For no reason whatsoever, I shall be talking a little about old gentlemen's clubs - well they will need to be 'old' because I am trying to refer to things which no longer exist anywhere except perhaps in my front rooms...!
I regularly take a look at magazines and internet magazines about the so-called 'world of the luxury consuming and wealth-possessing elite' - and all I get is a bunch of stuff about Singapore, or brand-name restaurants and hotels in New York well and truly past their prime. The Singapore stuff is, albeit definitely full of cash and property-rich people, just a parody of 'ideas' from the olden days about what constitutes the 'luxury lifestyle.'
It's at a men's club somewhere,
I don't know where
Do men's clubs have women members? Well yes, they do and may do, except the women ought to dress properly - which in fact means they can wear tuxedos and pants. Not many people know that women are permitted to wear tuxedos to formal or semi-formal affairs and it does not or need not imply they are lesbian.
Some of -, no no all of the world's best bespoke men's suite-makers make trouser-ed attire for women clientele.
Even the Milanese men's fashion platform - Pitti Uomo - has examples of clothing for women that consists of ostensibly, or otherwise, male fashion styles.
And what has this got to do with anything? Nothing at all. It's just that I feel it is another one of those things which appears to be going along with my recent theme about popular expectations and perceptions of 'truth' and 'reality.' Many people might think I'm wrong about the above stuff. And they won't be the people within the social circles in which there are these kinds of things worn:
You have to realize, that is, if you have a truly independent and intellectual mind - that today's highly criss-crossed world of 'information' and 'thoughts' contains the danger of mass-scale error and fatal mistakes taken into some form of action.
But by 'truly independent' I mean able to think away from the apparent consensus and the common cant.
When a popular entertainment - say like a movie - appears and takes a firm hold of people's beliefs and outlook, then it becomes next to impossible to shake the 'truth' that the common man thinks he now 'has' on account of this latest 'thing' which gave him his newest latest unshakable confidence...
The assumption that is all too easily made these days - and you hear it in many quarters - is that information is everywhere and widely available and easily accessible and virtually everything (factually knowable) is 'out in the open' if you search enough.
Here is a very short list of things that everyone is convinced are 'facts:'
There are no independent records of the existence of Jesus Christ
There are no actual 'originals' of the Gospels
Most Western religions are based on pagan season traditions, and astrology
Zeitgeist, the movie, is a relatively modern, new, work
Atheism means not having a belief in god, or not believing there is a god, or is a scientific, practical perspective that uses proof and evidence to come to a 'knowledge.'
Christmas as it is practiced now, is based on a pagan festival
the young boy who died with his face downwards in the sand, was fleeing to Europe
However none of these things are true.
The word that people ought to be using when they say 'atheist' is 'opo-theist.' Which is also, not the same as 'apotheos!'
What people mean is that they are OPPOSED to religion and to 'god' or the need for a god.
'A-theist' is similar in construction to a word such as 'a-moral...' If you see what I mean.
To be an atheist is a political thing these days, and so what people should say is that they are 'opotheist.' In other words, politically opposed to religion and to god. Not that they 'don't know whether there is a god,' or that they have proven that there isn't one. That would be: 'agnostic,' and 'protonihignotheist.'
The young boy who died on the beach was turned away by Talal Al Waleed from seeking refuge in Saudi Arabia and received no money or support from Al Waleed - but Al Waleed spent several billion dollars taking large stakes in the media companies who took the picture and spread it around, and, he spends billions of dollars establishing foundations and research grants at Harvard and other Universities where people like Reza Azlan get their degrees. I don't care whether there is or isn't proof of the existence of 'Jesus.' I don't like Reza Azlan trying to tell me.
If you see what I mean.
I will say this: never one single time, have I ever floated a story, or canvassed one, here, without facts and proof to back everything I said up. Not one single time. Ever.
The photographs in this post were taken this year without any enlargement lenses or any kind of modification inside or outside of the camera, of what was visible to the ordinary human eye at the time.
Supermoon - evening in New York
But if you go to the Wikipedia entries about the apparent size of the Moon to human vision, you will wade through long passages of turgid pseudo-science and jargon that basically contradict what people's actual experiences are. Namely, that they do not in fact (according to Wikipedia) 'see' the Moon as being larger at the horizon and smaller when higher in the sky, and that this is just an illusion inside their heads (rather than actually an optical illusion in the sky) although of what exact nature no one is agreed upon 100%.
And as far as the Supermoon is concerned it is more or less the same thing - on the one hand the Moon is physically closer, but that doesn't alter the original human mind trickery that makes it only seem as if it is visually - that is, optically - incredibly large at the horizon.
