![]() |
The Paris Obelisk. |
![]() |
'I'll go to your room, but you have to seduce me.' Line from the movie. ...Oh. Okay. |
![]() |
No, I can't seduce you. Would you like some vanilla butter-cream cakes instead? |
![]() |
The Paris Obelisk. |
![]() |
'I'll go to your room, but you have to seduce me.' Line from the movie. ...Oh. Okay. |
![]() |
No, I can't seduce you. Would you like some vanilla butter-cream cakes instead? |
Okay so I'm attempting to set out a 'target.' Something that, if you simply look towards 'it,' you will not fail to maintain a true course towards much much greater freedom from the usual so-called 'cares' of life.
Those cares are really, impositions by malicious figures in high places - I don't mean 'spiritual' or unseen 'high' places; I just mean governments and officials who are acting in ways to preserve the status quo for themselves.
But then, when I try and think about explaining such a 'target' it turns into an exercise of further and further explanation, not simply just a description of a thing.
![]() |
The Cartier museum. Is this 'authentic?' An authentic expression of 'Cartier?' Maybe. Dunno. Plays to the China market of course. |
I could 'describe' it and no one would know what I'm talking about.
On the one hand I tell myself (justify it this way) that I would tend to have and to have had, fewer interactions with people generally in my life (and so am not used to communicating easily), but then that's not true at all!
So it's not true that I cannot communicate normally...
However - 'normal' is what we do when we are following a script.
It's a 'social script' that we are mostly all employing all of the time.
The reason that certain actresses (and it is mostly actresses, the men are stock characters on the whole) get type-cast, for example, in the romantic roles, that drag an emotional response from everyone, is that they know the script very well. And they get away with it because down to the eyebrow raises and the 'dumb-innocent-surprised' looks, they have that all down pat.
Most of them are pretty smart and they will tell you outright that they are inhibited in real-life relationships because of the constant expectations that strangers have of them on account of the movie-world dialogue and that, although it is sometimes authentic, the rest of who they are is taken as inauthentic because it does not meet up with the expectations!
I just watched a short video from some neuro-scientist who had 'found religion' and so on, and his ah-ha moment was when he realized he was placing an expectation on his own Autistic kid that that individual was 'following a social script' and was not actually feeling anything for his father...
![]() |
'Second-hand' store in Florence. Is authentic. There's no agenda anymore, so it is authentic now. |
According to him he heard a distinct voice in his head (when he was searching for 'God') and it said 'and that's what you're doing to me.'
So really, the question is this one - are we all behaving just like Autistic people in our interactions within human society, and following a script that has been given to us?
To be reasonable about things, it's not so much - 'give up everything and come follow me,' said the Lord God (Muslims all declare that nowhere did Jesus say He was God, Worship Me... LOL ...And that they know for sure because they were all there, right).
It's that how much 'of ourselves' are we having to necessarily give up, in order to obtain the authentic center core personality of who you are.
Most people will immediately riposte 'Oh no, if only whoever is out there, space Aliens, gods (with a little 'g') God the Big Thing, other -, just would make themselves known clearly and obviously to me, and stay there long enough for me to do some science on it (I had to chuck that in because I do that) to prove it.'
Then, I would be authentic; or else I'm sure enough that I am authentic enough to just be allowed to ask to see something clearly for goddamn once!
And what if there is a 'Space Beacon' around here somewhere, more or less running everything, and male consciousnesses go through the Great Pyramid, losing whichever bits of their false egos cannot fit into the ever-tightening space of the hypothetical 'spirit' passage on the way up, until there is nothing much left at the top and they get ejected into the next life - down here. And the females via the next-sized one, and so on -, including animals.
![]() |
It's a script. It's fashion. It's just a scripted social compliance thing. |
And so, none of them remembers all the bad things that happened to them caused by others - around whom they still have to live down here, and they also forget everything bad they themselves did.
And it's all just a 'machine.' And it works.
But it's still a machine operation.
And what say if it is all like that on every single planet across the entire Universe that has sentient intelligent beings living on it?
Because people are all inauthentic.
You think not? How many ideas do you have in your own head, that you believe, that actually someone told you, and you don't even know that person? But you still cling onto that idea, that belief, as if it is 'yours,' and worse still, you do things because of it!
