Constitutional Reflectivity

We use 'cause and effect' to establish what we are calling 'logic' in our human mindsets.

Religions are reflections of the prevailing political situations. And that is all that they are.

The religious texts in tyrannies are characterized by threats versus propositions.

Let's go into the future now.

The religious texts of democracies are limitless: there is a 'constitution' around that will suit someone, but not one in particular that must suit all. There are never-ending constitutions, never-ending amounts of religious ideas and beliefs and it's all like a bazaar in which people can just wander around, picking and choosing whichever one suits them for that afternoon.

(I mean none of these things are sayings that are mine, at least not in this lifetime for sure! Other people wrote them a long time ago).

The religious texts of monarchies are high mythologies of the 'Golden Age' from which, out of the dim mists of antiquity, lineages proceed/have proceeded, and which are to be preserved.

Unfortunately, human beings, being what they are, well they adapt to bad situations so much so that at a point, it becomes impossible to prevent them from feeling emotionally displaced, and worried and troubled, when you 'free them' from some, let's say previous condition of enslavement.

To just look at possible narratives from the past about 'encounters' we need look no further than the story of the so-called 'Tower of Babel.'

Islam is not quite certain about exactly why Allah, in that case, decided to destroy the place and confound/confuse the people. Possibly 'Nimrod' (Arabic 'Namrud'/'Numrud') built this structure, possibly with the intent of 'climbing to Heaven to confront and even to overthrow God...'

Or possibly, either the tower was built so that two angels - Harut and Marut - could descend there, and from whence they then taught Mankind various 'magical arts:' which included cosmetics for women, chemistry and poisons, and how to make various weapons of war.

This narrative also exists in the Judaeo-Christian system, via the Book of Enoch certainly, though also in various places of the canonical Bible.

'Tower of Babel' bottle design by 
Serge Mansau.

We are left, however, with a significant contradictory set of narratives: either God destroyed Babylon and the Tower of Babel because Nimrod wanted to 'ascend to Heaven,' or because angels came down there and taught Mankind advanced forms of mischief.

Now frankly, let's assume you or I are actual 'God' in Heaven, and we are sitting there and someone on Earth decides to construct a very tall tower in order to 'get up to us...'

What we do? Logically, we would most certainly go: 'Okay, off you go then. Keep going. No problem.'

Doesn't make sense, right - that any real God would be even in the slightest bit concerned that anyone was going to get to Him any time soon by that means.

Meanwhile, later on in the Bible, this 'God' who meets and greets Moses -, has protruding nostrils ('apayim') on his face, breathes smoke and fire from out of them, spits burning coals down to Earth from out of his mouth, flies in smoke and clouds, lives on a mountain, possesses and hides a treasure, demands a percentage of virgins as 'his sacrificial share,' consumes heifers and goats and sheep and even people, gets angry a lot and destroys stuff.

??

And, even - he has a squadron of winged flying brass-like vipers that he liberally sends out to bite people, including his own 'followers/worshipers.'

This whole thing is not as simple (as many people want to think) as 'oh well, that's because God doesn't exist...'

No. What we can take from all of the accounts may be something along these lines: somebody built a very tall tower. We don't really know why.

Dome angel in Madrid, 
sculpted by Federico Coullaut-Valera.
It is called 'Winged Victory' (Victoria Alada)
and was completed on the 'Day of Athena'
which is 11 October. 

Something 'weird' happened but we really cannot say what, but something did.

And subsequent textual narratives reflect the politics - Jews are essentially enshrining a monarchical form of politics (KING David); Muhammadans are enshrining a Caliph-style tyrannical system (ONE ruler, reflection on Earth OF God, many many threats of extreme violence, plus propositions about what you will get in the future after you are dead, so long as you agree to become a slave).

And now we have Campbell's Tomato Soup Xtians all going along with the standard Jewish narrative - whereas this, is actually what their putative leader (Jesus) actually said about the Jews and their 'Moses:' "Moses gave you the Law, BUT..."

Huh?? But? But what?!

This is real God talking now, right - according to 'Christians' (so they want to claim they are, and from where they are deriving their form of the equivalent nonsense) - and He has just then whole-ly disavowed 'the Law of Moses!' 

