Yes, sure you can.
There are a number of 'trading' (on-line, computer screen type thingies) around the place. They all talk about 'warehousing,' and 'vaults' and audited accounts and all of this good stuff.
However I'll sell you the real physical thing (for delivery, and arrange delivery through courier) right through here:
https://interqward1.wixsite.com/sponsorsresources
And if you find you are unable to get into that site (for whatever reason), just message me here and we'll take it from there.
I only deal in Perth Mint Gold as a general rule (bullion bars, maybe some coins upon inquiry) which means we are talking about the best ranked Mint bullion in the world.
Everything's negotiable because that's what my mentors always taught me so if you have specific requests you have to say so.
I have a source of cash-flow that supports the acquisition of a level of supplies of precious metals, namely, that I promote the sponsoring of various popular news channels on YT and other content providers via a crypto-currency - which means I basically can readily supply (taking your crypto-currencies in exchange) only what this source has already funded. Otherwise there might be delays to purchasing and delivery, but then I wouldn't expect you to pay beforehand either in that case, if you ordered.
Wednesday, 27 September 2017
Tuesday, 26 September 2017
Christmas Elves and The Blue Shift
So this person I know who dabbles in physics posed this question: 'how long would it take you, if you were travelling at the speed of light, to go 10,000 light years?'
Gee I don't know!
Anyway, he says it would take you no time at all but that everything would go flat for you (go into two dimensions) and that you would go through the blue shift where everything would look blue to you.
Well now I am just plain not absorbed by any of this anymore, where I once was during my teen years - now I'd be inclined to ask damn-fool questions like, 'would you even have eyes at that stage?'
 |
| Red and gold shift? - lol |
...So back to our metaphor about elves, and maybe this parable concerning them at Christmas time.
Elves, as every schoolboy should know, travel very fast as a general rule - they need to slow themselves down to even by seen by humans in the human realm. Christmas elves appear dressed in red. The red shift in theoretical physical is the opposite of the blue shift.
Now here's the problem, as I see it, with the standard proposition that is all over the place these days about 'the law of attraction:' firstly, the thing is made to appear to operate without any dynamic intelligence that governs what people 'get' via this 'law of attraction.' And sure it's good that each individual gets the power of agency and uses their own sense of responsibility to 'attract' whatever they are seeking - but you cannot tell me that most people are possessed of even basic common sense when it comes to what they desire...
Property investors become absorbed by the dream and the fantasy that this market is, leveraged stock gamblers become entranced by the appearance of having the power of more money than they really do have, and alcoholics and drug addicts are focused on their bio-chemical need. None of these people can 'write letters to the Santa Claus of the Universe of the Law of Attraction' and be considered by such a thing without reference to their unbalanced emotional and psychological condition.
 |
| This is not an object - this is a dream come true Stephane Jimenez bespoke shoe |
Thursday, 21 September 2017
I Could Not Have Been More Explicit
I suppose the worst part of the modern culture mythology of 'the Illuminati' is - they are not it...
...Now I want to take you to a place where 'it' really is.
The ancient Greek writer Plato said 'there, it is the case that the people are holy, and their temples are based on real things, and in them the gods really are, and walk among the people actually.'
We could resort to the Vedanta and extract the same ideas from there - but that body of work is very large and very complicated to unravel into the English language. At heart though, remains the proposition that sound is the pathway through which or from which, material action that is directed by human thought, is initiated. This idea is also to be found in Shamanic cultures - the Australian Aboriginal, the Mongolian Shamans, the Saami People of the Arctic Circle, well, really, all of them.
Part of the problem that people have believing either in Eastern mysticism or Western occultism or even religious philosophy as scientific fact, is that there is usually a gap of time between when a thought is constructed as some kind of intended basis of a material thing in reality, and anything that 'might' happen as the result, actually does happen.
Secondarily, material reality is HUGELY more complicated, more complex, than people consciously credit when they play around with these kinds of 'magical thinking' propositions.
Taking a troop of men to war using marching bands and drumming is a fairly narrowly-defined kind of thing - it is not complicated. Well, certainly not in the context of all other things it is not complicated anyway.