San Fancisco, 2016
Good luck to you if believe that.
The wonder of today's world is that no sooner had the human race harnessed the power of computers and computer memory, than they altogether gave up thinking through anything, being able to rely on mechanical iterations and re-iterations of processes and 'things' they need or consume without having to really be so concerned that they actually knew how these things happened...
So then we also have Chris Anderson, the founder of TED Talks, who claims to be a Christian or something akin at least, and to appear on the surface, to be racially or ethnically English, and to own and run this 'not-for-profit'/'NONPARTISAN' organisation that promotes interesting, usually academic, talks. He calls them 'powerful' rather than my word - 'interesting.'
Indians - a lot of them - call him a Bangla, though. And what they mean is laden with political import not readily understood by outsiders. When Bengal was ceded by the declining British Empire, part of it became part of India (West Bengal) and another part of it became what is now called Bangladesh, and another part of it went to Pakistan.
And she's not Chinese, either! But she is a spy,
at least in a Bond flick anyway
Under the processes of 'partition' people who could establish they owned land in Bengal, and were moving to the new Islamic nation of Pakistan, would receive money and land both from the British and in Pakistan itself from the new government of Pakistan. The way they 'established' they had previously owned land in Bengal was the exact same way Barack Obama established that he was born a US citizen: they went basically to expert Indian forgers who forged amazing documents 'proving' whatever it was they could afford to 'prove.'
Chris Anderson in my view is more or less the same thing as a Janissary - he is a Muslim who was 'captured' by means of money or force originally as a white person and a Christian, and then converted to engage in Fifth-Column activities and spying and sabotage in the West.
You don't need to believe me though. But if you go and trust TED Talks or Chris Anderson and wonder why you had ended up with a knife in your back (figuratively, of course...!) then on your own head be it, which it probably will be.
I have before me at the present moment, a glass of Wolf Blass Red Label Chardonnay Pinot Noir. When you look to buying wines, just don't waste your time consulting these commercial reviews - they are sheer utter rubbish. On the whole, what they do is go by the price and tell you in purple prose why expensive wines are great and then in two-dollar words why less expensive wines are not.
Don't let anyone tell you otherwise - this is
essentially white Burgundy, the greatest wine in the world.
It's frankly, mostly all rubbish. The big, well-founded manufacturers have tried-and-tested systems and unless something goes wrong with natural conditions in a given year, there is a consistency to what they do that is completely reliable. Of course if big-headed and otherwise idiotic Texan investment banks get their hands on the wine companies, then for a short while things are liable to go off the rails until they lose their money and piss off taking their brain-dead 'money-saving' ideas with them. As with everything there are the odd few exceptions where large owners do the right thing by the wineries. If you consult a common popular wine reviewer on the Wolf Blass Red Label Chardonnay Pinot Noir it says: 'tank fermented; a pleasant sparkling wine with good balance and length; not complex of course.' Idiots. There are others around though who speak with a touch more grace as they slowly cotton on to what this wine is. Often, large manufacturers get their hands on smaller supplies of exceptional grapes that they cannot utilize in their main labels because of volume or even style - and then they either produce a short run of 'unknown' labels or use their entry-level brands; and these wines are nevertheless outstanding. At ridiculously inexpensive prices. The Wolf Blass Red Label is supposedly one of these 'entry-level' brands.
As you know, Chardonnay Pinot Noir is THE white wine - it has been referred to as the 'crack cocaine of white wine...' My wife paid less than ten dollars for this bottle at a major retailer. The first words I would use to describe this wine would be: 'authentic and a wine of complete integrity.' Which is not something you can say about many huge name brands these days. There is nothing but grape here and the best fruit at that. How do you get 'long and balanced' without complexity - you can't. This thing is complex - it runs all the way in your mouth till the end of the glass and then you get the often mythical 'frankincense in the stained glass windowed church' hit that tells you you have been drinking the unicorn. The opening fruit notes are streamlined, seamless, subtle: mango, peach, definitely melon, some citrus. Soft, crisp, fresh, somewhat creamy. This is wa-a-a-a-y more than just long and balanced - this is LONG and SUPERBLY BALANCED! Frankly, it's as good as it gets with this style of wine. Gasp. Yep. It's that good. And why do I say that? Because there's nothing even slightly contrived about it; this is the real thing.