Christians make it all the worse, when they insist on calling the individual concerned: 'Jesus' and 'Yeshua' (which is supposedly, the Hebrew form of it). Well, but that is not His name... Is it? This 'Christ' guy is an 'El' figure, not a 'Yeh' figure... (Isra-EL, EL-ijah, Dan-i-EL). So what's His actual birth name and why don't people use it?

The Quran (hopping over to there in my recent type of 'hopping and skipping' that has become all too noticeable, even to me!) - Allah says 'you must call someone and know them if you are to give respect acceptable to me BY THE NAME OF HIS FATHER.'

So - what Muslim can tell me what is this 'name of Muhammad's father' by which you are supposed to call him, to address him, and to refer to him?

Anyone? Anyone?

Dawn... (Refer music below)

...The point of all this, is for me to ask you to please consider, what would happen two minutes after some really good-looking hot ET Alien arrived on your doorstep, with a bottle of 'Big Red' telling you, that she (or he for that matter) was lost and needed to find the house of her (his) grandma's before evening - while batting their eyelids, all lengthened through their advanced arts of cosmetics.

You would annoy them no end, by having far far far too much difficulty, adjusting to a new reality, in which the morals (KP mentioned this) and the ethics and the 'rules' of what is understood to be a Universal Deity to truly advanced sentient beings - was nothing at all like what you (whether right now you care to admit it or not) had become so used to, that every five seconds around these people you would be questioning inside your mind (which they can easily read) whether something was 'right or wrong.' To say nothing of the fact that you would be assigning all kinds of consequences - that canon on through your emotional psychological being as 'perceptual realities.' 'I feel such-and-such.' That is a reality. It is known by psychology as 'perceptual reality.'

How much energy, do you think it is taking, on the part of advanced beings, to underwrite the nonsense going on in your head? 'Underwrite' meaning -, tolerate, and then spend time and energy on, un-doing. All the damn bloody time.

People who are moving fluidly through space-time, understand that 'cause and effect' in time-line frames of reference, is only a small part of logic and reality.

You want to have an advance intelligent being meet with you 'now' and so they can 'give' you some helpful things, maybe even 'hook up' (I believe, is what they say, the kids these days?).

How about you just keep your mind still, and observe...

Plenty of tall towers there!

But note, as you do, that the political situation of 'angels' (a la Harut & Marut) or of whoever is in touch/in tune, with actual Universal 'Deity,' is not tyrannical, certainly not democratic, not monarchical, and not technocratic. So what is it? And how will you 'get into it,' without dragging along all of the baggage of the human race that has built up inside of you, whether you like to acknowledge it all that readily or not, just yet.

'Republic' does NOT, mean, as the current definition maintains 'a type of system in which a state is ruled by representatives of the citizen body.'

It means equality between its members. You need to be equal. To meet any advanced ET Alien overtly, and for them to acknowledge who they are to you and to stay - you have to be their equal.

And you can do that. Yes you can. You can get there.

Understanding The Guardians

I watch a lot of arguments and discussion between people. When you're at Law School (which I was personally in, in the mainstream system though, only for a short while because I rapidly went into a government role that had its own 'in house' system of legal training...) at some point you will participate in 'moot court.' By standard definition this is a 'mock court at which law students argue imaginary cases for practice').

Depending on what your motivations are, you might always throughout the whole of your life, observe these situations - but you might do it with 'an edge,' so to speak, and not simply because you like watching politicians speak.

Supercar Blondie - not 'Barbie' although...
lol Can drive though. Damn yeah!

At a certain stage of your build-up of knowledge or what must pass for it in this world - you will observe that many good people, even those with very sound basic 'positions' on some crucial matter, will, when they are 'flying freely' in the subject, start to parrot off things that have been around for a long time, and that others have said as part of the 'dogma' if you will, of the 'position.' They are not really thinking about what they are saying.

When we are considering the peculiar subject of, say, ET Aliens being here, many people look back into the past and make suggestions a la 'Ancient Astronaut Theorists.' LOL

The fact is, it is wrong to say that anything we can see as 'artifact' from the past - at least in the form of any created object - was ever made by advanced ET Aliens.

Even the pyramids are clearly the work of human beings. There is nothing in respect of 'materials' or construction tools that evidence the advanced technology even of ourselves here today.

