not ever to do with them bugging or wiretapping Donald Trump whom no one had ever heard of (that much) in context of someone running for highest office AT THE TIME WHEN THE FBI ACTUALLY FIRST STARTED THIS 'OPERATION' of theirs that they are now running for cover about. But then suddenly because of the political consequences of his having run so well, and then having won as well, the whole thing has turned into this media circus focusing on Donald Trump.

It's not about Trump. It's about you.

Assange said, and Snowden confirmed, that they were bugging you.

Sir Alex Allan,
head of the UK's blah blah blah et cetera

Oh, and me. But then I knew they were bugging me because I was one of the senior (commercial arena) managers of the top NSA programmers run from out of the SEA station. Happens to be also, that I was a long-time asset of someone's... I'll not say whose (asset). More to the point, although I was 'just an asset' rather than an operative, I had had very very sophisticated training early on due to some program which was eventually put on the shelf and not followed-through on.

And then miracle of miracles, we stumbled (there is a 'we' of us, not just a 'me') onto this insane venture of MI6's - 'the Five Eyes' idiocy, right under our very noses, literally head-quartered right next to our business!

Now it's time for me to give old Sir Richard Dearlove and Sir Alex Allan a clue on how come we found out about them and what they were up to... It's okay now because they are nailed to the ground. Nailed! I was a proposed protected witness in the 'WA Inc' Royal Commission but I never showed; my boss did and he became what's called here a 'super grass!!' And, at one point during the hearings, they convened the court at night in St Georges Terrace here (the main financial drag), and got the court to wear these special glasses, you see. Anyhew... The whole about fifteen to fifty foot level above the street and footpath was crisscrossed with red laser beams! And these were the beams from the audio-visual bugging devices being used largely by commercial operators against all the stock brokers and bankers, and federal cops and so on, and even George Soros's office, which was right here in Allendale Square! 

Now the brother of my boss was the station chief of the Yugoslavian Secret Service, at the same time as he was in the Reserve Bank of Australia, and, although I never personally did any of this 'bugging' and electronic monkey-business myself, I used to get segments of reports that might have been useful to our investment business from that source.

Get it? I knew, from the second day that Alex Allan started propositioning the then Premier of Western Australia Dr Geoffrey Gallop, about being allowed to run a covert Intelligence program here - albeit it was on an official co-operative basis (although I still think it was illegal and improper in the way they did it), where he was doing it, what he was doing, and simply everything about it. And so did the US Embassy know.

The only people who thought it was a secret was the UK government and the Western Australian political officials on both sides of the aisle, and the government employees who were part of the operation.

So then something else happened. The Kremlin (and others, including Serbian officials, and hugely wealthy Americans) tasked someone, to seed something into the NSA covert traffic.

And that's what happened. With the effect that they (MI6 and the NSA's Intel receivers in the White House) took off on this wild goose chase using Christopher Steele to report ON THE SEEDED FALSE TRAIL.

Yes, they traced some 'hacks' and bot programs to 'Lumumba' with certain Russian key phrases inside the coding - but it was 'Lumumba Hall,' which is in Belgrade University, not Moscow's 'Lumumba University' in Moscow!

Girl in a car with red seats

The Serbs were very pissed about Clinton's idiotic bombing of Serbia, and the CIA under Brennan actually thought that because Flynn was very openly anti-Islam - he must have been under the sway of RUSSIAN influence because they had supported Serbia against the Islamic sides in that war. Actually, he was just anti-Islamic terrorism generally, because, well, he was against it. And that's all. Brennan's CIA was errant and fixated about Russia. Russia had no, or very little, hand in anything.

But then something else happened, which was really hugely disturbing to the White House, and that was that Donald Trump began to be the beneficiary of public 'revelations' from Assange and Snowden and others that were extremely damaging to Hillary and to the Democrats - and this was seen as being the product of Russian Secret Intelligence activity. It wasn't.

...Partly, it was the product of AMERICAN Intelligence Services pro-activity in support of Donald Trump. 

Carter Page wearing a RED HAT! OMG

MI6 made the same mistake about Carter Page - because he read the play of recent history on the side of the Serbs and the Russians versus NATO and the Eu-Commission - they thought he simply must have been a Russian spy and/or operative. And they have said so. They are wrong, as the courts have told them.