Unless and until you own, and I mean really own, who you are - then you ain't goin' nowhere.
...So, yes, there is a parallel system going on, and 'maybe' you can jump across into that.
What I can say with absolute certain knowledge - as in I know it and am able to demonstrate it over and over at will if I wish - is that the Universe is far more complicated, more complex, than people generally believe to be the case, and there is an amazing array of creatures around, some highly intelligent, some fairly similar to humans, and they exist right under people's noses and within their plain eyesight.
But there is a strict and rigid separation between the two kinds of 'worlds' as it were. You can pray all you like to any thing at all that you conceive is a higher power - and it will not answer you. And because of that most people, by far most -, conclude there must be no such power, no such Being, no such Beingness.
![]() |
Recipes are also scripts, but... They are substantial and you eat them; eat the results at any rate. |
Well certainly Richard Dawkins cannot tell you what will become of him after his death, and neither can Stephen Fry or deGrasse Tyson et al.
And so they conclude a certain thing and everyone is meant to accept what they say, what they have concluded. Because it is 'scientific.' So they say.
Well but actually it's not scientific though, is it? They do not know something, and then, draw a positive conclusion from their ignorance instead of just saying 'I do not know.'
My problem is not that I do not know, but that I am finding some difficulty saying it outright to people who might just as easily react to it by walking off their jobs!
LOL
Walk off your job you may do, but make sure you know who is the one doing the walking though, right.
Make sure it is the you you. The real one.
Make plans for you.
No script in hand that other people wrote for you. No expectations as to what you will find.
Only the expectation for authenticity. Which is the only coin you own.
Certainly I could describe 'it' - the target place, some kind of 'high end' people meeting place - and no one would know what I'm talking about.
![]() |
Expensive candles. |
![]() |
The White Room. ...Is not so technology-replete; there is some of it, but not this much of it, in there. Or in that kind of place. Say - two/three smaller screens and everything else exactly the same. |
![]() |
One side wall of Grauman's Chinese old theater place. Very complicated, very ornate. |
![]() |
You must make your own 'Oil of Elijah...' |
![]() |
Design by repetition. Seems 'new.' Isn't. |
![]() |
What is inside the White Box? Get it... |
Well I don't even know where 'Oviedo' is - didn't: looked it up, found out it's in the North of Spain.
Which of course takes me in my mind at least to the song 'Brandy' by Looking Glass. ...Apparently there is 'the finest silver' from there. LOL
Anyway, let's get back to the subject at hand, which is 'bored housewives.'
There's this tremendously not-very-good (actually is quite good, but - we'll get onto that later) movie Directed by the troubled Woody Allen, in which Javier Bardem, playing an incredibly wealthy guy, asks these two women to go with him to Oviedo.
![]() |
This is called 'mise en scene.' These things are very deliberate. |
It is really an astonishing scene that particular one, and then the movie goes into the same old turgid stupidity that movies have to go into, because that is what the secret rulers of the planet dictate must happen. Nobody is of entirely sound mind, nobody is allowed to 'make it out,' whether it be by way of some proposition by a zillionaire, or by any other of countless contrivances spelled out in pop culture, performed in movies, and otherwise intellectually bled dry by the political drivel dripping out through the rivulets made by the slices of the scalpel blades of the general media.
The ending of the story turns on the stance of the character played by Scarlett Johansson, where in the face, ostensibly, of an absurdly accommodating lifestyle, she manages to say - again, ostensibly on the apparent moral cause of being got shot at and slightly injured - 'I cannot live like this.'
To be absolutely candid, I haven't even watched the movie but I have scanned through the shooting script with dialogue, and it occurs to me that a Jewish person who is blithely ignorant of the power of psychoanalysis (in this case the Director Allen) has to be lying.
So anyway, apparently the Johansson character's eventual action turns on the fundamental idea that no one can be 'saved' - from themselves, from inter-personal conflicts developing within their own close circles, and no one really cares about economic circumstances and so they can all just 'go find a normal job.' ...When the 'ideal' relationship/s explode.
![]() |
Chinese Restaurant thing, right? LOL Grauman's Chinese Theater is not even called that anymore. That's because it isn't it. |
Now, the point I am trying to get at, is that our own individual human lives ought not to be so misdirected in the first place. Movieland, pop culture and the deliberate 'grid patterns' forced on people by governments, intend to make sure that everyone is misdirected and starts out from the position of there never having been any natural direction at all in the first place...