Sure it is advanced, and clever and industrious work, - but human, and human from a nascent time of Man's development albeit Mankind possessed great skills and intelligence.

So a great problem with human thought as we see it today, embodied in ideologies,

regardless even of whether they are scientific ones, and not simply religious or belief system ones - is that they are all heavily subject to open blind ignorance as soon as people feel free to speak gratuitously. Which is all the time. It is such a trap too, that in most cases it becomes impossible to explain to that person espousing the position, exactly how off-the-trail they really are. People get things right, and from there, they quickly throw in loads of rubbish that is completely. They never seem to be satisfied just 'sitting pat' on clear-cut truth at all. And staying there.

If you are not already capable of doing it on your own, certainly I could take you, over just a few weeks, stick you in a darkened room most of the time, and at the end, you won't have any difficulty at all knowing the difference between imaginary friends, or hallucinations - and actual encounters with actual people who are not at all from this planet!

There is a widespread modern pop cultural - although, it has more than just the dimension of being a teen thing and is supported by the older generation (on account of the strong Confucianism social environment there) - idea in Korea, that 'K-Pop' groups must not have boyfriends or girlfriends and only 'fans,' and that they cannot even marry anyone. If they do, they must leave the group.

Rabindranath Tagore - great poet of modern Korean
culture. Huh? Oh, but you knew, right?

The story is 'they have the pure morals/moral purity of angels...'

So - would it be possible to point out to Xtian ideologues, for instance, that in the standard New Testament text, 'angels' are really really sexed-up creatures??

No, you could not say that to anyone; no one would believe it. But it is there starring everyone right in the face and no one appears to 'get' the words they are reading.

Alternatively, the Quran makes a fuss of Jesus coming back to 'break crosses' because the competing ruling Abd' ul Malik wanted to envision the destruction of the Byzantines. He even caused Islamic eschatology to say that the rise of an apostate regime would stop at 'Rum.' He meant - Constantinople; which he wanted to take complete control of and which he believed would remain an ideological battleground into the future, even after he took it by force.

Why couldn't Jesus come back to um, I dunno - say, Lhasa and 'break Buddhas?' (At least that would have shown whoever wrote the Quran really did know the future and things that hadn't happened yet at the time of the first exposure of the Quran) Or how about Sri Lanka and break 'idols?' Because none of those places had any relevance to Abd' ul Malik!

...So.

Where does this leave us?

The big three religious/philosophical/morality systems in the world: pop Xtianity, Islam, and Vedic (which includes Buddhism) though possibly with some exceptions with the Vedas because they are so diverse and wide-apart morally in places - all have this concept of 'judgment' because you have or are 'breaking' someone else's law; it's not your personal internal individual law code -, it is from outside of you/outside of your life.

Suzanne Chesterton - 'trance singer'
lol... Is. Honest. Nothing more, nothing less.

And all of them force you to this notion that there is someone or something outside of you, that has so much greater power than you, that you must accept their/its enforcing, delivery downwards onto you, of its rules. And you have to fit into it, because you are essentially not 'it' inside.

However, there is an entirely different notion that is quite unfamiliar to most of the world, and it is around in places, one of those being the texts which speak of 'Guardians' that are subtly here and extremely powerful but whose aggression and aggressive is hidden because they don't even want to be known of as forceful and overpowering. They have no money, no wealth, no position, no social entitlement, but they are really, the actual gatekeepers to you. To what becomes of you.

And, they are hidden, in disguise, but actually present under your nose. All the time.

There's documents about them. People don't talk about those. If they have even encountered them, they think it's just a speculation. Virtually a pointless speculation. Taoism has some similar ideas. And even there, in that ethnic context, it is Confucianism that rules on the surface.

You see, it is utterly cruel to expose to everyone else, that you got out, and that they didn't and nor could they ever at this stage of their um 'development.' So there is a gulf between 'you' (if you 'get' the idea, the key - the golden key, which isn't 'gold' at all, of course), and the values that everyone else has, and what they all hold is important and valuable...

So...

This track is a ballad, not really the style that we have been posting recently, but it is from Sue McLaren and Suzanne Chesterton.

It's called, 'Guardian.' Interesting vid.