Joondalup Golf Course
I had a big week. I attended a two-day conference at the Joondalup Gold Course Resort (again!) and, again, experienced the best possible service and food and general environment. I observed, this time, that the rich people's cars were all silver or gunmetal grey... All the Ferraris, Mercedes, M-Series BMW's, even the 5 liter Mustangs - all grey or gunmetal. There were two green cars and one of them was mine. The golf course, as you know because I've mentioned it previously - was designed by the world's greatest golf course architect of all time, Robert Trent Jones Jr.
There he is, Robert Trent Jones Jr, on the right,
at last year's Ryder Cup
I have before me at the present moment, a glass of Wolf Blass Red Label Chardonnay Pinot Noir. When you look to buying wines, just don't waste your time consulting these commercial reviews - they are sheer utter rubbish. On the whole, what they do is go by the price and tell you in purple prose why expensive wines are great and then in two-dollar words why less expensive wines are not.
Don't let anyone tell you otherwise - this is
essentially white Burgundy, the greatest wine in the world.
It's frankly, mostly all rubbish. The big, well-founded manufacturers have tried-and- tested systems and unless something goes wrong with natural conditions in a given year, there is a consistency to what they do that is completely reliable. Of course if big-headed and otherwise idiotic Texan investment banks get their hands on the wine companies, then for a short while things are liable to go off the rails until they lose their money and piss off taking their brain-dead 'money-saving' ideas with them. As with everything there are the odd few exceptions where large owners did the right thing by the wineries. If you consult a common popular wine reviewer on the Wolf Blass Red Label Chardonnay Pinot Noir it says: 'tank fermented; a pleasant sparkling wine with good balance and length; not complex of course.' Idiots. There are others speaking with a touch more grace as they slowly cotton on to what this wine is. Often, large manufacturers get their hands on smaller supplies of exceptional grapes that they cannot utilize in their main labels because of volume or even style - and then they either produce a short run of 'unknown' labels or use their entry-level brands; and these wines are nevertheless outstanding. At ridiculously inexpensive prices. The Wolf Blass Red Label is supposedly one of these 'entry-level' brands.
As you know, Chardonnay Pinot Noir is THE white wine - it has been referred to as the 'crack cocaine of white wine...' My wife paid less than ten dollars for this bottle at a major retailer. The first words I would use to describe this wine would be: 'authentic and a wine of complete integrity.' Which is not something you can say about many huge name brands these days. There is nothing but grape here and the best fruit at that. How do you get 'long and balanced' without complexity - you can't. This thing is complex - it runs all the way in your mouth till the end of the glass and then you get the often mythical 'frankincense in the stained glass windowed church' hit that tells you you have been drinking the unicorn. The opening fruit notes are streamlined, seamless, subtle: mango, peach, definitely melon, some citrus. Soft, crisp, fresh, somewhat creamy. This is wa-a-a-a-y more than just long and balanced - this is LONG and SUPERBLY BALANCED! Frankly, it's as good as it gets with this style of wine. Gasp. Yep. It's that good. And why do I say that? Because there's nothing even slightly contrived about it; this is the real thing.
Joondalup Golf Course
I had a big week. I attended a two-day conference at the Joondalup Gold Course Resort (again!) and, again, experienced the best possible service and food and general environment. I observed, this time, that the rich people's cars were all silver or gunmetal grey... All the Ferraris, Mercedes, M-Series BMW's, even the 5 liter Mustangs - all grey or gunmetal. There were two green cars and one of them was mine. The golf course, as you know because I've mentioned it previously - was designed by the world's greatest golf course architect of all time, Robert Trent Jones Jr.
There he is, Robert Trent Jones Jr, on the right,
at last year's Ryder Cup
I assume that most of you will not be fans of the huge swathes of New Age-y video clips all over YouTube these days that go into ideas about 'attracting wealth' and holding mind-sets that 'harmonize' with the millionaire or even billionaire mind-set (whatever those are). Now ordinarily I have no view either way on these kinds of things. Wouldn't it be great though, if you could just 'think' in harmonic resonance (New Age-speak) with money and wealth and power, and all of a sudden it all comes to you like magic, following some 'attractive force...' And that's what the proposition generally is, with these kinds of videos and programs and books. But you know, the side banks of a river don't ordinary come together just because they are in simple harmony... There is a huge expanse of water flowing right in the middle there between the two of them, and it's called 'the river!' You need a bridge to be able to have the two sides 'meet' in a sense, although they won't physically actually meet unless Moses steps in and dries up the waters again. And then it becomes a miracle or a miraculous event or at least so rare as to be certainly not something you can 'expect' to happen, or rely on ever, just 'happening.'
A quantum bridge...