Now the question is, can the US public handle it?

Can they handle that someone, but not 'the Russians' had a sense of the NSA surveillance and how wide it was, and decided to check that, and then, when they proved to themselves how bad it was, they turned that against the NSA and the CIA and MI6. Result? The following - 

Fact:

Clinton got booted.

Fact:

MI6 got uncovered.

Fact:

Trump got elected.

Fact:

Steele got smashed for the fool that he always was.

Fact:

Brennan got booted.

Fact:

Comey got booted.

So to be honest with you all, at this stage, I'm not particularly afraid of these guys (IE the above-mentioned names and anyone associated with that side of the arm-wrestle). I am always afraid of things getting too early into the public sphere where they can be twisted around (IE. used for wrong motives).

...Now so far we have just been drip-feeding out stuff close to the edge of the curve, even though if you're honest you'll grant it was almost always ahead of what was in the public domain. I mean, obviously we're not the only people who have been putting inside stuff out to the public from real sources. Hey, we 'know' there are 12 Russian trolls/bots also doing it! Don't we (know that)? 

...but now, he's wearing a blue hat, sadly!

For example, to this minute, although I saw Bill Still and Sean Hannity use the name 'Obama' in connection to Halper nobody has yet said he was actually meeting personally with Halper. But I have said it here. Lt General Flynn's son is verging on saying it openly on his Twitter feed over the last few days.

This has been a criminal enterprise by John Brennan and Stefan Halper (and by implication with him of course MI6) and James Comey and Barack Obama, and now also by Robert Mueller. It's the biggest scandal of all time to do with the US Republic and its agencies. It's not a political scandal, it's a criminal scandal.

Shortly, I will - 'we,' will - be putting some things out there that are far off the edge of the curve; they will be about the not-so-immediate future. No way will the media suddenly follow up the next day or the next week repeating what we post here. But you can benefit by keeping what is posted, in mind, when you consider what is going on in front of your eyes and what it will probably mean.

You can make a lot of money just sticking your bucket, not where you see the money flowing right now, but where you can estimate it might flow, if our strategic analysis turns out to be better than what you might get from these types of 'geniuses' and 'experts' and 'powerful' people - you know, like: Clapper and Brennan and Clinton and Obama and Comey and Mueller and 'SIR' Richard Dearlove or 'Professor' Stefan Halper.

Trust me here (I know people decry that phrase...) but if you went to a lecture by Carter Page, in which his eyes looked straight ahead, and his slightly gormless grin was fixed on that open face and he nodded when he should have shaken his head and so on -, you might learn a thing or two, if you could read carefully between the lines. I mean, hey, he has a Cannondale Mountain Bike, after all! What does that tell you? Bill... What do you think?

The real answer is 'we don't know.' LOL And that's the difference between a professional and a bunch of amateurs, eh Sir Richard...

The Dinosaur Crashes To The Ground!

Robert Mueller - the gift that just keeps on giving.

Funny thing about the Great Game (and this is for you too, young Kimball O'Hara, well actually especially), is that it is almost never truly clear what sides there are and who is on which side or the other.

'Our side' is good, their side is bad... Some people don't even believe that - they think 'our side' is our side, and their side is just, not our side and that's all that matters.

Their side is maybe, not bad, it's just not our side, that's all.

I don't go along with that kind of thinking. People who are bad are not on 'our side.'

Which leaves me with this little tidbit for the day, which you have not heard anywhere else just yet unless you read Lee Stranahan's twitter feed or watch the Alex Jones Channel because I have managed to get the word out in those places about ten minutes ago...

Barack Obama was a member of the same Washington private club that the FBI spy, Stefan Halper went to.

Let's see Mueller jump over that one!

My my. 

It's Impossible...

For me to keep my mouth shut!

Here is a pic of the insides of a place called the 'Cosmos Club,' in Washington, D.C.

And yep, I could blow these fools out of the water at any time.

So, I'll just pick that time...

...And who would be a member of the 'Cosmos Club?'

None other than one Pommie character - by name, Stefan Halper, that's who.

Oh dear, dear. Tell me you're just making this stuff up, Johnnie.

Baselworld

Baselworld, as you all know, is this trade fair for watch-makers, held each year in Basel in a dedicated pavilion now with several specialist, added-on halls for specific kinds of designs and innovations.

I'm not sure whether I've said it before in this Blog, but I have been saying to several friends in a one-to-one setting that I've had the distinct impression ever since around the time a little bit before the Trump election, that there has been a drop-off in spending on luxury goods, a drop-off in the advertising in that sector, and a general decline in the visual presence of apparent 'wealth' everywhere.

This year's (2018) Baselworld figures completely supported that view, because there was a HUGE drop-off in the number of exhibitors, in fact roughly a half of them failed to show this year.

Boy, that's some drop-off.

Surely it could not have been the case that Hillary Clinton and all the people in that camp were the 'wealthy' people in the world and now they have all become pee'd off and taken their bat and ball away and gone into hiding...?

Answer: well YES! Yes, it was them. And yes, they were the wealthy people, because stealing from the public makes you rich!

They must have all consulted with their psychics just during the run-up to the US election, who all said that Hillary would be wiped out, and that would spell disaster for them and spell the end to their gravy train. What a shame.

'Cuz now that only leaves me and thee and maybe three other guys around the whole entire world with any real interest in spending attrocious and unjustifiable large sums of money on silly stoopid things and we ain't got any money anyway... Shame.

Well, actually I have a lot of money but I'm waiting for the interest rates to sky-rocket even more in the US and then all of a sudden I'll 'find' this satchel that I'd left or lost somewhere prolly in the garden shed out the back, or sumthin'...

Anyway so I gotta tell yer about expensive watches at Baselworld, see.

I have this big problem deciding what to spend my last half million on each time I get down to that 'nuther 'last half million' - on the one hand, people would at least notice me being driven up to the front doors of His Majesty's Theater in the heart of the city here, late, and in fact just to watch the catalog song from Don Giovanni out in the hall via the closed circuit screens, drink a glass of champagne and then toddle off to Billy Lee's to eat some Chinese dinner; if I were driven in a relatively decent Rolls.

This is 'just' a Casio, but it is made with Samurai sword
'murasaki-gane' gold alloy - around $7,000.

No one, absolutely no one though, would notice if I walked past the front doors, or went in ('to catch the catalog song from Don Giovanni...' LOL) wearing just a Gran Sasso Nile Cotton pullover and black slacks ($2,000), kangaroo hide slippers handmade bespoke from a Sydney crafts-person ($3,000), and a '*' (ain't tellin' you) brand Westminster chime tourbillon ($500,000) on my wrist - and I'd have had to borrow cash for the clothes and shoes.

There are a lot of things that make such watches so expensive, but one of them these days is the amazing new kinds of metals and glass or optically-clear materials and strange alloys.

One of the most amazing things they do nowadays is create these strange alloys of pure gold (around 75%) and ultra high grade ceramics, the latter of which is a porous substance and harder than gold - most of the really best watch internal mechanisms are made from 'Mich-au' or 'Michaud' or sometimes also called 'Michor;' combinations of ceramic and pure gold.

There is not much point trying to tell people who are not already 'in the sickness' for expensive watches and things like that, about the significance of design and the brilliance of particular designers.

No no no. Waste of time. Ding Dong!

'Obscured Meanings:' 'Legacy Preference...' OxCam

You wouldn't believe that such extraordinary lengths are taken to cause a deliberate obscuring of facts about even quite recent history on the internet - but it is so.

I have personal knowledge of people who attended Oxford or Cambridge Universities... ...who literally screwed up their degree certificates and threw them in the waste paper bin. You probably won't believe this but it is true that a handful of people did do this.

When you look up the phrase 'legacy preference to University' you will find a consistent swathe of publications on-line almost everywhere talking about the abolishing 'long long ago' of preferential granting of applications from those whose family members HAD ATTENDED one or other of the great Universities. Therefore to make it seem that entry by academic merit must be 'the natural opposite' and the 'democratic and fairer' system that would replace 'family privilege' and unfair 'entitlement.'  

Now...

...that is not what the phrase really means though, does it!

So why do they do this kind of thing? Is there a propaganda element at stake? 

Most certainly. Of course.

And I am going to point this out in an attempt to pin-point the era around which things went badly off the rails for the United Kingdom government and society at the top where decisions are made.

Functionally the matter had been simmering away literally for decades and might have been the product of Post-War social disconnectedness; too many leaders having died in the war itself, too much of the fabric of society that had gone into positive development and social and intellectual progress being destroyed.

The UK Labor Party Prime Minister James Callaghan was at the core 'turning point' really - he shifted to the Right on economic policy with the effect that the purely (IE 'only' or extremely predominantly) meritocratic basis for academic position - which was prized by the economically poorer Left Wing people - was abandoned in favor of the most simplistic economic rationale.

This looks like a scene from the Sony Playstation '007' game.
Haspel knows the plots that have been foiled BY THE CIA, not MI6.
Sir Richard Dearlove thinks Islamic Terrorism is 'overstated.'

You see, up until Thatcher, entry to Oxford and Cambridge was also in some percentage (not only, but at least to a certain percentage) facilitated to favor those WHOSE PARENTS OR CLOSE FAMILY MEMBERS HAD EXCELLED ACADEMICALLY AT THOSE UNIVERSITIES...

It was not merely, 'that a family member had attended.' 

Now this is meaningfully different to just some kind of weak idea of patronage. This is about the perceived value of a continuance of academic legacy. Legacy preference in some degree provides some small hint at a moral compass!

It seems to the dumbed-down only a subtle and small difference, but it was significant enough in the minds of those who threw their 'qualifications' away in disgust, to really matter. And they knew, and foresaw - very correctly - that there would inevitably be a rise to the very top by those highly corruptible people who were motivated by money and power, and who of course, had in fact already used money and power to get places anyway. At every step and stage - be it Eton or some other name school - how much you paid saw to it that your grades and chances benefited, and thus, all else just fell to you like so many dominoes. And this also implied that not only did those who paid money 'get places,' but certainly, there was already a pervasive atmosphere dominated by those who were in fact permissive about ego and 'advantages through bribes.'

This is the crude kinds of people who are running the United Kingdom now - and about whom Julian Assange says 'they are a nefarious lot who are in control of the place.' He bluntly warned Donald Trump not to visit. I take a slightly different perspective from Assange's - which is namely, that the same kinds of people are also cowards and only can do things behind someone's back and in the shadows. They will, I think, smile thinly on the outside to Trump, were he to venture to London, and make a show in public. But they are not to be trusted in any serious way and you cannot guarantee what they might be up to behind your back; that much I also hold to be true along with Mr. Assange.

Several FBI 'Moles' And Why This Is Important To Markets

The media is likely to jump to incorrect conclusions about what has been going on, and what is currently going on inside the Trump White House, as soon as more names are revealed.

I have already specified from a long long time ago that the UK's Secret Intelligence Service (MI6) was involved, and I mean AT THE TOP because of strategy and policy THAT THEY ARE MAKING -  I talked about Sir Alex Allan and mentioned ex-London Met Deputy John Yates; but these names were discussed here only because they already had profile to do with 'dubious' activities and events (the Leveson Media Illegal Wire-Tapping Inquiry, and illegal listening-in to various South East Asian heads of state). They are not the main strategic thinkers at all.

I mean I've known for a long while who ALL the figures are and I could name names that are unlikely to EVER appear in the public media!

As far as the actual FBI 'moles' inside the Trump Campaign are concerned, I will add the name of Alex Nix to the shortlist of those already 'outed' because as soon as his name becomes more obvious in the wider MSM, then it will be easy for people to jump to completely incorrect conclusions: Robert Mercer, who paid Nix whilst he was running Cambridge Analytica, is ONE OF THE US MILINT ASSETS WHO EXPOSED NIX AND HALPER! Mercer is a 'good guy.'

This thing is so far-reaching and has so many highly-placed and really big-time power-brokers involved and with such enormous ambit of nefarious spider-webbing, that once the White House turns up the heat on the conspirators - there is likely to be extreme reactions.

Najib Razak

I mean, even as we speak, can you imagine what would be the consequence, if Najib Razak spilled the beans on all those previously 'connected folk' in NYC and Washington and London who arranged for him to 'disappear' the billions of dollars he was given to shut up about the missing airliner scam...

We are talking about people with HUGE egos getting caught and stuck into the spotlight - and you can hardly see a bigger ego than to witness the comments of Sir Richard Dearlove, actually 'opine' in his expert view, that 'there is some substance to what is in his friend/colleague Christopher Steele's 'dossier.'

The reality is there is no substance at all - so why on earth would someone with as significant a past CV as Dearlove, ex-Chief of MI6, say something as obviously false and tendentious and aggressively anti an elected sitting US President, as what he did say, and in the way he said it? It was a lie, it was false, and he knew it to be false when the words were carefully sent out of his lips after the carefully pre-planned question was put by the BBC interviewer.

No. It's not just 'FBI moles' that are the important fact here - it is who is ultimately behind them, and what was their agenda. And frankly, how did they even know Donald Trump was such a real threat to beat the utterly corrupted Hillary Clinton from such a long a way off from the eventual election? 

Things are never really what they look like, are they. It was never Russian spies and operatives who arranged the election for Trump - it was somebody that made sure that INTERFERENCE FROM MI6(!) and Dearlove and Halper and Nix and the rest (there are a lot of others) was curtailed.

I keep saying this, but I have a document from a Russian source which I will release as soon as the Mueller nonsense is brought to a complete and formal halt. And when you read it it will make your head spin. 

There is no prospect US markets can fall on the strength of current economic data - but if London and what is behind that crowd go nuts and turn nasty because of being found out and pinned to the wall under the spotlight so to speak, they might try to Crash everything out of anger. Personally, if I were looking at it, I would seek to confiscate all the capital of anyone who was involved in subverting the US FBI to spy on US citizens without cause.

Now wouldn't that be amusing.

Might even make Assange chuckle.

As The FBI 'Mole' Is Revealed

Well don't ever forget I told you first.

The 'extract' from the Russian book I posted as a free downloadable PDF SPECIFIED London Secret Service involvement in all of this.

There is a ton of literally 'fake news' or, more properly, deliberate propaganda being pushed on-line and even in the conventional print media at the moment, trying to so-called 'walk back' the Wall Street Journal's Kimberley Strassel's revelation regarding a possible FBI 'mole' inside the Trump Campaign.

The thrust of this 'walk-back' is that there were 'unwitting sources' within the Trump Campaign, and those being named are of course Carter Page, but also George Papadopoulos - but this is simply not the case at all. There definitely was a real mole, at least one, and that person is 'being rumored across the Web' as Stefan Halper, an associate of the one-time Chief of the UK Secret Intelligence Service aka 'MI6' - Sir Richard Dearlove.

To some extent I am personally extremely gratified that being one of those who have kept the embargo rule to do with the basis document from which the extract I posted was taken, Robert Mueller has found himself floundering somewhat for want of 'the fire.' Or maybe 'the light...'

Soon enough Mueller will be completely shut down.

And then I will freely reveal the document in question. The assistance this kind of document can be to you, or to someone who cares about what they are doing, is that through the lens it provides you, your enemies will be revealed. And when you know your enemy and where they go hunting, you can stay away from that part of the forest, especially once the fight-to-the-death begins between the top-line predators. Which it will. In fact, it's already begun, has it not?!

Blend 17

And then comes the time when you are able to purchase your own personal 'first Rolls Royce.'

Suddenly you see that the truly rich, the truly self-reliant and self-made - are not merely unique people but they are also very often alone, or at least kind of 'lonely.'

It's all just for you. The rich lifestyle is a lonely experience;
basically, it's just you.

You will observe how selfish the experience of buying and owning your first Rolls Royce really is. I mean, sure, there are a lot of short videos on YouTube that appear to show people who own them, or things similar to them, but there is something missing from the statements being made in all those videos about the actual experience, which is namely, the sheer personal and very lonely nature of the experience. You can't really share the actual experience itself in the sense of the commonality of feelings except to someone else who is doing the same thing at the exact same time...

And you know, there are a lot of people who wouldn't even like or at all appreciate owning the thing in the first place. My wife's aunt forced her husband to send back the Rolls he bought because she thought it was far too pretentious a thing to own - now bearing in mind this is a fellow who owns an authentic Da Vinci or Michelangelo painting...! ...I'm never sure which and I don't ask. 

Who can share this experience, this frustration and inability to explain the feelings involved to the rest of society which simply just does not understand?

Pure luxury and self-indulgence at these supreme levels re things only you and I fully comprehend - let me show 'us:'

Yesterday, arriving somewhat late to 'the party' to do with it, I opened a small glass jar of Blend 17. I got it at a deep discount of retail price '99 cents' from another multi multi millionaire friend-of-mine, Tony Galati, at his huge market in Wanneroo - 'the Spud Shed.' 

It's got this ultra premium dusky rose/white gold-and-black packaging around it, but the actual container itself is in all other respects the same as the normal glass jar of Vegemite.

Now in the first place, you have to be one of the tiny global minority of people who actually love this item - the usual way of imbibing it being on toast slathered with melting golden, real, full-salted butter.

What an amazing, unique luxury sensation! It's like molten... molten... molten... black liquid silk enriched with many mysterious strange vitamins, and ...salt.

He he he he he ha ha ha ha haaaaaargh! No one else will ever understand; 'except me and thee, and I'm not even certain about thee.'

La Plenitude

Here is some Australian music for you:

Well, actually, it is a collaborative effort between the lyricist and (American) singer, and the musical arranger and composer who goes by the commercial name of 'Elypsis' (happens to be a young Australian fellow).

Any American-Australian cultural link-up has the chance of some quite harmonic characteristics: both places are departures from the squandered British Empire, remnants of the types of people and personalities from that modern culture, mixed up with the very ancient and ineffable features of indigenous cultures (Aboriginal in one case, and American Indian in the other). I don't think the end results are 'all mixed up,' but rather they do find unique ways of blending the very old with the recent.

And of course, when we speak of British, we speak of Europe too; of 'Roman Civilization...'

'Plenitude' is the French expression used these days among the Champagne cognoscenti, to describe the three waves of 'fullness' in the aging of Champagne wine - I mean I would personally definitely use the same word for something like the mighty Penfolds Grange (a red wine), which also goes through these phases where the wine is said to be 'closed' and doesn't completely render its fullness of flavor potential.

'P2' - a second plenitude Dom Perignon (about 14 years old)

And I think we might do well to consider cultures such as the American, and the Australian, in a similar light to do with times and phases: we are, in my estimation, at the very beginning of a great Second Age of the post-British Empire 'modern' culture. 

On the one hand, living as an intellectual inside either of the American or the Australian culture is a highly isolated thing - there is a total lack of intelligence and thoughtfulness in both places, among the presumed 'leading edges' of society. There were early shoots in Australia during the time of Don Dunstan and Gough Whitlam and these were vigorously and quickly destroyed by both Left and Right sides of the political spectrum.

Where the 'destroyers' got things wrong - which they inevitably always do when it comes to these huge questions of great historic Epochs, really - is that they never themselves understood or fully grasped what the underlying economics of their cultures were all about. As indeed the modern Chinese will now also soon discover, that they too, are lacking in fundamental wisdom about economics.

And you can see this in recent idiotic remarks by people like Warren Buffet - who for years and years I told everyone I knew, was always but only living on the wisdom donated him by his early mentor, the great Benjamin Graham. Buffett recently called Bitcoins 'rat poison to the tenth power squared...' Or something like that.

In the modern world you have to specialize
in intellectual isolationism

This is just resentment speaking, it's not intelligence. And let me be the first person you ever heard say that Buffett is not now nor was he ever, quite the brilliant genius that everyone else makes him out to be...

The Bitcoin is unquestionably, at least it is in my mind anyway, because of its characteristic revolutionary, walk-away-from-tradition, very Australian vibe - the invention and creation, as indeed the current mythology is - of an Australian, some guy who called himself 'Satoshi' and who has disappeared off the planet. More or less.

The trouble with all those who want to decry digital cryptocurrency is that they fail to examine that it is functioning as money in the most ancient traditional way there is: namely, people use it in accordance with the obtaining technology of the day. And the obtaining technology is not paper, nor roads, nor buildings - it is electronics and iPhones and other similar gadgets.

Spears, boomerangs, woomeras - mollusk shell and paper-bark money. Buildings and vaults -  gold bricks and piles of paper.

iPhones and USB vaults - digital transaction tokens. Period. Bank it. It ain't happening any other way, sorry Warren. All money is rat poison, anyway; that's one of its standard definitions. Warren Buffett is an idiot. It's a waste of time listening to people like him - he's fixated about himself and about the past, which has moved by and gone now. Is he still rich? It simply doesn't matter. He will never be wealthy in tomorrow's world. He will be a constant loser, if he indeed even lives on for a few more years.