'Weird' Intellectual Stuff

So I'm characterizing this with the phrase 'Intellectual' but that's basically only because someone 'out in the field' still, mentioned that there was not enough intellectual conversation available where he was, in his stake-out. ...He's been managing to attract 'black Toyota Kluger' tails though, so, all is not in vain with his current sacrifice. ; ) Just hang in there.

This is about a guy I knew well a while back - I'm not going to mention his name here right now, in case 'Kluger men' put ten and five together and get zero. We can totally work even with the 'Wokey-Woke' new mini pasta soup people, but not with these lunatics in the 'black Toyota Klugers' down here. They are going to find out the meaning of 'long log fire in the Taiga winter' one day very soon. And heaven knows, they seem to know enough about 'wheelie bin fires' in lonely plantations.

Much more beautiful in RL than it looks
in the pics - and has a kick in the back that
I have only twice before ever felt from cars.

Anyway. Back to the business: for years and years I knew this fellow, I loved having lunches and dinners with him just to wait for the moment (it would always come) where his brain would go right off the rails. He was the absolute ultimate 'apparent' liar. Some of his stories were so ludicrous, that even I had difficulty working out exactly how mad he was, not if/whether he was crazy.

But who was he? He was an apprentice, literally a junior (which meant he already had massive talent) camera-operator, rigger, and photographic developer for the Sydney celebrity photographer and other crazy man - Helmut Newton.

Helmut Newton's work, of course, is only about the highest 'haute vie' glamour photographic art in modern times - all the high society women love it; and he knew all of them, rubbed elbows with all of them. Princess Caroline of Monaco, Sylvia Gobbel, Sigourney Weaver; you could go on for days. He was enormously commercially successful, did a ton of marketing - even Hugh Hefner loved him, and that was a stretch for Hugh because he was also an amazing photographer, but apparently, no professional jealousy there.

Now I'm going to 'work back round' the other way for a second. We know Helmut because our Chief of Station SEA, in Singapore gave him a job at the Straits Times, and then arranged a passport for him for Australia.

See, here's an example of the problem we have with the UK people. They had no understanding of the value of a German-Jew, escapee from the Nazis, with sophisticated German photography training. They were going to intern him - actually did that to begin with - until 'someone' busted him out, effectively, with a ticket and a pass to Australia. Got it?

So, Bill, although I haven't told anyone openly who 'black Kluger guys' are, me, you and all else here can pretty much entertain a fairly decent guess. They are not our guys, obviously, even though they claim to be. They are just stoopid guys.

Yeah, sure lady - I know, you're on a diet...
I am talking to YOU, JES.

Anyhew...

My olden days 'friend' used to go game fishing with Lee Marvin. Was very handy with a serrated back-edge long blade knife.

He just casually told me one time, that he could lay his hands on some 'stolen artwork' from the Nazis. And he told me because he figured I had 'some' money and many friends with lots of money. And that's what rich people do, right? They 'acquire' black market stolen art from the Nazis. Right? I don't. I used to think I didn't know anyone who did, but hell, you know; you live - you learn!

Me, I thought he was plain nuts. I would say to him: '*, you have a ton of money, why don't you buy it?' Answer: 'Oh my ex-wife, oh my divorce cost me, is costing me, oh whatever blah, blah, blah.'

So a few years ago, world art experts noticed that in one of Helmut Newton's photographs, there, right there, in the middle of it, with an accent light posed and even shining on it, was a stolen artwork - a well-known item of art that had been stolen by the Nazis, and previously thought 'lost.'

Interesting too but recently, I notice a photo original print of his just went for about $100,000 at a US auction. Actually most of his work goes for that kind of price.

Well don't have any chocolates then,
if you don't want to. I'm not forcing you!
Sir Robin of Locksley - Gin Truffles.

You see, here is where you can start to plumb, not actually fathom the depth of, but plumb at least - how deep and how smart, are the real top-line field operatives and agents. They can scan an image, and they will do every square inch and they will look at it ten different ways and you can bet your life they know what they're looking at - when all others think they are looking at an upscale, glamour-mag, and nonetheless erotic, art photograph.

The ordinary member of the public today believes all the Nazis are dead. Even US government discretionary employers have gone 'Wokey-Woke!' LOL No Nazis there!