Even if you have a real (ordinary) physical bridge,
across a real physical river, and you send vibrations through
it - sometimes, you can crack the bridge!
In the physical realm, when two strings of different, separate, musical instruments vibrate in harmonic resonance, they do so because of the medium of air, which can carry the sound vibrations. The air, in this case, becomes 'the bridge' across which the vibrations can travel. So what makes it so different in the 'spiritual' world? Why don't geometry and physics rules still apply? Well but I think they do. And if people expect something other than that then they will end up pretty soon being disappointed by or disillusioned by these 'New Age-y' ideas and claims and assertions about harmonic resonance and 'the Law of Attraction.' I think it might be possible to have this 'law of attraction' thing be a kind of a reality... It might be possible to have 'harmonic frequencies' have an effect on what ideas one holds in one's mind, and it might from thence be possible to have a mind en-trained in certain ways - but whether one can actually magically create outcomes with seemingly no physical cause/effect structure going on, well that is really asking something there! One would need to be an architect of the spiritual world, or an engineer of the spiritual world, to be able to attain such substantial results.
Midival Punditz - 'Khayaal'
In today's world, there are avid proponents of these New Age ideas, and there are strident critics who are very aggressive in their opposing viewpoints. I find both sides often equally lazy.
I assume that most of you will not be fans of the huge swathes of New Age-y video clips all over YouTube these days that go into ideas about 'attracting wealth' and holding mind-sets that 'harmonize' with the millionaire or even billionaire mind-set (whatever those are). Now ordinarily I have no view either way on these kinds of things. Wouldn't it be great though, if you could just 'think' in harmonic resonance (New Age-speak) with money and wealth and power, and all of a sudden it all comes to you like magic, following some 'attractive force...' And that's what the proposition generally is, with these kinds of videos and programs and books. But you know, the side banks of a river don't ordinary come together just because they are in simple harmony... There is a huge expanse of water flowing right in the middle there between the two of them, and it's called 'the river!' You need a bridge to be able to have the two sides 'meet' in a sense, although they won't physically actually meet unless Moses steps in and dries up the waters again. And then it becomes a miracle or a miraculous event or at least so rare as to be certainly not something you can 'expect' to happen, or rely on ever, just 'happening.'
A quantum bridge...
Even if you have a real (ordinary) physical bridge,
across a real physical river, and you send vibrations through
it - sometimes, you can crack the bridge!
In the physical realm, when two strings of different, separate, musical instruments vibrate in harmonic resonance, they do so because of the medium of air, which can carry the sound vibrations. The air, in this case, becomes 'the bridge' across which the vibrations can travel. So what makes it so different in the 'spiritual' world? Why don't geometry and physics rules still apply? Well but I think they do. And if people expect something other than that then they will end up pretty soon being disappointed by or disillusioned by these 'New Age-y' ideas and claims and assertions about harmonic resonance and 'the Law of Attraction.' I think it might be possible to have this 'law of attraction' thing be a kind of a reality... It might be possible to have 'harmonic frequencies' have an effect on what ideas one holds in one's mind, and it might from thence be possible to have a mind en-trained in certain ways - but whether one can actually magically create outcomes with seemingly no physical cause/effect structure going on, well that is really asking something there! One would need to be an architect of the spiritual world, or an engineer of the spiritual world, to be able to attain such substantial results.
Midival Punditz - 'Khalyaal'
In today's world, there are avid proponents of these New Age ideas, and there are strident critics who are very aggressive in their opposing viewpoints. I find both sides often equally lazy.
So, these are some of the names you have heard from me over the last few years, in this Blog and on the Wall Street Bear Chat Board:
Robert Spencer
Robert Spencer - is NOT a Jew, he's
a Melkite Christian
Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn
General Stanley A. McChrystal
...and I have in recent times, I hope you will have noticed, studiously avoided making any mention of Lola Astanova and her association with cancer charities that US President-elect Mr. Donald J. Trump has also been associated with.
I think I may have also mentioned Kevin Roberts, now ex-Saatchi and Saatchi. I probably have mentioned Steve Bannon somewhere along the way too.
It's entirely unintended of me to link these people (and there are others I haven't specifically named) all together as if they are some kind of organized movement.
Anyway, for me at least, it is interesting to note that Wikipedia is not entirely let's say, complimentary about Robert Spencer - the first person I mentioned above - and when I see Wikipedia repeating critiques of Spencer by Reza Azlan I really have to wonder how far we can go now thinking that Wikipedia is a reliable source or data and information resource. The Wikipedia is extremely short on detail about Spencer's life and past employment and maybe that has now turned into a good thing... And some of you will realize what I mean.
I realize too, that there are those around who have a view about the excessive power of the Zionista movement - and I myself have made mention of the presence of individuals around the world who have false names and are in fact part of a virtual criminal network that is comprised of London and New York theoretically 'Jewish' identities - and that many people think the Rothschild Network is some kind of hidden hand of dark influence everywhere; and it may be, to some extent.
But there are Rothschilds and there are other Rothschilds and they are different animals: Ondine Rothschild, who studied in New York and has a business currently in Sweden, is another person who has been a powerful supporter of the New York Philharmonic Orchestra, and of the Arts and of the Opera. And what she supports is characteristically different to the kinds of West Coast art that John Podesta goes to.
Baron Eric de Rothschild - he's NOT a bad guy at all!
And then of course Eric Rothschild of the French Wine Rothschilds - is a completely down-to-earth human being with little ambition to rule the world in quite the same way as those who funded the Zircon Spy Satellite (scandal) in the UK which led to the destruction of an independent BBC.
What I can tell you though, is that the people who make customized Range Rovers and Bentleys and Aston Martins and who bear Arabic-sounding surnames, and sell these to rich Middle Eastern people are not Jews. And they place listening devices and tracking devices inside these vehicles and they listen in on non-Sunni conversations...
But suddenly somehow, even with all of these 'control systems' in place, 'they' managed to still get it all wrong.
And so maybe I'd better leave things as 'unsaid' and not go too deeply into who Robert Spencer is and what he has done in the past. I think he's now an academic, isn't he?
We came so so close to a huge disaster.
What'll happen next?
The New York Philharmonic Orchestra will play at Donald Trump's inauguration, that's what'll happen next.
There won't be a 'Yalta Conference' and there is no Stalin in Russia, so maybe, we'll get to see some massive musical talents, both operatic as well as instrumental, and when they play 'In The Mood' I will be listening to hear if the first violinist hits the suspended fourth or the raised fifth in the third bar - just like Hedy Lamar organized a long time ago. You know, that classical musician and actress who invented this kind of cryptography and whose nephew became head of Agfa Bayer, and whose cousin was the sister of the head of covert space photography at Eastman Kodak, Bill Hutchinson - you know, Barbara Hutchinson, the first wife of Elie Rothschild I think it was.
Maybe we could hear Putin sing 'I found my threeee-il, ahn bleeeew-beer-y heee-il...'
It's a lot better than the 'pfsst' of the heroin syringes, in the arm of the Prince who still keeps a headsman for swinging his sword against some non-complying Asian maid, while his funded 'academics' like Reza Azlan gets to mouth off on CNN about what Islam is all about.
It is unfortunately, and quite literally the case, that not a month ago, fourteen young children were strung up by the ankles and had their throats cut on camera by ISIS - none of which video was ever shown by CNN to the human rights-loving 'protesting kids' in the streets of America yesterday night. And I still have people tell me I'm wrong that Huma Abedin, the Saudi, had the second Hillary email server and she was in fact, the 'Secretary of State' while Obama, the other Saudi pretend Chicago-an, was President, and Larry Tisch also the Chicago-an had gone to Dubai permanently the year before 9/11 and 'sold' the Twin Towers to Frank Lowy -, and Dick Cheney, whom everyone thinks is this tough Jewish-America Right Wing nut-job, worked for the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia ALL ALONG FOR MONEY. Period.
It was, oh so close of a call... You will never know. Because you prolly don't really believe me even now.
Okay we've all heard about the 'gigantic structure' or 'object' moving through a specific directional trajectory near Jupiter not related to local gravity forces (and therefore theorized to be under sentient 'control' of some kind).
The pictures released by NASA don't show anything clearly obvious to me other than some brighter patch of 'stuff.' It is large but it doesn't look like 'a structure' to my eye.
And yes it all does possibly tie into ancient scriptural prophecies that are meant to be fulfilled around about, oh, sometime shortly after there are 'floods and earthquakes and disasters and wars and rumours of wars...'
I want to remind you, however, of the actual meaning of the word 'asteroid' (it means 'star-like' rather than a junk of space rock) and also of the probability that the original text Aramaic word 'absinthian' (rather than, as it is now conveyed 'wormwood,') would have had a distinct meaning known to the culture at the time in whose language these words were being written down.
Yule Time - The Solstice is material darkness; the absence
of light from the material Universe. What comes from
beyond that point lies outside of the Universe.
As we are approaching the soon-enough-to-be deepest darkest part of the Winter - the Solstice - I want to tell you that the common dictionary explanation about the word 'Yule' is also wrong, or at least very superficial and thus to a large extent misleading. 'Yule' is NOT a German word; it is another word that first appears in Syro-Aramaic, yet it itself comes from much much earlier times. It means 'the deepest extent of the dark.' 'Yalda' or 'Yalta.' I guess we should have known what would come of the Yalta Conference!
Now 'darkness' as you know, has no separate existence of itself; it is merely the absence of light.
Even the word just used, 'absence,' contains elements that are pertinent to what I'm about to say. 'A' is a prefix that in Syro-Aramaic implies 'not' something...
'Po' or even 'pos' or 'poth' means a seer or a knower or something seen; the adviser of the Pharaoh was a 'Pothir.' The ending 'inthian' is massively ancient and is a borrow ending into Syro-Aramaic and was uptaken into ancient and modern Greek: 'Corinthian' - which really doesn't mean someone from Corinth but rather, someone from those who sing and dance and party. And only because the place became associated with such pleasures was it ever conferred to it, the name 'Corinth.'
'A-pos-inthian' means something never before seen at all by anyone.
So it could be that there is a legitimate prophecy about the place, of 'aliens' appearing, but then again, knowing as I do, some of the characters involved in NASA - notably Jack Parsons and the Northrup family - and we should not discount the Busch Family either, there is also every possibility of someone concocting 'an event' that looks like an alien incursion which then causes all kinds of destabilizing effects down here on this mundane little planet of ours.
Impossibly pure 'design' in its first example - the Countach.
But you will be able to tell whether anything that happens - if, that is, anything happens at all(!) - is really 'alien' in origin or only a man-made concoction.
Just look at Hollywood - since when was the last time you ever saw a futuristic sc-fi flick that showed you anything that wasn't obviously a man-made invention, once you turned things over in your mind just a little?
Design is an important part of our modern lives. And there really are very few designers engaged by industry or at the widely commercial level. Design intelligence is a totally rare commodity. Alas though, I think I almost make a mistake there in saying it is a commodity - I don't think it is a commodity; that is just a turn of phrase we all use, too casually in this case, I fear.
No, let me suggest to you that maybe something will happen - in fact TWO things will happen: one, a concocted event or incident, and the second, a real one.
The real one will be like nothing that has ever been seen before.
Okay we've all heard about the 'gigantic structure' or 'object' moving through a specific directional trajectory near Jupiter not related to local gravity forces (and therefore theorized to be under sentient 'control' of some kind).
The pictures released by NASA don't show anything clearly obvious to me other than some brighter patch of 'stuff.' It is large but it doesn't look like 'a structure' to my eye.
And yes it all does possibly tie into ancient scriptural prophecies that are meant to be fulfilled around about, oh, sometime shortly after there are 'floods and earthquakes and disasters and wars and rumours of wars...'
I want remind you, however, of the actual meaning of the word 'asteroid' (it means 'star-like') and also of the probability that the original text Aramaic word 'absinthian' (rather than, as it is now conveyed 'wormwood,' would have had a distinct meaning known to the culture at the time in whose language these words were being written down.
Yule Time - The Solstice is material darkness; the absence
of light from the material Universe. What comes from
beyond that point lies outside of the Universe.
As we are approaching the soon-enough-to-be deepest darkest part of the Winter - the Solstice - I want to tell you that the common dictionary explanation about the word 'Yule' is also wrong, or at least very superficial and thus to a large extent misleading. 'Yule' is NOT a German word; it is another word that first appears in Syro-Aramaic, yet it itself comes from much much earlier times. It means 'the deepest extent of the dark.' 'Yalda' or 'Yalta.' I guess we should have know what would come of the Yalta Conference.
Now 'darkness' as you know, as no separate existence of itself; it is merely the absence of light.
Even the word just used 'absence' contains elements that are pertinent to what I'm about to say. 'A' is a prefix that in Syro-Aramaic implies 'not' something...
'Po' or even 'pos' or 'poth' means a seer or a knower or something seen; the adviser of the Pharaoh was a 'Pothir.' The ending 'inthian' is massively ancient and is a borrow ending into Syro-Aramaic and was uptaken into ancient and modern Greek: 'Corinthian' Which really doesn't mean someone from Corinth but rather, someone from those who sing and dance and party. And only because the place became associated with such pleasures was it ever conferred to it, the name 'Corinth.'
'A-pos-inthian' means something never before seen at all by anyone.
So it could be that there is a legitimate prophecy about the place, of 'aliens' appearing, but then again, knowing as I do, some of the characters involved in NASA - notably Jack Parsons and the Northrup family - and we should not discount the Busch Family either, there is also every possibility of someone concocting 'an event' that looks like an alien incursion which then causes all kinds of destabilizing effects down here on this mundane little planet of ours.
Impossibly pure 'design' in its first example - the Countach.
But you will be able to tell whether anything that happens - if, that is anything happens at all(!) - is really 'alien' in origin or only a man-made concoction.
Just look at Hollywood - since when was the last time you ever saw a futuristic sc-fi flick that showed you anything that wasn't obviously a man-made invention, once you turned things over in your mind just a little?
Design is an important part of our modern lives. And there really are very few designers engaged by industry or at the widely commercial level. Design intelligence is a totally rare commodity. Alas though, I think I almost make a mistake there in saying it is a commodity - I don't think it is a commodity; that is just a turn of phrase we all use, too casually in this case, I fear.
No let me suggest to you that maybe something will happen - in fact TWO things will happen: one, a concocted event or incident, and the second, a real one.
The real one will be like nothing that has ever been seen before.
Well I guess the interesting thing about the Wikileaks email stuff is that it basically confirms every single thing the 'conspiracy theorists' have been saying all along. It was not so much that there were a few 'wild theories' about the place, but there was a sustained and very firm belief voiced by a large number of people about the criminal corruption of the recent political 'holders' of the White House, and of a number of government agencies under them. It is difficult now to 'get around' the factual basis for these allegations. But I must tell you all is not (it never is, is it) exactly as simple as we might initially think.
Afternoon tea...?
Yes of course it is crystal clear now that there has been large-scale unethical behaviour and compromising of ethics in senior government officials and elsewhere 'highly placed.' None of the revelations of the last few weeks ought to have surprised you - you've seen them all before albeit in the guise of mere 'conspiracy theory.' The apparent 'fact' that an email - which is a written or at least printable document - provides 'evidence' has altered the media's discourse from mere conspiracy theory hinting, to direct and open challenges to various specific individuals over their precisely detailed errant behaviour. And so, it seems that 'evidence' has moved things up a notch from just 'conspiracy theory' talk all the time whenever these opaque and possibly sinister matters are forced into the media's lap. But I want to take things right up into the nose-bleed conspiracy nutjob stratas. I want to discuss the 'what if' aspect of the space alien references in the leaked emails. It's clear the media and even Wikileaks themselves have soft-peddled on some of the items, and the inwards emails to John Podesta are not exactly evidence - not those that we have seen so far - that the government really believes space aliens exist and come and visit us. What they show is that the government leadership group is open to extended talking about the matter; they give it some time when you would think they would have no time for it at all. However I am going to tell you something now that no one else has ever discussed openly or in the public.
A host of the heavenly stars
There are certain aspects of the - let's call it 'talk' or chatter - in high government circles, about external to this planet, alien intelligent life, which proceeds from ideas and especially 'phrases' and terminology, that is taken for granted by all the 'obsessed' (if you want to still say its a conspiracy theory) when it comes to UFOs, and also by just plain ordinary government and military officials too. For example, certain words we all think we know mean one thing - like 'asteroid' for one good instance of this - actually have more than one meaning. And, let's assume again, that there are space aliens, and that they have at some stage or that they sometimes still do, communicate with certain designated officials in government... As far as all of the 'conspiracy theories' go, space aliens are concerned about nuclear war, and in some other 'theories' they wish to dominate or exploit us. Sometimes we hear they give us technology we have to back-engineer in order to understand. But I can tell you of one subject of 'talk' about which you will probably be familiar - there certainly are military and NASA teams who concentrate on so-called NEO's that is, 'near to Earth objects' that might have some risk of hitting us and causing a lot of destruction. However I've got to tell you something about this that you will read or see or hear nowhere else: the word 'asteroid' does not actually mean what you think it means, that is, what we all commonly take for granted that it does mean.
'Asteroid' as a word has never formally been defined as a piece of rock or ice or other hard object that is floating around in space or on a path through space. The word actually means, in Greek: 'star-like.'
And what this means is this: if your were to read, let's say, in the Bible, that a star-like object will proceed from somewhere and land on the Earth creating 'disaster,' it might not mean an actual hard object... It more means 'star-like' as in those bright light bearers that descended over the shepherds out in the fields guarding their flocks by night. Star-like is a Greek phrase which means a being that is from the heavens and is very bright, or angelic. And so, if you were to come across a current conspiracy theory to the effect that an asteroid is to fall into the water near Puerto Rico this month or so, causing havoc to Florida and the vicinity of - this might not mean an actual physical hard object falling to Earth. In those ancient writings we now say this is sort of an augury thing being talked about, albeit admittedly the Greeks and Persians also regularly personified these virtually astrological 'signs' and 'forces' and talked about them in terms of there being some intelligent force behind them, like a divine spirit, or sometimes they said, 'a god.' Whichever way you choose to look at it though, I will guarantee you we are not talking about a hard physical piece of rock from space falling down into the atmosphere and crashing onto the Earth; which is what everyone thinks.
Well I guess the interesting thing about the Wikileaks email stuff is that it basically confirms every single thing the 'conspiracy theorists' have been saying all along. It was not so much that there were a few 'wild theories' about the place, but there was a sustained and very firm belief voiced by a large number of people about the criminal corruption of the recent political 'holders' of the White House, and of a number of government agencies under them. It is difficult now to 'get around' the factual basis for these allegations. But I must tell you all is not (it never is, is it) exactly as simple as we might initially think.
Afternoon tea...?
Yes of course it is crystal clear now that there has been large-scale unethical behaviour and compromising of ethics in senior government officials and elsewhere 'highly placed.' None of the revelations of the last few weeks ought to have surprised you - you've seen them all before albeit in the guise of mere 'conspiracy theory.' The apparent 'fact' that an email - which is a written or at least printable document - provides 'evidence' has altered the media's discourse from mere conspiracy theory hinting, to direct and open challenges to various specific individuals over their precisely detailed errant behaviour. And so, it seems that 'evidence' has moved things up a notch from just 'conspiracy theory' talk all the time whenever these opaque and possibly sinister matters are forced into the media's lap. But I want to take things right up into the nose-bleed conspiracy nutjob stratas. I want to discuss the 'what if' aspect of the space alien references in the leaked emails. It's clear the media and even Wikileaks themselves have soft-peddled on some of the items, and the inwards emails to John Podesta are not exactly evidence - not those that we have seen so far - that the government really believes space aliens exist and come and visit us. What they show is that the government leadership group is open to extended talking about the matter; they give it some time when you would think they would have no time for it at all. However I am going to tell you something now that no one else has ever discussed openly or in the public.
A host of the heavenly stars
There are certain aspects of the - let's call it 'talk' or chatter - in high government circles, about external to this planet, alien intelligent life, which proceeds from ideas and especially 'phrases' and terminology, that is taken for granted by all the 'obsessed' (if you want to still say its a conspiracy theory) when it comes to UFOs, and also by just plain ordinary government and military officials too. For example, certain words we all think we know mean one thing - like 'asteroid' for one good instance of this - actually have more than one meaning. And, let's assume again, that there are space aliens, and that they have at some stage or that they sometimes still do, communicate with certain designated officials in government... As far as all of the 'conspiracy theories' go, space aliens are concerned about nuclear war, and in some other 'theories' they wish to dominate or exploit us. Sometimes we hear they give us technology we have to back-engineer in order to understand. But I can tell you of one subject of 'talk' about which you will probably be familiar - there certainly are military and NASA teams who concentrate of so-called NEO's that is, 'near to Earth objects' that might have some risk of hitting us and causing a lot of destruction. However I've got to tell you something about this that you will read or see or hear nowhere else: the word 'asteroid' does not actually mean what you think it means, that is, what we all commonly take for granted that it does mean.
'Asteroid' has never formally been defined as a piece of rock or ice or other hard object that is floating around in space or on a path through space. The word actually means, in Greek 'star-like.'
And what this means is this: if your were to read, let's say, in the Bible, that a star-like object will proceed from somewhere and land on the Earth creating 'disaster,' it might not mean an actual hard object... It more means 'star-like' as in those bright light bearers that descended over the shepherds out in the fields guarding their flocks by night. Star-like is a Greek phrase which means a being that is from the heavens and is very bright, or angelic. And so, if you were to come across a current conspiracy theory to the effect that an asteroid is to fall into the water near Puerto Rico this month or so, causing havoc to Florida and the vicinity of - this might not mean an actual physical hard object falling to Earth. In those ancient writings we now say this is sort of an augury thing being talked about, albeit admittedly the Greeks and Persians also regularly personified these virtually astrological 'signs' and 'forces' and talked about them in terms of there being some intelligent force behind them, like a divine spirit, or sometimes they said, 'a god.' Whichever way you choose to look at it though, I will guarantee you we are not talking about a hard physical piece of rock from space falling down into the atmosphere and crashing onto the Earth; which is what everyone thinks.