It is common knowledge among occultists or those who have made study of it, that things like say 'elves' for instance, are for the most part in a 'realm' where they move at much much greater speeds than we do in the human world. You can't see them.
...Now I want to take you to a place where 'it' really is.
The ancient Greek writer Plato said 'there, it is the case that the people are holy, and their temples are based on real things, and in them the gods really are, and walk among the people actually.'
We could resort to the Vedanta and extract the same ideas from there - but that body of work is very large and very complicated to unravel into the English language. At heart though, remains the proposition that sound is the pathway through which or from which, material action that is directed by human thought, is initiated. This idea is also to be found in Shamanic cultures - the Australian Aboriginal, the Mongolian Shamans, the Saami People of the Arctic Circle, well, really, all of them.
 |
| The super wealthy elites in Germany love - Max Raabe and his nostalgic 20's style orchestra |
Part of the problem that people have believing either in Eastern mysticism or Western occultism or even religious philosophy as scientific fact, is that there is usually a gap of time between when a thought is constructed as some kind of intended basis of a material thing in reality, and anything that 'might' happen as the result, actually does happen.
Secondarily, material reality is HUGELY more complicated, more complex, than people consciously credit when they play around with these kinds of 'magical thinking' propositions.
Taking a troop of men to war using marching bands and drumming is a fairly narrowly-defined kind of thing - it is not complicated. Well, certainly not in the context of all other things it is not complicated anyway.
It is common knowledge among occultists or those who have made study of it, that things like say 'elves' for instance, are for the most part in a 'realm' where they move at much much greater speeds than we do in the human world. You can't see them.
Wednesday, 13 September 2017
Feel The Heat
We have no less of an authority on practical human psychology especially when it comes to matters of business, economics, and decision patterns concerning money, than the great Charlie Munger - to go to, to tell us that 'cognition mimics sensation' when it comes to the human being.
Cognition mimics sensation.
...To know something, to understand something with the whole of your intellect and your mind, produces the same physiological responses (we hear this all the time these days with books like 'The Secret' and so on - but we're not on that page here) and reactions as when you actually physically apprehend the thing as a material real thing. And it works the other way, too. When you emotionally feel something, your subconscious body responses and reactions are the same as when you fully intellectually appreciate that certain given thing.
But we have seen in the immediate prior post, that there is a complete linguistics of emotions available in the field of music - via the musical modes: Ionian, Dorian, Phrygian, Mixolydian, Lydian, Aeolian, and Locrian.
Now as I said in the previous post here, I am not going to detail everything that there is to say about these things - especially not here, especially not on-line. However if you go off and explore on your own along the paths that seem to be suggested in this series, you will at minimum realize that it is most unwise to be unguarded about what you choose to receive every day as 'information;' it may not be 'information' but a highly organised regime designed to destabilize you from the ability to make internally ego-stable (in other words, in harmony with yourself), fully-conscious, decisions.
Musical modes are a language. They are a language with a basis of strict physics.
And a good musical technician and theoretician can 'look' at a number of musical works and say 'oh, this one is saying that thing, and that one is saying this other thing to us.'
Hans Zimmer is a master musical technician. So is John Barry.
A good semiotics technician can look at a large range of signals available within daily human society and say 'oh, this organisation is corrupt, and this person is a criminal, and this other person is a continuous source of material wealth.' There is so much pretension out there, often in the cloak of serious academic work and thinking and teaching, that on the whole, if you are an unguided person - a young person, or someone who has never had the benefit of an instructor who has genuinely mastered life - you will not be able to find what you need, in order to escape the maze, and to get into complete control.
Here's an example of what I mean: the study of what is now called 'construal theory' is a wonderful area of study. In short, the phrase means that the further in distance a thing is from a human observer, the more abstract become the ideas that that person will tend to hold about it.
So, if we take the case of someone thinking about a vacation away somewhere, when they just think about it, the holiday locations, the actual travel, the attraction of the whole thing -, all these things take on a very obscure or vague character. But when that person gets down to booking, and to arranging passports, going through the airport checkpoints, carrying the luggage and so on, an amazing array of details come into frontal conscious focus that were not there in that place before.