Right?
That's right, isn't it?
You have no inkling of where you were, or who you were, or what you did, before you were born - 'sci-entists' insist that no one knows or can know and that 'you' are just the product of some genetic characteristics but mostly, your social environment (which is of course, the politics!).
If I tried to demonstrate altogether clearly here, what 'it's all about,' it would lean towards becoming some kind of a cult matter...!
And we don't need to do that for one very important reason that I will explain presently.
But let's just set out a schema first, and you can make of it what you will:
'Humans' are Titans.
That is why they over-populate and forever seem to be increasing in numbers. This is a deliberate plan of very clever 'higher' minds (not the mundane 'overlords') to split the Titanic powers into tiny pieces, over and over until their power is gone completely, or very nearly completely.
![]() |
Frankly it's not advisable to 'worship' a god you do not know. How do you, exactly, personally know the one you think you are worshiping? Who told you to worship it? |
'Titan' means to strain, to ever-strain at some secret, hidden agenda, whilst showing a facade that tells another story to the ill-advised.
There are many more than one type of 'being' here though, albeit by far the Titanic are the most in number.
And all of them, because of the nature of the growing organic form, (usually) can have no organic retained detailed memory, and everything they do have that they retain, comes from sensory experiences in the immediate bodily iteration, and not any other ones, despite that electromagnetic fields exceed any limitations of body form and particular temporal iteration, and they do so for several reasons including that one of 'quantum tunneling' and the like.
So this borders on cult ideas, if modern, sci-fi style of such.
But here is something you can hang your hat on, so to speak, and which will work, have the desired effect - and whose only real explanation must go along the lines of what I just now said.
You - you yourself personally - resonate to very specific things. Things which others might not resonate with.
The Lineage Taoist magicians, tell it like this: you go to any Chinese Restaurant more or less, and you will see quite similar menus, and even the pics that they all display, appear to show very uniform dishes.
But you know, as a Chinese with your particular dialect form and its culture, that you have favorite places whose cooks make things exactly the way you like and have always liked, since childhood.
You can write out your order, and you can even get the bill, but it depends on which cook is making the food, whether your get 'satisfied' or not.
After all, it's a Chinese Restaurant!
![]() |
Jarring. |
They're all the same, right?
Not.
And so even if you acquire techniques through here, via which you will start to be able to 'see' visions let's call them, and recall dreams during the last phase of natural sleep, where the norepinephrine signals start to wake up the conscious memory cells - unless you are addressing your 'order' at the right restaurant, to the right preferred chef or cook, when you get the bill, it may be either more than you think the food deserved, or even outrageous, or just simply paying for not what you 'ordered.'
Look at the world, look over the whole span of the human race - people are not all the same.
The 'Gods' and the 'Angels' (the spiritual cooks, so to speak) are all 'ethnically' different.
Step Number 1.
Find out your own personal harmonic.
A couple of nights ago, for me it is (was; kind of still is for this week) the Winter Solstice down here. I was at a camp fire in the middle of white snow and breathing cold crisp air. The logs were piled and the flames burned high, and the embers down deep within those burning logs and flames glowed bright.
![]() |
Down here, it is the Winter Solstice. |
Around the fire were a handful of people.
In one of the non-canonical Gospels, it says that Jesus taught his closest associates one time when they were out in the open, far away from the public -, how to 'extract people' from the left side of your ribs. What is really meant there, is that if you hold someone around their waist, there is a sense of flow from your left , even if you are left-handed; that doesn't matter. You grab with your right hand, and you give out with ease, through your left.
Now it's not possible to 'extract people' out of your ribs.
What you will find, is that you will feel instantly repelled if that other person is completely 'in-harmonic' to you. Jungians know about this.
...You don't have to actually physically take someone in hand, as it were, to note this. Your mind extends beyond the limitations of your physical body. Just thinking about it will give you the same feelings.
Find out your own personal harmonic.
Then you will find the circle.
And when you find the circle, let Woody Allen know. Here's some Summer music for you up there. If you have the time and the decent headphones, it will pay to listen to the words, at least a little past half way in anyway:
...FAMAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHS.