Let's see, how am I going to maneuver this discussion even further back round, round - to the question of whether super-advanced intelligent beings care about us, and find us 'valuable' or 'worthwhile' at all...

Now here's a terrible thing, right: (and when you pose it to yourself in light of what I'm about to say, it really will be a terrible, confronting and a very serious, thing) do you find yourself worthwhile and valuable?

Why? Are you actually happy being who you are... ...physically? Would you like to alter something? Physically. Does your conscious brain energy go completely, into all the physical parts of your body and come back with the impression that, yeah, I'm good; this will do?

...Or do you want to go some more with the DNA iterations until 'you' get your 'feel' perfectly or acceptably right?

If you don't see yourself as valuable like that - why are you expecting any others to?

ET Aliens have the DNA from Julius Caesar. For sure they do.

...If you know how to use it.
The BMW is only one part of the ultimate seduction,
isn't it?

We know they were there (when I say 'know' I mean this from the standpoint of current 'best information') - because Professor Knuth just told us this would be so, due to space-time differentials compared to 'steady' planet location time; and we also 'know' they take cell samples because all the academic research on 'abductions' says so.

So you tell me - should anyone care about 'you,' that is, the real individual physical you?

Thus I mean your personal DNA.

Here is something to factor in, 'if' some lunatics at some time try and fabricate an 'Alien arrival/invasion/whatever:'

ET Aliens are not using 'Tic Tac' thingy-things to travel to different stars. And they certainly do not require gross matter constructed 'vehicles' to take you anywhere. 

However, there are such objects. And I have previously elsewhere fully described what is inside them - a goopy, gel stuff that totally covers the whole 'you.' And then is compressed really significantly to hold you in... But 'in' exactly where?

Well, not 'in,' but together. It is used to keep 'you' together and not diffused up into 'starry light' and all of this.

So, there's 'you,' the physical DNA thing - Julius Caesar, for example. And there's Julius Caesar the personality who established modern 'Roman law' and was very good at dropping behind his quarry and circling back around when they had forgotten to suspect he was doing it or that he was even likely to do it.

Personal identity is about honest intention.

So okay, maybe they might find one or two of us, interesting enough to keep... In a tube. Relax. When there is money to be made, they'll tell us. Cause we're all cool here. 

For The Mature People

The track down at the bottom of this article is something that is one of the more mature types of compositions in the style of EDM trance. It isn't something that everyone is going to be able to handle who doesn't already have 'an ear,' or more importantly, the kind of 'experienced heart' that can comprehend where your feet will 'touch the bottom' of what is going on, and hold yourself from being pulled up by the hands or hair into the light above.

Major modern artists at Ibiza - the 
Trance Music Festival place, about to
attend one of later... (One of them here
is Dawn Hindle).

There have been a number of young people emailing me from having encountered some of the books we put up on various platforms over the past year, and fundamentally, those that are actually seeking something, certainly, seeing that they are still quite young with their lives ahead of them - well they run the risk of taking off into a wilderness, be it a literal desert, or a mountain cave, or some commune or whatever -, and abandoning the 'real world' and their normal material lives.

The problem with drugs of course, is that 'the light' is there - but the drugs will just help you far too much simply take off into it, fall upwards or leave the world, as it were, and not come back at all.

Many modern pop occultists want to pretend this is a false light, but that isn't correct at all. There is everything - utter silence and the prettiest melodies at the same time. 'False light' is a meaningless terminology when you are experiencing what is there in the 'upper world.'

You experience 'the' light in the same way as you would experience a BIR curry, or a Biryani...

Certainly you know what they are, if you have eaten them before.

And if I ask you right now - 'do you know what they are?' You will say 'of course I know what they are!'

Not 'Tom Ford's' Black Orchid.
Just an actual black orchid.

So kids ask, 'can we see God?' Or, 'are ET Aliens angels?' Or, 'can we see them?'

Yes for sure you can see (them all) and yes they are. Those 'experts' in the field like Dr Michael Heiser and so on, will quickly interject - 'oh but they could be fallen angels, or 'it could be the false light...'

Uh-huh. Could be.

And then they go: 'Don't go there.'

Uh-huh. ...Because, like, you're an expert, right, Dr Michael. ...In Biryani. You know what it is, what it tastes like.

The mature people remembering what has been said in these pages will 'connect' some dots, even though this all seems 'unconnected:'

Bill Gates divorces wife. China rocket falls 'out of control' somewhere.

'Out of control,' right?

Ya think?

Never mind, pyramids still there. No problem. Don't worry.

Very special, modern, adult 'spa room.'

...Let me take you into a spa room. There's not a lot of people in there, but there are one or two you would get on with. And afterwards, around the passages up to an adjoining set of rooms, you can have some Biryani. For example. Because 1. you have met people you really can get along with before, and 2. you have been to a spa and just hung out, and 3. you have had Biryani before. So. Nothing new there. No 'massive bright light' going off very likely.

The complication about bumping into real-live super - and I do mean really super-duper - advanced intelligent beings, is that they are demanding and complicated!

And they are totally uncompromising in expecting you to be 'up at their level.'

The 'orbis clipeus' space craft that the Roman soldiers saw and recorded, are exactly the same ones as those here now. Literally are the same craft with the literally exact same people inside. You see, according to Professor Kevin Knuth (Uni of Albany, NY), it takes about two weeks in their space-time to go back and forth from wherever they come from, while 2,000 years of Earth time has actually transpired here! Those Roman soldiers are all long dead since the 'two weeks' the ET people have made their round trip... We, are nothing but 'ephemera' to them.

So, you really do have to find a way to be more than that. Otherwise 'they' - are not paying any attention, to 'you.'

A real Royal Biryani - saffron, rose, Kashmiri chillis,
actually several different forms of 'rose...'

Meanwhile, here is Biryani. This is real Biryani. It contains rose essences extracted the same morning with the actual morning dew (literally) on the roses, and used during the ten hours of time required to cook the dish. In ten hours, ET Aliens in very fast craft have been to Neptune and back several times. And they are very hungry.

There's No Way Out From THIS Bit:

Look, don't hear my tone as if it is scolding anyone in particular, but we have to face facts: today, too many people - academics in particular, so called 'experts' - will just blithely throw out names and texts and sources, and then if you happen to really know those sources, as soon as you challenge them with a detail, or crucial details, it turns out they have NEVER EVEN READ the sources.

I encountered this, one notable time, with a University professor who was lecturing the particular area, and I had a conversation with him outside afterwards, and I said to him 'hey, I am ethnically from this group of people you are talking about, and you have never read these texts have you...?' And do you know what his response was: 'No, I haven't but I am just looking at sentence structure and logic in parts of those texts.'

Kerli - we played her, last video.

Now. Maybe you don't get how much dissimulation is contained in that answer, as far as what the students all believed they were 'learning...'

I don't see there is any escape from having to go back and read and re-read a range of ancient texts. And you cannot get away with saying 'oh I looked the stuff up on Wiki or some cheat note page.' That is going to give you absolutely zero idea of what is really in those texts. Because when YOU read them quietly for yourself, you may well come up with radically different views as to what they are really about. Compared to what you had once thought they were about.

So what I am attempting to do is leap over a whole bunch of necessary things to get us all to 'base: the first.' 'Leap' being, actually a bad idea! But we've done it. And that means when someone comes and says to me 'oh but this, oh but that,' it's exposing to me they haven't absorbed the background material properly at all.

Let me give you an example that will spin your head:

In a solid (Islamic) hadith albeit one that is more commonly turned out in the hands of Shi'a Muslims, one fellow yelled that if he found who had killed the Caliph Uthman, he was going to (excuse this, but I am quoting verbatim) 'F' the guy in his '*.'

...So, one guy who happened to be gay, dropped his pants and bent over and exclaimed 'I am he that killed Uthman.'

Real, ordinary human being, outside
Club A7 Berlin. Did you know that violet-skinned
people sweat smells different?

The hadith continues, as he was being *'d,' he next proclaimed that had he known this would be the result he would have killed him sooner, and more times(!) as well.

100% sound, 100% 'true' hadith. Most Muslims you know will even argue that such a thing exists. It does.

You've never heard it before.

So what's the point arguing with someone like myself if I tell you also 'the Bible says this, but not that...'

We could walk round and round in many circles while you wake up to the fact, that, well, what I had said was correct in the first place. Meanwhile, 'they' had all come, been, up and left - gone - and you would be still arguing about some silly nonsense that you only had in your head in the first place from very silly other people who told you the rubbish and it was rubbish when they told it to you.

One person commenting here said, very gratuitously - 'Oh I don't like the types of things she says...' And then, 'Oh I don't like what Dr David R. Hawkins says.' Yeah, okay, so what?

The key point that that girl Bridget Nielsen was making was that, ET Aliens have a plan to meet GROUPS of human beings OPENLY, and NOT single individuals all alone.

So. Groups of.

You can't have this - only five hundred
were ever made. 'Wonder Woman'
by House of Sillage.

So this is you guys, though, right? Most of you are like this, admit it: 'I am going to sit in, and play cards - against everyone else. Pretend to be with everyone else, and meanwhile judge and analyse...' ...and whatever else that you do. And then I'll get away with that because the super advanced, ultra-intelligent ET Aliens will not notice what I'm doing.

And that's fine, IF we are simply talking about any old 'social' exercise, any old human social get-together, but we are not.

So, don't think you are able to get away with meeting any super sophisticated advanced ET Alien people all on your own, if, you have that kind of mind-set.

Every single one of you here - except for two or three who have been taken through this before - will outright say: 'there is no (real) evidence in the past of ET Aliens being here or visiting here.'

Yes there is.

And for all the money that you have paid out for an education - everyone, and I mean everyone in the whole whole entire world today, at Universities, private centers, wherever, has NEVER EVER managed to come across the stupendously obvious clear-cut primary fact that is around and easily accessible right now to see.

Why not?

How many times have I said already - you put up a million dollars, and I will show it to you, and the world will stop. Dead on a dime.

Why 'money?' It's got nothing to do with money - it has to do with the other fact, that the media has an agenda that is not the same one as you or me getting our hands on any 'truth' at all. I could tell you, I could show you, but I guarantee you, the evidence will never see the light of day. And that is regardless of how impressive it is. Setting up a cash barrier is just a way of underscoring the point. I mean hey, Elon Musk claims to have a billion dollars. Does he though? His name is attached to a lot of stuff that goes on, sure. So what? It only means someone has attached his name there.

There is a different game going on than humans necessarily all having equal access to truth and facts.

You can have this - there's still a few around
for sale.

Now I happen to know, that well, sometimes these 'people' (I call them simply 'people' because that is afterall what they are) do turn up physically, materially in someone's life and 'hang out' and hand over some information and so on. But it's not only rare, they are very sneaky and clever at waiting for their exit to have already happened so that you cannot grab hold of their cloak, as it were! And only THEN, you suddenly realize 'oh *, that was who/what that was.' I'm a bit over that level, and I had a different early background as well, so I never was actually in that situation but I know a lot of others who have been. And we are talking government people, big industry people, people in um, Israeli Intelligence, military.

So - I am going to link to the 'livestream Sunday Session' page, and it's better that you go watch it LIVE at the time this Sunday (US time), rather than simply watch earlier date videos.

And when you observe what is going on (and you do really really need to have exquisite headphones to 'get it' properly), just understand this has all been going on for a while. The participants will occasionally say something that seems a bit 'strange' and you are likely to see quite a few instances of apparent 'mind-reading' or group quorum-seeking (which is the way scientists talk about it). Just observe.

And this particular group is by far the least 'remarkable' and the most 'mainstream' you could say; because there are others, so small, so private and so utterly um... ...interesting would be an understatement.

Or, maybe a Tritium key chain thing,
so that you can find your way in the dark.

Unlike yourself, a lot of these people were caught up more or less unwittingly. They did not go into it consciously knowing what was afoot.

You see, although one or two people will still likely cling on to the notion that they can 'pick and choose' which ideology, which philosophy, which political 'stand-point,' which social ethos, which moral system - that they want, there is only absolute truth to those who travel 5.8 trillion miles in a minute with ease and comfort. And if you don't have the same basis of 'knowledge' (because it is knowledge since it is to do with absolute truth), then they will simply 'lock you out.'

Here is the link: Paul Van Dyke Sunday Sessions

Come in, or stay out. That's all there is to it.