Now in almost every single text about 'construal theory' that you will be able to find on the internet, at some stage you will encounter the following statement - 'the abstract ideas mean they are less concrete...'
Well they are most certainly NOT!
Musical modes are abstract ideas, and the Locrian mode the most distant, and it above all, is the most destablizing - and not a single one of the modes does not have a real concrete effect on the musical frequencies of notes; the vibrations of strings, the plucking of chords, the sounding of metal bells, the pitch of audible air waves. It's all extremely concrete in physics. I mean there's a huge pointlessness to wanting to define 'concrete' as applied to the human and to his mind and his life, as merely that which is stuck and dried and dense!
Concrete (as in stone and clay stuff) functions to hold things up, to push things against other things, to conserve forces, to buttress falling forces, to be a barrier to certain movement but also to be a channel component to other movement. In other words it functions.
Good abstract ideas also function.
Bad abstract ideas are like bad ideas, period.
There is one particular abstract idea that exists about the basis for wealth, the platforms of wealth, the requirements that must be in place before intelligent wealth appears. We're not going to explain it in any detail here but we are fencing around it and leaving enough clues... I think there are too many people with wealth who acquired it accidentally to who they are, and the types of thoughts they have, and the kind of thinking they indulge in. And these are the ones largely, who for whatever reasons, are the most publicly seen of figures. There are many truly wealthy people whose names are utterly unknown to the world at large. And of those, some of them know exactly what they are doing.
I haven't convinced myself yet that I will keep this series posted permanently; I might I might not - I haven't decided. But for those very very very clever people here, some of the hints will become scary in their import. I'm just not going to spell it all out though. You're going to have to reach conclusions going from the limited explanations that I have given.
One thing I will tell you - this type of thing has a dark side, a downside for anyone who has a flawed ethical sense; it contains a chasm for anyone who is going about trying to cheat people or overpower them through 'sophistication' or 'cunning.' I'm not going to detail it though. People reading this series risk getting hurt - if they are the wrong kind of person. No matter how well-positioned they may have thought they were, there are elements about what has been said that can damage people because of idiopathic effects. And I've seen it happen even to psychopaths who think they are impervious to those undercurrents that normal humans respond to readily because of factors like empathy and similar things which I will not expand on here.
But what I have been talking about is extremely dangerous.
Here's a test - what do you feel about the following piece of live performance (only the first two minutes are the relevant parts):
Cognition mimics sensation.
...To know something, to understand something with the whole of your intellect and your mind, produces the same physiological responses (we hear this all the time these days with books like 'The Secret' and so on - but we're not on that page here) and reactions as when you actually physically apprehend the thing as a material real thing. And it works the other way, too. When you emotionally feel something, your subconscious body responses and reactions are the same as when you fully intellectually appreciate that certain given thing.
 |
| All these people who carry on about 'The Secret' and 'The Law of Attraction' do not understand what harmonic resonance is all about. This is a coffee machine by the way |
But we have seen in the immediate prior post, that there is a complete linguistics of emotions available in the field of music - via the musical modes: Ionian, Dorian, Phrygian, Mixolydian, Lydian, Aeolian, and Locrian.
Now as I said in the previous post here, I am not going to detail everything that there is to say about these things - especially not here, especially not on-line. However if you go off and explore on your own along the paths that seem to be suggested in this series, you will at minimum realize that it is most unwise to be unguarded about what you choose to receive every day as 'information;' it may not be 'information' but a highly organised regime designed to destabilize you from the ability to make internally ego-stable (in other words, in harmony with yourself), fully-conscious, decisions.
Musical modes are a language. They are a language with a basis of strict physics.
And a good musical technician and theoretician can 'look' at a number of musical works and say 'oh, this one is saying that thing, and that one is saying this other thing to us.'
Hans Zimmer is a master musical technician. So is John Barry.
A good semiotics technician can look at a large range of signals available within daily human society and say 'oh, this organisation is corrupt, and this person is a criminal, and this other person is a continuous source of material wealth.' There is so much pretension out there, often in the cloak of serious academic work and thinking and teaching, that on the whole, if you are an unguided person - a young person, or someone who has never had the benefit of an instructor who has genuinely mastered life - you will not be able to find what you need, in order to escape the maze, and to get into complete control.
Here's an example of what I mean: the study of what is now called 'construal theory' is a wonderful area of study. In short, the phrase means that the further in distance a thing is from a human observer, the more abstract become the ideas that that person will tend to hold about it.
So, if we take the case of someone thinking about a vacation away somewhere, when they just think about it, the holiday locations, the actual travel, the attraction of the whole thing -, all these things take on a very obscure or vague character. But when that person gets down to booking, and to arranging passports, going through the airport checkpoints, carrying the luggage and so on, an amazing array of details come into frontal conscious focus that were not there in that place before.
 |
| Acqua Di Parma - barber shop, in Milan. Are you really ready for wealth? |
Now in almost every single text about 'construal theory' that you will be able to find on the internet, at some stage you will encounter the following statement - 'the abstract ideas mean they are less concrete...'
Well they are most certainly NOT!
Musical modes are abstract ideas, and the Locrian mode the most distant, and it above all, is the most destablizing - and not a single one of the modes does not have a real concrete effect on the musical frequencies of notes; the vibrations of strings, the plucking of chords, the sounding of metal bells, the pitch of audible air waves. It's all extremely concrete in physics. I mean there's a huge pointlessness to wanting to define 'concrete' as applied to the human and to his mind and his life, as merely that which is stuck and dried and dense!
Concrete (as in stone and clay stuff) functions to hold things up, to push things against other things, to conserve forces, to buttress falling forces, to be a barrier to certain movement but also to be a channel component to other movement. In other words it functions.
Good abstract ideas also function.
Bad abstract ideas are like bad ideas, period.
There is one particular abstract idea that exists about the basis for wealth, the platforms of wealth, the requirements that must be in place before intelligent wealth appears. We're not going to explain it in any detail here but we are fencing around it and leaving enough clues... I think there are too many people with wealth who acquired it accidentally to who they are, and the types of thoughts they have, and the kind of thinking they indulge in. And these are the ones largely, who for whatever reasons, are the most publicly seen of figures. There are many truly wealthy people whose names are utterly unknown to the world at large. And of those, some of them know exactly what they are doing.
I haven't convinced myself yet that I will keep this series posted permanently; I might I might not - I haven't decided. But for those very very very clever people here, some of the hints will become scary in their import. I'm just not going to spell it all out though. You're going to have to reach conclusions going from the limited explanations that I have given.
One thing I will tell you - this type of thing has a dark side, a downside for anyone who has a flawed ethical sense; it contains a chasm for anyone who is going about trying to cheat people or overpower them through 'sophistication' or 'cunning.' I'm not going to detail it though. People reading this series risk getting hurt - if they are the wrong kind of person. No matter how well-positioned they may have thought they were, there are elements about what has been said that can damage people because of idiopathic effects. And I've seen it happen even to psychopaths who think they are impervious to those undercurrents that normal humans respond to readily because of factors like empathy and similar things which I will not expand on here.
But what I have been talking about is extremely dangerous.
Here's a test - what do you feel about the following piece of live performance (only the first two minutes are the relevant parts):
Thursday, 7 September 2017
This Series May Not Stay Up Long...
When I started to think about and plan this series (the first post being this one right now), I thought about posting something very explicit and leaving it up only for a short while, then take it down again (remove it) completely.
The reason for this might become clear presently.
I don't want absolutely everyone in the whole world to know about or even care about or spend time thinking about what is about to be discussed here...
The ideas you will see next are not commonplace and you may not have seen anything like them before - certainly not in the type of context as you will see them used here.
 |
| A nice little modern cabin space environment - could be anywhere, a boat, a plane... |
It is a well-enough known idea that Pythagoras observed the use of something we call the Phrygian mode (of musical notes) combined with heavy rhythms as a way to induce soldiers to become very violent and aggressive as they went into battle. And it is certainly no secret that music is regarded as emotionally evocative.
Today, there are a large number of psychiatrists who say that they are able to observe changes in brain-chemistry induced by energetically inductive 'forces' of musical patterns, and alterations in belief caused by the alterations in the brain chemistry so induced.
So for those of us here who come from the Wall Street Bear Forum, it might be that 'Viperbear' could be 'persuaded' not to be a hyper-Deflationist, or that 'Rasputin' could be induced into 'believing' that Bitcoin is absolutely in no way at all a Ponzi-type thing. (Guffaw).
That is to say, they might be 'tricked' by cunning forms of propaganda, rather than by the application of a strong logical argument. Now those two - and others not named - might tell us very validly, not to jump to conclusions about how strong or weak their minds are, or how the defensive systems they are armed with to make intelligent discrimination in these matters will easily swing into action.
 |
| Come with me up this stairway... I'm going to take you 'somewhere.' |
But what I want you to know is that those propositions are VASTLY moderate - mediocre - compared to what I'm going to tell you and show you: I'm going to make you wealthy instantly, by the application of some very advanced, you might even conclude, 'other-worldly' communication processes. And this will not be very different from the beating of drums a certain way and playing Phrygian mode music to get someone to become violent - in other words, it will be as completely effective; it will work most assuredly.
I will tell you beforehand why these things work. And they are not because of some vague 'Law of Attraction.'
We know that sound is frequency and power (energy). We know that musical notes are linear along a horizontal/vertical framework, and that each note itself has a sine wave profile.
What we do not generally think about, is that music - is a complete and scientific geometric architecture system that is as complex as any roadwork system in a modern city or planned urban topography, and that can be arranged to filter the flow of discrete data so that socially agreed items of material wealth align in their lubricity towards your pocket. Human music is nowhere near to being sophisticated enough to enable these things in any planned, reliable way. But I will now acquaint you with the term 'Schafli Symbols' and allow you to research these yourself.
 |
| The 'color' of wealth goes through phases of fashion, especially in terms of shades or color nuance |
Human society as things stand now, is not understood to be so advanced or sophisticated as that it possesses in any general sense, the linguistics of material 'money' and 'wealth' as a musical form.
Yet we accept very readily that the Locrian mode, for example, when used as film background music, makes us feel scared, or apprehensive, or gives us the feeling that something is 'out of place' or that we are out of place.
As far as you know there is no 'wealth mode' of musical scales and harmonies.
But I am going to show it to you.
Before I do though, I will prepare you with a few other things first. Understand that I have only access to sight stimuli, and sound stimuli via this technology we are using - and the other senses are just as complicated when it comes to organised, structured communication ways of using them.
Even so, we can get close to a desirable result.
Study this short video clip first, and then I will show you a Miles Davis piece you will much better be able to, if not deconstruct, at least apply...
Tuesday, 5 September 2017
No 'Rational Investor' In Existence
There is this idea in economics, about markets moving along various force lines - the equilibrium of Supply and Demand, and the so-called 'rational behavior' or rational choice scenario. The idea for 'rational economic agent' comes from William Stanley Jevons around 1859.
Rational behavior in a wide human social sense, rational choosing, large groups of rational people. These things simply do not exist in reality.
Which of course does not restrain economists from modelling using these concepts.
Moreover, these fundamental ideas have all been subjected to a lot of alteration over time as new factors came to be considered: 'Demand' once simply meant people's propensity to need something, or want something, and this later on became strictly dependent on how much money they had at their disposal; 'Demand' thence, came to be just the level of money available, whether debt or pure free cash.
We all know the insidious characteristic of this new version of a definition of economic Demand - namely, that it has become normal for governments to function as the enablers of debt, debt now having become officially equated with Demand because it implies 'money' in this new definition.
Human economic systems and their understanding may not be divorced from the psychology of human behavior.
And we need to be particular that we are speaking of obtaining human behavior and not of human behavior as it ideally might be.
Yes humans might be rational, but they are not. We can see people attempting to explain that nevertheless the causes and reasons why someone does a thing is rooted in their own perception about that thing - yet I disagree. Recently, there have been news stories about some celebrities who spent atrociously large sums of money on cocaine - in one case 30 million dollars over just six months. And so we are told this is because of addiction. And so addiction becomes the reason, and thus, 'a' rational cause.
But when we listen to what the person involved actually says, we find another thing: we see them say they no longer knew why they were doing what they were doing because cocaine posed no chemical attraction to them as it had earlier on. And I accept this. It is possible, in fact it is usual, for people to have no connection whatsoever in their minds between what they might find themselves doing, and any specific logical or rational reasons for doing it - these are automatic behaviors that they engage in.
One has to be very careful, as a thinking person, about words that become commonplace - and not assume we always know exactly their meaning as intended by those using them on us.
We are vended beliefs about words. And then all too readily adopt those vended meanings and base the actions of our lives upon such false meanings - with predictable results.
'Money' is conditional to how it is gained. 'Wealth' is conditional upon who else says it has been attained. 'Luxury' is marketed luxury. And marketing is successful or not, depending upon which celebrity with how large of a bank account, is addicted today, to whatever was being marketed a moment before... And then all the rest of the public follows along behind these examples of leadership and wealth truth.
You can't expect to 'see' ahead which companies' stocks will rise in the market, based on concepts about rational behavior that simply do not reflect what people do and especially, how they think, or that they think at all.
We are not all the same, who occupy this Earth, and who appear as intelligent living beings here.
And soon, we shall moving away in these posts and articles, from what will be considered standard discussion, to what I regard as having supreme importance and significance - and we shall see how this differs from what you are generally told about such things...
Rational behavior in a wide human social sense, rational choosing, large groups of rational people. These things simply do not exist in reality.
Which of course does not restrain economists from modelling using these concepts.
Moreover, these fundamental ideas have all been subjected to a lot of alteration over time as new factors came to be considered: 'Demand' once simply meant people's propensity to need something, or want something, and this later on became strictly dependent on how much money they had at their disposal; 'Demand' thence, came to be just the level of money available, whether debt or pure free cash.
We all know the insidious characteristic of this new version of a definition of economic Demand - namely, that it has become normal for governments to function as the enablers of debt, debt now having become officially equated with Demand because it implies 'money' in this new definition.
Human economic systems and their understanding may not be divorced from the psychology of human behavior.
And we need to be particular that we are speaking of obtaining human behavior and not of human behavior as it ideally might be.
Yes humans might be rational, but they are not. We can see people attempting to explain that nevertheless the causes and reasons why someone does a thing is rooted in their own perception about that thing - yet I disagree. Recently, there have been news stories about some celebrities who spent atrociously large sums of money on cocaine - in one case 30 million dollars over just six months. And so we are told this is because of addiction. And so addiction becomes the reason, and thus, 'a' rational cause.
But when we listen to what the person involved actually says, we find another thing: we see them say they no longer knew why they were doing what they were doing because cocaine posed no chemical attraction to them as it had earlier on. And I accept this. It is possible, in fact it is usual, for people to have no connection whatsoever in their minds between what they might find themselves doing, and any specific logical or rational reasons for doing it - these are automatic behaviors that they engage in.
 |
| "Life's Rich Tapestry" |
One has to be very careful, as a thinking person, about words that become commonplace - and not assume we always know exactly their meaning as intended by those using them on us.
We are vended beliefs about words. And then all too readily adopt those vended meanings and base the actions of our lives upon such false meanings - with predictable results.
'Money' is conditional to how it is gained. 'Wealth' is conditional upon who else says it has been attained. 'Luxury' is marketed luxury. And marketing is successful or not, depending upon which celebrity with how large of a bank account, is addicted today, to whatever was being marketed a moment before... And then all the rest of the public follows along behind these examples of leadership and wealth truth.
You can't expect to 'see' ahead which companies' stocks will rise in the market, based on concepts about rational behavior that simply do not reflect what people do and especially, how they think, or that they think at all.
We are not all the same, who occupy this Earth, and who appear as intelligent living beings here.
And soon, we shall moving away in these posts and articles, from what will be considered standard discussion, to what I regard as having supreme importance and significance - and we shall see how this differs from what you are generally told about such things...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)