This is Robin Leach from the sun-drenched beaches... ...of GAZAAAAAAAAAAA.
I've been trying to stay on that subject matter! (Lifestyle, luxury, nobody else's business stuff).
That wasn't going to work, was it.
As you all know, I have been saying for maybe a month or so, that it has been extremely quiet upstairs - which I put down to 'something going on.'
Well I guess regardless of how much I try and stall talking about it, there are at least two important factors that have to be taken into consideration when you try and figure out what might happen next and what will happen eventually. (Nuke stuff).
![]() |
'Champagne! Caviar! Gucci!' |
But first of all, a short word back on the subject that someone raised privately - and that is connected to this modern issue of 'stress and anxiety.'
Along with feelings of stress and anxiety, there is this whole cohort of the entire population which is said to have 'ADHD.'
And this condition is mostly always treated by doctors who use prescription medicines like dexamphetamine - which is a stimulant - the claim being that stimulants can also act like sedatives in certain situations plus there is the idea that DMA (dexamphetamine) speeds up the signal traffic in neural networks.
So what though?
That's not what causes ADHD - it's not a matter of signal traffic speed, and besides no one has any idea of how fast any specific individual's neural networks are or whether it has any impact at all on anything. There is absolutely no scientific material, no studies which are able to accommodate the gathering of such in situ data objectively; there is the possibility of 'neural de-coding' which is an after-the-event analysis.
ADHD is supposedly the inability to stay on one area of focus - or 'attention' - and to be rapidly going from one thing to another thing.
This is caused by the person being taken away or out of their natural state and life context, and also being subjected to unknowns too frequently. Unknowns spell risk and danger in the normal brain. People with 'ADHD' do not have a medical 'condition.' They have a life framework condition, a contextual situation that is not normal or natural to them.
People can only usefully speed up their neural network traffic and signal speeds when they are doing known things, known tasks, with reliable outcomes. Too much risky change is a danger signal in people's brains and that is the correct signal.
People's brains go rapidly from one thing to another when they are searching out links to tangential solutions where no direct answers seem immediately available or obvious.
We will have to look much more closely at ways to move away from whatever context is driving that immediate frantic response - it is not easy and there may not be simple solutions, typically because in the first place, the matter is very likely to be an economically-demanded or driven, one.
...Meanwhile, back to that matter that we did not want to name here - IE Iran.
LOL
Two things should be noted about it:
One, the Ayatollah (the 'Sign' of 'Ul Lah' - the Serpent; that's what 'Lat/Lah' means in Arabic) Khamenei, is not an Iranian ethnically, he is Turkic - a Turk from Azerbaijan.
Secondly, the IRGC, is NOT the Iranian Army.
The ISLAMIC Revolutionary Guard Corps, dominates the funding and power of the Iranian Military and is only a component of that - being no more than ten thousand soldiers at this moment; possibly less right now, and with no top commanders in the original command structure left.
The actual Iran Military comprises maybe 150,000 soldiers.
So, what happens next will unfold soon enough in the material sense and not just theoretically, or 'on paper,' so we don't need to speculate here.
When sudden change is proposed or is possible or is going to happen, then people's brains shift gears automatically.
People's lives today are run on a dynamic of two competing things - therefore a dialectic:
The technology of distraction versus the technology of carriage and direction.
![]() |
That's not alcoholic. That's apricot syrup, gold flakes, rose water, and pushal Saffron. |
'Carriage' meaning what will get you to where you want to go.
'Direction' meaning that you know your objective and where you want to go.
A 'distraction' which is not a pleasant temporary diversion, is a deliberate act to steer you away from where you want to go. By the time this happens so often in young people's lives, they no longer will actually have the knowledge of their own objective/s. These had been replaced by an external 'society's' demands placed on those people - it's not even really their own society.
Governments know, that where people want to go is not where they, the governments want them to be or to go - so they deliberately, quite deliberately impose impediments and longer-term distractions and uncertainties in the path.
The end result, my friends, would absolutely NOT be any different if you had a B-2 stealth bomber...
And as I have said many times here recently - 'the elephant in the room.'
Right now that 'elephant' is doing something important over the next couple of weeks.
But after that, he's coming back here.
Lord General Gan - is coming here.
Star Wars is more or less a real thing.
You can go up there. And it is not a dream: